Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article Image de La Ville
Article Image de La Ville
Promoting the image of a historic city for sustainable cultural tourism: the case of Tlemcen Capital of
Islamic Culture 2011
Somia Kherbouche, Abdelkader Djedid,
Article information:
To cite this document:
Somia Kherbouche, Abdelkader Djedid, (2019) "Promoting the image of a historic city for sustainable cultural tourism:
the case of Tlemcen Capital of Islamic Culture 2011", International Journal of Tourism Cities, https://doi.org/10.1108/
IJTC-06-2018-0045
Permanent link to this document:
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-06-2018-0045
Downloaded on: 08 June 2019, At: 15:16 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 84 other documents.
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
examine the changing perception of the city’s image, assess its durability and determine its relationship with based at the Universite Abou
the development of sustainable cultural tourism. Bekr Belkaid Tlemcen,
Design/methodology/approach – This research is tested by an empirical study that combines a qualitative Tlemcen, Algeria.
and a quantitative approach. The qualitative study is based on semi-directive interviews, whereas quantitative
study is based on statistics from the Wilaya Tourism Department.
Findings – The results of this study indicate first of all that the perception of the city’s image by the
inhabitants is not static and that it follows the same process of evolution of the perception of the image by
tourists but in relation to other factors such as awareness and age. The second result shows that the
sustainability of the image must be verified both inside and outside to achieve sustainable cultural tourism.
Originality/value – This study is in line with previous research with another point of view on the city’s image
and another case study which is the historical city of Tlemcen. It serves to examine the evolution of the
perception of the city’s image produced by the event and to assess its sustainability.
Keywords Event, Durability, City image, Sustainable cultural tourism, Tlemcen
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Today, many historic cities suffer from decay and neglect and have lost their competitive
functions and capacities (Richards and Wilson, 2006; Barrera-Fernández, 2017).
To ensure their sustainability, these cities rely on cultural tourism as an alternative for their
regeneration. This combination of culture and tourism has become one of the most important in
human history (Richards, 2010). Cultural tourism is seen as a major generator of economic
wealth and a source of funding for heritage conservation (Picard and Robinson, 2006; Alvarez,
2010). However, cultural tourism is far from being a simple economic activity; it is a complex and
dynamic phenomenon (Newby, 1994; Salazar, 2012) with positive results and negative
consequences. On one hand, it offers new opportunities and prospects for the economic revival
of historic cities (Ashworth, 1995; McKercher et al., 2005), thus stimulating the preservation of
heritage and the transmission of cultural traditions (Godfre and Clarke, 2000), and, on the other
hand, it can prove to be harmful and negative for these cities ( Jansen-Verbeke, 1998) through
overexploitation, museification, banalisation, etc. (Russo, 2002; Girard and Nijkamp, 2009).
The “tourism/culture” association described by McKercher et al. (2005) as conflict and
Received 11 June 2018
cooperation has been the subject of several studies that deal with the problem. In this sense, the Revised 1 September 2018
development of cultural tourism based on the guiding principles of sustainable development is an 25 September 2018
indispensable strategy for the sustainability of historic cities (UNWTO, 1995). The objective is to 30 September 2018
Accepted 5 October 2018
have a symbiosis between culture and tourism and not to favour commercial values over
© International Tourism Studies
conservation values (Newby, 1994). Association
DOI 10.1108/IJTC-06-2018-0045 Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 2056-5607 j INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOURISM CITIES
Indeed, the application of the concept of sustainable tourism development has become a central issue
in the economy of historic cities because it makes it possible to face the challenges of sustainability
and ensure the balance between social cohesion, heritage preservation and economic development
(Butler, 1999; UNWTO, 1995; Salazar, 2012; Ferri and Maturo, 2013; Nasser, 2003).
On the contrary, the development of tourism depends primarily on the attractiveness of the city
and its ability to attract attention, make tourists dream and attract them (Genaille, 2009).
