Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D6728-16 Spectroil - Determination Contaminants
D6728-16 Spectroil - Determination Contaminants
D6728-16 Spectroil - Determination Contaminants
1
D6728 − 16
3.1.6 emission spectroscopy, n—measurement of energy cance of contamination and trace metals are detailed in
spectrum emitted by or from an object under some form of Specifications D2880 and D975.
energetic stimulation; for example, light, electrical discharge, 5.1.1 Pre-conditioning of the fuel before it reaches the gas
and so forth. turbine or diesel engine has become a prerequisite for instal-
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard: lations that use heavy petroleum fuel, and also for sites that use
3.2.1 arc discharge, n—a self-sustaining, high current light distillate fuel oils. On-site fuel analysis to determine the
density, high temperature discharge uniquely characterized by extent of contamination is an integral part of a fuel quality
a cathode fall nearly equal to the ionization potential of the gas management program. It is used first to determine the extent of
or vapor in which it exists. the required treatment, and later, the effectiveness of the
treatment. It starts with the delivery of the fuel, continues
3.2.2 check sample, n—a reference material usually pre- throughout fuel handling and ends only as the fuel is injected
pared by a single laboratory for its own use as a measurement into the turbine or engine.
control standard, or for the qualification of a measurement 5.1.2 Fuel contamination specifications vary among the
method. different gas turbine manufacturers. However, without
3.2.3 contaminant, n—material in a fuel sample that may exception, each requires that contaminants must be as low as
cause ash deposition or high temperature corrosion. possible. In most power generation installations, it is the owner
3.2.4 graphite disc electrode, n—a soft form of the element who has the responsibility of verifying fuel cleanliness in
carbon manufactured into the shape of a disc for use as an compliance with the turbine manufacturer’s warranty specifi-
electrode in arc/spark spectrometers for oil and fuel analysis. cations. This leads to an on-site analytical instrument perfor-
3.2.5 graphite rod electrode, n—a soft form of the element mance requirement of below 1.0 mg ⁄kg for several elements.
carbon manufactured into the shape of a rod for use as a 6. Interferences
counter electrode in arc/spark spectrometers for oil and fuel
6.1 Spectral—Most spectral interferences can be avoided by
analysis.
judicious choice of spectral lines. High concentrations of some
3.2.6 profiling, n—to set the actual position of the entrance elements can have an interfering influence on the spectral lines
slit to produce optimum measurement intensity. used for determining trace levels of contaminants. Instrument
3.2.7 standardization, n—the process of reestablishing and manufacturers usually compensate for spectral interferences
correcting a calibration curve through the analysis of at least during factory calibration. A background correction system,
two known oil standards. which subtracts unwanted intensities on the side of the spectral
3.2.8 uptake rate, n—the amount of oil or fuel sample that is line, shall also be used for this purpose. When spectral
physically carried by the rotating disc electrode into the arc for interferences cannot be avoided with spectral line selection and
analysis. background correction, the necessary corrections shall be made
using the computer software supplied by the instrument manu-
4. Summary of Test Method facturer.
4.1 A fuel test specimen is excited by a controlled arc 6.2 Viscosity Effects—Differences in viscosity of fuel
discharge using the rotating disk technique. The radiant ener- samples will cause differences in uptake rates. Internal refer-
gies of selected analytical lines and a reference are collected ences of the instrument will compensate for a portion of the
and stored by way of photomultiplier tubes, charge coupled differences. Without a reference, the analysis will be adversely
devices, or other suitable detectors. A comparison is made of affected if the test specimen has a different viscosity from the
the emitted intensities of the elements in the fuel test specimen calibration samples. The hydrogen 486.10 nm spectral line
against those measured with calibration standards. The concen- shall be used for light fuels, and the CN 387.10 nm spectral
tration of the elements present in the fuel test specimen are line shall be used for heavy fuels as an internal reference to
calculated and displayed. compensate for viscosity effects.
