Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download Ebook Ebook PDF Mental Health in Social Work A Casebook On Diagnosis and Strengths 2nd Edition PDF
Full Download Ebook Ebook PDF Mental Health in Social Work A Casebook On Diagnosis and Strengths 2nd Edition PDF
Preface xii
Part One: Assessment
vii
viii Contents
Onset 28
The Course of Autism Spectrum Disorder 30
Interventions 31
Special Education 31
Family Education, Support, and Involvement 32
Behavioral Management 32
Medication 32
Social Skills Training 33
Complementary and Alternative Treatments 33
Interventions for Adolescents and Adults 33
Critical Perspective 34
4. Neurodevelopmental Disorders 39
Prevalence and Comorbidity 40
Assessing ADHD 40
Biopsychosocial Risk and Resilience Influences 43
Onset 43
Course and Recovery 45
Intervention 46
Psychosocial Intervention 46
Medication 47
Critique 47
Critical Perspective 48
xii
Preface xiii
the importance of the environmental context, interventions address the broad nature of
the concerns that people bring to social work professionals. For instance, if socioeconomic
problems, such as lack of health insurance and unemployment, are part of the client’s pre-
senting problems, then intervention will appropriately address these concerns, as they are
critical to a person’s well-being and healthy functioning.
The Council on Social Work Education has implemented educational policy and accred-
itation standards that involve competencies and the practice behaviors associated with them
that social workers are to learn. As a result, Mental Health in Social Work has become part of
the Advancing Core Competencies series. The following table demonstrates how the competen-
cies and practice behaviors are an integral part of this book. Additionally, each chapter includes
critical thinking questions that exemplify the competences and practice behaviors.
In summary, this book takes a case study approach, with students applying evidence-
based information on mental disorders to build their social work competency in terms of
assessment and treatment of mental illness.
Acknowledgments
The case studies that make up this book are based on our clinical practice and the
contributions of our students and other professionals. As the application of assessment
competencies is a core element of this book, we are truly grateful to the following students
who offered case contributions: Susan Bienvenu, Treva Bower, Lindsay Doles, Martha Dunn,
Gidget Fields, Lisa Genser, Carolynn Ghiloni, Christine Gigena, Dana Gilmore, Kristine
Kluck, Elizabeth Lincoln, Pamela McDonald, Jodee Mellerio, Cynthia Ormes, Kristi Payne,
Constance Ritter, Zoe Rizzuto, Heather Roberts, Anne Ross, Amelia Schor, Tina Shafer,
Rebecca Sorensen, Megan Vogel, Raquelle Ward, and Dallas Williams. We are also indebted
to the following social work professionals: Kim Giancaspro, Kris McAleavey, and Adina
Shapiro. Most of all, we want to thank Shane Fagan for tirelessly reading over case studies
and offering her valued clinical opinions.
We thank the reviewers for their suggestions: Chrystal Baranti, California State
University; Laura Boisen, Augsberg College; Daphne S. Cain, Louisiana State University;
Rebecca T. Davis, Rutgers University; and Judith H. Rosenberg, Central Connecticut State
University.
As always, thanks to Patrick Corcoran for his diligent and conscientious proofreading,
helping us to prepare the best book we can put forward.
This text is available in a variety of formats—digital and print. To learn more about our
programs, pricing options, and customization, visit www.pearsonhighered.com.
This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 1
Henry Williams, a 59-year-old African American, was in the hospital after undergoing surgery for
removal of a brain tumor. His past medical history included seizures, insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus, and pancreatitis (an inflammation of the pancreas that causes intense pain in the upper
abdomen). Currently, Mr. Williams was taking several medications, including Dilantin (used to
treat epilepsy), insulin, and steroids (to decrease swelling around his tumor).
About six days after the surgery, Mr. Williams woke up in the middle of the night and
was very loud in “casting the demons out,” as he called it. The nurse tried to calm him, but
Mr. Williams was so incensed that he picked up a small monitoring machine next to his bed and
threw it at her. Security officers and the on-duty physician assistant were called to calm the patient.
The next morning, the neurosurgery team requested a psychiatric exam, but because it
was a Friday Mr. Williams was not examined until the following Monday. His family visited over
the weekend, and he repeatedly became agitated, even accusing his wife of cheating on him.
He was upset and emotional during those visits, and it took him a while to calm down after his
family left.
