Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beijing20conference2013 1420june2020131
Beijing20conference2013 1420june2020131
net/publication/267639426
CITATIONS READS
0 599
3 authors:
Gy R. Hashim
Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor (UCS)
211 PUBLICATIONS 498 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Shireen Haron on 03 November 2014.
1
Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
sakinah@uum.edu.my
2
Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
shireen738@salam.uitm.edu.my
3
Faculty of Administrative Science and Policy Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
gy@salam.uitm.edu.my
Abstract
Leadership development and succession planning have been widely
discussed and studied with a varying focus. In recent times, many
academicians and researchers have made significant contributions in
the theories and practice of leadership development and succession
planning. Theses efforts are the most promising means of assuring
the sustainability which is vital to the long-term success of an
organisation. However, leadership development is an area that is
insufficient within institutions of higher education. This paper
discusses the senior leader’s of public institutions of higher
education’s role in developing a strong pipeline in organization. It also
examine the challenges of senior leaders involvement and
recommends some efforts that need to be taken.
Introduction
The essences of succession planning includes identification and development for key
positions (Rothwell, 2010). Meanwhile, Hart, Conklin and Allen (2008) defined
leadership development as a process of expanding an organization‟s capacity to
generate leadership potential within the organization to achieve organizational goals.
Therefore, developing future leaders is critically important in succession planning and
leadership development. In best-practice organization, senior leaders seem to be in
the lead role to develop potential leaders (Morrison, 2011).
1
This is a conceptual review of the importance of senior leader‟s role. The paper
discusses the senior leader‟s of public institutions of higher education‟s role in
developing a strong pipeline in organization. It also examine the challenges of senior
leaders‟ involvement and recommends some efforts that need to be taken.
Given the scrutiny of the leadership development initiatives, there is a need for senior
leaders to spend as much as one third of their time developing the organisation‟s
leaders in formal programs (Tichy, 2012). There are a few reasons behind this
suggestion:
a) During the leadership development program, participants are receptive to new
ideas and directions. If future leaders get all this thing from the top leaders of the
organisation, it will gives power, support and the thinking behind the new directions
and behaviours required.
2
b) Senior leaders as teachers in the program assess the changing realities of the
ideas and modify them to be relevant and fit the needs of the current setting. They
can select ideas that add significant value to the organisation.
c) They provide frameworks for the decisions of managers in an organization. They
give a focus for common goals and actions which can be implemented back in the
work environment (Cacioppe, 1998a).
These reasons may help to answer the importance of senior leaders role in
leadership development initiatives.
In line with the organization‟s awareness of the importance of the role played by
senior leaders, they are increasingly engaging managerial personnel in the
leadership development process, and that managers add unique value to building the
leadership pipeline beyond that of external experts and other professionals (Tichy,
2004; Allio, 2003). Several large corporations are taking senior management leaders
to the next level by having senior leaders conduct the leadership development
initiatives themself. For instance, former CEO of PepsiCo, Roger Enrico, spent 100
days a year running Pepsi‟s leadership development program for top management.
Similarly, General Electric‟s (GE) John F. Welch Leadership Center, a
comprehensive development program in which executives and managers at all levels
are largely responsible for teaching the curriculum and delivering a range of
leadership development activities (Tichy, 1989). Mort Topfer, vice chairman of the
board of Dell was involved not only as executive sponsor, but as par ticipant,
instructor, coach, and cheerleader in their leadership development program (Winston,
2008). Scientific-Atlantic, a high tech company implemented the Leaders
Developing Leaders Mentoring Program. The mentors that participate in the
program are the organization‟s top leaders (Salopek, 2004). Other organizations
have taken and are taking this same kind of initiative such as Compaq,
Servicemaster‟s, Hewlett-Packard‟s, Johnson & Johnson, and Shell (Fulmer et al.,
2000; Hurt and Homan, 2005).
There are a few scholars who discussed the role that should be played by senior
leaders. For instance, Cohn, Khurana and Reeves (2005) assert that, a part of the
line manager‟s role is recognizing her subordinates‟ developmental needs, helping
them develop new skills, and providing them with opportunities for professional and
personal growth. They need to mentor emerging leaders both within and outside of
their own department, disseminating key knowledge and offering evaluations and
feedback. Basically, leadership commitment and involvement can be translated into a
number of functions as follows.
a) Preparation activities
The starting point for leadership development is preparation activities. In this regard,
senior leaders must identify development opportunities that are crucial to leadership
development (Leibman, Bruer and Maki, 1996). In addition, Harris and Barnes (2006)
shared their experience on how Lilly Research Laboratories encourage and
supported deep engagement of senior leaders in leadership development. They play
roles in preparation activities by shaping strategy and focus on implementation,
assess needs and gap in leadership pipeline.
