Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Significance of Small Voltage in Impedance
Significance of Small Voltage in Impedance
2V q
2 = − 共n p − nm兲, 共2兲
z
where q is the electrical charge of the ions, and jr the density
of currents of positive 共r = p兲 and negative 共r = m兲 ions given
by
jr = − D 冉 nr
±
q V
nr
z k BT z
,冊 共3兲
haves in a linear manner, and the concept of electrical im- as reported in Ref. 8
pedance is meaningful. In this framework Eq. 共1兲 and Eq. We can now investigate for what amplitude of the ap-
共2兲, by taking into account Eq. 共3兲, can be rewritten as plied signal the condition ␦nr共z , t兲 Ⰶ N is verified. Since
␦nr共z,t兲
t
=−D 冉
2␦nr共z,t兲 qN 2V共z,t兲
z2
±
k BT z 2
, 冊 ␦nr共z , t兲 = r共z兲exp共it兲, the maximum variation of ␦nr共z , t兲
is 兩␦nr共z , t兲兩 = 2兩共z兲兩 艋 兩p0 sinh共d / 2兲兩. Consequently, the
condition we are looking for is, by taking into account 共9兲,
2V共z,t兲
z 2
q
= − 关␦n p共z,t兲 − ␦nm共z,t兲兴,
共6兲 V0 Ⰶ U = VT 冏 1

+i
2 2
d
2D
coth 
d
2
冉 冊冏 , 共10兲
which are now linear. We look for solutions of Eqs. 共6兲 of the where VT = kBT / q is the thermal voltage. For a numerical
type ␦nr共z , t兲 = r共z兲exp共it兲 and V共z , t兲 = 共z兲exp共it兲. By analysis of the analysis presented above, we suppose that q
substituting these trial functions in Eqs. 共6兲, we get = 1.6⫻ 10−19 A s 共monovalent ions兲, N = 4.2⫻ 1020 m−3,
冉 冊
= 6.7⫻ 0, T = 300 K, d = 25 m, and S = 2 ⫻ 10−4 m2.9 With
qN
ir共z兲 = − D r⬙共z兲 ± ⬙共z兲 , these values for the physical parameters, relevant to a com-
k BT mercial 5CB nematic liquid crystal, the length of Debye is
⬃ 1.05⫻ 10−7 m. In Fig. 1 we show the frequency depen-
q
⬙共z兲 = − 关 p共z兲 − m共z兲兴. 共7兲 dence of U by assuming D p = Dm = 8.2⫻ 10−12 m2 / s.9 As it is
evident from this figure, in the limit of → 0, U tends to VT,
as expected. In fact, in this region the profile of the electric
Equations 共6兲 form a system of ordinary differential equa-
potential is given by the Poisson–Boltzmann equation, where
tions with constant coefficients. In the case under consider-
the thermal energy kBT is compared with the electrostatic
ation, where D p = Dm, the condition V共d / 2 , t兲 = −V共−d / 2 , t兲
energy qV. On the contrary, for large , U diverges as 1/2.
implies V共z , t兲 = −V共−z , t兲 and n p共z , t兲 = nm共−z , t兲. It follows By means of 共10兲 we get, in the limit of d Ⰷ , the asymptotic
that +共z兲 = −共−z兲. A standard analysis gives expressions
r共z兲 = ± p0 sinh共z兲,
j r = − Dr 冉 nr
±
q V
nr
z k BT z
. 冊 共12兲
冉 冊
dr共±d/2,t兲 1
q 1 − k1 1 − k2 = knr共±d/2,t兲 − r共±d/2,t兲, 共18兲
共z兲 = − C1 sinh共␥1z兲 + C2 sinh共␥2z兲 dt
␥21 ␥22
where k and are the adsorption coefficient and the desorp-
+ Az, 共14兲 tion time, respectively.13 In this framework, the profiles of
respectively, as it has been shown in Ref. 10 The integration the ionic densities and of the electrical potential across the
constants C1 , C2, and A are given by the boundary condi- sample are still given by 共8兲, where p0 and c follow from the
tions 共4兲 and 共5兲. In 共13兲 and 共14兲 the parameters ␥1 , ␥2 , k1, boundary conditions 共5兲, 共17兲, and 共18兲, and are
and k2 are
␥1,2 = 冑冉 1 1 1
冊 冑冋 冉 1 1 1
冊册 2
1
+ 4 共15兲
冋 1+
k
1 + i
tanh 冉 冊册
d
2
p0 − i
Nq/共kBT兲
共/D兲cosh共d/2兲
c = 0,
2 + 2 ± 2 − 2
2 ᐉ p ᐉm 2 ᐉ p ᐉm
冉 冊
4
q d d
and −2 sinh p0 + c = V0/2, 共19兲
2
冉 冊
2 2
1
k1,2 = − 22 ␥1,2
2
− , 共16兲 where N is now the bulk density of ions in the absence of an
ᐉ2p external electrical voltage, as discussed in Ref 12. By impos-
where ᐉ␣2 = 22 / 关1 + 2i共 / D␣兲2兴. By imposing again the ing, as in the previous cases, the condition 2兩r共z兲兩 Ⰶ N, we
condition 2兩r共z兲兩 Ⰶ N, we obtain the critical voltage U such obtain the critical voltage U such that the system under in-
that the system under investigation can be considered linear vestigation can be considered linear when V0 Ⰶ U. The result
