Mapua Malayan Colleges Of Laguna

School of Architecture
Past and Present 18 /25%
Virtues and Values of Architect 20 /25%
The Architects Role in Society 20 /25%
References 22 /25%
80 /100%
ARC182
Professional Practice 2

RE: 100

Submitted by:

Jerone G. Relampagos
A71

Date Submitted:
12/22/23

Submitted to:

Ar. Don De Vera, uap

I. Past and Present

a. Important Issues and Concern

As a multifaceted field, architecture addresses a wide range of issues that impact

how people interact with and experience spaces as well as form the built
environment. In addition to reflecting practical and aesthetic concerns, the field is
intricately linked to larger societal, environmental, and technical issues. In his famous
words, "As an architect, you design for the present, with an awareness of the past,
for a future which is essentially unknown" (Foster, 2007), famed architect Norman
Foster said it well. This emphasizes how architecture is dynamic and how it may
solve modern issues while still honoring historical settings.

Sustainability is one of the most important design considerations in contemporary

architecture, reflecting public awareness of environmental challenges. According to
renowned architect Ken Yeang, "Sustainability should be viewed as a strategy for
survival and not just as an altruistic aspiration" (Yeang, 2012), he underlines this. The
need to lessen the effects of climate change and the built environment's carbon
footprint has made it necessary to develop ecologically conscious designs.

Social equality is a critical factor that influences architectural discourse in addition to

environmental considerations. According to renowned architect and urban theorist
Jan Gehl, "Cities must be planned for people, and it is through people that their value
can be defined" (Gehl, 2010). This highlights the significance of developing
accessible and inclusive spaces that serve a variety of communities, promote social
cohesion, and address issues of inequality.

Furthermore, new materials and digital tools are impacting design processes, which
is changing the possibilities in architecture. According to Pritzker Prize-winning
architect Zaha Hadid, "I think that architecture is about ideas, not materials. It's about
the quality of spaces and the quality of life" (Hadid, 2003). Technology integration
gives architects the freedom to experiment and develop fresh ideas that improve a
building's functional and visual qualities.

Stability and Structural Integrity

During the past, the important concerns in Architecture lies directly to structural
stability, innovation, cultural symbolism,and aesthetics. Throughout architecture
history, maintaining a building's structural integrity while pursuing new creative
frontiers has been of utmost importance. Architects have always struggled with the
balance between firmitas (firmness) and utilitas (commodity) in their designs, as
Vitruvius famously stated in "De architectura," with the goal of creating structures that
endure both materially and artistically through time.

In the past, architects faced the difficult task of trying to be innovative while still
making sure their designs were stable. Ancient civilizations' architectural wonders,
like Rome's Pantheon, are examples of how well structural stability and creative
design may be combined. The Pantheon's dome, with its ground-breaking use of
concrete and distinctive oculus, is a prime example of how the ancient builders were
able to push the limits of engineering without sacrificing structural integrity (Fletcher,
1991).

Cultural Symbolism and Significance

Architectural history has long been shaped by the investigation of cultural symbolism
and meaning, which has resulted in buildings that are more than just practical; they
are long-lasting representations of societal values, identities, and beliefs. As a
cultural artifact, architecture acts as a blank canvas onto which a community's
narratives and goals can be inscribed. "Architecture, it is to be hoped, will
increasingly reflect the complexities of a multicultural society and a much broader
palette of human values," as architectural historian Spiro Kostof pointed out astutely
(Kostof, 1995). This realization emphasizes how historically significant architecture
has been in expressing cultural variation and promoting a feeling of self.

Civilizations have used architecture to convey their cultural ethos throughout history.
The elaborate mosques of Islamic architecture expressed a blend of spiritual and
artistic values, while the magnificence of ancient Egyptian temples represented the
society's veneration for deities and the afterlife. According to famous architect Le
Corbusier, "The history of architecture is the history of the struggle for light"
(Corbusier, 1987). In this conflict, light takes on a metaphorical meaning that
represents spirituality, enlightenment, and cultural enlightenment in addition to being
a physical element.

