Dosha Head Work Design

DATA SHEET FOR CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE USING THE FLOAT GAUGING TECHNIQUE
Enter data in green cells Calculations are performed in yellow cells
Date: Time at start:

Station: Time at end:
Name of site manager:
Start from left bank, divide stream into 5-10 DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 1 (upstream cross
equal sections section)
Total Width (metres): 3

Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm)
0 cm (Left bank) 0 0
20 6
40 13
60 16
80 17
90 17
110 20
130 20
150 19
170 16
190 10
210 7
230 5
(Edge right bank) 250 0
Mean depth (m): 0.12
Area of Cross section profile (m2): 0.36
FLOAT MEASUREMENTS VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 1

Length of reach (metres): 15
Section (as per above) Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds)
0 cm (Left bank) 0 0
20 10.62
40 21.96
60 10.89
80 11.89
90 11.43
110 10.71
130 11.48
150 11.43
170 20.84
190 11.66
(Edge right bank) 210 19.89
Average no of seconds over the reach: 13
Average velocity for measurement 1 (m/s): 1.18
CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE (m3/s) OBSERVATIONS (weather, flow conditions, diffi
Average cross section area: 0.353

Average measured velocity (m/s): 1.18
Velocity coefficient: 0.65
Average channel velocity (m/s): 0.77
Discharge (Flow) (m3/s): 0.700 700.000

Sebate wodel river at febraruy 5/2006
are performed in yellow cells Do not change red cells
Staff Gauge at start:

Staff Gauge at end:
DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 2 (middle cross DEPTH at Cross Section Profile 3 (downstream
section) cross section)
Total Width (metres): 3.2 Total Width (metres): 3.1

Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm) Distance from LB (cm) Water Depth (cm)
0 0 0 0
20 11 20 9
40 18 40 9
60 21 60 6
80 17 80 17
90 22 90 13
110 19 110 18
130 18 130 15
150 14 150 10
170 10 170 8
190 8 190 9
210 8 210 0
230 0 230
250 250
0.13 0.10
0.41 0.29
VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 2 VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 3

15 15
Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds) Distance from LB (m) Time (seconds)
0 0 0 0
20 10.62 20 10.62
40 21.96 40 21.96
60 10.89 60 10.89
80 11.89 80 11.89
90 11.43 90 11.43
110 10.71 110 10.71
130 11.48 130 11.48
150 11.43 150 11.43
170 20.84 170 20.84
190 11.66 190 11.66
210 19.89 210 19.89
13 13
1.18 1.18
ONS (weather, flow conditions, difficulties experienced during measurement)
ls
minimum river bed level 1904.55 abi abi:
Table: TWD Computation at Wier Axis From CAD From CA
Stage, H (m) Tail water Manning's Water Wetted Hydraulic Longitudi Velocity, V
depth Roughness, n Area, A primeter, P(m) Radius, R nal Slope, (m/s)
(m2) (m) S (m/m)
1904.550 0.000 0.035 0 0 #DIV/0! 0.009 0.00

1905.050 0.500 0.035 3.519 11.455 0.31 0.009 1.21
1905.550 1.000 0.035 9.892 15.881 0.62 0.009 1.94
1906.050 1.500 0.035 18.811 19.942 0.94 0.009 2.56
abi
1906.550 2.000
Top of bank 0.035 29.358 23.938 1.23 0.009 3.05
1907.050 2.500 0.035 41.721 28.063 1.49 0.009 3.47
1907.550 3.000 0.035 59.383 32.23 1.84 0.009 4.01
1908.050 3.500 0.035 74.104 36.673 2.02 0.009 4.26
1908.550 4.000 0.035 92.905 38.894 2.39 0.009 4.76
1909.050 4.500 0.035 113.87 45.23 2.52 0.009 4.93
INTERPOLAT FOR QD Tell water depth Velocity

237.84 1907.550 237.84 3.000 237.842 4.01
300 1907.949 300 3.399 300.000 4.208 3.17288991
315.64 1908.050 315.64 3.500 315.643 4.26
2171
MAX 300.00
2170
2169
2168
2
2167
2166
2165
0 2 4 6
AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE

ACCUMU
LATIVE
CH ELV PD HEIGHT Total area Hav Iav
0 1905.75801 0 0 0
1 1905.592 1 0.16601 0.08
2 1905.482 1 0.11 0.19
3 1905.373 1 0.109 0.22
4 1905.264 1 0.109 0.27
5 1905.154 1 0.11 0.33
6 1905.045 1 0.109 0.38
7 1904.935 1 0.11 0.44
8 1904.826 1 0.109 0.49
9 1904.716 1 0.11 0.55
9.15 1904.7 0 0.016 0.13
10 1904.696 1 0.004 0.03
11 1904.692 1 0.004 0.02
12 1904.687 1 0.005 0.03
13 1904.682 1 0.005 0.03
14 1904.678 1 0.004 0.03
15 1904.673 1 0.005 0.04
16 1904.669 1 0.004 0.03
17 1904.664 1 0.005 0.04
18 1904.659 1 0.005 0.05
19 1904.655 1 0.004 0.04
20 1904.65 1 0.005 0.05
21 1904.646 1 0.004 0.04
22 1904.641 1 0.005 0.06
23 1904.636 1 0.005 0.06
24 1904.632 1 0.004 0.05
25 1904.627 1 0.005 0.06
26 1904.623 1 0.004 0.05
27 1904.618 1 0.005 0.07
28 1904.614 1 0.004 0.06
29 1904.609 1 0.005 0.07
30 1904.604 1 0.005 0.08
31 1904.6 1 0.004 0.06
32 1904.595 1 0.005 0.08
33 1904.591 1 0.004 0.07
34 1904.586 1 0.005 0.09
35 1904.581 1 0.005 0.09
36 1904.577 1 0.004 0.07
37 1904.572 1 0.005 0.09
38 1904.568 1 0.004 0.08
39 1904.563 1 0.005 0.10
40 1904.559 1 0.004 0.08
41 1904.554 1 0.005 0.10
42 1904.549 1 0.005 0.11
43 1904.545 1 0.004 0.09
44 1904.54 1 0.005 0.11
44.04 1904.54 0 0 0.00
45 1904.533 1 0.007 0.16
46 1904.527 1 0.006 0.14
47 1904.52 1 0.007 0.17
48 1904.513 1 0.007 0.17
49 1904.506 1 0.007 0.17
50 1904.499 1 0.007 0.18
51 1904.492 1 0.007 0.18
52 1904.486 1 0.006 0.16
53 1904.479 1 0.007 0.19
54 1904.472 1 0.007 0.19
55 1904.465 1 0.007 0.20
56 1904.458 1 0.007 0.20
57 1904.451 1 0.007 0.20
58 1904.445 1 0.006 0.18
59 1904.438 1 0.007 0.21
60 1904.431 1 0.007 0.21
61 1904.424 1 0.007 0.22
0.879042 0.007
62 1904.417 1 0.007 0.22
63 1904.41 1 0.007 0.22
64 1904.404 1 0.006 0.20
65 1904.397 1 0.007 0.23
66 1904.39 1 0.007 0.23
67 1904.383 1 0.007 0.24
68 1904.376 1 0.007 0.24
69 1904.369 1 0.007 0.25
70 1904.363 1 0.006 0.21
71 1904.356 1 0.007 0.25
72 1904.349 1 0.007 0.26
73 1904.342 1 0.007 0.26
74 1904.335 1 0.007 0.26
75 1904.328 1 0.007 0.27
75.02 1904.328 0 0 0.00
76 1904.367 1 -0.039 -1.48
77 1904.406 1 -0.039 -1.52
77.69 1904.433 1 -0.027 -1.07
78 1904.427 0 0.006 0.22
78.46 1904.419 0 0.008 0.32
79 1904.418 1 0.001 0.04
80 1904.418 1 0 0.00
81 1904.417 1 0.001 0.04
82 1904.417 1 0 0.00
83 1904.416 1 0.001 0.04
84 1904.416 1 0 0.00
85 1904.415 1 0.001 0.04
86 1904.415 1 0 0.00
87 1904.414 1 0.001 0.04
88 1904.414 1 0 0.00
89 1904.413 1 0.001 0.04
90 1904.413 1 0 0.00
91 1904.412 1 0.001 0.05
92 1904.412 1 0 0.00
93 1904.411 1 0.001 0.05
94 1904.411 1 0 0.00
95 1904.41 1 0.001 0.05
96 1904.41 1 0 0.00
97 1904.409 1 0.001 0.05
98 1904.409 1 0 0.00
99 1904.408 1 0.001 0.05
100 1904.408 1 0 0.00
101 1904.407 1 0.001 0.05
101.89 1904.407 1 0 0.00
102 1904.406 0 0.001 0.05
102.86 1904.395 1 0.011 0.57
103 1904.396 0 -0.001 -0.05
104 1904.402 1 -0.006 -0.31
105 1904.3 1 0.102 5.35
105.81 1904.3 1 0 0.05
106 1904.3 0 0 0.00
106.3 1904.3 0 0 0.00
107 1904.3 1 0 0.00
107.66 1904.3 1 0 0.00
108 1904.1 0 0.2 10.80
109 1904.1 1 0 0.10
109.84 1904.1 1 0 0.00
110 1904.1 0 0 0.00
111 1904 1 0.1 5.55
112 1904 1 0 0.05
113 1904 1 0 0.00
114 1904 1 0 0.00
115 1904 1 0 0.00
116 1904 1 0 0.00
117 1904 1 0 0.00
118 1903.8 1 0.2 11.80
118.32 1903.8 0 0 0.10
119 1903.8 1 0 0.00
120 1903.8 1 0 0.00
120.39 1903.8 0 0 0.00
120.71 1903.8 0 0 0.00
121 1903.8 0 0 0.00
122 1903.8 1 0 0.00
123 1903.8 1 0 0.00
124 1903.8 1 0 0.00
125 1903.58 1 0.22 13.75
126 1903.58 1 0 0.11
127 1903.58 1 0 0.00
128 1903.58 1 0 0.00
129 1903.58 1 0 0.00
129.12 1903.58 0 0 0.00
129.12 1903.58 129.12 2.18 56.75
abi:
From CAD TWD at Wier Site
Discharge, 1,908.0
Q (m3/s)
1,907.5
1,907.0
0.00
4.27 1,906.5
19.23
1,906.0
48.22
Stage, H (m)
89.64 1,905.5
144.83
237.84 1,905.0
315.64 1,904.5
442.42
561.59 1,904.0
1,903.5
1,903.0
0 50 100 150
Discharge, Q (m3/s)
8
2167.95
5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Column X
-12
4
1906
0
AVERAGE
50
RIVER BED SLOPE 100
1905
f(x) = − 0.00813918142095045 x + 1904.96302062525
2166.68
@ 53m
1904
1903
1902
1903
1902
D at Wier Site
DI EL
0 2169.083
1 2168.775
1.53 2168.613
2 2168.428
2.94 2168.063
3 2168.038
4 2167.662
5 2167.423
100 150 200 250 5.2 2167.375
Discharge, Q (m3/s) 5.79 2167.47
6 2167.456
7 2167.388
8 2167.32
8.06 2167.316
9 2167.01
9.99 2166.689
10 2166.696
11 2167.127
2167.95 12 2167.558
13 2167.99
14 2168.421
15 2168.853
16 2169.284
17 2169.715
17.2 2169.811
150
0.055
TOTAL
COMMAND DUTY(L/ Depth of Depth of
AREA(HEC) S/HEC) Q(L/S) Q(m3/S) water(m) canal(m) COMMAND AREA
LS 95 0.92 87.4 0.0874 0.55 0.55 0.7 LS
TOTAL 0.0874
Q 30%Q Com
125 37.5 95.108696 87.5 87.5 1000
95 920
0.92 3576960
Design of Main canal (left side canal )based on Manning's equation

Masonry lined
GIVEN : Q = 0.087
b/d = 2
m= 0 d
n= 0.018
So = 0.001
Assume d= 0.55 b
b= 0.90
Calculate A=b*d+md^2 0.495

P=b+2d(1+m^2)^0.5 2.000
R =A/P 0.248
Required
V=1/n*(R)^2/3*(So)^0.5 0.693 discharge =
Q =A*V 0.343 0.0874
Assumed free board
F= 0.1000
Summary of design parameters
Side slope = 0
Bed slope = 0.10%
Depth of flow = 0.55
Bottom width = 0.90
Depth of canal = 0.65
COMMAND AREA SC4 353303
95 0.00092 TC2 88269
95 3576.96 693.32617642 TC5 192772
TC3 71851
TC1 206671
MC 140304 1053170
893050 105.317
20.6671
28.5714285714 0.09327379 2.66496544 r^2/3

2.665
62
20.666667
3100000
2170000 43200
50.2314815
PART-1. WEIR HEIGHT DETERMINA
NO REQUIRED DATA
1 Minimum river bed level=
river bed level=
2 Water depth in the canal(LEFT SIDE MC) = DLS
3 length of main canal from the head regulator to the 1st off-take(LEFT SIDE)
4 Bed slope of the main canal(left side), S (LS)
5 Peak irrigable land level in the command area(LS)
6 Tell water level from rating curve for Q D,TWD
7 Design discharge from perivious QD =
8 Head loss across head regulator =
9 Head loss at the Turn out =
10 Operational head losses
Head loss along
11
Left side MC, hf=
12 Thus tell water depth (TWD) in meter
OUT PUT
1 Weir Crest Level (WCL)=
2 Bottom intake level=Max. command level + HL along MC(LEFT SIDE)
3 Weir Height considering Left side command=
Avaliable driving head (for left side Main canal) =
4
Minimum driving head for LS main Canal full supply discharge
5
PART-2. DISCHARGE COOFICIENT DETER

SELECTION OF WEIR TYPE:-The weir type is selected from different angles.Some of t
availability,foundation of the seat,height of the weir,the transported materials during flood time, Con
2 ogee type constructed as cyclyopean concrete with proper capping of reinforced concrete. In this pro
and the abutments.
REQUIRED DATA
3 C (for ogee crested weir) from tabel =
4 Top width of existing river=
5 N(no divide wall)
6 Thickness off D.wall(t)
7 Pier(divide wall) Condition (Kp) from tabel
8 Abutument Condition(Ka)
9 Weir Height considering Left side command=
10 Design discharge from perivious QD =
11 Upstream water depth P= (RBL-WCL)
OUT PUT
The depth of approach head (weir height/head of water above the crest i.e. h/Hd) and submergence need to b
applied for the assumed coefficient of discharge or not.
12 Total head over the crust = QD = CLHe3/2 FROM WHICH >> He = (QD/CL)2/3
13 He = Hd+Hav; Hav=Va2/2g where Va =Q/A = QD/(L*(h+Hd)) therefor He =Hd+
(QD/(L*(h+Hd)))^2/2g
He = Hd+Hav; Hav=Va2/2g where Va =Q/A = QD/(L*(h+Hd)) therefor He =Hd+
(QD/(L*(h+Hd)))^2/2g
14
15
Hd =
16 Check effect of height of spillway on……………………….…... Cd=(H/H d)
17 C is affected by depth of aproach ……………and Cd =
Effective length of the designed weir dimension………………………………..
18 (Le) = L-2*[N*Kp+Ka]*He
Trail-1 Le =
He =
Trail-2 Le =
He =
Trail-3 Le =
19 Check for velocity head (Ha) =Ha =V2/2g where

V = Qd/A….. that is …………….Qd/(L+N*t)*(H+He)
Ha=
Check for D/S approne effect
D/S submergenc effect(Hd+H/He) = (He+H)/He
Check for D/S submerjence effect
D/S submergenc effect(h/He) = (He+H-d)/He
PART-3. CHECK FOR AFLUX

20 U/s HFL = U/s bed level +weir height+Hd
21 U/s TEL =U/s HFL +approach velocity head
22 D/s HFL=River bed +Tail water depth
23 D/s TEL=D/sHFL+V22/2g,
24 Aproachi Velocity head = Ha =V22/2g
25 D/s TEL=
26 Aflux
PART-4. WEIR PROFILE DETERMINA

REQUIRED DATA
Selected weir Type = Vertical Ogee weir
K
n
Hd = He =
Down stream slope =H : V 0.8

(Dy/Dx) =
OUT PUT
20 4.1. determination of D/S face

Down stream profile Xn = K* Hdn-1*Y
X1.85 =2*Hd0.85*Y
Y =X1.85/2*Hd0.85
Y =X1.85/2*1.0480.85
Y =X1.85/2.082
dy/dx(X1.85/2.082) =
1.85*X1.85-1/2.082
1.85*X0.85/2.082
Goal seek
X=
Y=
x 0 0.67
y 0 0.12
0 -0.12
21 Up stream profile determination……………. Y =((0.724(X+0.27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.4
The U/S profile extend up to X=-0.27Hd =

