Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exam 1 Study Guide
Exam 1 Study Guide
Exam 1 Study Guide
Your textbook suggests that resources can generally be organized into Physical,
Organizational and Human.
Sometimes it is the case indeed that human resources are the most valuable resources a firm
has, but is likely depends on some other factors or variables. For instance, the relative
importance of a set of resources depends on the competitive strategy of a firm.
If, for instance, a firm has what we call a “cost cutter” competitive strategy and that same firm has
compensation policies to match, e.g., paying workers at or below market, this firm may not value its human
resources and thus they may not be managed in a way that provides the firm competitive advantage. If, however, a
firm has a competitive strategy based on differentiation, which we will talk about later in the course, the firm will
try to make itself different in some way from other firms, in a way that consumers value and will pay a premium
price for.
It is often the case that firms will need highly talented, skilled and motivated employees –
and will need to manage these employees effectively – in order to differentiate, i.e., in order to
deliver an exceptional product or service.
If we apply this same model and analysis to human resources, we can see that these resources
can indeed be valuable.
For instance, certain skills and talents are rare; human knowledge can be non-substitutable (in the sense of
specific knowledge that is gained through experience working for a particular industry or a specific firm) and so on.
That said, knowledge and skills are often transferrable between firms: An employee that has spent several years
working for Google can be poached by Yahoo and Yahoo can try to leverage that employee’s knowledge, skills and
abilities in general, as well as the industry- and firm-specific knowledge that employee developed to the benefit of
Google.
This being the case, human resources can be particularly valuable when the unique
knowledge, skills and abilities and other characteristics of a workforce are uniquely tailored to a
specific firm.
For instance, Apple and Microsoft are both firms that value computer programming knowledge and analytical
skills, yet one firm – Microsoft – relatively values competition between employees and the other – Apple – relatively
values collaboration and group-based work. Thus, when it comes to human resources and human resources
management, these two firms will try to recruit, select, develop and retain potentially very different types of workers .
This is a large part of why HRM is important: it allows a firm to manage human resources
in a way that is of competitive advantage for that particular firm. HRM poses a variety of
unique and interesting challenges. Perhaps foremost among them would be trying to design
policies and practices that are effective and that help a firm gain and sustain competitive
advantage. A related challenge is that different types or groups of workers and different
workers individually will respond differently to the same policy or practice. So part of what
HR is or does is to manage HR policies and practices as well as the way in which workers
respond to these policies and practices.
When it comes to measuring how well a firm is managing human resources, different types
of firms might emphasize different measures or metrics—but firms tend to look at the same types
of metrics. These would include, for instance, size of the workforce and labor costs; turnover
and turnover costs; employee attitudes, such as job satisfaction and work engagement;
workforce productivity. A challenge here is that, unlike with other business functions like
marketing or sales, measuring the value or impact of human resources in general or of a
particular HRM function, such as a training program, is difficult– difficult in the sense that there
often isn’t as obvious or quantifiable and outcome.
We can measure customer satisfaction and firms do this to be sure, but connecting this to a
return on investment or ROI is a challenge.
For instance, in the sense that one would have to connect the training to changes in customer satisfaction and hence
to changes in financial performance of a firm—links which are difficult to demonstrate and tenuous due to
alternative explanations to changes in satisfaction and performance.
3. What HR is and its role in organizational effectiveness
Albertson’s example
Albertson's grocery store in Southern California strategically adapted to increasing
pressure from competitors like Walmart. Recognizing their inability to compete solely on price,
they shifted their strategy to prioritize customer service, essentially becoming integrators. The
top management team, with input from HR executives, conceptualized this strategy by aligning it
with the firm's strengths and weaknesses. To implement this change, Albertson's revamped their
HR strategy, particularly in the selection process. They collaborated with the IT department to
develop computer programs allowing applicants to input information at in-store kiosks, including
resumes and selection tests. The system helped select employees based on desired traits like
customer service experience and agreeableness. This initiative not only improved their
competitive position but also demonstrated a positive return on investment (ROI), showcasing
the effectiveness of the strategic shift.