The use of cultural symbolism in architecture has changed in more recent years in
response to the problems posed by cultural homogenization and globalization. This
complexity was brought to light by architectural theorist Homi K. Bhabha, who said
that "cultural diversity is both the inheritance of humanity and the guarantee of its
continuing creativity" (Bhabha, 1996).

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

The modern architectural profession is highly conscious of the need for sustainable
design and the reduction of environmental effect. Today's architects struggle with the
pressing need to use creative and environmentally responsible design techniques to
address resource depletion, ecological deterioration, and climate change. According
to the eminent architect and urban planner Jan Gehl, "Cities that have placed the
understanding of life at the center of all considerations" are sustainable (Gehl, 2010).
This emphasizes the difficulty architects face today in giving sustainable concepts
that balance with the environment first priority.

The current conversation in architecture about sustainable design is characterized by

a greater focus on the carbon footprint of buildings and the energy inherent in
building materials. The statement "The materials we choose and how we use them
play a crucial role in shaping the environmental impact of buildings" (Willis, 2017) is
emphasized by architectural historian Daniel Willis. As a result of this realization,
choosing environmentally friendly materials, encouraging energy efficiency, and
putting sustainable construction techniques into practice are becoming increasingly
important in lowering the total environmental effect of architectural projects.

In addition, in order to develop self-sufficient structures, modern architects are

progressively incorporating renewable energy sources, including solar and wind
power, into their plans. An advocate of sustainable design, Norman Foster said, "We
need to harness the potential of sustainable design to mitigate the environmental
impact of the built environment" (Foster, 2010). Foster is a well-known architect. This
acknowledgement highlights the contemporary dedication to use technology and
innovative design to produce buildings that actively contribute to the production of
clean energy while also consuming fewer resources.

Inclusivity

The current state of architecture is characterized by a strong emphasis on inclusivity

and social responsibility, which is a reflection of the dedication to designing built
environments that are egalitarian, accessible, and sensitive to the many needs of
communities. The words "The aesthetics of social justice is where we need to push
the boundaries in our profession" (Cruz, 2019) were eloquently expressed by
 architect and urban designer Teddy Cruz. This captures the modern issue facing
architects, which is to actively engage in the design of environments that address
social disparities and promote inclusivity while moving beyond conventional
paradigms.

Architects are becoming more aware of the demands of various groups as they
realize the significant influence that the built environment has on social dynamics.
The notion of universal design has gained popularity, aiming to build environments
that are usable by everyone, irrespective of age, aptitude, or socioeconomic
background. Architect and author Karen Kubey, in her own words, states that "design
is a powerful tool for social justice. It can either work to undo inequality or perpetuate
it" (2022). This indicates a change in emphasis toward design solutions that promote
inclusion and social cohesiveness.

The necessity of community interaction in the design process is also emphasized in

this debate. In order to comprehend local communities' distinct requirements, goals,
and cultural settings, architects are working in partnership with them. The statement
"The best design comes from deep collaboration and engagement with the people
who live in the communities we are working to serve" was aptly made by urban
planner and architect Toni L. Griffin (Griffin, 2019). By working together, it is ensured
that architectural interventions represent the identities and voices of the communities
they serve rather than being forced.

Furthermore, sustainability is being recognized by the architecture profession as a

social responsibility issue as well as an environmental one. Recognizing the
significant influence of the built environment on community well-being and economic
stability, architects are working to design reasonably priced and energy-efficient
housing. This echoes the opinion of architect Moshe Safdie, who said that
"architecture has the power to transform people's lives" (Safdie, 2019).

b. The Architect and Law

Spanish Influence

The built environment in the Philippines was significantly shaped by the interaction of
law and architecture during the Spanish colonial era. Spanish colonization left behind
a unique architectural history that was shaped by indigenous and European elements
alike, with legislative structures playing a major role in organizing and regulating
architectural practices.

