Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Results in Physics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rinp

The traveling wave solution and dynamics analysis of the parabolic law
nonlinear stochastic dispersive Schrödinger-Hirota equation with
multiplicative white noise
Chunyan Liu ∗, Da Shi, Zhao Li
College of Computer Science, Chengdu University, Chengdu, 610106, PR China

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Keywords: This article investigates the traveling wave solution of the parabolic law nonlinear stochastic dispersive
Schrödinger-Hirota equation Schrödinger-Hirota equation with multiplicative white noise, and its conclusions can be applied to optical
Dynamics analysis communication. Firstly, the equation is transformed into a nonlinear ordinary differential equation through
Phase portrait
traveling wave transformation, and its planar dynamic system is studied. The phase portraits of the equation in
Complete discriminant system
various cases are drawn by Maple software. Secondly, the traveling wave solutions of this equation are obtained
Traveling wave solution
by using the complete discriminant system theory of cubic polynomials. Finally, we draw two-dimensional
graphics, three-dimensional graphics, density plots and contour plots for the module length of some solutions
under specific parameters. In addition, the above research results can help readers have a more comprehensive
and clear understanding of this equation and its application.

Introduction
As is well known, the second-order nonlinear Schrödinger equa-
tion has a broad physical background and established a systematic
mathematical theory, with enormous and profound applications. In
recent years, high-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation models have
become one of the hotspots in many research fields, such as plasma
physics, optical communication, and so on. Numerous scholars have
studied a variety of models and obtained different forms of solu-
tions and rich conclusions by using different methods [1–15]. These
research results have driven the development of optical communica-
tion. Among them, many scholars have studied the Schrödinger-Hirota
equation by using the following methods: the Jacobi-elliptic function
method [16], the modified Jacobi-elliptic function approach [17], the
variable transformation method [18], the complete discriminant system
method [19], the expansion method and Kudryashov method [20], the
improved Sardar sub-equation method [21], the Sine–Gordon equation
method [22].
Specifically, the stochastic Schrödinger-Hirota equation (SSHE) is a
relatively novel stochastic model. Elsayed et al. [23] applied the ex-
tended minimalist equation algorithm and the model expansion format
to study the perturbed generalized SSHE in magneto-optical waveg-
uides with multiplicative white noise. Jacobi-elliptic function solution,
bright soliton, dark soliton, singular soliton, combined singular soliton,
periodic solution and rational number solution are obtained. Chen
et al. [24] studied the chaotic modes, bifurcations, and sensitivities
of the SSHE. They also used Maple software to draw phase portraits
of the dynamics system. Hasan et al. [25] used the unified Riccati
equation expansion and the sub-version of an auxiliary method to
obtain the stochastic optical soliton solutions of the parabolic nonlinear
dispersion SSHE with multiplicative white noise, gave some graphical
representations of the solutions, and observed the influence of noise
factor on the structure of the obtained solutions.
In this article, we will use planar dynamical systems and polynomial
complete discriminant systems to study the parabolic law nonlinear
dispersive SSHE with multiplicative white noise via Itô calculus as
follows [25]
𝑖𝜙𝑡 + 𝛼𝜙𝑥𝑥 + (𝛽1 |𝜙|2 + 𝛽2 |𝜙|4 )𝜙 + 𝑖𝛾(𝜙𝑥𝑥𝑥
(1)
+(𝛽3 |𝜙|2 + 𝛽4 |𝜙|4 )𝜙𝑥 ) + 𝜎𝜓𝑡 𝜙 = 0,
where 𝜙 = 𝜙(𝑥, 𝑡) is a complex-valued function, 𝛼 stands for the
coefficient of group velocity dispersion term, 𝛾 is the coefficient of
third-order dispersion term, 𝛽𝑖 (𝑖 = 1, 2, 3, 4) is the coefficient of the
nonlinear term. 𝜎 represents the strength of the noise. and 𝜓(𝑡) is a
standard Wiener process, which is defined as follows [26–28]
𝑡
𝜓(𝑡) = 𝐴(𝜁)𝑑𝜓(𝜁), 𝜁 < 𝑡, (2)
∫0
where 𝜁 is a stochastic variable.

∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yanzi_lcy@foxmail.com (C. Liu).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.107025
Received 5 August 2023; Received in revised form 22 September 2023; Accepted 25 September 2023
Available online 4 October 2023
2211-3797/© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/).
C. Liu et al. Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

This paper is organized as follows: In Section ‘‘Wave equation and (IV) If 𝛬 = 0, 𝜂1 < 0, √𝜂2 < 0 and 𝜂3 > 0, √Eq. (9) has three equilibrium
phase portraits of Eq. (1)’’, we perform the dynamics analysis of Eq. (1) 𝜂 𝜂
points 𝐒0 (0, 0), and 𝐒1 ( − 22 , 0) and 𝐒2 (− − 22 , 0). If 𝐃(0, 0) > 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0)
and draw phase portraits by using Maple software. In Section ‘‘Travel- √
𝜂
represents a center point. If 𝐃(± − 22 , 0) = 0 and the Poincaré index is
ing wave solution of the Eq. (1)’’, we obtain all traveling wave solutions √ √
𝜂 𝜂
of Eq. (1) by using the complete discriminant system theory of cubic equal to zero, 𝐒1 ( − 22 , 0) and 𝐒2 (− − 22 , 0) stand for cusp points (see
polynomials. In Section ‘‘Numerical simulation and discussion’’, we Fig. 1e).
draw two-dimensional (2D) graphics, three-dimensional (3D) graphics, (V) If 𝜂1 < √ 0 and 𝜂3 < 0, Eq. (9) has √ three equilibrium points
√ √
density plots and contour plots for the module length of some solutions −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
under specific parameters by using Maple software. Finally, we present 𝐒0 (0, 0), and 𝐒1 ( , 0) and 𝐒2 (− , 0). Therefore,
2 √2 √
the conclusion in Section ‘‘Conclusion’’. −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
if 𝐃(0, 0) < 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0) is a saddle point. If 𝐃(± , 0) > 0,
√ √ √ √
2
Wave equation and phase portraits of Eq. (1) −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐒1 ( 2
, 0) and 𝐒2 (− 2
, 0) are center points (see
Fig. 1f).
In this section, we consider the complex wave transformation of
(VI) If 𝜂√1 > 0 and 𝜂3 < 0, Eq. (9)
√has three equilibrium points
Eq. (1) √ √
−𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐒0 (0, 0), 𝐒1 ( , 0) and 𝐒2 (− , 0). Therefore, if
𝜙(𝑥, 𝑡) = 𝑢(𝜉)𝑒𝑖𝜃 , 𝜉 = 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡, 𝜃 = 𝜎𝜓(𝑡) − 𝜎 2 𝑡 + 𝜔𝑡 − 𝜇𝑥 + 𝜃0 , (3) 2 2√
√
−𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
where 𝑢 is a function with 𝜉 as variable. 𝑣, 𝜔, 𝜇, 𝜃, 𝜃0 represent speed, 𝐃(0, 0) > 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0) is a center point. If 𝐃(± , 0) < 0,
√ √ √ √
2
waves number, soliton frequency, phase component and phase con- −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
stant, respectively. 𝐒1 ( 2
, 0) and 𝐒2 (− 2
, 0) are saddle points (see
Plugging Eq. (3) into Eq. (1) to obtain the following equations, Fig. 1g).
(VII) If 𝛬 > 0, 𝜂 < 0, √ 𝜂2 < 0 and 𝜂3 > 0,√ Eq. (9) has five
(𝛾𝜇𝛽4 + 𝛽2 )𝑢5 + (𝛾𝜇𝛽3 + 𝛽1 )𝑢3 − (𝛾𝜇3 + 𝛼𝜇 2 + 𝜔 − 𝜎 2 )𝑢 + (3𝛾𝜇 + 𝛼)𝑢′′ = 0, (4) √ √
−𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
equilibrium points 𝐒0 (0, 0), 𝐒1 ( , 0), 𝐒2 (− , 0),
√ √ √2 √
2
𝛾𝛽4 𝑢4 𝑢′ + 𝛾𝛽3 𝑢2 𝑢′ − (3𝛾𝜇 2 + 2𝛼𝜇 + 𝑣)𝑢′ + 𝛾𝑢′′′ = 0. (5) −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐒3 ( , 0), and 𝐒4 (− , 0). Therefore, if
2 2 √ √
Integrating Eq. (5) once and taking the constant of integration to −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
zero, we get 𝐃(0, 0) > 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0) is a center point. If 𝐃(± , 0) < 0,
