Unit IG2: Risk assessment

Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).

Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment.Your Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant
resources section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.

Part 1: Background

You should aim to complete this section in 150 - 200 words.

Topic Comments
Name of organisation* NORA builders
Site location* Kochi
Number of workers 322
Nora builders is an ISO 9001:2008 certified partnership firm .who have construction sites whole
over INDIA. Established from 2000 It is owned by Wealthy Family in India KHAITANgroup. Nora is
expert in infrastructures constructions such as Amusement parks, stadiums. Multi storey
buildings,roads, shopping complex etc.

I did my project In their upcoming shopping complex project in Kochi which had an estimated size
of 9000square feet .works carried out in the site at my time of visit were mainly are Welding ,
General description of the organisation
Electric works, drilling manual handling ,carpentry, grinding,flooring,painting, painting, roofing etc.
With diesel generators ,crane, along with heavy load carrying vehicles

Organisation was working under 2 shift patterns morning shift from (8am-4pm) evening shift from
(4 pm to 12 pm) .site operated for 6 days a week with weekend holidays along with 3 paid
holidays every month for every employee.

Description of the area to be included in the

The whole construction site (Include store room, ware house).
risk assessment
Any other relevant information Safety officer was responsible for healthy and safety at construction site

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 1 of 17

 * If you’re worried about confidentiality, you can invent a false name and location for your organisation but, all other information provided must be
factual.

You should aim to complete this section in 100 - 200 words.

Note: this section can be completed after you have competed your risk assessment.
Outline how the risk assessment was carried
out this should include:
 sources of information consulted;
 who you spoke to; and
 how you identified:
- the hazards;
- what is already being done; and
Any additional controls/actions that
may be required.
To conduct the risk assessment I had referred few websites such as
http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/coninder.htm and www.labour.gov.hk which was based on health
and welfare at construction sites
After studying these websites I went on to conduct a detailed inspection of the worksite and also
inquired with workers whether they are facing any difficulty during work and through this enquiry I
made an assumption about how well the workers were aware of company health and safety
policies. After that a meeting was conducted with safety officer to identify whether there were any
repetitive trends accidents occurring in the industry over the past few years. They showed me
there accident bookend also some control measures that are already in place
After going through case study of similar construction sites and few websites such as
http://www.ilo.org/safework/info international labour organisation codes {ILO} and
http://www.osho.gov . which helped me suggesting few additional control measures

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 2 of 17

 Part 2: Risk Assessment

Organisation name: NORA Builders

Date of assessment: 08-08-2021
Scope of risk assessment: The whole construction site

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Load Crane operators , Provided PPE such as helmets Appoint a crane operator who has well 1 week Site in charge
handling ,Workers supervisor and and boots experience in operating crane
equipment visitors
Both operator and banks man Conduct awareness classes regarding 2 week Safety officer
Collapse of Load falling from the are instructed to use the PPE safe operating system of crane
crane due to crane or the boom of
overloading crane striking people or Banks man has been provided Barricade should employed to restrict 1 week Site in charge
and improper structures can result in for helping crane operator people movements around
stability major injuries such as
broken bones, dislocation Regular maintenance of crane Maximum load limit should be set for 2 days Site in charge
of body parts or even is done to ensure smooth crane
death of person in few running
cases Ensure the load is properly tied and 1 day Safety officer
carried

Appoint competent person for 2 days

supervision Site in charge

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 3 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Lone working The security officer will be Officer appointed is well High Wall should be built around the 2 months Site in charge
in harm’s way in case of experienced compound
Security officer violence at night
taking night CCTV cameras with night Regular training must be given to 1 weeks Safety officer
shifts and Lot of unwanted violence, vision are installed officer regarding how to deal with
working alone theft and crime at the thefts
area thus security might
beaten up or injured in an Officer have been equipped Purchase baton, torch pepper, spray 4 days Finance
accident or even get killed with PPE like shields for for self-protection manager
defence
An emergency first aid room should 1 week Safety officer
be built for emergency situations