On Sunday night, Mr. Williams got up at midnight and threatened his roommate.
Mr. Williams yelled that his roommate was cheating on him with his wife and they were plotting
to kill him. Because his roommate feared for his safety, he was moved to another room, while
the nurse tried to calm Mr. Williams.
When the psychiatric team, accompanied by the social work intern, finally examined
Mr. Williams, he said he felt great but was hearing voices, most prominently that of his pastor.
He reported that he saw demons at night and was attempting to fight them off. He also stated
that he thought someone wanted to kill him to benefit from his life insurance policy. In addition,
Mr. Williams told the psychiatrist that his wife had not come to visit him for some days (this was
not true; she had been there twice over the weekend) but that his son had been at his bedside
in the morning and that he had enjoyed the visit.
Mr. Williams’s wife heard about the incident with the roommate and said she would not
take Mr. Williams home because she was afraid of him. She told the social work intern that
Mr. Williams had behaved similarly in the past. She would sometimes wake up in the middle of
the night and find him standing next to the bed or leaning over her body, staring at her. When
she confronted her husband, he would pass it off as a joke, saying he was making sure she was
really in bed and had not gone out. (They had separate bedrooms.) She also told the intern that
although she had never cheated on her husband, he had had an affair several years ago. After
she found out, they went to marriage counseling together, but the marriage had been “rocky”
ever since.
1
2 Part One: Assessment
T
he case described is one in which the client, Mr. Williams, appears to have a men-
tal disorder. Almost half of all Americans (46.4%) meet the criteria for a mental,
emotional, or behavioral disorder sometime during their lives (Kessler, Berglund
et al., 2005). The various disorders are catalogued and described in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), published by the American Psychiatric
Association (APA). The DSM is the standard resource for clinical diagnosis in the United
States. The first edition of the DSM was published in 1952, and the manual has undergone
many revisions during the last 60 years. The latest version is DSM-5, published in May 2013.
The definition of mental disorder in DSM-5 (APA, 2013) is a “syndrome character-
ized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual’s cognition, emotion regulation,
or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmen-
tal processes underlying mental functioning” (p. 20). Such a disorder usually represents
significant distress in social or occupational functioning. The DSM represents a medical
perspective, only one of many possible perspectives on human behavior. The medical defi-
nition focuses on underlying disturbances within the person and is sometimes referred to
as the disease model of abnormality. This model implies that the abnormal person must
experience changes within the self (rather than create environmental change) in order to be
considered “normal” again.
In its desire to promote the “objectivity” of its manual, the APA does not recognize the
notion of mental illness as a social construction. A social construction is any belief system
in a culture that is accepted as factual or objective by many of its members, when in fact
the belief system is constructed by influential members of that society (Farone, 2003). The
medical profession holds great influence in Western society, so when mental health diagno-
ses are presented as scientifically based disorders, many people accept them as such. Social
constructionism asserts that many “accepted” facts in a society are in fact ideas that reflect
the values of the times in which they emerge.
The foregoing information may explain why the DSM classification system does
not fully represent the knowledge base or values of the social work profession, which
emphasizes a transactional, person-in-situation perspective on human functioning. Still,
the DSM is extensively used by social workers, for many positive reasons. Worldwide,
the medical profession is preeminent in setting standards for mental health practice, and
social workers are extensively employed in mental health settings, where clinical diagno-
sis is considered necessary for selecting appropriate interventions. In fact, social workers
account for more than half of the mental health workforce in the United States (Whitaker,
2009). Competent use of the DSM is beneficial to social workers (and clients) for the
following reasons:
• Social workers are employed in a variety of settings, not just mental health agencies
and facilities, where they meet people who are vulnerable to mental health d isorders
because of poverty, minority status, and other social factors. No matter what
their setting, social workers should be able to recognize the symptoms of possible
disorders in their clients and appropriately refer them for treatment services.
• The diagnostic system provides the partial basis of a comprehensive bio-psycho-
social assessment.
• An accurate diagnosis facilitates the development of a suitable intervention plan
(although many interventions are available for persons with the same diagnosis).
• The diagnostic categories enable social workers to help clients, and possibly also
their families, learn about the nature of the client’s problems. Although stigma is
often attached to the assignment of a diagnostic label, many people take a certain
comfort in learning that their painful experiences can be encapsulated in a diagno-
sis that is shared by others. It validates their experience and offers hope that their
problems can be treated.