Human resource management is “the policies, practices, and systems that influence
employees’ behavior, attitudes, and performance”, and this is a general but useful definition.
One might add that these policies and practices are generally designed by human resource
management departments and staff for the purpose of positively influencing employee
attitudes and behaviors
HR is comprised of several functions.
HR departments can be organized around four major dimensions, which include:
1. managing the human resource environment (this deals with legal compliance,
designing work that is engaging; and strategic HRM);
2. acquiring and preparing human resources (this deals with HR planning and
recruitment, employee selection and placement and employee training)
3. assessment and development of human resources (this deals with measuring
performance or performance appraisal, employee development and retention)
4. compensating human resources (this deals with creating compensation and benefits
systems).
6. How HR is changing
Given the evolution of the HR field towards a more proactive role, the responsibility of HR
departments to demonstrate value has become crucial. HR metrics, which measure the
effectiveness of HR policies and practices, play a significant role. These metrics can range from
employee attitudes, engagement, and job performance to broader business-level metrics like
labor costs and productivity.
Several challenges confront HRM today, and three key sets are outlined in many sources.
The first is the sustainability challenge, encompassing the need for shareholder returns,
high-quality products and services, employee experiences, social responsibility, and adapting to
new work arrangements. Sometimes, what's good for society might not be the most efficient way
for a company to make a profit, creating a challenge.
This challenge is closely linked to how companies manage their people (HRM). In the US,
there's been a big shift from making things to providing services. Skilled workers are in
demand, but there are fewer of them because many people are retiring, and there aren't as many
new workers. This makes it important for companies to find skilled workers from other
countries.
Healthcare costs in the US are going up, making companies rethink the benefits they give to
workers. There's also a "war for talent" as companies compete for skilled workers. Workers
today want more flexible work options, like working from home. Research shows that companies
offering these options tend to do better than those that don't. So, having good systems to
manage people is crucial for companies facing these challenges.
The global challenge emphasizes the necessity for U.S. companies to enhance HRM
practices, explore global markets, and prepare employees for international assignments. In
today's competitive global landscape, firms face challenges from both domestic and international
rivals. HR plays a pivotal role in helping organizations strategically navigate these
challenges. It assists in identifying the skills needed for specific strategies, whether it's growth,
technology acquisition, business expansion, or downsizing. As businesses go global, HR
provides specialized knowledge for successful international operations, aiding in designing
and facilitating work assignments. Additionally, HR helps firms make strategic decisions
regarding offshoring, guiding choices in location, sourcing, recruitment, and training to
balance cost reduction with maintaining service levels and customer satisfaction.
Ultimately, the proactive involvement of HR is crucial for firms aiming to thrive amidst
increased competition and evolving workforce dynamics.
1. Strategy types
Cost Uniqueness
Broad Target Cost Leadership Differentiation
Narrow Target Focused Cost Leadership Focused Differentiation
Firms generally compete in two ways: price leadership, offering competitively low
prices, or differentiation, excelling in a valuable aspect of a product or service and charging a
premium. Market scope varies, with examples like:
Walmart, a price leader in a broad market, and Nordstrom, a differentiator in customer service for a wide
market. Patagonia competes based on quality but targets a niche market of environmentally conscious outdoor
enthusiasts.
Niche-focused cost leaders are rarer, but TJ Maxx targets bargain-seeking customers, competing on price with
designer retailers. Some firms, like Target, adopt an integrated approach, competing on both price (with Walmart)
and differentiation (offering exclusive product lines).
2. Strategic Decisions
Top management teams and entrepreneurs face three crucial questions when it comes to
strategy: Where will we compete, how will we compete, and with what? Industry
competitiveness varies, with some industries having fierce rivalries and powerful suppliers,
making profitability challenging.
For example, the airline industry is notoriously difficult due to fierce competition, customer options, and
powerful suppliers.