Panic alarm facility must be installed 1 week Site in charge

More guards should be hired to

increase security strength 1 week Site in charge
Vibration Worker working on the PPE such as gloves were given System should be developed to 15 days Safety officer
device ,helpers calculate daily exposure limit
Exposure to
vibrating tools Exposure to continues Conducted awareness classes
such as Vibration can cause regarding harmful effects of Job rotation should be carried out to 5 days Site in charge
Hammers, damage to the soft tissue vibration and its effects reduce the
Drills ,angle of the spine ,muscle
grinders weakening, joint damage Tools are properly lubricated Health check-up of exposed worker at 1 week Safety officer
HAVS, nerve damage, and maintained management care
and also paralysis of body
Health drinks are given in the An interval between continues work
interval time to boost worker should be introduced to release stress 1 week Site in charge
health
work should be done using PTW 2 weeks Safety officer

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 4 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
system

work must be conducted in isolation 2 days Site in charge

Noise Workers working on the Short interval are given to Tools should be replaced with latest 1 month Finance
equipment or anyone reduce stress caused by noise model less sound producing tools manager
Excessive coming close to the sound
sounds Health check-up of exposed worker at 6 months Safety officer
produced at An exposure of 90 dB barricades are placed to avoid management cost
construction over 8 hrs. is considered unwanted people movements
site as upper exposure Job rotation should be brought to 1 week Site in charge
category .continuous machine maintenance and control the exposure
exposure at this limit can service is done in time
cause pain in the nose A noise assessment test should be 2 days Safety officer
induced hearing loss , Training sections are conducted regularly to check noise
tinnitus and inability to conducted regarding noise and level at office
hear its harmful effects
PPE like ear puffs and earplugs 3 days Safety officer
should be provided

Conduct noise producing activities in 3 days Site

less crowded area supervisor

Warning sign boards should be placed

around to warn the people about noise 2 days Safety officer
conditions
Manual Workers who are lifting Training given regarding good Purchase fork lifting truck 2 months Finance
handling the load and the helpers handling technique and bad manager
handling technique
Lifting the Continuous load carriage Job rotation system should introduced 2 weeks Site in charge

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 5 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
construction can cause long-term and Works are modified by authority
materials to physical injuries such as based on physical capabilities Intervals should be given between 2 weeks Site in charge
each floors back injury ,tendon and of individuals regular work
ligament injuries ,hernias
back pain, shoulder Handles are attached to loads Medical check-up of load carrying 6 month Safety officer
injuries, sprains etc. for easy lifting workers should be done at
management expense
Unwanted blocks are cleared
From the path before the work Heavy loads must been distributed in 2 days Site in charge
is started groups to reduce loads

Providing pain killers and deep PPE like gloves and boots should be 1 day Site in charge
heat oilmen’s as first aid given to workers

Maximum load has been set at Purchase mechanical aids such as 1 week Site in charge
50 kgs trolley

Health Workers in the yard, 10 minutes Intervals are A temporary roof should be built above 1 week Site in charge
welfare and Engineers ,visitors provided between 2hrs work to the open yard
Work relax
environment Yard conditions becomes Work time must be changed to avoid 3 days Site in charge
unstable at noon extreme heat
Workers conditions leading to rise Fans are provided to reduce
working in the in temperature which can temperature Compulsory paid holidays for worker 1 day Site in charge
open yard who cause cardiovascular and working in heat conditions to reduce
are exposed to respiratory disorders Cotton clothes are provided to heat conditions
direct sunlight along with heatstroke’s reduce heat
even in the sunburns
peak Works are conducted in shift
temperature patterns Health surveillances must be carried 6 month Safety officer
out

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 6 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)