Attractiveness is sometimes presented as synonymous with competitiveness because of
increasing competition between cities as destinations (Cusin and Damon, 2010). It has become
an important concern and an omnipresent notion in tourism policies (Genaille, 2009). For
historic cities, tangible and intangible heritage is an attractive force, an important landmark and
one of the indispensable identity factors for the development of cultural tourism (Brokensha and
Gruldberg, 1992; Simons, 1996; Russo and van der Borg, 2002; Girard and Nijkamp, 2009).
Monuments and the arts, in general, because of their historical, aesthetic and cultural values
give singularity to tourist destinations. In addition to this, gastronomy, traditions, music and
crafts provide more of a driving force for cultural and historical destinations (Cohen,1988;
Ashworth and Tunbridge, 1990; Prentice, 1993; Murphy et al., 2000; Barrera-Fernández et al.,
2017) and present themselves as a source of values including economic values (MacCannell,
1976; Richards and Palmer, 2010).
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
Moreover, the attractiveness of the city depends on the image it conveys and the elements
that distinguish it from other cities and shape its character. The image of a city has a direct
impact on its ability to develop tourism. It can be positive and attractive, encouraging the
development of tourism activity, and it can be negative and weak, slowing down its
development (Kotler et al., 1993).
The city’s image, reputation and identity have become assets for the development of cities in a
competitive context (Pasquinelli, 2014). This is a key factor for people who use or want to use the
city, whether they are investors, visitors or residents (Kavaratzis, 2007). As a result, many cities
are working to improve and promote their images (Morgan et al., 2002) through various means,
including events. For historic cities, cultural events and festivals, in particular, are used to highlight
the culture and identity of the place (Liu and Chen, 2007; Arandelovic, 2015). Creating cultural
experiences as attractions has become a key element for improving the images of historic cities
(Barrera-Fernández et al., 2017). However, for some researchers, the effects of cultural events on
historic cities are rather ephemeral and limited, although efforts have been made to sustain post-
event effects (Zhang and Zhao, 2009).
This paper aims to contribute to studies made on the image of the city, in general, and the
promotion of the image through events, in particular, by reporting the experience of the city of
Tlemcen, a historic city of North West Algeria that saw its image changed through an event it
hosted in 2011 “Tlemcen Capital of Islamic Culture”. The case study will consider the city not only
as a destination perceived from the outside but also as an inhabited city perceived from the
inside. The objective is to assess the sustainability of the image of the city produced by the event
both inside and outside the city and to see its relationship with sustainable cultural tourism.
To do this, the work is organised into three essential parts, a theoretical part on the image of the
city through literature reviews to determine the elements that make up this image and strategies
for its promotion. The second part is a case study of the city of Tlemcen through a feedback on
the event Tlemcen capital of Islamic Culture 2011, and the third part is a discussion of the results
to verify the evolution of the perception of the image and assess its sustainability.
Literature review
City image
The city image is one of the most widespread subjects in the field of tourism studies, given its
importance ( Jansson, 2003). It has been treated mainly as a destination by assessing visitor’s
perception (Chon, 1990), and very little as an image perceived by non-visitors (Stylidis and
Cherifi, 2018).
There is a third component to the image when talking about the city as a tourist destination:
1. the conative image based on intentions to visit or revisit the city (Manyiwa et al., 2018; Stylidis
and Cherifi, 2018).
Indeed, the image as it is composed (cognitive and affective) refers to two categories: an image
transmitted and an image received:
1. The image emitted is a transmitted image, it depends on the agents who take part in its
formation that is to say emission tools (media, advertising, photographs, events, etc.)
(Gartner, 1994). Image formation factors play a very important role in the perception of the
city and the quality of the transmitted image. Indeed, this image can be organic (informal)
linked to non-commercial sources of information (media, personal reading, etc.) (Busby
et al., 2013); it can be an induced image in the case of a commercial promotion through
formal sources such as films, advertisements, travel agencies, etc. or it can be complex or
autonomous via direct experiences and personal travel (Ateljevic, 2001; Gartner, 1989).
