Framing of Charge:

Legal Provisions:
• Section 242: This legal provision outlines the process for framing charges.
• Sections 221 to 230: These sections offer comprehensive guidelines on the procedure for
framing charges.
Language of Court:
Charges must be articulated in the language of the court, ensuring precision and clarity in legal
terminology.
Legal Precedent - Abdul Latif vs. The State (2020 PCR.LJ 80 Sindh):
The case of Abdul Latif vs. The State (2020 PCR.LJ 80 Sindh) serves as a legal precedent
concerning the framing of charges. It provides potential insights into the application and
interpretation of Section 242.
Objectives of Charge - Asim Yaseen vs. The State and Another (2018 MLD 259 Lahore):
The case of Asim Yaseen vs. The State and Another (2018 MLD 259 Lahore) is likely to
elucidate the objectives of framing charges, emphasizing the necessity of clearly presenting
allegations against the accused.
Guidelines about the Charge:
Sections 221 to 230 offer specific guidelines, covering elements such as delineating the offense,
furnishing details of accusations, and ensuring the charge is thorough and unambiguous.
Format of Charge:
The structure of a charge typically adheres to legal requirements as stipulated in relevant
procedural sections. This includes specifics of the offense, pertinent legal provisions, and a lucid
statement of the accusations.
In essence, the process of framing charges in criminal proceedings is a pivotal stage guided by
precise legal provisions (Section 242 and Sections 221 to 230). Legal precedents such as Abdul
Latif vs. The State and Asim Yaseen vs. The State and Another may provide valuable insights
into the practical application, objectives, and guidelines pertaining to charge framing. The charge
format is systematically designed to ensure a transparent and comprehensive presentation of
allegations against the accused.