Known by their Spanish colonial title, "maestros de obras," architects were essential
to the planning and execution of building projects. But compared to modern
conventions, the division between architects and builders was less strict. According
to architectural historian Gerard Lico, "the blending of roles in the construction
process was not only a result of economic considerations but also an
acknowledgment of the artisan's expertise in the actual execution of the plans" (Lico,
2013). This merging of the roles for design and construction was indicative of the
practical approach to architectural practices in this era.
During Spanish control, the Catholic Church was a powerful institution that had a
significant impact on architectural development through royal decrees and
ecclesiastical legislation. Religious orders played a major role in the development of
architecture, especially the Franciscans, Dominicans, Augustinians, and Jesuits. As
stated by José Regalado Trota (José, 1998), "the friars became the chief builders of
the Spanish colonial era". Church rules and regulations were a major influence in
determining how churches, convents, and similar buildings were built and
maintained.

American Period

The relationship between architecture and law changed significantly in the

Philippines between 1898 and 1946, while the United States was the colonial power
there. New legal and architectural paradigms were brought about by American
governance, which also shaped the built environment to reflect the goals and values
of the colonial power. The Public Works Act of 1901 established the foundation for
public construction projects and signaled a break from Spanish colonial policy. This
law was crucial in modernizing architectural practices, which reflected the shifting
institutional and cultural influences of the era, as well as in facilitating the adoption of
American architectural styles and engineering standards (Lico, 2013).

An important turning point in the history of architectural education was marked in

1910 with the founding of the University of the Philippines College of Architecture.
Established in the era of American colonization, this establishment played a pivotal
role in harmonizing architectural education with the rigorous academic standards of
the United States. Its impact went beyond the classroom, influencing Filipino
architects' professionalization and training (Lico, 2013).

The necessity of professional collaboration and advocacy became evident as

architectural education developed. Architects had a collective platform thanks to the
establishment of architectural organizations during this time, most notably the
Philippine Institute of Architects (PIA) in 1933. Being a trailblazing organization, the
PIA played a significant role in bringing professionals together, promoting knowledge
sharing, and defending the interests of the architectural community. A cohesive
professional community actively involved in influencing the architectural discourse in
the Philippines was established by this collaborative ethos (PIA, n.d.).

Professional collaboration and advocacy became increasingly important as

architectural education developed. A collective platform for architects was made
available by the rise of architectural organizations during this time, most notably the
Philippine Institute of Architects (PIA) in 1933. Being one of the first associations, the
PIA had a significant role in bringing professionals together, encouraging the sharing
of knowledge, and promoting the interests of the architectural community. This
culture of cooperation created the groundwork for a cohesive professional community
that actively participated in influencing Philippine architecture discourse (PIA, n.d.).

Essentially, the era of American colonialism in the Philippines witnessed a

revolutionary convergence of legal advancements, educational endeavors, and the
formation of expert associations. Together, these advancements had a lasting effect
on the architectural landscape by modernizing architectural methods, standardizing
education, and fostering a strong professional community.

Professional Regulation Commission

Republic Act No. 546 of 1950 established the PRC, which is in charge of
guaranteeing the professionalism, competence, and accountability of professionals in
the nation. The PRC continues to be the principal authority in the field of architecture,
mainly by means of the exams it administers. Architects seeking to become licensed
must pass these exams in order to prove that they possess the necessary
knowledge, skills, and adherence to professional standards. The PRC's supervision
of the licensing process helps to preserve the public interest and the standard of
architectural practice.

To get and keep their professional licenses, architects in the Philippines must abide
by the rules established by the PRC. Maintaining the standards of architectural
practice and making sure practitioners are qualified to offer professional services
need the PRC's participation in the licensing process.

Zoning and Environmental Regulations

The dual emphasis on environmental sustainability and zoning laws has a significant
impact on contemporary architectural practice, demonstrating a dedication to planned
and responsible urban growth. The ecological impact of architectural projects is
reduced in large part because to environmental restrictions. Important topics
including waste management, energy efficiency, and the use of sustainable materials
are covered.