Y=
4.2. determination of U/S face

X 0 -0.3159
Y 0 0.048
0 -0.048
4.3. determination Rivers curve

22
D/S riverse curve ditermination Hd =
Ro = 0.305*10 k
K = (V+6.4Hd+4.88)/(3.6Hd+19.5)
V = (2g(H+0.5Hd)0.5
PART-5. HYDRAULIC JUMP DETER

REQUIRED DATA
Up stream river bed level (U/S RBL )=
Weir height (H) =
Weir crest level (WCL) =
Thus tell water depth (TWD) in meter(D=Y2)
Design discharge from perivious QD =
Effective Length Leff =
Down stream river bed level (D/S RBL) =
He =( Q/Cle)2/3
design discharge per meter width (q)
Ha =( Va2/2g) = (Q/Y1)2/2g
Hd
OUT PUT
Trial-1 Applying Bernoulli's Equation b/n u/s and at the toe of spillway >>>> E1=W2
Q =AV1 >> q/Le = AV1 = V1 = q/Y1
H+He = Y1+ (V12/2g)
4.9333 Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g)
GOAL SEEK
Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g) = 4.933
Y1 0.8613
solve by goal seek 4.933
Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

V1 = q/Y1 8.93770279663057
Fr1 = 3.07
Ha1 = 4.0715
from Y1/Y2 = 1/2*(-1+√(1+8F12)
Y2 = 3.34
V2 = 2.305
aaa:
Ha2 = 0.271 If d = d2-d3 = 0.00m OK! For
0<=d<=0.40m NO NEED of
Head loss (HL) = (Y2-Y1)3/(4Y1Y2) 1.323 depressing the downstream stilling
Difference B/n Y2 AND TWD i.e (Y2-TWD)= -0.0602 basin level by depth d
KIYA:
the position of the jum
5.1. Position of the jump is estimated using ble
curve method
The discharge per unit width = q =CdH3/2
Where H =U/S TEL-WCL = 2.340
Cd = 2.156
q (m3/s/m)= 7.72
WCL 1907.15
U/S TEL = 1909.399
D/S TEL = 1908.220 KIYA:
HL = 1.179 for the given HL & q Ef2
can be read from blench
Ef2 3.400 curve plate 10.1 refer SEE THE REMARK
garge page 550-553
KIYA:
for the given HL & q Ef2
can be read from blench
curve plate 10.1 refer SEE THE REMARK
Location of the Jump = D/S TEL - Ef2 1904.82 garge page 550-553
5.2. Length of D/s aprone

Length of the jump = 5-6*(Y2-Y1) = 14.87
REMARK ;- Since there was no detail Head work Geological report and as we obserb KIYA:
during site visite the top part of the river geology weatherd it is higly recommend to remove Since the foundation
the weathered part FOR A DEPTH OF 0.5M and provide C-20 plain concrete for the given rock
length.
Accourding to Bligh's L =2.21C√(HL/10)
Take "C" Based on foundation material in our case the
foundation is belived to fine sand 15.000
L= 11.4
Provide an average D/S apron length = 14.9
Tickness of apron for U/S 0.2
U/S Apron length considering the river foundation take 3.0
A Nominial length of 3
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
Case-1
Crest level(CL) 1907.147
RBL 1904.550
C= 2.15566416679408
Lef = 38.97
H 2.60
Hd=He 2.34
TWD 3.40
OUT PUT
CASE-2
Stage, H (m) Q (m3/s) He=(Q/CL)2/3 (m)
1904.55 0.00 0.00

1905.05 4.27 0.14
1905.55 19.23 0.37
1906.05 48.22 0.69
1906.55 89.64 1.04
1907.05 144.83 1.44
1907.55 237.84 2.00
1907.949466035 300.00 2.34
1908.05 315.64 2.42
1908.55 442.42 3.03
1909.05 561.59 3.55
q(m3/s/m) HL=U/sTEL-D/s TEL Ef1=U/S TEL-RBL(m)
0 2.597 2.597
0.11 2.227 2.734
0.49 1.952 2.971
1.24 1.753 3.288
2.30 1.589 3.641
3.72 1.463 4.035
6.10 1.498 4.598
7.70 1.417 4.933
8.10 1.393 5.014
11.35 1.472 5.624
14.41 1.468 6.146
PART-6. STILLING BASIN DESIG

REQUIRED DATA
Fr1 =
V1 =
TWD
Y1
Y2 =
OUT PUT
TWD/Y2
Recommended minimum water depth in the basin
FOR FR < 2.5 U.S.B.R recommended type of basin is Type-I, by providing simple
horizontal pool with cistern level lowered by 0.1mfrom river bed with Y2=YT
Ratio of Length of stilling basin & Y2 from the graph (L/Y2) =

Stilling basin free board to over come over toping=0.1*(V1+Y2)
Then length of the basin…..Case-1 using graph for Case-1 for Fr read L/Y2 …..L =
L/Y2 also in case-2 using L =5(Y2-Y1)
Case-2 L= 6(Y2-Y1) ….=
Height of end sill (h4) = (h4/Y1) * Y1 where
Height of baffel block (h3) = (h3/Y1) * Y1 where
from graph "h4/Y1" =
from graph "h3/Y1" =
Height of Chut blocks (HCB) = Y1 =
Width of Chut blocks (WCB) = WCB=Y1 =
Length of Chut blocks (LCB) = WCB=2*Y1 =
Spacing between chutblocks & retaning wall (SCB) = 0.5Y1
Spacing between Baffel blocks & retaning wall (SBB) = 0.375Y2
If Baffel Blocks provided lengeth of Stilling basin will redeused by 1.25Y1 from stilling
basin with out Baffel blocks (L) =L-1.25Y2
Part-7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS AND PERVI

7.1. Determination of cutoff (scour depth)
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
Average particl size (D), The river bed is composed of large cobbels withgravels and sand
design discharge per meter width (q)
Tail water depth (TWD) =
Weir height=H
River bed level(RBL)
U/S HFL
D/S HFL
D/S stiling basin level
Depth of Scour below high flood level (i.e. From MFL to Bottom of u/s Cutoff)
(R = 1.35(q 2/f)1/3 = Where
Lacy's silt factor ( f = 1.76√d) = f=
So Depth of scour will be R=
Down stream cutt-off (D/S Cut-off) = 1.5*R =
upstream cut off (U/S Cut-off) = 1.25* R =
Reduce level of bottom of u/s cut off =(U/S HFL-1.25R)
Depth of U/S cut off bellow river bed level
Tickness of cut off for both U/S and D/S
Reduce level of bottom of d/s cut off = (D/S HFL-1.5R)
Depth of D/S cut off bellow river bed level
bottom level of u/s cut off
bottom level of d/s cut off
Up Stream Apron lengths & Depths=L=4C(h/33)1/2 where C=12
so use U/S apron length (L) = 3meter
U/S and D/S Lunching aprone
provide for D/S cut off andUp stream cut of Lunching apron
Average river bolder diameter D
provide D/S lunching apron lendth L= 1.5D
N.B. Provide 2meter Lunchin apron having a diameter of stone > 1meter
Post Jump Height (Y2) =

D/S Cistern level
Cestern Level
River bed level (RBL) =
Weir height (H) =
Tail water depth (TWD) =
Design Head (Hd) =He
U/S Design Head (Hd) =
U/S Velocity Head (Ha) =
D/S Velocity Head corsponding to TWD (Ha) =
Velocity corrsponding TWD
Weir crust level (WCL) = BOTH SHOULD BE ON THE
Left side Bottom Intak level = SAME LEVEL
U/S High flood level (HFL) = WCL+Hd
D/S High flood level (HFL) = RBL+TWD
U/S Total Energy level (TEL) = U/S HFL + U/S Ha
D/S Total Energy level (TEL) = D/S HFL+D/S Ha
Aflux = U/S TEL -D/S TEL
D/S Aprone Level
D/S End Cill Top level
U/S Cut off level =U/S HFL+U/S Cutoff
D/S Cut off level =D/S HFL+D/S Cutoff
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e 
 M ( )  1 .5
 M ()
e
M  L 
L
F 2v 6
 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e 
 M ( )  1 .5
 M ()
e
M  L 
L
F 2v 6

HT DETERMINATION
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1904.55 m
1904.55
0.55 m From MCD
abi
100 m From topo IF > than flow depth in
0.001 m/m From MCD MC thus the discharge can
1906.00 m From topo be drived, so take
calculated H
1907.95 m Fro TWD
300.000 m From Hyd
0.200 m Assumed
0.150 m Assumed
0.150 m Assumed
0.1 m
3.399 m 3.40
VALUE UNIT REMARK
1907.15 1907.18
1906.400 m abi: RS MC
Minimum driving head for
2.60 m Select the larger value
full supply discharge should
be > 0.15m
0.75 m 0.75
0.20 m
FICIENT DETERMINATION
om different angles.Some of these are construction materials
terials during flood time, Considering the foundation the weir is selected to be
nforced concrete. In this project,there are different size of stones along the river
VALUE UNIT REMARK

2.2 - Pier condit
40 m Square nosed
2 Rounded nosed
0.8 Pointed nose
0.01 from tabel Abutment con
0.2 from tabel Square abutments with head wall at
2.60 Rounded abutments with head wall a
300.0 Rounded abutmen
2.6 m
VALUE UNIT REMARK
Hd) and submergence need to be checked whether a correction factor needs to be
2.265 m
2.266 KIYA:
m
If < 1.33 it is a low spill
way, so the effect of depth
of approach on discharge
cofficient is not negligibel
and c=0.73
KIYA:
If < 1.33 it is a low spill
Hd (Goal seek) way, so the effect of depth
2.14 mapproach on discharge
of D/S TEL =
cofficient is not negligibel
2.14
and c=0.73
1.21 m
2.15566416679408
2.243
39.00 m 0.128
2.335 m 2.222
38.97 m 1.052
2.336 m 1.08372694581909
38.97 m KIYA:
If it is very small it have
not any impact so neglect
KIYA:
1.499 m/s (Hd+d)/He = (He+h)/He >
1.7 for no submergenc i.e
0.115 m the "Cd" is not affected by OGL=
tell water condition
2.1 ca/cd=1 neglible No Effect on Cd
abi:
0.7 if>0.4 submergencedoes
not affect C and C=cd
K FOR AFLUX
1909.28 m
1909.40 m
1907.95 m
KIYA:
For good rocky foundation
0.271 m the aflux can be up to 1.2,
usually it should be 1"see
1908.22 m
garg
1.3 m
LE DETERMINATION
VALUE UNIT REMARK Values of K & n based
U/s Slope
2 - Vertical
1.85 - 1:3 (H:V)
2.340 m 2:3 (H:V)
4.120 m 3:3 (H:V)
1
1.2500
VALUE UNIT REMARK
0.666666666666667
1.250
1.250
1.250
1.250 0.553333333333333
3.33 0.047
2.253 0.0374383015466735
1.34 0 0.67 1.34

0.42 0 0.12 0.42
-0.42 0 -0.12 -0.42
27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.4315Hd0.375(X+0.27Hd)0.625
-0.6318 ………………………….
0.29484
-0.6318 -0.6318 -10.6318 -10.6318

0.295 2.6 2.6 4.25
-0.295 -2.6 -2.6 -4.25
2.340 m
3.05 m
0.999570478767746
8.05600604911054
KIYA:
IC JUMP DETERMINATION U.S.B.R Type-1,having
VALUE UNIT REMARK Chute blocks and end
sill,LSB = (4.3-6)Y2
1904.550 m Comment USBR & In
2.60 Type of jump
U.S.B.R Type-1,having
Chute blocks and end
1907.150 undular
3.399 m weak
300.000 m oscillating
38.97 m steady
1904.550 m strong
2.336 m
7.698 m3/s/m
0.115 m
2.14 m 2.222
OUT PUT
Trial-2 Assuming the depth of appron is lowerd by D1 = -0.3 KIYA:
Coonsider ecomomy &
Applying Bernoulli's Equation b/n u/s and at the toe of spillway Natural water way lower
H+He = D/SRBL-0.3+Y1+ (V12/2g) the apron by this value
5.23327855988926 D/S RBL-0.3+Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g)

GOAL SEEK
Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g) = 5.533
Y1 0.7987
solve by goal seek 5.533
Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

V1 = 9.638
Fr1 = 3.4
Ha1 = 4.7341
TWD from Y1/Y2 = 1/2*(-1+√(1+8F12) TWD=
3.399 Y2 = 3.51
V2 = 2.193
aaa:
If d = d2-d3 = 0.00m OK! For Ha2 = 0.2451
0<=d<=0.40m NO NEED of
depressing the downstream stilling Head loss (HL) = (Y2-Y1)3/(4Y1Y2) 1.8
basin level by depth d Difference B/n Y2 AND TWD i.e (Y2-TWD)= 0.1107
KIYA:
the position of the jump
is estimated using blench
curve method
aaa:
the back water curve
L & q Ef2 length is the length
m blench upstram of the weir
1 refer SEE THE REMARK where the flow depth is
-553 normal
aaa:
L & q Ef2 length is the length
m blench upstram of the weir
1 refer SEE THE REMARK where the flow depth is
-553 normal
5.3. Back water curve length(BL)

Back water length =Y=0= (Xs-2∆o)2 /4∆o
TWD 3.399
KIYA: Hd 2.14
Since the foundation is
rock WEIR HEIGHT (H) = 2.6
river slope 0.0087
∆o 1.33534402941500
X= 302.95 0
Y 0.000 1.335
1,909.0
Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)

1,908.0
VALUE REMARK 1,907.0

Case-2
1,906.0
1907.147
1904.550 D/S river bed lowered by 1,905.0
2.16
1,904.0
38.97
2.60 1,903.0
2.34
3.40 1,902.0
0 1
OUT PUT
ha=v2/(2*g)
q=Q/L(m3/s/m) R=1.35*(q2/2)(1/3) (m) v=q/R (m/s)
(m)
0 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.11 0.30 0.37 0.01
0.49 0.81 0.61 0.02
1.24 1.50 0.82 0.03
2.30 2.27 1.01 0.05
3.72 3.13 1.19 0.07
6.10 4.35 1.40 0.10
7.70 5.08 1.52 0.12
8.10 5.25 1.54 0.12
11.35 6.58 1.73 0.15
14.41 7.71 1.87 0.18
Goal Seek
Ef1=y1+q^2/(2gy1^2) F1=(q2/(g*y1^3))^0.5 Y1 (m) V1=q/y1 (m/s)
0.000 0.000 0
2.734 19.041 0.015 7.304
2.971 9.431 0.065 7.550
3.288 6.297 0.158 7.837
3.641 4.868 0.283 8.116
4.035 4.029 0.443 8.395
4.598 3.344 0.698 8.748
4.933 3.075 0.861 8.938
5.014 3.020 0.902 8.982
5.624 2.685 1.222 9.294
6.146 2.477 1.511 9.536
G BASIN DESIGN
VALUE KIYA:VALUE REMARK
3.075 Fr=2.5-4 ocillating jump is formed. KIYA: Case
8.938 It has energy dissipation 20%- USBR Recomendetion
1
3.4 40% not stable 1. 1 <TWD/Y2 < 1.1 =horizontal
2
appron
0.9 2. TWD > 1.1 Slopping apron
3.339
VALUE REMARK 3
1.0 Horizontal depresed apron
3.339 minimum
4
Type -I
5
4.000 m read from graph
0.000 m
13 m
15 m take max value
0.300 KIYA: m
0.0 consideringm the incoming
bolder take nominial height
0.000 m
of end cill =0.5m read from graph
0.000 m
0.0 m
considering the incoming
bolder take nominial height
of end cill =0.5m
0.0 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
0.000 m
m
OUS AND PERVIOUS APRON

VALUE REMARK
0.40 NB. Depends on Bed material for d50(average particle size) (Geology report) or from standard refre
7.313 m3/s/m
3.399 m
2.597 m
1904.550 m
1909.285 m
1907.949 m
1904.550 m
1.11 m
4.908 m
7.362 m
6.135 m
1903.150 m
1.400 1.65 so provide 2.5 cutoff depth
0.500
1900.588 m
3.962 4 so provide 2m cutoff depth
1902.900 m
1900.550 m
13 Not Economica
10.000 m
7.362
2.00 take 2meter for down stream
FINAL OUT PUT