Diagnosis and the Social Work Profession 3
Following is a description of the DSM classification system of mental disorders, along with
some general guidelines for its use (APA, 2013).
Beginning with the problem that is most responsible for the current evaluation, the
mental disorder is recorded. Most major diagnoses also contain subtypes or specifiers
(e.g., “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe”) for added diagnostic clarity. When uncertain if a
diagnosis is correct, the social worker should use the “provisional” qualifier, which means
he or she may need additional time or information to be confident about the choice. It is
important to recognize that more than one diagnosis can be used for a client, and medical
diagnoses should also be included if they are significant to the client’s overall condition.
Social workers cannot make medical diagnoses, of course, but they can be included if they
are noted in a client’s history or the client reports their existence. Further, if a person no
longer meets criteria for a disorder that may be relevant to his or her current condition, the
qualifier “past history” can be used, although this would not be the primary diagnosis. For
example, if a woman seeks help for depression while she is pregnant, it may be important
to note if she had an eating disorder history. Social and environmental problems that are
a focus of clinical attention may also be included as part of the diagnosis. A chapter in the
DSM titled “Other Conditions That May Be a Focus of Clinical Attention” includes a list of
conditions (popularly known as V-codes) that are not considered formal diagnoses but can
be used for that descriptive purpose.
Following is a list of “hierarchical principles” that can help the practitioner decide
which diagnoses to use in situations where several might be considered:
• “Disorders due to a general medical condition” and “substance-induced disorders,”
which include not only substances people consume but also medications they are
prescribed, preempt a diagnosis of any other disorder that could produce the same
symptoms.
4 Part One: Assessment
• The fewer diagnoses that account for the symptoms, the better. This is the rule of
“parsimony.” Practitioners need to understand the “power of the diagnostic label,”
in its negative as well as positive aspects, and use diagnostic labels judiciously. For
example, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and reactive attachment disorder
are sometimes diagnosed simultaneously in children. Although they share some
presentation, when they are used together, the diagnostic picture becomes impre-
cise and does not lead to a coherent treatment plan.
• When a more pervasive disorder has essential or associated symptoms that are
the defining symptoms of a less pervasive disorder, the more pervasive d isorder
is diagnosed if its criteria are met. For example, if symptoms of both “autism
spectrum disorder” and “specific communication disorder” are present, the social
worker should use the former diagnosis, because its range of criteria overlaps with
the latter one (see chapter 3 for case examples).
The principles outlined earlier are, of course, applied only after a comprehensive client
a ssessment is carried out. Each chapter in this book includes assessment principles relevant
to specific disorders, but here we present some general guidelines for the assessment of a
client’s mental, emotional, and behavioral functioning.
A Mental Status Examination (MSE) is a process by which a social worker or other human
services professional systematically examines the quality of a client’s mental functioning.
Ten areas of functioning are considered individually. The results of the examination are
combined with information derived from a client’s social history to produce clinical
impressions of the client, including a DSM diagnosis. An MSE can typically be completed
in 15 minutes or less. One commonly used format for an MSE evaluates the following areas
of client functioning (Daniel & Gurczynski, 2003):
• Appearance. The person’s overall appearance in the context of his or her cultural
group. These features are significant because poor personal hygiene or grooming may
reflect a physical inability to care for one’s physical self or a loss of interest in doing so.
• Movement and behavior. The person’s manner of walking, posture, coordination,
eye contact, and facial expressions. Problems with walking or coordination may
reflect a disorder of the central nervous system.
• Affect. This refers to a person’s outwardly observable emotional reactions and may
include either a lack of emotional response or an overreaction to an event.
• Mood. The underlying emotional tone of the person’s answers.
• Speech. The volume of the person’s voice, the rate or speed of speech, the length of
answers to questions, and the appropriateness and clarity of the answers.
• Thought content. Any indications in the client’s words or behaviors of hallucina-
tions, delusions, obsessions, symptoms of dissociation, or thoughts of suicide.
• Thought process. The logical connections between thoughts and their relevance to
the conversation. Irrelevant detail, repeated words and phrases, interrupted thinking,
and illogical connections between thoughts may be signs of a thought disorder.
