Performance is not considered in employee appraisals at this organization. The most productive workers are told that those due for promotion will receive the top score regardless of whether they work or not, while hard workers must wait until next year for fair evaluation. However, department and management changes often occur, making promises of future promotion unreliable. The employee appraisal system is unjust, as only a select few receive top marks and promotions regardless of actual performance. Highly productive employees are given only demanding tasks, and performance reviews are used to excuse dropping employees in favor of management favorites. Losses from dismissing honest hard workers go uncovered.
Performance is not considered in employee appraisals at this organization. The most productive workers are told that those due for promotion will receive the top score regardless of whether they work or not, while hard workers must wait until next year for fair evaluation. However, department and management changes often occur, making promises of future promotion unreliable. The employee appraisal system is unjust, as only a select few receive top marks and promotions regardless of actual performance. Highly productive employees are given only demanding tasks, and performance reviews are used to excuse dropping employees in favor of management favorites. Losses from dismissing honest hard workers go uncovered.
Performance is not considered in employee appraisals at this organization. The most productive workers are told that those due for promotion will receive the top score regardless of whether they work or not, while hard workers must wait until next year for fair evaluation. However, department and management changes often occur, making promises of future promotion unreliable. The employee appraisal system is unjust, as only a select few receive top marks and promotions regardless of actual performance. Highly productive employees are given only demanding tasks, and performance reviews are used to excuse dropping employees in favor of management favorites. Losses from dismissing honest hard workers go uncovered.
Performance is not considered in employee appraisals at this organization. The most productive workers are told that those due for promotion will receive the top score regardless of whether they work or not, while hard workers must wait until next year for fair evaluation. However, department and management changes often occur, making promises of future promotion unreliable. The employee appraisal system is unjust, as only a select few receive top marks and promotions regardless of actual performance. Highly productive employees are given only demanding tasks, and performance reviews are used to excuse dropping employees in favor of management favorites. Losses from dismissing honest hard workers go uncovered.
The most productive workers are informed that those who
are due for promotion, will get Top score irrespective of whether they work or not, and you will be considered next year. And the following year never arrives. Boss changes, department changes. Who can assure for future? Correct score should be given at righ time. Present boss will not take any responsibility of loss happened in past. They find execuse to not give score in this year. Even if their work is visible through records, diligent workers still endure consequences. CCL is viewed as a chance to drop the employee. The given output and efficiency in that year and previous years is irrelevant. CCL's policy is based on necessity rather than pleasure. Performance should be evaluated rather than absence. Other employees are absent for many more days, when compared. But CCL sounds good to highlight absence. However, Performance is to be reported on a pro rata basis in accordance with the even weekly planner's guideline. A system of performance appraisal exists that is unjust. A select few receive top marks and promotions. Performance is not taken into account. Only the most demanding tasks are assigned to highly productive workers. CCL or transfers are used as an excuse to drop an employee and pick a favorite at the time of evaluation. Who is going to cover the loss and contributions of an honest employee?