Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Vivo Characterization of Biomaterials
In Vivo Characterization of Biomaterials
of Biomaterials
TEB 2020-2021
Soledad Perez Amodio
§ In vivo testing of Biomaterials
2
§ Why in vivo testing?
Limitations of in vitro testing:
3
§ Animal Models
4
In vivo tests
§ Sensitization (ISO 10993-10:2010): guinea pig maximization test
(GPMT), guinea pig closed patch or Buehler and local lymph node assay
(LLNA).
5
§ Choosing the animal model
6
Animal models
7
Rodents (Rats and Mice)
§ Widely used in all fields of tissue engineering research.
§ Moderate costs and ease of care.
§ Study of biological features of cells and engineered tissues,
preliminary proof-of-concept experiments.
§ Commercially available rodent strains are highly standardized.
§ Due to the small size of the animals surgical procedures are
difficult to perform: results cannot easily be transferred to
humans.
8
9
Pigs
§ Similar anatomy, physiology and immunology to that of
humans
§ Uncooperative with full general anaesthetic
§ Capable of rapid growth: limited time TE construct
assessment
§ Surgical and anaesthesiologic skills required to perform
operations
§ Strain to reduce final body size and rate of growth: Minipigs
10
Dogs
11
Rabbits
12
Primates
§ Apes and monkeys: the animal model most closely resembling human
anatomy and physiology.
§ Slow and predictable rate of growth: suitable for experiments
determining the long-term behaviour of tissue engineered grafts.
§ Ethical and legal restrictions.
§ Excessive costs in care and feeding.
13
§ Costs of animal models
14
§ Advantages and dissadvantages of in vivo animal models
15
Examples of in vivo testing biomaterials
16
§ Bone regeneration § Cartilage repair
17
§ Non-invasive in vivo characterization of biomaterials
18
Zebrafish embryo
§ Optical transparency allows real time visualization
§ Suitable for studying innate response: innate immune system similar to mammals
§ High fertility: large number of embryos
§ Easy and cheap maintenance: 100-fold reduced cost than for mice
19
Transgenic Zebrafish
Macrophages (green)
Neutrophils (red).
20
Chicken embryo
§ Chick Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay
21
Chicken embryo development
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22
Advantages of CAM model
§ High reproducibility
§ Simplicity
23
IN-ovo and ex-ovo CAM assay
In-ovo Ex-ovo
24
IN-ovo and ex-ovo CAM assay
25
§ Angiogenic capacity of biomaterials
26
27
§ Ethical issues
28
ANIMAL WELFARE
29
Ethical concerns relevant to the use of animals in Tissue Engineering
§ Is the animal model relevant to human physiology?
30
§ Legislation for the protection of animals used for research
31
§ Before experiments on animals are conducted, the research protocol must be
reviewed by animal ethics committees. The guiding principle of these
committees is usually the 3 Rs.
§ All researchers handling the animals used for experimentation should also be
trained in handling the particular species in the study
32
Animal welfare and the three Rs
§ Replacement
§ Reduction
§ Refinement
33
§ Replacement
34
Examples
35
§ Refinement
§ Better housing.
36
§ Examples
38
§ Examples
39
Alternative to animal testing
§ TE for modelling human physiology
Creation of in vitro human models to identify the factors that drive cellular processes
40
§ Organ-on-a-chip
41
§ Computer (in silico) Modeling
42
§ Cellular in vitro models
43
§ Organoids
44
§ Bioprinted tissues
45
46