Pamintuan, Laurenz 0127

Pamintuan, Laurenz
Business Research
Table 1
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior

High School Heads in Laguna in terms of Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage (%)

Male 35 35
Female 65 65
Total 100 100
Table 2
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior

High School Heads in Laguna in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage (%)

20 – 29 0 0
30 – 37 11 11
38 – 45 30 30
46 – 52 36 36
53 above 23 23
Total 100 100
Table 3
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High

School Heads in Laguna in terms of Marital Status
Marital Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Single 17 17
Married 80 80
Widowed/er 3 3
Legally Separated 0 0
Others 0 0
Total 100 100
Table 4

School Heads in Laguna in terms of Length of Service
Length of Service Frequency Percentage (%)

6 and below 0 0
7 – 15 years 17 17
16 – 24 years 51 51
25 – 33 years 25 25
34 and above 7 7
Total 100 100
Table 5
Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High School

Heads in Laguna in terms of Educational Attainment
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Bachelor’s Degree 5 5
Master’s Degree 40 40
With Master’s Units 19 19
Doctorate Degree 12 12
With Doctor’s Units 24 24
Total 100 100
Table 6

School Heads in Laguna in terms of School Size
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Small 3 3
Medium 30 30
Large 52 52
Very Large 15 15
Total 100 100
Table 7
Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their
level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of Adaptability
Adaptability Mean Verbal Interpretation

I’m unable to express my ideas to others. 3.16 Sometimes True of Me
My impulsiveness creates problems. 2.37 Seldom True of Me

I feel that it’s hard for me to control my anxiety. 2.30 Seldom True of Me
I like to get an overview of a problem before trying 4.14 Often True of Me
to solve it.
I am satisfied with my life. 4.22 Often True of Me
I get depressed. 2.57 Sometimes True of Me

I generally expect things will turn out all right, 4.05 Often True of Me
despite setbacks from time to time.
Grand Mean: 3.26 Sometimes True of Me
Legend: “Very Seldom or Not True of Me (1.00 – 1.50)”, “Seldom True of Me (1.51 – 2.50)”, “Sometimes True of Me
(2.51 – 3.50)”, “Often True of Me (3.51 – 4.50)”, “Very Often True of Me (4.51 – 5.00)”
Table 8

level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of General Mood
General Mood Mean Verbal Interpretation

I’m a fairly cheerful person. 4.35 Often True of Me
It is a problem controlling my anger. 2.91

My approach in overcoming difficulties is to move 3.95 Often True of Me
step by step.
I feel sure of myself in most situations. 3.75 Often True of Me
I try to see things as they really are, without 3.82 Often True of Me
fantasizing or daydreaming about them.
When faced with a difficult situation, I like to 4.01 Often True of Me
collect all the information about it that I can.
I’m optimistic about most things I do. 4.23 Often True of Me
In the past few years, I’ve accomplished a little. 2.73 Sometimes True of Me
It’s hard for me to enjoy life. 1.98 Seldom True of Me
Grand Mean: 3.53 Often True of Me
Table 9
level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of Interpersonal Relationship
Interpersonal Relationship Mean Verbal Interpretation

I have strong impulses that are hard to control. 2.27 “Seldom True of Me
My close relationships mean a lot to me and to 4.29 Often True of Me
my friends.
I’m impulsive. 2.37 “Seldom True of Me
I’m able to respect others. 4.26 Often True of Me
I’ve got a bad temper. 2.23 “Seldom True of Me

I’m impatient. 2.09 “Seldom True of Me
I have good relations with others. 4.16 Often True of Me
I care what happens to other people. 4.23 Often True of Me
People think that I’m sociable. 3.72 Often True of Me
Table 10
level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of Intrapersonal Relationship
Intrapersonal Relationship Mean Verbal Interpretation