6.3 Particulate—When large particles over 10 µm in size
5. Significance and Use are present, the analytical results will be lower than the actual
5.1 Operating experience of gas turbines and diesel engines concentration they represent. Large particles may not be
has shown that some of the ash-forming substances present in effectively transported by the rotating disk electrode sample
a fuel can lead to high temperature corrosion, ash deposition, introduction system into the arc, nor will they be fully
and fuel system fouling. Ash-forming materials may be in a vaporized.
fuel as oil-soluble metallo-organic compounds as water-soluble 7. Apparatus
salts or as solid foreign contamination. Their presence and
concentration varies with the geographical source of a crude oil 7.1 Electrode Sharpener—An electrode sharpener to re-
and they are concentrated in the residual fractions during the move the contaminated portion of the rod electrode remaining
refining process. Although distillate fuel oils are typically from the previous determination. It also forms a new 160°
contaminant free, ash-forming materials may be introduced angle on the end of the electrode.
later in the form of salt-bearing water or by contact with other 7.2 Rotating Disc Electrode Atomic Emission
petroleum products during transportation and storage. Specifi- Spectrometer—A simultaneous spectrometer consisting of ex-
cations of gas turbine and diesel engine fuels and the signifi- citation source, polychromator optics, and readout system.
2
D6728 − 16
TABLE 1 Elements and Recommended Wavelengths
Element Wavelength, Element Wavelength, nm
nm
Aluminum 308.21 Magnesium 280.20, 518.36
Calcium 393.37 Nickel 341.48
Chromium 425.43 Potassium 766.49
Copper 324.75 Silicon 251.60
Iron 259.94 Sodium 588.99
Lead 283.31 Vanadium 290.88, 437.92
Lithium 670.78 Zinc 213.86
Manganese 403.07
FIG. 1 Graphite Counter Electrode
3
D6728 − 16
shall be vigorously shaken with a power mixer after being in handling. Cleaning procedures recommended by the manufac-
the ultrasonic bath and prior to pouring a test specimen for turer shall be followed to avoid cross contamination or buildup
analysis. The bath temperature shall be 60 °C for very viscous of spilled sample.
fuels and below the flash point of non viscous fuels. The total 13.2 Number of Analysis per Specimen—Fuel samples shall
agitation time for a sample should be at least 2 min. be analyzed three times by repeating the procedure in 13.1. The
10.3 Specimen Holders—Fuel samples and oil standards 20 % rule is used to reject one of the three analyses if it differs
shall be poured into a specimen holder of at least 1 mL capacity more than 20 % from the average of the others. At concentra-
prior to analysis. Exercise care to pour the sample consistently tions below 1 mg ⁄kg, samples that differ more than 0.3 mg ⁄kg
to the same level in the specimen holders. can be rejected. Repeat the procedures in 13.1 until three
10.4 Specimen Table—The specimen table shall be adjusted similar analyses are obtained.
so that when it is in the full raised position, at least one-third 13.3 Analysis of Flammable Samples—A non-plastic speci-
of the disc electrode diameter is immersed in the oil test men holder cover shall be used on the specimen holder when
specimen. fuel samples that might catch on fire during the analysis are
analyzed. The cover retards flaming that may attenuate the
11. Preparation of Apparatus analytical signal. Most covers will fit on reusable or disposable
11.1 Warm-up Burns—If the instrument has been idle for specimen holders.
several hours, it may be necessary to conduct warm-up burns to 13.4 Quality Control with a Check Sample—Analyze a
stabilize the excitation source. The warm-up procedure can be check sample at least every hour during continuous operation
performed with any fuel sample or standard. Consult the or every 25 samples during intermittent operation to confirm
manufacturer’s instructions for specific warm-up requirements. the performance of the instrument.