2. The received image is an image related to the perception and interpretation of the emitted
image. In this category, there are two types of image receivers: indoor receivers, city residents
(inhabitants or others), and outdoor receivers, coming from outside the city (tourists).
It is also important to say that the image received by a visitor is not final because there is a process
of image formation (before, during and after) in relation to the “visit” factor (Tasci et al., 2007).
The question that can be asked here is:
RQ1. Does the perception of the city image follow the same evolution process (before, during and
after) for the inhabitant as for the tourist and in relation to what factors will this image evolve?
Promoting the image of a historic city: when the cultural event is at the heart of promotion
Nowadays, the city is considered a product to be developed and promoted to attract tourists,
investors and sometimes even new residents (Ashworth and Voogd, 1988). Image promotion has
become essential to identify, distinguish and highlight the assets of each city (Paddison, 1993; Cai,
2002). The concept is broad and implies several actions including making, creation, design, change,
etc., of the image of the city (Genaille, 2009). This image cannot be the same everywhere because
each city is different from the other, and this difference is due to the historical, cultural, social, economic
context, etc. The image changes its theme according to the specificities and vocation of each city.
Promotion has two fundamental objectives: the first is to make the inhabitants appreciate the city
from the inside, that is, to create an image through which the inhabitants can identify themselves
and acquire a sense of belonging (Capel, 1975; Marcotte and Bourdeau, 2010). The second
Planned events are spatio-temporal phenomena (Getz, 2007), limited in time and space. This
observation has led actors in historic cities to seek to perpetuate the effects of cultural events
because the success of an event is measured in the long term (Gravari-Barbas and Jacquot, 2007).
The question here is:
RQ2. Is city image produced by cultural events durable or ephemeral and what is the impact of
this durability on the development of sustainable cultural tourism? (The word durability in
the question is synonymous with continuity).
Plate 1 The Minaret of El Mansourah (Merinid and Zianid thirteenth century) during and after
its restoration
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
Source: Authors
Source: Authors
Methods
This study attempts to develop two lines of thoughts: the evolution of the perception of the city’s
image of Tlemcen produced by the event and the evaluation of its sustainability. The objective is
twofold. The first is to synthesise the factors involved in the evolution of the perception of the city’s
image on both the internal and external levels of the city, and the second is to propose on the
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
basis of previous work and the experience of the city of Tlemcen the relationship between the
perception of the city’s image, the durability of the image and the development of sustainable
cultural tourism.
This relationship is tested by an empirical study that combines a qualitative and a quantitative
approach. Nevertheless, this approach allows us to deduce some results that may help the
development of sustainable cultural tourism in historic cities.
The qualitative study is based on semi-directive interviews, and quantitative study is based on
statistics from the Wilaya Tourism Department.
For the first part, the verification of the evolution of the perception of the city’s image of Tlemcen
called for the interview, which seemed the most logical way to interact with tourists and
inhabitants and to understand through their responses and reactions not only cognitive but also
affective perceptions of the image.
On the internal side, the category interviewed composed of a panel of three groups (7–17, 18–50
and 50–70 year old), each age category composed of 50 people, and, in total, 150 people were
interviewed. The sampling method used is a non-probabilistic quota method (Pires, 1997) with age
as the factor and the sample size (n) is taken with respect to Cochran’s formula (Bartlett et al., 2001):
n ¼ ðtÞ2 ðpÞðqÞ=d2 ;
where t is a confidence level according to the normal law for a 95% confidence level, t ¼ 1.96; p is
the estimated proportion of the population (when unknown, p ¼ 0.5 is used); q ¼ 1−p; d is a margin
of error tolerated which in this case is 8 per cent.