• Cognition. The act or condition of knowing. The social worker assesses the per-
son’s orientation with regard to time, place, and personal identity; long- and short-
term memory; ability to perform simple arithmetic (counting backward by threes
or sevens); general intellectual level or fund of knowledge (identifying the last five
presidents, or similar questions); ability to think abstractly (explaining a proverb);
ability to name specified objects and read or write complete sentences; ability to
understand and perform a task (showing the examiner how to comb one’s hair or
Diagnosis and the Social Work Profession 5
throw a ball); ability to draw a simple map or copy a design or geometrical figure;
ability to distinguish between right and left.
• Judgment. The social worker asks the person what he or she would do about a
commonsense problem, such as running out of a prescription medication.
• Insight. A person’s ability to recognize a problem and understand its nature and
severity.
Abnormal results for an MSE include any evidence of brain damage or thought dis-
orders, a mood or affect that is clearly inappropriate to its context, thoughts of suicide,
disturbed speech patterns, dissociative symptoms, and delusions or hallucinations.
Directions: Now that you have read a description of the diagnostic system,
h ierarchical principles, and an MSE, can you work out a diagnosis for Henry
Williams before reading ahead?
Diagnosis
a basis in reality, even though he was the one who had had an affair. Projection of his
own behavior onto his wife may have caused the delusion.) It should also be noted that
Mr. Williams had just had a brain tumor removed; changes in mood and affect are fairly
common in these patients. Finally, the “without use disorder” specifier indicates that
Mr. Williams does not have an existing substance use disorder apart from what he is now
experiencing. (We also note here that some, but not all, specifiers have numerical codes, as
is true in this case.)
While four other diagnoses refer to Mr. Williams’s medical condition, the final nota-
tion (“relational distress with spouse”) is included to indicate that his marital situation will
be a focus of the overall intervention.
reference to personal and the social aspects of life in the diagnosis through the use of
V-codes.
Fifth, some feminists argue that the DSM is gender-biased, according a much higher
prevalence of many disorders to women than men (notably depression, anxiety, and many
of the personality disorders) (Wiley, 2004). The DSM has been criticized for blaming
women for their responses to oppressive social conditions (Blehar, 2006).
Sixth, because not all symptoms need to be met for any diagnosis to be made, two
people with the same diagnosis can have very different symptom profiles. There is also an
acknowledged abundance of “sub-threshold cases” (those that do not quite meet the mini-
mum number of symptom criteria), even though these may produce as much impairment
as those that meet full diagnostic criteria (Gonzalez-Tejara et al., 2005). This problem of a
lack of specificity has been dealt with in part by the addition over time of new subtypes of
disorders, and also by the introduction of severity qualifiers (mild, medium, severe).
Due to this limitation, many people have argued that mental disorders (e.g., anxiety,
depression, and personality disorders) should be assessed through a dimensional approach,
on a continuum of health and disorder. Many measurement instruments assess symptoms
in a dimensional context rather than through a categorical system like the DSM, in which a
person either meets certain criteria or does not. Several systems of this type are included in
Part III of the DSM (e.g., with personality disorders) but they have not yet been adopted for
“official” use. In this book we may occasionally mention measures that might be useful for
assessment, but the focus is on DSM diagnosis. The interested reader is encouraged to refer
to other books that focus on measurement instruments (Corcoran & Walsh, 2010; Fischer
& Corcoran, 2007; Hersen, 2006).
Seventh, the problem of comorbidity, in which a person may qualify for more than one
diagnosis, is a point of confusion among practitioners. The reader will note that, through-
out this book, comorbidity rates for disorders are often substantial. The DSM encour-
ages the recording of more than one diagnosis when the assessment justifies doing so. But
many disorders (e.g., anxiety disorders and depression) correlate strongly with one another
(Kessler, Chiu, Demler, & Walters, 2005). It may be that an anxious depression differs from
either a “pure” major depressive disorder or anxiety disorder in critical ways. In addition,
research on treatment generally confines itself to people without comorbid disorders, so
that results are often not generalizable to the treatment population at large.
Finally, the DSM makes no provisions for recording client strengths. Strengths-
oriented practice implies that practitioners should assess all clients in light of their
capacities, talents, competencies, possibilities, visions, values, and hopes (Guo & Tsui, 2010;
Saleeby, 2008). This perspective emphasizes human resilience—the skills, abilities, knowl-
edge, and insight that people accumulate over time as they struggle to surmount adversity
and meet life challenges. In chapters 2 and 3, we will discuss the appraisal of strengths—at
both individual and environmental levels.