Supervision must be carried out 3 days Site engineer

regularly to check control measures
are carried out properly

Health drinks must be given during 1 day Site in charge

Work at Workers and supervisors
height any one standing in that
area
Scaffold failure
due to Material falling from
overloading height or even people
and outdated falling from height can fall
equipment upon the workers and
cause injuries such as
cuts, crushing of body
parts broken bones and
even death in some cases
work time
The workers are wearing hard Purchase new set of scaffold 2 weeks Finance
hats for protection manager
Training classes are given Use personal protective equipment fall 2 days Site manager
regarding how to conduct work restrain systems
at height safely
Barriers and warning boards Guard rails must be installed 3 days Safety officer
have been provided near the increasing security
scaffold
Safety nets should be installed around 4 days Site in charge
Work at height should be carried out 2 days Safety officer
under proper supervision

PTW system should be developed to 2 weeks Safety officer

reduce overloading on scaffold

Confined Worker and co-worker Training sections are given Well controlled risk N/A N/A
space who are entering the harmful effects of manhole
manhole will be effected problems
Worker
entering the
manhole Worker entering the man Full body kits are given at site

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 7 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
where less hole can be diagnosed itself before entering the holes
oxygen supply with diarrhoea, fever,
is available typhoid, inability to Safety boots are provided with
and presence breathe due to lack of helmets and oxygen cylinders
of unwanted oxygen which can cause
gases even death Atmosphere test is conducted
before the man is allowed to
enter the hole

Communication facility is
established

Interval has been scheduled

every 30 minutes

Medical check-up of worker is

conducted every 6 months
Electricity Workers Engineers First aid facilities are arranged Ensure double insulation 3 weeks Site in charge
electricians anyone in case of shocks
Shocks from oversteppingor coming in
electrical contact with live wires will PPE like rubber gloves and Follow lockout tag when conducting 1 week Safety officer
equipment and get shock rubber boots have been given maintenance on electrical wires
exposed live
electric wire Over stepping on Danger warning boards have Fire extinguishers should be installed 1 week Safety officer
joints Electrical wire can result been placed at every corners
in shocks burns that can
result in damage to body Periodic maintenance of electrical 2 days Safety officer
parts or even deaths equipment
shock burns
Provide power supply with (electric 2 days Safety officer

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 8 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
leakage circuit breaker) ELCB

Install (residual current device) RCD to 1 week Safety officer

protect

Appoint a doctor treat the wounded at 2 weeks Site in charge

Fire All the worker and
supervisor
Storage of
flammables Keeping flammables and
close to welding workshop can
welding cause un controllable
workshop explosion which causes
raising the fire smoke. Inhalation of
concern smoke can cause
problems such as asthma
vomiting along with fire
can cause burns and
death in some cases
along with total structural
collapse
site
Isolate and build a separate storing 1 week Safety officer
space for safely storing the
flammables
Warning signs are placed Install automatic water sprinklers to 2 weeks Site in charge
around deal with emergency fire
Fire extinguisher are placed Install smoke dictators to detect fire 2 weeks Site in charge
near the storeroom for
emergency fire Conduct fire drills to cop up with fire in 2 days Site in charge
case of emergency fire situations
Awareness classes have been
given regarding fire situation Install warning alarms to warn 2 weeks Safety officer
and how to handle it everyone regarding the fire breakout
Provide leather gloves and face shield 1 week Site officer
for workers working nearby

Safe Drivers ,workers visitors High visible jackets for workers Build a separate road for trucks and 7 days Site Engineer
movement of who ever present at that workers
people and moment during collisions Flag man has been provided
vehicle on will be injured Appoint security official traffic 3 days Safety officer
site Trucks are regularly serviced to responsible
Due to usage of same avoid sudden break downs

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 9 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Collision of roads for trucks and
Heavy load passengers increased the Good light facility are provided A proper traffic layout plan should be 4 days Site in charge
carrying chances of Accidents that at site developed
Vehicles and can lead to cut scratches.
workers due Dislocation of bones or Speed limit of maximum 20 is Pedestrian free zones should be built 1 week Safety officer
tousing same even death in some cases set
road for travel
CCTV camera should be installed to 1 week Site in charge
regulate vehicle movements

