SBC PanchGochia ESR

SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT
CONSTRUCTION OF ESRs,GSRs,FEEDER PIPELINES,PUMPING

ARRANGEMENT AND ALLIED WORKS IN SAMBALPUR TOWN (PHASE II &
III)ZONE-4 OF SMC)(AMRUT/OD/SAMBALPUR/WS/39 &43)
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
CLIENT
P G CONSTRUCTION
114 MUKTI MARG DEWAS
MADHYA PRADESH
 GEO CONSULTANT
MAKS CONSULTANT
MC
A SOIL TESTING QUALITY CONTROL LAB.

Approved by Govt.of Odisha, Bhubaneswar.
An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Consultant firm.
PLOT NO-1937/9295, SATYAVIHAR, , N.H.-5
RASULGARH, BHUBANESWAR-751010, ODISHA,
Phone - (0674) 2579390 , 94371-06990
Email : maks_consultant@yahoo.com
SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ESRs,GSRs,FEEDER PIPELINES,PUMPING ARRANGEMENT AND ALLIED
WORKS IN SAMBALPUR TOWN (PHASE II & III)ZONE-4 OF SMC)(AMRUT/OD/SAMBALPUR/WS/39 &43)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SLNo PARTICULARS PAGE
1. INTRODUCTION 04
2. FIELD INVESTIGATION 04
3. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION 05
4. FIELD WORK 05
5. LABORATORY TEST 07
(GSR) MAITRI NAGAR (BH N0-01)

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 10
RECOMMENDATION 12
FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORE LOG PROFILE 13
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14
INDEX PROPERTIES 14
S.B.C. CALCULATIONS 15
CORE TEST RESULT 20
MAITRI NAGAR, PUMP HOUSE (BH N0-02)
RECOMMENDATION 24
BORE LOG PROFILE 25
INDEX PROPERTIES 26
CORE TEST RESULT 33
Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 2

.
(ESR) PANCHA GOCHHIA CHAKA (BH N0-03)
RECOMMENDATION 37
BORE LOG PROFILE 38
INDEX PROPERTIES 39
CORE TEST RESULT 46

INTRODUCTION
We feel our self-fortunate enough for investigating the sub- Construction Of

Esrs,Gsrs,Feeder Pipelines,Pumping Arrangement And Allied Works In Sambalpur Town
(Phase Ii & Iii)Zone-4 Of Smc)(Amrut/Od/Sambalpur/Ws/39 &43).The sub-soil
investigation works were taken up by Maks Consultant, Satyavihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.
The proposed project site was an undulated roughly level ground.
OBJECTIVES OF THIS SUB SOIL EXPLORATION
The objective of this Geo-technical investigation is to optimize the foundation system
for proposed Project with-in the safe bearing capacity of the soil and allowable settlement,
It consists of the following
 Determination of type, size and depth of foundation- system by analyzing the soil
properties
 To suggest a conclusive recommendation for the type of foundation system to be
adopted which would be economically viable and structurally safe for the proposed
structures of the projects at the proposed site.
Limitations of Investigation
The scope of Geo-technical exploration is confined within the framework of
agreement and Technical specification of the client. All the field and laboratory experiments
has been carried out as per the relevant Indian Standard Code of practice. However the
direction of Engineer-in-charge of the Client has been given due emphasis.
Nature of investigation work
The over all investigation consists of the following:
i. Visual reconnaissance of the site.
ii. Field Work-boring borehole and collection of soil and core samples
iii. Laboratory experiments, determination of soil parameters.
iv. Decision on foundation system to be adopted in the present case using Our
Engineering judgment, based on the current practice.
The detailed Geo-technical investigation work that was carried out consists of two parts.
1. Field investigation, it consists of
 Location: Three numbers of bore holes with due consultation with Chief
Authority of client.
 Boring / drilling up to 15.0 m. below N.G.L
 Conducting standard penetration test at the locations @ 1.5m interval.
 Collecting SPT from the Boreholes.
 Observation of the depth of water table in the boreholes.