3.339
0
1904.55
1904.55 U/S TEL = 1909.40
2.60 U/S HFL = 1909.28
3.40 He =Hd= 2.336
2.336 WCL = 1907.15
2.138
0.11
0.90 LS BIL = 1906.40
4.21 H=
1907.15
1906.40 RBL = 1904.550 10.0
1909.28 1.65
1907.95 0.90
1909.40 1902.900
1908.85
1.34
1904.55 0.50 10.0
1904.85
1902.90
1900.850
abi
IF > than flow depth in
MC thus the discharge can
be drived, so take
calculated H
0.578403755868545
1.850
1906.947
1.850
Pier condition Kp
Square nosed pier 0.02
Rounded nosed piers 0.01
Pointed nose piers 0
Abutment condition Ka
Square abutments with head wall at 90o to the direction of flow 0.2
Rounded abutments with head wall at 90o to the direction of flow 0.1
Rounded abutments at 45o 0
1.534
U/S HFL = 1909.483
WCL = 1907.147
H= 2.597
Y1 = #VALUE!
1904.550
Values of K & n based on U/S shape

K n
2 1.85
1.936 1.836
1.936 1.81
1.873 1.776
2.01 2.68 3.33
0.88 1.5 2.25
-0.88 -1.5 -2.25
51.3138199868377
-10.1318 -10.1318 0
4.25 2.85 2.85
-4.25 -2.85 -2.85
KIYA:
Comment USBR & Indian S.basin
froud no Energy dissipation KIYA:
INDIAN:-Type-
1,Fr<4.5,Basin with chut
and ,baffle blocks & a
dentated sill
KIYA:
1-1.7 5% INDIAN:-Type-
1,Fr<4.5,Basin with chut
1.7- 2.5 20% and ,baffle
KIYA: blocks & a
2.5 - 4.5 20-40% dentated sill
INDIAN:-Type-3 & 4,
4.5 - 9.0 45-70% A vertical and
horizontal appron
>9 70-85% having end sill.
KIYA:
KIYA: INDIAN:-Type-
INDIAN:-Type-2 Fr >
KIYA: 1,Fr>4.5,Basin with chut
4.5 & V > 15m/s,no basin USBR:-(V<15m/s)U.S.B.R and ,baffle blocks & a
KIYA: Type-2,having Chute dentated sill
blocks
USBR:-(V>15m/
blocks,baffle blocks and
s)U.S.B.R end
Type-
sill
3,having Chute
blocks, and end sill no
KIYA: KIYA:
need of Baffel blocks
Coonsider ecomomy &
USBR:-Only horizontal
Natural water way lower
appron,LSB = 5Y2
the apron by this value
aaa:
length is the length
upstram of the weir
where the flow depth is
normal
aaa:
length is the length
upstram of the weir
where the flow depth is
normal
1,909.0 TWD and Post jump comparasion

Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)
1,908.0 Tail water depth (m) Jhfl 1907.949
1,907.0
1,906.0
1,905.0
1,904.0
1,903.0
1,902.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Discharge, Q (m3/s)
U/s HFL=RBL+H+(He-ha ) U/s TEL=U/sHFL+ha

Tail water depth (m)
(m) (m)
1907.147 1907.147 0.000

1907.277 1907.284 0.500
1907.502 1907.521 1.000
1907.803 1907.838 1.500
1908.139 1908.191 2.000
1908.513 1908.585 2.500
1909.048 1909.148 3.000
1909.366 1909.483 3.399
1909.443 1909.564 3.500
1910.022 1910.174 4.000
1910.518 1910.696 4.500
Y2=y1/2*((1+8f1^2)^.5-1) (m) v2=q/y2 (m/s) ha=v2/(2*g) (m)
0
0.396 0.276 0.004
0.839 0.588 0.018
1.329 0.931 0.044
1.814 1.268 0.082
2.310 1.608 0.132
2.969 2.056 0.215
3.339 2.305 0.271
3.427 2.364 0.285
4.067 2.791 0.397
4.591 3.139 0.502
Condition Recommended basin

ecomendetionTWD = Y2 horizontal apron
WD/Y2 < 1.1 =horizontal
TWD < Y2 1. A depressed horizontal aprone having sill
> 1.1 Slopping apron 2.Stillining basin having sill or baffle blocks
3. rock foundation Ski Jump bucket
TWD > Y2 1. A Vertical slopping apron
2. Lowering river bed,stilling basin
3. A roller bucket
TWD < Y2(at low Q) 1. A vertical slopping apron
2. Vertical apron with baffel block Sill for V<15m/s
TWD > Y2(at low Q) 1.A vertical and horizontal apron having sill
) (Geology report) or from standard refrence mat'l
UT PUT
2.60
Y2 =
4.2468
14.7
D/S TWL= 1907.949
D/S HFL = 1907.949
Y2 = 3.34 TWD= 3.399
SB Level = 1904.550
0.7
6.1
0.28
1.2488212259257 0.35
3.615 3.615 20.115 20.615 21.115 21.115
2.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.3 6.6
-2.6 -2.6 -2.6 -2.3 -2.3 -6.6
0 2.85
2.1234 4.25
3 4.8279598757
51.3401917459099
128.65980825409 5.1234
4.7382
18.4936 14.87
3.1851 4.2468 5.631165
2.1234 6.3702 6.3702 12.001364999 12.0013649994 16.957365

4.25 4.25 3.85 3.85 3.65 3.65
-4.25 -4.25 -3.85 -3.85 -3.65 -3.65
0 #DIV/0! 8.4936
ype-
sin with chut
blocks & a
ype-
sin with chut
blocks & a
N:-Type-3 & 4,
al and
tal appron
end sill.
e-
n with chut
ocks & a
horizontal
= 5Y2
parasion
Jhfl 1907.949
1904.550
5 6 7 8 9
D/s HFL=RBL+TWD D/S TEL=D/S

(m) HFL+ha (m)
1904.550 1904.55 0.000

1905.050 1905.06 0.104
1905.550 1905.57 0.161
1906.050 1906.08 0.171
1906.550 1906.60 0.186
1907.050 1907.12 0.190
1907.550 1907.65 0.031
1907.949 1908.07 0.060
1908.050 1908.17 0.073
1908.550 1908.70 -0.067
1909.050 1909.23 -0.091
Jhfl
1904.550
1904.946
1905.389
1905.879
1906.364
1906.860
1907.519
1907.889
1907.977
1908.617
1909.141
ed basin
apron
sill
ocks
or V<15m/s
sill
D/S TEL = 1908.85
D/S HFL= 1907.95
TWD = 3.40
3.3393 1904.85
RBL = 1904.55
1904.6
4
1900.85
14.9 0.50
0
-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
0
-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2
-1
-2
-3
20.615 20.615 9 9 8.6

6.6 3.45
-4
-6.6 -3.45 -2.3 -4.8 -4.8
-5
-6
-7
16.957365 20.615 20.615 20.615 22.615 13 15 14.2448

3.45 3.45 3.4 3.4 3.4
-3.45 -3.45 -3.4 -3.4 -3.4 0 0 21.140295
Lj
1.01646
0
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
SIN 25 0.4226183
COS 25 0.9063078
Tan 29 0.5543091
Tan 23 0.4244748
Tan 25 0.4663077
INPUT OUT PUT

SIN 1 90
COS 1 0
TAN 1 45
TED #REF!
TETA 16.5
Y2 Y1 Y1/Y2 f1 Yt
0.1372996 0.3826089 2.7866722 4.5 3.307
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
0 0 0
0 0 -0.32 0.021 -0.048 20.615 1.85 -3.45
0.67 -0.12 -0.63 0.1323 -0.295 16.95736 2.1 -3.45
1.34 -0.42 -0.63 1.3 -2.6 16.95736 2.1 -3.65
2.01 -0.88 -10.63 1.3 -2.6 12.00136 2.3 -3.65
2.68 -1.5 -10.63 2.55 -4.25 12.00136 2.3 -3.85
3.33 -2.25 -10.13 2.55 -4.25 6.3702 2.6 -3.85
3.62 -2.6 -10.13 1.55 -2.85 6.3702 2.6 -4.25
3.62 -2.6 0.00 1.55 -2.85 2.1234 1.55 -4.25
20.12 -2.6 2.12 1.55 -4.25 0 1.55 -2.85
20.62 -2.3 6.37 2.6 -4.25 -10.1318 1.55 -2.85
21.12 -2.3 6.37 2.6 -3.85 -10.1318 2.55 -4.25
21.12 -6.6 12.00 2.3 -3.85 -10.6318 2.55 -4.25
20.62 -6.6 12.00 2.3 -3.65 -10.6318 1.3 -2.6
20.62 -3.45 16.96 2.1 -3.65 -0.6318 1.3 -2.6
9 -2.1 16.96 2.1 -3.45 -0.6318 0.1323 -0.295
5 -2.1 20.62 1.85 -3.45 -0.3159 0.021402 -0.048
5 -2.3
3.5 -2.3
3.5 -2.6
1.5 -2.6
0.25 -1.55
0 -1.55
-2.78 -1.55
-2.78 -2.55
-3.28 -2.55
-3.28 -1.3
-0.28 -1.3
-0.28 -0.13
-0.14 -0.02
0,0 0,0
0 2169.083 0,0 -0.3159,-0.048 -0.6318,-2.6
1 2168.775 0.67,-0.12 -0.6318,-0.295 -0.6318,-0.295
1.53 2168.613 1.34,-0.42 -0.6318,-2.6 -0.3159,-0.048
2 2168.428 2.01,-0.88 -10.6318,-2.6 0,0
2.94 2168.063 2.68,-1.5 -10.6318,-4.25 0.67,-0.12
3 2168.038 3.33,-2.25 -10.1318,-4.25 1.34,-0.42
3.88 2167.69 3.62,-2.6 -10.1318,-2.85 2.01,-0.88
4 2167.662 3.62,-2.6 0,-2.85 2.68,-1.5
5 2167.423 20.12,-2.6 2.1234,-4.25
5.2 2167.375 20.62,-2.3 6.3702,-4.25
5.79 2167.47 21.12,-2.3 6.3702,-3.85
6 2167.456 21.12,-6.6 12.0013649993587,-3.85
7 2167.388 20.62,-6.6 12.0013649993587,-3.65
8 2167.32 20.62,-3.45 16.9573649993587,-3.65
8.06 2167.316 8.06,2167.316 16.9573649993587,-3.45
9 2167.01 9,2167.01 20.615,-3.45
9.99 2166.689 9.99,2166.689
10 2166.696 10,2166.696
11 2167.127 11,2167.127
12 2167.558 12,2167.558
13 2167.99 13,2167.99
14 2168.421 14,2168.421
15 2168.853 15,2168.853
16 2169.284 16,2169.284
17 2169.715 17,2169.715
17.2 2169.811 17.2,2169.811
-0.28,-1.3
-0.28,-0.13
-0.14,
7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS & PERVIO
7.1. Design of impervious apron length.
Under seepage through the structure is checked for two cases:
CASE-1 Under a no flow condition where the head difference is the difference between the weirs
downstream bed level.
CASE-2
Under a full discharge condition with a hydraulic jump in the stilling basin.
REQUIRED DATA
River bed level U/S
TWL
Depth of flow after jump = Y2
River bed level D/S
Weir crest level
U/S HFL
D/S HFL
Cisterne level
Pre jump water depth =Y1
Weir Bottom width
U/S Cutt off depth (d1)
D/S Cutt off depth (d1)
Tickness of both U/S & D/S Cut off
Creep coefficient for mixture ofcourse grained sand "C" =
River bed form mixture of Boulder & gravel
U/S Aprone length
Tickness of both U/S apron
OUT PUT
CASE-1 Percolation head, HW= crest level- D/S River bed level
CASE-2 Percolation head, HW= (U/S HFL – D/S HFL) =
Total creep length, L = C * Hw
D/S impervious apron L D/S = 2.21*C* √(Hw/10)
D/S Apron length, L1 provided to meet hydraulicjump
Take Maximum of the two apron length (D/S apron length)
U/S impervious apron Length L U/S = L-(Ld/s+B+2Y1+2Y2)
7.2. Design of pervious apron (protection work) length

Protection works are required on the u/s and d/s in order to obviate the possibility of scour hole traveling cl
through the filter. But in Sebat wedel case river bed material is covered with gravel, and boulder that can ac
of 2 m with boulders to protect the weir from direct impact of boulders and downstream after the imperviou
residual energy that may possibly come from high floods with larger return periods.
Bligh's Meth
3.Design of impervious floor thickness
From practical point of view, the u/s apron (impervious floor) mostly covered by river deposit, one thickne
structure, and uplift pressure is also counter balanced by the weight of the standing water. Hence provide n
thickness of 0.25m u/s of the weir
Consider Case-A, The uplift preasure under no flow condition which is determined by t=
4/3*(Hr/G-1) where Hr the residual head remaning at a point
Take unit weight of floor material G =
Percolation head (Hw) =
Percolation head (Hw) =
C
Safty Factor …………….(S.F)
point G Hw
A 2.3 2.60
B 2.3 2.60
C 2.3 2.60
D 2.3 2.60
Consider Case-B, High flood condition with a hydraulic jump forms in the basin under the
maximum flow condition t= 4/3*(Hr/G-1)
point G Hw
A 2.3 1.34
B 2.3 1.34
C 2.3 1.34
D 2.3 1.34
CONCLUSION The concrete thickness to be adopted for the structure is the g
Khosla's Met
4. Check for the exit gradient
REQUIRED DATA
B =Total Length of impervious apron =
d2 =D/S cut off
Hw =
α= b/d =
From khosla's pressure curve where λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5
Hence, GE = Hw/d2*(1/(π*√λ)) =
The maximum permissible exit gradient for mixture of gravel, boulder, cobble and sand is 0.25 which is gr
the structure is safe against piping.
5.Checking the thickness of the impervious floor by khosla’s
· Pressure at key points of u/s cutoff

1.pressure calculation
let the floor thickness in the upstreame be 0.50m and near the down stream cutoff be 0.7
Assumed u/s floor thickness = =
A.up stream sheet pile =
let the thickness of sheet pile =
d1 = =
b= =
α= b/d = =
From khosla's pressure curve where =
λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5 i.e
λ =
(λ -2)/λ =
(λ -1 )/λ =
φE = (1/π)cos--1(λ-2)/λ =
φD = (1/π)cos--1(λ-1)/λ =
φC1 = 100 - φE =
φD1 = 100 - φD =
φE1 =
φD1 - φC1 =
A Correction for floor thickness =
where 0.5 is the nominal thickness of u/s apron.
Percolation head, HW= crest level- D/S River bed level
B correction for interference of d/s cutoff on фC1 = C = 19√D/b'*(d+D)/b
D = depth of pile whose influence has to be Determined on the adjacent pile depth d. =
b’=distance b/n two piles =
b=Total floor length ~b’ =
d= depth of pile on which the effects of another Depth (D) is to be calculated
for concrte take G =
C=
Corrected φC1 =
The residual pressure head at C1=Hw* Corrected фC1 =
Floor Thickness at Point C1 =(t) =corrected C1/(G-1) =
From practical point of view, the u/s apron (impervious floor) mostly covered by river deposit, thickness of
and since uplift pressure is counter balanced by the weight of the standing water nominal thickness of 0.5m
Pressure at key points of D/s cutoff

1.pressure calculation
let the floor thickness in the upstreame be 0.50m and near the down stream cutoff be 0.7
Assumed u/s floor thickness = =
A.down stream sheet pile =
let the thickness of sheet pile =
d2 = =
b= =
α= b/d = =
From khosla's pressure curve where λ = (1+ sqrt(1+α^2))*0.5 i.e
λ =
(λ -2)/λ =
(λ -1 )/λ =
φE = (1/pi)cos--1(λ-2)/λ =
φD = (1/pi)cos--1(λ-1)/λ =
φC =
φE - Φd =
A Correction for floor thickness =

B correction for interference of d/s cutoff on фE = C = 19√D/b'*(d+D)/b
D = depth of pile whose influence has to be Determined on the adjacent pile depth d. =
b’=distance b/n two piles =
b=Total floor length ~b’ =
d= depth of pile on which the effects of another Depth (D) is to be calculated
for concrte take G =
C=
Corrected φE =
The residual pressure head at E =Hw* Corrected фE =
Floor Thickness at Point E =(t) =corrected E/(G-1) =
Thickness for intermediate points A ,B,C & D

By assuming the uplift pressure is usually varying linearly from u/s to the d/s the pressure head (uplift) at in
calculated in below.

