Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Police Operations Theory and Practice 6th Edition Hess Test Bank

Police Operations Theory and Practice


6th Edition Hess Test Bank
Visit to get the accurate and complete content:

https://testbankfan.com/download/police-operations-theory-and-practice-6th-edition-h
ess-test-bank/

Visit TestBankFan.com to get complete for all chapters


Police Operations Theory and Practice 6th Edition Hess Test Bank

CHAPTER 2: COMMUNICATION: THE FOUNDATION OF POLICE


OPERATIONS

MULTIPLE CHOICE

1. The right to stop and question suspicious people was established in the landmark case of
a. Miranda v. Arizona.
b. Florida v. J.L.
c. Dickerson v. United States.
d. Alabama v. White.
e. Terry v. Ohio.
ANS: E PTS: 1 REF: (p. 52)
OBJ: Which case established the right of police officers to stop and question a person.

2. __________ ___________ is defined as communication that can be understood by the intended


audience and meets the purpose of the communicator.
a. The grapevine
b. The language line
c. Electronic voice translation
d. Plain language
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 42)
OBJ: What positive outcomes effective communication can produce.

3. Communication that flows laterally among those on the same “level” within an organization is
considered
a. horizontal.
b. vertical.
c. diagonal.
d. perpendicular.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: A PTS: 1 REF: (p. 32)
OBJ: In what directions communication might flow.

4. Police officers rely heavily on the radio and _________ to retrieve critical information when dealing
with incidents.
a. public news.
b. other officers
c. dispatchers.
d. in-car laptops.
ANS: C PTS: 1 REF: (p. 32)
OBJ: What positive outcomes effective communication can produce.

5. Special problems in communicating via radios and cell phones include


a. lack of interoperability.
b. interference on the line and dropped calls
c. keeping police operations secure.
d. all of the other choices.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 39)

Visit TestBankFan.com to get complete for all chapters


OBJ: What challenges and concerns law enforcement has encountered with communications
technology.

6. All are valuable databases for law enforcement except


a. NCIC.
b. LInX.
c. LEO.
d. all are valuable databases for law enforcement.
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 35)
OBJ: What databases can be of value to law enforcement.

7. Effective communication can be used to


a. negotiate.
b. diffuse.
c. motivate.
d. all of the other choices.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 31)
OBJ: What positive outcomes effective communication can produce.

8. LInX is a
a. regional information-sharing network.
b. secure radio system reserved for law enforcement and the military.
c. new tracking system.
d. GPS system for dispatchers to track the whereabouts of law enforcement officers.
ANS: A PTS: 1 REF: (p. 37)
OBJ: What positive outcomes effective communication can produce.

9. Incoherent speech may indicate


a. intoxication.
b. a hearing impairment.
c. Alzheimer’s disease.
d. any of the other choices.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 44) |(p. 48)
OBJ: What special populations may pose especially challenging communication issues.| When
slurred speech may not be the result of intoxication.

10. One way to avoid giving the Miranda warning is to ask a suspect to come to the station to be
interviewed, voluntarily, without arrest. Such statements are known as a
a. Terry stop.
b. Dickerson statement.
c. Beheler admonition.
d. Florida warning.
ANS: C PTS: 1 REF: (p. 63)
OBJ: Which case established the right of police officers to stop and question a person.

11. A lawful stop must be based on __________________ that the person stopped is about to be or is
actually engaged in criminal activity.
a. proof beyond a reasonable doubt
b. reasonable suspicion
c. mere suspicion
d. a preponderance of evidence
e. exigent cause
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 52)
OBJ: Which case established the right of police officers to stop and question a person.

12. A witness may be


a. a victim.
b. a scientific specialist.
c. an observer of an event.
d. any of the other choices.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: D PTS: 1 REF: (p. 56)
OBJ: What the characteristics of effective police reports are.

13. To be effective, interviews should be based on


a. probable cause.
b. reasonable suspicion.
c. specific goals and objectives.
d. the element of surprise.
e. conditional privileges.
ANS: C PTS: 1 REF: (p. 53)
OBJ: What the characteristics of effective police reports are.

14. The Supreme Court in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
a. concluded that a person stopped for questioning may lawfully refuse to tell the police his
or her name.
b. concluded that a suspect’s refusal to give his or her name can warrant an arrest.
c. upheld a Nevada law that, during a Terry stop, a person need not answer any questions
concerning his or her identity.
d. both concluded that a person stopped for questioning may lawfully refuse to tell the police
his or her name and upheld a Nevada law that, during a Terry stop, a person need not
answer any questions concerning his or her identity.
e. none of the other choices.
ANS: B PTS: 1 REF: (p. 53)
OBJ: Which case established the right of police officers to stop and question a person.

15. According to your text, when training officers to interview eyewitnesses, the officer should use what
type of questions?
a. leading questions
b. closed-ended questions
c. open-ended questions
d. all of the other choices
e. none of the other choices
ANS: C PTS: 1 REF: (p. 53)
OBJ: What the characteristics of effective police reports are.

16. Sandoval’s “Strategies to Avoid Interview Contamination” includes a Focus on Interview Environment
that recommends
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR
ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied


warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this
agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this
agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the
maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable
state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of
this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the


Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the
Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™
electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any
volunteers associated with the production, promotion and
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless
from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that
arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project
Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or
deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect
you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of


Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new
computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of
volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the


assistance they need are critical to reaching Project
Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™
collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In
2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was
created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project
Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your
efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the
Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project


Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-
profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the
laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by
the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal
tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax
deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and
your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500


West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact
links and up to date contact information can be found at the
Foundation’s website and official page at
www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to


the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation
Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without
widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission
of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works
that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form
accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated
equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly
important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws


regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of
the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform
and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many
fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not
solicit donations in locations where we have not received written
confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or
determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states


where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know
of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from
donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot


make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations
received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp
our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current


donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a
number of other ways including checks, online payments and
credit card donations. To donate, please visit:
www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could
be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose
network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several


printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by
copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus,
we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any
particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear
about new eBooks.

You might also like