Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biology Year 13 Mock Answers
Biology Year 13 Mock Answers
Biology Year 13 Mock Answers
Mark schemes
(a) Vegetation consists mainly of low growing species / herbs / annuals / no / few trees;
1.
Species X has high rate of photosynthesis at high light intensity;
Do not credit Species X is first tree
Species X grow fastest at high rate of photosynthesis / at high light intensities and will
outcompete other species Y / Z;
3
(Yes)
Two organisms can’t occupy same niche / competitive exclusion principle / ( P. aurelia and
P. caudatum) competing for same resources / P. caudatum driven to extinction;
(No)
Grown in lab, so don’t know normal role within habitat;
OR
OR
OR
(Yes)
Takes few days before P. caudatum starts to decrease so could be build-up of toxin;
OR
Increase in P. aurelia population causes decrease in P. caudatum population;
(No)
No evidence of toxin / correlation doesn’t mean cause;
Allow other sensible suggestions
4
[8]
(b) (i) Difficult / too many / too many to count / individual organisms not identifiable /
too small to identify / grows in clumps;
Neutral: easier / quicker / representative / more accurate, unless
qualified
1
(a) more proteins / amino acids / more DNA / nucleotides / nucleotide derivative;
5. increased cell division / number of cells formed;
2
Some prey animals move out or die / fewer suitable prey for tiger /
less food for tiger; Reduces tiger population if prey biomass
falls below 600 (tonnes per km2);
3
[4]
OR
OR
(c) 125%;
(a) Candidates should be encouraged to take time to understand data given in the form of
graphs or tables before attempting the questions. It appeared to the examiners that many
considered the figure to represent data that they had previously encountered, and
interpreted it as representing changes in population with time. Better candidates were,
however, able to recognise that Species X had a higher rate of photosynthesis at higher
light intensities and some were able to link this to competition and establishment at an early
stage in succession.
(b) Those candidates who had interpreted the graph successfully were usually able to point out
that species X would produce shade and under these conditions species Z, with its higher
rate of photosynthesis at lower light intensities, would be able to grow. There were many
answers, however, based on Species X growing, dying and adding nutrients to the soil.
Such an answer may have been partly correct but it made no use of the data provided, an
essential prerequisite to gaining credit.
(a) The vast majority of students correctly named the pioneer species as Ulva lactuca.
3.
(b) (i) Fewer than half the students obtained this mark. Those who did frequently referred to
the difficulty in counting or identifying individual organisms because of their small
size. Many students simply stated it would be ‘easier’ or ‘more accurate’ without
providing any explanation.
(ii) Most students did not obtain this mark, as they simply stated that the concrete blocks
were ‘not natural’ or were ‘man-made’. Correct responses usually referred to factors
such as nutrients, minerals or texture being different and affecting the growth of
algae.
(c) Most students obtained at least one mark, usually for the principle of a species making the
conditions less hostile. However only ten percent of students gained all four marks by using
the results provided to describe and explain the process of succession. These students
referred directly to the species involved and related the changes in percentage cover to
interspecific competition as the environment changed. Many students simply provided a
generic description of succession, often only referring to the pioneer species. This rote
learning was clearly demonstrated by the number of students who included mosses, shrubs
and trees in their responses.
Not surprisingly this question produced a lot of good answers but still discriminated well despite
4. forty percent of students scoring four or more marks out of the five available. Weaker responses
lacked the appropriate level of scientific terminology, omitted essential details or confused ideas.
Most students referred to an algal bloom and its effect on penetration of light. However, some
students omitted any reference to photosynthesis, or related a reduced oxygen concentration
solely to the activity of plants. Some students referred to fish dying due to lack of food with no
reference to oxygen or respiration. The best responses were often clear and concise and read as
the mark scheme. These answers referred to saprobiotic microorganisms rather than simply
‘decomposers’ and clearly related the death of fish to a decrease in oxygen for respiration.
(b) The majority of candidates scored two marks for describing the shading of the submerged
plants and the consequences of this on their photosynthesis.
(c) Many candidates scored high marks for explaining both the reduction in oxygen and the
production of nitrates. Few, however, linked the saprobiotic digestion of the proteins in the
dead organic matter to the production of ammonium compounds, and a significant number
were confused as to which bacteria were involved in the process of nitrate production.
(d) Many candidates correctly described the lower species diversity, but only a minority
appreciated the concept of tolerance, instead answering in terms of .aerobic species die.
As in previous questions, poor expression was a problem, with many candidates referring
to different animals’ rather than species.
(i) Most candidates knew the meaning of the term "population". However, imprecise language,
6. as ever, cost marks. A population is all the organisms of one species in a particular area (at
a particular time). It is not all the organisms of a species, or a group of organisms of one
species in a particular area.
(ii) Most candidates explained that deforestation destroys habitats and this reduces the prey
numbers/biomass. However, few used the graph to say that only if the prey biomass fell
below 600 tonnes per 100 km2 would the tiger population decrease.
(a) This was answered well by many students, although some failed to identify the peaks
8. accurately.
(b) This was answered well, with many scoring three marks. Only better answers noted that at
all wavelengths less light energy was passing through, for mark point 1. Very few went on
to point out that photosynthesis would not exceed respiration (mark point 5). Some
students stated that none of the pigments could absorb the wavelengths that pass through,
rather than specifying chlorophyll.
(c) Many students gained one mark here but few achieved both. Many identified that light or
temperature would not be limiting but did not go on to describe how this would affect the
biochemistry of photosynthesis. Some mentioned the use of carbon dioxide in the light-
independent reaction but did not link this to the high use of carbon dioxide, to gain both
mark points 5 and 6. Several answers were seen with a clear misunderstanding that a
higher concentration of oxygen causes a lower concentration of carbon dioxide.
Unit 6
10.
The question in part (i) was well answered. Only those referring to area Y as the ‘blind spot’
failed to gain a mark. In (ii), generally candidates realised the importance of there being cones at
X and rods at Z. Marks were not given when candidates failed to specify which area they were
writing about, X or Z, when explaining that there were more cones. About a third of the
candidates failed to gain the second mark. Candidates appeared to be aware of the greater
acuity of cones but did not relate this to the neural connections.
In (i), although most were able to explain that region Y lacked receptors, some fell short by just
describing it as the ‘blind spot’ or as the point where the optic nerve was joined to the retina.
Descriptions of the two types of photoreceptors were sometimes less than precise, with some
candidates hinting that there were some rods present at X (the fovea) or that there were no
cones at point Z. In (ii), while most understood about retinal convergence of rods, or lack of it for
cones, some had a fundamental lack of understanding and thought that the reason cones gave
more precise vision was due to the way they differentiated between different colours of light.
Some candidates included the term ‘acuity’ in their answers but did not explain the basis of this.
Others used inaccurate terminology and referred to cones each being connected to a single
‘nerve’.