Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Project
Legal Project
on
Cunsumer protection act, 2019
Submitted By:
Sanvi Srivastava
Sanyam Pal
Shivam Singh
Shivangi
Shubham Sandilya
Vivek Dubey
Certificate
This is to certify that, Group-10 of MBA Sem-1, Sec-11 has successfully
completed the project titled consumer protection act,2019 under my guidance
for the Academic Year 202324. The information submitted is true and original
as per my knowledge.
Title Page
Introduction
Defination
Misleading advertisment
E-Consumer
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
The Consumer Protection Act of 2019 is an Indian legislation aimed at safeguarding the
rights of consumers and providing a framework for the protection of their interests. It
replaced the earlier Consumer Protection Act of 1986, aiming to address contemporary
challenges in consumer protection. This act focuses on enhancing consumer rights,
establishing mechanisms for quicker redressal of consumer grievances, and introducing
stringent measures against unfair trade practices and misleading advertisements. It also
establishes Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissions at the district, state, and national
levels to handle consumer complaints efficiently. The Consumer
Protection Act of 2019 in India is designed to strengthen consumer rights, expedite
grievance redressal, combat unfair trade practices, and regulate misleading advertisements.
It establishes various levels of Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissions for swift resolution
of consumer complaints and aims to provide greater protection and empowerment to
consumers in the marketplace.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 was introduced in the Lok Sabha as a replacement of
COPRA, 1986 on 8 July 2019 by the Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public
Distribution, Ram Vilas Paswan.[1] It was passed by Lok Sabha on 30 July 2019[2] and later
passed in Rajya Sabha on 6 August 2019
DEFINATION
CONSUMER
Section 2(7) of the act defined, Consumer is an individual who purchases goods or services
for personal use or consumption and not for resale or commercial purposes. In the context
of consumer protection laws, a consumer is someone who buys products or utilizes services
for their own use, which may include tangible goods, services, utilities, or digital products.
SERVICES
Service refers to an intangible action, performance, or assistance provided by one party to
another. In a business context, services are activities, efforts, or tasks performed to fulfill a
particular need or desire of a customer or client, often involving skill, expertise, or labor.
Service is an intangible benefit availed by the consumer from the service provider. On a
daily basis, we all humans hire different services. Term service is defined under Section 2(42)
of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which include facilities related to banking, financing,
insurance, telecom, processing, transport, etc. Service doesn’t include any free service, it
should be in paid form.
Illustrations:
DEFICIENCY IN SERVICES
According to Section 2(11) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (“the Act”),
deficiency is any sort of fault, imperfection, shortcoming or defect in the feature,
quality, amount, nature, worth, authenticity, capacity and standard which is
obligatory to be maintained and regulated as per the laws and statutes in function or
any agreement/contract claimed by the seller, with respect to the products and
goods. Including any act of negligence, omission or commission by the seller which
causes loss to the consumer, which a prudent seller is supposed to do or is supposed
to omit, but deliberately does the contrary, such actions amount to ‘deficiency of
service’. These definitions help to understand the clear meaning of deficiency in
services. Whenever there is any sort of deficiency in services, the customer is
exploited which impacts and causes loss of money. Any kind of negligence or
omission or commission can cause injury to consumers.
Any act of negligence or omission or commission by such person which causes loss or
injury to the consumer; and
Deliberate withholding of relevant information by such person to the consumer.
DEFECTS
Defect: Defect means any fault, imperfection or shortcoming in the quality,
under any law for the time being in force or under any contract, express or
unfair trade practices and deficiencies in goods and services. This multi-tiered structure
ensures that consumers have access to a speedy resolution of their disputes.
4. E-Commerce Regulation
With the proliferation of e-commerce, the act recognizes the need to regulate online
transactions and protect consumers in the digital space. It introduces provisions that govern
e-commerce entities, ensuring transparency, proper information disclosure, and
accountability in online transactions. This objective aligns with the changing consumer
behavior and the increasing significance of online commerce.