√ √ √ √
2
−𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
3𝛾𝛽4 𝑢5 + 5𝛾𝛽3 𝑢3 − 15(3𝛾𝜇2 + 2𝛼𝜇 + 𝑣)𝑢 + 15𝛾𝑢′′ = 0. (6) 𝐒1 ( , 0) and 𝐒2 (− , 0) are center
2 √ √
2 √ √
Balancing Eqs. (4) and (6), the following constraint conditions are −𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
points. If 𝐃(± , 0) < 0, 𝐒3 ( , 0), and
met √ √
2 2
−𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
3𝛾𝛽4 5𝛾𝛽3 15(3𝛾𝜇2 + 2𝛼𝜇 + 𝑣) 15𝛾 𝐒4 (− , 0) are saddle points (see Fig. 1h).
= = = . (7) 2
𝛾𝜇𝛽4 + 𝛽2 𝛾𝜇𝛽3 + 𝛽1 𝛾𝜇 3 + 𝛼𝜇 2 + 𝜔 − 𝜎 2 3𝛾𝜇 + 𝛼 (VIII) If 𝛬 > 0, 𝜂1 > 0,√ 𝜂2 < 0 and 𝜂3 > 0,√ Eq. (9) has five
√ √
Next, we choose equation Eq. (6) as the NLODE of Eq. (1), and −𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
equilibrium points 𝐒0 (0, 0), 𝐒1 ( , 0), 𝐒2 (− , 0),
organize it to obtain √ √ √2 √
2
−𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝛽4 5 𝛽3 3 3𝛾𝜇 2 + 2𝛼𝜇 + 𝑣 𝐒3 ( , 0), and 𝐒4 (− , 0). Therefore, if
𝑢′′ + 𝑢 + 𝑢 − 𝑢 = 0. (8) 2 2 √ √
5 3 𝛾 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐃(0, 0) < 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0) is a saddle point. If 𝐃(± , 0) < 0,
Assuming 𝑢′ = 𝛷, 𝜂1 = −
𝛽4
, 𝜂2 =
5𝛽3
,
2
𝜂3 = − 5(3𝛾𝜇 𝛾𝛽
+2𝛼𝜇+𝑣)
, we have √ √ √ √
2
5 3𝛽4 4 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐒1 ( , 0) and 𝐒2 (− , 0) are saddle
⎧ 𝑑𝑢 2 √ √
2 √ √
⎪ 𝑑𝜉 = 𝛷, −𝜂2 − 𝜂22 −4𝜂3 −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
⎨ 𝑑𝛷 (9) points. If 𝐃(± , 0) < 0, 𝐒3 ( , 0), and
⎪ 𝑑𝜉 = 𝜂1 𝑢(𝑢4 + 𝜂2 𝑢2 + 𝜂3 ), √ √
2 2
⎩ −𝜂2 + 𝜂22 −4𝜂3
𝐒4 (− 2
, 0) are center points (see Fig. 1i).
with the Hamiltonian system
1 2 𝜂1 6 𝜂1 𝜂2 4 𝜂1 𝜂3 2 Traveling wave solution of the Eq. (1)
𝐻(𝑢, 𝛷) = 𝛷 − 𝑢 − 𝑢 − 𝑢 = ℎ. (10)
2 6 4 2
Then, we assume that 𝐺(𝑢) = 𝜂1 𝑢(𝑢4 + 𝜂2 𝑢2 + 𝜂3 ) and 𝛬 = 𝜂22 − 4𝜂3 . Integrating Eq. (8) once to obtain
The real number root of 𝐺(𝑢) is expressed as 𝑢𝑖 (𝑖 = 0, 1, 2, 3, …). 𝐒𝑖 (𝑢𝑖 , 0) (𝑢 ) = 𝜏3 𝑢6 + 𝜏2 𝑢4 + 𝜏1 𝑢2 + 𝜏0 ,
′ 2
(11)
represents
( )the equilibrium point of Eq. (9). Assume that 𝐌(𝑢𝑖 , 0) =
0 1 𝛽 𝛽 3𝛾𝜇 2 +2𝛼𝜇+𝑣
, and its determinant is 𝐃(𝑢𝑖 , 0) = |𝐌(𝑢𝑖 , 0)| = −𝐺′ (𝑢𝑖 ). where 𝜏3 = − 154 , 𝜏2 = − 63 , 𝜏1 = 𝛾
, 𝜏0 is the constant of
𝐺′ (𝑢𝑖 ) 0 integration.
(I) If 𝛬 < 0 and 𝜂1 > 0 or 𝛬 > 0, 𝜂1 > 0, 𝜂2 > 0, and 𝜂3 > 0, Substituting 𝛹 = 𝑢2 into Eq. (11) and writing it in the following
𝐒0 (0, 0) stands for the only equilibrium point of Eq. (9). Thus, we obtain integral form
𝐃(0, 0) < 0. 𝐒0 (0, 0) represents the saddle point (see Figs. 1a, 1b).
√ 𝑑𝛹
(II) If 𝛬 > 0, 𝜂1 < 0, 𝜂2 > 0, and 𝜂3 > 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0) represents the only ±2 𝜀𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = √ , (12)
∫ 𝜀𝛹 (𝛹 3 + 𝑝𝛹 2 + 𝑞𝛹 + 𝑟)
equilibrium point of Eq. (9). Thus, we obtain 𝐃(0, 0) > 0. 𝐒0 (0, 0) stands
for the center point (see Fig. 1c). where, if 𝜏3 > 0, take 𝜀 = 1, if 𝜏3 < 0, take 𝜀 = −1, 𝜉0 is the constant of
5𝛽 2 15𝜏
(III) If 𝛬 = 0, 𝜂1 √> 0, 𝜂2 < 0, and 𝜂3 >
√0, Eq. (9) has three equilibrium integration, 𝑝 = 2𝛽3 , 𝑞 = − 15(3𝛾𝜇𝛾𝛽+2𝛼𝜇+𝑣) , 𝑟 = − 𝛽 0 , here we represent
𝜂2 𝜂 4 4 4
points 𝐒0 (0, 0), 𝐒1 ( − and 𝐒2 (− − 22 , 0). If 𝐃(0, 0) < 0, 𝐒0 (0, 0)
, 0) the complete discriminant system of 𝐹 (𝛹 ) = 𝛹 3 +𝑝𝛹 2 +𝑞𝛹 +𝑟 as follows
2 √
𝜂
represents the saddle point. If 𝐃(± − 22 , 0) = 0 and the Poincaré index ⎧ 3 𝑝2 3
√ √ ⎪𝛥 = −27( 2𝑝 − 𝑝𝑞
+ 𝑟)2 − 4(𝑞 − ) ,
𝜂 𝜂 27 3 3
is equal to zero, 𝐒1 ( − 22 , 0) and 𝐒2 (− − 22 , 0) stand for cusp points ⎨ (13)
𝑝2
(see Fig. 1d). ⎪𝐷1 =𝑞− .
⎩ 3

