Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1922 W.B Halliday Review of Margaret Murray's Witch-Cult in Western Europe
1922 W.B Halliday Review of Margaret Murray's Witch-Cult in Western Europe
shall find myself written down in her black books in the good
company of Reginald Scot as an unscientific sceptic. But Miss
Murray has laid herself open to an obvious retort. If quota-
tions taken from their context may give rise to misleading
interpretations, still more misleading is the treatment of a series
of documents torn from the background of their own age and
divorced from the serious study of their immediate historical
antecedents. For obvious reasons, before propounding a theory
of the origin of the superstitions connected with witchcraft
couched in terms of a nebulous and hypothetical primitive
religion, it is the duty of the investigator to make some attempt
to master the historical development of medieval thought and
superstition and the late classical ideas upon which they were
largely based.
Upon general grounds the supposition that an organised cult
of primeval antiquity survived into the seventeenth century
A.D. without attracting the notice of any previous historian is
one which is not easy to take upon trust. We are told that such
a religion existed and that it was a fertility-cult, but its outlines
are quite indeterminate. The two classical references given
have no evidential value, and for detail we are, in fact, referred
1 Petronius, Sat. 63.
Reviews. 225
226 Reviews.
Reviews. 227
228 Reviews.
Reviews. 229g
230 Reviews.
theory which
which may
may be
be found
found inin Nider's
Nider's Formicarium.l
Formicarium.l Broom-
Broom-
sticks, again,
again, and
and their
their magical
magical useuse carry
carry usus back
back beyond
beyond thethe
Middle Ages
Ages toto Lucian
Lucian 22 and
and the
the flying
flying ointment
ointment toto Apuleius.3
Apuleius.3
Itis pleasant
pleasant toto have
have an
an analysis
analysis ofof the
the latter
latter and
and totolearn
learn itsits
physiological properties;
physiological properties; but
but more
more entertaining
entertaining still
stillwould
would it it
be to learn
learn the
the prescription
prescription for
for that
that which
which Fotis
Fotis gave
gave totoLucius
Lucius
by mistake
mistake for
for it.it.
W. R. HALLIDAY.