5. Product Liability
The act introduces the concept of product liability, holding manufacturers, sellers, and
service providers accountable for any harm caused to consumers due to defective products
or deficient services. This objective aims to enhance product safety and quality, encouraging
businesses to ensure that their offerings meet the necessary standards and do not pose risks
to consumers.
1: Right to Safety: Consumers have the right to protection against goods and services
that are hazardous to health or life. This includes access to information about the risks
associated with products
Before purchasing, consumers should insist on the quality of the products as well as on the
guarantee of the products and services. They should preferably purchase quality marked
products such as ISI, AGMARK, etc.
2. Right to Information: Consumers have the right to be informed about the quality,
quantity, potency, purity, standard, and price of goods or services to make informed
decisions.
Consumer should insist on getting all the information about the product or service before
making a choice or a decision. This will enable him to desisit from falling prey to high
pressure selling techniques.
3. Right to be assured: The consumer has the freedom to access variety of products at
competitive prices. Thisimplies that the marketers should offer a wide variety of products in
terms of quality, brand, prices, size, etc. and allow the consumer to make a choice from
amongst these.
4. Right to be heard: The consumer has a right to file a complaint and to be heard in case
of dissatisfaction with a good or a service. It is because of this reason that many enlightened
business firms have set up their own consumer service and grievance cells. Many consumer
organisations are also working towards this direction and helping consumers in
redressal of their grievances.
5. Right to Redressal: Means right to seek redressal against unfair trade practices or
unscrupulous exploitation of consumers. It also includes right to fair settlement of the
These rights aim to empower consumers, promote fair trade practices, and ensure their
1. False Representation: Making false or misleading claims about the nature, quality, or
standard of goods or services.
3. Unfair Contract Terms: Including unfair or biased terms in contracts, which puts
consumers at a disadvantage.
5. Charging Excessive Prices: Charging a price higher than the set limit or the market
value of the product or service.
These unfair trade practices are prohibited under the Consumer Protection Act to safeguard
consumers from exploitation and ensure fair dealings between consumers and businesses
MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT
Misleading advertisement in relation to any product or service, means an advertisement,
which-
(2) Gives a false guarantee to, or is likely to mislead the consumers as to the nature,
substance, quantity or quality of such product or service; or
of 2019 , such councils typically have several key powers and responsibilities :
E-CONSUMERS
"E-consumer" typically refers to a consumer who engages in transactions, purchases, or
interactions through electronic means, such as the internet, mobile applications, or other
digital platform
:
1. Protecting E-Consumer Rights Parliament aims to ensure that consumers
engaging in online transactions have similar rights and protections as those
purchasing goods or services through traditional means. This involves safeguarding
e-consumers' rights to accurate information, fair treatment, redress in case of
disputes, and protection of personal data.
1. Adapting to Technological Advancements: Recognizing the changing
landscape of commerce, lawmakers intend to adapt legislation to keep pace with
technological advancements. The inclusion of provisions for e-consumers aims to
address the unique challenges and risks associated with online transactions, such as
data security, fraudulent practices, and ensuring trust in online marketplaces.
SERVICES
A real-life example of a service is a ride-sharing platform like Uber, where
users can request transportation services through a mobile app, and drivers
provide the service by picking them up and taking them to their destination.
Another example of a service is a streaming platform like Netflix, where users
subscribe to access a vast library of movies and TV shows for on-demand
streaming. The service provides entertainment content to users over the
internet.
DEFICIENCY IN SERVICES
Inappropriate treatment done by a doctor leading to an
increase in patient’s suffering is the deficiency in service.
A customer buys a ticket for an AC bus. But the AC of the
bus does not work, which is a deficiency of service.
DEFECTS IN SERVICES
Software with bugs that has to be re-coded
Misdiagnoses in healthcare that lead to unnecessary tests
or treatment
Products that are shipped to the wrong address
Manufactured items that don't meet the customer's
specifications
Incorrect data entry
Information that isn't communicated effectively or well
understood
CASE.
