Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Krieger 2015 Public Health Embodied History and Social Justice Looking Forward
Krieger 2015 Public Health Embodied History and Social Justice Looking Forward
Nancy Krieger
Abstract
This essay was delivered as a commencement address at the University of California–
Berkeley School of Public Health on May 17, 2015. Reflecting on events spanning
from 1990 to 1999 to 2015, when I gave my first, second, and third commencement
talks at the school, I discuss four notable features of our present era and offer five
insights for ensuring that health equity be the guiding star to orient us all. The four
notable features are: (1) growing recognition of the planetary emergency of global
climate change; (2) almost daily headlines about armed conflicts and atrocities;
(3) growing public awareness of and debate about epic levels of income and
wealth inequalities; and (4) growing activism about police killings and, more broadly,
“Black Lives Matter.” The five insights are: (1) public health is a public good, not a
commodity; (2) the “tragedy of the commons” is a canard; the lack of a common
good is what ails us; (3) good science is not enough, and bad science is harmful;
(4) good evidence—however vital—is not enough to change the world; and
(5) history is vital, because we live our history, embodied. Our goal: a just and
sustainable world in which we and every being on this planet may truly thrive.
Keywords
social justice, public health, health equity, embodiment, epidemiology
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston,
Massachusetts, USA
Corresponding Author:
Nancy Krieger, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public
Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Kresge 717, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Email: nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu
588 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)
concealing the obscene reality of the impoverishment of one in three U.S. black,
Latino, American Indian, and Alaska Native children.16,17 Issues of gun violence
and police violence, moreover, were seared in the public consciousness by the
1999 Columbine High School massacre18,19 and by the 41-bullet police killing in
New York City of yet another unarmed African-American man, Amadou
Diallo, age 22, for which all four officers were acquitted.20,21
Indeed, when I spoke at commencement in 1999, the ambitious goal of
“Health for All in the Year 2000,” coined at the WHO in 1977 and promulgated
at the United Nations Alma Ata conference in 1978,10,22,23 was clearly not
reachable. This conference, possibly a mystery to many of you, and barely
referred to in the peer-reviewed scientific literature,24 in fact was attended by
the governments of most nations on earth plus myriad WHO and nongovern-
mental organizations.10,25 It had the audacity to declare:
1. Health is “a fundamental human right and that the attainment of the highest
possible level of health is a most important world-wide social goal whose
realization requires the action of many other social and economic sectors in
addition to the health sector.”
2. “The existing gross inequality in the health status of the people, particularly
between developed and developing countries as well as within countries,
is politically, socially, and economically unacceptable and is, therefore, of
common concern to all countries.”
3. “The people have the right and duty to participate individually and collect-
ively in the planning and implementation of their health care.”
4. “An acceptable level of health for all the people of the world by the year 2000
can be attained through a fuller and better use of the world’s resources,
a considerable part of which is now spent on armaments and military
conflicts.”
1. First, the planetary emergency of global climate change looms ever larger, as
does organizing to address it, while governmental and private-sector actions
remain far short of where they need to be.27
2. Second, headlines continue to report daily on yet another atrocity involving
armed conflict or attacks in yet another region in our unstable world, and in
their wake follow yet more public heath crises, of which the Ebola epidemic is
but one of many that could be named.10,45–48
Krieger 591
How do we make a world in which all lives matter? You are part of making
this happen. In this turbulent world, we need you. You, who are graduating
today, you, the next generation of public health professionals, you, with your
energy, your expertise, your hopes, your fears, your questions, your confidence,
your skills—and your dedication and commitment to the people’s health.
We need you.
And I do mean all of you: we need you who are doing basic lab science; you
who are working to improve people’s living and working conditions, transpor-
tation and food systems, and the ways we eat, play, rest, and learn; you who are
devising new statistical methods and computing and communication systems;
you who are analyzing the societal determination of health and developing ways
to have health equity be part of all policies and to terminate those that are
harmful; and you who are developing better ways to improve people’s access
to appropriate and high-quality care. We need all of you, working together, and
working with others, here and across the world, and especially the very people
whose health is most harmed by deprivation and discrimination.
