Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Analyse On The Possible Losses of The 4th Guards Tank Division
An Analyse On The Possible Losses of The 4th Guards Tank Division
By Drecas
The 4th Guards is the descendent of the 17th Tank Corps of the Red Army, formed in
Stalingrad in 1942. The unit was deployed in Voronezh and saw battle there, then in
1943 it was renamed to the 4th Guards Tank Corps, it continued its service throughout
World War 2 with distinction and by the end of the war it had be awarded two
decorations, the Order of Lenin, and the Order of the Red Banner.
Garrisoned in Moscow since 1945 the division was reactivated in 2013 and serves under
the 1st Guards Tank Army, currently its deployed in Ukraine where it has seen action in
the Sumy and Kharkiv regions.
The unit also maintains to this day the Oak Leaves in their coat of arms and is considered
one of Russia’s elite units.
Structure:
1 Battalion of tanks, this one with 41 tanks, the reason for this is because it has
4 tank companies instead of the usual 3, it should have 1 T-80BVK, 20 T-80BV’s
and 20 T-80BVM
In total this regiment should have 41 tanks and 94 BMP-2, again though this is taking its
paper strength at face value.
In total the division has in its arsenal at least 229 tanks and 155 BMP-2 at paper strength.
If we assume an 85% readiness state, then the division had 194 tanks and 131 BMP’s
ready to go.
If we assume a 70% readiness state, then the division has employed in Ukraine 160 tanks
and 108 BMP’s ready to go.
If we assume an even lower number of 50% readiness state, then the division has 114
tanks and 77 BMP’s ready to go.
Tank Losses:
Now let us try to identify how many tanks this division has lost and evaluate the
percentage of losses, for this we will be only using Oryx.
Fig.2: A T-80U with the “4” as a tactical marking Fig.3: A T-80U with the oak leaves as a tactical marking
“No tactical markings but likely to belong to the division”: meaning that despite the tank
not having a visual identifier to connect it to the division we can still include it in the
division’s losses.
The rules for this will be:
>Place of destruction, abandonment or capture of the tank
>Ukrainian unit that claimed the destruction or capture of the tank
>The time of the destruction, abandonment or capture of the tank
This is a flawed logic I do concede that, however it is in my opinion the best strategy
possible at the moment.
In Oryx’s list there are 175 unknown tanks, from these I think there can be a case to be
made of a possible T-80(T-80U possibly) from the division, reason being that this one
was abandoned in Sumy and in the time period that the division was there present, of
course this should be taken with a cargo ship load of salt.
1. https://postlmg.cc/2Lv3qD0K
Before the conclusion I would like to point out that there is a good chance that most and
maybe even all 86 T-80U’s on Oryx’s list could belong to the division.
Now in total I believe they have lost at the very least 104 or 105 tanks.
Now for the following exercise we will assume they have lost 105 tanks.
If we consider paper strength (229 tanks) then they have lost more than a tank regiment
and 45% of their tanks.
If we consider an 85% (194 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 54% of their
tanks.
If we consider a 70% (160 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 65% of their
tanks.
And if we consider a 50% (114 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 92% of their
tanks.
For an elite division these losses are simply too high
We must not forget that we are also potentially missing several tanks from Oryx’s list
and that in reality the true number of losses is likely to be higher than the ones visually
confirmed by Oryx
At the same time the number of losses in IFV´s of the division should not be low and
likewise its possible the unit’s infantry has suffered deeply from staunch and effective
ukrainian resistance.
Now let us assume all T-80U’s belong to the division and remake the calculations above.
In this case then they have lost in total 131 or 132 tanks
Now for the following exercise we will assume they have lost 132 tanks.
If we consider paper strength (229 tanks) then they have lost more than a tank regiment
and almost a tank battalion, meaning 57% of their tanks.
If we consider an 85% (194 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 68% of their
tanks.
If we consider a 70% (160 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 82% of their
tanks.
And if we consider a 50% (114 tanks) state of readiness then they have lost 114% of their
tanks.
For an elite division these losses are simply too high
Again I must stress that we are also potentially missing several tanks from Oryx’s list and
that in reality the true number of losses is likely to be higher than the ones visually
confirmed by Oryx
At the same time the number of losses in IFV´s of the division should not be low and
likewise its possible the unit’s infantry has suffered deeply from staunch and effective
ukrainian resistance.
Fig.5: Order of Battle of the 4th Guards Tank Division, made by Battle Order
Sources:
4th Guards Tank Division battle order by Battle Order:
https://www.battleorder.org/ru-orbat
AFV Recognition:
https://www.instagram.com/afv_recognition_/