Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Real-Time Object Detection Overview Advancements C
Real-Time Object Detection Overview Advancements C
Real-Time Object Detection Overview Advancements C
Abstract
Real-time object detection is a crucial aspect of computer vision with applications spanning autonomous
vehicles, surveillance, robotics, and augmented reality. This study examines real-time object detection
techniques, highlighting their significance in artificial intelligence. The primary goal is swift and accurate
object identification in images or video streams. Traditional methods like sliding windows and region-
based approaches had limitations in computational efficiency. Deep learning, particularly Convolutional
Neural Networks (CNNs), revolutionized object detection. Models like SSD, YOLO, and Faster R-CNN
excel in accuracy and speed. They employ anchor boxes, feature pyramid networks, and non-maximum
suppression to balance precision and processing speed. Hardware accelerators like GPUs, TPUs, and
FPGAs facilitate real-time inference.
Challenges in real-time object detection include occlusion, scale variations, and cluttered environments.
Researchers must navigate the trade-offs between accuracy and speed. Real-time object detection is
pivotal in computer vision, enabling intelligent systems across diverse applications. The continuous
evolution of deep learning algorithms and hardware capabilities pushes the boundaries of this field,
making it a dynamic research domain in artificial intelligence.
Keyword: Object detection, Video Detection, Real time Detection, Algorithm detection.
ويستخدم على نطاق واسع، يعد الكشف عن الكائنات في الزمن الحقيقي مهمة أساسية في ميدان الرؤية الحاسوبية:الملخص
تقدم هذه الدراسة الشاملة نظرة مفصلة على.في مجاالت مثل السيارات ذاتية القيادة ومراقبة األمان والروبوتات والواقع المعزز
يهدف الكشف في الزمن. مع التركيز على دورها الحاسم في مجال الذكاء االصطناعي،تقنيات الكشف في الزمن الحقيقي
بينما وضعت األساليب التقليدية مثل.الحقيقي إلى التعرف على الكائنات بسرعة ودقة في الصور أو مقاطع الفيديو
كانت تعاني من قيود في الكفاءة الحسابية، األسس لهذا الميدانregion-based approaches and slide window
حيث ظهرت الشبكات العصبية التحويلية، ظهور التعلم العميق قاد إلى تغيير جذري في كشف الكائنات.للتطبيقات الفعلية
تميزتFaster R-CNN وYOLO وSSD النماذج المعروفة مثل.( كعامل مهم في أنظمة الكشف الحديثةCNN)
تستفيد هذه النهج من ت قنيات مثل صناديق الربط وشبكات هرم السمات والقمع األقصى لتحقيق توازن بين.بدقتها وسرعتها
،كبير في الكشف في الزمن الحقيقي
دور ًا
ًاFPGAs وTPUs وGPUs تلعب تسريعات األجهزة مثل.الدقة وسرعة المعالجة
، يتناول هذا البحث التحديات التي تواجه كشف الكائنات في الزمن الحقيقي.حيث تمكن من تنفيذ نماذج التعلم العميق بسرعة
يظل كشف. باإلضافة إلى التوازن بين الدقة والسرعة الذي يجب معالجته،مثل التغطية وتباين الحجم والبيئات المزدحمة
تستمر. حيث يمكنه تمكين األنظمة الذكية في تطبيقات متنوعة،مهما في مجال الرؤية الحاسوبية
ً الكائنات في الزمن الحقيقي
مؤكدة على وضعه كمجال بحثي ديناميكي،تطورات خوارزميات التعلم العميق وقدرات األجهزة في دفع حدود هذا المجال
.ومتقدم في ميدان الذكاء االصطناعي
1. Introduction
The realm of real-time object detection has emerged as an indispensable facet of computer vision,
encompassing the rapid and precise identification of objects within images and video streams [1].
