MHR640 Book Club Reflection Rubric
Meets or Exceeds Standards
Reflection on Team
Dynamics, Efforts to
Facilitate Dialogue &
Viewpoint Diversity, and
Evolution of Discourse
Your Score:
Self-reflection and learning
from book club activity
Reflection on leading and
following during book club
meeting
Approaching Standards Below Standards
The paper offered a fair but not
The paper outlines a rigorous
fully comprehensive discussion
discussion surrounding the means
surrounding the means through
through which an environment was
which an environment was
established to encourage dialogue and
established to encourage
debate, how their dialogue evolved
dialogue and debate, how their
over the course of meetings, and what
dialogue evolved over the course
individual factors informed
of meetings, and what individual
perspectives & provoked differences in
factors informed perspectives &
opinion.
provoked differences in opinion.
Between 8 – 10 Between 6 – 7.9
The student provides a
The student provides a nuanced
discussion of what they
discussion of what they learned
learned through this exercise,
through participation in the book
although the learning is
club
somewhat superficial.
Between 8 – 10 Between 6 – 7.9
The paper provides an
The paper outlines both positive
overview of positive
experiences and suggested
experiences but limited
improvements/room for
discussion of further
development and what could be
development and/or reflection
done differently the next time they
on leadership or followership
are in a leadership/followership
but not both. HEXACO
position. The discussion is well
results are included but not
supported by HEXACO results.
integrated into the discussion.
Between 8 – 10 Between 6 – 7.9
Unsatisfactory
The paper offered a limited
discussion surrounding the means
through which an environment was
The paper offered no reflection on
established to encourage dialogue
and discussion of team dynamics and
and debate, how their dialogue
the evolution of discourse across
evolved over the course of
meetings of the book club.
meetings, and what individual
factors informed perspectives &
provoked differences in opinion.
Between 5 – 5.9 Less than 5
The student provides limited The student fails to discuss what
discussion of what they learned they learned through this process
through book club participation and/or the discussion is unrelated
and/or the discussion is to the book club process.
somewhat narrow in scope and
could be more thoughtful
and/or detailed.
Between 5 – 5.9 Less than 5
The discussion of
The student fails to discuss their
leadership/followership
experiences in a
experiences is superficial
leadership/followership role
and/or lacks reflection. Limited
and/or provides no support from
use of the HEXACO as
their HEXACO results.
support.
Between 5 – 5.9 Less than 5
 The paper is organized in a
manner that makes it somewhat
The paper is organized in a coherent, The paper is in a manner that
easy to understand and follow
Professionalism & Quality and professional manner that makes it makes it difficult to understand
the train of arguments – some The paper is constructed very poorly
of Writing Grammar, easy to understand and follow the train and follow the train of arguments.
room for improvement of and is near impossible to follow
Language, and of arguments. The language is clear, Paragraph structure is lacking and
coherence and flow. The and/or understand.
Organization and proper paragraph structure is the paper contains numerous
language is mostly clear with
employed with no spelling or spelling and grammatical errors.
minimal spelling and
grammatical errors.
grammatical errors.

Your Score: Between 8 – 10 Between 6 – 7.9 Between 5 – 5.9 Less than 5