BC23019731

MUHAMMAD BILAWAL

Critical Thinking and Reflective Practices (EDU406)

Assignment 1 (Fall 2023)

Total Marks: 15
Topics: 37 - 60

Instructions:
 Late assignments will not be accepted.
 If the file is corrupt or problematic, it will be marked zero.
 Plagiarism will never be tolerated. Plagiarism occurs when a student uses work done
by someone else as if it was his or her own; however, taking the ideas from different
sources and expressing them in your own words will be encouraged.
 No assignment will be accepted via e-mail.
 The solution file should be in Word document format; the font color should be
preferably black and font size should be 12 Times New Roman.

Assignment Question

Q. Critically analyze the reflection models of David Boud (1985) and Atkins & Murphy (1994).
Also, suggest which one is more suitable in terms of its application and why?
15 marks
_____________________________________________________________________________

Rubric
Concept Marks Distribution

Critical analysis of David Boud (1985) and Atkins & Murphy 8 marks
 (1994) reflective model.
Suggestions regarding suitability of model in terms of its 7 marks
application along with justification

Solution:
Reflection is an integral part of the learning process, aiding individuals in understanding
and improving their practices. This analysis critically evaluates the reflection models proposed
by David Boud (1985) and Atkins & Murphy (1994) and provides suggestions on their suitability
for different applications.

Critical Analysis of David Boud's Model (1985)

David Boud's reflective model outlines a systematic three-step process: Description,

Interpretation, and Outcome/Action.

Strengths:
 Offers a structured and clear approach to reflection.
 Encourages a deep exploration of emotions and experiences.
Weaknesses:
 May oversimplify the intricacies of reflective practice.
 Some critics argue it lacks depth in addressing social and contextual factors.

Critical Analysis of Atkins & Murphy's Model (1994)

Atkins & Murphy's model introduces a dual focus on anticipatory reflection before action and
retrospective reflection after action.
Strengths:
 Recognizes the significance of both pre- and post-action reflection.
 Incorporates anticipatory reflection, contributing to improved decision-making.
Weaknesses:
 The dual focus may appear complex and challenging to consistently apply.

Suggestions Regarding Model Suitability

Atkins & Murphy's Model (1994):
 Suitability:
 Ideal for individuals and professionals appreciating a comprehensive approach to
reflection.
 More suitable for scenarios where strategic decision-making is a key aspect of
reflective practice.
Justification
Atkins & Murphy's model offers a valuable framework for those seeking a comprehensive
reflection process. Its strengths lie in the holistic perspective it provides, contributing to
improved decision-making. However, potential complexity and resource intensity may limit its
applicability in certain situations. Despite these drawbacks, the model's strengths make it
particularly suitable for contexts where a thorough examination of decisions and their outcomes
is essential.