Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HCI Report New
HCI Report New
HCI Report New
4 Yes 40s - -
We concluded that specific modifications are required for the final At home, we included different functions for the users. The user
prototype after examining think-aloud testing conducted with can select the economy mode function that enables the system to
various users. operate the heating system automatically with effective use of
energy with just one touch. It automatically controls all heaters by
The majority of people complained about how difficult
effectively scheduling all heaters.
it is to use the master control function.
The option to examine several users' schedules was not
A scheduled timer option is installed in the home so that every
included.
user can create their schedule of heating their desired rooms
Room overview function of different rooms was not
included. without wastage of energy.
There was no option for multiple room selection in the Individual Room Control System
Schedule function
The think-aloud testing done with different users. Test tasks given
to users to operate our prototypes. Through different observations
and error correction, we arrived at our final prototype using
Balsamic wireframes. This heating system includes of different
types sensors like temperature, proximity sensors motion
sensors/PIR.
Home
Fig-3 Indicates the Individual Room Control System
Weather Forecast
4
Heating Control System, January, 2024, Zwickau, Germany Jeril Davis Palatty & Sachin Pavoor Veetil
Usage Statistics
Voice Activation
5
Heating Control System, January, 2024, Zwickau, Germany Jeril Davis Palatty & Sachin Pavoor Veetil.
[3] Jakob Nielsen, in Nielsen Norman Group, 2012 January 15, 2012
For this project, we employed think-aloud testing with various https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/
users for each pen and paper prototype. Each user was assigned a #:~:text=Definition%3A%20In%20a%20thinking%20aloud,keep%20up%20a
%20running%20monologue
set of tasks based on our success criteria. Through analysis of test
findings, including user observations and feedback, we used the [4] Low-fidelity prototyping: What is it and how can it help? In Figma,
Balsamiq wireframe tools to finish our prototype. We adjusted the https://www.figma.com/resource-library/low-fidelity-prototyping/
function in response to the majority of users' complaints that our
master button is not user-friendly. A few users proposed adding a
schedule view option to a few functions to improve the
application's efficiency. Another significant flaw that we later
incorporated was the room overviewing features that were
identified in the think-aloud testing.
Conclusion
We developed a final prototype using Balsamiq wireframes after
testing low-fidelity prototypes with several users. We were able to
add or delete features from our final prototype and make some
minor modifications to make it more efficient by using think-aloud
testing. Several pen-and-paper+ prototypes forced the user to
choose the best one through spoken thought. When compared to
evaluating a single pen and paper prototype, user comments and