Corrected φC1 =
Corrected φE =
The residual pressure head at C1=Hw* Corrected фC1 =
The residual pressure head at E =Hw* Corrected фE =
Specific Gravity of concrete
Location
The residual pressure head (RP) =
Horizontal creep length b/n C1 and E-----(b)
Horizontal creep length--(L)-- b/n (C1 from A & B )&( E from C & D)
The preasure at each location( P ) = (RP-[(RPC1-RPE)/b]*L =
Thickness at each point =P/(G-1)*1.3 (i.e with an extra thickness 30%)
Periviously calculated Thickness at each point (by Blighs)=
TAKE =
QUANTITY
all are in meter un
A U/S CUT-OFF WIDTH
1 EXCAVATION
KIYA:
1.1. WEATHERED ROCK EXC 40.0 from drawin
1.2. HARD ROCK EXC 40.0
1.3. Aluvial deposit 40.0
2 STONE WORK
2.1. CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) 40.0
3.3. FORM WORK 60
A U/S APRONE
1 EXCAVATION
1.1. WEATHERED ROCK EXC 40.0
2 STONE WORK
3.3. FORM WORK 40.0
B D/S CUT-OFF
4 EXCAVATION
5 STONE WORK
6.3. FORM WORK 40.0
B D/S APRONE
4 EXCAVATION KIYA:
From Drawing
From Drawing
5 STONE WORK
6 CAPPING
6.1. C-20 CONCRETE 40.0
6.2. ø 12 RAINFORCMENT BAR -
U/S CUT-OFF
Data length width
Discription 40.00 1.65
No of bar dis = (length -2*covery)/spacing b/n bar
No of bar log = (width-2* covery)/spacng b/n bar
length of bar dis = Width - twosides of covery
length of bar long = Length -two sides of coveryb
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 10 252.77
lon 12 279.44
U/S APRONE
Data length width
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 12 1597.12
lon 10 1636.72
D/S CUT-OFF
Data length width
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 14 631.12
lon 14 678.64
D/S APRONE
Data length width
Total lenth---
Ǿ (m)
dis 12 2914.16
lon 10 2885.12
45
1125
1250
299
260
US & PERVIOUS APRON LENGTH
fference between the weirs crest level and the
stilling basin.
VALUE Unit REMARK
1904.55 m
3.40 m
3.34 m
1904.55 m
1907.15 m
1909.285 m Safe Exit Gradient by "Bligh's"
1907.95 m Valueb Safe Exit
1904.55 m Soil Type of C Gradient
0.799 m Fine sand 15 0.14
4.247 m Course grained Sand 12 0.17
1.650 m Sand & Boulder 9 0.25
4.000 m
0.500 m
15.000 m
10.000 m
0.25 m
VALUE Unit REMARK
2.60 m
1.34 m
38.96 m KIYA:
Since the foundation is not
16.89 m rock provide3m apron
14.9 m length.
16.9 m
6.51 10
ty of scour hole traveling close to the impervious floor of the weir and to relive any residual uplift pressure
avel, and boulder that can act as protection work, so it is important to fill the upstream of weir for a length
wnstream after the impervious apron .The river bed has large cobble which is adequate to dissipate any
ods.
gh's Methods
y river deposit, one thickness cover of the
ing water. Hence provide nominal
where
Hr =Hw-Hw/L*(Lp) KIYA:
In Bligh's method, the apron length is
2.3 where Hr = Residual head safe against piping & seepage if L<Lc
2.60 and therefore, the apron provided is
safe against piping & seepage, if Lc is
1.34 far greater than L
15
1.3
L Lp Hr Lc t
38.96 15.17 1.585 42.44 Err:508 1.63
38.96 20.805 1.210 42.44 Err:508 1.24
38.96 26.436 0.835 42.44 Err:508 0.86
38.96 32.067 0.459 42.44 Err:508 0.47
KIYA:
Since it didn't Accommodate
the Jump length take as the
Jump length = 15
L Lp Hr Lc t
38.96 15.17 0.815 40.41 Err:508 0.84
38.96 20.805 0.622 42.44 Err:508 0.64
38.96 26.436 0.429 42.44 Err:508 0.44 KIYA:
38.96 32.067 0.236 42.44 Err:508 0.24 In Bligh's method, the apron length is
safe against piping & seepage if L<Lc
and therefore, the apron provided is
safe against piping & seepage, if Lc is
far greater than L
ted for the structure is the greater of the two cases. Hence adopt the First case.
sla's Methods KIYA:

U/S AND D/S APRON
LENGTH PLUS WEIR
BOTTOM WIDTH
VALUE Unit REMARK

31.64 m from drawing
4 m
2.597 m
7.9100737495
4.9865168607
0.09 0.17 Safe
and sand is 0.25 which is greater than the GE=0.14 then
e down stream cutoff be 0.70m.

0.25 m
0.500 m
1.65 m
31.640294998 m
19.175936362
10.100996503 %
0.8019997334 %
0.9009998667 %
20.376950342 %
14.283439952 %
79.623049658 %
85.716560048 %
100 %
6.0935103894 %
0.9232591499 %(+ve)
2.597 m
4 m
31.640294998 m
31.640294998 m
1.65 m
2.3
1.2063442499 %(+ve)
81.752653058 %
2.1231163999
1.6331664615 Take the min 0.25
y river deposit, thickness of the structure,
r nominal thickness of 0.5m is provided.
e down stream cutoff be 0.70m.

0.5 m
0.500 m
4 m
31.640294998 m
7.9100737495
4.4865168607
0.5542198855
0.7771099427
31.301667096 %
21.668488427 %
0 %
9.6331786686 %
1.2041473336 %(-ve)
2.597
1.65
31.640294998
31.640294998
2
2.3
0.5005271635 %(-ve)
29.596992599 %
0.7686338978
0.5912568445 Take the max 0.59
e pressure head (uplift) at intermediate are
2.597
81.752653058
29.596992599
2.1231163999
0.7686338978
2.3
A B C D
2.1231163999 2.12311639991916 2.1231164 2.1231164
31.64 31.64 31.64 31.64
15.17 20.8045649993587 26.43573 32.066895 -12.67
1.47 1.23 0.99 0.75
1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8
1.63 1.2 0.9 0.47
1.6 1.2 1.0 0.8
QUANTITY
all are in meter unless it is specified
LENGTH DEPTH(avg) W.SPACE AREA VOLUME UNIT
KIYA: KIYA:
0.5 drawing
from 0.5 From0.5drawing20.0 20.0 m3
0.5 1.7 0.5 66.0 66.0 m3
0.5 1.0 0.5 40.0 40.0 m3
0.5 1.65 - 66 33 m3
- 1.65 0.25 228 m2
10 0.25 0.5 30 300 m3

10 0.5 0 0 m3
10 0.5 0.5 20 200 m3
10 0.25 - 10 100 m3
10 0.25 - 20 m2
0.5 2 0.5 80 80 m3
0.5 1 0.5 40 40 m3
0.5 1 0.5 40 40 m3
0.5 2.5 - 100 50 m3

0.5 2.5 - 100 m2
KIYA:
From Drawing
18 0.75 0.5 30 555 m3
18 1.25 0.5 50 925 m3
18 1 0.5 40 740 m3
From Drawing
18 1.3 - 52 936 m3
18 0.25 - 10 180 m3
- - - - 0 kg
Spacing
0.25
= 161 No
= 7 No
= 1.57 m
= 39.92 m
mass of 1 m Over all Quantity ---

length of Ø-- Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
0.6161 155.7344
0.8872 247.9192 403.6536
311.4688111
Spacing
0.25
= 161 No
= 41 No
= 9.92 m
= 39.92 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
0.8872 1416.9649
0.6161 1008.4014 2425.3662
Spacing
0.25
= 161 No
= 17 No
= 3.92 m
= 39.92 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
1.2076 762.1265
1581.6371
1.2076 819.5106 1581.6371
Spacing
0.25
= 73 No
= 161 No
= 39.92 m
= 17.92 m

(Kg/m) barr__(Kg)
0.8872 2585.4428
0.6161 1777.5545
1385
1510
s method, the apron length is
ainst piping & seepage if L<Lc
refore, the apron provided is
ainst piping & seepage, if Lc is
ter than L
16.1
2.60
10
0.799
0.25
1.65 C1 1.63 1.24 0.86
E1 C
D1 B
A
0.5 U/S AL B= D/S Apron Length
4.247 5.631
: 14.247
gh's method, the apron length is
against piping & seepage if L<Lc
herefore, the apron provided is
against piping & seepage, if Lc is
eater than L
Khosla's Methods
Pressure at key points of E1, C1 & D1 of u/s cut off
For 1/a = d/b, d= u/s cut off depth
b= horizontal creep length
for 1/ a and from khoslas curve
ØD = -----------% and ØE = -----------% and ØC1 =100- ØE=--------------%
Hence, ØD1= 100-ØD = ---------------%
ØE1 = 100% since it is located at u/s floor level
*Correction for thickness for ØC1 =Øc1+[(ØD1-ØC1)/d]* t
= ---------------%
Where d= ------m (d/s cut off) and t= 0.5m (u/s apron thickness)
*Correction for interference of d/s cut off for Ø C1,

C= 19 (D/b)1/2 *[(d+D)/b] where D=(d/s cut off), d = (u/s cut off) & b= --------------m
C= -------------% (+)
The correction for ØC1= Correction for thickness for ØC1 +C= -------------%
Pressure at key points E, D and C of d/s cut off

For 1/a = d/b, ØD = --------% & ØE= ------------%
ØC= 0, as it is located at the d/s floor level.
Correction for thickness for ØE= ØE- [(ØE-ØD)/d]*t
Where t=d/s floor thickness, d= d/s cut off
Correction for thickness for ØE =---------- %

Correction for interference of u/s cut off for Ø E,
C= 19 (d /b )1/2 *[(d+D)/b] D= u/s cut off, d= d/s cut off , b= horzt creep
= ------------% ( - )
Hence, total correction for ØE = Correction for thickness for ØE –C = ------------ %
Thickness for intermediate points A & B

If the pressure variation b/n u/s cut off C 1 and d/s cut off E, is assumed to be linear, the residual pressures
floor thickness for points A & B are found as:
Hrc1 = Hmax * ØC1= --------------m, ØC1 = -----------% & Hmax = weir height
At point E, the residual pressure head
HrE = Hmax * ØE = ---------m
Thickness at point A: The uplift pressure at A is given as:

PA= Hrc1- [(Hrc1-HrE )/b] *LA,
Where b= horizontal creep length b/n C1 & E = --------------- m
LA= Horizontal creep length b/n C 1 & point A, LA=--------------- m
Therefore, PA= ---------m
And the thickness at A,
tA= PA/gm-1 where gm = 2.3 t/m3 (spec gravity of masonry)
tA= (PA/ gm-1 )*1.30 ( i.e. with an excreta thickness of 30%)
tA = ---------------------m
But, the assumed thickness at point A was --------m and the thickness obtained by khosla's method is ------
Therefore, the previous thickness -------------------m is safe.
Thickness at B: Uplift pressure at B
PB= Hrc1 – [(Hrc1 - HrE )/b] *LB, Where LB =----------- m, b= -------------- m
= -------------------------m
tB= (PB/ gm-1 )*1.30 ( i.e. with an excreta thickness of 30%)
But the assumed thickness at point B was ---------m and the thickness obtained by khosla's method is ------
and hence the previous assumed thickness, ------------m is safe.
5.17
0.221841
d a den wt/m(KG/m) Meter

6 0.00002826 7850 0.2218 0.2220 0
8 0.00005024 7850 0.3944 0.3947 0
10 0.0000785 7850 0.6162 0.6167 88.08
12 0.00011304 7850 0.8874 0.8880 204.12
14 0.00015386 7850 1.2078 1.2087 #REF!
16 0.00020096 7850 1.5775 1.5787 0
18 0.00025434 7850 1.9966 1.9980 0
20 0.000314 7850 2.4649 2.4667 0
22 0.00037994 7850 2.9825 2.9847 0
24 0.00045216 7850 3.5495 3.5520 0
26 0.00053066 7850 4.1657 4.1687 0

28 0.00061544 7850 4.8312 4.8347 0
30 0.0007065 7850 5.5460 5.5500 0
32 0.00080384 7850 6.3101 6.3147 0
34 0.00090746 7850 7.1236 7.1287 0
36 0.00101736 7850 7.9863 7.992 0
0.47 0.00
D E C
C
4.0
D/S Apron Length
5.631 5.631165
16.9
D
0.5
hods
e residual pressures and
sla's method is ------------m.
sla's method is ------------m

Mass(Kg)
0
0
54.277098
181.1287397
#REF!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
weir height = 2.63

Bottom wer width "B" = 4.25
Apron length -----Ld/s = 16.89
Apron length----- L u/s = 3.00
Cut off thickness 0.50
Over all head work length in cluding aprone & weir = 24.64
Befor Jump depth (d1) = = 0.80
Post Jump depth (Y2) = 3.510
Tail water depth = 3.40
Befor jump velocity head(Hv) = = 4.73
Unit discharge (q) = = 7.698
Vertical angel with which the d/s curved surface = 38.659

φ
make an angel D/S ( vang) = SIN φvag =
Cos φvag =
0.62
0.78
Total wer length "B" = = 4.25
Head over the weir (Hd) = = 2.338
U/S apron length__(Lu) = 10.00
D/S apron length__(Lu) = 17

Constants
Gravitational acceleration (g) = = 9.81
angel of internal friction (φ) = = 35.00
Top width of weir which the water make contact = 1.00
ϒwater = 9.81
ϒmasonary 23
Unit weight of material in KN/m3
ϒsilt 10.84
ϒRCC 25
FORCE FORMULA
1. WATER PREASURE
1. U/S static Pwh1= ϒw*A = 0.5*ϒw*h*h
KIYA
Pwv2=ϒwA= ϒw hd * (h) When
2. D/S Dynamic P’H= [(ϒ w q/g) (2ghv1) 1/2
(1-sin Æ )] + 1/2ϒwd1curve
2
P’v = (ϒwq/g) (2ghv1) 1/2

cos Æ=
WHERE q= Q/L Unit discarge
Is the vertical angle with whi
Æ=
at the point of water level pro
g= acceleration due to gravity =

(2ghv1) 1/2
velocity of flow over curved fa
Hv1= velocity head at d1
2. SILT PREASURE
Psilt=ϒs *h2*(1-sinФ)/(1+sinФ))/2
WHERE ϒs = the unit weight of the silt
h= the height of the silt to be
Æ= angle of internal friction fo
3. Uplift pressure
U1= ϒw*A=gw*d1xB=
U2= ϒw A = 0.5*gw (h+hd) * B
AT THE WEIR TO
1 FOR DYNAMIC CASE
Name of forces Symbol AREA(m2)
C-1 0.69
C-2 0.04
C-3 0.08
1. WEIGHT OF WEIR BODY (Self weight) C-4 0.02
C-5 0.19
C-6 0.22
C-7 0.24
C-8 0.31
M1 0.36
M2 0.11
M3 0.86
M4 0.18
M5 1.58
M6 0.22
M7 2.96
M8 0.40
M9 1.48
M10 2.10
2. Silt pressure
Psilt Psilt
3. Hydrodynamic pressure
1. U/S
Pwh Pwh
Pwv Pwv
2. D/S
P'wh P'wh
P'wv P'wv
4. Uplift pressure
u1 U1
u2 U2
sum
1 Checking for sliding

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e
 M (  )  1 .5
Checking for overturning
2
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v
4 Checking forBearing Capacity

Maximum base pressure ΣV/B*(1+6*e/B)
Minimum base pressure ΣV/B*(1-6*e/B)
2 FOR STATIC CASE
C-1 0.69
C-2 0.04
C-3 0.08
C-5 0.19
C-6 0.22
C-7 0.24
C-8 0.31
M1 0.36
M2 0.11
M3 0.86
M4 0.18
M5 1.58
M6 0.22
M7 2.96
M8 0.40
M9 1.48
M10 2.10
1. Water pressure(U/S)
PH1
2. Silt pressure
Psilt
5. Uplift pressure
U1
sum

  F v
 1 .5
 H F
2 Checking for overturning e

 M (  )  1 .5
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v

9. WEIR CAPPING
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during ove
neccesary. thickness considered in this design case is 20cm and minimum rein forcem
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PM
Assumed thickness(D) = 250

