The document discusses funding sources for international students in the US between 2003/04 and 2013/14. It shows that the two main sources were personal/family funds and funds from US colleges or universities, which together accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/04 but dropped to 84% by 2013/14. At the same time, there was substantial growth in funds from foreign governments/universities and current employers, increasing by 383% and 390% respectively. While these sources still only accounted for a small minority of funds, they became more important for foreign students over the ten-year period.
The document discusses funding sources for international students in the US between 2003/04 and 2013/14. It shows that the two main sources were personal/family funds and funds from US colleges or universities, which together accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/04 but dropped to 84% by 2013/14. At the same time, there was substantial growth in funds from foreign governments/universities and current employers, increasing by 383% and 390% respectively. While these sources still only accounted for a small minority of funds, they became more important for foreign students over the ten-year period.
The document discusses funding sources for international students in the US between 2003/04 and 2013/14. It shows that the two main sources were personal/family funds and funds from US colleges or universities, which together accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/04 but dropped to 84% by 2013/14. At the same time, there was substantial growth in funds from foreign governments/universities and current employers, increasing by 383% and 390% respectively. While these sources still only accounted for a small minority of funds, they became more important for foreign students over the ten-year period.
The document discusses funding sources for international students in the US between 2003/04 and 2013/14. It shows that the two main sources were personal/family funds and funds from US colleges or universities, which together accounted for 90% of funding in 2003/04 but dropped to 84% by 2013/14. At the same time, there was substantial growth in funds from foreign governments/universities and current employers, increasing by 383% and 390% respectively. While these sources still only accounted for a small minority of funds, they became more important for foreign students over the ten-year period.
in the US funded their studies in the years 2003/04 and 2013/14. Overall, there was a noticeable trends towards sponsorship by foreign governments, foreign universities, and current employers over the ten-year period.
First of all, the period 2003/04 to 2013/14
witnesses a significants rise in the number of international students in the US, from 572,509 to 886,052, a rise of more than 50%. Given the large increased, were there any changed in how foreign student paid for their studies?
The table shows that the two main funding
source were personal and family and US college or university, which together account for 90% of funding in 2003/2004. However, taken together, these two sources had drop to 84% by 2013/14
At the same time, there was substainal
growth in the numbers if student funded by Foreign Government or University and Current Employer, which see increases of 383% and 390% respectively. Even though they still accounted for only a small minority of funding, both resources become more important to foreign students during the period.
IELTS WRITING TASK 2
It is sometimes believed that producers and
sellers should care about reducing the amount of packaging, while others consider individuals to be responsible for this issues while performing their purchase. I think that demand for certain products is the premise for manufacturers, actions;therefore, it is primarily the consumers, who should avoid excess packaging, which will give the incentives for the companies and retailers to lessen the number of extra packing material.
One of one hand, supporters of the former
position base their opinion on the practical futility of individuals, actions regarding buying less packaged goods. This is because by using less packaging, consumers factually do not reduce its amount that already had been produced. This tons of unused extra packaging is being disposed of the same as it would have been done if it was sold. Noneless, rarely do people realize that consumers determine the behaviour of manufacturers who aim to satisfy their needs.
So next, there are people who understand the
inextricable connection between customers and producer , actions, believing that changes in business stems from buyer decision. if it were not not for the constant meeting and adapting to the demands of the consumers, many succesful company would not reach such remarkable results. Consequently, not only do the consumers command the manufacture, innovation direction, but they also can mantain a united front on the issue of lowering the huge ammount of packaging in order to contribute to social well- being in the long run.
To conclude, although people may have various
opinion, I am strongly convinced that first and foremost customers should stop buying overwrapped goods, dictating the manufacture and supermarkets supply, updated to meet consumers needs for less packaging.