2
C. Liu et al. Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

Fig. 1. The phase portraits of Eqs. (9).

Case 1. When 𝛥 > 0, 𝐷1 < 0, 𝐹 (𝛹 ) = (𝛹 − 𝛶1 )(𝛹 − 𝛶2 )(𝛹 − 𝛶3 ), If 𝜀 = −1, when 𝛶2 < 𝛹 < 𝛶3 , the solution of Eq. (1) can be
here 𝛶1 , 𝛶2 , 𝛶3 represent three different real numbers, and 0 < 𝛶1 < 𝛶2 constructed from Eq. (12) as follows
√ √
√
< 𝛶3 . √ 𝛶 𝛶 sn2 ( 𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶3 −𝛶1 ) (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉 ), 𝑚) − 𝛶 𝛶
√ 1 2
√ 15 0 1 2
If 𝜀 = 1, when 𝛹 > 0 and 𝛹 < 𝛶3 , the solution of Eq. (1) can be
𝜙3 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√ √
𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶3 −𝛶1 ) (16)
𝛶1 sn2 ( 15
(𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) − 𝛶2
constructed from Eq. (12) as follows
2 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝛶
⋅𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 0) ,
√ √ √
√ √
√ 𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 ) √
√ 𝛶1 𝛶3 sn2 ( (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) 𝛶2 𝛶3
𝜙1 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√
15 𝜙4 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√
√ √
√ √ 𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶3 −𝛶1 )
𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 ) (14) (𝛶3 − 𝛶2 )sn2 ( (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) + 𝛶2 (17)
𝛶3 sn2 ( 15
(𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) + (𝛶1 − 𝛶3 ) 15

𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 2 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃0 ) 𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 2 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃0 )

⋅𝑒 , ⋅𝑒 ,
𝛶1 (𝛶2 −𝛶3 )
where 𝑚2 = 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 )
.
√ √ Case 2. When 𝛥 < 0, 𝐹 (𝛹 ) = (𝛹 − 𝛶1 )[(𝛹 − 𝛶2 )2 + 𝛶3 ], here 𝛶1 , 𝛶2 , 𝛶3
√
√ 𝛶 (𝛶 − 𝛶 )sn2 ( 𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 ) (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉 ), 𝑚) − 𝛶 (𝛶 − 𝛶 )
√ 3 1 represent real numbers, and 𝛶1 , 𝛶2 , 𝛶3 > 0. So, the solution of Eq. (1)
√ 2 15 0 2 1 3
𝜙2 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√ √ can be constructed from Eq. (12) as follows, if 𝜀 = 1,
𝛽4 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 )
(𝛶1 − 𝛶2 )sn2 ( 15
(𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) − (𝛶1 − 𝛶3 ) √
√ √
2 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃 ) √ 𝑎cn( −2𝛽 𝛶 𝛶 𝑛
⋅𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 0 , √ √ 4 1 3 (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) − 𝑎
√ 15𝑚𝑛
𝜙5 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√
2
√ √ ⋅ 𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃0 ) ,
(15) −2𝛽4 𝛶1 𝛶3 𝑛
𝑏cn( √ (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) + 𝑐
15𝑚𝑛
𝛶3 (𝛶1 −𝛶2 )
where 𝑚2 = 𝛶2 (𝛶1 −𝛶3 )
. (18)

3
C. Liu et al. Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

√
1 1 1 73 155 1 6
Fig. 2. |𝜙1 (𝑥, 𝑡)| with the following parameters: 𝛼 = 6
, 𝛾= 2
, 𝜎 = 0, 𝛽1 = 1, 𝛽2 = 6
, 𝛽3 = 18, 𝛽4 = −5, 𝑣 = 18
, 𝜔= 27
, 𝜇= 3
, 𝜃0 is any value, 𝜉0 = 0, 𝑚 = 3
, 𝛶1 = 2, 𝛶2 = 3 and
𝛶3 = 4.

√
1 1 1 73 155 1 6
Fig. 3. |𝜙2 (𝑥, 𝑡)| with the following parameters: 𝛼 = 6
, 𝛾= 2
, 𝜎 = 0, 𝛽1 = 1, 𝛽2 = 6
, 𝛽3 = 18, 𝛽4 = −5, 𝑣 = 18
, 𝜔= 27
, 𝜇= 3
, 𝜃0 is any value, 𝜉0 = 0, 𝑚 = 3
, 𝛶1 = 2, 𝛶2 = 3 and
𝛶3 = 4.

√ √
1 5 71
√ 2− 2
Fig. 4. |𝜙5 (𝑥, 𝑡)| with the following parameters: 𝛼 = 𝛾 = 𝜇 = 2
, 𝜎 = 0, 𝛽1 = 1, 𝛽2 = 0, 𝛽3 = 6, 𝛽4 = −5, 𝑣 = − 24 , 𝜔= 48
, 𝜃0 is any value, 𝜉0 = 0, 𝑛 = 1 + 2, 𝑚 = 2
and
𝛶1 = 𝛶2 = 𝛶3 = 1.

1
Fig. 5. |𝜙7 (𝑥, 𝑡)| with the following parameters: 𝛼 = 𝛾 = 𝜇 = 2
, 𝜎 = 0, 𝛽1 = 1, 𝛽2 = 0, 𝛽3 = 6, 𝛽4 = −5, 𝑣 = − 38 , 𝜔 = 17
16
, 𝜃0 is any value, 𝜉0 = 0, and 𝛶1 = 1.