Truck drivers hired should be well 4 days Site in charge

Hazardous Workers, supervisors and
substance site engineers anyone
visiting the location
Dust from
tools such as Inhalation of dust
grinding, substance can result in
drilling etc. respiratory problems, lung
problems asthma and
continuous exposure can
cause cancer, rhinitis etc.
experienced
Workers used to clean the Build an temporary enclosed area 1 month Site in charge
workplace regularly around grinding activities with
sufficient ventilation system
N95 masks are given
Health check-up of exposed worker at 6 month Safety officer
management cost
Improved housekeeping facility with 3 weeks Site in charge
suitable vacuum cleaners daily
Awareness classes are given to 2 weeks Safety officer
workers regarding personal hygiene

Provide PPE such a goggles and 4 weeks Safety officer

helmets

Job rotation must be carried out 2 weeks Site in charge

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 10 of 17

Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already doing? What further controls/actions are Timescalesfor
category and and how? required? further actions Responsible
hazard to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
Mental ill Workers, supervisors, Week end compulsory holidays A counsellor at worksite to talk and 3 weeks Site in charge
health safety officers who are solve problems
subjected to pressure Interval between work time to
work pressure relax
and deadline Workers who are working increase in pay every 20 months 2 weeks Site in charge
day jobs from overtime and overload Water and juice facility at
senior level can have severe mental management cost to every Holiday packages at management 2 weeks Finance
officer issues that can affect the worker cost every year manager
society and workplace
causing problems Family gathering and party on special 3 weeks Finance
occasions at work site manager

Appoint more man to complete hard 4 weeks Site in charge

jobs

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 11 of 17

Part 3: Prioritise 3 actions with justification for the selection
Suggested word counts
Moral, general legal and financial arguments for all actions: 300 to 350 words
For each action:
Specific legal arguments: 100 to 150 words
Likelihood AND severity: 75 to 150 words
How effective the action is likely to be in controlling the risk: 100 to 150 words

Moral, general legal and financial arguments for all actions

Moral, general legal and financial
arguments
NORA have been well respected and reputed organisation over the nation for the importance and
priority they show in developing and maintaining a good health and safety culture at their
workplaces. Everyone individuals stepping on the site has family and a home to return to safely
without any injury or harm from the workplace thus NORA always believed that it was their
responsibility towards Workersprovide and ensure a safe working condition is available. Pain and
sufferings are only for workers and their family in case of any accident occurring. Thus organisation
always conducts every necessary training section and also provide best safety environment
necessary in order to keep the workers safe from every harm and hazards.
Looking into the financial aspects it is also beneficial for an organisation to provide adequate safety
at worksites having accidents or incidents can really disrupt the harmony of good working and lead
to a negative culture.

Accident at worksite will be leading to valuable loss in production time along with property damage
and other expenditures. There are expenses such as first aid treatment facility to injured employee,
sick pay to the injured employee such expenses can’t be even included in the insurance section as
they are indirect costs which management are responsible to pay. Along with the good will and
brand name, loss or reputed image build by the company over the past few years, loss of staff
Morale slowing down the work rate, along with training and recruiting a new staff in place of injured
worker are all loss of finance. Considering all these financial expenditures it is better for
management to provide maximum standards for health and safety conditions at work site
Increase in accidents at worksites all over the world has led to introduction of legalities for the

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 12 of 17

 welfare and safe working of worker community at construction sites. International labour
organisation (ILO) has laid down Laws, convention and recommendation for the safe working of
organisation. NORA strictly follows every rules and regulations set from the ILO along with national
law and enforcement orders. Management believes that violation of these guidelines and
recommendations may result in certain legal enforcement such as stopping in particular activity until
the improvement is made. along with certain civil claims from the injured worker who have been
Harmed by working in company or by working methods of the site these claims can be evenmade
years after leaving the company that management are responsible to pay.

