Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Gender Justice and Feminist Jurisprudence -

Assignment

Feminist Jurisprudence

Table of Contents
S No. Particulars Page No.
1 Introduction 1
2 The Evolution of Feminist Jurisprudence 2
3 Feminist jurisprudence's significance 3
4 Feminism and Feminist Jurisprudence 4
5 Three Schools of Feminism 5
6 Theories of Feminist Jurisprudence 6
7 India and Feminism 10
8 Conclusion 11
9 Reference

Table of Case Laws

S No. Case Law Citation


1
2
3
4

Introduction
Various legal doctrines have evolved over time. A hypothesis may be useful at one point in time but
not at another. As a result, many theories are developing over time. Feminist Jurisprudence, one of
the emerging and evolving idea, is a division of critical legal studies and post-modernist legal theory.
The two terms in feminist jurisprudence are, Feminist is "in favour of women," and jurisprudence is
the “study of law”. There is no clear definition of feminist jurisprudence. Different jurists offered
varying views about this. In essence, however, feminist jurisprudence is the legal philosophy that is
founded on the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. This viewpoint contends that the
law is not impartial and that men are granted power. According to this view, mainstream is
"malestream."

Feminist Legal Theory is another name for this theory. Many academics disagree with this theory.
They contend that a distinct school of legal thought deserving the name "Feminist Jurisprudence" is
not necessary. But a lot of academics disagree with this notion and agree that the idea of feminist
jurisprudence is truly significant today.

The Evolution of Feminist Jurisprudence


The more widespread women's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s, which attempted to
challenge and change the deeply ingrained patriarchal and gendered inequity that dominated
society, was directly related to the emergence of feminist jurisprudence. The goal of the women's
movement was to campaign for social and legal changes that would enhance women's potential and
lives by elevating gender and women's rights to the top of the political and cultural agenda.

The writings of feminist legal scholar Catharine MacKinnon, who contended that law was not an
impartial or objective body of rules but rather a tool for preserving and perpetuating systems of
power and oppression, were one of the major early inspirations on feminist jurisprudence. Law,
according to MacKinnon, is profoundly gendered, with men's interests and viewpoints frequently
being given preference over those of women. She called for an extensive rethink of the legal system's
underpinnings and its function in society.

Feminist jurisprudence also drew from an array of other fields and theoretical frameworks, such as
feminist theory, critical race theory, queer theory, and postcolonial theory, in order to discredit and
expose the ways in which the traditional foundations of law had been applied to maintain and
strengthen oppressive and domineering systems.

Feminist jurisprudence, notably in the fields of gender and women's rights, has had a considerable
influence on the evolution of law and legal doctrine during the course of the 20th century. It has
affected the enactment of legislation and regulations that deal with gender-based violence and
discrimination, the acceptance of various gender identities and expressions, and the inclusion of
various viewpoints and voices in legal education and the legal profession.

Feminist jurisprudence's significance


There is no moving over the fact that our society is patriarchal. Therefore, the creation of laws was a
result for males only. Essentially, the approach involved considering opinions from men. It was men's
understanding of women even when laws for women were passed for women. In essence, the law
has a male perspective on women. Many statues have these reflections that we can perceive, an
example is Marital Rape is still not recognized as a crime in India. Feminist theory is important since
it helps to address and better understand unequal and oppressive gender relations. It promotes the
goal of equality and justice while providing more opportunities for women.

Feminism and Feminist Jurisprudence


Feminist jurisprudence is distinct from feminism. The idea of feminism is not new. Feminism's past is
too old. The early advocate of feminism, Mary Wollstonecraft, published ‘A Vindication of The Rights
of Women’ in 1792, which helped establish women's rights and equality. And Charles Fourier is
credited for creating the phrase feminism.

However, feminist jurisprudence is a relatively new idea. It began in the 1960s as a subgroup of the
Post-modern Legal Theory and the Critical legal studies movement. Critical legal studies (CLS) is a
theory which states that the law is necessarily intertwined with social issues, particularly stating that
the law has inherent social biases. Proponents of CLS believe that the law supports the interests of
those who create the law. People can interpret laws any way they want, these, people, not the laws,
are the real rulers. Law is no more stable than its latest interpretation or application. Feminist legal
theory as a subgroup of CLS examines the role of gender in the law.

Three Schools of Feminism


Within feminist law, there are three major schools of thought.

1. Inequality is the emphasis of radical or dominant feminism. It claims that men have
historically ruled women as a class, resulting in gender inequality. Feminist after going
through history, realized that women have always been credited as males’ property, be it her
father, husband, or brother. Gender is a matter of power for radical feminists. Radical
feminists argue that we should stand up against traditional techniques that focus only on
males and their masculinity. They claim that sexual equality must be built based on the
differences between men and women.
2. Traditional feminism, also known as liberal feminism, holds that women are just as logical as
men and should have the same freedom to make their own decisions. Our society has always
taught women that men are immature, and you should help them walk on the correct path.
But this society has also taught men that you are intellectually more capable, and you are
the one who should take decisions about your life and also about the life of women. This is
what traditional feminism wants to talk about.
3. Another school of feminist legal thinking is cultural feminists. They concentrate on and
embrace the distinctions between men and women; this group of thinkers claims that
women value connections, whereas men value abstract principles of rights and reasoning.
This school aims to provide women’s moral voices of caring and communal ideals equal
prominence.