2. Laboratory investigation it consists of
(i) For Soil

 Grain size analysis.
 Determination of Bulk/dry density.
 Determination of void ratio.
 Determination of soil moisture content
 Determination of liquid limit.
 Determination of plastic limit
 Determination of specific gravity
 DFS Test.
(ii) For Rock
Compressive Strength.
FIELD WORK
1. SELECTION OF BOREHOLE
Three numbers of Bore-holes has been selected by the Engineer in charge in order to
obtain comprehensive sub-soil data for this site with a provision of borings up to 15.0
meters depth.
(I) BORING:
It is the main part of sub- soil investigation work as the soil samples were collected
for different tests at different levels. The sub-soil exploration work at the proposed site was
carried out by wash boring per IS: 1892 – 1979 .
2. STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS:

Standard penetration test plays a major role in sub- soil investigation
determination of safe bearing capacity of soil in non cohesive type soil ,particularly in non-
cohesive granular sandy soil and where the UDS could not be collected either due to non
cohesive nature of soil .The SPT tests were conducted as per IS: 2131-1981 respectively,
in different levels of the bore hole in a continuous manner using spilt-spoon samplers at
locations . The SPT sampler was lower inside the borehole after drilling the required level
and is driven by a 65.00 kg. Hammer with a free fall of 750 mm. driving 450 mm in three
stages 150 mm each and the number of blows for each 150mm penetration for 2 nd& 3rd 150
mm drive recorded as “N”. Refusal were considered for N>50.

4. COLLECTION OF SOIL SAMPLES

4.i. SPT Samples
For investigation Standard Penetration Tests conducted at different 1.50 m intervals
or at change of soil strata as per of IS; code in the bore hole & samples were collected for
laboratory analysis.
4.ii. Disturbed soil Samples

Disturbed representative soil samples in sufficient quantity from the borehole has been
collected at 1.50 m. interval for different tests. The soil samples collected were stored in
Polyethylene bags with proper sign and identification.

LABORATORY TESTS
The laboratory-tests were conducted on selected representative disturbed soil
samples collected from the Borehole drilled were at the proposed site. The tests include
Grain size analysis, Natural moisture content, D.F.S, Specific Gravity and Liquid limit, Plastic
limit, Plasticity index, Particles size distribution and compressive st. tests on representative
samples were also carried out. All the tests conducted confirming to the requirements of I.S
specification in the Laboratory approved by Govt. of Orissa. The results of all these tests
have been annexed separately.
1. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS:

The grain size analysis of different soil samples were done as per the requirement of
IS: 2720 (Pt-IV) 1985 – method of test for soil Grain size analysis.
The details of the test results has been shown test result sheet separately.
2. NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT:
The natural moisture content were determined from different soil samples of the
Borehole at different depths as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973: The results of all these tests has
been annexed separately.
3. DETERMINATION OF BULK DENSITY:
The Bulk densities has been determined from different soil samples of the Borehole at
different depths in the laboratory from the soil samples as per IS: 2720(Pt-II)-1973.
4. DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC GRAVITY:
The specific gravity of the soil samples has been determined at different levels as per
IS: 2720(Pt-III)-1980. The result of all these tests has been annexed separately.

SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT FOR WATER SUPPLY TO RAJKISHOREPADA & ADJOINING AREAS (WARD NO. 1 , 2 ,18 &
19 ) OF ANGUL MUNICIPALITY UNDER STATE ACTION PLAN 2017-18.
5. LIQUID-LIMIT / PLASTIC LIMIT: The liquid and plastic limits of soils has been
determined as per the relevant as per IS: 2720(Pt-v)-1985 Code of practice. The results of
all these tests have been annexed separately.
6. DIFFERENTIAL FREE SWELL TEST:

The tests were conducted as per IS: 2720 (Part-40
& 41) 1977. It deals with the method of test for the
determination of free swell index of soil. Free swell is the
increase in volume of a soil without any external
constraints due to swelling of clays .It can be identified
at the outset by an investigation of those soils likely to
posse’s undesirable expansion characteristics. The results of all these tests has been
annexed separately.

