A MURDER CASE WAS FILED AGAINST ALPHA. BRAVO WAS PRESENTED AS WITNESS.

BRAVO TESTIFIED
THAT HE SAW ALPHA KILLED THE VICTIM. THE TESTIMONY OF BRAVO IS CONSIDERED WHAT KIND OF
EVIDENCE?

TO PROVE HOMICIDE, THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE WERE PRESENTED: TESTIMONY OF A WITNESS THAT
HE SAW ALPHA RUNNING AWAY FROM THE PLACE WHERE BRAVO WAS FOUND DEAD; THE SHIRT OF
ALPHA IS STAINED WITH BLOOD OF THE VICTIM; THE BOLO FOUND IN THE POSSESSION OF ALPHA IS
ALSO STAINED WITH BLOOD. THESE EVIDENCE ARE CONSIDERED AS:

A PIECE OF PAPER WAS PRESENTED TO PROVE WHAT CUT THE THROAT OF THE VICTIM. THE PIECE OF
PAPER CONTAINED LETTER, WORDS, NUMBERS AND FIGURES. THIS PIECE OF PAPER IS CONSIDERED AS:

A GRAVEYARD TOMBSTONE WAS PRESENTED AS EVIDENCE. IT CONTAINED THE NAME, THE DATES OF
BIRTH AND DEATH OF THE VICTIM. THE FACT IN ISSUE IS THE AGE OF THE VICTIM AT THE TIME OF
DEATH. THE TOMBSTONE IS CONSIDERED AS:

IF THE PROSECUTION WANTS TO PROVE THAT PHILIPPINES IS COMPOSED OF LUZON, VISAYAS, AND
MINDANAO, WHAT EVIDENCE MUST IT PRESENT?

ALPHA AND BRAVO SIGNED A WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHERE ALPHA WILL PAY BRAVO P10,000 AFTER
TWO MONTHS FROM SIGNING OF THE AGREEMENT. ALPHA DID NOT PAY AFTER TWO MONTHS. BRAVO
FLIED A CASE AGAINST ALPHA. ALPHA TESTIFIED THAT THE AGREEMENT WAS TO PAY BRAVO AFTER 2
YEARS, AND NOT AFTER TWO MONTHS. IS THE TESTIMONY OF ALPHA ADMISSIBLE?

THE FOLLOWING ARE EXAMPLES OF MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE, EXCEPT:

ALPHA MADE A JUDICIAL ADMISSION. HOW CAN HE CONTRADICT THIS JUDICIAL ADMISSION?

CHARLIE ADMITTED IN COURT THAT HE WAS PRESENT AT THE SCENE OF THE CRIME. THIS IS AN
EXAMPLE OF:

PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS EVIDENCE OF THE _________.

WITHOUT ANY SEARCH WARRANT, POLICE OFFICER ALPHA ENTERED THE HOUSE OF BRAVO AND FOUND
10 DRUMS OF SHABU. BRAVO WAS CHARGED IN VIOLATION OF RA NO. 9165. POLICE OFFICER ALPHA
PRESENTED THE 10 DRUMS OF SHABU. ARE THE 10 DRUMS OF SHABU ADMISSIBLE IN EVIDENCE?
ALPHA, BRAVO, AND CHARLIE ALL TESTIFIED THAT THEY SAW DELTA STABBED ECHO. THE TESTIMONIES
ARE CONSIDERED AS:

POLICE OFFICER ALPHA IS FACING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CASE IN NAPOLCOM. ARE THE RULES OF
EVIDENCE APPLICABLE IN THIS ADMINISTRATIVE CASE?

ALPHA BURNED THE HOUSE OF BRAVO. THE WALL OF THE BURNED HOUSE HAS WRITINGS STATING
“DAPAT LANG MASUNOG ANG BAHAY MO! YOURS TRULY, ALPHA”. IF THE WALL IS PRESENTED AS
EVIDENCE THAT THE HOUSE IS BURNED, IT IS CONSIDERED AS:

MAY A DOCUMENT BE OFFERED AND ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BOTH AS DOCUMENTARY AND AS OBJECT
EVIDENCE?

IF A PARTY WILL PRESENT A WITNESS BEFORE THE COURT, WHEN SHALL AN OBJECTION TO HIS/HER
TESTIMONY BE MADE?