References
Chapter 2
This book is organized with a biopsychosocial risk and resilience framework for understanding
and intervening with persons who have mental disorders. In this chapter, we first describe this
framework and its advantages for social work assessment. Next, we detail a number of risk
and protective factors at the biological, psychological, and social levels that may contribute
to or inhibit the development of mental disorders. In the last section of the chapter, we cover
techniques that social workers can use to elicit and build upon strengths of individuals and their
social environment, going beyond naturally occurring protective factors.
Although the biological and psychological levels relate to the individual, the social aspect
of the framework captures the effects of the family, the community, and the wider social
culture. The processes within each level interact, prompting the occurrence of risks for
emotional or mental disorders (Shirk, Talmi, & Olds, 2000) and the propensity toward
resilience, or the ability to function adaptively despite stressful life circumstances. Risks can
be understood as hazards occurring at the individual or environmental level that increase
the likelihood of impairment developing (Bogenschneider, 1996). Protective mechanisms
involve the personal, familial, community, and institutional resources that cultivate indi-
viduals’ aptitudes and abilities while diminishing the possibility of problem behaviors
(Dekovic, 1999). These protective influences may counterbalance or buffer against risk
(Pollard, Hawkins, & Arthur, 1999; Werner, 2000) and are sometimes the converse of risk
(Jessor, Van Den Bos, Vanderryn, Costa, & Turbin, 1997). For instance, at the individual
level, poor physical health presents risks while good health is protective. It must be noted
that research on protective influences is limited compared with information on risks for
various disorders (Donovan & Spence, 2000).
The biopsychosocial emphasis expands one’s focus beyond the individual to a
recognition of systemic factors that can both create and ameliorate problems. The
nature of systems is such that the factors within and between them have transactional
and reciprocal influence on one another, with early risk mechanisms setting the stage for
greater vulnerability to subsequent risks. The development of oppositional defiant disor-
der and conduct disorder (see chapter 10) is a case in point that shows how the presence
of certain risk or protective mechanisms may increase the likelihood of other risk and
protective influences.
8
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
determined effort to control for good purposes the existing
Republican organization. He chose the latter alternative, and began
a serious campaign to secure his object. There was at the time a
fight in the Republican organization between two factions, both of
which were headed by professional politicians. Both factions at the
outset looked upon Goddard’s methods with amused contempt,
expecting that he would go the gait which they had seen so many
other young men go, where they lacked either persistency or hard
common-sense. But Goddard was a practical man. He spent his
days and evenings in perfecting his own organization, using the Civic
Club as a centre. He already had immense influence in the district,
thanks to what he had done in the Civic Club, and at this, his first
effort, he was able to make an organization which, while it could not
have availed against the extraordinary drill and discipline of
Tammany, was able overwhelmingly to beat the far feebler machine
of the regular Republican politicians. At the primary he got more
votes than both his antagonists put together. No man outside of
politics can realize the paralyzed astonishment with which the result
was viewed by the politicians in every other Assembly district. Here
at last was a reformer whose aspirations took exceedingly efficient
shape as deeds; who knew what could and what could not be done;
who was never content with less than the possible best, but who
never threw away that possible best because it was not the ideal
best; who did not try to reform the universe, but merely his own
district; and who understood thoroughly that though speeches and
essays are good, downright hard work of the common-sense type is
infinitely better.