Zoning laws are essential to the larger framework of land use planning and urban
development, supporting environmental concerns. Zoning laws, which define
particular zones for residential, commercial, industrial, and other uses, are enforced
by local government entities. These laws are crucial tools for preventing urban
sprawl, limiting the number of buildings, and promoting peaceful community
development. These zoning laws must be followed by architects in order for their
plans to comply with specified land use categories and support the creation of orderly
and sustainable urban environments.

Modern architects are emphasizing integration more and more in the early phases of
the design process in response to the growing significance of zoning and
environmental concerns. Working together with urban planners and environmental
specialists has become commonplace. Architects work hard to actively participate in
the local ecology and community dynamics in addition to following the law. By
working together, we can make sure that architectural projects benefit the
communities they serve in addition to being legally and environmentally sound.

This cogent strategy, which incorporates zoning and environmental concerns, is

indicative of a larger movement in architectural values toward sustainability,
 conscientious urban design, and a dedication to building structures that blend in with
their natural and social environments.

II. The Virtues and Values of an Architect

a. The Spectrum of the Architect’s Services

An architect's noble work is rooted in a complex dedication that goes beyond simple
design. As stated by Cuff (1991), this dedication is firmly anchored in the quest of artistic
sensibility and design excellence. Architects strive to improve the human experience in
the built world by designing environments that are innovative, harmonious, and beautiful.
This ageless quality attests to the architect's unwavering commitment to the craft's
craftsmanship.

Simultaneously, the virtue of ethical responsibility and professional integrity, as

emphasized by Harmon (2009), forms an integral part of an architect's ethical framework.
This commitment underscores the architect's responsibility to prioritize the safety,
well-being, and dignity of the occupants of the spaces they design. It serves as a guiding
principle that aids architects in navigating complex ethical dilemmas, ensuring the
upholding of the highest standards of professionalism.

Environmental stewardship is a critical attribute that is in line with the importance of

sustainability in the context of modern architecture (Papanek, 1995). Architects
understand how important it is to reduce the environmental impact of their designs, which
helps to fulfill the larger purpose of ecological responsibility. This dedication shows a
deep understanding of the architect's responsibility in creating a resilient and sustainable
future.

According to the value of cooperation and clear communication, architectural services

have evolved to include teamwork and multidisciplinary participation in addition to
individual creativity (Brawne, 2003). Architects understand the value of forming fruitful
collaborations with a range of stakeholders in order to guarantee that their vision is in
perfect harmony with the varied requirements of both communities and customers.

An architect with integrity also recognizes the social aspects of their work, guided by the
importance of community involvement (Irwin, 2014). This quality encourages architects to
embrace inclusion, comprehend cultural context, and create environments that have a
beneficial social impact. It emphasizes how careful and culturally aware architecture may
act as a catalyst for constructive social change, and this is the job of the architect.

b. The 3-D Wheel of Building Project

Architects' approach to the 3-D wheel of the project lifecycle is greatly influenced by a set
of virtues and ideals that guide them through the intricate and dynamic world of building
projects. The three main aspects of design, development, and delivery are covered by
this 3-D wheel, and the qualities and values of an architect are woven throughout this
iterative process.
Design Dimension

An essential component of architectural composition, spatial design carefully considers

how to best organize and arrange areas inside a building while maintaining maximum
flow and utility. Architect Francis D.K. Ching points out that form and function are
determined by how spaces are arranged, which affects how a place is experienced as a
whole (Ching, 2014).

Visual design explores both the interior and exterior aspects of a structure with an
emphasis on aesthetic components. The core of visual design is best captured by
architectural historian Robin Evans, who claims that architectural form is the result of the
synthesis of aesthetic and functional factors (Evans, 1997). This dimension aims to
design structures that are more than just useful; it wants to be aesthetically striking
demonstrations of architectural mastery.

Immersed in the world of user experience, experiential design takes comfort, ambience,
and ergonomics into account. By emphasizing how architecture frames human
experience and acts as a memory vessel, architect Juhani Pallasmaa masterfully
captures the value of the sensory experience (Pallasmaa, 2014). The goal of the
experiential design dimension is to create environments that serve a functional purpose
while also evoking particular feelings in building inhabitants, thereby improving their
quality of life.