A PHOTOCOPY OF A DOCUMENT ONCE SUBMITTED FALLS UNDER WHAT TYPE OF ADMISSIBILITY?

TO PROVE THAT THE BULLET RECOVERED FROM THE CRIME SCENE EMANATES FROM THE FIREARMS
OWNED BY THE ACCUSED, A BALLISTIC REPORT WAS SUBMITTED. THE BALLISTIC REPORT IS CONSIDERED
AS AN _____.

THE FOLLOWING ARE SECONDARY EVIDENCE, EXCEPT:

FIREARMS, BLADED WEAPON, DRUGS AND SIMILAR NATURE OF EVIDENCE OFFERED TO PROVE AN ISSUE
ARE BETTER KNOWN AS?

IF THE DOCUMENT IS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE ADVERSE PARTY, WHAT MAY BE SUBMITTED AS A
SUBSTITUTE?

IN WHAT INSTANCE THE COURT ALLOWS PRESENTATION OF SUMMARIES OF A DOCUMENT INSTEAD OF

THE ORIGINAL?
XX IS PRESENTING IN COURT RECORDINGS OF HIM WITH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINANT IN AN INTIMATE
MOMENT. THIS IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF TELLING THE COURT THAT THEY ARE LOVERS. SAID RECORDINGS
ORIGINALLY CAME FROM THE PHONE OF THE COMPLAINANTS WHO IS NOW CHARGING HIM OF RAPE.
WHAT KIND OF EVIDENCE IS THE RECORDINGS?

IF IN THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, THEY MAKE USE OF THE WORD "SALE" IN ALMOST ALL OF THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT BUT ONE PARTY IS DISPROVING IT TO BE A MORTGAGE. WHAT
INTERPRETATION MAY THE COURT USE?

IN A NEW LAW, CONVICTED OFFENDER IS GIVEN THE CHANCE TO SERVE COMMUNITY SERVICE IN LIEU
OF IMPRISONMENT. ASSUMING THAT THE LAW ITSELF EXCLUDES HABITUAL OFFENDER AND THE
ACCUSED WAS NOT YET SENTENCE IN A PREVIOUS CASE FILED AGAINST HIM WHICH WILL MAKE HIM
HABITUAL, CAN THE COURT GIVE HIM COMMUNITY SERVICE?

WHEN IS RESORT TO EXPERT WITNESS IS MADE IN TERMS OF WRITTEN AGREEMENT?

IF IN A WRITTEN AGREEMENT THERE WERE HANDWRITING ENTRIES AND THOSE THAT ARE PRINTED,
WHAT SHOULD PREVAIL.

ALLAN AND BABY SIGNED A COMPROMISE AGREEMENT FOR THE SUPPORT OF THEIR CHILD CINDY. IN
THE WRITTEN AGREEMENT APPEARS, I ALLAN PROMISED TO GIVE FIVE THOUSAND PESOS MONTHLY
SUPPORT FOR THE NEED OF MY DAUGHTER CINDY. PROBLEM ARISES WHEN ALLAN GAVE THE AMOUNT
EVERY AFTER 40 DAYS. IF INTERPRETATION IS TO BE MADE AS TO THE WORD “MONTHLY”, WHAT
SHOULD BE THE INTERPRETATION?

RULE ON WHICH THE STATEMENT CONVEYED BY ONE TO ANOTHER IS TREATED TO BE STRICTLY

CONFIDENTIAL AND THEREFORE PROTECTED BY LAW.

RULE APPLICABLE TO DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT ONLY THE ORIGINAL IS ALLOWED TO BE

PRESENTED.

THIS RULE PROHIBITS THE CHILD TO TESTIFY AGAINST HIS PARENT.

APPLICABLE WHEN THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO WRITING.

EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE WHEN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HAS BEEN LOST OR DESTROYED AND CANNOT
BE PRODUCED IN COURT.

SECONDARY EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED UNDER THE FOLLOWING EXCEPT.