This capability finds extensive utility across diverse applications, including but not limited to
autonomous vehicles, robotics, surveillance, and augmented reality [2]. The ability to promptly
discern and accurately locate objects within visual data streams holds the potential to revolutionize
decision-making processes and enhance the efficiency of state-of-the-art technologies. Real-time
object detection has witnessed a transformative shift with the advent of deep learning, particularly
the emergence of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) [3]. These neural networks have
revolutionized computer vision tasks by autonomously extracting intricate feature representations
_________________________________________________
*
Email: Sharabi28@hotmail.com
©Amran University Publishing
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
from raw pixel data, enabling the discernment of complex patterns and features essential for robust
object recognition.
An array of deep learning-based object detection models have come to the fore, each distinguished
by its unique architecture and strengths [2][3][5]. Eminent examples include YOLO (You Only
Look Once), SSD (Single Shot Multibox Detector), and Faster R-CNN (Region-based
Convolutional Neural Networks). These models employ diverse strategies to strike a balance
between accuracy and speed, catering to the dynamic requisites of real-time applications. The
process of real-time object detection entails a series of stages, including data collection, annotation,
model training, and inference. Deep learning models are trained on extensive datasets containing
labeled instances of objects, enabling them to acquire the ability to accurately detect objects. During
inference, these models expeditiously analyze live video streams or sequences of images, generating
bounding boxes around identified objects along with corresponding class labels. The pursuit of real-
time capabilities necessitates the implementation of optimization techniques [5]. Strategies such as
model quantization, which reduces model size while preserving performance, combined with the
utilization of hardware acceleration through GPUs or TPUs (Tensor Processing Units), collectively
contribute to enhancing the processing speed and overall efficiency of real-time object detection
systems.
While remarkable progress has been achieved, the domain of real-time object detection remains a
vibrant area of research [2, 4]. Researchers persistently explore novel algorithms, architectures, and
enhancements in hardware to amplify model accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability, thereby
establishing more robust and practical real-time object detection systems capable of thriving in real-
world scenarios.
Real-time object detection is rooted in the fundamental task of identifying and localizing objects
within images or video streams. The objective is to categorize objects while delineating their
precise positions through bounding boxes within visual data. The trajectory of object detection has
witnessed substantial evolution, driven by the rise of deep learning techniques and the availability
of meticulously annotated datasets. Central to these advancements are Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNNs), which autonomously discern hierarchical features from data. Models such as
YOLO (You Only Look Once) and Faster R-CNN serve as exemplars of the remarkable accuracy
and real-time performance that have come to define object detection across diverse applications.
The motivation behind real-time object detection stems from the growing need for efficient and
accurate visual understanding systems in various real-world applications. Traditional object
detection methods, although effective, often fell short in handling the challenges of real-time
processing, which is crucial in dynamic environments where timely responses are essential. The
emergence of deep learning-based approaches, such as YOLO (You Only Look Once) and SSD
(Single Shot Multibox Detector), provided a solution to this problem, sparking a significant
advancement in real-time object detection capabilities [2]
2. Literature Overview
Object detection is a fundamental task in computer vision that involves identifying and localizing
objects of interest within images or video streams. The objective is to not only classify objects into
predefined categories but also draw bounding boxes around them, pinpointing their exact locations
in the visual data. Over the years, significant advancements have been made in object detection,
driven by the emergence of deep learning techniques and the availability of large annotated datasets.
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have played a pivotal role in revolutionizing object
detection by automatically learning hierarchical features from data. Several state-of-the-art models,
such as YOLO (You Only Look Once) [2] and Faster R-CNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural
Networks) [4], have demonstrated impressive accuracy and real-time performance. These models
have found applications in various fields, including autonomous vehicles, surveillance systems,
medical imaging, and more, showcasing the significance of object detection in enabling a wide
range of practical and innovative solutions.
268
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
Trade-off Between Speed and Accuracy: Real-time object detection systems often grapple with a
trade-off between speed and accuracy. Accelerated processing may entail model simplifications or
269
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
reductions in spatial resolution, potentially impacting detection accuracy [2]. Striking an optimal
equilibrium between speed and accuracy is imperative to meet real-time requisites while upholding
acceptable detection performance.
Multi-Scale Object Detection: Real-world scenes feature objects of varying scales, demanding
simultaneous detection of objects with diverse sizes [3]. Effectively addressing multi-scale objects
is essential for comprehensive scene comprehension.