CONSTRUCTION OF ESR
AT-PANCHA GOCHHIA CHAKA
(BH N0-03)

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA

(ESR)PANCHA GOCHHIA CHAKA
(BH N0-03
One number of Bore hole up to 15.0 meter depth below NGL were drilled to
determine the comprehensive soil data from test results in a realistic manner. From the
laboratory study of soil properties such as Grain Size Analysis, DFS Test, Specific Gravity,
S.M.C. and Waterberg’s limits shows a consistently increasing trend with depth. The average
values of the index parameters are shown below.
PLASTICITY
SPECIFIC
DFS IN %
GRAVITY
DENSITY
NMC IN %
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
%
1 Maximum value 17.8 2.72 1.92 31.8 21.0 10.8 18.0
2 Minimum value 11.0 2.64 1.83 28.8 20.0 10.0 0.0
3 Average Value 14.4 2.68 1.875 30.3 20.5 10.4 9.0
35 30.3
30
25 20.5
20
14.4
15 10.4 9.0
10
5 2.68 1.875
0
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS IN %
GRAVITY [gm/cc] % INDEX
Maximum value Minimum value Average Value
In this bore hole it was seen that three layers i.e clay , Poorly graded gravell-silty-
sandy clay & Soft rocky strata has seen from top soil level up to explored depth of 10.0 mtr
depth. It was seen that a very loose , high cohesive, high plasticity &high swelling clay soil
is continuing from 0.0 mtr to 6.40 mtr depth. Where the UDS sample was collected at-
4.50mtr depth and the N values at 1.5, 3.0 & 6.0 mtr are 4, 5, & 8. But below 6.40 mtr depth
a medium compacted, low swelling & medium plasti city poorly graded gravel –silty sand-
clay is continuing up to 7.20 mtr deph. Where the N value at 6.50 mtr is 18. (The details of
soil layer have been mention in Field bore log chart).
The SPT values “N” has exceed the limiting value of 50 in this bore hole at 7.50 mtr
depth. The N values show regular trend with different depth of bore hole. The DFS Values of

bore hole soil samples are high to very high. The allowable S. B. C of soil strata has been
computed at different depth using SPT value “N” , C, Phi and index parameters as per the
requirements of IS: 2131 & 6403 – 1981 considering the circular type foundation at
different depths are shown graphically below.
DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

45 41.005
40 36.362
33.066
35
SBC IN MT/SQM
30
25
20 14.966
15 11.605
10
5
0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 11.605 14.966 36.362 33.066 41.005
DEPTH IN METER
SBC
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 11.605 ,14.966 ,36.362 33.066 & 41.005
MT/sqm at 1.5 , 3.0 , 4.5 ,6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing
NGL respectively.
 The SBC values of the area located nearby bore hole may be judiciously considered for
the design requirements.

RECOMMENDATIONS
(BH N0-03
Analyzing the soil parameters from different angles it is recommended that:
 The Safe Bearing Capacity of soil are 11.605 ,14.966 ,36.362 33.066 & 41.005
MT/sqm at 1.5 , 3.0 , 4.5 ,6.0 & 7.5 mtr depth from the lowest level of the existing
NGL respectively.
 Circular footing foundation with minimum Width size 8.0 mtr (Dia) has been
considered for computing the SBC value.
 From the analysis of the test result it is suggested that the type of foundation and
dimension of the footing for the proposed structure may be decided at the design
level ascertaining the test result of the bore hole presented in the test report.
 The effect of Wind, Earth-quake Land-Slide (possibility) if any should considered for
heavy structure.

