Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 3
AK Gopalan Vs state of Madvas. CASE SUMMARY AK Gopalan vs. State Of Madras. Case Name: Citation AIR 19805027, 19S0 SCR 38. Dedded m: 19-05 -1950 EACTS AK Gopalan was a politico Whe was oletained in prison sinalSUd undey preventive Detentin Pict lgso . Petitioner challenged his deten tim th vovg h. writ of Habeas Corpus undev fy bite, 32 of Andian Constitution . Pettioney dmbended that section 1, % 510,11, 12, (S14 of the act vielates 13,19 amd 24 of Censtitubion, @ leqet Studies article Narn bian ang ved that vi ght 4 movement is the Cssenae a Wberty Oma detention was not under Yeamable veatiction dome Under Pride ld. + Gants rejected the pler on tHe ground thab artile iS a Svbstambive right of Uberty While aide 21 Is Proceso Safe quarcA opint its deprivative, Led gement o Court applied Doctrine ate lount alecloned See. 1611) Wjl4y1 ad Ywtra- Virus the Conotitutin hence Valco| , loust ford the detention was lege and how wit Was dis posed a @ lege studieg vara sTivcs ce Issves whe they Section 7/10, 12,18 one ultra = vViws the Avt. 13,18, emd2i, whether the article 18 and 21 one inter - velated +0 Gach. Other im Protectio oy fe. and Ubevty whether the detention gf the petitimer Undey Preventive Detention Act, Iso is egal Whether artde 22 is the Complete Code bo Itselp dealing with the Preventive detention Care, Argu ments Advomced Mik Nombiy Was the aslv. fron petition er while the State was represented by Ks Rayoh Rigor and Mc Setlvad . Petitiner ay used for the Unncotat burtl omnali q the. abwe statement .

You might also like