4
C. Liu et al. Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

1
Fig. 6. 𝑅𝑒(𝜙7 (𝑥, 𝑡)) with the following parameters: 𝛼 = 𝛾 = 𝜇 = 2
, 𝛽1 = 1, 𝛽2 = 0, 𝛽3 = 6, 𝛽4 = −5, 𝑣 = − 38 , 𝜔 − 𝜎 2 = 17
16
, 𝜃0 is any value, 𝜉0 = 0, and 𝛶1 = 1.

if 𝜀 = −1, If 𝜀 = −1, when 𝛹 > 𝛶1 and 𝛹 < 0 or 𝛹 < 𝛶1 and 𝛹 > 0, the solution
of Eq. (1) can be constructed from Eq. (12) as follows
√ √
√ √
√ 𝑎cn( 2𝛽 𝛶 𝛶 𝑛 15𝛶1 2
√ √4 1 3 (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) − 𝑎 𝜙8 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ± + 𝛶1 ⋅ 𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃0 ) . (21)
√ 15𝑚𝑛
𝜙6 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ±√
2
√ ⋅ 𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃0 ) , 𝛽4 𝛶12 (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 )2 − 15
√ 2𝛽4 𝛶1 𝛶3 𝑛
𝑏cn( √ (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 ), 𝑚) + 𝑐
15𝑚𝑛 Case 4. When 𝛥 = 0, 𝐷1 < 0, 𝐹 (𝛹 ) = (𝛹 − 𝛶1 )2 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ), where 𝛶1
(19) and 𝛶2 represent real numbers, 𝛶1 ≠ 𝛶2 and 𝛶2 > 0.
If 𝜀 = 1, when 𝛶1 > 𝛶2 and 𝛹 > 𝛶2 or 𝛶1 < 0 and 𝛹 < 0, we can
𝛶32 +𝛶22 −𝛶1 𝛶2 √ 𝛶1 𝛶3 (𝑛2 −1) 𝛶3
only get the implicit function solution of Eq. (12)
where 𝛺 = 𝛶1 𝛶3
, 𝑛 = 𝛺± 𝛺2 + 1, 𝑎 = 2𝑛
, 𝑏 = 𝛶1 −𝛶2 − 𝑛
, √ √
1 √ 1 [ 𝛶1 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) − (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 )𝛹 ]2
𝑐 = 𝛶1 − 𝛶2 − 𝛶3 𝑛, 𝑚2 = . ±2 𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = ln , (22)
1+𝑛2 𝛶1 (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 ) |𝛹 − 𝛶1 |
Case 3. When 𝛥 = 0, 𝐷1 = 0, 𝐹 (𝛹 ) = (𝛹 − 𝛶1 )3 , here 𝛶1 stands for a when 𝜏 < 0 < 𝛶2 < 𝛶1 or 0 < 𝛶1 < 𝛹 < 𝛶2 , the implicit function solution
real number. of Eq. (12) is as follows
√ √
√ 1 [ −𝛶1 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) − (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 )𝛹 ]2
If 𝜀 = 1, when 𝛹 > 𝛶1 and 𝛹 > 0 or 𝛹 < 𝛶1 and 𝛹 < 0, the solution ±2 𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = ln . (23)
𝛶1 (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 ) |𝛹 − 𝛶1 |
of Eq. (1) can be constructed from Eq. (12) as follows
When 𝛶2 > 𝛶1 > 0, the implicit function solution of Eq. (12) is as
√ follows
15𝛶1 2 𝑡+𝜔𝑡−𝜇𝑥+𝜃 ) √ 𝛶 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) + (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 )𝛹
𝜙7 (𝑥, 𝑡) = ± + 𝛶1 ⋅ 𝑒𝑖(𝜎𝜓(𝑡)−𝜎 0 . (20) ±2 𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) =
1
arcsin 1 . (24)
−𝛽4 𝛶12 (𝑥 − 𝑣𝑡 − 𝜉0 )2 − 15 𝛶1 (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 ) 𝛶2 |𝛹 − 𝛶1 |