Occlusion and Clutter: Effective object detection is hindered by occluded objects and cluttered
backgrounds. Robust algorithms are necessary to detect partially visible objects and manage
instances with overlapping characteristics.
Adaptation to Dynamic Environments: Real-world scenarios are inherently dynamic, requiring real-
time object detection systems to promptly adapt to environmental shifts, changes in lighting
conditions, and moving objects to sustain precision and reliability.
Small Object Detection: Detecting diminutive objects, especially those situated at a distance or
possessing low resolution, presents a challenge. Real-time object detection models must exhibit
sensitivity to small objects without compromising overall performance.
Annotated Data and Labeling: The curation of extensive annotated datasets for real-time object
detection can be labor-intensive. The availability of accurate annotations spanning diverse object
classes is pivotal for effective model training [6].
Resolving these challenges necessitates ongoing research and innovation, encompassing the
development of sophisticated algorithms, optimization strategies, and support from hardware
components. Real-time object detection systems, adept at swift and precise analysis of visual data,
possess the potential to revolutionize applications spanning industries, fostering intelligent and
secure interactions between machines and the physical world. Applications of Real-Time Object
Detection: Real-time object detection has permeated a plethora of applications, leveraging its
capacity for rapid and accurate detection and localization of objects within dynamic scenes.
Prominent applications include:
Autonomous Vehicles: Real-time object detection constitutes a foundational element of autonomous
driving systems, enabling vehicles to perceive and respond to pedestrians, vehicles, and obstacles
[7]. The technology plays a pivotal role in collision avoidance, lane tracking, and overall situational
awareness.
Surveillance and Security: Real-time object detection facilitates real-time monitoring and threat
assessment in surveillance systems [8]. It enables the identification of suspicious behaviors,
unattended baggage, or unauthorized access, contributing to heightened security measures.
Robotics: Robots endowed with real-time object detection capabilities navigate environments,
manipulate objects, and engage with their surroundings [9]. This enhances human-robot
collaborations and extends the autonomy of robotic systems.
Augmented Reality: Real-time object detection enhances augmented reality experiences by
overlaying digital content onto real-world objects [10]. It enables applications such as object
recognition, interactive gaming, and immersive visualization.
Medical Imaging: Real-time object detection finds utility in medical imaging, assisting radiologists
in identifying and localizing anatomical structures and anomalies [11]. It expedites diagnosis and
treatment planning, contributing to elevated patient care. These applications serve as compelling
exemplars of the extensive impact of real-time object detection on modern technological
landscapes. As advancements in artificial intelligence and computer vision continue to unfold, real-
time object detection systems are poised to reshape industries and domains, facilitating safer, more
efficient, and intelligent interactions between humans and machines.
Conclusion: Real-time object detection constitutes a cornerstone of contemporary computer vision,
enabling swift and accurate identification of objects within visual data streams. The fusion of deep
learning algorithms, hardware acceleration, and optimization strategies has catalyzed the
development of real-time object detection systems with applications spanning autonomous vehicles,
robotics, security, and beyond. Despite remarkable strides, challenges endure, encompassing
computational complexity, multi-scale object handling, and the delicate trade-offs between accuracy
270
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
and speed. Researchers and practitioners must collaborate in addressing these challenges,
cultivating innovative solutions and robust real-time object detection systems capable of flourishing
in complex and dynamic real-world scenarios. The trajectory of real-time object detection continues
to unfold, with future research poised to yield novel algorithms, architectures, and hardware
enhancements. This dynamic research domain remains pivotal to the advancement of artificial
intelligence, propelling intelligent systems toward heightened autonomy, efficiency, and
adaptability.
271
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
272
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
The development of deep learning-based approaches, such as YOLO and SSD, significantly
improved the speed and accuracy of object detection by introducing end-to-end learning and novel
architectures. These modern methods have largely replaced sliding window-based approaches in
practical applications, as they achieve real-time performance without the need for explicit window
scanning.