As someone, then, who was literally in your place, 26 years ago, let me share
with you five insights to help ensure that health equity be a guiding star to orient
us all:
. Insight #1: Public health is a public good, not a commodity. The goal of public
health is to be useful, with a priority on prevention and health equity.10,23,26,66
This is a different goal than that of being profitable, that is, making the
592 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)
highest return possible for private investors.49–52 Yet, we now live in an age
where what is praiseworthy, at least in the mainstream, is “entrepreneurial,”
even for public health67–70—and in which private philanthropists drive public
agendas with little or no public accountability.67 But never forget that gains in
public health are often made by cutting into the ill-gotten profits of those who
take shortcuts with the public’s safety and well-being. If that weren’t the case,
we wouldn’t endlessly have the fights we do with corporations and the pol-
iticians they underwrite as we strive for better regulation of hazardous expos-
ures, for minimum wages that are living wages so that people working full-
time are not below the poverty line, and for regulations that curb corruption;
the list goes on and on.10,13,26–29,36,37 Never lose sight of the “public” in public
health, or the public good.
. Insight #2: The “tragedy of the commons” is a canard; the lack of a common
good is what ails us. I would suspect that few of you here today have actually
read the highly influential 1968 article published in Science whose title gave us
the enduring phrase: “The tragedy of the commons”.71 Read it. Why?
Because, even though it is now roundly critiqued by leading economists
and ecologists,72–76 it remains touted as a sound analysis of why common
property causes ecological devastation, and why private property free of gov-
ernmental regulation is essential to well-being. In fact, it is a dyspeptic screed
by a self-described “genetically trained biologist,”71(p1247) Garrett Hardin,
who never studied people—or economics. I quote (and I promise I am not
making up these quotes!):
1. “If we love the truth we must openly deny the validity of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights”71(p1246) because it affirms that “any choice
and decision with regard to the size of the family must rest with the family
itself, and cannot be made by anyone else.”71(p1246)
2. “The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize is the
necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding.”71(p1248)
. Insight #3: Good science is not enough, and bad science is harmful. The point is
not science versus politics. For us in public health, we need the best science
Krieger 593
possible to advance the public’s health and to make the case for why we need
health equity. Saying this, however, does not mean we can frame science as if
it were outside of politics. It is not.26,78 We all know—or should know—and
confront the sorry histories and current realities of scientific racism, sexism,
and eugenics.26,79,80 Nor is good science reducible to politics. There is always
a tension between having our ideas—and actually testing them, publicly, in a
way that others could test them, too, and with recognition that ideas and
methods deemed sound at one time can be shown fallacious at another.26,78
Cherish this tension. And embrace yet another:
. Insight #4: Good evidence, however vital, is not enough to change the world.
Mobilization matters: that is, people exerting power—whether the elite, via
their concentrated wealth, or the many, via their numbers. Hence the 99%.
Public change for the good of the people’s health has always been powered by
the strength of social movements.10,81 So think always of to whom your work
is directed, in terms of who is vital for pushing for change, and make sure
your work is always of top-notch quality, because the public’s health
demands no less. And do not be afraid to call for action for the people’s
health. Finally:
. Insight #5: History is vital, because we live our history, embodied. We cannot
understand our biology or our societies apart from history. We live as our
phenotypes, which are our embodied history—and indeed this embodied his-
tory is, for all beings, all organisms, the very marrow of this living
earth.26,82–84 To act well, to be wise, we must know and understand our
context and how it has come about, and this means we must take the time
to learn our history, critically, and that of the people with whom we work and
who are the focus of our work. Knowledge is essential precisely because it is a
potent antidote to one poisonous feature of privilege, which gives license
to—and reveals itself through—what one can afford to ignore.85 We all can
learn—and only by collectively grappling with this history, for bad and for
good, can we make health inequities history, a subject for historians to study,
not for people to endure.
And so, in closing, I would like to invite all of you now to stand up—and to
hear your collective voice! In a departure from usual ceremony—and perhaps to
create a new tradition!—I am sharing with you the last five minutes of the time
allotted for my address.
What we are going to do is sing, together, new words to a traditional song.
The tune is that of the classic “Down by the Riverside,” which calls for renoun-
cing war and building peace, and whose origins have been traced back to a pre-
Civil War U.S. slave song.86 The new words have been composed by a colleague
of mine, Makani Themba, the founding executive director of the Praxis Project,
a leading U.S. grassroots movement institution whose mission is to build
“healthy communities by transforming the power relationships and structures
594 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)
that affect our lives.”87 Makani penned these new words for a special celebration
we had last year at the American Public Health Association to mark the 20th
anniversary of the Spirit of 1848 Caucus, which I cofounded and chair, and
which is focused on the inextricable links between social justice and public
health.88,89
And so, everyone, please open your program to the section for the song
(Figure 1). All graduates, all faculty, all staff, and your loved ones and family,
please rise! - and may we together bring our skills, our expertise, our intellect,
and our passion to the urgent work of creating a just and sustainable world in
which we and every being on this planet may truly thrive—so that we may all
live, love, work, and die with our dignity intact and our humanity cherished. Let
us sing!