5
C. Liu et al. Results in Physics 54 (2023) 107025

If 𝜀 = −1, when 𝛶1 > 𝛶2 and 𝛹 > 𝛶2 or 𝛶1 < 0 and 𝛹 < 0, the [2] Li Zhao. Bifurcation and traveling wave solution to fractional biswas-arshed
implicit function solution of Eq. (12) is as follows equation with the beta time derivative. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022;160:112249.
√ √ [3] Li Zhao, Huang Chun. Bifurcation, phase portrait, chaotic pattern and optical
√ 1 [ 𝛶1 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) − (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 )𝛹 ]2 soliton solutions of the conformable Fokas–Lenells model in optical fibers. Chaos
±2 −𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = ln . (25) Solitons Fractals 2023;169:113237.
𝛶1 (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 ) |𝛹 − 𝛶1 |
[4] Khater Mostafa MA. Soliton propagation under diffusive and nonlinear effects
When 𝛹 < 0 < 𝛶2 < 𝛶1 or 0 < 𝛶1 < 𝛹 < 𝛶2 , the implicit function in physical systems; (1+1)-dimensional MNW integrable equation. Phys Lett A
solution of Eq. (12) is as follows 2023;480:128945.
[5] Han Tianyong, Li Zhao, Zhang Kun. Exact solutions of the stochastic fractional
√ √
√ 1 [ −𝛶1 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) − (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 )𝛹 ]2 long-short wave interaction system with multiplicative noise in generalized
±2 −𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = ln , (26) elastic medium. Results Phys 2023;44:106174.
𝛶1 (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 ) |𝛹 − 𝛶1 | [6] Han Tianyong, Zhao Zibo, Zhang Kun, et al. Chaotic behavior and solitary
when 𝛶2 > 𝛶1 > 0, the implicit function solution of Eq. (12) is as follows wave solutions of stochastic-fractional Drinfel’d-Sokolov-Wilson equations with
Brownian motion. Results Phys 2023;51:106657.
[7] Paul Gour Chandra, Eti Farhana Zannat, Kumar Dipankar. Dynamical analysis of
√ 1 −𝛶1 (𝛹 − 𝛶2 ) + (𝛶2 − 𝛶1 )𝛹 lump, lump-triangular periodic, predictable rogue and breather wave solutions to
±2 −𝜏3 (𝜉 − 𝜉0 ) = arcsin . (27)
𝛶1 (𝛶1 − 𝛶2 ) 𝛶2 |𝛹 − 𝛶1 | the (3 + 1)-dimensional gKP-Boussinesq equation. Results Phys 2020;19:103525.
[8] Kumar Dipankar, Hasan Md Mehedi, Paul Gour Chandra, et al. Revisiting the
Substituting the solutions
√ of Eq. (12) obtained from Eq. (22)– spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator–prey system: An analytical
Eq. (27) into 𝜙(𝑥, 𝑡) = ± 𝛹 𝑒𝑖𝜃 , we can obtain six different solutions approach. Results Phys 2023;44:106122.
of Eq. (1). [9] Kumar Dipankar, Hosseini Kamyar, et al. On some novel solution solutions
to the generalized Schrödinger-Boussinesq equations for the interaction be-
tween complex short wave and real long wave envelope. J Ocean Eng Sci
Numerical simulation and discussion 2022;7(4):353–62.
[10] Kumar Dipankar, Paul Gour Chandra, Mondal Japatosh, et al. On the propagation
In this section, we draw 2D graphics, 3D graphics, density plots and of alphabetic-shaped solitons to the (2 + 1)-dimensional fractional electrical
transmission line model with wave obliqueness. Results Phys 2020;19:103641.
contour plots for the module length of some solutions of Eqs. (1) with [11] Raza Nauman, Rani Beenish, Chahlaoui Younes, et al. A variety of new rogue
reasonable parameter values that meet the conditions by using Maple wave patterns for three coupled nonlinear Maccari’s models in complex form.
software, as shown in Figs. 2–5. Nonlinear Dynam 2023;111:18419–37.
Next, we investigated the impact of changes in noise strength pa- [12] Rafiq Muhammad Hamza, Raza Nauman, Jhangeer Adil. Nonlinear dynamics of
the generalized unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation: A graphical perspective.
rameter 𝜎 on the real part of 𝜙7 (𝑥, 𝑡). Three dimensional graphics of Opt Quantum Electron 2023;55:628.
the real part of 𝜙7 (𝑥, 𝑡) with noise strength parameter 𝜎 = 1, 2, 3, 4 were [13] Rafiq Muhammad Hamza, Jannat Nahal, Rafiq Muhammad Naveed. Sensitivity
drawn by using Maple software separately, as shown in Fig. 6. analysis and analytical study of the three-component coupled NLS-type equations
in fiber optics. Opt Quantum Electron 2023;55:627.
[14] Rafiq Muhammad Hamza, Raza Nauman, Jhangeer Adil. Dynamic study of bifur-
