Testing Your Rifle-Shooting Skills

by Richard Mann - Tuesday, October 4, 2016

More

SUBSCRIBE

In reality, rifle marksmanship is really a simple endeavor; just line up the sights and press the trigger without
disturbing them. We don’t have to devise new exercises to get better at rifle shooting or to measure our ability.
Good ones have been around for a long time.

Gunsite Academy founder Jeff Cooper considered Stewart Edward White a “certified master of the art” of rifle
marksmanship. White was an early 1900s American novelist and adventurer. His shooting talents were analyzed
by E. C. Crossman, a man Cooper considered one of the half-dozen truly authoritative “gun writers.” Crossman
found White knew practically nothing about the theory of rifle shooting, and he did not shoot small groups.
What White could do was keep all of his shots in a four-inch ring at a hundred steps, under all conditions of
light, speed and position.

In Townsend Whelen’s 1923 book, "The American Rifle," I discovered a hidden gem. There, Whelen outlined
White’s system of rapid-fire rifle practice. It’s an interesting approach to rifle training and includes an even
more interesting scoring system.
Targets for the Stewart Edward White rapid fire drill. The Type A target is no longer available, but modern shooters can substitute an IPSC or IDPA
target with an eight-inch Shoot-N-C target as the A-zone bull.

To try it, you’ll need to set up an ordinary military 200-yard rifle target A at 100 yards. This target had a center
black bull measuring eight inches, surrounded by a 26-inch ring and a 46-inch ring. Starting with the rifle
buttstock below the elbow, on signal the shooter fires one timed shot. This is repeated four times for a total of
five shots. Then, individual times for each shot are added up, and the target is scored based on the following
table:
Scoring: Find the total time for all shots in the left (TIME) column. The actual time must not exceed the number
in the chart. Then apply the points for each shot fired, based on the values given for each zone.

The first time I tried this drill, I used my Brockman custom Scout Rifle and managed five shots in 9.87 seconds.
I had two hits in the 8-inch ring and three in the 26-inch ring. My score was 15+15+10+10+10 (60.) My 16-
year-old son ran the drill and was more accurate but slower. At 16.6 seconds, he was scored on the 17-second
line with 8+8+8+5+5 (34.)

The key to a good score is the balance of speed and accuracy and this drill and training concept very likely laid
the foundation for Jeff Cooper’s emphasis on, and infatuation with, the “snap shot.” What I really like about
using this drill as a training tool is that it gives you no credit for near misses; you have to get inside that eight-
inch circle to score well.

I also like the importance of time because, with any application of the rifle when solving real-world problems,
time will always be a part of the equation. It’s worth noting that, on the signal, you could assume any
intermediate position you choose. Doing so might allow better hits but you’ll be penalized heavily on the time
scale.
The Stewart Edward White rapid-fire drill epitomizes snap shooting; being able to get good hits fast.

Given that the military target A went out of style years ago, and given that if you cannot keep your shots within
a 26 inch circle at 100 yards what you really need is basic rifle training, as a modern tactical alternative I
suggest a common cardboard IDPA or IPSC target. Place an eight-inch Shoot-N-C peel and stick target in the
high chest area for the A-zone. The remaining target makes up about the same surface area as the 26-inch circle
B-zone of the A target. Disregard the C zone; a shot off target is fully deserving of being described as a miss.

You could also use this drill as a qualification course. White suggested any man should be able to score about
20 points in 18 or more seconds. By that estimation we could assume twice as many points (40) should qualify
one as a marksman. 55 as sharpshooter, 65 as expert, and a perfect score of 75 would earn a distinguished rating.

I believe the system has significant practical appeal. For one, the firearm system is irrelevant; you can conduct
the drill with an AR, a pistol caliber carbine, conventional sporting rifle, Scout Rifle, or even a .22. Secondly,
this is a shoot-on-your-hind-legs-like-a-man kind of test. It’s a genuine assessment of a shooter’s ability to get
good, fast hits. Most real riflemen know that’s usually what it all comes down to anyway.
https://www.shootingillustrated.com/articles/2016/10/4/testing-your-rifle-shooting-skills/

Warne Quick Release rings are well regarded but I've been running Weaver Quad Lock rings because they're
the lightest ones I've found.

For 30mm rings the lowest and lightest I've found have been the Vortex rings.

This means the 32mm objective won't clear a full length XS rail and that's one of the reasons I took it off. I
actually ran into comb height issues (worse than what I had before) when I was running the XS rail on my Ruger
Scout. Thus, if a scout scope is in your future I'd recommend staying away from full length rails unless you need
the comb dropped.

Just received my vortex scout last week, waiting on rings to mount, and as was said, medium rings are needed,
but it's to clear eyepiece, or ocular end, not the objective, the adjustment ring makes that the big end.

mounting my vortex scout today. I used warne medium QD rings, and they seem pretty ideal in height.

Magnification 2-7 x
Objective Lens Diameter 32 mm
Eye Relief 9.45
Field of View 18.3-5.2 feet/100 yards
Tube Size 1"
Turret Style Capped
Adjustment Graduation 1/4 MOA
Travel per Rotation 15 MOA
Max Elevation Adjustment 60 MOA
Max Windage Adjustment 60 MOA
Parallax Setting 100 yards
Length 10.5 inches
Weight 12 oz

This is a decent LER optic--it is lighter than many of its more expensive alternatives, is fairly compact, seems to hold zero/has
repeatability in adjustment, and offers a good magnification range. It has very good clarity for the price range it is in, but suffers
in low light early/late hours in terms of light gathering. Eye relief feels perhaps a bit longer than advertised and varies
significantly between magnification settings. My biggest gripes with this optic are that it has a fair amount of parallax (which is
most evident shooting offhand) and there is a good amount of distortion above 6x magnification