when V0 Ⰶ U. The results of the numerical calculations are of the numerical calculations is reported in Fig. 3, by assum-
reported in Fig. 2, by assuming for the physical parameters ing for the physical parameters of the sample again the ones
of the sample again the ones reported above, and D p reported above, with D p = Dm = 8.2⫻ 10−12 m2 / s,9 k
= 10Dm = 8.2⫻ 10−11 m2 / s.11 Again, in the low-frequency = 10−6 m s−1 and = 0.1.13 As expected in the low-frequency
range U → VT, whereas for large , U increases as 冑, range U → VT. In the high-frequency range, U is still given
according to 共11兲, with D p or Dm. Hence, the critical voltage by 共11兲. The maximum deviation of the present U with re-
depends on the larger diffusion coefficient. spect to the one relevant to the case in which the adsorption
is absent takes place for a frequency ⬃ 1 / .
IV. CASE IN WHICH THE SURFACES ADSORB IONS
Finally, we can consider the case in which at the elec-
V. DISCUSSION
trodes there is adsorption of particles. In this case, by indi-
cating with r共±d / 2 , t兲, the surface density of adsorbed par- The important point in the analysis presented previously
ticles, instead of the boundary conditions 共4兲 we have now, is that in the problem under investigation there is an intrinsic
dr共±d/2,t兲 voltage U. For V0 Ⰶ U the system behaves in a linear manner,
jr共±d/2,t兲 = . 共17兲 and the concept of electrical impedance is useful. When the
dt
condition V0 Ⰶ U is not satisfied, the system behave in a non-
In the Langmuir’s approximation, linear way. This means that if V共±d / 2 , t兲 = ± 共V0 / 2兲exp共it兲,
113703-4 Barbero, Alexe-Ionescu, and Lelidis J. Appl. Phys. 98, 113703 共2005兲
q
2⬙共z兲 = 关 p,2共z兲 − m,2共z兲兴, 共23兲
with the boundary conditions at z = ± d / 2
2 = 0, r,2 ± 共qN/kBT兲关2⬘ + 共r,1/N兲1⬘兴 = 0. 共24兲
In the same manner it is possible to obtain the bulk differen-
tial equations and the boundary conditions for all h. By
means of r,h共z兲 and h共z兲 it is possible to evaluate the elec-
trical current in the external circuit I共t兲, and hence to deter-
mine the electrical impedance of the cell defined by Z
= V0 exp共it兲 / I共t兲. Since I共t兲 is not a harmonic function of t
with frequency f = / 共2兲, it follows that Z = Z共t兲. At this
point, knowing the accuracy of the used experimental setup,
it is possible to determine the maximum amplitude, VM , for
which the system under investigation does not behave in a
FIG. 3. The same as in Fig. 1, when the adsorption phenomenon is taken nonlinear manner. It is clear that this procedure is, in some
into account, in the Langmuir’s approximation, by assuming q = 1.6
⫻ 10−19 A s 共monovalent ions兲, N = 4.2⫻ 1020 m−3, = 6.7⫻ 0, T = 300 K, way, arbitrary, since it depends on the experimental setup.
d = 25 m, S = 2 ⫻ 10−4 m2, and D p = Dm = 8.2⫻ 10−12 m2 / s. In the low- and On the contrary, our analysis, based on the condition ␦nr
high-frequency ranges the critical voltage U is still given by 共11兲. The maxi- Ⰶ N, proves the existence of an intrinsic voltage with which
mum influence of the adsorption effect on U is localized around the fre-
it is necessary to compare the amplitude of the applied volt-
quency ⬃ 1 / . The continuous curve corresponds to the case where k
= 10−6 m s−1 and = 0.1 s, whereas the dotted line corresponds to the case in age.
which the adsorption phenomenon is absent. The logarithms are in base 10 In the discussion presented previously, we have consid-
and is in rad/ s. ered, for simplicity, the case in which the diffusion coeffi-
cients of the positive and negative ions are the same, and the
␦nr共z , t兲, and V共z , t兲 are not harmonic functions with fre- adsorption phenomenon is absent. However, a simple inspec-
quency f = / 共2兲. In this case ␦nr共z , t兲 and V共z , t兲 are of the tion shows that it is valid also in the case where D p ⫽ Dm and
type when the adsorption phenomenon is present.