Sustainable design is an integral part of the modern architectural paradigm and a crucial
part of the three-dimensional building project wheel. This dimension is devoted to
implementing eco-friendly procedures and technology that lessen the structure's negative
ecological effects. Architect and writer Brenda Vale highlights how architecture can have
a positive impact on the environment and highlights the celebratory character of
sustainable design (Vale, 2012). The cornerstones of this dimension include energy
efficiency, the use of environmentally friendly materials, and an awareness of the
long-term effects on the environment.

Spatial, visual, experiential, and sustainable design elements work in harmony to

produce architectural wonders that are more than just buildings; they are essential
elements of the human experience and environmental stewards.
Development Dimension

On the 3-D wheel of a building project, the Development Dimension captures the
dynamic and changing elements related to the implementation and expansion of
architectural endeavors. It includes the stages of design, planning, and building, all of
which are essential to realizing architectural ambitions.

Ideas are conceived and architectural concepts are formulated at the start of the voyage.
To define the project's overall vision, this first step entails ideation, creative inquiry, and
brainstorming. The significance of this initial phase is emphasized by architectural
theorist Christopher Alexander, who states that "each building should arise from the
circumstances and characteristics of its individual setting, not from a general rule"
(Alexander, 1964). In this case, the conception process is greatly influenced by the
special qualities of the site and the anticipated use of the building.

The development of the conceptual framework gives way to the emphasis on strategic
planning. This crucial stage entails turning concepts into workable plans while taking
deadlines, finances, and legal requirements into account. According to architect Peter F.
Drucker, "quality in a project is not what you put into it, it is what the client or customer
gets out of it" (Drucker, 1999), architectural development necessitates a careful approach
to project management. The project will be in line with the functional objectives and
expectations of the client thanks to strategic planning.

The building and implementation stages are when architectural visions come to life.
Architects, engineers, builders, and other stakeholders must work seamlessly together to
translate plans into real structures during this stage. The words "a building has integrity
just like a man. And just as seldom" are poignantly emphasized by architect Renzo Piano
(Piano, 1997). Building is more than just putting up structures; it's also about giving them
a sense of morality and direction.

Beyond the completion of construction, the Development Dimension recognizes that

buildings are dynamic, ever-evolving structures. Architectural plans ought to be flexible
enough to accommodate evolving circumstances and demands. According to
architectural historian Spiro Kostof, "a building adapts to modes of use, but its major
evolution comes from the play of cultural forces upon its forms" (Kostof, 1991), which
sheds light on the dynamic nature of buildings. Structures continue to evolve in response
to societal demands and cultural changes.
Delivery Dimension

On the 3-D wheel of a building project, the Delivery Dimension is a complex procedure
that includes crucial steps to guarantee the smooth implementation and sustainability of
architectural undertakings. It goes beyond the actual construction.

The first aspect of this dimension is the building phase's completion. This signifies the
completion of the actual construction process and highlights the need of paying close
attention to every little detail. The observation made by Renzo Piano that "a building has
integrity just like a man. And just as seldom" emphasizes the need of quality control
procedures to guarantee that the completed structure satisfies architectural requirements
and represents intended integrity and usefulness.

After building is finished, the project moves into user training and client handover. This
all-inclusive procedure includes the ownership transfer, required user training, and
paperwork. Peter F. Drucker's emphasis on quality as what the client or customer gets
out of the project emphasizes the significance of effective communication and training to
maximize the functionality of the building, acknowledging that architectural projects are
functional spaces designed to meet specific needs.

The post-occupancy evaluation, which gauges how effectively the structure functions in
actual circumstances and satisfies tenant needs, is essential to the Delivery Dimension.
The evaluation process benefits from Christopher Alexander's viewpoint, which supports
a continual improvement mindset and offers insightful information for future projects.
Each building should emerge from its unique surroundings.