Managers must decide on their competitive strategy, aligning with the firm's strengths and
the industry's characteristics. The choice of "what will we compete" involves deciding on the
most valuable sets of resources, how to acquire, deploy, and manage them. Human resources
are generally valuable, but their significance varies based on industry and strategy. Managing
human resources in alignment with the overall strategy is crucial for success.
Strategic decisions are influenced by a SWOT analysis. Firms analyze their external and
internal environments to determine strengths and weaknesses and assess potential
opportunities and threats. Human resources issues, such as labor supply and demand, play a
critical role in this analysis. Labor supply considerations, including how other firms leverage
human capital, are vital competitive factors, emphasizing the importance of incorporating HR
management into strategic planning.
Competing based on price requires a firm to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale.
Walmart, known for leveraging technology in inventory management and aggressive supplier dealings, keeps
costs low to attract a large customer base, achieving greater profits than competitors.
Competing based on differentiation involves offering a unique experience valued by
consumers, charging a premium price for a competitive advantage.
Sustaining this advantage requires continuous efforts, such as Nordstrom's focus on treating employees well.
An integrated strategy demands minimizing costs while successfully differentiating, a
challenging combination. Firms with a focus approach aim to excel in a specific niche market,
gaining a competitive edge through success in that niche.
Strategic management goes beyond generic strategies. Executives must effectively manage
their most valuable resources—physical, organizational, and human resources. Organizational
structure and work design play a crucial role in shaping competitive advantage.
For instance, a firm pursuing price leadership may benefit from a functional structure, emphasizing efficiency
in stable environments. HR policies align with organizational and work designs, emphasizing specific behaviors and
low-cost training to support the chosen strategy.
In the first scenario, termed "administrative linkage," HR is entirely detached from strategic
planning, reminiscent of the old "personnel" days. The absence of mutual influence between
strategy and HR practices characterizes this approach.
Moving to the one-way linkage, strategic planning remains separate from HR, yet HR
strategies are shaped by the firm's overall strategy. While an improvement over the
administrative linkage, this approach lacks HR's direct influence on strategic planning.
The two-way linkage allows strategic planning and HR planning to influence each other to
some extent, creating a bidirectional flow of information.
However, the most effective approach is the integrative linkage, where strategic planning
and HR planning are intertwined. In this collaborative model, HR executives actively participate
in strategic planning alongside the top management team. This integrated approach not only
enhances efficiency but also provides HR with a prime opportunity to influence the firm's
competitive strategies and resource management. While not the norm, some sophisticated firms
embrace the integrative linkage, showcasing the synergy between leadership and HR
departments.
Emergent strategies, often originating from lower levels of an organization, highlight the
importance of HR in facilitating communication and managing continuous improvement
processes. Instances like the introduction of the Frappuccino at Starbucks, driven by employees
lower in the hierarchy, emphasize the need for HR to support the flow of ideas and ensure their
realization. In the realm of strategic HRM, it is not only crucial for the Chief Human Resource
Officer (CHRO) to be involved in formulating intended strategies but also for HR to consistently
promote continuous improvement, encourage strategy reassessment, and facilitate effective
information flow and communication between various organizational levels.
For a strategy to succeed, effective implementation is crucial, and the organization and
design of work play a vital role. Job design is one of the key variables in strategy
implementation. The connection between strategy and job design significantly influences a firm's
success. Consider a scenario where a firm aims to differentiate itself by offering a diverse and
unique product line. This strategic decision has direct implications for how work is organized.
For example, in the latter part of the last century, U.S. automobile manufacturers shifted from
a mechanistic approach, characterized by assembly lines, to a more motivational approach,
implementing self-directed work teams. This shift allowed manufacturers like GM to produce a
more varied range of cars in response to diverse consumer demands.
In this story, the Times quotes the Chairman of Volvo as having said:
''I want the people in a team to be able to go home at night and really say, 'I built that car,' ‘ ''That is my
dream.'’ As we will see later in this lesson, this is highly representative of a motivational approach to work design.