273
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
Haar-like features to enhance the detection of various objects and improve the efficiency of the
cascade classifier. Cascade classifiers have been historically successful in real-time face detection
and have also been adapted to detect other objects. They were groundbreaking at the time of their
introduction and have inspired subsequent research in the field of object detection. However, their
performance is limited compared to modern deep learning-based object detection methods, such as
YOLO and SSD, which have achieved higher accuracy and versatility. Nevertheless, cascade
classifiers remain a significant milestone in the history of object detection, showcasing the potential
of using a series of weak classifiers to efficiently filter out non-object regions and focus on potential
object regions.
274
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
Precision and Recall: Precision measures accurate positive predictions among all predicted
positives, while recall gauges accurate positive predictions among actual positives, evaluating
detection precision and the system's ability to identify target objects.
Average Precision (AP): AP averages precision values at different recall levels, synthesizing the
precision-recall curve for an overall performance assessment.
Intersection over Union (IoU): IoU quantifies overlap between predicted and ground truth
bounding boxes, determining true positive or false positive classifications.
Frames per Second (FPS): FPS indicates processing speed, crucial for real-time applications.
Inference Time: Inference time measures model processing duration per frame, reflecting real-time
efficiency.
Mean Average Precision (mAP): mAP calculates mean AP values across object classes for
comprehensive performance assessment.
Accuracy vs. Speed Trade-off: Balances accuracy and processing speed, aiding optimal model or
configuration selection.
Robustness: Evaluates performance under challenging scenarios, like occlusions and clutter.
Memory Footprint: Assesses model memory storage requirements, vital for resource-constrained
devices.
Power Efficiency: Gauges energy consumption, significant for power-limited devices.
Comprehensive evaluation integrates these metrics, tailored to application-specific requirements
and constraints.
275
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
YOLO (You Only Look 2016 Darknet, Very Fast Moderate to High Single pass, real-time
Once) YOLOv3, processing
YOLOv4
SSD (Single Shot 2016 Caffe, Fast Moderate to High Multi-scale feature maps,
MultiBox Detector) TensorFlow anchor boxes
Faster R-CNN (Region 2015 TensorFlow, Moderate High Region Proposal Network
Convolutional Neural PyTorch (RPN) for object proposals
Network)
RetinaNet 2017 TensorFlow, Moderate High Focal Loss for handling
PyTorch class imbalance
CenterNet 2019 PyTorch Fast Moderate to High Detects objects as points and
regresses to bounding boxes
HTC (Hybrid Task 2019 TensorFlow, Moderate to High Multi-task framework for
Cascade) PyTorch Fast improved accuracy
Sparse R-CNN 2021 PyTorch Fast High Utilizes sparsity for efficient
inference
276
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
Sparse R-CNN 2021 PyTorch Fast High Utilizes sparsity for efficient
inference
Note that "Speed" and "Accuracy" are relative terms and can vary depending on hardware, software
optimizations, and dataset used for training. Additionally, the field of computer vision is rapidly
evolving, and newer algorithms might have been developed since my last knowledge update.
Always refer to the latest research papers and benchmarks for the most up-to-date information.
Future directions include real-time 3D object detection, efficient hardware architectures, multi-
modal fusion, and incremental learning. Challenges encompass handling complex scenes,
adversarial attacks, resource constraints, and data bias, highlighting the need for ongoing research
and development to advance real-time object detection's accuracy, efficiency, and robustness across
evolving applications and domains.
References:
[1]S. Guefrachi, M. Jabra, and N. Alsharabi, "Deep learning based DeepFake video detection," in
2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA), Hail, Saudi Arabia,
2023, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ICSCA57840.2023.10087584.
[2] J. Redmon et al., "You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection," in Proceedings of
the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 779-788.
[3] W. Liu et al., "SSD: Single shot multibox detector," in European conference on computer vision,
2016, pp. 21-37. Springer.
[4] S. Ren et al., "Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal
networks," in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, pp. 91-99.
[5] M. Sandler et al., "Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks: Mobile networks for classification,
detection and segmentation," in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern
recognition, 2018, pp. 4510-4520.
[6] M. Everingham et al., "The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge," International Journal
of Computer Vision, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 303-338, 2010.
[7] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, "Are we ready for autonomous driving? the KITTI vision
benchmark suite," in Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012.
