Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OGUNSOLA and OLAOYE (2023) - Information Sharing Behaviour of Visually Impaired Students
OGUNSOLA and OLAOYE (2023) - Information Sharing Behaviour of Visually Impaired Students
OGUNSOLA and OLAOYE (2023) - Information Sharing Behaviour of Visually Impaired Students
Kemi Ogunsola*
(Senior Lecturer, University of Ibadan)
Dorcas Olasunbo Olaoye*
(Researcher, University of Ibadan)
<abstract>
The study sheds light on the kind of information shared by the
respondents, the most appropriate platforms they use, how frequently they
share information as well as the influence of activities, functionalities,
social incentives and inspiring systems on the information sharing
behaviour of persons with visual impairment (PVI). It provides answers
to four research questions. Adopted a qualitative approach, and a survey
was conducted using semi-structured in-depth interviews. Thirty out of 64
PVIs were purposively selected for interviews which were recorded and
transcribed. NVIVO Version 11 was used for analysis. The findings show
that many of the respondents prefer to share information on social media.
They shared personal information with friends for leisure rather than for
academic purposes. The researchers recommended examining practical
ways to encourage PVIs to share academic information among themselves
instead of primarily using it for leisure.
❙Key words
Assistive technologies, Information and communication technologies,
Information sharing, Social media, Visual impairment
In every society, it has been realised that persons with visual impairment
(PVI) need information as much as sighted persons (Adetoro, 2010). They
need the information to function effectively as human beings and contribute
effectively to society; this necessitates an increase in advocacy for equal
access to information by PVI in recent times (Akano, 2017). According to
Sugiono, Denny, and Andriani (2018), human sight is highly instrumental
in acquiring information from the immediate environment. Consequently,
living with visual impairment (VI) could make information seeking,
acquisition and sharing difficult. Regardless of this, information and
communication technology (ICTs) and cyberspace have a huge impact on
the information sharing behaviour of special needs individuals in this
modern time.
Information sharing behaviour is an act of exchanging information by
people who have certain aims and using certain media (Mutia and Atmi,
2018). Effective information sharing lowers the cost and time of acquiring
information and knowledge. It prevents the wastages that come with
repeated investment in already existing knowledge resources, adds value and
promotes the creative use of resources (Babalola and Ogunsola, 2018; Mutia
and Atmi, 2018). Among the numerous information seekers and internet
users are people living with disabilities. Smith, Silver, Johnson, and Jiang
(2019) revealed that over 11% of the world's population (650 million) suffer
from a variety of disabilities. About 2.2 billion people have near or distance
vision impairment, 87% of whom live in low and middle-income countries.
Akano (2017) reports that blindness was 40% more common among women
of different age categories in Nigeria although 80% of all visual
impairments are preventable (WHO, 2018).
Visual impairment refers to a kind of limitation a person can experience
in the eye or visual system which results in loss of vision (Cain and
Fanshawe, 2019). WHO (2018) classified vision impairment as mild,
Ⅱ. Statement of Problem
There are studies on visually impaired persons in Nigeria but not many
examined the dynamics of information sharing among visually impaired
persons. Most research focused on the challenges of educating visually
impaired persons (Oladejo and Oladejo, 2011; Omede, 2013). Mutia and
Atmi (2018), examined information sharing behaviour of parents of disabled
persons; Adetoro (2010) studied the reading interest and information needs
of persons with visual impairment in Nigeria while Olaoye (2016) focused
on the availability of information materials, library services accessibility and
To achieve the objectives of this study, the following questions were raised:
1. Do the virtually impaired students share information and what are the
main or alternative media used in sharing information?
2. What kind of information do the visually impaired students share in
the Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo?
3. How often do visually impaired students share information in the
Federal College of Education (Special), Oyo?
4. What is the influence of activities, functionalities, social incentives and
inspiring systems on the information sharing behaviour of visually
impaired students?
Ⅴ. Literature Review
Ⅵ. Methodology
This study adopted the qualitative research design which allows the
researcher to get an in-depth insight into the study. The method is the most
appropriate for under-studying individuals who are alike and have similar
experiences and challenges (Hammarberg, Kirkman, and de Lacey, 2016). The
study attempts to understand people's perceptions, perspectives and notions of
a particular situation. The design was used to examine the information sharing
behaviour of visually impaired persons with the view of knowing what
information they share, the most appropriate platforms they use, how
frequently they share the information as well as the influence of activities,
social incentives and inspiring systems on the information sharing behaviour
of visually impaired students of Federal College of Education Special, Oyo.
The choice of this location was because the school offers specialised education
to people living with disabilities understudied. It is expected that this school
will have a large number of PVI from where a sample can be selected.
The software (NVIVO) generated the nodes and word cloud reported in
the research findings.
Ⅷ. Demography of Respondents
Data from the study also show that 12 (40%) respondents were in the
Social Studies department, 5 (17%) respondents were in the English and
Music departments, 3 (10%) were in the Political Science department and
2 (7%) came from Christian Religious Studies department. The remaining
8 (26%) respondents were in computer science, history and primary
education departments.
To ensure that the interview guide is valid, content validity was carried
out on the instrument. The content validity ensures that the content of the
interview guide meets the needs of the research objectives and questions of
the study. To ensure this, two experts in the field of special education
assessed the contents of the questions in the interview guide.
