Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download How Children Develop Canadian 5th Edition Siegler Test Bank PDF Full Chapter
Full Download How Children Develop Canadian 5th Edition Siegler Test Bank PDF Full Chapter
By Jakob Bjerkens
THE WEATHER
This part does not contain any scientific accounts of the
meteorological observations undertaken by the expedition in King’s
Bay, during the flight or during the twenty-four days’ stay in 87° 43′—
this will be left for the scientific journals to publish. I shall only give
here a characterization of the “polar-weather” as it was during 1925
and what was done in order to determine the best date for the start.
What kind of weather conditions must the flyers have for their
journey towards the Pole?
First of all there must be no fog at the place where they have to
land. Even if there is only a fog-belt extending a few meters above the
ground, a landing is impossible and a “forced-landing” would almost
certainly end in a catastrophe.
Further, the flyers must avoid passing through thick snow. The two
flying-machines might easily lose sight of each other, and if, in order to
keep in contact with each other, they should fly close together, there is
always the danger of a collision.
An overcast sky without rainfall is also useless. At least it must
clear now and again sufficiently to make it possible to navigate by the
sun. It is of course known that steering by the magnetic compass is
very uncertain so far north, as the extent of the deviations in the Arctic
is not sufficiently known.
Luckily so much is known about the weather in the polar ice region
that it is possible to choose in advance the most suitable time of year
for a polar flight. First of all, Nansen’s expedition by the “Fram” in
1893–1896 has given us this knowledge about the polar weather.
During almost the entire time of their drift across the Arctic
observations were made nearly every two hours in the course of the
day, so that a singularly rich stock of information exists. The
observations have been thoroughly gone through by the late Professor
H. Mohn, so that we have got them set out now in a most perspicuous
form. Both the observers’ and Professor Mohn’s calculations are
published in the work, “The Norwegian North Polar Expedition XVII
Meteorology.”
In January 14
„ February 12
„ March 9
„ April 8
„ May 7
„ June 0
„ July 0
„ August 0
„ September 0
„ October 4
„ November 11
„ December 15
In January 11
„ February 11
„ March 13
„ April 13
„ May 20
„ June 20
„ July 21
„ August 19
„ September 22
„ October 14
„ November 9
„ December 9
Therefore one can count that two-thirds of all the days from May to
September have rain or snow-falls. In the winter time, on the other
hand, only one-third of the days have downpours.
Fog—the flyer’s worst enemy—also collects during the summer
half of the year. Foggy days on an average were:
In January 0
„ February 0
„ March 2
„ April 1
„ May 2
„ June 10
„ July 20
„ August 16
„ September 10
„ October 4
„ November 1
„ December 0
One is therefore pretty sure to be without fog until May, but from
June to September it is general. First, in October the fog begins to get
less and then disappears altogether in the middle of winter.
It appears quite clearly from the “Fram” observations that only the
dark period of the year has somewhat stable weather conditions, with
a clear sky. During the light period of the year the weather is gray and
thick.
These conditions are as unfavorable as possible for all flying
expeditions towards the Pole. The good weather during the winter—
October to March—cannot be taken advantage of on account of the
darkness, and it is necessary to be satisfied with the much more
unfavorable weather during the lighter period of the year.
Luckily there is, however, an intermediate condition of weather,
when the light is still there, but the summer’s gray weather has not yet
set in properly. April with its eight clear weather days, seventeen days
without downpours, and only one foggy day ought to offer the best
conditions for flying. Only one has to remember that when flying over a
longer distance the chances of getting into ugly weather are much
greater than one would imagine from the impression given by the
figures. In a distance of an extent equaling that from Spitzbergen to the
Pole, during a good month such as April, one will in most cases have
to pass through a bad and good weather-zone. In April, too, one has to
reckon with severe cold. “Fram” had a temperature as low as -38° 4 c.
in the month of April and even at the end of that month it can go down
to -29° c. If it is, therefore, one’s intention to fly on a day of good
weather, it is necessary to be well protected against the severe cold.
In 1925 the polar flight could not be undertaken as early as April.
Notwithstanding the fact that the journey from Norway was undertaken
before the real opening of the shipping season, and that the
preparations in King’s Bay proceeded quickly and according to
program, our machines were not ready to start until the beginning of
May. An earlier start might well have been possible if the previous
winter had been spent in Spitzbergen.
It was the business of the meteorologists to determine which was
the best day in the month of May for the start. With “Fram’s”
experiences before us the prospects of finding a good starting day
were not very rosy. In May, 1896, when “Fram” was about halfway
between Spitzbergen and the Pole, there were twenty-five days with
rainfall, and only three days at the beginning of the month had clear
weather. Should May, 1925, turn out just as bad as May, 1896, the
polar flight would take place under very risky meteorological
conditions.