␦nr共z,t兲 = 兺 r,h共z兲exp共iht兲,
h
VI. CONCLUSION
V共z,t兲 = 兺 h共z兲exp共iht兲, 共20兲 By means of a continuum model we have analyzed what
h
means “small voltage” in the impedance spectroscopy mea-
where r,1共z兲 = 共z兲 and 1共z兲 = 共z兲, introduced previously. surements on an electrolytic cell. Actually our analysis is of
It was possible to analyze the problem in a more techni- some interest for all systems in which the ionic contribution
cal way, according to the following scheme. By substituting to the total current is not negligible, as the liquid crystals.
expansions 共20兲 into 共1兲 and 共2兲 and into the boundary con- We have shown that, in the low-frequency range, the
ditions 共4兲 and 共5兲 one obtains a cascade of differential equa- applied voltage has to be small with respect to the thermal
tions and the relevant boundary conditions for r,h共z兲 and voltage VT = kBT / q. In the high-frequency region, the applied
h共z兲. For h = 1 the equations are voltage has to be small with respect to the critical voltage
冉 冊
diverging as the square root of the frequency. Our analysis
qN
⬙ 共z兲 ±
ir,1共z兲 = D r,1 ⬙共z兲 , has been performed by considering the case in which the
k BT 1 D p = Dm = D, as well as the case in which D p ⫽ Dm. We have
also considered the case in which the limiting surface of the
q liquid can absorb ions. The analysis presented in our paper is
1⬙共z兲 = − 关 p,1共z兲 − m,1共z兲兴, 共21兲
simple, however, it was not previously presented. The results
are rather important from an experimental point of view. In
where, as before, for r = p there is the sign +, and for r = m the
fact, as it has been stressed previously in this paper, the
sign −. Equations 共21兲 have to be solved with the boundary
impedance spectroscopy technique is meaningful only if it is
conditions at z = ± d / 2,
possible to define the electrical impedance of the cell under
1 = ± V0/2, ⬘ ± 共qN/kBT兲1 = 0,
r,1 共22兲 investigation. This implies that the system behaves as a lin-
ear system. If this condition is not satisfied, the analysis of
as we have done in Sec. II. For h = 2 one gets the experimental data is more complex, and it has to be done,
⬙ 共z兲 ±
2ir,2共z兲 = D r,2 冉 qN
⬙共z兲
k BT 2
冊 taking into account the nonlinear character of the system
under investigation. In recent papers devoted to the imped-
ance spectroscopy analysis of different systems the applied
Dq voltage to the cell cannot be considered small in the fre-
± 关r,1共z兲1⬘共z兲兴,
k BT quency range where the measurements are performed.11,14–16
113703-5 Barbero, Alexe-Ionescu, and Lelidis J. Appl. Phys. 98, 113703 共2005兲
7
Consequently, the systems cannot be considered as linear J. Israelachvili, Intermolecular Forces 共Academic, London, 1985兲, Chap.
systems, and some of the conclusions derived in Refs. 11 and 12.
8
G. Barbero and A. L. Alexe-Ionescu, Liq. Cryst. 32, 943 共2005兲.
14–16 could be not correct. 9
A. Sawada, K. Tarumi, and S. Naemura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 38,
1
1418 共1999兲.
J. Ross Macdonald, Impedance Spectroscopy 共Wiley, New York, 1987兲, 10
I. Lelidis and G. Barbero, Phys. Lett. A 343, 440 共2005兲.
Chap.1. 11
A. Sawada, K. Tarumi, and S. Naemura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 38,
2
J. Jamnik and J. Maier, J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 4183 共1999兲.
3 1423 共1999兲.
P. A. Cirkel, J. P. M. van der Ploeg, and G. J. M. Koper, Physica A 235, 12
G. Barbero, Phys. Rev. E 71, 062201 共2005兲.
269 共1997兲. 13
4
M. Scott, R. Paul, and K. V. I. S. Kalert, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 230, 377 B. Maximus, E. De Ley, A. De Meyere, and H. Pauwels, Ferroelectrics
共2000兲. 121, 103 共1991兲.
14
5
M. Scott, R. Paul, and K. V. I. S. Kalert, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 230, 388 A. D. Hollingsworth and D. A. Saville, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 257, 65
共2000兲. 共2003兲.
15
6
M. Z. Bazant, K. Thornton, and A. Ajadari, Phys. Rev. E 70, 021506 S. Murakami and H. Naito, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 36, 773 共1997兲.
16
共2004兲. S. Murakami, H. Iga, and H. Naito, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6396 共1996兲.