FACTS
In this case, the appellant had purchased a second - hand truck under a Hire Purchase
agreement. The vehicle was insured by the respondent insurance company. One day when
he was driving the truck, a passenger asked him to stop the truck and give him a lift. When
he stopped the truck, the passenger brutally assaulted the driver and fled with the vehicle.
An FIR was lodged and the respondent finance company was intimated about the theft.
However, the insurance company rejected the claim on the ground of breach of terms of the
policy. The complainant approached District Consumer Disputes Forum, State Commission
and National Commission to compensate him for the loss. All of them had rejected the case.
So, finally he approached the Supreme Court.
ISSUE
The insurance company contended that the driver of the truck had violated the terms of the
policy by providing a lift to the passengers, and as a result, there was breach of policy and
the insurance company was not liable. The District Forum accepted this contention and
rejected the claim of the owner-complainant. The District Forum also rejected the claim on
the ground that the arbitration proceedings had been initiated by the finance company
against the complainant and they were at the final stage. The claimant then filed an appeal
before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and this appeal was also denied
and then the claimant filed revision before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission but it was also rejected. Finally, he filed an appeal to the Supreme Court.
JUDGEMENT
The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not at all in fault. It can be considered as a
breach of the policy, but not a fundamental breach to bring the insurance policy to an end
and terminate the insurance policy. The two - judge bench of Supreme Court directed the
respondent insurance company to pay 75% of the insured amount along with 9% interest
p.a. from the date of filing the claim. The court also directed the insurance company to
paysum of Rs. 1,00,000 as compensation.
FACT
The case had gone into appeal. The appellant's Mother took a locker on rent in the
Deshapriya Park, Kolkata Branch of the respondent bank. The appellant/complainant was
included as a joint holder of the locker. The appellant visited the respondent bank to
operate the locker and deposit the locker rent. However, the appellant was informed that
the bank had broken open his locker for non-payment of rent dues. Further, that the locker
had subsequently been reallocated to another customer. When the appellant went to
collect the contents of the locker, he found only two of the seven ornaments that had been
deposited in the locker in a non-sealed envelope. However, the respondent bank contended
that only those two ornaments were found in the appellant's locker when it was broken
open. That the same is evident from the inventory prepared by the respondent. When the
locker was broken open in the presence of an independent witness. Subsequently, the
appellant filed a consumer complaint before the District Consumer Forum.
JUDGEMENT
Furthermore, on appeal, the Supreme Court issued guidelines on allotting and operating of
lockers and the court held that banks will be liable under the Consumer Protection Act for
deficiencies in locker services. In the light of these case laws, we can see that the issue of
deficiency in services has mostly been interpreted by the courts in the favour of consumers
and high significance has been attached with the kind of services that companies provide.
Judgment:
In this case, Supreme Court gave his rulings. The Supreme Court mentioned the General
Clause Act that includes a private company within the purview of the definition of a
“Person.” It was also held that the supply of electricity by the KPTC to a consumer would be
covered under Section 2(1)(o) being ‘service.’ Also, if the electrical energy consumer is not
provided to a consumer in time as is agreed upon, then under Section (2)(1)(g), then there
can be a case for deficiency in service. Therefore, the clause stating “supply” of goods for
commercial purpose would not be applied. The Supreme Court sent this case back to District
Forum for retrial on these grounds.
CONCLUSION
I can conclude that very few consumers are fully aware about the rights, responsibilities and
Consumer Protection Act. Hence, it is necessary to educate them on their rights and
responsibilities as consumers, to make then vigilant. rational and aware buyers. The
government has been fruitful in. providing protection to the consumers in the real sense of
the term and served the purpose of the Act. It is hoped that further improvement in the act
would aim at even more efficiency and render the position of the consumers much stronger
in this era of globalization and privatization where the sudden unchecked advent of Multi
National Companies has to be balanced with the protection of the rights of the consumers
by the legislature and the judiciary.