I prefer others to make decisions for me. 1.83 Seldom True of Me
It’s hard for me to understand the way I feel. 2.03 Seldom True of Me
It’s hard for me to make decisions of my own. 1.77 Seldom True of Me
When facing a problem, the first thing I do is to 3.83 Often True of Me
stop and think.
It’s hard to express my intimate feelings. 2.69 Sometimes True of Me
I’m more of a follower than a leader. 3.36 Often True of Me
Others think that I lack assertiveness. 2.83 Sometimes True of Me
I believe in my ability to handle most upsetting 3.81 Often True of Me
problems.
It’s hard for me to describe my feelings. 2.62 Sometimes True of Me
It’s difficult for me to stand up for my rights. 2.22 Seldom True of Me
Table 11
level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of Positive Impression
Positive Impression Mean Verbal Interpretation

I don’t have bad days 2.79 Sometimes True of Me
I don’t do anything bad in my life. 3.65 Often True of Me

I have not been embarrassed for anything that I’ve 2.98 Sometimes True of Me
done.
Nothing disturbs me. 2.86 Sometimes True of Me
I’m sensitive to the feelings of others. 4.16 Often True of Me

I believe I can stay on top of tough situations. 3.73 Often True of Me
I have not told a lie in my life. 2.82 Sometimes True of Me
I have not broken a law of any kind. 3.28 Sometimes True of Me
Table 12

level of Emotional Intelligence in terms of Stress Management
Stress Management Mean Verbal Interpretation

I like helping people. 4.45 Often True of Me
I’m unable to understand the way other people 2.71 Sometimes True of Me
feel.
I’m good at understanding the way other people 3.79 Often True of Me
feel.
My friends can tell me intimate things about 3.81 Often True of Me
themselves.
I tend to explode my anger easily. 2.09 Sometimes True of Me
Before beginning something new, I usually feel 2.43 Sometimes True of Me
that I’ll fail.
When trying to solve a problem, I look at each 4.26 Often True of Me
possibility and then decide on the best way.
In handling situations that arise, I try to think of as 4.08 Often True of Me
many approaches as I can.
Table 13

level of Leadership Effectiveness in terms of Decision Making
Leader as Decision Maker Mean Verbal Interpretation

Consults with others before making important 4.29
decisions. Often
Follows a logical pattern in making decisions. 4.29 Often
Faces up to and makes hard decisions. 4.24 Often
Stages and communicates decisions with pride 4.22
and decisiveness. Often
Admits mistakes when he/she makes them. 4.33 Often
Grand Mean: 4.27 Often
Legend: “Never (1.00 – 1.50)”, “Rarely (1.51 – 2.50)”, “Sometimes (2.51 – 3.50)”, “Often (3.51 – 4.50)”, “Always
(4.51 – 5.00)”
Table 14

level of Leadership Effectiveness in terms of Empowerment
Leader who empowers Mean Verbal Interpretation

Develops employees into followers. 3.80 Often
Strives to succeed by allowing followers to
4.55 Always
succeed also.
Has the full support of all those who work under
4.46 Often
him/her.
Train followers to become leaders. 4.45 Often
Allow followers to do their initiative. 4.50 Often

(4.51 – 5.00)”
Table 15

level of Leadership Effectiveness in terms of Influence
Leader as Influencer Mean Verbal Interpretation

Gets tough when necessary.
4.31 Often
Is respected by subordinates when authority is
4.31 Often
used.
Utilizes role, personality line and knowledge
4.31 Often
power in a balanced, effective manner.
Provides enough guidelines to create a cohesive
feeling among his/her subordinates. 4.35 Often
Establishes an authority line that is clear,
consistent, and appropriate for the situation. 4.33 Often
(4.51 – 5.00)”
Table 16

level of Leadership Effectiveness in terms of Positive Force
Leader as Positive Force Mean Verbal Interpretation

Can easily influence others of his enthusiasm.
4.34 Often
Energetic that others want to emulate. 4.30 Often
Reflects a positive attitude during difficult times. 4.42 Often
Is highly energetic and refuses to be “desk
bound”. 4.38 Often
Inspires others to be all they can be.
4.45 Often
(4.51 – 5.00)”
Table 17

level of Leadership Effectiveness in terms of Vision
Leader as Visionary Mean Verbal Interpretation