3
b) Teaching
Normally, organization will hire or invite professors and consultant leadership trainers
to develop future leaders. However, Allio (2003) claims that they are not the right
people to develop leaders. Senior leaders leaders are in best position to teach
future leaders . They are the people who are able to provide the best insights into the
unwritten rules of the organization, help navigate employees around potential issues,
and provide encouragement (Zenger and Folkman, 2003). In fact, history has proven
that great leaders are also great teachers (Cacioppe, 1998; Tichy, 2012).
The leading organization also encourages senior leaders to teach classes and
facilitate workshops on a series of leadership development topics. Groves (2007) in
his study of 30 CEOs and human resource executives across 15 best practice
organizations found that leading organizations actively encourage learning and
knowledge sharing by tasking their leaders with teaching responsibilities. The
teaching process actively reinforces the value of learning, encourages the effective
dissemination of knowledge, and helps employees understand how they may apply
such knowledge to their work and collectively influence important outcomes in the
organization.
Tichy (2012) claims that the secret of successful organization is their leaders
personally and actively develop leaders. In addition, senior leaders must have a
“teachable point of view”, a point of view that they were committed to, that involved a
dynamic, compelling vision or story of where the organisation is going and how it is
going to get there. They should orchestrate open and candid discussion. They
teach, conduct a discussion and informal interaction. This way, they can pass their
experience to future leaders.
4
c) Developmental relationship
Usually delivered through coaching and mentoring, developmental relationship is an
essential initiatives in leadership development. Internal mentoring and coaching has
a significant impact on the development of emerging leaders. Basically, senior
leaders should mentor and showcase potential leaders (Leibman et al. 1996). Mullen
(2009) describes mentor as the “a guide who opens up others to new experiences
and the world, and who encourages and protects protégés” (2009, p.10). A majority
of leading firms use internal mentoring programs to develop high-potential
employees. Through pairing with internal senior mentors, high-potentials are
introduced to years of knowledge and experience. Leading firms use both internal
and external coaches to address specific developmental needs or to help action
learning groups as they grapple with complex challenges (Fulmer, Stumpf and Bleak,
2009).
d) Experiential learning
It's very effective to pair classroom training with real-life exposure to a variety of jobs
and bosses-using techniques like job rotation, special assignments "action learning"
(Conger and Fulmer, 2003). According to Leibman et al. (1996), senior leaders
should manage developmental opportunities for potential leaders. In this regard,
senior leaders must arrange assignments that are challenging, critical and significant.
Managers at all levels are engaged in delivering leadership development activities
such as facilitating action learning projects, and creating assignments that fall
outside the employee‟s functional background (Groves, 2007).
Senior leaders, with the support of human resource professionals, deliver the
projects, assignments, and courses. Regarding stretch assignments, the executives
reported that the many developmental benefits include exposing high potentials to
several functional and product areas, providing invaluable working experiences with a
variety of executives and colleagues, and collecting diagnostic data on high
potentials‟ performance to inform the succession planning decisions. As managers‟
developmental needs change over the course of their career, executives task them
with stretch assignments that address the organization‟s strategic issues and adjust
the lists of high potentials according to their performance on such assignments
(Groves, 2007).
5
„„sponsorship‟‟ in leadership development. This approach empowered to directly invite
an aspiring leader to a task or role often outside their immediate skill or task base, to
provide a critical learning and leadership development experience. Ideal sponsors
are also willing to use their political capital in an organization, when necessary, to
support a promising young leader in getting the resources to do a task, or when they
fail at a task for unforeseen reasons (Kambil, 2010).
According to the report, this programs are built on the theory that senior leaders are
uniquely positioned to espouse and teach the leadership values and skills of
organizations. In this inexpensive, scalability, and efficient program, calibre senior
leaders will become teachers, coaches, and or mentors for the organization‟s future
leaders. In fact, this program must be a priority in any organization if they serious to
develop their leadership pipeline.
6
Instilling the culture of developing people has to start from the top. Setting
expectations through the performance management process and reinforcing them
through rewards and recognition are critical for embedding these priorities in the
culture, and managers need to be held accountable for supporting the development
of their staff (Brown, 2010).
In short, the way to get senior leaders involved in leadership development is to make
them central to the process and to communicate the organizational value and the
personal rewards that will result from their engagement (Harris and Barnes, 2006).
Another challenge is to ensure the success of senior leader‟s efforts. In this regard,
organization should incorporate the following four important components: use a
selection process to identify which leaders will develop new leaders, prepare and
develop your seasoned leaders to effectively teach, coach, and develop future
leaders, hold leaders accountable for developing others through assessment, and
recognize those leaders who do it well (The Human Capital Institute, 2010). In this
sense, senior leaders have succession planning objectives as part of their
performance objectives, which drive rewards.
