Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Cases: Product Management & Product Marketing For Technology-Based Products
Business Cases: Product Management & Product Marketing For Technology-Based Products
Business cases
◼ Forecasting
◼ He is concerned because it has been produced by a new product manager who may
not be very experienced with business cases
Summary of
key points
Common
◼ Identify stakeholders
◼ Get a sponsor
Submit documents 24 21 21 18 16
Review meeting 14 14 11 9
Decision confirmation 19 19 16 14
Finance Marketing
Understand if they:
- need to provide input
- are part of the sign-off
Professional
Procurement - have any history with it
services
- care about it or object to it
Project Customer
management support
Internal IT
systems
Technical
Proposition
Approach Timing Company
strategy &
Target Cost Revenue portfolio
markets estimates
CAPEX vs OPEX?
◼ How much was spent worldwide on coffee pods and capsules in 2017? (retail sales
revenue in US$)
Region Population
(2016, Million)
Africa 1,225
Asia 4,462
Europe 741
South America, 637
Central America, and
the Caribbean
North America 358
Oceania 40
Source : Wikipedia
World Total 7,463
◼ Talk to relevant sales channels to get a view of the sales they believe they could
make
Try and sanity check if the figures would be the same if they were added to their sales targets ☺
◼ Extend the forecast based on the requirements of customers with a similar profile
◼ Macro trends
Market size ◼ Purchase / re-purchase frequency
◼ Talk about the risks that are most ◼ Explain how you will deal with each of
likely and that have the highest the risks you document - what are
impact your mitigation plans?
2
High 1
3
Reduce Accept
Likelihood
6 5
Transfer Avoid
Low
Low High
Impact
◼ But this isn’t enough. Decision makers know that no-one can predict the future, so
they need to:
Be enthused by the project potential
Trust that the delivery team will overcome the problems that every project encounters
Net Present Value (NPV) and Typically only seen on business cases that span 3 years or
Internal Rate of Return (IRR) more. It is used to compare the timing of when profits are
generated by different investments e.g. over 5 years does
most profit come toward the end of the 5 years or early in the
life of the product?
Earnings Before Interest and Used to compare performance for products in more complex
Tax / Depreciation and situations e.g. for a multinational operating in different tax
Amortisation (EBIT or EBITDA) jurisdictions or for mergers and acquisitions
e.g. Product with annual revenue of €1m, COGS of €650k and fixed & apportioned costs of €100k
Gross profit = €1000k - €650k = €350k Gross margin = 350k /1000k = 35%
Net profit = €1000k – [€650k + €100k] = €250k Net margin = 250k /1000k = 25%
◼ The NPV and IRR indicate the size of payback on a product or project and takes into
account the ‘time value of money’
£90
£80
£70
◼ EBITDA stands for Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization
In business cases, it’s another way of comparing the profitability of different projects without
worrying about company-wide accountancy and financing expenses
These expenses are paying interest on loans, any tax due, and the standard accounting
practice of writing-off the value of assets over their useful lifetime
For tangible assets, such as PCs, this writing-off of value is called depreciation, and for
intangible assets, such as Intellectual Property, it’s called amortization
◼ Or if…
Sales achieve double forecast volume
A new supplier brings down costs
We launch early
◼ Not all elements in the business case analysis carry equal weight
Metric Worst Case Expected Case Best Case Most Likely Case
Gross
NPV Profit £10m x 20% £30m x 60% £40m x 20% £28m
£28m
+15% -5%
Cost change
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Gross Profit (£m)
Setup for success Pull together your investment case Tell a compelling story
Culture
- The opportunity
- The approach
Infographics
Business case contents
◼ It’s as much about the ‘story’ and assumptions as it is about the numbers
◼ Only submit your business case when it makes market, financial and technical
sense – credibility and believability are everything
◼ New market and product so high risk but no risks are articulated! Also, no statement about why we’ll have
credibility with customers as a supplier
◼ The development estimate is based on an initial high-level investigation – there has been no detailed work
◼ 22-month payback is risky given we have no insight on how competitors will react
◼ 3 months' timescale to deliver – very unlikely given contracts not finalized and integration with billing and
provisioning systems is required
◼ The forecast is unbelievable - immediate & substantial revenue followed by a slow ramp-up, and then a sudden
hike in Year 3 - plus the actual no. of sales is not shown
◼ The presentation of the figures doesn’t include any sensitivity analysis or NPV figure to represent the time value
of money over the 3 years
◼ Mathematical error – the £10m in Year 3, Q4 is suspiciously round! (actual figure should be £7.7m)