Thus, how work is designed should very much be influenced by and supportive of a firm’s
business strategy, culture and broader approach to managing human resources. At Volvo, there
has long been a people-oriented culture, and the relatively early move toward a team-based
motivational approach to work design is, in hindsight, no big surprise. If you look at their
website, Volvo will tell you the same: They say that “The Volvo Way is based on the conviction
that every individual has the capability and the determination to improve our business”. As your
textbook explains, the reason that auto manufacturers in Asia (namely, Japan – at Toyota) and
Europe (namely, Volvo) were successful when US auto manufacturers were getting hit hard
competitively was due to early movement to adopt more motivational work design, and to do
so in a way that was consistent with the external environment, the strengths, weaknesses and
unique characteristics of these firms. They had smart management- which helped them be so
successful at that time.
Key terms to understand include tasks (distinct work activities with a specific purpose), jobs
(collections of tasks), job families (groups of jobs with similar characteristics), and occupations
(higher-level professions, e.g., "accounting"). Job analysis methods vary, with standardized
approaches like O*Net and the Position Analysis Questionnaire discussed in detail. Customized
methods, such as the task inventory approach, involve gathering information about job tasks
from subject matter experts and job incumbents to create a reliable picture of job requirements.
In job analysis, two key types of information are crucial: job descriptions and job
specifications.
- A job description is a comprehensive list of tasks, duties, and responsibilities
(TDRs) associated with a specific job. TDRs are observable actions, providing
detailed insights into the work performed. A well-constructed job description should
balance breadth and specificity, including job title, activities, procedures, working
conditions, social environment, and conditions of employment.
- A job specification outlines the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other
characteristics (KSAOs) essential for an individual to perform the job. Knowledge
refers to necessary factual or procedural information, skills denote proficiency in
specific tasks, and abilities represent enduring capabilities. Other characteristics may
encompass personality traits like achievement motivation. Job specifications identify
the indispensable elements of a job, guiding recruitment, selection, and placement.
They may be included in a job description or exist as a separate document.
5. PAQ
The Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) is a standardized tool with six sections,
examining various facets of a job: information input, relationships, mental processes, job
context, work output, and other characteristics. Comprising 194 questions, the PAQ is
versatile, applicable across diverse job types, industries, and organizations. Respondents assess
the relevance of each item to the specific job using six scales, and the resulting scores undergo
computer analysis at PAQ headquarters.
Research shows that the PAQ gauges 32 specific dimensions and 12 global overall
dimensions of jobs, linking scores to subtests of the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). This
linkage aids in understanding the required abilities for the job. The PAQ offers a standardized
and comprehensive format, facilitating comparisons across different jobs, whether similar or
dissimilar. An additional advantage is its coverage of work context, inputs, outputs, and
processes.
Despite its benefits, the PAQ has limitations. Its length of 194 questions along six
dimensions makes it time-consuming. Due to its complexity, only individuals familiar with the
tool should use it for job analysis, necessitating specialized knowledge. Furthermore, as a
standardized and less customized tool, the PAQ may present an abstract view of a job and might
not suit certain work types, particularly white-collar positions. Therefore, it may not be ideal for
developing job descriptions or redesigning jobs, but it remains widely used in job analysis.
6. O*NET
ONet, or the Occupational Information Network, has replaced the Department of Labor's
Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT). Unlike the DOT, which relied on fixed job titles and
narrow descriptions, ONet employs a flexible language system applicable to various types of
work, describing qualifications, work styles, activities, and contexts for around 1,000 broadly
defined occupations. This adaptability is valuable in the dynamic, complex, and globalized job
market. O*Net is widely utilized by employers, employment agencies, vocational counselors,
and job seekers, providing valuable insights into the qualifications and skills required for diverse
occupations. Its availability and comprehensive approach make it a prominent resource in
navigating today's evolving employment landscape.
7. Work re-design
- Job design is the process of defining the way work will be performed and the tasks
that will be required in a given job.