What resources were now at our disposal to determine what kind
of weather was expected? First were the telegrams from the stations in
the neighborhood, indicating the kind of weather which was
approaching. This system is commonly used by all meteorological
institutions which have something to do with weather reports, and it
was therefore only natural that this should be made use of for the polar
flight. One can, however, know beforehand that to make weather
forecasts at Spitzbergen is much more difficult than at other places
where it has been tried before. For instance, Southern Europe is
covered by a network of telegraph stations which can report the
approaching weather. But in Spitzbergen it is not so easy. The network
of European stations certainly give reports of every condition
approaching from the south, but no telegraphic weather reports can be
obtained from the west, north, or east. There are, therefore, many
situations where the meteorologists, notwithstanding all the aid, can
give no reply to the question: “What will the weather be like to-
morrow?”
And that is the case in Spitzbergen. But the polar flight had to be
undertaken from there, and had to extend more than 1,000 kilometers
above unknown regions in unknown weather conditions! How could
any one guarantee good weather for the whole distance?
I know that many meteorologists would reply to such a question
that this is beyond science. To prophesy what the weather will be like
near the Pole is pure guesswork. As now and again stress has been
put upon this view in the press, may I be permitted to defend the
foolhardiness I showed by venturing to tackle this problem? I admit
that it is very often quite impossible to say what the weather will be like
on the way from Spitzbergen to the Pole, and still less possible to
predict how it is likely to turn out in a day or two’s time. But
meteorology allows us to determine by indirect conclusions whether
the prospects of good weather are bright or whether the situation is too
risky. That these weather forecasts are based on very weak
foundations, and therefore can easily turn out wrong, was known by
the airmen from the first hour. Still they preferred to follow the advice
science could give, even if it was often vaguely formulated and given
with all sorts of provisos.
The plan was not to risk a flight in any case through fog and thick
snow, where the aeroplanes would certainly lose sight of each other,
but to turn back if the weather should begin to look too threatening. It
would then be the meteorologists’ problem to find another occasion
when it would be again worth while to try and see whether in a
renewed attempt the way to the Pole would be clear.
For several years the exchange of meteorological weather reports
had been broadcast by wireless so that everybody who had a receiving
apparatus could make free use of the same. “Fram’s” receiving
apparatus was of the latest type and worked very well, even receiving
meteorological messages from countries very far distant. Mr. Devoid
attended to the receiving of nearly all the weather reports—a job he
was well acquainted with, through his position as assistant at the
Geophysical Institute at Tromsö. It can safely be said that we could not
have got a better man for the handling of all the radio weather news
which came to hand. He was untiring in trying to pick up and read
communications which were very weak, coming from far distant
stations, and it was, thanks to him, that the weather forecasting station
at King’s Bay was able to work with nearly the same full range of
meteorological observations as any southern weather forecasting
station.
The meteorological despatches are broadcast by international
agreement and, with one single apparatus, one can receive accounts
of observations from the whole of Europe, North America and North
Asia. That has been made possible by the various countries all having
come to an agreement, in which they have arranged to send
despatches following each other closely according to a prearranged
time-table. On the “Fram” we regularly received the following
despatches:
p.m.
2:12Tromsö (+ polar station Jan Mayen, Björnöya)
2:20Königswusterhausen (Germany)
2:35Lyngby (Denmark)
2:40Karlsborg (Sweden)
2:50Oslo (Norway)
3:00London (England and Faroe Islands)
3:15Grudziadz (Poland)
3:20Paris (France, Switzerland, Belgium, Holland)
3:30Sandhamn (Finland)
3:50London (collected messages)
4:00Tromsö (collected messages)
5:00Paris (collected messages)
5:45Oslo (Norwegian observations 5 o’clock)
5:50London (English observations 5 o’clock)
6:30Stavanger (repetition of Annapolis, U.S.A.)
p.m.
7:12Tromsö (+ polar station Jan Mayen, Björnöya)
7:20Königswusterhausen (Germany)
7:35Lyngby (Denmark)
7:40Karlsborg (Sweden)
7:50Oslo (Norway)
8:00London (England and Faroe Islands)
8:15Grudziadz (Poland)
8:20Paris (France, Switzerland, Belgium, Holland)
8:30Sandhamn (Finland)
8:40London (ships’ observations)
8:50Tromsö (collected messages)
9:15Haapsalu (Estland)
10:00Paris (collected messages)
THE COURSE OF THE SHIPS ON WATCH, “FRAM” AND “HOBBY,” DURING THE
COURSE OF THE EXPEDITION
The dotted area indicates the pack ice.
Furthermore, in the English, French and Norwegian despatches
there were a certain number of observations from ships in the Atlantic,
which in themselves formed a bridge between the American and
European stations. The whole station system therefore formed an
almost complete circle round the polar regions, with the exception of
Northeast Siberia, where telegraphic communications are still bad, and
this of course makes a wide gap.