Articulates an inspiring vision/mission to all
employees/followers. 4.40 Often
Ties short-term work goals to inspirational
4.36 Often
missions.
Develops employees for better productivity. 4.43 Often
Prepare followers for future leadership.
4.45 Often
Always maintains an upbeat, positive attitude.
4.43 Often
(4.51 – 5.00)
Table 18
Independent Sample t – Test: Comparison on the Assessment of the
Respondents on the Level of Emotional Intelligence of Junior High
School Heads When Grouped According to Sex
Indicators Sex Mean t value p value Decision Remarks
Male 3.43 Failed to

Adaptability 0.076 0.352 Not Significant
Female 3.42 Reject Ho
Male 4.11 Failed to

General Mood 2.975 0.364 Not Significant
Interpersonal Male 3.23 Failed to

-1.770 0.139 Not Significant
Relationship Female 3.54 Reject Ho
Intrapersonal Male 2.51 Failed to

.035 .055 Not Significant
Relationship Female 2.51 Reject Ho
Male 3.43 Failed to

Positive Impression 1.708 .758 Not Significant
Male 3.89
Stress Management .538 .032 Reject Ho Significant
Female 3.82
Note: “If p value is less than or equal to the level of significance (0.05) reject Ho, otherwise failed to reject Ho.”
Table 19
One – Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA): Comparison on the Assessment of the
School Heads When Grouped According to Age
f p-
Indicators Age Mean Decision Remarks
value value
20 – 29 years old 0
30 – 37 years old 3.73

Adaptability Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 3.20 1.384 .253
Reject Ho Significant
46 – 52 years old 3.44
53 and above 3.52
30 – 37 years old 4.09

General Mood Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 3.77 .660 .578
46 – 52 years old 3.86
53 and above 3.87
30 – 37 years old 3.45

Interpersonal Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 3.23 .793 .501
Relationship Reject Ho Significant
46 – 52 years old 3.53
53 and above 3.52
30 – 37 years old 2.82

Failed to Not
Intrapersonal 38 – 45 years old 2.33 .881 .454
Relationship 46 – 52 years old 2.53
53 and above 2.57
Positive 30 – 37 years old 3.23

Impression Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 3.22 .763 .517
46 – 52 years old 3.14
53 and above 3.46

Stress 30 – 37 years old 3.91

Management Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 3.92 .395 .757
46 – 52 years old 3.78
53 and above 3.83

Table 20
School Heads When Grouped According to Marital Status
f p-
Indicators Marital Status Mean Decision Remarks
value value
Single 3.35
Married 3.44
Widowed/er 3.33 .090 .914
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.00
Married 3.84
Widowed/er 3.67 .567 .569
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 3.41
Married 3.44
Widowed/er 3.33 .026 .974
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 2.29
Failed to Not
Intrapersonal Married 2.54 1.012 .367
Relationship
Widowed/er 3.00
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 3.29
Positive Married 3.25

Widowed/er 2.83 .430 .652
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.00
Stress Married 3.81

Widowed/er 3.83 .801 .452
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Table 21
School Heads When Grouped According to Length of Service
f p-
Indicators Length of Service Mean Decision Remarks
value value
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 3.65
16 – 24 years 3.25 1.580 .199
25 – 33 years 3.52
34 and above 3.71
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 4.11
16 – 24 years 3.82 2.031 .115
25 – 33 years 3.88
34 and above 3.43

6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 3.41
16 – 24 years 3.47 .243 .866
25 – 33 years 3.32
34 and above 3.57
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 2.18
Failed to Not
Intrapersonal 16 – 24 years 2.51 1.650 .183
Relationship 25 – 33 years 2.60
34 and above 3.00
6 and below 0
Positive 7 – 15 years 3.00

16 – 24 years 3.27 .954 .418
25 – 33 years 3.26
34 and above 3.57
6 and below 0
Stress 7 – 15 years 4.12

16 – 24 years 3.84 2.334 .079
25 – 33 years 3.74
34 and above 3.57

Table 22
Respondents on the Level of Emotional Intelligence of Junior High School
Heads When Grouped According to Educational Attainment
Educational f p-
Indicators Mean Decision Remarks
Attainment value value
Bachelor’s degree 3.00 Failed to Not