RECORD OF BORING
(BH N0-03
Description of Thickness of Depth Type of Nos. No. of blows N. Value Ground

Strata. stratum. from sample related to depth water
Ground of penetration. level.
Surface In Mtr.
UDS SPT 15cm 15cm 15cm
0.0
Well graded --------------------

gravell-silty-
1.5 - S/DS 01 3 5 8 13
sandy-clay
3.0 - S/DS 02 4 6 9 15
4.5 - S/DS 03 15 18 20 38
4.50 M
6.0 - S/DS 04 20 20 22 42
6.50
--------------------
Sandy Stone
7.5 - S/DS 05 24 - - N>50
----------------- 8.80 - - - - - -
D I Rock
9.0 - S/DS 06 22 - - N>50
10.5 - S/DS 07 30 - - N>50
--------------------- 11.50 - - 08 - - - --
Soft Rock
Core
12.0 - - 09 - - - Collected
Core
13.0 - - 10 - - - Collected
Core
14.0 - - 11 - - - Collected
Core
15.0 - - 12 - - - Collected

SIEVE ANALYSIS
(BH N0-03
BH SAMPLE % by wt. passing through different I.S. sieve
No. REFERENCE
10mm 4.75mm 2.0mm 425 micron 75 micron
1 1.5
98.45 88.74 74.6 59.3 46.32
1 3.0
92.46 89.55 83.34 68.54 36.97
1 4.5
98.0 94.54 88.75 56.24 37.05
1 6.0
97.34 95.19 92.03 71.19 32.56
INDEX PROPERTIES
BH Sample F.M.C. in Bulk density L.L. in P.L. IN P.I. in D.F.S. in Sp. Gravity of
No. reference % in Gm/cc % % % % soil
1 1.5 17.8 1.83 31.8 21.0 10.8 18.0 2.64

1 3.0 17.2 1.84 30.5 20.2 10.3 16.0 2.65
1 4.5 16.8 1.86 30.0 20.0 10.0 15.0 2.66
1 6.0 16.8 1.86 29.8 - NP 15.0 2.66
1 7.5 12.3 1.89 28.8 - NP 0.0 2.69
1 9.0 11.0 1.91 - - - 0.0 2.72
1 10.5 11.0 1.92 - - - 0.0 2.72
PLASTICIT
NMC IN %
SPECIFIC
DFS IN %
GRAVITY
DENSITY
PLASTIC
[gm/cc]
LIQUID
INDEX
LIMIT
LIMIT
BULK
Y
1 Maximum value 17.8 2.72 1.92 31.8 21.0 10.8 18.0
2 Minimum value 11.0 2.64 1.83 28.8 20.0 10.0 0.0
3 Average Value 14.4 2.68 1.875 30.3 20.5 10.4 9.0
35 31.8
30
25 28.8 21.0
17.8 18.0
20
15 20.0
10.8
10
11 2.72 10.0
5 1.92
0 2.64 1.83
NMC IN % SPECIFIC BULK DENSITY LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT PLASTICITY DFS0I.N
0 %
GRAVITY [gm/cc] % INDEX
Maximum value Minimum value

SBC CALCULATION
(BH N0-03
DEPTH IN
SBC IN MT/M2
METER
1.5 11.605
3.0 14.966
4.5 36.362
6.0 33.066
7.5 41.005
DEPTH ~SBC PLOT
45 41.005
40 36.362
33.066
SBC IN MT/SQM
35
30
25
20 14.966
15 11.605
10
5
0
1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 7.5
SBC 11.605 14.966 36.362 33.066 41.005
DEPTH IN METER SBC
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM THE FIELD SPT VALUE OF THE FOUNDATION SOIL MAT AT 1.50 M DEPTH
OF B.H NO-3
Width of footing= B= 8.0 m

Field SPT value (N Value)= 13
Depth = 1.50 m
Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 0.067 X 13 = 0.871 Kg/Cm²
CNc sc dc ic = Cu X 5.14 X sc X ic X dc in Kg / cm² .. (As per IS 6403-
qd =
1981)
So qd= 0.871 X 5.14 X 1 X 1.04 X 1
= 4.647 Kg/Cm²
In case of Local shear failure
q'd = 3.098
3.098 ....
NSBC= (Considering 3.0 as a factor of safety)
3.00
= 1.033 Kg/Cm² = 10.3268 T/m2