Thus, the n can be calculated as follows:
n ¼ ð1:96Þ2 ð0:5Þð10:5Þ=ð0:08Þ2 ;
n 150:
The interview was semi-directive and focused on two main points:
1. Knowledge of the built heritage of the city of Tlemcen and its historical and economic
importance: in order to assess the degree of awareness of the inhabitants towards their
heritage as a product to be valued in a historic city.
2. Change of the image of the city: this information is important to understand if the image perceived
by the inhabitants of the city of Tlemcen has changed, evolved or remained stable after the event.
On the external side, it is clear that the evaluation of the perception of the image of the city can be
evaluated using statistics of the number of tourists. However, what is also important to know are
indicator that will also be considered given its importance in assessing the attractiveness of cities
(Paddison, 1993; Richards and Wilson, 2004).
These two indicators are based on statistics from the Tlemcen Wilaya Tourism Department.
Results
Evolution of the perception of the city’s image of Tlemcen
Internally, as an inhabited city. To check the evolution of the perception of the image of the city of
Tlemcen by the inhabitants, the question that was asked to the inhabitants of the city is as follows:
■ Did you know the heritage and precisely the architectural heritage of the city of Tlemcen before
the event? And do you know it now?
The results shown in Figure 1 reveal the following.
For the first age category, most children between 7 and 17 years of age did not know their city’s
heritage before the event. However, the results of the interview show that the figures changed
considerably afterwards, but this change is not due only to the event because, according to the
74%
70%
67%
62%
46%
15%
90%
Beautiful
80%
Dynamic
70%
Attractive
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
From 7 to 17 years From 18 to 50 years From 50 to 70 years
old old old
Source: Authors
image of destination and constitute an evidence for the development of cultural tourism.
178,297
156,300 154,800
139,380 136,630 136,581 144,980
125,995 123,499 128,009 127,137 128,406
119,980
104,737
1,675 1,672 1,889 2,211 3,307 3,401 2,117 3,280 3,503 3,542 3,800 5,972 7,789 7,476 5,708 4,570 4,230
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
What are the reasons for Work, trade, tourism and inviting friends Work, seminars and meetings and invitation of friends
your visit to Tlemcen?
Is this your first visit? 70% (35/50 people) answered no 94% (47/50 people) answered yes
How did you find the city? Beautiful, clean, quiet, secure, interesting Beautiful, rich and diverse heritage, good food, friendly people,
historical sites, friendly and welcoming people interesting museums and quality accommodation facilities
Source: Authors
1,800
1,605
1,600
1,424
1,400 1,280
1,146 1,465
1,200 1,354
1,000 1,195
800
600 600
400
200
Number of beds
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: Tourism Department of the Wilaya of Tlemcen
Figure 5 Curves of the evolution of the number of national and foreign tourists in Tlemcen
National tourists
Foreign tourists
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: Tourism Department of the Wilaya of Tlemcen
600
498 498
500
400
300
200
100
0 Number of beds
0
Before 2011 In 2011 After 2011
Source: Tourism Department of the Wilaya of
Tlemcen
Awareness
Sustainable cultural
Involvement
tourism Investment
Resource creation
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
Environmental:
Economic:
preservation
tourism development
heritage
Attractiveness
Source: Authors
The experience of the city of Tlemcen illustrates that the Tlemcen event, “Capital of Islamic
Culture”, was the bearer of projects that made the city shine especially on the internal level. The
study also shows that the promotion of the city’s image combined with events alone is not
durable. The image of a destination is like a living being, so in order for it to develop, it has to be
nourished abundantly by events, mediation, intervention, etc.
References
Abadie, L. (1994), Tlemcen au passé retrouvé, Jacques Gandini, Nice.
Agbabiaka, H.I. (2016), “Physical planning implication of Eyo festival in Lagos Island, Nigeria”, Cogent Social
Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
Alvarez, M.D. (2010), “Creative cities and cultural spaces: new perspectives for city tourism”, International
Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 171-5.
André, C. (1987), “Changer l’image d’une ville”, Politiques et management public, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 51-64.