- Job redesign refers to changing the tasks or the way work is performed in an existing
job.
- Four approaches used in job design are:
o mechanistic approach
o motivational approach
o biological approach
o perceptual-motor approach
Characteristics Definition
Mechanistic - Specialization - identifying the simplest way to
Approach - Skill variety structure work that maximizes
- Work methods autonomy efficiency
- reducing the complexity of the work
=> more efficiency => train quickly
and easy to perform
Motivational - Decision-making - Focus on the psychological meaning
Approach autonomy and motivational potential
- Task significance - Aims to boost employee motivation
- Interdependence by increasing job complexity,
implementing strategies like job
enlargement, job enrichment, and
constructing jobs around
sociotechnical systems => a more
meaningful and challenging work
environment.
Biological Approach - Physical demands - Identify clearly the outputs of work,
- Ergonomics to specify the quality and quantity
- Work conditions standards for those outputs, and to
analyze the processes and inputs
necessary for producing outputs that
meet the quality standards.
Perceptual-motor - Job complexity - Focus on human mental capabilities
Approach - Information processing and limitations.
- Equipment use - The goal is to design jobs in a way
that ensures that they do not exceed
people's mental capabilities =>
improve reliability, safety, and user
reactions => decreasing the job’s
cognitive demands.
8. In-class exercise
HR Planning
3. Forecasting
Predictions about labor demand are usually done around specific jobs or skill categories. .
Recent research – the Differentiated Workforce - suggests that firms should focus on those
jobs or skillsets that are key to the organization’s success. Organizations will typically use
multiple methods to forecast – including both statistical and judgmental methods. In terms of
determining labor demand, firms (usually larger, more sophisticated firms) will use sophisticated
statistical models to predict labor demand. Leading indicators are essentially variables that
explain a significant portion of variance in labor demand. Since leading indicators are not always
right, pooled judgment of experts (e.g., HR practitioners and managers) will be used to try to
predict labor demand.
Determining the supply of labor for key positions is crucial after establishing labor demand.
Internal labor supply analysis, predominantly for existing roles, involves statistical or judgmental
methods. Staffing and HR metrics, including retirements, promotions, and turnovers, guide
predictions. Transitional matrices, illustrating employee movement between related jobs, aid in
understanding historical trends and planning for the future. By analyzing such matrices, HR
analysts can identify the sources of labor supply and make informed adjustments. They are
particularly useful for affirmative action and EEO purposes, providing insights into labor supply
by subgroup. Workforce utilization reviews compare subgroup proportions within a job to
external labor markets, revealing potential underutilization.
As firms compete for talented workers, external benchmarks, such as industry growth
projections and government agencies like the Department of Labor, become crucial for assessing
labor supply. Talent inventories, databases containing employee records, including skills,
interests, and career goals, offer valuable insights for succession planning. This internal labor
supply analysis helps identify successors for key positions. Firms must decide between internal
and external sourcing, each with its pros and cons. Internal sourcing may necessitate
training, while external recruitment incurs additional costs. Balancing these factors is
essential for effective workforce planning.
Early Retirement:
The average age of U.S. workforce is increasing.
Baby boomers are not retiring early due to:
improved health
fear that Social Security will be cut
mandatory retirement is outlawed
collapse of the financial and housing markets made it economically unviable to
retire
Many employers try voluntary attrition among older workers through early retirement
incentive programs.
b. Labor Shortage:
OPTIONS SPEED REVOCABILITY
Overtime Fast High
Temporary employees Fast High
Outsourcing Fast High
Retrained transfers Slow Moderate
Turnover reductions Slow Moderate
New external hires Slow Low
Technological innovation Slow Low
Temporary Employees:
- Hiring temporary workers helps eliminate a labor shortage and affords flexibility
needed to operate efficiently during demand swings.
3 Advantages:
1. Temporary workers free a company from administrative tasks and financial
burdens.
2. Temporary workers are often times tested by a temporary agency.
3. Many temporary agencies train employees before sending them to employers.