Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 46

In vivo characterization

of Biomaterials

TEB 2020-2021
Soledad Perez Amodio
§ In vivo testing of Biomaterials

2
§ Why in vivo testing?
Limitations of in vitro testing:

§ They cannot recreate the complex in vivo environment


§ Immune reaction
§ Functional properties of the scaffold can not be studied
§ Role of angiogenesis in newly formed tissue

3
§ Animal Models

Living organism that in one or more anatomical or physiological aspects


can be compared with the healthy or diseased man because of the reaction
upon external stimuli.

4
In vivo tests
§ Sensitization (ISO 10993-10:2010): guinea pig maximization test
(GPMT), guinea pig closed patch or Buehler and local lymph node assay
(LLNA).

§ Irritation (ISO 10993-10:2010): skin, ocular, mucous membrane and


intracutaneous assays.

§ Systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11:2006): acute, subacute, sub- chronic,


and chronic

§ Implantation (ISO 10993-6:2007): muscle, subcutaneous tissue, bone.

5
§ Choosing the animal model

6
Animal models

7
Rodents (Rats and Mice)
§ Widely used in all fields of tissue engineering research.
§ Moderate costs and ease of care.
§ Study of biological features of cells and engineered tissues,
preliminary proof-of-concept experiments.
§ Commercially available rodent strains are highly standardized.
§ Due to the small size of the animals surgical procedures are
difficult to perform: results cannot easily be transferred to
humans.

8
9
Pigs
§ Similar anatomy, physiology and immunology to that of
humans
§ Uncooperative with full general anaesthetic
§ Capable of rapid growth: limited time TE construct
assessment
§ Surgical and anaesthesiologic skills required to perform
operations
§ Strain to reduce final body size and rate of growth: Minipigs

10
Dogs

§ Convenient size (10–30 kg), ease of care and modest growth


rates.

§ Ethical considerations raised particularly in Western countries.

§ Dogs bred specifically for experimental research: beagles,


foxhounds, Labradors.

11
Rabbits

§ Ready available, relatively cheap and easy to maintain.

§ Surgical procedures difficult as compared with larger animals.

§ Comparable to other rodents, the transfer of research results to humans


is not be easily accomplished.

12
Primates
§ Apes and monkeys: the animal model most closely resembling human
anatomy and physiology.
§ Slow and predictable rate of growth: suitable for experiments
determining the long-term behaviour of tissue engineered grafts.
§ Ethical and legal restrictions.
§ Excessive costs in care and feeding.

13
§ Costs of animal models

14
§ Advantages and dissadvantages of in vivo animal models

15
Examples of in vivo testing biomaterials

§ Inflammation and host reaction

16
§ Bone regeneration § Cartilage repair

17
§ Non-invasive in vivo characterization of biomaterials

In vivo optical bioluminescence imaging (BLI)

18
Zebrafish embryo
§ Optical transparency allows real time visualization
§ Suitable for studying innate response: innate immune system similar to mammals
§ High fertility: large number of embryos
§ Easy and cheap maintenance: 100-fold reduced cost than for mice

19
Transgenic Zebrafish

Macrophages (green)
Neutrophils (red).

20
Chicken embryo
§ Chick Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay

Vascular membrane found in eggs of birds and reptiles.

21
Chicken embryo development

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22
Advantages of CAM model

§ Highly vascularized nature

§ High reproducibility

§ Simplicity

§ Cost-and time- efficient

§ Naturally immunodeficient host

23
IN-ovo and ex-ovo CAM assay
In-ovo Ex-ovo

24
IN-ovo and ex-ovo CAM assay

25
§ Angiogenic capacity of biomaterials

26
27
§ Ethical issues

Unhatched birds are not considered living animals by


national legislations worldwide

Experiments performed on avian embryos seem to be


ethically more tolerable than those on rodents

28
ANIMAL WELFARE

29
Ethical concerns relevant to the use of animals in Tissue Engineering
§ Is the animal model relevant to human physiology?

§ Is the experiment well-designed and outcome sufficiently important so


that the data obtained will justify the suffering and sacrifice of the life
of a living creature?

30
§ Legislation for the protection of animals used for research

31
§ Before experiments on animals are conducted, the research protocol must be
reviewed by animal ethics committees. The guiding principle of these
committees is usually the 3 Rs.
§ All researchers handling the animals used for experimentation should also be
trained in handling the particular species in the study

32
Animal welfare and the three Rs

The guiding principles supporting the humane


use of animals:

§ Replacement
§ Reduction
§ Refinement

33
§ Replacement

Animal experiments must be replaced wherever possible


by other methods.

§ Statistical data already obtained from animal research


§ Studies of isolated cells and tissues
§ Computer models that simulate an animal’s response to specific
experiments
§ Studies of patients and populations

34
Examples

§ Test using bacteria instead of rodents to see whether a chemical is


likely to damage DNA or has potential to cause cancer.

§ Scientists can check injected medicines for most pyrogens (fever-


causing bacterial contaminants) by using blood cells– replacing
tests on rabbits.

35
§ Refinement

§ Refine the way experiments are carried out.

§ Better housing.

§ Improvements to procedures which minimise pain and suffering.

36
§ Examples

§ Food rewards can be used to train monkeys to sit on weighing scales,


or hold out a limb to give a blood sample – reducing any stress.

§ Blood pressure, heart rate and activity levels can be measured


by radio-operated implants, so that animals do not have to be
repeatedly caught or restrained.

§ Rodents can be housed in a special red plastic ‘house’ so they


feel they’re nesting in a dark place (they can’t see through red), yet
it allows them to be seen and studied.

§ Animals are routinely kept in social groups and given stimulating


environments.
37
§ Reduction

§ Reduce the number of animals used to a minimum.

§ Obtain information from fewer animals.

§ Obtain more information from the same number of animals.

38
§ Examples

§ Statistical analysis ensure that researchers use the


optimum number of animals.

§ Using inbred animals means researchers can get reliable


results from fewer of them.

§ New scanning techniques: tumours can be


tracked non-invasively (more data collected from the same animal).

39
Alternative to animal testing
§ TE for modelling human physiology
Creation of in vitro human models to identify the factors that drive cellular processes

Skin wound healing

40
§ Organ-on-a-chip

41
§ Computer (in silico) Modeling

Simulated prevascularized scaffolds

42
§ Cellular in vitro models

Cancer models 3D hepatocyte cultures

43
§ Organoids

44
§ Bioprinted tissues

45
46

You might also like