Sustaining a building's long-term viability requires efficient facility management and

upkeep. This covers regular upkeep, repairs, and inspections. At this point, sustainable
design principles—highlighted by Brenda Vale—become essential, supporting the
overarching objective of reducing the structure's ecological footprint over its lifetime.

To sum up, the Delivery Dimension plans a whole process, from building completion to
client handover, post-occupancy assessment, and continuous facilities management.
Through this method, the built environment is guaranteed to fulfill needs now and
develop in a sustainable manner in the future.
III. The Architect’s Role in Society

a. The Building Enterprise

A holistic dedication that goes beyond simple design aesthetics characterizes the
architect's complex function within the building sector. Irwin (2014) highlights how
important it is for architects to create environments that support people's wants
and goals as individuals and as a community. By practicing community-centered
design, architects make sure that the built environment has a good influence on
the society it serves, accept diversity, and recognize the cultural context.

A dedication to ethical and ecological building practices is reflected in the

architect's role in environmental stewardship and sustainable design (Papanek,
1995). In line with the overarching objective of developing a resilient and
sustainable built environment, architects help to create buildings that have the
least negative influence on the environment.

According to Harmon (2009), the architect's role places a strong emphasis on

ethical responsibility. It is the responsibility of architects to ensure that the people
who live in the places they create are safe, healthy, and respected. This ethical
duty directs architects in handling difficult situations, maintaining their moral
character, and guaranteeing the greatest levels of professionalism across the
construction industry.

According to Brawne (2003), an architect's work is inherently collaborative and

requires good coordination and communication with a range of stakeholders,
including clients, engineers, contractors, and local government agencies. The
architect's role does not end with project delivery; they supervise the conversion
of design ideas into concrete, useful structures, guaranteeing that the final
product is in line with the original idea and meets user requirements.

According to Cuff (1991), an architect's duty is inextricably linked to their ability to

contribute to culture and aesthetics. Architects can contribute to a feeling of place
and identity by designing their buildings with cultural sensitivity, which allows
them to reflect and honor the identities of the communities they serve.

To sum up, the architect's job in the construction industry is a full-time job that
goes beyond just creating beautiful designs. Collaboration, a commitment to
moral values, sustainability, and a deep comprehension of the social and cultural
context of buildings are all necessary.

b. Public Safety and Interest

Ethical Responsibility and Professional Integrity

The social role of the architect is closely linked to ethical obligations and a
dedication to the interests and safety of the general public. Architects have a vital
role to play in making sure that the communities and the residents' safety,
well-being, and dignity are given first priority in the spaces they build. The
architect's professional integrity is based on this ethical obligation, which also
significantly influences the way their work is seen by society.

A key attribute of the architect's work, according to Harmon (2009), is ethical

responsibility. People's safety and well-being are entrusted to architects when
they build environments. Public safety and interests are the focus of a larger
ethical obligation that goes beyond specific enterprises. Over the course of the
building process, architects must manage difficult problems, make judgments that
put safety first, and maintain the highest standards of professionalism.

In architectural practice, public safety is of utmost importance. Architects are

required to follow building codes, laws, and standards that are put in place to
protect the community's welfare. Harmon (2009) pointed out that in order to make
sure their designs adhere to the required requirements, architects must strike a
difficult balance between their creative vision and adherence to safety laws.

Architects have an ethical responsibility that is strongly related to the idea of

professional integrity. It is imperative for architects to uphold integrity, openness,
and responsibility in their work-related interactions. Maintaining professional
integrity requires a dedication to producing designs that put the public's safety
and interests ahead of purely aesthetic and functional requirements.

Essentially, a deep ethical duty shapes the architect's place in society with
reference to public safety and interests. This duty encompasses all phases of the
architectural process, from planning to building and beyond. Architects contribute
to the design of built environments that improve the quality of life for individuals
and communities by placing a high priority on public safety and interests.