Funding
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication
of this article.
References
1. Krieger N. On becoming a public health professional: reflections on democracy,
leadership, and accountability. Commencement address, school of public health,
University of California at Berkeley. J Public Health Policy. 1990;11(4):412–419.
2. Oreskes M. Poll finds U.S. expects peace dividend. New York Times. January 25,
1990. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/25/us/poll-finds-us-expects-peace-dividend.
html. Accessed May 19, 2015.
3. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). World military expend-
itures, 1988–2013. http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex-graphs-for-
data-launch-2014/World-military-expenditure-1988-2013.png. Accessed May 19,
2015.
4. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). 2014 Yearbook. http://
www.sipri.org/yearbook/2014/files/SIPRIYBSummary14.pdf. Accessed May 19,
2015.
5. World Health Organization (WHO). Programme budget 2012–2013. Performance
assessment report. http://www.who.int/about/resources_planning/HQPRP14.1_PBP
A2012-2013.pdf?ua¼1. Accessed May 19, 2015.
6. Butler D. World Health agency gets a grip on its budget. Scientific American. June 4,
2013. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/world-health-agency-gets-a-grip-on-
its-budget/ Accessed May 19, 2015.
7. Park A. Why the World Health Organization doesn’t have enough funds to fight
Ebola. Mother Jones. September 8, 2014. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/
09/ebola-world-health-organization-budget. Accessed May 19, 2015.
8. Unger JP, De Paepe P, Buitrón R, Soors W. Costa Rica: achievements of a heterodox
health policy. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(4):636–643.
9. Dwyer J. How to connect bioethics and environmental ethics. Bioethics.
2009;23(9):497–502.
10. Birn AE, Pillay Y, Holtz T. Textbook of International Health, 3rd ed. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press; 2009.
11. Krieger N. Passionate epistemology, critical advocacy, and public health: doing our
profession proud. Commencement address, school of public health, University of
California at Berkeley, May 15, 1999. Crit Public Health. 2000;10(3):287–294.
12. Fielding JE. Public health in the twentieth century: advances and challenges. Annu
Rev Public Health. 1999;20:xiii–xxx.
13. Navarro V, ed. Neoliberalism, Globalization, and Inequalities: Consequences for
Health and Quality of Life. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishers; 2007.
14. Beckert S. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York, NY: Knopf; 2014.
15. Income inequality: a project of the Institute for Policy Studies. http://inequality.org/
income-inequality/ Accessed May 19, 2015.
16. US Census. Historical poverty tables – people. Table 3: poverty status, by age, race,
and Hispanic origin. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/
people.html. Accessed May 19, 2015.
596 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)
17. US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Status and
trends in the education of American Indians and Alaska Natives. August 2005. http://
nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/nativetrends/ind_1_6.asp. Accessed May 19, 2015.
18. Brooke J. Terror in Littleton: the overview: 2 students in Colorado school said to gun
down as many as 23 and kill themselves in a siege. New York Times, April 21, 1999.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/21/us/terror-littleton-overview-2-students-color
ado-school-said-gun-down-many-23-kill.html. Accessed May 19, 2015.
19. Bonanno C, Levenson RL Jr. School shooters: history, current theoretical and empir-
ical findings, and strategies for prevention. Sage OPEN, January–February, 1–11,
2014; doi:10.1177/2158244014525425.
20. Amadou Diallo. New York Times. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/times
topics/people/d/amadou_diallo/index.html. Accessed May 19, 2015.
21. Farbman D. It is not an Era of Repose: how the legal system personalizes injustice
and sparks protest. Law Cult Humanit. (Published on-line before print February 13,
2015); doi:10.1177/1743872115570418.
22. National Library of Medicine. Health for all. http://apps.nlm.nih.gov/against
theodds/exhibit/health_for_all.cfm. Accessed May 19, 2015.
23. Declaration of Alma Ata. http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_
en.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2015.
24. Web of Science. Topic ¼ (Declaration AND Alma AND Ata). Search: April 3, 2015.
http://apps.webofknowledge.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/CitationReport.do?
product¼WOS&search_mode¼CitationReport&SID¼1CBE6nqiQWQOcXV4xYS
&page¼1&cr_pqid¼1&viewType¼summary&colName¼WOS. Accessed April 3,
2015.
