This document discusses a motion to intervene in a legal case. It argues that the movant has a legal interest to intervene because they will be prejudiced by the results of the case. It also states that the intervention will not cause undue delay and that the motion was filed in a timely manner. The movant is requesting that the court reconsider its previous order and allow the movant to intervene in the cases.
This document discusses a motion to intervene in a legal case. It argues that the movant has a legal interest to intervene because they will be prejudiced by the results of the case. It also states that the intervention will not cause undue delay and that the motion was filed in a timely manner. The movant is requesting that the court reconsider its previous order and allow the movant to intervene in the cases.
This document discusses a motion to intervene in a legal case. It argues that the movant has a legal interest to intervene because they will be prejudiced by the results of the case. It also states that the intervention will not cause undue delay and that the motion was filed in a timely manner. The movant is requesting that the court reconsider its previous order and allow the movant to intervene in the cases.
to state, he stands to be prejudiced by the results of these
cases, in case the judgment is adverse.
e) By jurisprudence rinder Nephtne tt. Meralco, as already
cited, herein movant falls under the three (3) eiernents required by the Supreme Court for the right to intervene be granted.
0 First, movant has a legal interest to intelene in the
present case. A rnovant for intervention must have legai interest either (i) in the matter in litigation, (ii) in the success of either of the parties, or (iii) against both parties. The movant may also intervene if he or she is (iv) so situated as to be adversely affected by a distribution or other disposition of property in the court's custody. Legal interest is present when the intervenor will either gain or lose as a direct effect of the judgment. The legal interest must be actual and material, direct, and immediate. ry
g) Second, movants intervention will not unduly delay or
prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the accused and of the State. There is no showing under the circumstances that the mot.ant's inten ention will delay the proceedings.
h) Third, movant timelr,'filed the motion for intervention at
the RTC.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, it is most respectfully
prayed of this Honorable Court to RECoNSTDER its order dated December zo, 2o2S for not being pursuant to existing and prevailing jurisprudence, with utmost respect and submission, as follows:
1. To ALLOW the herein movant to INTERVENE in these
CASCS;
z. To ISSUE an ORDER for the immediate RELEASE of the
vehicle, most particularly Silver Mitsubishi Adventure GIJ(2, with Engine No. 4D56AAS7br4, C.R. No. z958z5ro6 and with Plate No. FAD2889 which is now in the custody and possession of the E.B. Magalona PNP.
3. Other relief that isiust and equitable under the circumstances