JOE WAS CHARGED OF MURDER, THE PROSECUTION SUBMITTED THE KNIFE, FINGERPRINT OF JOE AND
TESTIMONY OF WITNESS. JOE ON HIS PART SUBMITS DTR REPORT, CERTIFICATION OF HIS EMPLOYER
THAT HE REPORTS FOR DUTY AND TESTIMONY OF HIS FRIEND TO PROVE HIS DEFENSE. WHAT IS THE
FACT IN ISSUE THAT INTENDS TO BE PROVEN BY JOE?

IN THE SAME SITUATION, WHAT IS THE FACTUM PROBANDUM OF THE PROSECUTION?

PATIENTS COMMUNICATION TO A PHYSICIAN IS CONSIDERED PRIVILEGE AND APPLIES BOTH IN CRIMINAL

AND CIVIL CASES. A HUSBAND CAN TESTIFY AGAINST HIS WIFE ON INFORMATION RELAYED BY ONE TO
THE OTHER.

PAROL EVIDENCE IS ALLOWED TO MODIFY STATEMENT IN THE WRITTEN AGREEMENT. STATEMENTS

AGREED UPON BY PARTY WHICH ARE REDUCED TO WRITING ARE PAROL EVIDENCE.

ALL EVIDENCE MAY BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE SO LONG AS IT STANDS SUPREME FOR THE TIME BEING.
DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE MAY BE OBJECT EVIDENCE.

IN THE TRIAL FOR ROBBERY, THE PROSECUTION IS PRESENTING TWO PIECES OF EVIDENCE; TESTIMONY
OF THE WITNESS THAT THE ACCUSED WAS SEEN IN POSSESSION OF THE STOLEN ITEM AND ANOTHER
CCTV FOOTAGE THAT THE ACCUSED IS LOITERING AROUND THE VILLAGE WHEN THE ALLEGED INCIDENT
HAPPENED. THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF?

THE EYEWITNESS OF THE PROSECUTION IS SPECIALIZED IN THE FIELD OF BALLISTIC EXAMINATION. HE

TESTIFIES ON THE FACT THAT THE BULLET WAS FIRED FROM THE FIREARMS OF THE ACCUSED. WHAT
AMONG THE CHOICES BEST REFLECT THE ANSWER?

UNDER THE RULE ON EVIDENCE, FRUIT OF POISONOUS TREE IS NOT ADMISSIBLE. WHAT AMONG THE
CHOICES BEST REFLECT THE ANSWER?
ONCE THE PRIMARY SOURCE IS SHOWN TO HAVE BEEN UNLAWFULLY OBTAINED, ANY SECONDARY
EVIDENCE DERIVED FROM IT IS ALSO NOT ADMISSIBLE.

JUAN (THE ACCUSED) VOCALLY TELLS THE COURT THAT HE IS WITH THE VICTIM BEFORE THE LATTER HAS
BEEN REPORTED LOST. HIS ACTION BEST REFLECTS?

THE COURT REJECTS MARIO’S PRESENTATION OF THE IMAGE OF LETTERS TO PROVE THAT HE AND THE
VICTIM WERE SWEETHEARTS, THE COURT RULES IN ACCORDANCE TO?

WHILE BOY IS PRESENTED TO TESTIFY THAT HIS FATHER (THE ACCUSED) GAVE HIM THE STOLEN
CELLPHONE, THE OPPOSING LAWYER OBJECT. WHAT IS THE GROUND FOR OBJECTION?

RELIEVES THE PARTIES FROM THE NECESSITY OF INTRODUCING EVIDENCE TO PROVE CERTAIN FACT.

ALLAN CANNOT BY DUE DILIGENCE PRESENTS THE ORIGINAL TITLE OF THE LAND IN DISPUTE. IF HE WILL
SUBMIT PHOTOGRAPH OF THE TITLE, WHAT AMONG THE CHOICES BEST REFLECT THE ANSWER?

IN A DISPUTE FOR PARTITION, ONE OF THE HEIRS ALLEGE THAT THE PORTION HE ALREADY OCCUPIES
WERE IDENTIFIED AS HIS SHARE FOLLOWING THE WORDINGS OF A PRIVATE DOCUMENT SIGNED BY ALL
HIS SIBLINGS. HIS SIBLINGS SUBMIT CONTRARY EVIDENCE TO TURN DOWN THE CLAIM. WHAT EVIDENCE
DOES THE SIBLINGS PRESENTED?