Diameter of bar = 12
Area of steel = = 708.333333333333
Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% where
Where Pmin % = 300N/mm2
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 160
where ast = πD2/4 = 113.04
Considering cover thickness of 50mm, effective depth is = 103.585882352941

equal to (Deff = t-(50-φ/2))
Thus, Provide = φ12 @ C/C 20cm

Hence spacing of reinforcement = 159.58588235294
Actual area of steel= = 678.24
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 678.24 mm2/m i.e > 566.667, Provide reinforcement b
of 300N/mm2.for both Operation slab and breast wall.
The spacing of the reinforcement bar should be less than three times t
N.B which is smaller of the two. Effective depth=143mm Hence the actual s
<450mm<750mm.Hence it is ok.
The spacing @ c/c should be account the diameter of the reinforcemen
larger size of the reinforcement is applied during actual operation. This
N.B
divide wall with reinforcement size of 12mm with C/c spacing of 200 m
for the weir, apron, under sluice and Divide wall and check the design
But from experience this cover thickness is not enough for weir cappin
N.B the rebar is exposed hence cover thickness of 70mm is provided.This c
weir, apron and under sluice. For more check the design drawing.
WEIR CAPPING
10.BAR QUANTIT
Weir body
Data length width Spacing
Discription 8.00 40.00 0.25
mass of 1 m length
Ǿ Total lenth---(m) of Ø--(Kg/m)
dis 12 1317.36 0.8872
lon 10 1275.12 0.6161
Weir body Anchor bar

mass of 1 m length
dis 16 140.8 1.5772
lon 16 0 1.5772
AREA (m2) LENGTH (m)
1 WEIR BODY
1.1. EXCAVATION
1.1.1 CLAY AND ALUVIAL DEPOSIT 10 40
1.1.2 HARD ROCK 2.5 40
1.1.3 WEATHERED ROCK 5 40
1.2. STONE WORK
1.2.1 CYCLOPIAN CONCRETE 10.24 39
1.2.2 Form Work 6.00 38
1.2.3 Lean concrete 0.25 32
1.3 CAPPING
1.3.1 C-20 CONCRETE #REF! 35.11
1.3.2 ø 14 RAINFORCMENT BAR

1.3.3 ø 32 RAINFORCMENT BAR for anchor
DESIGN OF THE WEIR
Unit REMARK
m
m
m
m
m
m 1718.87339
m
-0.9880316241 0.5 0.5 30
-0.4097717986
0.57361160339 2.2360679775 0.6
m
m 1
m
m2/s
KIYA:
Considering the worest
condition i.e the matterials
are saturated and
compacted filled
REMARK
Acts at 1/3 of H
KIYA:
When d/s of the weir is Acts at 1/2 of H
curved,like ogee weir
Acts at 2/3 of d1
Acts at 1/3 of d1
discarge
vertical angle with which the d/s curved surface makes with
oint of water level produced by d 1.
ation due to gravity = 9.81m/s 2

of flow over curved face (momentum principle)
y head at d1
Acts at 1/3 of H
it weight of the silt
ight of the silt to be deposited= weir height
of internal friction for sandy gravel
Acts at 1/2 of H
Acts at 2/3 of B
THE WEIR TOE

OR DYNAMIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Moment at "o"(KN.M)
Lever arm in
m
Vertical Horizontal Resisting Disturbing
17.25 - 4.13 71.16
0.95 - 4.04
3.84 2.335
2.03 - 3.78 7.65
0.44 - 3.29 1.45
4.83 2.62 12.62
5.40 1.95 10.50
6.05 1.75 10.59
7.83 0.53 4.14
8.17 3.48 28.37
2.53 2.73 6.90
19.67 3.14 61.75
4.07 2.05 8.35
36.34 2.81 101.93
5.08 1.37 6.96
68.15 2.56 174.46
9.15 0.62 5.68
34.13 2.21 75.32
48.32 0.75 36.24
-0.91 0.9 -0.799

-63.98 1.7 -105.892
22.94 - 1.5 34.407
-27.84 0.5 -14.827

57.93194400182 0.266243918 15.424
-33.2760498696 2.1234 -70.658

-20.4368061336 1.42 -28.930
307.54 -92.7357835541 677.744 -221.10569202117
2.16 ok!
3.07 ok!
0.64 ok! 0.708
137.7 ok! 300

7.1
FOR STATIC CASE

Magnitude of forces (KN) Lever arm in Moment at "o"(KN.M)
m
17.25 - 4.13 71.16
0.95 - 4.04
3.84 2.335
2.03 - 3.78 7.65
0.44 - 3.29 1.45
4.83 2.62 12.62
5.40 1.95 10.50
6.05 1.75 10.59
7.83 0.53 4.14
8.17 3.48 28.37
2.53 2.73 6.90
19.67 3.14 61.75
4.07 2.05 8.35
36.34 2.81 101.93
5.08 1.37 6.96
68.15 2.56 174.46
9.15 0.62 5.68
34.13 2.21 75.32
48.32 0.75 36.24
-33.850037745 0.9 -29.641349718712
-10.1361442809 0.88 -8.876
-54.721865358 2.83 -154.929

225.66 -43.9861820259 4.5825333333 627.912 -193.445778595608
3.0781162299 ok!
3.2459352562 ok!
0.198064325 ok! 0.7078
68.0 < 350KN/m2

38.3
R CAPPING
der sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
minimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
iven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
mm
mm
mm2
rea in % = 85/fy% where fy steel strength in N/mm 2 , fy= Pmin Pmin %
0.28333333333 0.00283333333333333
160 Take 200
φ12 @ C/C 20cm Dia

<3*De 310.7576470588 mm Ok!
mm2 > 708.333333
ovide reinforcement bars Dia.14mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield strength
s than three times the effective depth or 450 mm,

m Hence the actual spacing199 =
of the reinforcement when Intermediate smaller or

ctual operation. This capping should also apply for
C/c spacing of 200 mm. This capping detail is provided
nd check the design drawing for further information.
ugh for weir capping because after repeated abrasion

m is provided.This capping detail is provided for the
design drawing.
QUANTITY
= 33 No
= 161 No
= 39.92 m
= 7.92 m
Over all Quantity ---

Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
1168.7618
785.6156 1954.3774
= 128 No
= 0 No
= 1.1 m
= 32.00 m
Over all Quantity ---

Total Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
222.0760
0.0000 222.0760
VOL(m3)
400
100
200
399.36
228
8
#REF!
1954.3774
21.2534
C9
C8
M4
P'wv
C7
C6
P'wh
C5
C4 M2
C3
C1 C2
M3
M1
M1
M1
C4 M2
C3
C1 C2
M3
M1
M1
M1
0.896055384571344
51.3401917459099
38.6598082540901
0.75
0.3761
0.7522
0.501466666666667
0.206666666666667
4.04333333333333
3.94
0.103333333333333
4.04333333333333
2.74666666666667
0.706666666666667
0.3875
#REF!
1.128
0.564
1639.2
0.3761
0.7522
0.501466666666667
0.206666666666667
4.04333333333333
3.94
0.103333333333333
4.04333333333333
2.74666666666667
0.706666666666667
Pwv
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M4 M6
P'wv
C7 Pwh Psl
C13
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
8. STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF T
REQUIRED DATA VALUE
weir height = 2.60

Bottom wer width "B" = 4.25
Apron length -----Ld/s = 16.89
Apron length----- L u/s = 10.00
Cut off thickness 0.25
Over all head work length in cluding aprone & weir = 31.39
Befor Jump depth (d1) = = 0.80
Post Jump depth (Y2) = 3.510
Tail water depth = 3.40
Befor jump velocity head(Hv) = = 4.07
Unit discharge (q) = = 7.698
Vertical angel with which the d/s curved surface = 38.659

φ
make an angel D/S ( vang) = SIN φvag =
Cos φvag =
0.62
0.78
Total wer length "B" = = 2.25
Head over the weir (Hd) = = 2.336
U/S apron length__(Lu) = 10.00
D/S apron length__(Lu) = 17

Constants
Gravitational acceleration (g) = = 9.81
angel of internal friction (φ) = = 40.00
Top width of weir which the water make contact = 1.00
ϒwater = 9.81
ϒmasonary 23
Unit weight of material in KN/m3 KIYA:
ϒsilt 10.84 Considering
condition i.e
ϒRCC 25 are saturate
compacted
FORCE FORMULA
1. WATER PREASURE
1. U/S static Pwh1= ϒw*A = 0.5*ϒw*h*h
Pwv2=ϒwA= ϒw hd * (h)
KIYA:
2. D/S Dynamic P’H= [(ϒ w q/g) (2ghv1)1/2 (1-sin Æ )] + 1/2ϒ wd1d/s o
KIYA:
When
2
curved,like
When o
d/s sh
P’v = (ϒwq/g) (2ghv1)1/2 cos Æ= weir toy is c
WHERE q= Q/L Unit discarge Ogee weir
KIYA:
KIYA:
When d/s o
curved,like
When o
d/s sh
weir toy is c
Ogee weir
Is the vertical angle with whi

Æ=
with at the point of water lev
g= acceleration due to gravity =

(2ghv1) 1/2
velocity of flow over curved fa
Hv1= velocity head at d1
2. SILT PREASURE
Psilt=ϒs *h2*(1-sinФ)/(1+sinФ))/2
WHERE ϒs = the unit weight of the silt
h= the height of the silt to be
Æ= angle of internal friction fo
3. Uplift pressure
U1= ϒw*A=gw*d1xB=
U2= ϒw A = 0.5*gw (h+hd) * B
AT THE WEIR TO
1 FOR DYNAMIC CASE
C-1 0.69
C-2 0.04
C-3 0.08
C-5 0.19
C-6 0.22
C-7 0.24
C-8 0.31
M1 0.36
M2 0.11
M3 0.86
M4 0.18
M5 1.58
M6 0.22
M7 2.96
M8 0.40
M9 1.48
M10 2.10
2. Silt pressure
Psilt Psilt
3. Hydrodynamic pressure
1. U/S
Pwh Pwh
Pwv Pwv
2. D/S
P'wh P'wh
P'wv P'wv
4. Uplift pressure
u1 U1
u2 U2
sum

 F v
 1 .5
 H F
e
 M (  )  1 .5
Checking for overturning
2
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6
v

2 FOR STATIC CASE
C-1 0.69
C-2 0.04
C-3 0.08
C-5 0.19
C-6 0.22
C-7 0.24
C-8 0.31
M1 0.36
M2 0.11
M3 0.86
M4 0.18
M5 1.58
M6 0.22
M7 2.96
M8 0.40
M9 1.48
M10 2.10
1. Water pressure(U/S)
PH1
2. Silt pressure
Psilt
5. Uplift pressure
U1
sum

  F v
 1 .5
 H F
2 Checking for overturning e

 M (  )  1 .5
 M ()
3 Tension
e
M  L  L
F 2 6 v

9. WEIR CAPPING
In order to avoid cracking and shearing of the weir, apron and under sluice during over
neccesary. thickness considered in this design case is 20cm and minimum rein forcem
per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PMi
Assumed thickness(D) = 200

Diameter of bar = 14
Area of steel = = 566.666666666667
Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% where
Where Pmin % = fy= 300N/mm2
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 272
where ast = πD2/4 = 153.86
Considering cover thickness of 50mm, effective depth is = 214.517647058824

equal to (Deff = t-(50-φ/2))
Thus, Provide = φ12 @ C/C 20cm

Hence spacing of reinforcement = 271.51764705882
Actual area of steel= = 461.58
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 566.66 mm2/m i.e > 461.58, Provide reinforcement ba
strength of 300N/mm2.for both Operation slab and breast wall.
The spacing of the reinforcement bar should be less than three times t
N.B which is smaller of the two. Effective depth=250mm Hence the actual s
>300mm<750mm.Hence it is ok.
The spacing @ c/c should be account the diameter of the reinforcemen
larger size of the reinforcement is applied during actual operation. This
N.B divide wall with reinforcement size of 14 mm with C/c spacing of 150
provided for the weir, apron, under sluice and Divide wall and check th
information.
But from experience this cover thickness is not enough for weir cappin
N.B abrasion the rebar is exposed hence cover thickness of 70mm is provid
provided for the weir, apron and under sluice. For more check the desi
WEIR CAPPING
10.BAR QUANTITY
Weir body
mass of 1 m length
dis 10 6088.69192698809 0.6161
lon 10 6088.69192698809 0.6161
1 WEIR BODY AREA

1.1 EXCAVATION
1.1.1 CLAY AND ALUVIAL DEPOSIT
1.1.2 HARD ROCK
1.1.3 WEATHERED ROCK
1.2. STONE WORK
CYCLOPIAN CONCRETE
C-20 CONCRETE #REF!
DESIGN OF THE WEIR
Unit REMARK
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m2/s
KIYA:
Considering the worest
condition i.e the matterials
are saturated and
compacted filled
REMARK
Acts at 1/3 of H
Acts at 1/2 of H
KIYA:
KIYA:
When d/s of the weir is Acts at 2/3 of d1
curved,like
When ogee of
d/s shape weirthe
weir toy is curved like Acts at 1/3 of d1
discarge Ogee weir
KIYA:
KIYA:
When d/s of the weir is
curved,like
When ogee of
d/s shape weirthe
weir toy is curved like
Ogee weir
vertical angle with which the d/s curved surface makes

he point of water level produced by d 1.
ation due to gravity = 9.81m/s 2

of flow over curved face (momentum principle)
y head at d1
Acts at 1/3 of H
it weight of the silt
ight of the silt to be deposited= weir height
of internal friction for sandy gravel
Acts at 1/2 of H
Acts at 2/3 of B
THE WEIR TOE

OR DYNAMIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Moment at "o"(KN.M)
Lever arm in
m
17.25 - 4.13 71.16
0.95 - 4.04
3.84 2.335
2.03 - 3.78 7.65
0.44 - 3.29 1.45
4.83 2.62 12.62
5.40 1.95 10.50
6.05 1.75 10.59
7.83 0.53 4.14
8.17 3.48 28.37
2.53 2.73 6.90
19.67 3.14 61.75
4.07 2.05 8.35
36.34 2.81 101.93
5.08 1.37 6.96
68.15 2.56 174.46
9.15 0.62 5.68
34.13 2.21 75.32
48.32 0.75 36.24
-7.95 0.9 -6.881

-62.84 1.6 -103.337
22.92 - 2 45.837
-25.82 0.5 -13.750

53.72506182 0.266243918 14.304
0 0 0.000
0 0.00 0.000
357.02 -96.6118560474 688.054 -123.968053675848
2.40 ok!
5.55 ok!
0.54 ok! 0.708
148.6 ok! 300

-71.3
OR STATIC CASE
Magnitude of forces (KN) Lever arm in Moment at "o"(KN.M)
m
17.25 - 4.13 71.16
0.95 - 4.04
3.84 2.335
2.03 - 3.78 7.65
0.44 - 3.29 1.45
4.83 2.62 12.62
5.40 1.95 10.50
6.05 1.75 10.59
7.83 0.53 4.14
8.17 3.48 28.37
2.53 2.73 6.90
19.67 3.14 61.75
4.07 2.05 8.35
36.34 2.81 101.93
5.08 1.37 6.96
68.15 2.56 174.46
9.15 0.62 5.68
34.13 2.21 75.32
48.32 0.75 36.24
-33.081326145 0.9 -28.6374013328619
-7.94855679272 0.87 -6.881
0 0.00 0.000
280.38 -41.03 1.73 627.91 -35.52
4.10012625 ok!
17.6786109 ok!
0.01056981 ok! 0.7078
67.0 < 350KN/m2

65.0
R CAPPING
r sluice during overflowing and incoming of boulders, proper capping with RCC is
nimum rein forcement area is taken as 0.85% of the strength of steel. area of steel
ven by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
mm
mm
mm2
rea in % = 85/fy% where fy steel strength in N/mm 2 , Pmin Pmin %
0.28333333333 0.00283333333333333
271.517647 Take
φ12 @ C/C 20cm Dia

<3*De 643.5529411765 mm Ok!
mm2 < 566.666667
vide reinforcement bars Dia.14mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield
s than three times the effective depth or 450 mm,

m Hence the actual spacing750 =
of the reinforcement when Intermediate smaller or

ctual operation. This capping should also apply for
C/c spacing of 150 mm. This capping detail is
de wall and check the design drawing for further
ugh for weir capping because after repeated

s of 70mm is provided.This capping detail is
more check the design drawing.
QUANTITY
= 156.55147499 No
= 194.462937106 No
= 38.8925874212 m
= 31.3102949981 m
Total Over all Quantity ---

Weight of (KG) for U/S Cutt-off
barr__(Kg)
3751.3107
3751.3107 7502.6215
Pwv
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M4 M6
P'wv
C7 Pwh Psl
C13
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
C11 C12
C10
C9 M8
M7
C8
M4 M6
P'wv
C7 Pwh Psl
C13
C6
P'wh
C5 M5
C4 M2
C3 C14
C1 C2
M3
C15
M1
M1
M1
0.3761
0.7522
0.501466666666667
0.206666666666667
4.04333333333333
3.94
0.103333333333333
4.04333333333333
2.74666666666667
0.706666666666667
0.3761
0.7522
0.501466666666667
0.206666666666667
4.04333333333333
3.94
0.103333333333333
4.04333333333333
2.74666666666667
0.706666666666667
Retaining walls
DATA
weir wall height = 2.63
The head over the weir = h 2.34
seqent depth D2 3.34
U/s river bed = 1904.55
Depth of depresion 0.30
D/S High flood level (D/S HFL) 1907.95
U/S High flood level (U/S HFL) 1909.28
Upstream wing wall