Anholt, S. (2006), “The Anholt-GMI city brands index: how the world sees the world’s cities”, Place Branding
and Public Diplomacy, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 18-31.
Arandelovic, B. (2015), “Graz, UNESCO city of design and historical heritage”, Cities, Vol. 43, pp. 78-91.
Ashworth, G.J. (1995), “Managing the cultural tourist”, in Ashworth, G.J. and Dietvorst, A. (Eds), Tourism and
Spatial Transformations: Implications for Policy and Planning, CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 265-84.
Ashworth, G.J. and Tunbridge, J.E. (1990), The Tourist-historic City, Belhaven Press, London and
New York, NY.
Ashworth, G.J. and Voogd, H. (1988), “Marketing the city: concepts, processes and Dutch applications”,
Town Planning Review, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 65-79.
Ferri, B. and Maturo, A. (2013), “Built cultural heritage and urban development: elements for a cultural
planning in Pescara city (Italy)”, Built Heritage: Monitoring Conservation Management, Department of
Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, University Chieti-Pescara, pp. 506-14.
́ H.C. (2002), “Destination image: towards a conceptual framework”,
Gallarza, M.G., Saura, I.G. and Garcıa,
Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 56-78.
Gartner, W.C. (1989), “Tourism image: attribute measurement of state tourism products using
multidimensional scaling technique”, Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 15-19.
Gartner, W.C. (1994), “Image formation process”, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, Vol. 2 Nos 2-3,
pp. 191-216.
Genaille, N. (2009), “Le concept de flagship, un projet d’image en direction de l’attractivité”, L’Attractivité des
territoires: regards croisés 2009 Actes des séminaires, Paris, pp. 111-15.
Ger, G. (1991), “Country image: perceptions, attitudes, associations, and their relationships to context”, in
Dholakia, R.R. and Bothra, K.C. (Eds), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Marketing and
Development, New Delhi, pp. 390-8.
Gravari-Barbas, M. and Veschambre, V. (2005), “S’inscrire dans le temps et s’approprier l’espace: enjeux de
pérennisation d’un événement éphémère. Le cas du festival de la BD à Angoulême”, Les Annales de
géographie, Vol. 643, pp. 285-306.
l’instrumentalisation des espaces et des temporalités événementiels à Lille et Gênes”, Géocarrefour, Vol. 82
No. 3, available at: https://journals.openedition.org/geocarrefour/2217 (accessed 11 August 2018).
Herzog, H. (1963), “Behavioral science concepts for analyzing the consumer”, in Billis, P. (Ed.), Marketing and
the Behavioral Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 76-86.
ISESCO (2011), “Tlemcen as Islamic Culture Capital of the Arab Region for 2011”, available at: www.isesco.org.
ma/blog/2015/06/11/tlemcen-as-islamic-culture-capital-of-the-arab-region-for-2011/ (accessed 20 August 2018).
Jansen-Verbeke, M. (1998), “Tourismification of historical cities”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 25 No. 3,
pp. 739-42.
Jansson, A. (2003), “The negotiated city image: reproduction and change through urban consumption”,
Urban Studies, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 463-79.
Jenkins, O. (1999), “Understanding and measuring tourist destination images”, International Journal of
Tourism Research, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-15.
Kavaratzis, M. (2007), “City marketing: the past, the present and some unresolved issues”, Geography
Compass, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 695-712.
Kotler, P., Haider, D. and Rein, I. (1993), Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to
Cities, States, and Nations, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Ledrut, R. (1973), les images de la ville, Anthropos, Paris.
Liu, Y. and Chen, C. (2007), “The effects of festivals and special events on city image design”, Frontiers of
Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 255-9.
Lynch, K. (1960), The Image of the City, The MIT Press, London.
McKercher, B., Ho, P.S.Y. and du Cros, H. (2005), “Relationship between tourism and cultural heritage
management: evidence from Hong Kong”, Tourism Management, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 539-48.
MacCannell, D. (1976), The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class, Macmillan, London.