Justification for action 1

Action
Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
Build a temporary enclosed area for conducting grinding and sanding operations with adequate
ventilation facilities (hazard category –Hazardous substance)
The ILO Convention C155 and Recommendation (R164) state that employer must make sure that
the working process is reasonably safe. The ILO code of practice (COP) safety in the use of
chemicals at work gives specific advice on the appropriate measures that employers must make to
protect workers against the risk identified by an assessment of risk. The ILO code of practice
recording and notification of occupational accidents and disease requires employer to report cases
of occupational asthma to our nation’s health and safety regulator. According to R156 working
environment Article 2 it is the duty of the employer to arrange a hazardous free environment to work
safe
As the workers were working without proper PPE The likelihood that workers or anyone getting sick
from inhaling the dust particles coming from grinding activities seems Very High because workers
are working close to the dust particles and also lack of protection and control measures for a long
duration of time without much protection and care workers are exposed which increases the likely
hood and danger of getting exposed to hazard substance
considering severity I set 4 categories
*minimal-no injury or no damage
*Minor-injury that need first aid attention with less considerable or negligible damages to plants
*major-injury that needs hospital treatment /heavy damages to plant and equipment’s

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 13 of 17


How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 Whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 2
Action
Specific legal arguments
Learner number: 00507562
*Catastrophic-accident causing death /irreparable damages to plant equipment buildings
Severity of this hazard is set at major category as it is very probable that workers will be subjected
to disease such as respiratory problems, irritations, skin allergies lung problems, asthma, which
require hospital treatment for workers working close to the source. for distant people it will be
minimal level
The dust enclosure will have a sudden and major impact on controlling the amount of dust in
general work places as the enclosure will stop the dust from escaping the area through every
direction and control the spread of hazardous substance and provide a safe environment for
working
I have given a time scale of 30 days of time scale to complete the task as these operation doesn’t
require much finance and materials that are required to complete the task are readily available at
the scenario itself making it easy approval from management side also completing the task with
given period of time.
Installing the dust enclosure will not fully control the risk but will significantly reduce the level. If it is
used with conjunction with other suggested recommendation and control measures we can
eliminate the risk up to an extent
Separating the welding area and flammable storage space ( hazard category Fire)
C167 safety and health in construction convention 1988 (no 167) article 27 law states that
explosives shall not be stored, transported, handled or used except under prescribed conditions
from national laws, and by competent person who shall take steps to workers and other persons
are no exposed to risk of injury
Article 29 of the same law states that employer should take all necessary precautions to avoid the
Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 14 of 17

