GEC3/CONTEMPORARY WORLD

PRE-FINALS DRAFT 1
(1st SEM. SY 2023-2024)
Prof. Jocelyn A. DIANO

NAME OF TEAM LEADER:

OCSAN, CHLOIE, ANN
ASSISTANT LEADER:8
MARILAG, JOHN PAUL
ARTIST OF THE TEAM:
MIRALLES, JOHN PATRICK
MEMBERS
RESEARCHER 1:
PANGO, MARAIAH LYNA
RESEARCHER 2:
PILAR, STEAVEN
COURSE/YEAR LEVEL/SECTION:
BETCT-1A
DATE SUBMITTED
JANUARY 17. 2024
 DECISION TREE
STEP 1: OCCASION FOR DECISION
Genocide Attack in Myanmar

STEP 2: GOALS, VALUES, CONSTRAINTS

1. to define what is Genocide Attack in Myanmar
2. to discuss causes affecting Genocide Attack in Myanmar
3. identify alternative solutions affecting probable/ Genocide Attack in Myanmar
4.discuss possible outcomes/results Genocide Attack in Myanmar
5.Constract a decision tree affecting Genocide Attack in Myanmar and
6. recommend decisions affecting Genocide Attack in Myanmar

STEP 3: ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS

Alternative Solution 1: Expansion of Education

Cited in: Multistakeholder pledge: Rohingya Refugees - Expanded resilience, Enhanced

solutions | The Global Compact on Refugees | UNHCR. (n.d.). The Global Compact on
Refugees | UNHCR. https://globalcompactrefugees.org/multistakeholder-pledge-
rohingya-refugees-expanded-resilience-enhanced-solutions#:~:text=Opportunities%20to
%20support%20Rohingya%20refugees,skills%20development%20and%20livelihoods
%20activities.

Alternative Solution 2: Livelihood Activities

Cited in: Multistakeholder pledge: Rohingya Refugees - Expanded resilience, Enhanced solutions
| The Global Compact on Refugees | UNHCR. (n.d.). The Global Compact on Refugees |
UNHCR. https://globalcompactrefugees.org/multistakeholder-pledge-rohingya-refugees-expanded-
resilience-enhanced-solutions#:~:text=Opportunities%20to%20support%20Rohingya%20refugees,skills
%20development%20and%20livelihoods%20activities

Alternative Solution 3 : Funding of Livelihood activities

Cited in: End of Mission Statement - OHCHR
https://bangkok.ohchr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ENG-21.06.2023-UNSR-Myanmar-EoM-
Statement-FINAL.pdf

STEP 4: PROBABLE/POSSIBLE OUTCOMES/RESULTS

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION 1:
Expansion of Education
GOOD OUTCOME: Education can raise awareness about historical, cultural and social factors
contributing to ethnic and religious tensions.
BAD OUTCOME: The expansion of education could unintentionally reinforce social divisions,
heightening polarization and hostility between ethnic or religious groups.

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION 2:
Livelihood Activities
GOOD OUTCOME: Can cope with and recover from the stresses and shocks and maintain or enhance its
capabilities and assets both now and in the future without undermining the natural resource base
BAD OUTCOME: Economic Disruption: A genocide can seriously impair a community's economy by
upsetting commercial, industrial, and agricultural operations and significantly decreasing the standard of
living.

ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION 3:
Humanitarian Aid and support
GOOD OUTCOME: Essential aid and support can rebuild communities, offering a path to recovery and
resilience for those affected by crisis.
BAD OUTCOME: Mismanagement of aid resources may lead to dependency, hindering the long-term
self-sufficiency and development of affected communities.

STEP 5: THE DECISION

Decision 1: Expansion of education
•Expansion of education is crucial for fostering awareness and understanding among diverse
communities. However, caution is needed to prevent unintended consequences, as the expansion might
unintentionally intensify social divisions, resulting in increased division and tension.

Decision 2: Livelihood Activities

•Livelihood activities in addressing the Myanmar genocide necessitates prioritizing immediate relief and
sustainable strategies, encompassing coping, recovery, and enhancing community capabilities. In
recognizing the economic disruption caused, efforts should focus on rebuilding commercial, industrial,
and agricultural operations to restore stability and improve the standard of living for the impacted
population. A decision must balance both short-term and long-term considerations for an effective
recovery plan.
Decision 3. Humanitarian Aid and support
•To address the Humanitarian Aid and Support to Genocide in Myanmar, a decision must prioritize
efficiently allocating aid for community rebuilding. Implementing measures to prevent aid
mismanagement is crucial to avoid dependency, ensuring long-term self-sufficiency. Striking a balance
between immediate relief and sustainable, community-driven initiatives is essential for an informed and
effective decision.

BIBLIOGRAPHY (APA STYLE)

(Dussich, J). (2018). The Ongoing Genocidal Crisis of the Rohingya Minority in Myanmar. https://policy-
research.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/002-Rohyngya.pdf

Martuscelli, P.N., Ahmed, B. and Sammonds, P. (2022) Defying genocide in Myanmar: everyday
resistance narratives of Rohingyas. Journal of Genocide Research.
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/190822/1/Defying%20Genocide%20in%20Myanmar%20Everyday
%20Resistance%20Narratives%20of%20Rohingyas.pdf

(Schaack, B.).(2019). Determining the Commission of Genocide in Myanmar.

https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Genocide-Against-the-Rohingya-JICL.pdf