It is more difficult to preserve the fruits of a victory than to win the
victory. Mr. Goddard did both. A year later, when the old-school
professional politicians attempted to oust him from his party
leadership in the district association, he beat them more
overwhelmingly than before; and when the Republican National
Convention came around he went still further afield, beat out his
opponents in the Congressional district, and sent two delegates to
Philadelphia. Nor was his success confined to the primary. In both
the years of his leadership he has enormously increased the
Republican vote in his district, doing better relatively than any other
district leader in the city. He does this by adopting the social
methods of Tammany, only using them along clean lines. The
Tammany leader keeps his hold by incessant watchfulness over
every element, and almost every voter, in his district. Neither his
objects nor his methods are good; but he does take a great deal of
pains, and he is obliged to do much charitable work; although it is
not benevolence of a healthy kind. Mr. Goddard was already, through
the Civic Club, doing just this kind of work, on a thoroughly healthy
basis. Going into politics had immensely helped with the club, for it
had given a great common interest to all of the men. Of course
Goddard could have done nothing if he had not approached his work
in a genuine American spirit of entire respect for himself and for
those with whom and for whom he labored. Any condescension, any
patronizing spirit would have spoiled everything. But the spirit which
exacts respect and yields it, which is anxious always to help in a
mood of simple brotherhood, and which is glad to accept help in
return—this is the spirit which enables men of every degree of
wealth and of widely varying social conditions to work together in
heartiest good-will, and to the immense benefit of all. It is thus that
Mr. Goddard has worked. His house is in the district and he is in
close touch with every one. If a man is sick with pneumonia, some
member of the Civic Club promptly comes around to consult
Goddard as to what hospital he shall be taken to. If another man is
down on his luck, it is Goddard who helps him along through the
hard times. If a boy has been wild and got into trouble and gone to
the penitentiary, it is Goddard who is appealed to to see whether
anything can be done for him. The demands upon his time and
patience are innumerable. The reward, it is to be supposed, must
come from the consciousness of doing well work which is
emphatically well worth doing. A very shrewd politician said the other
day that if there were twenty such men as Goddard in twenty such
districts as his New York City would be saved from Tammany, and
that in the process the Republican machine would be made heartily
responsive to and representative of the best sentiment of the
Republicans of the several districts.
The University Settlements do an enormous amount of work. As
has been well said, they demand on the part of those who work in
them infinitely more than the sacrifice of almsgiving, for they demand
a helping hand in that progress which for the comfort of all must be
given to all; they help people to help themselves, not only in work
and self-support, but in right thinking and right living. It would be hard
to mention any form of civic effort for righteousness which has not
received efficient aid from Mr. James B. Reynolds and his fellow-
workers in the University Settlements. They have stood for the forces
of good in politics, in social life, in warring against crime, in
increasing the sum of material pleasures. They work hand in hand,
shoulder to shoulder, with those whom they seek to benefit, and they
themselves share in the benefit. They make their house the centre
for all robust agencies for social betterment. They have consistently
endeavored to work with, rather than merely for, the community; to
co-operate in honorable friendship with all who are struggling
upward. Only those who know the appalling conditions of life in the
swarming tenements that surround the University Settlement can
appreciate what it has done. It has almost inevitably gone into
politics now and then, and whenever it has done so has exercised a
thoroughly healthy influence. It has offered to the people of the
neighborhood educational and social opportunities ranging from a
dancing academy and musical classes, to literary clubs, a library,
and a children’s bank—the clubs being administered on the principle
of self-management and self-government. It has diligently
undertaken to co-operate with all local organizations such as trades-
unions, benefit societies, social clubs, and the like, provided only that
their purposes were decent. The Settlement has always desired to
co-operate with independent forces rather than merely to lead or
direct the dependent forces of society. Its work in co-operation with
trades-unions has been of special value both in helping them where
they have done good work, and in endeavoring to check any
tendency to evil in any particular union. It has, for instance,
consistently labored to secure the settlement of strikes by
consultation or arbitration, before the bitterness has become so great
as to prevent any chance of a settlement. All this is aside from its
work of sociological investigation and its active co-operation with
those public officials who, like the late Colonel Waring, desired such
aid.
Healthy political endeavor should, of course, be one form of social
work. This truth is not recognized as it should be. Perhaps, also,
there is some, though a far lesser, failure to recognize that a living
church organization should, more than any other, be a potent force in
social uplifting. Churches are needed for all sorts and conditions of
men under every kind of circumstances; but surely the largest field of
usefulness is open to that church in which the spirit of brotherhood is
a living and vital force, and not a cold formula; in which the rich and
poor gather together to aid one another in work for a common end.
Brother can best help brother, not by almsgiving, but by joining with
him in an intelligent and resolute effort for the uplifting of all. It is
towards this that St. George’s Church, under Dr. W. S. Rainsford,
has steadily worked. The membership of St. George’s Church is in a
great majority composed of working people—and young working
people at that. It is a free church with a membership of over four
thousand, most of the members having come in by way of the
Sunday-school. Large sums of money are raised, not from a few
people, but from the many. An honest effort has been made to study
the conditions of life in the neighborhood, and through the church to
remedy those which were abnormal. One of the troubles on the East
Side is the lack of opportunity for young people, boys and girls, to
meet save where the surroundings are unfavorable to virtue. In St.