Adaptability .542 .705
Master’s degree 3.40 Reject Ho Significant
with Master’s units 3.53
Doctorate degree 3.58
with Doctorate units 3.38
Bachelor’s degree 3.60
Master’s degree 3.84

with Master’s units 3.95 .723 .578


Failed to Not
Intrapersonal with Master’s units 2.53 1.510 .205
Relationship Doctorate degree 2.92
Positive Master’s degree 3.08

with Master’s units 3.37 1.446 .225
Stress Master’s degree 3.74


Table 23
School Heads When Grouped According to School Size
f p-
Indicators School Size Mean Decision Remarks
value value
Small 4.00
Adaptability Medium 3.37 Failed to Not

1.525 .213
Large 3.33 Reject Ho Significant
Very Large 3.73
Small 5.00
General Mood Medium 3.57

7.098 .000 Reject Ho Significant
Large 3.88
Very Large 4.13
Small 2.00
Interpersonal Medium 3.33

Relationship Large 3.44
Very Large 3.87
Small 1.00
Medium 2.73
Intrapersonal 5.006 .003 Reject Ho Significant
Large 2.38
Relationship
Very Large 2.80
Small 3.00
Positive
Medium 3.15 Failed to Not
Impression 2.352 .077
Very Large 3.73
Stress Small 4.67

Management 4.764 .004 Reject Ho Significant
Medium 3.72
Large 3.79
Very Large 4.13
Table 24
Independent Sample t – Test: Comparison on the Assessment of the
Respondents on the Level of Leadership Effectiveness of Junior
High School Heads When Grouped According to Sex
Indicators Sex Mean t value p value Decision Remarks
Leader as decision Male 4.31 Failed to

maker Female 4.18 Reject Ho
Male 4.66
Leader who empowers 1.733 .013 Reject Ho Significant
Female 4.48
Male 4.40
Leader as influencer .820 .030 Reject Ho Significant
Female 4.31
Leader as positive Male 4.46 Failed to

force Female 4.40 Reject Ho
Male 4.49 Failed to

Leader as visionary .300 .688 Not Significant
Table 25
High School Heads When Grouped According to Age
f p-
Indicators Age Mean Decision Remarks
value value
30 – 37 years old 4.36

Leader as
Failed to Not
decision 38 – 45 years old 4.27 .719 .543
maker
46 – 52 years old 4.11
53 and above 4.30

Leader who 30 – 37 years old 4.73

empowers 38 – 45 years old 4.70 2.788 .045 Reject Ho Significant
46 – 52 years old 4.44
53 and above 4.39
Leader as
30 – 37 years old 4.55
influencer 2.825 .043
38 – 45 years old 4.33 Reject Ho Significant
46 – 52 years old 4.17
53 and above 4.52
30 – 37 years old 4.55

Leader as Failed to Not
38 – 45 years old 4.40 1.936 .129
positive force Reject Ho Significant
46 – 52 years old 4.28
53 and above 4.61
Leader as 20 – 29 years old 0 Failed to Not

.491 .689
visionary 30 – 37 years old 4.36 Reject Ho Significant
38 – 45 years old 4.50
46 – 52 years old 4.39
53 and above 4.57

Table 26
High School Heads When Grouped According to Marital Status
f p-
Indicators Marital Status Mean Decision Remarks
value value
Leader as Single 4.24

Failed to Not
decision Married 4.21 .740 .480
maker
Widowed/er 4.67
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.59
Leader who Married 4.51

empowers Failed to Not
Widowed/er 5.00 1.479 .233
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.35
Leader as
Married 4.34
influencer
Failed to Not
Widowed/er 4.33 .006 .994
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.35
Married 4.44
Widowed/er 4.33 .198 .821
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Single 4.35
Married 4.48
Widowed/er 4.67 .430 .652
visionary Reject Ho Significant
Legally Separated 0
Others 0
Table 27
High School Heads When Grouped According to Length of Service
f p-
Indicators Length of Service Mean Decision Remarks
value value
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 4.59
Leader as
decision 16 – 24 years 4.02 4.755 .004 Reject Ho Significant
maker
25 – 33 years 4.36
34 and above 4.43
6 and below 0
Leader who 7 – 15 years 4.82