Free board = 0.65 m 400
The height of wall is = 5.62 m 4400
Top width 0.50 m
Bottom width 3.31 m
i.e the top Elevation of the u/s retaining wall is 3.02
= 1910.17 1910.17 m.
min. 0.70
max. 0.94
Therefore, the max footing height 1.44 1
H V TAN
1 2 0.5
Stability Analysis of U/s wing wall
Top width B1= 0.50 m. 1910.17 0.50

Bottom width B= 3.31 m.
H
Height of wall Hs= 5.62 m. Ps2
FoundatioN Thickness t= 1.00 m. V
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m3 5.62 W1 W2
Ys of silt(Fill) gsilt= 17 KN/m 3
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25 KN/m3

Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg. 1904.55 W3
Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33 1903.55
bt =D/2-D 0.50 m bt 2.8085
bh =10-15cm 0.50 m 3.31
Bering capacity of Foundation material

gravel material 300 KN/m2
Forces(KN.m) Lever arm Moment about toe(KN.m)
Item Description Vertical Horizontal
(m.) Resisting
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(W1) 64.60 0.25 16.15
1.2. Self Weight(W2) 181.42 1.44 260.54
1.3. Silt preasure(Ps2) 134.09 2.37 318.11
2. Horizontal force
2.2. Active preasure (Ps1) -44.6968094 1.87
TOTAL 380.10 0.00 0.00 -44.70 594.80
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 7.11 Safe 1.50

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.12 Safe 0.75
III) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 511.11
e
M  L 
L SM/SFv 1.344671936
L/2
F 2 v 6 1.65
e= 0.3096 safe 0.55
IV) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
Max compression stress at the toe = Pmax = 179.39 Safe 300
Tension develop at the heel = P= 50.39 Safe 100
QUANTYTY
1 U/S RETAINING WALL
1.1 REQUIRED DATA
- LEFT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH = 84 M
- RIGHT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 69 M
- WORKING SPACE 1M
1.2 QUANTYTY
ITEM AREA(M2) VOLUME
EXCAVATION 35.126345 2950.6129 M3
BACK FILL 14.254672 2180.9649 M3
MASONARY 13.600422 2080.8646 M3
LEAN CONCRETE 0.43085 65.92005 M3
plastering inerface 859.401
pointing outer face 960.83953
s
m
m.
m.
m
m
m
m
Downstream wing wall

Free board = 0.65 m
The height of the wall is = 4.29 m
Top width 0.50 m
Bottom width 2.22
i.e. the top elevation of the d/s retaining wall is
= 1908.54 1908.54 m
min. 0.54
max. 0.71
Therefore, the max footing height 1.00 1
H
26.565051 1
Stability Analysis of U/s wing wall
Top width B1= 0.50 m. 1908.54

Bottom width B= 2.22 m.
Height of wall Hs= 4.29 m.
FoundatioN Thickness t= 1.00 m.
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m2 4.29
Ps1 Ys of silt gsilt= 17 KN/m 2
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25

Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg. 1904.25
1.00 Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33 1903.25
bh bt =D/2-D 0.50 m bt
3.31 bh =10-15cm 0.15 m
2.67
Bering capacity of Foundation material
gravel material 300 KN/m2
Moment about toe(KN.m) Forces(KN)
Item Description Vertical Horizontal
Overturning
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(W1) 49.33
1.2. Self Weight(W2) 84.63
1.3. Silt preasure(Ps2) 62.55
2. Horizontal force
-83.69 2.2. Active preasure (Ps1) -20.8507862
-83.69 TOTAL 196.51 0.00 0.00 -20.85
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 6.91

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.11
IV) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 176.06
SM/SFv 0.895933333
L/2 1.11
e= 0.2119
V) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
KN/m Max compression stress at the toe = Pmin= 139.58
Tension develop at the heel = Pmax= 37.79
QUANTYTY
1 D/S RETAINING WALL
1.1 REQUIRED DATA
- LEFT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 23
- RIGHT SIDE TOTAL R.WALL LENGTH 23
- WORKING SPACE 1
1.2 QUANTYTY
ITEM AREA VOLUME
EXCAVATION 20.446714 470.27443
BACK FILL 7.5787271 348.62145
3420.8874 MASONARY 7.6175696 350.4082
LEAN CONCRETE 0.2865704 13.182239
plastering inerface 197.30597
pointing outer face 212.50503
V TAN
2.5 0.4 21.801409
0.50
H Ps2
V
W1 W2
Ps1
W3
1.00
1.72 bh
2.22
Lever arm Moment about toe(KN.m)
(m.) Resisting Overturning
0.25 12.33
1.07 90.71
1.64 102.82
1.43 -29.81
205.87 -29.81
Safe 1.50
Safe 0.5
safe 0.37
Safe 300
Safe 300
Divide wall
The divide wall separets the undersluice from the main weir portion and allows a silt free water flow to the head regulator by
pocket.The force components of this strucure is its self weight,silt and water pressures The critical forces are when one side o
other side is free.This critical case is true when water is on both sides of the divide wall and silt is maximum on the undersluice
cantiliver wall consists as shown below.Based on this principle, the analysis is shawn as follow as:
gsub= 16KN/M3
Ym of masonry gm= 23 KN/m2
Ys of silt gsilt= 20 KN/m2
Yco of masonry gRCC= 25 1910.17
Top width of RCC B1= 1.00 m.
Thickness of RCC t= 0.2
Bottom width of masonary B= 2.00 m.
FoundatioN Thickness t= 2.00 m. 5.62
Angle of Repose f1 = 30 Deg.
Ka=(1-sinf)/(1+sinf) K= 0.33
Height of wall H s= 5.62 m. 1904.55
Yw of water gwater= 9.81 KN/m 2
Thickness of divide wall 1 m.
Bering capacity of Foundation material 400 KN/m2
Forces(KN) Lever arm

Item Description Vertical Horizontal (m.)
+ve -ve +ve -ve
1. Vertical force
1.1. Self weight(fV1) 5.00 1
1.2. Self Weight(fV2) 258.38 1.00
1.3. Self Weight(Rcc cap)
2. Horizontal force
2.2. Rock preasure (Fs) 3.744667
-18.72
2.3. Water preasure (Pw) -27.551385 3.744667
TOTAL 263.38 0.00 0.00 -18.72
I) Overturning Stability Fo=SMr/SMo 3.76 Safe

II) Sliding Stability Fss=SH/SV 0.07 Safe
IV) Overstressing Stability ΣM=Mr+Mo 193.27
e 
M 
L

L SM/SFv 0.7337986566
L/2
F v 2 6 1.00
e= 0.2662 safe
V) Bearing Capacity P=SV/B(1+6e/B)
Max compression stress at the toe = Pmax = 236.86 Safe
Tension develop at the heel = P= 26.52 Safe
UNDER SLUICE
Some of the important roles that the under sluice plays are;• It enables the canal to draw silt free water from surfac
• Scour the silt deposited in front of the canal off take (head regulator),• Preserve a clear and defined river channel
Here the under sluice is mainly provided to remove silt deposition and increase the efficiency of water abstracting t
of this under sluice is fixed to be equal to the minimum bed level. But since the river crosection is V shape and the
it should be modified during construction time. but the right side sluice sill level can be equal to the minimum bed
Different literatures show that the size of the under sluice opening is to be designed so as to pass a discharge of 1
base flow which ever greater. However, in this diversion irrigation project considering such criteria is difficult mainl
designer assumed a nominal opening size of one meter by one meter specially giving greater attention for o
installed. The gate should be easy to lift by a single operator. Leaving the complexity of the hydraulic paramete
considered to determine its capacity. To carry out the analysis, pond level case was assumed as the over flowing
proposed for silt scouring during rainy season. Consequently, the opening size of the sluice was checked for its cap
water when the construction is commenced. The Orifice Flow Condition is expected as the stored water upstream o
being squeezed by the breast wall. The discharge passing is computed using the following formula.
LS bottom intake level = 1906.4 m

RS bottom intake level = 1906.4 m
Weir crest level = 1907.15 m
River bed level = 1904.55 m
LS & RS Water depth = 0.35 m
Canal Free board = 0.1 m
LS Canal Cill level = 1.85 m
LS & RS Canal capacity = 0.084 m3/s
Cofficient of discharge Cd = 0.6
Design discharge Qd = 300 m3/s
U/S HFL = 1909.28 m
D/S HFL = 1907.95 m
h (head above center of orifice opening) (L.S) = 1.75 m
Depth of Divid wall = 5.62
Weir height H = 2.60
LS Canal driving head = 0.75
LS Canal depth H = 0.50
Under sluice cill level depth(L.S) = 0.10
Base flow = 0.70 10-
20%Qd
Considered Condition is pond level 30
KIYA:
Capacity of sluice assumed to pass 10% of maximum discharge = 30 m3/s consider to
For one sluce the capacity = = 30 m3/s order to m
KIYA:
consider to
order to m
Assumed Sluice depth d = = 1.5 m
Width of Sluice W = = 1.5 m
Velocity (V) =Cd*√(2gh) = for left side(LS) = 3.51274969 m/s ok!
Critical Velocity (V) =1.5*Cd*√(d) = = 1.10227038 m/s ok!

Q Cd x A 2gh cd x Lef f xdx 2gh
= 7.90368681 m3/s Not ok!
under Sluice cill level Left side = 1904.65 m
Top level of L/S under sluice (TLUS) = = 1906.15 m
Spindel length for Left side = 4.00
Scouring gates structural design
The gate of the under sluice is to be vertical sheet metal of 1.1m x 0.75m for the closure of the o
some extra dimensions for groove insertion. Gross area of sheet metals for the under sluice gate
(allowing 5cm insertion for grooves). The grooves are to be provided on the walls using angle iron
the gate openings. The gate (sheet metals) is provided with stiffening angle irons. A vertical raise
under sluice. These gates simply raised by farmers without spindle. KIYA:
N/cm2
Hydro static preasure(Pa) for left side = 17.14 KN/m2 1.71
Silt preasure(Ps) = 27.00 KN/m2 2.70
Total force 44.14 KN/m2 4.41
Alowabel tensile and bending stress = 135.0 N/mm2 13,500 KIY

Ba
KIYA: of
For lef side Under sluice allowabel tensile & cal
bending stress of the for
steel during wet condition rec
Bending stress in flat = plate in N/mm2 and N/cm2 sta
Where
t=thickness of the sheet metal (cm) b/a
P=Hydrostatic pressure (N/Cm2) 1.4
K=Non-dimensional factor 1.3
a =minor support length which related with K =
For b/A = 1 K= 32.4857 From tabel
Take
Thickness of the steel plate = 0.64 0.4
Take 6 4
Weight of steel plat gate = gsteel *s*a*b, 80.38 kg

spindle Length 3.35 METER
spindle diameter 0.03 METER
Weight of spindle P
  D2
 L   18.58 kg
4
KN N
Total weight 98.96 kg ok! = 2.4866 2486.591
Abera:
If it is greater than 100kg
use two or more sluices
Check
te gate weight, G(KN)=0.667*(B 2*h*H) 0.678 Abera:
Where B=gate span (m) If it is greater than 100kg
h=gate height (m)
H=Head of water over the sill (m)
N.B. In order to protect the gate from large bolderes both intake gate as well as Under sluci gate should be protecte
diameter of bar 22 C/C 20 cm both side
Angel iron to slide the gate

50 50 10 mm
0.05 0.05 0.01 m
BAR QUANTYTY
Discription 3.5571 1 0.2
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/
length of bar dislengh

= log=end to end weir length -
length of bar disbar
= dis. = widht of weir -two sides
Ǿ area lenth volume
dis 12 113.04 3673.1 415207.2
lon 12 113.04 1116 126152.6
to the head regulator by depositing the silt in the undersluice
orces are when one side of the divide is under force while the
ximum on the undersluice side.The divide wall is treated as
1.00
0.2
Fv1
Fv2 Fw
FS
2.00
Moment about toe(KN.m)

Resisting Overturning
5.00
258.38
-70.11 dis
-103.17075303 lon
263.38 -70.11
1.50
0.5
0.33
400
400
R SLUICE
lt free water from surface as much as possible.
d defined river channel approaching the regulator.
y of water abstracting to the main canal through the head regulator from the pocket. The sill level
ction is V shape and the fondation is strong rock left side of the under sluice sill level may vary and
ual to the minimum bed level i.e is 2144.63m
to pass a discharge of 10 to20 % of the peak flood, twice the main canal capacity or five times the
criteria is difficult mainly from economic and operation and maintenance points of view. And the
greater attention for operation and maintenance of the sheet metal gate that will be
the hydraulic parameters of flow through under sluice, ‘Orifice Flow Condition’ had been
med as the over flowing (high flood flow) condition is so complicated though the under sluice
was checked for its capacity to pass at least twice the main canal capacity so as to divert the
tored water upstream of the weir body rushes through the sluice with the top surface of the flow is
ormula.
2.649466
2*MC
Capacity 5* base flow
0.168 3.5 Considered Condition is high flood levell
KIYA: Capacity of sluice assumed to

consider to be easy in pass 10% of maximum discharge = 30
order to move by farmer For one sluce the capacity = = 15
KIYA:
consider to be easy in
order to move by farmer
Assumed Sluice depth d = = 1.5
Width
Velocityof(V)
Sluice W=
=Cd*√(2gh) = for left = 1.5
side(LS) = 4.325934
Critical Velocity (V) =1.5*Cd*√(d)
= = 1.10227
QCd x A 2ghcd xLeff xdx 2gh
= 9.733352
under Sluice cill level Left side = 1904.55
Top level of L/S under sluice (TLUS) = = 1906.05
Spindel length for Left side = 3.31
Scouring gates structural design
the closure of the opening space. Providing

he under sluice gate will be 1.15m x 0.75m
alls using angle iron frames at the two sides of
ons. A vertical raised gate is designed for the
KIYA:
N/cm2
N/cm2 2250 Kg/cm2
N/cm2 4275 Kg/cm2
N/cm2 6525 Kg/cm2
N/cm2 KIYA:
Based on the theory of elasticity
of plate bending stress is
tensile & calculated using the following
tress of the formula as per NBR
ng wet condition recommendations NBR-8883
and N/cm2 standards.
Kg/m3 KN/m3
k density of Steel 7850 78.5
45.06 unit weight of water 1000 9.81
41.42 Unit weight of Masonary 2300 23
Unit waight of Concrete 2400 24
unit waight of silt 1900 18
All.tensile stress 1400 14
CM
mm 2082.271
Kg
Therefore the designed gate is a bit lighter
248.659107 requiring stiffening beams(angel iron).
gate should be protected by Trashi rack using
18.2855 75
5.5 7
3.6731
1.116
no bar total V deinsity mass kg
18 0.00738467 7850 58.0
5 0.00063076 7850 5.0
Total 62.9
125.8
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/n bar 40.95 75
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/spacng 25 7
length of bar dis = lengh log=end to end weir length -twosides of c 8.242
length of bar dis = bar dis. = widht of weir -two sides of coveryb +2 5.052
Ǿ area lenth volume no bar total V deinsity
14 153.86 8242 1268114.12 40 0.051295 7850
14 153.86 5052 777300.72 25 0.019044 7850
Total
ondition is high flood levell
m3/s
m3/s KIYA:
consider to be easy in
KIYA:
m consider to be easy in
m
m/s Not ok!
m/s ok!
m3/s Not ok!

m
m
divide wall found
Spindell divide wall colu
sheet metal
stiffening beam
sheet metal
stiffening beam
mass kg
402.7
149.5
552.2
1104.3
Peak Discharge, Q = 551
%age = 15
QS = Ka B2 D2 *(2*g*(H-h)) 1/2 , Qs = 82.65
Ka= Coefficient of contraction (1.20), 1.2
Hd= 3.55
D2 =P + Hd, U/S water depth, m 1909.285
He= 2.69
H=He+P 3.69
P = weir height, m 1
h=POND HIGHT= 1
H-h= 2.69
B2 =Qs/(Ka*D2*((2*9.81*(H-h))^0.5 2.747 TAKE, 1m
Hence, provide 2 bays of 1.0m width by 1.5 m depth opening of sluice on both sides of the weir, with 2 piers of 1m width. The
the crest level 1653.5