Liquid limit in % (LL) = 31.8
CC= 0.009 (WL-10) where WL= LL …(As per IS 8009-1976 part I)
So CC= 0.009 ( 32 -10 )
= 0.196
Voidrati = CC= 0.30 (eo-0.27) ... (As per IS 8009-1976 part I)

eo = (CC / 0.3) + 0.27
= ( 0.196 / 0.3) + 0.27
= 0.924 (Loose)
Submersible density бD = ý = (G-1)ϒw / (1+e)
When G = Specific gravity
= 2.64
e =Voidratio (CC) = 0.924
= ( 2.64 -1 X 1 ) / ( 1+ 0.924 )
= 0.852 gms/cc
Over burden pressure = ( 0.852 X 150 ) / 1000
= 0.1279 Kg/Cm²
SBC= ( 3.098 /3.0 ) + 0.1279
= 1.161 Kg/Cm²
SBC= 11.605 T/m2 NSBC= 10.327 T/m2

OF B.H NO-3

Depth = 3.00 m
Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 0.067 X 15 = 1.005 Kg/Cm²
qd =
1981)
So qd= 1.005 X 5.14 X 1 X 1.08 X 1
= 5.553 Kg/Cm²
q'd = 3.702
3.702 ....
3.00
= 1.234 Kg/Cm² = 12.3403 T/m2

So CC= 0.009 ( 31 -10 )
= 0.185
Voidrati = CC= 0.30 (eo-0.27).... (As per IS 8009-1976 part I)

eo = (CC / 0.3) + 0.27
= ( 0.185 / 0.3) + 0.27
= 0.885 (Loose)
= 2.65
= ( 2.65 -1 X 1 ) / ( 1+ 0.885 )
= 0.875 gms/cc
= 0.2626 Kg/Cm²
SBC= ( 3.702 /3.0 ) + 0.2626
= 1.497 Kg/Cm²
SBC= 14.966 T/m2 NSBC= 12.340 T/m2

OF B.H NO-3

Depth = 4.50 m
Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 0.067 X 38 = 2.546 Kg/Cm²
CNc sc dc ic = Cu X 5.14 X sc X ic X dc in Kg / cm² ... (As per IS 6403-
qd =
1981)
So qd= 2.546 X 5.14 X 1 X 1.11 X 1
= 14.565 Kg/Cm²
q'd = 9.710
9.710 ....
3.00
= 3.237 Kg/Cm² = 32.3671 T/m2

So CC= 0.009 ( 30 -10 )
= 0.180

eo = (CC / 0.3) + 0.27
= ( 0.180 / 0.3) + 0.27
= 0.870 (Loose)
= 2.66
= ( 2.66 -1 X 1 ) / ( 1+ 0.870 )
= 0.888 gms/cc
= 0.3995 Kg/Cm²
SBC= ( 9.710 /3.0 ) + 0.3995
= 3.636 Kg/Cm²
SBC= 36.362 T/m2 NSBC= 32.367 T/m2

OF B.H NO-3

Depth = 6.00 m
Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 0.067 X 42 = 2.814 Kg/Cm²
qd =
1981)
So qd= 2.814 X 5.14 X 1 X 1.15 X 1
= 16.634 Kg/Cm²
q'd = 11.089
11.089 ....
4.00
= 2.772 Kg/Cm² = 27.7226 T/m2

So CC= 0.009 ( 30 -10 )
= 0.178

eo = (CC / 0.3) + 0.27
= ( 0.178 / 0.3) + 0.27
= 0.864 (Loose)
= 2.66
= ( 2.66 -1 X 1 ) / ( 1+ 0.864 )
= 0.891 gms/cc
= 0.5343 Kg/Cm²
SBC= ( 11.089 /4.0 ) + 0.5343
= 3.307 Kg/Cm²
SBC= 33.066 T/m2 NSBC= 27.723 T/m2