Compliance to Building Code

Compliance with building codes and regulations is a direct manifestation of this

ethical responsibility, as architects must navigate the regulatory landscape to
create designs that align with established safety standards.Building codes and
regulations are comprehensive sets of guidelines that dictate the minimum
standards for construction and occupancy of buildings. Architects are obligated to
be well-versed in these codes and regulations, which vary by jurisdiction, and to
integrate them into their designs to ensure that the built environment is safe for
inhabitants.

The compliance process involves careful consideration of factors such as

structural integrity, fire safety, accessibility, and other critical elements that impact
the safety and functionality of a structure. As architects navigate the creative
process, they must simultaneously ensure that their designs adhere to the
specific requirements outlined in building codes.

Architects collaborate with various stakeholders, including engineers, contractors,

and local authorities, to ensure that the designed structures comply with
applicable codes and regulations. This collaborative effort is crucial in achieving a
harmonious balance between design innovation and the imperative of public
safety.
By prioritizing compliance with building codes and regulations, architects
contribute to the broader goal of creating built environments that are resilient,
safe, and conducive to the well-being of individuals and communities. This
commitment reflects not only the ethical responsibility of architects but also their
dedication to upholding professional standards that prioritize the public interest.

Universal Design and Accessibility

Architects play a pivotal role in shaping the built environment to ensure that it is
inclusive, accommodating the diverse needs of individuals, and fostering
accessibility for everyone. According to Harmon (2009), ethical responsibility is a
cornerstone of the architect's role, emphasizing the importance of designing
spaces that prioritize the safety, well-being, and dignity of all individuals.
Universal design and accessibility are integral components of this ethical
responsibility, aiming to create environments that are usable by people of all
abilities and ages.

Universal design involves the creation of environments, products, and systems

that are inherently accessible to people with diverse abilities, without the need for
adaptation or specialized design. Architects, as stewards of the built environment,
are essential contributors to the implementation of universal design principles.

Accessibility, in the context of architectural design, encompasses the removal of

barriers that might hinder the full participation of individuals with disabilities. This
includes considerations for physical disabilities, sensory impairments, and
cognitive challenges. Architects must design spaces that facilitate ease of
movement, provide equitable access to amenities, and ensure that everyone can
navigate and utilize the built environment with dignity and independence.

Collaboration with various stakeholders, including accessibility experts, advocacy

groups, and individuals with diverse needs, is essential for architects to gain
insights into the practical aspects of universal design. This collaborative approach
ensures that architectural solutions are informed by a comprehensive
understanding of accessibility requirements.

Incorporating universal design and accessibility features not only aligns with
ethical principles but also contributes to the creation of a more inclusive and
equitable society. The built environment, when designed with universal access in
mind, becomes a tool for social integration and empowerment.

Design Resilience and Emergency Preparedness

Architects play a crucial role in creating built environments that can withstand and
respond effectively to various hazards, ensuring the safety and well-being of the
public.

According to Harmon (2009), the ethical responsibility of architects includes a

commitment to the safety and dignity of the occupants of the spaces they design.
Design resilience and emergency preparedness are integral components of this
ethical obligation, acknowledging the need to anticipate and mitigate potential
risks.

Design resilience involves creating structures that can adapt to and recover from
disturbances, whether natural disasters, climate-related events, or other
emergencies. Architects contribute to resilient design by incorporating features
that enhance structural integrity, protect against environmental stressors, and
allow for the continuity of essential functions during and after emergencies.

Emergency preparedness in architectural design entails anticipating and planning

for potential hazards. This includes considerations for safe evacuation routes,
secure shelter areas, and the integration of emergency systems such as fire
suppression and communication systems. Architects collaborate with engineers
and other experts to ensure that the design not only meets aesthetic and
functional requirements but also prioritizes safety in emergency situations.

The collaborative effort extends to engagement with local authorities, emergency

responders, and community stakeholders to align architectural designs with
emergency response plans. By actively participating in emergency preparedness
discussions, architects contribute to creating built environments that enhance
community resilience and reduce vulnerability to disasters.

