Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Cause-effect analysis

(fish-bone diagram)
DR. DANIEL ODULUSI
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
A cause-and effect diagram is a chart showing the different categories of problem causes.
This analysis tool helps to organize information by showing links between events and their
potential or actual causes and provides a means of generating ideas about why the problem is
occurring and possible effects of that cause.
This tool allows problem solvers to broaden their thinking and look at the overall picture of a
problem.
Cause-and-effect diagrams/tools can reflect either causes that block the way to the desired
state or helpful factor needed to reach the desired state.
Types of Cause-and-Effect Diagram
There are mainly two tools/diagrams to graphically organize ideas for a cause-and-effect
analysis. They vary in how potential causes are organized:
A) By category: called a fish bone diagram (for its shape) or Ishikawa diagram (for the man who
invented it),
b) As a chain of causes: called a tree diagram.
The choice of tool for cause–effect analysis depends on the team’s need. If the team tends to
think of causes only in terms of people, the fish bone diagram, organized around categories of
cause, will help to broaden their thinking. A tree diagram, however, will encourage team
Members to explore the chain of events or causes
Fishbone Diagram
The fish bone diagram helps teams to brainstorm about possible causes of a problem,
accumulate existing knowledge about the causal system surrounding that problem, and group
causes into general categories. It shows the relationships between a problem and its possible
causes.
It was invented/Developed by Prof. Kaoru Ishikawa(1953),1968,1960’s
It is Also known as…
Herring bone diagram
Ishikawa diagrams
Main Stages of developing the fishbone
diagram
1. Define the problem statement
2. Bring together a team of staff who are appropriate to analyse the problem (a
multidisciplinary team)
3. Brainstorm the possible causes
4. Decide a set of categories for grouping the causes (often these are staff, patient, resources,
service area and systems)
5. Write the causes on the spines of the fish under the appropriate category
Cause-effect “skeleton”
Children don’t improve in the ward
Advantages and disadvantages
The tree diagram
A second type of cause-and-effect analysis is a tree diagram, which highlights the chain of
causes. The tree diagram is a graphic display of a simpler method known as the Five Why’s.
It displays the layers of causes, looking in-depth for the root cause. It starts with the effect and
the major groups of causes and then asks for each branch:
Why is this happening?
•What is causing this?
Sketch of a tree diagram
Example of a tree diagram
Example:
Question 1:Why did the patient get the incorrect medicine?
Answer 1: Because the prescription was wrong.
Question2: Why was the prescription wrong?
Answer 2:Because the doctor made the wrong decision.
Question 3:Why did the doctor make the wrong decision?
Answer 3: Because he did not have complete information in the patient’s chart.
Question 4:Why wasn’t the patient’s chart complete?
Answer 4: Because the doctor’s assistant had not entered the latest laboratory report.
Question 5:Why hadn’t the doctor’s assistant charted the latest laboratory report?
Answer 5: Because the lab technician telephoned the results to the receptionist,who forgot to tell the assistant.
Solution: Develop a system for tracking lab reports.
Conclusion:
Remember that cause-and effect diagrams represent hypotheses about causes, not facts. Failure
to test these hypotheses—treating them as if they were facts—often leads to implementing the
wrong solutions and wasting time.
To determine the root cause(s),the team must collect data to test these hypotheses. The
“effect” or problem should be clearly articulated to produce the most relevant hypotheses
about cause.
If the “effect” or problem is too general or ill defined, the team will have difficulty focusing on
the effect, and the diagram will be large and complex. It is best to develop as many hypotheses
as possible so that no potentially important root cause is overlooked.
Be sure to develop each branch fully. If this is not possible, then the team may need more
information or help from others for full development of all the branches.
End
Any questions

You might also like