Ⅸ. Findings
Figure 1 reveals that the most frequently used word (the biggest-sized
keyword) in the context of the question asked is “information,” followed by
“share,” “Facebook” and “WhatsApp” respectively. Below are excerpts from
transcripts that support these findings:
“I post on Facebook so that the public can see it, most likely on Facebook
and WhatsApp, I also do verbal conversation.” (Female/24years/Moderately
Visually Impaired)
“Sending and receiving messages through my email account. With the help
of some applications on my phone, I can access any medium for sharing
[Table 3] Responses to the kind of Information shared by the visually impaired students
Figure 2 –Although the word cloud showed that “information” has the
highest frequency, the types of “information” can be “personal”,
“academic,” “sports” or “political.” Figure 2, shows that the most frequently
shared type of information is “personal,” “friends,” and “meeting.” The data
collected showed that “academic” and “news” information also occurred but
at fewer times. On the lower side, “professional,” “sport,” “political,”
“I share information about we living with visual impairment, sport news and
religious stuff.” (Male/26years/Blind)
The results from Table 4 showed that 18 (60%) respondents indicated that
they share information every day and frequently, while 4 (13.3%)
respondents said that they share information randomly but within a week.
Figure 3, shows that the majority of the respondents share information
frequently and daily while some do so weekly.
Figure 3 reveals that the most frequently used word in the context of the
question asked is “weekly” followed by “frequent” and “every day.”
These findings were supported by some of the excerpts from the
transcripts which are as follows:
Excerpts from respondents who share information daily:
[Figure 4] Activities, materials, social incentives and inspiring systems on the information sharing
behaviour of visually impaired students
Figure 4 shows that when visually impaired students have access to social
incentives, they were motivated to share information using platforms such
as Facebook, and WhatsApp. Although, they also mentioned YouTube, it
was in fewer times. Figure 4 also shows that the most frequently used
words in the context of the question asked are “information,” “share,”
“platform,” “Facebook” and “WhatsApp.” Other identified keywords that
occurred fewer times include; “incentive,” “details,” “motivate,” “friends”
and “comment.” Functionalities mentioned were “comment,” “block,” “like,”
“unfollow,” “download,” “control,” “message” and “post.” The various
“If my service provider gives me bonus airtime and there’s any information
I want to share; it makes it easy for me to share.” (Male/22years/Blind)
“Oftentimes when some people that are fond of sharing information not
minding whether you are interested or not…as I have done in the past, I will
just block them.” (Male/22years/Moderately Visually Impaired)
Ⅹ. Discussion of Findings
Findings from this study revealed that the majority of the respondents
share information. This resonates with a previous study by Shpigelman and
Gill (2014) that revealed that challenged individuals use social media for
sharing information, especially Facebook. The result of this study shows that
the respondents share information on Facebook, WhatsApp, Telegram,
Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn. This is in line with the assertion
from Schultz, Jacobs, and Schultz (2013) that social networking appears to
hold promise for adolescent individuals with disabilities as it is an avenue
for increasing social interaction with others in what has become a
conventional method of communication. Griffiths et al. (2012) discussed
ways social media assisted individuals with disabilities in sharing
information with their doctors or in building a community, Griffiths et al.
This study focused on visually impaired students, it did not put other
types of disabilities into consideration.
ⅫⅠ. Conclusion
The use of technological tools and social media is not yet an integral part
of the learning environment for PVI in the Federal College of Education
(Special), Oyo. Most of the students using them learn from friends and
families, and still face the limitation of isolated learning, fear of privacy and
insufficient knowledge of the use of the technological tool and social media.
Information sharing is growing and is significantly important to the special
❙ References
Adetoro, N. 2010. “Reading Interest and Information Needs of Persons with Visual
Impairment in Nigeria”. South Africa Journal of Library and Information
Science 76(1), pp. 49-56.
Akano, O. F. 2017. “Vision Health Disparities in Blindness and Visual Impairment in
Nigeria: A Review of the Nigerian National Blindness and Visual Impairment
Survey”. Africa Vision Eye Health 76(1), pp. 1-5.
Anderson, M. and Jiang, J. 2018. Teens and Their Experiences on Social Media.
Retrieved on 10 October 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/
11/28/teens-and-their-experiences-on-social-media/.
Babalola, A. J. and Ogunsola, K. 2018. “Knowledge Sharing Practices and Business
Performance of Small and Medium-Scale Enterprises in Ibadan, Nigeria”.
Nigeria Journal of Computer Literacy 13, pp. 69-80.
Babalola, Y. T. and Yacob, H. 2011. “Library and Information Services to the Visually
Impaired-The role of Academic Libraries”. Canadian Social Science 7(1), pp.
140-147.
Blancher, J. and Howell, E. 2008. “Becoming Social: Interventions with Youth Who
Have High Functioning Autism or Asperger’s Syndrome”. The Exceptional
Parent 38(10), pp. 56-57.
Cain, M. and Fanshawe, M. 2019. “Opening Eyes to Vision Impairment: Diversity is
Just Another Way of Seeing”. in S. Carter ed., Opening Eyes onto Diversity
and Inclusion (pp. 239-288). Toowoomba: University of Southern Queensland
Press.
Connect ABILITY. 2011. Visual Impairment. Retrieved on 10 October 2022 from
https://connectability.ca/2011/10/11/visual-impairment/.
Cook, K. S. and Rice, E. 2006. “Social Exchange Theory”. in J. DeLamater ed.,
Handbook of Social Psychology. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 53-76.
Kemi Ogunsola
Dorcas Olasunbo Olaoye
E-mail : olukemi11@yahoo.com
E-mail : olaoyeolasunmbo@gmail.com