Peer Evaluation Rubric

Criteria 0 (Insufficient) 1 (Limited) 2 (Basic) 3 (Competent) 4 (Proficient) 5 (Exceptional)

Took exceptional
Consistently initiative in
Demonstrated Consistently demonstrated identifying
limited Showed moderate demonstrated exceptional opportunities,
Lacked initiative, entrepreneurial entrepreneurial entrepreneurial entrepreneurial generating
hindering the initiative, with initiative with some initiative and initiative, innovative ideas,
development of infrequent valuable contributed significantly and actively
Entrepreneurial the startup contributions to contributions to the positively to the enhancing the contributing to the
Initiative concept. the startup idea. startup concept. startup idea. startup concept. startup concept.
Demonstrated Consistently Displayed Excellently executed
Showed a lack of some creativity and contributed creative exceptional tasks outlined in the
creativity, Displayed limited innovation, with and innovative creativity, bringing startup plan,
negatively creativity, and occasional ideas that original and contributing
Creativity and impacting the contributions were contributions to the enhanced the inventive ideas to significantly to the
Innovation startup concept. rarely innovative. startup project. startup concept. the startup project. project's progress.
Executed tasks
Frequently fell Consistently met or Excellently executed outlined in the
Execution of short of Generally met exceeded tasks outlined in the startup plan
tasks was expectations in expectations in expectations in startup plan, exceptionally well,
consistently executing tasks, executing tasks, executing tasks contributing contributing
Execution of below impacting the with occasional outlined in the significantly to the significantly to the
Startup Plan expectations. startup's progress. shortcomings. startup plan. project's progress. project's success.
Risk-Taking and Avoided risks Displayed a Showed some Took appropriate Demonstrated a Demonstrated
Adaptability altogether, reluctance to take willingness to take risks and adapted strong willingness strong leadership
hindering the risks, impacting the risks but struggled well to changes, to take calculated skills, motivating
startup's growth. startup's potential with significant contributing risks, adapting and guiding the
for success. changes or positively to the effectively to team effectively.
unexpected startup's changing
 Criteria 0 (Insufficient) 1 (Limited) 2 (Basic) 3 (Competent) 4 (Proficient) 5 (Exceptional)
challenges. development. circumstances.
Failed to Generally Collaborated Proactively Proactively
collaborate collaborated but effectively with collaborated with supported team
effectively, Often worked had occasional team members, team members, goals, actively
negatively independently, conflicts or contributing fostering a positive collaborated, and
Collaboration impacting team hindering overall challenges working positively to the and supportive fostered a positive
and Teamwork morale. team synergy. with others. team dynamic. team environment. team environment.
Failed to provide Demonstrated
effective Showed limited some leadership Showed effective
leadership, leadership skills, qualities but leadership skills,
Leadership (if hindering team impacting team struggled in certain guiding the team
applicable) progress. direction. aspects. towards success.

PEER EVALUATION
Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________ Group Name: __________________________________

Instructions for Students:

 Assign a score for each criterion based on your assessment of your peer's performance.
 Provide specific examples or comments to support your ratings.
 Be fair and objective in your evaluation, considering both strengths and areas for improvement.
 Keep feedback constructive and focused on behaviors and actions rather than personal attributes.

NAME OF MEMBER
CRITERIA TOTAL
Entrepreneurial
Initiative
Creativity and
Innovation
Execution of
Startup Plan
Risk-Taking and
Adaptability
Collaboration
and Teamwork
Leadership (if
applicable)