The bed elevation of the sluice bay is 1m lower th 1652.5
head regulator crest level (canal off take level) 1653
divide wall foundation Data length width Spacing

Discription 11 7.4 0.2
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spac 55.5 75
log no of bar = width-two sides cove 37.5 7
= log=end to end weir lengt 11.188
length of bar disbar= dis. = widht of weir -two si 7.588
dis 16 200.96 11188 2248340 55 0.123659 7850
lon 16 200.96 7588 1524884 37 0.056421 7850
Total
For both
BAR QUANTYTY
divide wall column Data length width Spacing
Discription 11 8 0.2
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spac 55.5
log no of bar = width-two sides cove 40.5
length of bar dis
lengh
length of bar dis
bar= dis. = widht of weir -two si 8.188

dis 10 78.5 11080 869780 55 0.047838 7850
lon 16 200.96 8188 1645460 40 0.065818 7850
Total
For both
2 piers of 1m width. Therefore the total width of sluice gate = 2*(1.5+2) = 5 m.
divide wall foundation Data length width Spacing

dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spac 70.5 75
log no of bar = width-two sides cove 15.5 7
length of bar disbar= dis. = widht of weir -two si 3.188
mass kg Ǿ area lenth volume no bar total V
970.7 1241.868 dis 16 200.96 14188 2851220 70 0.199585
442.9 569.1 lon 16 200.96 3188 640660.5 15 0.00961
1413.6 1810.968
2827.2 5236.76
BAR QUANTYTY
divide wall column Data length width Spacing
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spac 70.5
log no of bar = width-two sides cove 40.5
length of bar dis
lengh
length of bar dis
bar= dis. = widht of weir -two si 8.188
mass kg Ǿ area lenth volume no bar total V

375.5 1229.88 dis 10 78.5 14080 1105280 70 0.07737
516.7 663.228 lon 16 200.96 8188 1645460 40 0.065818
892.2
1784.4
deinsity mass kg
7850 1566.7 2000.508
7850 75.4 98.828
Total 1642.2 2099.336
For both 3284.4
3215.16
deinsity mass kg
7850 607.4 1985.28
7850 516.7 663.228
Total 1124.0
For both 2248.1
Head regulator Design
The head regulator is located on both side of the weir body. The intake sill level is fixed based on route alignmen
elevation to command the possible irrigable area. Hence, the intake sill level is fixed (LS MC at 2.35m and RS MC
minimum river bed level at weir axis. The minimum river bed level and intake levels are 2144.63 and (LS MC 2146
2145.64 m.a.s.l. )respectively. The lean flow was measured on January is 214.9 l/sec as per the local peopel the
decreas from this value.but expecting the river flow will increase significantly during the months of September to
Hence, the main canal on the left and the right is designed to serve an area of 55 and 40 hectares of land Conside
of extension with a design discharge of 132l/sec and 96 l/sec respectively at the canal head. The maximum duty
2.4l/s/ha.The flow through the canal head regulator is supposed to be orifice flow, and hence the coefficient of d
the head regulator, Cd=0.6.
River bed level 1904.55

Weir crest level 1907.15
N.B The water level (po
Water depth in the canal(RS) =
assumed equal to the w
Water depth in the canal(LS) = 0.55 level difference, he, betw
Free board 0.20 0.30m. So the discharg
Bottom intake level(inner)( LS)= 1906.40 right is determined as f
Top intake level (inner) LS= 1907.15
Minimum water in the river 1905.05
Ls MC design Discharge 0.084 m3/s
C 0.6
Under sluice sill level 0.10
Driving head (WCL-CBL) 1.50
- LS MC Driving head 0.75 2
3
Q  * Cd * ( 2 * 9.81) * L * H 2
3
H = Driving head -(Total canal depth/2) 0.37
Left Side Intake

Opening Bed width
Head (h) Area 1.00 0.90
H
depth d (m) (b)
B
Q
1.20
0.50 0.00 0 0 0.00 Not Ok
0.50 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.03 Not Ok 1.00
0.50 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.08 Ok
0.80
0.50 0.30 0.15 0.15 0.15 Ok
0.50 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.24 Ok 0.60
0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.33 Ok
0.40
0.50 0.60 0.30 0.30 0.44 Ok
0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.94 Ok 0.20
Right Side Intake 0.2827433388
0.00
0.00 0.10
Take The following Intake dimensions
Bed width Depth H Q(m3/s)
1 Left side Intake dimension 0.70 0.50 0.35 0.94
3 Intake Bed level
Left side 1906.40
4 Top Intake level
Left side 1906.90
5 Driving head
Left side 0.75
Hydro static preasure(Pa) = 3.50 KN/m2 0.04 N/cm2

Silt preasure(Ps) = 6.65 KN/m2 0.66 N/cm2
Total force 10.15 KN/m2 0.70 N/cm2
Alowabel tensile and bending stress = KIYA:
135.0 N/mm2 KIYA:
13,500 N/cm2
KIYA: allowabel tensile & bending N/cm2
Bending stress in flat = stressofofelasticity
the steel during
Based on the theory
plate wet condition in N/mm2
of plate bending stress is
Where calculated usingand
theN/cm2
following
formula
t=thickness of the sheet metal as per NBR
(cm)
recommendations NBR-8883
P=Hydrostatic pressure (N/Cm2)
standards.
K=Non-dimensional factor
a =minor support length which related with K = 1
For b/A = 0.7142857 K = 28.7 From tabel
Thickness of the steel plate = 0.39 0.6 CM

Take 4 6 mm
Weight of steel plat gate 22.61 kg

spindle Length 3.11
spindle diameter 0.05 mm
Weight of spindle   D2
47.91 kg
P  L  
4
Total weight 70.52Abera:
kg ok!
If it is greater than 100kg
N.B. In order to protect the gate from large bolderes both intake gate as well as Under sluci gate should be protected b
_________________using diameter of bar 22 C/C 20 cm both side
Angel iron to slide the gate
40 40 40 mm
0.04 0.04 0.04 m
xed based on route alignment and optimal
(LS MC at 2.35m and RS MC at 1m) above the
are 2144.63 and (LS MC 2146.979 and RS MC
c as per the local peopel the discharge may
g the months of September to November
d 40 hectares of land Considering the possibility
al head. The maximum duty for the locality is
nd hence the coefficient of discharge through
N.B The water level (pond level) of the canal head regulator to the weir side
assumed equal to the weir crest level i.e. 2147.63 masl, and the water
level difference, he, between pond level and center half of intake slot is
0.30m. So the discharge, Qd, through the main canal on the left and the
right is determined as follows by:
3
( 2 * 9.81) * L * H 2
LEFT SIDE INTAKE

1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00
H
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.40 0.40
0.20
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Q
Bed width of intake Stage discharge rating curve for gate opening
Remark
> 0.0.972m3/s
Kg/cm3 KN/m3
density of Steel 7850 78.5
unit weight of water 1000 10
Unit weight of Masonary 2300 23
Unit waight of Concrete 2400 24
350 Kg/cm2 unit waight of silt 1900 19
665 Kg/cm2 All.tensile stress 1400 14
1015 Kg/cm2
:
m2
gate should be protected by

Design of operation slab,Masonary suport slap for canal top and Breast wall
To avoid spilling of water during The occurance of highest flood in to the canal, provision of a wall is provided from
gate top level up to the HFL (i.e. known as breast wall). A vertical raised gate whichi slides over the breast wall-usin
spindle during opening and clousing is designed for the head regulator. operation slab is also provided at the top o
wall for simplicityof gate operation. Breast wall and operation slab are considered to be reinforced wall. Their thickn
simply determined from point of construction rather than the imposed load. the thickness required for the imposed
not less than nominial value 15cm . thickness considered in this design case is 20cm and minimum rein forcement
also used. are of steel per 1 meter width is given by (Asteel =PMin% of steel *W*t)
1. Under sluice Operation slab For the breast wall, the minimum reinforcement area is taken as 0.85% of th
strength of steel.
Assumed thickness(D) = 200 mm
Diameter of bar = 12 mm
Area of steel = = 566.6667 mm2
Where Pmin % = Minimum percentage of steel area in % = 85/fy% Pmin
where fy steel strength in N/mm2 , fy= 300N/mm2 0.2833333333
Speacing(S) = ast/(Asteel *1000) = 199 199 Take
where ast = πD2/4 = 113.04
Considering cover thickness of 50mm,
effective depth is equal to (Deff = t-(50- = 144
φ/2))
Thus, Provide =  12 @ C/C 20cm Dia
199
Hence spacing of reinforcement = <3*De 432 mm Ok!
Actual area of steel= =
678.24 mm2
Therefore the actual provided steel area is 566.66 mm2/m i.e >566.667 , so Provide reinforcement bars
Dia.12mm @ 200mmC/C in both directions.which has yield strength of 300N/mm2.for both Operation
slab and breast wall.
and Breast wall BAR QUANTYTY
1 BREST WALL Data length width
of a wall is provided from the Discription 4 3
over the breast wall-using dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/
also provided at the top of breast
nforced wall. Their thickness is
log no of bar = width-two sides covery/spa
required for the imposed load is
minimum rein forcement area is
length of bar dis = lengh log=end to end weir length -two

length of bar dis = bar dis. = widht of weir -two sides of
ea is taken as 0.85% of the Ǿ area lenth
dis 12 113.04 4116
lon 12 113.04 3116
Pmin %
0.0028333333 BAR QUANTYTY
2 OPERATION SLAB Data length width
Discription 7.4 4
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/


Ǿ area lenth
reinforcement bars dis 12 113.04 7516
for both Operation
lon 12 113.04 4116
BAR QUANTYTY
3 MASONARY SUPPORT Data length width
dis no of bar =length -2*covery/spacing b/
Ǿ area lenth
dis 12 113.04 1096
lon 12 113.04 996
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 20.5 75
= width-two sides covery/spa 15.5 7
=end to end weir length -two 4.116

widht of weir -two sides of 3.116
volume no bar total V deinsity mass kg
465272.64 20 0.009305 7850 73.0 84.378
352232.64 15 0.005283 7850 41.5 48.298
Total 114.5 132.676
For both 229.0
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 37.5
= width-two sides covery/spa 20.5


849608.64 37 0.031436 7850 246.8 281.85
465272.64 20 0.009305 7850 73.0 84.378 498.904

Total 319.8 366.228
For both 639.6
Spacing
0.2
=length -2*covery/spacing b/ 5.4 75
= width-two sides covery/spa 4.9 7
123891.84 5 0.000607 7850 4.8
112587.84 4 0.000495 7850 3.9
Total 8.7
For both 17.3
Head Work ( weir, Under Sluice and offtake/ Out let Structure)
S.NO ITEM OF WORK UNITE QUANTITY UNITE PRICE
1 GENERAL ITEMS
1.1 Allow for mobilization L.S 1 200000
1.2 Allow for demobilization L.S 1 100000
Allow for contraction camp and facilities =4*5m , Living room for construction key
2
personnel, CIS and Internally painted chip wood wall, Masonry floor cement screened and No 2 80000
well ventilated room complete with doors and windows.
1.3
6*6m2, Store constructed from CIS with doors and windows, Masonry floor cement
No 1 126000
screened
1.4 Access Road Maintenance cutting to an average depth of 0.3 m, with 6m width km 1 20000
Allow for diversion of river nd reinstate on completion plus all associated temporary works
1.5 LS 1 120000
necessary to construct the weir
Demollition of old reinforced concrete diversion structure m3 50 5000
1.4 Demollition of damaged retainning wall structure m3 1248 500

sub total
2 Head work Structure
2.1 Weir Body
Clearing of site to remove & cut eculaptouce tree up to 10cm diameter, bushes, grabbing &
removing top soil to a depth of 200 mm .And dispose to the place recommended by the m3 1600.00 11.54
2.1.1 Engineer.
2.1.2 Excavation of ordinary Soil for weir foundation m 3
400.00 163.63
2.1.3 Excavation of Soft formation with avarage for weir foundation m3 114.00 328.00
2.1.4 Cart away excavated material m3 514.00 43.4
2.1.5 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 18 5117.62
m3 318.00 6727.11
2.1.6 Cyclopean concrete (40% C-20,60% GRADED STONE) with (1:2:3 ratio)
Reinforced concrete (Capping)
2.1.7 Concrete C-20 m3 80.00 9,882.20
2.1.8 Reinforcement bar, φ10 Kg 1168.97 157.57
sub total
2.2 U/S & D/S Aprone and Cut off
1 U/S CUT-OFF
Excavation
2.2.1 Ordinry soil excavation m3 40.00 163.63
2.2.2 Soft formation excavation up to cut of level m3 26.00 328.00
2.2.3 Filling and Compaction with selected material m3 33.00 99.39
Reinforced concrete
2.2.4 Concrete C-20 m3 33 9,882.20
2.2.5 Form work m2 132 558.34
sub total
3 D/S CUT-OFF
Excavation
Reinforced concrete
2.2.4 Concrete C-20 m3 80 9,882.20
2.2.5 Form work m2 320 558.34
sub total
2 U/S APRONE
EXCAVATION
m3 2.00 99.39
2.2.8 Filling and Compaction with selected material
Reinforced concrete
2.2.4 Concrete C-20 m3 120.00 9,882.20
2.2.5 Form work m2 16.00 558.34
sub total
4 D/S APRONE
EXCAVATION
Cart away excavated material m3 810.00 43.4
STONE WORK
2.2.19 CYCLOPEAN CONCRTE (40%X60%) m3 954.00 6727.11
CAPPING
2.2.20 C-20 CONCRETE m3 180.00 9,882.20
2.2.21 Reinforcement bar, φ12 kg 2564.46 157.57
sub total
2.3 Divide wall
Cart away excavated material m3 115.00 43.45
2.3.5 Concrete C-20 m3 349.00 9,882.20
2.2.21 Reinforcement bar, φ10 kg 1980.86 157.57
2.3.7 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 8.14 5,117.62
2.4 Under sluice
2.4.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m 3
70 163.63
m3 15 6727.11
2.4.2 Cyclopean concrete (60% C-20,40% GRADED STONE) with (1:2:3 ratio)
2.4.3 Concrete C-20 m3 5 9,882.20
2.4.4 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 125.81 157.57
2.4.5 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 1.10 157.57
2.5 Breast wall
2.5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 4.55 9,882.20
2.6 Operation slab
2.6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 7.00 9,882.20
2.7 Masonary support slab above oftake
2.7.1 Concrete C-20 m3 5 9,882.20
2.7.2 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 120 157.57
sub total
3 Retaining Wall (LEFTand Right D/S)
3.1 U/S Retaining wall
3.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 880.00 163.63
Excavation soft formation m4 1320.00 328.00
3.3 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 400.00 5,117.62
3.4 Masonary(1:3 ratio) m3 1539.20 4,283.59
4.2 Compacted Backfill m3 1320.00 99.39
5.6 Plastering internal face (to the river side) m2 1440.00 413.16
5.7 Pointing external face(to the abutment side) m2 1120.00 321.59
sub total
4 Gabion (Protection)
4.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 42.195 163.63
4.2 Compacted Backfill m3 21.0975 99.39
4.3 Gabion (2x1x1m) m3 176.55 4,027.75
Sub Total
5 GATES (Supply and installation as per the drawing for detail)
Intake gate as per the drawing (the cost shall include metal work, providing to site, fixing,
pcs 1 10000
5.1 painting with untie-rest and accessory, like Aluminum chain provided with Lock)
Under sluice gate as per the drawing (the cost shall include metal work, providing to site,
pcs 2 25000
fixing, painting with untie-rest and accessory, like Aluminum chain provided with Lock)
5.3 Trashi racks No 1 50000