George’s Church this need is, so far as can be, met by meetings—
debating societies, clubs, social entertainments, etc., in the large
parish building. Years ago the dances needed to be policed by
chosen ladies and gentlemen and clergymen. Now the whole
standard of conduct has been so raised that the young people
conduct their own entertainments as they see fit. There is a large
athletic club and industrial school, a boys’ battalion and men’s club;
there are sewing classes, cooking classes, and a gymnasium for
working girls. Dr. Rainsford’s staff includes both men and women,
the former living at the top of the parish house, the latter in the little
deaconess-house opposite. Every effort is made to keep in close
touch with wage-workers, and this not merely for their benefit, but
quite as much for the benefit of those who are brought in touch with
them.
The church is, of all places, that in which men should meet on the
basis of their common humanity under conditions of sympathy and
mutual self-respect. All must work alike in the church in order to get
the full benefit from it; but it is not the less true that we have a
peculiar right to expect systematic effort from men and women of
education and leisure. Such people should justify by their work the
conditions of society which have rendered possible their leisure, their
education, and their wealth. Money can never take the place of
service, and though here and there it is absolutely necessary to have
the paid worker, yet normally he is not an adequate substitute for the
volunteer.
Of course St. George’s Church has not solved all the social
problems in the immediate neighborhood which is the field of its
special effort. But it has earnestly tried to solve some at least, and it
has achieved a very substantial measure of success towards their
solution. Perhaps, after all, the best work done has been in
connection with the development of the social side of the church
organization. Reasonable opportunities for social intercourse are an
immense moral safeguard, and young people of good character and
steady habits should be encouraged to meet under conditions which
are pleasant and which also tell for decency. The work of a down-
town church in New York City presents difficulties that are unique,
but it also presents opportunities that are unique. In the case of St.
George’s Church it is only fair to say that the difficulties have been
overcome, and the opportunities taken advantage of, to the utmost.
Aside from the various kinds of work outlined above, where the
main element is the coming together of people for the purpose of
helping one another to rise higher, there is, of course, a very large
field for charitable work proper. For such work there must be
thorough organization of the kind supplied, for instance, by the State
Charities Aid Association. Here, again, the average outsider would
be simply astounded to learn of the amount actually accomplished
every year by the association.
A peculiar and exceedingly desirable form of work, originally
purely charitable, although not now as exclusively so, is that of the
Legal Aid Society, founded by Arthur von Briesen. It was founded to
try to remedy the colossal injustice which was so often encountered
by the poorest and most ignorant immigrants; it has been extended
to shield every class, native and foreign. There are always among
the poor and needy thousands of helpless individuals who are
preyed upon by sharpers of different degrees. If very poor, they may
have no means whatever of obtaining redress; and, especially if they
are foreigners ignorant of the language, they may also be absolutely
ignorant as to what steps should be taken in order to right the wrong
that has been done them. The injuries that are done may seem
trivial; but they are not trivial to the sufferers, and the aggregate
amount of misery caused is enormous. The Legal Aid Society has
made it its business to take up these cases and secure justice. Every
conceivable variety of case is attended to. The woman who has
been deserted or maltreated by her husband, the poor serving-maid
who has been swindled out of her wages, the ignorant immigrant
who has fallen a victim to some sharper, the man of no knowledge of
our language or laws who has been arrested for doing something
which he supposed was entirely proper—all these and countless
others like them apply for relief, and have it granted in tens of
thousands of cases every year. It should be remembered that the
good done is not merely to the sufferers themselves, it is also a good
done to society, for it leaves in the mind of the newcomer to our
shores, not the rankling memory of wrong and injustice, but the
feeling that, after all, here in the New World, where he has come to
seek his fortune, there are disinterested men who endeavor to see
that the right prevails.