11.2 Optical Profile—Perform the normal optical profile 13.4.1 When Quality Control (QC)/Quality Assurance (QA)
procedure called for in the operation manual of the instrument. protocols are already established, the check sample can be used
Optical profile shall also be performed if the instrument has to confirm the reliability of the test result.
been inoperative for an extended period of time or if the 13.4.2 When there is no QC/QA protocol established, Ap-
temperature has shifted more than 10 °C since the last calibra- pendix X1 can be used as the QC/QA system.
tion check. 14. Report
11.3 Validation Check—A go/no go standardization check 14.1 Fuel Samples—Fuel samples shall be reported as an
can be performed with one or more check samples or quality average of three separate analyses made on the same sample.
control samples to confirm calibration prior to the analysis of Data shall be in mg/kg and to one decimal place for concen-
routine samples. A calibration standard or fuel sample with trations below 99.9 mg ⁄kg and in whole numbers for concen-
known contaminant concentration can be used for this purpose. trations greater than 100 mg ⁄kg.
The optical profile and standardization routine recommended
by the instrument manufacturer shall be performed if the 15. Precision and Bias
validation check fails to meet the accuracy guidelines for each 15.1 Precision—The precision of this test method was
element as described in Appendix X1. determined by statistical analysis of interlaboratory results
obtained by following this test method. A total of seven
12. Calibration laboratories participated in the Interlaboratory Study (ILS) and
12.1 Factory Calibration—The operational range for each sent in data on twelve fuel samples and standards analyzed in
element is established through the analysis of organometallic duplicate in accordance with the procedure described in 13.1 –
standards at known concentrations. A calibration curve for each 13.4. The samples in the ILS consisted of distillate fuel oils,
element is established and correction factors are set to produce crude oil, residual fuels and calibration standards. Data is
a linear response. Analyses of test specimens must be per- available in a research report.3
formed within the linear range of response. 15.1.1 Repeatability—The difference between two test
results, obtained by the same operator with the same apparatus
12.2 Routine Standardization—A minimum of a two point
under constant operating conditions on identical test material
routine standardization shall be performed if the instrument
would, in the long run, in the normal and correct operation of
fails the validation check or at the start of each working shift.
the test method, exceed the values in Tables 2-5 only in one
A minimum of three analyses shall be made using the blank
case in twenty. Tables 2 and 3 are for light fuels (ASTM No.
and working standard.
0-GT, No. 1-GT, No. 2-GT, Grade 1-D, Grade 2-D, and Grade
4-D fuel oils) and Tables 4 and 5 for heavy fuels (No. 3-GT and
13. Procedure No. 4-GT fuel oils).
13.1 Analysis of Fuel Samples—Analyze the test specimen 15.1.2 Reproducibility—The difference between two single
in the same calibration curve program and manner as the and independent results, obtained by different operators work-
standardization standards. A new disc electrode and re-pointed ing in different laboratories on identical test materials, would in
rod electrode must be used for each analysis. A laboratory
grade paper towel or installation tool shall be used to install the 3
Supporting data have been filed at ASTM International Headquarters and may
disc electrode in order to protect it from contamination due to be obtained by requesting Research Report RR:D02-1514.
4
D6728 − 16
TABLE 2 Repeatability for Light Fuels (ASTM No. 0-GT, No. 1-GT, TABLE 5 Calculated Repeatability for Heavy Fuels at Selected
No. 2-GT, Grade 1-D, Grade 2-D, and Grade 4-D) Concentrations in mg/kg (ASTM No. 3-GT and No. 4-GT)
NOTE 1—X = mean concentration in mg/kg. ILS Range,
Element 1 10 100
mg/kg
ILS Range, Repeatability,
Element Aluminum 0.95-241.0 0.3 1.4 7.9
mg/kg mg/kg
Calcium 1.08-241.8 0.2 1.2 9.3
0.33
Aluminum 0.44-10.18 0.43(X) Chromium 0.34-226.6 0.3 1.5 12.1
Calcium 0.002-10.2 0.33(X)0.43 Copper 0.02-253.0 0.2 1.7 14.0
Chromium 0.34-5.0 0.31(X)0.30 Iron 1.04-227.8 0.3 1.8 9.6
Copper 0.05-9.5 0.36(X)0.40 Lead 0.30-232.2 0.8 2.6 8.8
Iron 0.14-9.7 0.53(X)0.27 Magnesium 0.86-674.4 0.2 1.2 9.3
Lead 0.18-10.7 0.74(X+0.02)0.33 Nickel 0.99-235.4 0.2 1.3 8.4
Magnesium 0.021-31.4 0.29(X+0.01)0.61 Potassium 0.37-96.1 0.3 0.9 ...