OF B.H NO-3

Depth = 7.50 m
Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 0.067 X 50 = 3.350 Kg/Cm²
CNc sc dc ic = Cu X 5.14 X sc X ic X dc in Kg / cm².. (As per IS 6403-
qd =
1981)
So qd= 3.350 X 5.14 X 1 X 1.19 X1
= 20.456 Kg/Cm²
q'd = 13.637
13.637
NSBC= ...(Considering 4.0 as a factor of safety)
4.00
= 3.409 Kg/Cm² = 34.0936 T/m2

So CC= 0.009 ( 29 -10 )
= 0.169
Voidrati = CC= 0.30 (eo-0.27) ...(As per IS 8009-1976 part I)

eo = (CC / 0.3) + 0.27
= ( 0.169 / 0.3) + 0.27
= 0.834 (Loose)
= 2.69
= ( 2.69 -1 X 1 ) / ( 1+ 0.834 )
= 0.921 gms/cc
= 0.6911 Kg/Cm²
SBC= ( 13.637 /4.0 ) + 0.6911
= 4.100 Kg/Cm²
SBC= 41.005 T/m2 NSBC= 34.094 T/m2

CORE TEST RESULT

BH-3
BH NO Depth Dia. Of core in Height of Compressive strength in Remarks
In cm core in cm Kg/ Sq.cm
Mtr. 72 Hours immersion in Average compressive
water strength =
5.00 5.50 60.6 60.0 Kg/ cm2
11.50-13.0 5.00 5.50 62.3 Applying a factor of

safety of 8 the
5.00 5.60 60.8 compressive strength
3
5.00 5.60 59.5 can be considered for
design purpose
13.0-15.0 5.00 5.50 61.3 = 7.5 Kg/ cm2
5.00 5.60 55.5 = 75.0 T/ m2
Average compressive strength 60.0

SBC PanchGochia ESR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

SBC PanchGochia ESR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SBC PanchGochia ESR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

CONSTRUCTION OF ESRs,GSRs,FEEDER PIPELINES,PUMPING

A SOIL TESTING QUALITY CONTROL LAB.

(GSR) MAITRI NAGAR (BH N0-01)

FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

BORE LOG PROFILE 13

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 14

CORE TEST RESULT 20

MAITRI NAGAR, PUMP HOUSE (BH N0-02)

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 22

FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

BORE LOG PROFILE 25

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 26

CORE TEST RESULT 33

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 2

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA 35

FIELD/LABORATORY TEST RESULTS

BORE LOG PROFILE 38

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS 39

CORE TEST RESULT 46

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 3

We feel our self-fortunate enough for investigating the sub- Construction Of

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 4

2. Laboratory investigation it consists of

(i) For Soil

2. STANDARD PENETRATION TESTS:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 5

4. COLLECTION OF SOIL SAMPLES

4.ii. Disturbed soil Samples

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 6

1. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 7

6. DIFFERENTIAL FREE SWELL TEST:

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 8

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 9

ANALYSIS OF SUB SOIL STRATA

Maximum value Minimum value Average Value

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 10

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 11

Analyzing the soil parameters from different angles it is recommended that:

considered for computing the SBC value.

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 12

Description of Thickness of Depth Type of Nos. No. of blows N. Value Ground

Well graded --------------------

10.5 - S/DS 07 30 - - N>50

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 13

1 1.5 17.8 1.83 31.8 21.0 10.8 18.0 2.64

1 4.5 16.8 1.86 30.0 20.0 10.0 15.0 2.66

1 6.0 16.8 1.86 29.8 - NP 15.0 2.66

1 7.5 12.3 1.89 28.8 - NP 0.0 2.69

1 9.0 11.0 1.91 - - - 0.0 2.72

1 10.5 11.0 1.92 - - - 0.0 2.72

Maks Consultant, Bhubaneswar. 14

DEPTH ~SBC PLOT

Width of footing= B= 8.0 m

Cu= 0.067 X N' in Kg / cm² [N' = N]

= 1.033 Kg/Cm² = 10.3268 T/m2