[8] L. C. Dua et al., "Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image
segmentation," in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp.
801-818.
[9] H.-C. Nguyen, T.-H. Nguyen, R. Scherer, V.-H. Le, "Unified End-to-End YOLOv5-HR-TCM
Framework for Automatic 2D/3D Human Pose Estimation for Real-Time Applications," Sensors,
vol. 22, no. 22, p. 5419, 2022. doi: 10.3390/s22145419.
[10] C. Cao et al., "Real-time object detection in augmented reality," IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 17-27, 2017.
[11] H. C. Shin et al., "Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN
architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,
vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1285-1298, 2016.
[12] Y. Duan, X. Chen, R. Houthooft, J. Schulman, P. Abbeel, "Benchmarking deep reinforcement
learning for continuous control," in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2016, pp. 1329-
1338.
[13] Y. Zhang, R. Grosse, "Track, then Decide: Category-Agnostic Vision-based Multi-Object
Tracking," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.07235, 2018.
277
J. Amr. Uni. 03 (2023) p.267 Naif Alsharabi
[14] V. Balntas, E. Riba, D. Ponsa, K. Mikolajczyk, "Learning local feature descriptors with triplets
and shallow convolutional neural networks," in BMVC, 2016, pp. 1-12.
[15] H. C. Shin et al., "Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN
architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning," IEEE transactions on medical imaging,
vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1285-1298, 2016.
[16] D. Pavllo, C. Feichtenhofer, D. Grangier, M. Auli, "3D human pose estimation in video with
temporal convolutions and semi-supervised training," in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 7753-7762.
[17] Y. Cao, J. Xu, S. Lin, F. Wei, H. Hu, "Diverse image-to-image translation via disentangled
representations," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2017, pp. 876-
886.
[18] M. S. Norouzzadeh et al., "Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in
camera-trap images with deep learning," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.
115, no. 25, pp. E5716-E5725, 2018.
[19] P. Y. Chen, C. C. Liu, C. H. Chuang, "Real-time Object Detection and Tracking for
Autonomous Vehicles," arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.05991, 2021.
[20] C. F. Liew, J. H. Lim, K. W. Chong, "Deep Learning Surveillance System for Object Detection
and Classification in Video Surveillance," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 105, pp. 35-42, 2017.
[21] R. S. Mohan and B. R. Babu, "A Survey on Visual Surveillance for Smart Retailing," ACM
Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1-34, 2020.
[22] J. Zhang, J. Zou, K. He, "Multi-Scale Object Detection with Feature Fusion and Scale
Equalizing," in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2020, pp. 9476-9485.
[23] N. Dalal, B. Triggs, "Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection," in Proceedings of
the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005, pp. 886-893.
[24] P. Viola, M. Jones, "Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features," in
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2001,
pp. 511-518.
[25] H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool, "SURF: Speeded up robust features," in European
Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2006, pp. 404-417.
[26] P. F. Felzenszwalb, R. B. Girshick, D. McAllester, D. Ramanan, "Object detection with
discriminatively trained part-based models," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
Intelligence, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1627-1645, 2010.
[27] J. R. Uijlings, K. E. Van De Sande, T. Gevers, A. W. Smeulders, "Selective search for object
recognition," International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 154-171, 2013.
[28] D. G. Lowe, "Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints," International Journal
of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91-110, 2004.
[29] H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, L. Van Gool, "SURF: Speeded up robust features," in European
conference on computer vision, 2006, pp. 404-417.
[30] R. Lienhart, J. Maydt, "An extended set of Haar-like features for efficient object detection," in
Proceedings of Image Processing, 2003.
[31] J. Redmon, A. Farhadi, "YOLOv3: An incremental improvement," arXiv preprint
arXiv:1804.02767, 2018.
[32] N. Sharma, P. D. Shenoy, "A Survey of Edge Computing Architectures for Real-time Analytics
of IoT Data," Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 2020.
[33] T. Y. Lin et al., "Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context," in D. Fleet; T. Pajdla, B.
Schiele, T. Tuytelaars (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, 2014.
278