empowers 16 – 24 years 4.49 3.753 .013 Reject Ho Significant
25 – 33 years 4.56
34 and above 4.14
6 and below 0
Leader as
7 – 15 years 4.59
influencer
Failed to Not
16 – 24 years 4.25 2.267 .086
25 – 33 years 4.28
34 and above 4.57
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 4.53
16 – 24 years 4.35 .649 .586
25 – 33 years 4.44
34 and above 4.57
6 and below 0
7 – 15 years 4.71
Leader as
16 – 24 years 4.27 3.349 .022 Reject Ho Significant
visionary
25 – 33 years 4.64
34 and above 4.57

Table 28
Respondents on the Level of Leadership Effectiveness of Junior High
School Heads When Grouped According to Educational Attainment
Educational f p-
Indicators Mean Decision Remarks
Attainment value value

Leader as
decision with Master’s units 4.16 2.741 .033 Reject Ho Significant
maker
Leader who Master’s degree 4.50

empowers Failed to Not

Leader as
influencer
Failed to Not


visionary Reject Ho Significant

Table 29
Respondents on the Level of Leadership Effectiveness of Junior High
School Heads When Grouped According to School Size
f p-
Indicators School Size Mean Decision Remarks
value value
Small 4.67
Leader as Medium 4.10 Failed to Not
decision 1.641 .185
maker
Very Large 4.47
Small 5.00
Leader who Medium 4.37

empowers Large 4.56
Very Large 4.73
Small 5.00
Leader as Medium 4.30
influencer Failed to Not
Large 4.29 2.077 .108
4.47
Very Large
Small 4.67
Medium 4.37
Failed to Not
Leader as Large 4.38 .887 .451
positive force
4.60
Very Large
Small 5.00
Leader as Medium 4.50 Failed to Not

1.956 .126
visionary Large 4.35 Reject Ho Significant
Very Large 4.67


Pamintuan, Laurenz 0127

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pamintuan, Laurenz 0127

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pamintuan, Laurenz

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior

Sex Frequency Percentage (%)

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior

Age Frequency Percentage (%)

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High

Marital Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High

Length of Service Frequency Percentage (%)

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High School

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Junior High

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)

Adaptability Mean Verbal Interpretation

My impulsiveness creates problems. 2.37 Seldom True of Me

I get depressed. 2.57 Sometimes True of Me

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

General Mood Mean Verbal Interpretation

It is a problem controlling my anger. 2.91

Interpersonal Relationship Mean Verbal Interpretation

I’m able to respect others. 4.26 Often True of Me

I’ve got a bad temper. 2.23 “Seldom True of Me

Intrapersonal Relationship Mean Verbal Interpretation

Positive Impression Mean Verbal Interpretation

I don’t do anything bad in my life. 3.65 Often True of Me

I’m sensitive to the feelings of others. 4.16 Often True of Me

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Stress Management Mean Verbal Interpretation

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Leader as Decision Maker Mean Verbal Interpretation

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Leader who empowers Mean Verbal Interpretation

Allow followers to do their initiative. 4.50 Often

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Leader as Influencer Mean Verbal Interpretation

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Leader as Positive Force Mean Verbal Interpretation

Assessment of the Junior High School Heads in Laguna of their

Leader as Visionary Mean Verbal Interpretation

Indicators Sex Mean t value p value Decision Remarks

Male 3.43 Failed to

Male 4.11 Failed to

Interpersonal Male 3.23 Failed to

Intrapersonal Male 2.51 Failed to

Male 3.43 Failed to

30 – 37 years old 3.73

53 and above 3.52

30 – 37 years old 4.09

53 and above 3.87

30 – 37 years old 3.45

53 and above 3.52

30 – 37 years old 2.82

53 and above 2.57

Positive 30 – 37 years old 3.23

53 and above 3.46

Stress 30 – 37 years old 3.91

53 and above 3.83

Positive Married 3.25

Stress Married 3.81

34 and above 3.71

34 and above 3.43

34 and above 3.57