Manyiwa, S., Priporas, C.V. and Wang, X.L. (2018), “Influence of perceived city brand image on emotional
attachment to the city”, Journal of Place Management and Development, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 60-77.
Marçais, W. and Marçais, G. (1903), in Fontemoing, A. (Ed.), Les monuments arabes de Tlemcen, Paris.
Marcotte, P. and Bourdeau, L. (2010), “La promotion des sites du Patrimoine mondial de l’UNESCO:
compatible avec le développement durable?”, Management et Avenir, Vol. 4 No. 34, pp. 270-88.
Morgan, N., Pritchard, A. and Pride, R. (2002), Destination Branding: Creating the Unique Destination
Proposition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Nasser, N. (2003), “Planning for urban heritage places: reconciling conservation, tourism, and sustainable
development”, Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 467-79.
Newby, P.T. (1994), “Tourism: support or threat to heritage”, in Ashworth, G.J. and Larkham, P.J. (Eds),
Building a New Heritage: Tourism, Culture, and Identity, Routledge, London.
Paddison, R. (1993), “City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration”, Urban Studies, Vol. 30
No. 2, pp. 339-49.
Picard, D. and Robinson, M. (2006), “Remaking worlds: festivals, tourism and change”, in Picard, D. and
Robinson, M. (Eds), Festivals, Tourism and Social Change: Remaking Worlds, Tourism and Cultural Change,
New York, NY, Vol. 8, pp. 3-31.
Pires, A. (1997), “Echantillonnage et recherche qualitative: essai théorique et méthodologique”, available at:
www.dphu.org/uploads/attachements/books/books_1837_0.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
Prentice, R. (1993), “Motivations of the heritage consumer in the leisure market: an application
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
of the Manning-Haas demand hierarchy”, Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 15 No. 4,
pp. 273-90.
Richards, G. and Palmer, R. (2010), Eventful Cities: Cultural Management and Urban Revitalization,
Elsevier, Oxford.
Richards, G. and Wilson, J. (2004), “The impact of cultural events on city image: rotterdam, cultural capital of
Europe 2001”, Urban Studies, Vol. 41 No. 10, pp. 1931-51.
Richards, G. and Wilson, J. (2006), “Developing creativity in tourist experiences: a solution to the serial
reproduction of culture?”, Tourism Management, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 1209-23.
Roche, M. (1994), “Mega events and urban policy”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
Russo, A.P. (2002), “ ‘The vicious circle’ of tourism development in heritage cities”, Annals of Tourism
Research, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 165-82.
Russo, A.P. and van der Borg, J. (2002), “Case study planning considerations for cultural tourism: a case
study of four european cities”, Tourism Management, Vol. 23 No. 6, pp. 631-7.
Salazar, N.B. (2012), “Community-based cultural tourism: issues, threats and opportunities”, Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 9-22.
Simons, M.S. (1996), “Protection of heritage sites – Simons actions”, in Prosse, R.G. (Ed.), Bureau of Tourism
Research, Tourism and Hospitality Research: Australian and international perspectives, Canberra,
pp. 519-534.
Stylidis, D. and Cherifi, B. (2018), “Characteristics of destination image: visitors and non-visitors’ images of
London”, Tourism Review, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 55-67.
Tasci, A.D.A., Gartner, W. and Cavusgil, S. (2007), “Conceptualization and operationalization of destination
image”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 194-223.
Xie, K.L. and Lee, J.-S. (2013), “Toward the perspective of cognitive destination image and destination
personality: the case of Beijing”, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 538-56.
Zhang, L. and Zhao, S.X. (2009), “City branding and the Olympic effect: a case study of Beijing”, Cities, Vol. 26
No. 5, pp. 245-54.
Corresponding author
Somia Kherbouche can be contacted at: lasoumi989@hotmail.com
Downloaded by Doctor Somia KHERBOUCHE At 15:16 08 June 2019 (PT)
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com