Sub Total
Total Headwork cost (for new design)
Total General Item (For new design)
Gran Total (For new design)
AMOUNT (ETH. BIRR)
200000
100000
160000
126000
20,000.00
120000
250000
624000
1,600,000.00
18467.375
65453.25
37392.1484375
92117.225
2139220.45
790576.181818182
184196.95397064
123788.297842209
3451211.88206853
6545.325
8528.03385416666
3279.8734375
326112.675
27127.958112983
35336.569562203
73700.3721666667
480630.807133519
16363.3125
19680.078125
8945.109375
790576.181818182
65882.183988673
88228.887059768
178667.568888889
1168343.32175551
19635.975
328.001302083333
198.780208333333
1185864.27272727
159124.43628913
221461.1471072
8933.37844444445
1595545.99107846
191450.75625
118080.46875
35780.4375
35190.59765625
6417661.35
1778796.40909091
404085.6143896
280495.80479648
8981045.63363676
26999.465625
16400.0651041667
5963.40625
4996.19596354167
3448888.59318182
312126.845857925
1336570.82559
41657.4561944445
0
11454.31875
100906.625
49411.0113636364
19824.05468875
173.3285125
0
44964.0203409091
127362.23218485
69175.4159090909
50944.89287394
49411.0113636364
18908.565
5736138.32975421
143997.15
432961.71875
2047049.44444444
6593294.032
131194.9375
594948.774193549
360180.333333333
10303626.3902213
6904.499709375
2096.88272265625
711099.952148438
720101.334580469
10000
50000
50,000.00
110000
32,546,643.69
1,600,000.00
34,146,643.69
Bill No.2 Head Work ( weir, Under Sluice and offtake/ Out let Structure)
UNITE AMOUNT
S.NO ITEM OF WORK UNITE QUANTITY PRICE (ETH. BIRR)
1 GENERAL ITEMS
1.1 Allow for mobilization L.S 1
1.2 Allow for demobilization L.S 1
Allow for contraction camp and facilities =4*5m2 ,
Living room for construction key personnel, CIS and
Internally painted chip wood wall, Masonry floor No 1
cement screened and well ventilated room complete
with doors and windows.
1.3
5*5m2, Store constructed from CIS with doors and
No 1
windows, Masonry floor cement screened
Barded wire fence 60*20m and 1.5m high treated
timber post complete with 3m wide gate and a CIS No 1
guard house (1.5*2m)
1.4 Allow for temporary access road to site km 21
1.5 Dewatering of open trenches and excavations, pumps LS 1
1.6 Provision of as built drawings for the project LS 1
sub total
1 Head work Structure
Weir Body ,Cut Off ,U/s and D/s Apron
1.1 Excavation (Loose river bed formation) m3 1111.46
1.2 Excavation (Hard rock) m3 191.995
1.3 Cart away m3 1303.455
1.4 Lean Concrete, C-10 (for beding) m3 88.711
Cyclopean concrete (60% C-20,40% GRADED
1.5 STONE) with (1:2:3 ratio) m3 1396.886
1.6 Reinforced concrete (Capping)
1.6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 207.71
1.6.2 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 28278.6
1.7 Reinforcement bar, φ32 for weir body anchor Kg 94.72
sub total
2 Divide wall and under sluice
Divide wall
2.2 Excavation (Hard rock excavation) m3 2.573
2.3 Cart away m3 5.661
Concrete C-20 capping (only the weir side & the
2.5 rounded surface excluding under sluice side)
2.5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 16.18
2.5.2 Reinforcement bar, φ14 Kg 1104.3
3 Under sluice
3.2 Cart Away m3 48.412
3.4 Concrete C-20 m3 1.0508
3.5 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 125.81
4 Breast wall
4.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.85
4.2 Reinforcement φ12 Kg 60
5 Operation slab
5.1 Concrete C-20 m3 1.02828
6 Masonary support slab above oftake
6.1 Concrete C-20 m3 0.521
sub total
7 Guide Wall (U/S and D/S)
7.2 Cart Away m3
578.04
7.4 Masonary(1:3 ratio) m3 681.57
7.5 Backfill m3 513.88
7.6 Plastering internal face (to the river side) m2
454.127
7.7 Pointing external face(to the abutment side) m2 449.897
sub total
8 Gabion (Protection)
8.2 Backfill m3 21.0975
8.3 Gabion (2x1x1m) m3 176.55
Sub Total
9 GATES (Refer the drawing for detail)
Off take canal gate consists Installation, the gate
No 2
9.1 consists the following parts
6mm thickness sheet metal, 0.7m X 0.7m
40X40X10mm angle iron, 1.68 m length
n12mm bar for anchorage, spindel,stiffening angel
iron
Handle 32mm steel 1m length…etc
Under sluice take canal gate consists Installation,

the gate consists the following parts No 2
9.2
8mm thickness sheet metal, 0.85m X 1.2m
50X50X10mm angle iron, 2.6 m length
12mm bar for anchorage
50mm X 50mm Ax 10mm angle iron Stiffening gate
head and handle.(etc)
9.3 Trashi racks No 2
Grand
TABLE: SUMMARY OF BILL OF QUANTITIES
Bill Read out Total Corrected Total
DESCRIPTION
No Cost (Eth. Birr) cost (Eth. Birr)
1 GENERAL ITEM 3,164,000.00 3,164,000.00
5,452,449.69 5,474,209.69
2 HEAD WORK
4,498,581.60 4,498,581.60
3 IRRIGATION SYSTEM WORK
13,115,031.29 13,136,791.29
Total
1,967,254.69 1,970,518.69
Vat (15%)
15,082,285.98 15,107,309.98
Grand Total
Bill of Quantities of Sebat Wedel Irrigation Project (lot-1)
BILL NO.1
Description
1 General Items Unit Quantity
1.1 Allow for contractors camp facilities of 4x5sq, m. living room No 3
for key personnel, CIS and painted interior chip wood wall;
Floor of masonry with cement screed finish; well ventilated
rooms completed with doors and windows
6*6m2, store constructed from CIS with doors and windows, No 1

Masonry floor cement screened
Fence of barbed wire around compound of 50Lx20W and 1.5m No 1

high; tightly fixed around treated timber posts; complete with
3m wide CIS gates
1.2 Access Road Maintenance cutting to an average depth of 0.3 m, km 5

with 6m width
1.3 Field inspection Road construction cutting to an average depth km 2
of 0.3m, with 2m width on both sides.
1.4 Provision for construction posts for scheme No 1
1.5 As built drawings of the works LS 1
1.6 Allow Mobilization LS 1
1.7 Allow Demobilization LS 1
Sub Total
BILL NO.2
2 Head work (WEIR BODY)
2.1 Earthwork Unit Quantity

2.1.1 Site clearing for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke & others m2 50
2.1.2 Strip 150 mm top soil for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke m2 2380
& others
2.1.3 Excavation of Earth for the weir body, apron, wing wall, dyke m3 5949
and others
2.1.4 Excavation in rock m3 959.43

2.1.5 Compacted backfill at the back of wing wall m3 460
2.2 Structural work
2.2.1 Masonry Work
2.2.1.1 Wet masonry for weir body, under sluice, apron cutoff ,wing m3 3021
wall & others on 75mm blinding layer
2.2.1.1 Plaster the required parts of masonry m2 740

2.2.2 Concrete Work
2.2.2.1 Reinforced concrete for deck slab, box culvert & others m3 57
Steel reinforcement for divide wall, breast wall, deck slab, box
2.2.2.2 culvert & others as per the drawing. Kg 3,580
2.2.2.4 C-20 mass concrete m 3
272
2.3 Miscellaneous Work
2.3.1 Gate (Supply and installation as per the drawing)
Trash rack (diam.12mm )
2.3.2 no 2
2.3.3 8mm thickness Sheet metal gate kg 45
2.3.4 off take gate (0.5m x 0.6m), 8mm thickness sheet no 2
metal with double 60mmx60mmx6m angle iron
grooves on both sides and at the bottom
2.3.5 under sluice (0.55m x 0.90m),8mm thickness sheet no 2

metal with double 60mmx60mmx6m angle iron
grooves on both sides and at the bottom
2.3.6 Allow for diversion of Sebat Wedel and reinstate on completion LS 1

plus all associated temporary works necessary to construct the
weir
Sub Total
BILL NO.3
2 Main Canals
2.2 Channel excavation of common material in open to the lines m3 7,901
and grades as shown in drawing, disposal to spoil pits and
spreading, free haul 500m ,Rehabilitation of canal
2.3 Fill for embankments m3 581.1

2.4 Masonry work M3 3000
2.5 plastering M2 7500
Sub Total
3 OFFTAKE STRUCTURES FROM MC to FC
3.1 Structure Excavation

m3 11.26
3.2 Masonry work m3 14.62
3.3 plastering M2 30
3.4 Gates for turn outs and division boxes
3.3.1 4mm thickness sheet metal with double no 28

60mmx60mmx6m angle iron grooves on both sides
and at the bottom.
sub total
5 DRAIN
5.1 Clear topsoil under embankments as directed, average thickness m2 9,000

150mm.
5.2 Channel excavation of common material in open to the lines m3 750

and grades as shown in drawing, disposal to spoil pits and
spreading, free haul 500m, Rehabilitation of canal.
sub total
ITIES
Reasons for the
Difference difference
-
- 21,760.00 Multiplication error
- 21,760.00
- 3,264.00
- 25,024.00
t (lot-1)
Unit rate Read out price Corrected price Differnce

80,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 -
126,000.00 126,000.00 126,000.00 -
70,000.00 70,000.00 70,000.00 -
450,000.00 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 -
120,000.00 240,000.00 240,000.00 -
45,000.00 45,000.00 45,000.00 -

25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 -
120,000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 -
48,000.00 48,000.00 48,000.00 -
3,164,000.00 3,164,000.00 -
Unit rate Read out price Corrected price Differnce
10.00 500.00 500.00 -
12.00 28,560.00 28,560.00 -
70.60 419,999.40 419,999.40 -
201.25 193,085.29 193,085.29

46.00 21,160.00 21,160.00 -
- -
- -
1,200.00 3,625,200.00 3,625,200.00 -
61.00 45,140.00 45,140.00 -

- -
3,100.00 176,700.00 176,700.00 -
41.00 146,780.00 146,780.00 -

2,380.00 625,600.00 647,360.00 (21,760.00)
- -
- -
4,500.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 -

105.00 4,725.00 4,725.00 -
8,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 -
10,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 -
120,000.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 -
5,452,449.69 5,474,209.69 (21,760.00)

38.00 300,238.00 300,238.00 -
41.00 23,825.10 23,825.10 -

1,200.00 3,600,000.00 3,600,000.00 -
51.00 382,500.00 382,500.00 -
4,306,563.10 4,306,563.10 -
- -
- -
75.00 844.50 844.50 -

1,200.00 17,544.00 17,544.00 -
51.00 1,530.00 1,530.00 -
65,000.00 -
3,200.00 89,600.00 89,600.00
-
109,518.50 109,518.50 -
- -
- -
6.00 54,000.00 54,000.00 -
38.00 28,500.00 28,500.00 -
82,500.00 82,500.00 -
SNNPRGS Irrigation CONSTRUCTION & Schemes Administration Agency
Project Name:- MEGECHA MEDIUM SCALE IRRIGATION PROJECT
BILL NO. 3
Take-Off Sheet No 14
3 Construction of RC Cut off
I U/s Cut off

1 Earth work and Rock excavation 0.00
1.2 Ordinry soil excavation m3 1 40 1 1 40.00
1.3 Soft formation excavation up to cut of level m3 1 40 1 0.65 26
1.4 Filling and Compaction with selected material m3 2 40 0.25 1.65 33
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus

1.5 m3 33.00
material to a distance not exceeding 1km
2 Concrete work
2.2 C-25 concrete m3 1 40 0.5 1.65 33
2.4 Metal sheet form work 2.5 mm thick m2 2 40 1.65 132
Reinf. Φ12mm for main reinforcement

2.5 kg 1 252.77 0.8872 224.26
length=500
2.6 Reinf. Φ10mm for lateral reinforcement l=1500 kg 1 279.44 0.6161 172.16
2.7 Tying wire kg 7.93
II D/S Cut off
1 Earth work and Rock excavation

1.2 Ordinry soil excavation m3 1 40 1 2.5 100.00
1.3 Soft formation excavation up to cut of level m3 1 40 1 1.5 60
Filling and Compaction with selected material m3 2 40 0.25 4.5 90
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus

m3 70.00
material to a distance not exceeding 1km
2 Concrete work
2.2 C-25 concrete m3 1 40 0.5 4 80
2.4 Metal sheet form work 2.5 mm thick m2 2 40 4 320

Reinf. Φ12mm for main reinforcement
2.5 kg 1 631.12 0.8872 559.93
length=500
2.6 Reinf. Φ10mm for lateral reinforcement l=1500 kg 1 678.64 0.6161 418.11
2.7 Tying wire kg 19.56

CONTRACTOR SUPERVISOR
NAME :_____________________ NAME :_________________________
SIGNATURE :_______________ SIGNATURE :____________________
DATE :_____________________ DATE :__________________________
_____
_____
_____
Project Name:- WEIRA DOSHA MEDIUM SCALE IRRIGATION PROJECT
BILL NO. 4
Take-Off Sheet
Measurment
It. No. ITEM Sketch Unit VOLUME Remark
T L W H
4 Protection Works
I U/s Protection apron floor
1.2 Soft formation excavation up to cut of level m3 1 1.00

1.5 Filling and Compaction with selected material m3 1
Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a
1.6 121.00
distance not exceeding 1km
2 Concrete work
2.1 C-25 concrete 0.2

M3 1 40 10 0.25 120.00
10
Providing sheet metal with a thickness of 1mm for M2 2

2.2 40 0.2 16.00
construction joint
2.5 Reinf. Φ12mm for main reinforcement length=4059 KG 1 1597.12 0.88 1405.47
2.6 Reinf. Φ10mm for lateral reinforcement l=3700 KG 1 1636.72 0.617 1009.86
2.7 Tying wire KG 28.11
II D/s Protection apron floor
1 40 18 1.325 954.00
1170.00
1.3 Soft formation excavation up to cut of level m3 1 40 18 0.5 360.00
1.4 Filling and Compaction with selected material m3 1 40 18 0.5 360.00

Cart away and deposit excavated surplus material to a m3
1.5 216.00
distance not exceeding 1km
2 Concrete work
2.1 C-25 concrete m3 1 40 18 0.25 180.00
2.2 Cyclopean concrete m3 1 40 18 1.33 954.00
2.3 Reinf. Φ12mm for main reinforcement KG 1 2914.16 0.88 2564.46
2.4 Reinf. Φ10mm for lateral reinforcement KG 1 2885.12 0.617 1780.12
2.5 Tying wire KG 2.56

Dosha Head Work Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Dosha Head Work Design

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dosha Head Work Design

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DATA SHEET FOR CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE USING THE FLOAT GAUGING TECHNIQUE

Enter data in green cells Calculations are performed in yellow cells

Date: Time at start:

Total Width (metres): 3

FLOAT MEASUREMENTS VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 1

CALCULATION OF DISCHARGE (m3/s) OBSERVATIONS (weather, flow conditions, diffi

Average cross section area: 0.353

Discharge (Flow) (m3/s): 0.700 700.000

are performed in yellow cells Do not change red cells

Staff Gauge at start:

Total Width (metres): 3.2 Total Width (metres): 3.1

VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 2 VELOCITY MEASUREMENT 3

ONS (weather, flow conditions, difficulties experienced during measurement)

1904.550 0.000 0.035 0 0 #DIV/0! 0.009 0.00

INTERPOLAT FOR QD Tell water depth Velocity

AVERAGE RIVER BED SLOPE

Design of Main canal (left side canal )based on Manning's equation

Calculate A=b*d+md^2 0.495

28.5714285714 0.09327379 2.66496544 r^2/3

PART-2. DISCHARGE COOFICIENT DETER

19 Check for velocity head (Ha) =Ha =V2/2g where

PART-3. CHECK FOR AFLUX

PART-4. WEIR PROFILE DETERMINA

Down stream slope =H : V 0.8

20 4.1. determination of D/S face

21 Up stream profile determination……………. Y =((0.724(X+0.27*Hd)1.85)/(Hd0.85))+0.126Hd-0.4

The U/S profile extend up to X=-0.27Hd =

4.2. determination of U/S face

4.3. determination Rivers curve

PART-5. HYDRAULIC JUMP DETER

Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

5.2. Length of D/s aprone

Stage, H (m) Q (m3/s) He=(Q/CL)2/3 (m)

1904.55 0.00 0.00

PART-6. STILLING BASIN DESIG

Ratio of Length of stilling basin & Y2 from the graph (L/Y2) =

Part-7. DESIGN OF IMPERVIOUS AND PERVI

Post Jump Height (Y2) =

VALUE UNIT REMARK

1.34 0 0.67 1.34

-0.6318 -0.6318 -10.6318 -10.6318

5.23327855988926 D/S RBL-0.3+Y1+((q/Y1)2/2*g)

Incoming froude number (Fr1) =V1/ √(gy1)

5.3. Back water curve length(BL)

Tail water depth and Post Jump (m)

VALUE REMARK 1,907.0

0 0.00 0.00 0.00

OUS AND PERVIOUS APRON

FINAL OUT PUT

Values of K & n based on U/S shape

1,909.0 TWD and Post jump comparasion

1,908.0 Tail water depth (m) Jhfl 1907.949

U/s HFL=RBL+H+(He-ha ) U/s TEL=U/sHFL+ha

1907.147 1907.147 0.000

Condition Recommended basin

D/S HFL = 1907.949

Y2 = 3.34 TWD= 3.399