Conclusion cation, chaotic behavior and multi-soliton profiles for the system of shallow water
wave equations with their stability. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2023;171:113436.
In this paper, some conclusions and corresponding phase portraits [15] Rafiq Muhammad Hamza, Jhangeer Adil, Raza Nauman. The analysis of solitonic,
supernonlinear, periodic, quasiperiodic, bifurcation and chaotic patterns of
are obtained by using the theory of plane dynamical system. Ref. [25]
perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov model with full nonlinearity. Commun Nonlinear Sci
has obtained seven solutions of Eq. (1) including rational function Numer Simul 2023;116:106818.
solutions and trigonometric function solutions by using the unified [16] Aslan Ebru Cavlak, Tchier Fairouz, Inc Mustafa. On optical solitons of the
Riccati equation expansion method and the sub-version of an auxiliary Schrödinger-Hirota equation with power law nonlinearity in optical fibers.
method. This paper has used the complete discriminant system method Superlattices Microstruct 2017;105:48–55.
[17] Sharif Ahmad. Jacobi elliptic function approach to a conformable fractional
of polynomials to provide fourteen solutions of Eq. (1). Compared with nonlinear Schrödinger-Hirota equation. Partial Differential Equations Appl Math
the references, this article has added Jacobi-elliptic function solutions 2023;8:100541.
and implicit function solutions. Furthermore, we used Maple software [18] Kudryashov Nikolay A. Dispersive optical solitons of the generalized
to draw 2D graphics, 3D graphics, density plots and contour plots for Schrödinger-Hirota model. Optik 2023;272:170365.
[19] Tang Lu. Bifurcation analysis and multiple solitons in birefringent fibers with
the module length of some solutions, which can help readers have
coupled Schrödinger-Hirota equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2022;161:112383.
a more comprehensive and clear understanding of Eq. (1) and its [20] Zafar Asim, Raheel M, Asif M, et al. Some novel integration techniques to
application. explore the conformable M-fractional Schrödinger-Hirota equation. J Ocean Eng
Sci 2022;7(4):337–44.
[21] Akinyemi Lanre, Rezazadeh Hadi, Shi Qiuhong, et al. New optical solitons of per-
CRediT authorship contribution statement turbed nonlinear Schrödinger-Hirota equation with spatio-temporal dispersion.
Results Phys 2021;29:104656.
Chunyan Liu: Writing – original draft, Editing. Da Shi: Software. [22] Inc Mustafa, Aliyu Aliyu Isa, Yusuf Abdullahi, et al. Dispersive optical soli-
tons and modulation instability analysis of Schrödinger-Hirota equation with
Zhao Li: Writing – review.
spatio-temporal dispersion and Kerr law nonlinearity. Superlattices Microstruct
2018;113:319–27.
Declaration of competing interest [23] Zayed Elsayed ME, Shohib Reham MA, Alngar Mohamed EM. Disper-
sive optical solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with stochastic general-
ized Schrödinger-Hirota equation having multiplicative white noise. Optik.
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan- 2022;271:170069.
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to [24] Peng Chen, Tang Lu, Li Zhao, et al. Qualitative analysis of stochastic Schrödinger-
influence the work reported in this paper. Hirota equation in birefringent fibers with spatiotemporal dispersion and
parabolic law nonlinearity. Results Phys 2023;51:106729.
[25] Cakicioglu Hasan, Ozisik Muslum, Secer Aydin, et al. Stochastic disper-
Data availability sive Schrödinger-Hirota equation having parabolic law nonlinearity with
multiplicative white noise via Itô calculus. Optik 2023;279:170776.
No data was used for the research described in the article. [26] Secer Aydin. Stochastic optical solitons with multiplicative white noise via Itô
calculus. Optik 2022;268:169831.
[27] Mohammed Wael W, Iqbal Naveed, Ali Akbar, et al. Exact solutions of the
References stochastic new coupled konno-oono equation. Results Phys 2021;21:103830.
[28] Biswas Anjan. Stochastic perturbation of solitons for Alfven waves in plasmas.
[1] Shi Da, Rehman Hamood Ur, Iqbal Ifrah, et al. Analytical study of the dynamics Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2008;13(8):1547–53.
in the double-chain model of DNA. Results Phys 2023;52:106787.