Some men can do their best work in an organization. Some,
though they occasionally work in an organization, can do best by
themselves. Recently a man well qualified to pass judgment alluded
to Mr. Jacob A. Riis as “the most useful citizen of New York.” Those
fellow-citizens of Mr. Riis who best know his work will be most apt to
agree with this statement. The countless evils which lurk in the dark
corners of our civic institutions, which stalk abroad in the slums, and
have their permanent abode in the crowded tenement houses, have
met in Mr. Riis the most formidable opponent ever encountered by
them in New York City. Many earnest men and earnest women have
been stirred to the depths by the want and misery and foul crime
which are bred in the crowded blocks of tenement rookeries. These
men and women have planned and worked, intelligently and
resolutely, to overcome the evils. But to Mr. Riis was given, in
addition to earnestness and zeal, the great gift of expression, the
great gift of making others see what he saw and feel what he felt. His
book, How the Other Half Lives, did really go a long way toward
removing the ignorance in which one half of the world of New York
dwelt concerning the life of the other half. Moreover, Mr. Riis
possessed the further great advantage of having himself passed
through not a few of the experiences of which he had to tell. Landing
here, a young Danish lad, he had for years gone through the hard
struggle that so often attends even the bravest and best when they
go out without money to seek their fortunes in a strange and alien
land. The horror of the police lodging-houses struck deep in his soul,
for he himself had lodged in them. The brutality of some of the police
he had himself experienced. He had been mishandled, and had seen
the stray dog which was his only friend killed for trying in dumb
friendship to take his part. He had known what it was to sleep on
door-steps and go days in succession without food. All these things
he remembered, and his work as a reporter on the New York Sun
has enabled him in the exercise of his profession to add to his
knowledge. There are certain qualities the reformer must have if he
is to be a real reformer and not merely a faddist; for of course every
reformer is in continual danger of slipping into the mass of well-
meaning people who in their advocacy of the impracticable do more
harm than good. He must possess high courage, disinterested desire
to do good, and sane, wholesome common-sense. These qualities
he must have, and it is furthermore much to his benefit if he also
possesses a sound sense of humor. All four traits are possessed by
Jacob Riis. No rebuff, no seeming failure, has ever caused him to
lose faith. The memory of his own trials never soured him. His keen
sense of the sufferings of others never clouded his judgment, never
led him into hysterical or sentimental excess, the pit into which not a
few men are drawn by the very keenness of their sympathies; and
which some other men avoid, not because they are wise, but
because they are cold-hearted. He ever advocates mercy, but he
ever recognizes the need of justice. The mob leader, the bomb-
thrower, have no sympathy from him. No man has ever insisted more
on the danger which comes to the community from the lawbreaker.
He sets himself to kill the living evil, and small is his kinship with the
dreamers who seek the impossible, the men who talk of
reconstituting the entire social order, but who do not work to lighten
the burden of mankind by so much as a feather’s weight. Every man
who strives, be it ever so feebly, to do good according to the light
that is in him, can count on the aid of Jacob Riis if the chance
comes. Whether the man is a public official, like Colonel Waring,
seeking to raise some one branch of the city government; whether
he is interested in a boys’ club up in the country; or in a scheme for
creating small parks in the city; or in an effort to better the conditions
of tenement-house life—no matter what his work is, so long as his
work is useful, he can count on the aid of the man who perhaps
more than any other knows the needs of the varied people who
make up the great bulk of New York’s population.
Half a dozen men have been mentioned, each only as a type of
those who in the seething life of the great city do, in their several
ways and according to their strength and varying capacities, strive to
do their duty to their neighbor. No hard-and-fast rule can be laid
down as to the way in which such work must be done; but most
certainly every man, whatever his position, should strive to do it in
some way and to some degree. If he strives earnestly he will benefit
himself probably quite as much as he benefits others, and he will
inevitably learn a great deal. At first it may be an effort to him to cast
off certain rigid conventions, but real work of any kind is a great
educator, and soon helps any man to single out the important from
the unimportant. If such a worker has the right stuff in him he soon
grows to accept without effort each man on his worth as a man, and
to disregard his means, and what is called his social position; to care
little whether he is a Catholic or Protestant, a Jew or a Gentile; to be
utterly indifferent whether he was born here or in Ireland, in Germany
or in Scandinavia; provided only that he has in him the spirit of sturdy
common-sense and the resolute purpose to strive after the light as it
is given him to see the light.
FOOTNOTES:
[24] Reprinted, by permission, from McClure’s Magazine.
Copyright, 1901, S. S. McClure Co.
THE WORKS OF THEODORE
ROOSEVELT
Standard Library Edition.
8 volumes, 8º, illustrated each, $ 2.50
Cloth per set, 20.00
Half calf extra, ” 40.00