Pragmatics studies how context contributes to meaning in communication. It examines speech acts, which are communicative acts like requesting, promising, ordering. There are several types of speech acts including representatives that represent facts, commissives that commit speakers, directives that make hearers act, and expressives that indicate attitudes. Pragmatics also analyzes how information is structured in discourse based on factors like given vs. new information, topic, contrast, and definiteness. It examines how sentences are transformed through mechanisms like fronting, left/right dislocation, clefting, and pseudoclefts to convey pragmatic meanings.
Pragmatics studies how context contributes to meaning in communication. It examines speech acts, which are communicative acts like requesting, promising, ordering. There are several types of speech acts including representatives that represent facts, commissives that commit speakers, directives that make hearers act, and expressives that indicate attitudes. Pragmatics also analyzes how information is structured in discourse based on factors like given vs. new information, topic, contrast, and definiteness. It examines how sentences are transformed through mechanisms like fronting, left/right dislocation, clefting, and pseudoclefts to convey pragmatic meanings.
Pragmatics studies how context contributes to meaning in communication. It examines speech acts, which are communicative acts like requesting, promising, ordering. There are several types of speech acts including representatives that represent facts, commissives that commit speakers, directives that make hearers act, and expressives that indicate attitudes. Pragmatics also analyzes how information is structured in discourse based on factors like given vs. new information, topic, contrast, and definiteness. It examines how sentences are transformed through mechanisms like fronting, left/right dislocation, clefting, and pseudoclefts to convey pragmatic meanings.
Pragmatics is a subfield of semiotics that studies the
ways in which context contributes to meaning. Speech Acts Different acts may be carried out by using language that is different from physical acts like drinking a glass of water, or mental acts like thinking about drinking a glass of water. Speech acts include asking for a glass of water, promising to drink a glass of water threatening to drink a glass of water, or ordering someone to drink a glass of water, and so on. Most of these are communicative acts, since speech and even language are not strictly required. Thus someone can ask for a glass of water by pointing to a pitcher and miming the act of drinking. Types of Speech Acts Representatives These represent states of affairs, such as assertions, statemensts, claims, hypotheses, descriptions, and sugestions. They are regarded as being true or false. Comissives These commit speakers to sth, such as promises, pledges, threats, and vows. Directives Makes the hearer carry out some action: commands, requests, challenges, invitations and entreaties. Declaratives Bring about the state of affairs: blessings, baptisms, arrests, marrying etc. Expressives These indicate the speaker’s attitude, such as greetings, apologies, congratulations, condolences, and thanksgivings. Verdictives Verdictives make assessments or judgements: ranking, assessing, appraising, condemning. The Three Aspects of Speech Acts Locution, Illocution, Perlocution Here the denotative meaning is not the focus of attention, but rather the connotative meaning. Locution Locution, also known as utterance act or acoustic chain, is basically the acoustic utterance that can be phonetically transcribed. Example: You have eye inflammation. Illocution Sometimes, you may have multiple intention behind an utterance, so we say that there are more illocutionary acts in the speech act. Example: You have eye inflammation. This is an act of ordering the hearer to go to an ophthalmologist to have eye examination or to treat the eye, depending on the context. Perlocution (reaction) : the hearer goes to an ophthalmologist or treats the eye. Perlocution Perlocution is the effect of the speech act on the hearer. It has two aspects of the perlocutionary act. • First, the effect that the sender wants to evoke in the listener. • Second, the effect that is finally achieved. Example 1: You have eye inflammation. What’s the reaction? The hearer goes to an ophthalmologist or treats his eyes. Example 2: An order from someone without authority: the expected effect was obedience; however, disobedience was eventually achieved. Cooperative Principle of Pragmatics has four sub-parts or maxims: 1. The maxim of quality: speakers’ contributions ought to be true. 2. The maxim of quantity. Speakers’ contributions should be as informative as required; not saying either too little or too much. 3. The maxim of relevance: Contributions should relate to the purposes of the exchange. 4. The maxim of manner: Contributions should be clear-in particular, they should be orderly and brief, avoiding obscurity and ambiguity. Information Structure Information is organized based on the context. If the information does not fit the context, we are confused. Ahmad: “Hi, Mahmood. Pleased to see you. Do you want to have a cup of tea with me? Mahmood: “Sorry I can’t.” Ahmad: “Please.” Mahmood: “My father drinks coffee.” Ahmad: “What on earth are you talking about?” Categories of Information Structure • Given and New Information: New information receives more stress and expressed more elaborately than those indicating old or known information. Example: I bought the book from this new bookstore yesterday. It is located right behind the Languages and Literature Faculty building. known elements = I and yesterday New Information = New bookstore “further explanation is needed” Topic: • The topic is the core of attention in a sentence. It was you who got the highest marks on the exam! Sometimes, the topic is outside the spoken language. “O damn it!” Topic: bad luck or mischief. Contrast • Sometimes, nouns stand in opposition to each other. Only you can get the highest marks. It was not me but you who disturbed the class. Definiteness It is said “definite”, when the listener is able to identify something without difficulty. The marker is in my hand. The listener already knows which marker is meant. Referentiality When noun phrases refer to a particular entity, they are referential. Or the referential meaning directly relates with the references. He is the man I met at the airport. The word “man” is referential, for it is defined more precisely by the secondary clause. Nonreferentiality Nonreferential phrases can not be derived from the general content of the phrase. It’s fun to study linguistics. Pragmatic Categories In syntax, the same deep structure in a sentence may be transformed into different surface structures. 1. Fronting: phrases are moved to the front part of the sentence. a. Givenness: Linguistics, I can learn with ease. In the above example, the speaker presumes that the listener already knows he can learn linguistics with ease. Therefor, that part of the sentence is a “given”: a known fact. b. Contrast: Contrast is expressed through fronting i.e. the unusual position of “Ahmad” puts emphasis on like/dislike. I really hate Mahmood. Ahmad I find nice.” Left Dislocation This is also similar to “Fronting”: a noun is moved from its usual place to the left i.e. front of the sentence (outside the clause boundries) to indicate givenness or contrast. The difference is that the noun remains in the form of a pronoun in its original place as well. Linguistics, I can learn it with ease. Right dislocation Right dislocation often occurs with a clarifying afterthought: They went to the store is a coherent sentence, but Mary and Peter is added afterward to clarify exactly who they are They went to the store, Mary and Peter. Clefting (to divide / split) Ahmad lent the money to Mahmood. It + be + that … It was Ahmad that Mahmood lent the money to. Pseudocleft Wh – word (usually “what”) + … + Be” What Ahmad lent to Mahmood was money. Here, the listener can focus more readily on the new information. What she bought is a pair of shoes with red flowers. Sentence Stress Stress can be used to represent new information or can mark opposition. Stress refers to intonation. In fronting and left-dislocation, stress is added to strengthen the emphasis on the acoustic level. Indirect Speech acts: I would like to know if he got 100 on the test. I wonder whether he got 100 on the test. The window is still open! I must have asked you a hundred times to keep that window closed!