Nickel 0.01-10.0 0.35(X)0.44 Silicon 0.16-228.9 0.6 1.8 6.3
Potassium 0.02-9.9 0.38(X)0.35 Sodium 1.14-238.6 ... 1.2 11.5
Silicon 0.002-9.7 0.52(X)0.48 Vanadium 1.09-234.4 0.2 1.3 9.3
Sodium 0.39-10.4 0.24(X)0.43 Zinc 0.17-166.1 0.2 1.7 12.7
Vanadium 0.01-16 0.44(X)0.53
Zinc 0.07-9.6 0.34(X)0.41
5
D6728 − 16
TABLE 8 Reproducibility for Heavy Fuels (ASTM No. 3-GT and
No. 4-GT)
NOTE 1—X = mean concentration in mg/kg.
ILS Range, Reproducibility,
Element
mg/kg mg/kg
Aluminum 0.95-241.0 0.40(X+0.07)0.767
Calcium 1.08-241.8 0.2958(X+0.18)0.88
Chromium 0.34-226.6 0.31(X+0.58)0.92
Copper 0.02-253.0 0.285(X+0.32)0.93
Iron 1.04-227.8 0.67(X)0.723
Lead 0.30-232.2 1.33(X+0.32)0.54
Magnesium 0.86-674.4 0.31(X)0.88
Nickel 0.99-235.4 0.52(X+0.13)0.825
Potassium 0.37-96.1 0.65(X)0.45
Silicon 0.16-228.9 0.88(X+0.1)0.54
Sodium 1.14-238.6 0.32(X)0.94
Vanadium 1.09-234.4 0.55(X+0.05)0.85
Zinc 0.17-166.1 0.41(X+0)0.87
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1.1 Confirm the performance of the instrument or the test X1.4 In the absence of explicit requirements given in the
procedure by analyzing a quality control (QC) sample. test method, the frequency of QC testing is dependent on the
criticality of the quantity being measured, the demonstrated
X1.2 Prior to monitoring the measurement process, the user stability of the testing process, and customer requirements.
of the method should determine the average value and control Generally, a QC sample is analyzed each testing day with
limits of the QC sample. See Practice D6299 and ASTM routine samples. The QC frequency should be increased if a
MNL7.4 large number of samples are routinely analyzed. However,
X1.3 Record the QC results and analyze by control charts or when it is demonstrated that the testing is under statistical
other statistically equivalent technique to ascertain the statis- control, the QC testing frequency may be reduced. The QC
tical control status of the total testing process. See Practice sample precision should be periodically checked against the
D6299 and ASTM MNL7.4 Any out-of-control data should ASTM method precision to ensure data quality.4
trigger investigation for root cause(s). The results of this
investigation may, but not necessarily, result in instrument X1.5 It is recommended that, if possible, the type of QC
calibration. sample that is regularly tested be representative of the samples
routinely analyzed. An ample supply of QC sample material
4
should be available for the intended period of use, and must be
ASTM MNL7, Manual on Presentation of Data Control Chart Analysis, 6th ed.,
Section 3, Control Charts for Individuals, available from ASTM International homogeneous and stable under the anticipated storage condi-
Headquarters. tions.
6
D6728 − 16
X1.6 See Practice D6299 and ASTM MNL74 for further
guidance on QC and control charting techniques.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Subcommittee D02.03 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue
(D6728 – 11) that may impact the use of this standard. (Approved June 1, 2016.)
(1) Added metal limits given in turbine fuel specifications in (3) Added reference to an additional sampling procedure in
1.1.1.1. 9.1.
(2) Added Practice D4177 to Referenced Documents.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/