25. World Health Organization. Primary Health Care: Report of the International
Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12 September 1978.
Geneva: World Health Organization (WHO); 1978. http://www.unicef.org/about/
history/files/Alma_Ata_conference_1978_report.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2015.
26. Krieger N. Epidemiology and the People’s Health: Theory and Context. New York,
NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
27. Klein N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York, NY: Simon
& Schuster; 2014.
28. Smith J, Byrd S, Reese E, Smythe E. (eds). Handbook on World Social Forum
Activism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers; 2012.
29. Harvey D. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press; 2015.
30. Vidal J, Neube M, Bromund TR, Ghosh J. Margaret Thatcher: her impact and legacy
in global development. The Guardian. April 16, 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/
global-development/poverty-matters/2013/apr/16/margaret-thatcher-impact-legacy-
development. Accessed May 19, 2015.
31. Klein N. Rebels in search of rules. Op-ed. New York Times. December 2, 1999. http://
www.nytimes.com/1999/12/02/opinion/rebels-in-search-of-rules.html. Accessed May
19, 2015.
32. Kahn J, Sanger DE. Trade obstacles unmoved, Seattle talks end in failure. New York
Times. December 4, 1999. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/04/world/trade-obsta
cles-unmoved-seattle-talks-end-in-failure.html Accessed May 19, 2015.
Krieger 597
33. Verhovek SH. Seattle police chief resigns in aftermath of protests. New York Times.
December 8, 1999. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/08/us/seattle-police-chief-
resigns-in-aftermath-of-protests.html. Accessed May 19, 2015.
34. Tievainen T. The world social forum and global democratization: learning from
Porto Alegre. Third World Q. 2002;23(4):621–632.
35. World Health Organization (WHO). Commission on the social determinants of
health. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/en/. Accessed May
19, 2015.
36. Birn AE. Making it politic(al): closing the gap in a generation: health equity through
action on the social determinants of health. Soc Med. 2009;4(3):166–182.
37. Navarro V. What we mean by the social determinants of health. Int J Health Serv.
2009;39(3):423–441.
38. World Health Organization (WHO). Commission on the Social Determinants of
Health. Final Report. Geneva: WHO; 2008. http://www.who.int/social_determi
nants/thecommission/finalreport/en/. Accessed May 19, 2015.
39. Davey SG, Krieger N. Tackling health inequities. Br Med J. 2008;337:a1526.
doi:10.1136/bmj.a1526.
40. The Lancet. (2008). Alma-Ata: rebirth and revision. A series of 8 articles. Lancet.
2008;372(9462):865–1007.
41. Lawn JE, Lawn JE, Rhode J, Rifkin S, Were M, Paul VK, Chopra M. Alma-Ata:
rebirth and revision 1 – Alma-Ata 30 years on: revolutionary, relevant, and time to
revitalize. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):917–927.
42. National Institutes of Health. What are health disparities. http://healthdisparities.
nih.gov/whatare.html. Accessed May 31, 2006.
43. Krieger N. Defining and investigating social disparities in cancer: critical issues.
Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(1):5–14.
44. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Disparities. http://
www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/disparitiesAbout.aspx. Accessed May 19, 2013.
45. Levy BS, Sidel VW, eds. Terrorism and Public Health. 2nd ed. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press; 2011.
46. Levy BS, Sidel VW, eds. War and Public Health. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press; 2007.
47. Boseley S. Ebola: government cuts to WHO aided delays in dealing with outbreak.
The Guardian. October 9, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/09/
ebola-who-government-cuts-delays-in-dealing-with-outbreak. Accessed May 19,
2015.
48. Lazare S. “Assassination” of public health systems driving Ebola crisis, experts warn.
Common Dreams. October 16, 2014. http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/10/
16/assassination-public-health-systems-driving-ebola-crisis-experts-warn. Accessed
May 19, 2015.
49. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press; 2014.
50. Stiglitz JE. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our
Future. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co; 2012.
51. Chang H-J. 23 Things They Don’t Tell You about Capitalism. New York, NY:
Bloomsbury Press; 2013.
598 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)
Author Biography
Nancy Krieger is a professor of social epidemiology in the Department of Social
and Behavioral Sciences at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and
director of the school’s Interdisciplinary Concentration on Women, Gender, and
Health. She is an internationally recognized social epidemiologist (PhD,
600 International Journal of Health Services 45(4)