REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
COURT BRANCH 4

AUDREY VALENZUELA,
Plaintiff,
Civil case No. 546789

-versus-

POCHOLO RAMOS,
Defendants.
x --------------------------------------------/

JUDICIAL AFFIDAVIT OF AUDREY VALENZUELA

(In form of Questions and Answers in

Lieu of Petitioners’ Direct Testimony)

I, AUDREY VALENZUELA of legal age, single, and a resident of

125 Gedli Street, Santa Mesa Manila, hereby affirm that the person
interrogating me is ATTY. ROSEMARIE VIAJE, with office address
at Viaje Law Office, Manila City. The interrogation is being held at the same
address.

I am answering her questions fully conscious that I do so under oath

and that I may face criminal liability for false testimony or perjury.
OFFER OF TESTIMONY: The testimony of witness, AUDREY
VALENZUELA is being offered as direct testimony of the above-mentioned
case:
1.) Q: Do you swear the whole truth and nothing but the truth?
A: I do
2.) Q: Are you aware that you can face criminal liability for false
testimony or perjury if you will not tell the truth?
A: Yes, I am aware of that.
3.) Q: Please state your name, age, civil status, occupation, and
address.
A: I am Audrey Valenzuela, 23 years old, single, currently working as call
center agent in Kunsintrex company and my exact address is 125 Gedli
Street, Snta Mesa Manila
4.) Q: Do you know Mr. Ramos?
A: Yes.
5.) Q: How did you come to know the defendant?
A: He was previous co-worker when I was a service crew.
6.) Q: I am showing you this document, herein referred to as Annex
“A”. Do you know this document?
A: Yes, I do.
7.) Q: What is this document?
A: It is a promissory note.
8.) Q: Who executed this promissory note?
A: Mr. Anonuevo Ma’am
9.) Q: When was this executed?
A: On December 21, 2022
10.) Q. When was the promissory note demandable?
A: June 3, 2023
11.) Q: After the promissory note became due and demandable,
What did you do?
A: I sent him various letters demanding to pay his balance
within 5 days of receipt of the letter.
12.) Q: I am presenting to you this document herein referred to as
as Annex “B’’. Do you know this document?
A: Yes. That is the acknowledgement receipt I issued to Mr.
Ramos for the Php 100,000.00 partial payment for his
Loan.
13.) Q. I’m showing you this document herein referred to as Annex
“C”. Do you know about this document?
A: Yes. That is the demand letter which was duly received by
Mr. Ramos.
14.) Q: How did you come to know of this document?
A: I was the one who issued it.
16.) Q: Was there payment made by Mr. Ramos?
A: No. Mr. Ramos did not pay
17.) Q: Did you make other demands other than the letter?
A: Yes. I made demands to him orally.
18.) Q: How many oral demands did you made?
A: I made 3 oral demands to him.
19.) Q: Did Mr. Ramos pay?
A: No. Ma’am
20.) Q: Did Mr. Ramos made any attempts to communicate
to you regarding the said loan?
A: No.
All the foregoing has been explained to me by the notary public, and I fully
understood the meaning and import of the averments above, and I attest to
its veracity.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature this 19th
day of December 2023 at Manila City, Philippines.

AUDREY VALENZUELA
AFFIANT

-SWORN ATTESTATION-
I hereby attest that I faithfully recorded the questions I asked and the
corresponding answers that the witness gave and neither she nor any
other person then present or assisting her coached the witness
regarding the latter’s answers.

ATTY. ROSEMARIE VIAJE

Examining Lawyer

SUBSCRIED AND SWORN to before me this 19th day of December

2023in the City of Manila, Philippines.

Doc No. 22
Page No. 01
Book No. 22
Series of 2023

ATTY. FATIMA GARCIA

Notary Public

Copy Furnished:
ATTY: RHEX MANIPON
Counsel for Defendant
Manipon Law Office, Gedli, Manila City.