7
HRD professionals role in organization must also change. They must identify senior
leaders to teach and help them to create a point of view as well as design the right
approaches for development. When senior leaders do become involved in potential
leaders development, learning professionals may be called upon to help them
prepare for roles as mentors and coaches. A close alliance between leaders and the
learning function can help to ensure that candidate development activities actually
address the needs identified for each candidate and are relevant to specific
challenges the organization faces, while also providing oversight to maintain
consistency and quality in the development process (Morrison, 2011).
Conclusion
Clearly, having the leader‟s involvement and participation in every stage and form
of leadership development initiatives is very crucial. They are the driver of
development efforts and they add unique value to the process. It is a core skill
required of senior leaders and should be emphasised in organizational leadership
development initiatives to facilitate leadership pipeline. This paper noted the
importance of senior leaders involvement and participation. They need to show their
interest and commitment in order to get commitment from others. They must make
use their valuable experience in order to fill leadership pipeline. They play a central
role in making development visible and exhibit commitment to the development
agenda. In short, senior leaders‟ involvement and participation is very critical to
develop a strong pipeline in any organization.
References
New Bersin & Associates Research Shows Three Times Greater Business Impact
Generated by Senior Leaders Who Coach and Develop Employees, 2011, Bersin by
Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www.bersin.com/News/Content.aspx?id=14469
Allio, R. 2003. “Interview: Noel M. Tichy explains why the virtuous teaching cycle is
integral to effective leadership, Strategy & Leadership”, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 20-26
Brooks, W., Ferrandou, C. & Anderson, J. 2007. "L & D must be sold to senior
leaders, e.learning age", pp. 3.
Bunker, KA., Hall, DT., & Kram, KE. (Eds.). 2010, Extraordinary leadership:
addressing the gaps in senior executive development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., San
Francisco
Buus, I., & Saslow, S. 2005. "The evolution of leadership development, Strategic HR
Review", vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 28–31.
8
Cacioppe, R. 1998a. "Leaders developing leaders : an effective way to enhance
leadership development programs, Leadership & Organization Development
Journal", vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 194–198.
Cacioppe, R. 1998b. "An integrated model and approach for the design of effective
leadership development programs, Leadership & Organization Development
Journal", vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 44–53.
Cohen, E & Tichy, N. 1997. "How leaders develop leaders, Training and
development", vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 58-63, 65-67, 69-77.
Cohn, J. M., Khurana, R., & Reeves, L. 2005. "Growing talent as if your business
depended on it. Harvard Business Review", vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 63-70.
Friday, E., Friday, S. S. & Green, A. L. 2004. "A reconceptualization of mentoring and
sponsoring, Management Decision", vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 628–644.
doi:10.1108/00251740410538488
Fulmer, R. M., Stumpf, S. A., & Bleak, J. 2009. "The strategic development of high
potential leaders, Strategy & Leadership", vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 17–22.
doi:10.1108/10878570910954600
Fulmer, R. M., Gibbs, P. A., & Goldsmith, M. 2000. "Developing Leaders : How
Winning Companies Keep On Winning, MIT Sloan Management Review", vol. 42, no.
1, pp. 49.
Harris, J., & Barnes, B. K. 2006. "Inspirational leadership: involving senior leaders in
developing the next generation, Industrial and Commercial Training", vol. 38, no. 4,
pp. 196–200. doi:10.1108/00197850610671973
Hewes, R., Greenly, R., Pendergast, K., & C, E. 2012. Learning from senior leader
engagement. T+D, (July), pp. 42–46.
9
Kambil, A. 2010. "Developing the next generation of leaders. Journal of Business
Strategy", vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 43–45. doi:10.1108/02756661011025062
Leibman, M., Bruer, R. and Maki, B. 1996. "Succession management: the next
generation of succession planning, Human Resource Planning", vol. 19, no. 3, pp.
16-29.
Molinaro, V., & Weiss, D. 2005. "Closing the leadership gap, CMA Management",
(September), pp. 21–23.
Human Capital Institute, & Lee Hecht Harrison. 2010, Leaders Developing Leaders:
Capitalizing on the Demographic Gift To Revive Your Leadership Development
Program. Washington, D.C.
Tichy, N. 2012. "Developing Leaders. Leadership Excellence", vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 5.
Velsor, E. V., McCauley, C. D., & Ruderman, M. N. (eds.) 2010. The Center for
Creative Leadership handbook of leadership development (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass,
San Francisco
10
Zenger, J. H., & Folkman, J. 2002, The extraordinary leader: Turning good managers
into great leaders, McGraw Hill, New York
11