Consideration of likelihood AND severity
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 Whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Justification for action 3
Action
Learner number: 00507562
risk of fire, bring about quick and safe evacuation of persons. Sufficient and suitable storage shall
be provided for safe storage of flammable liquids, solids and gasses
R164 occupational safety and health recommendation, 1981 (No. 164) prevention of fires
explosions and measures to be taken in case of accidental fire
In the site working of welding workshop and storage facility of flammable materials like fuels and
oils were very close which in any accidental situation may cause explosions in worksite while
working together. There is no separate room for storingmaterials also nothing separating both flame
and flammables which puts likelihood of explosions occurring in a HIGH situation
Severity table is same as rated in the justification 1. Severity is ranging from major to catastrophic
region as the fire explosion may be uncontrollable that can cause lot of smoke and fire waves that
can lead to burns to skin and body parts ,casualties, deaths and destruction of structure and plants
causing a major disaster at plant that are beyond repair
Flammable materials are kept in an open condition close to a welding workshop which by any
chance of spark or welding debris will lead to an explosion causing damages to structure and
human life as flammable materials unavoidable and needed at worksite Thus we need to separate
the welding workshop and build a temporary isolated space for storing the materials in worksite
thus be separating bothwe can protect it from such unwanted fire and explosions that can cause
complete destruction by applying these control measures we can control the hazard to an maximum
extent
I have given a time scale of 2 days of time with emergency alert to complete the task as it may take
just any bad moment or accident to cause total destruction of work site
Separating ignition source and flammables we can control the risk to an extent as long is storage
room is well stored and preserved from fire
Buying forklift truck to reduce manual loading (hazard category “Manual handling”)
Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 15 of 17
Specific legal arguments
Consideration of likelihood AND severity
How effective the action is likely to be in
controlling the risk. This should include:
 the intended impact of the action;
 justification for the timescale that you
indicated in your risk assessment;
and
 Whether you think the action will fully
control the risk.
Part 4: Review, communicate and check
Learner number: 00507562
ILO convention C127 maximum weight convention 1967 (no. 127) and recommendation (no 128)
states that for fixing a weight limit in the manual handling ,giving sufficient rest time and also avoid
workers who are below 18. Article 6 of the 127 explains that in order to limit or to facilitate the
manual carrying of loads necessary technical devices shall be used as much as possible.
Article 5 of C127 states that each worker shall take appropriate steps to ensure that any worker
assigned to carry manual load carrying of loads other than light loads requires adequate training to
safeguarding health and prevent accidents
Likely hood of worker getting injured from manual loading seems very likely as the workers are
carrying the load behind their back for a long distance with improper lifting technique and overload
without proper support and assistance that makes the task more difficult and increases the likely of
worker getting injured to very HIGH category
Severity is same as in listed above in justifications 1. Severity is rated as Major category for
workers who are carrying the load daily as consequence of unsafe manual handling may lead to
back injury , muscle pain, hernias, WRULD it will be minor injuries such as sprain and strains that
can be cured from first aid itself for workers who carry loads for just a single day or particular
occasions only
Purchasing a forklift truck to transport loads will minimise the manual handling efforts on the
workers and also reduce the risk of getting injured from it. Fork lift can transport more load in the
short amount of time while comparing to manual loading and also reduce the efforts put in while
comparing it to other methods
Have allocated 60 days of time to complete the task as purchase manager needs to study and
investigate the report and he will be presenting it to the managing director. and after his approval
only the finance will passed to complete the task successfully
By using fork lifting truck and other load handling equipment’s manual handling can be avoided thus
we can control the risk up to an maximum extent
Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 16 of 17
Suggested word counts for each section:
 Planned review date or period and reasoning for this: 50 - 100words
 How the risk assessment findings will be communicated and who needs to know the information: 100 - 150 words
 Follow up on the risk assessment: 100 - 150 words.

Planned review date/period
withreasoning
How the risk assessment findings will be
communicated AND who you need to tell
How you will follow up on the risk
assessment to check that the actions
have been carried out
As per company policy and regulations the next review of risk assessment should be conducted
after 6 months of time so thenext assessment will be on 08-02-2022 and review of risk assessment
will be reviewed in between or before the date in case of accidents or near miss that happened or
any recommendation from workers
After the risk assessment is completed I will be conducting a meeting with the higher officials such
as site manager, finance manager, site in charge and will be giving them a copy of my findings and
also will be communicating regarding the current hazard conditions at site. And few copies will be
posted in the notice boards of each section. I will meet the workers and talk with them regarding the
current working scenario and the control measures. I will ask the workers to conduct trainings to
deal with emergency situations such as conducting a fire drill. I will be uploading my findings in
company’s website and other communication methods were workers can easily gain access to
these information anytime
For checking the progress I will set a reminder before 5 days at my phone of the each
recommended action. To ensure the work is in progress I will be calling the workers personally on
their mobile number. If I feel the actions are not going to be completed on time I will asking
questions to the officials regarding the delay and its justifications and will be trying to provide
awareness of the situation that is present. and also if there is more delay even after awareness I
will send mails to higher management authorities like managing director ,finance manager, plant
head regarding the situation .if needed I will be arranging personnel meeting with the individuals

Learner number: 00507562 Learner name: MOHAMED JUNIDE Page 17 of 17