Theories of Feminist Jurisprudence


The evolution of feminist legal thought has been affected by many forms of feminism. Feminist
jurisprudence is not homogeneous, despite feminists’ shared commitment to equality between men
and women. Feminism is divided into four schools: liberal, radical, cultural, and postmodern, with
equality being the early theme and aim of feminists in law.

1. Liberal Feminism
2. Radical Feminism
3. Cultural Feminism
4. Post-Modern Feminism

Liberal Feminism
The origins of modern liberal feminism can be traced back to the 18th century. Individualism was a
key element of this ideology, which indicated that individuals had the right to do anything they
wanted without any interference from others. Liberal feminism is a style of feminist thought that
emphasizes women’s power to retain their equality via their actions and decisions.

Its focus is on ensuring that women’s legal and political rights are equal to men’s because, for ages,
they haven’t been treated equally, and that too without a valid reason. Liberal feminists contend that
society believes that women are naturally less intellectually and physically adept than men. Because
of this, almost every woman faces discrimination at the workplace, social gatherings, and
marketplace. Liberal feminists think that female subordination stems from social and legal barriers
that stop women from entering and succeeding in the so-called public sphere. They work to achieve
gender equality through political and legal reforms.

Radical Feminism

Radical feminism is also known as dominating feminism because it views gender equality as a matter
of male dominance over women rather than a matter of equality. Male dominance is something that
features itself in almost all domains of life. Radical feminism is a feminist perspective that advocates
for a radical reorganization of society in which male supremacy is abolished in all social and
economic circumstances.

Radical feminists regard society as fundamentally a patriarchal society in which males dominate and
oppress women without any justified reason for doing it. They also strive to eliminate patriarchy by
challenging current social norms and structures to liberate everyone from an unfair society.
Inequality affects women, but it also causes harm to everyone at large. Multiple actions have been
taken to fight against such inequality. This involves fighting against women’s sexual objectification,
raising public awareness about issues like rape and violence against women, and questioning gender
roles from the beginning.

Postmodern Feminism

According to postmodern feminism, inequality is a social construct and is a result of patriarchy, hence
it requires feminist reconstruction. The school emphasizes the process of self-definition and the
strategy for raising awareness and giving voice to the unknown women’s experiences. For example,
how a woman feels when she is touched by someone without her permission or feels when she is
not treated equally like her brother. These experiences have to be addressed and brought up on a
bigger platform. Also, both the liberal equality and difference theory ideas that women are
intrinsically different from males are rejected by postmodern feminist legal scholars. This is because
they believe that truths are numerous in number and are based on experience and perspective
rather than single truths. Feminists use a tactic in the postmodern school to look at legislation and
identify hidden biases within them. Postmodern feminists use deconstruction to show that laws
should not be rigid because they are made by humans who have biases and thus contribute to
female oppression.

Cultural Feminism

Cultural feminism focuses on the intellectual ability of a person and bases its reasoning on the same.
This school focuses on the disparities between men and women. It argues that feminism’s most
important task is to change institutions to reflect and accommodate values that they see as women’s
nurturing virtues, such as love, empathy, patience, and concern, rather than to include women into
patriarchy and prove that women are similar to men and can function like men and meet male
norms.

A feminist theory about a woman’s nature or essence tries to revalidate what cultural feminists see
as neglected female characteristics. It’s also a theory that celebrates the differences between men
and women and is okay with whatever the women have. It promotes independence and institution
building and is founded on an essentialist understanding of the differences between men and
women. They admit that men and women are different, and equality has to be brought in. But they
believe that this equality has to be brought without changing the intrinsic values that women are
born with.

India and Feminism


Even if there are existing laws in the constitution that support equality, women still face
disadvantages in the twenty-first century. Our society is still rigid and still sees women through
patriarchal lenses. Despite the Constitution's wide-ranging scope, the patriarchal and conservative
structure of Indian society has been echoed in how these clauses have been interpreted.

Our Constitution includes all the safeguards necessary to defend the interests of women. We have all
the laws, but the execution we need is still in its preliminary stage. Social justice does not imply
equality before the law on paper but rather a translation of the Constitution’s spirit and the
importance of ‘individual dignity,’ which includes women’s dignity. The Constitution, which is
considered the fountainhead of all laws, is gender sensitive. The mindset of those who drafted our
Constitution was focused on equality and placing women on an equal footing in all aspects of life.

Conclusion
Men and women have historically been seen as being not just different but also unequal in terms of
social status and power. Men are assumed to be competitive, rational, aggressive, intelligent,
political, and dominant leaders, while women are assumed to be fragile, emotional, domestic,
caretaker, and underlings. Women have been purposefully cast as opposites to men through some
clever contrasts, such as behavioural traits. Every political and economic structure, including those
involving educational and religious institutions, as well as relationships and aesthetic standards, has
historically adhered to some variation of these presumptions. Unfortunately, the law is not an
exception. As a result, societies felt the need for feminist jurisprudence, and to achieve this goal,
feminists stood up, questioned male-insight laws or practices, provided examples of illegitimate
patriarchy, and provided guidance on how to establish "equality" for women globally.

REFERENCE:

https://www.law.cornell.edu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_legal_theory

Our Lives Before the Law: Judith A. Baer

Feminist Legal Theory (An Anti-essentialist Reader): Nancy E. Dowd, Michelle S. Jacobs

You might also like