Incorporating resilient design and emergency preparedness features not only

safeguards public safety but also contributes to the overall well-being of
communities. The built environment, when designed with resilience and
preparedness in mind, becomes a critical asset in minimizing the impact of
emergencies and supporting effective response and recovery efforts.
References:

● Foster, N. (2007). The Foster Studio. Thames & Hudson.

● Yeang, K. (2012). Ecodesign: A Manual for Ecological Design. John Wiley & Sons.
● Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People. Island Press.
● Hadid, Z. (2003). Zaha Hadid: Complete Works 1979–2009. Thames & Hudson.
● Fletcher, B. (1991). "A History of Architecture on the Comparative Method."
● Kostof, S. (1995). The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession. University
of California Press.
● Corbusier, L. (1987). Towards a New Architecture. Dover Publications.
● Bhabha, H. K. (1996). Culture's In-Between. In Questions of Cultural Identity (Eds. S.
Hall & P. du Gay). Sage Publications.
● Willis, D. (2017). The Architect's Handbook of Construction Detailing. John Wiley &
Sons.
● Foster, N. (2010). Norman Foster: A Life in Architecture. Rizzoli.
● Cruz, T. (2019). Architecture and Urbanism in the Borderlands: A Manifesto for S
Change. University of California Press.
● Kubey, K. (2018). Housing as Intervention: Architecture towards Social Equity.
Routledge.
● Griffin, T. L. (2019). The Just City. Island Press.
● Safdie, M. (2019). Safdie. Rizzoli.
● José, R. T. (1998). "Searching for the Indio roots of the Filipino colonial house." In:
Manansala, P. G., & Tiglao, R. (Eds.), Colonial Manila: The Context of
Hispanic Urbanism and Process of Morphogenesis. UST Publishing House.
● Lico, G. (2013). Arkitekturang Filipino: A History of Architecture and Urbanism in the
Philippines. The University of the Philippines Press.
● Philippine Institute of Architects (PIA). (n.d.). About PIA. Retrieved from
https://www.pia.gov.ph/about-us/about-pia
● National Building Code of the Philippines. Department of Public Works and
Highways. https://www.dpwh.gov.ph/dpwh/quality_plan/nbc
● Local Government Code of the Philippines. Republic Act No. 7160.
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1991/10/10/republic-act-no-7160/
● Cuff, D. (1991). "Architecture: The Story of Practice."
● Harmon, R. (2009). "Ethics for Architects: 50 Dilemmas of Professional Practice."
● Papanek, V. (1995). "The Green Imperative: Ecology and Ethics in Design and
Architecture."
● Brawne, M. (2003). "Architectural Thought: The Design Process and the Expectant
Eye."
● Irwin, J. (2014). "Placemaking and Urban Development: New Challenges for
Contemporary Planning and Design."
● Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture: Form, Space, and Order. John Wiley & Sons.
● Evans, R. (1997). The Projective Cast: Architecture and Its Three Geometries. The
MIT Press.
● Pallasmaa, J. (2014). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. John Wiley
& Sons.
● Vale, B. (2012). Architecture on the Carpet: The Curious Tale of Construction Toys
and the Genesis of Modern Buildings. Thames & Hudson.
● Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press.
● Drucker, P. F. (1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. HarperBusiness.
● Kostof, S. (1991). The Architect: Chapters in the History of the Profession. Oxford
University Press.
● Piano, R. (1997). Renzo Piano Building Workshop: Complete Works, Volume One.
Phaidon Press.
● Irwin, J. (2014). "Placemaking and Urban Development: New Challenges for
Contemporary Planning and Design."
● Papanek, V. (1995). "The Green Imperative: Ecology and Ethics in Design and
Architecture."
● Harmon, R. (2009). "Ethics for Architects: 50 Dilemmas of Professional Practice."
● Brawne, M. (2003). "Architectural Thought: The Design Process and the Expectant
Eye."
● Cuff, D. (1991). "Architecture: The Story of Practice."
● Harmon, J. M. (2009). The Practice of Architecture: Contemplative, Transformative,
and Ethical. Routledge.