Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC-2022).

IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP22OSV-ART; ISBN: 978-1-6654-6941-8

Model Identification of Electric Vehicle System


2022 Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC) | 978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE | DOI: 10.1109/I-SMAC55078.2022.9987309

Sandeep Kumar Sunori Manoj Chandra Lohani Sudhanshu Maurya Mehul Manu
Department of ECE School of Computing School of Computing Department of Allied Sc.
Graphic Era Hill University Graphic Era Hill University Graphic Era Hill University Graphic Era Hill University
Bhimtal Campus Bhimtal Campus Bhimtal Campus Bhimtal Campus
Bhimtal, India Bhimtal, India Bhimtal, India Bhimtal, India
sandeepsunori@gmail.com getmlohani@gmail.com dr.sm0302@gmail.com photonqunta@gmail.com

Shweta Arora Amit Mittal Pradeep Juneja


Department of PDP Department of EVS Department of ECE
Graphic Era Hill University Graphic Era Hill University Graphic Era University
Bhimtal Campus, India Bhimtal Campus, India Dehradun, India
dr.shwetarora@gmail.com amitforestry26@gmail.com mailjuneja@gmail.com

Abstract- output of this battery pack is very high so it is transformed to


At present, electric vehicle has become a subject of
low voltage by a DC to DC converter. This low DC voltage
curiosity for a common man, and an area of research and
innovation for numerous researchers and inventors runs the vehicle accessories, also recharges the auxiliary
worldwide. The point of attraction is the features owned battery. The speed control of the electric motor is
by an electric vehicle that are not there in the conventional accomplished by the power electronics controller. There is
vehicles. The difference between these two is all about the also a need of maintaining a suitable temperature range within
dc battery taking the position of IC engine. This paper the electric motor. For this, electric vehicles contain a cooling
addresses the model identification of an electric vehicle. system also [1].
The raw data set with numerous input and output values
has been used for identifying the mathematical model of The electric vehicle schematic and its speed control system is
the process. Four different mathematical models have
displayed in Fig.1 [2]. The four basic types of electric vehicle
been identified using the MATLAB. Finally their fitness is
compared. are BEV (Battery Electric Vehicle), the HEV (Hybrid Electric
Vehicle), the PHEV (Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle), and the
Keywords- System identification; Electric vehicle; Transfer FCEV (Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles).
function; Motor; ARX model; State space model; ARMAX model
The BEVs run purely by the battery i.e. there is no
I.INTRODUCTION combustion engine. Their efficiency is more than that of
HEVs and PHEVs. In HEVs, electric motor as well as the
In electric vehicles, the mechanical energy required to rotate
combustion engine is present but the charging of battery can‟t
the wheels is derived from the electric motor transforming
be done through some external plug-in socket. Rather, the
electrical energy into the mechanical energy. The electric
charging takes place by the energy captured while braking (i.e.
input is provided by the dc battery. An electric vehicle supply
regenerative braking). Through regenerative braking, kinetic
equipment (EVSE) is used to charge the dc battery pack. As
energy spent in stopping the vehicle is stored for charging the
there is no internal combustion as in the conventional
battery. The engine plays both the roles here i.e. driving the
vehicles, electric vehicles are pollutant emission-less and
vehicle as well charging the battery. The vehicle is driven
noiseless vehicles. The key component of an electric vehicle is
either by the engine or by the electric motor, or by both
the traction battery pack which energizes the electric motor.
working altogether. In general for gaining maximum
There is a charging port at which the external power supply is
efficiency, electric motor is used at low speed, and engine is
connected to carry out charging of traction battery pack. The
used at high speed. In PHEVs, the charging of battery can be

978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE 847


Authorized licensed use limited to: National Institute of Technology. Downloaded on January 04,2024 at 11:25:58 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC-2022).
IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP22OSV-ART; ISBN: 978-1-6654-6941-8

done both ways that is by plug-in and by the energy gained III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
through braking as well. PHEVs can cover smaller distances
without making any use of the combustion engine. In HEV The speed control system can only be simulated when the
mathematical model of the electric vehicle unit is known. In
there is more consumption of gasoline than that of the
this paper, the only focus is on the development of electric
electrical energy, whereas exactly reverse is the case with vehicle model.
PHEV. In FCEVs, the vehicle is driven only by the electric
motors as in BEVs. However, in FCEVs, the electric motor is In general, there are 3 types of system identification methods.
run by the electricity generated by the fuel cell which does the The first method is the white box modeling wherein the
combination of hydrogen (stored in a tank) with the O2 present knowledge of process internal properties is the only basis of
in air. The recharging of the fuel cells is done by hydrogen identifying the process model. There is no availability of
input-output data. The second method is the black box
refilling [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
modeling wherein the available input-output data is the only
basis of identifying the process model. There is no knowledge
of process internal properties.The third method is the gray box
modeling which is carried out utilizing both the partially
known process properties and input, output data.

Four different models i.e. the transfer function (TF) model,


SS (state space) model, the autoregressive moving average
with exogenous variable (ARMAX) model, & the
autoregressive with exogenous variable (ARX) model have
been obtained using the MATLAB. Finally the step responses
and fitness of all the models is compared. The methodology
pursued is shown by Fig. 2.

Fig.1 Electric Vehicle System

II. LITERATURE SURVEY

C. Maini et al. presented the philosophies implemented in a


new electric car named e2O [11]. C. Wachter et al. presented a
study in which they analyzed the electric motorcycle-taxis (3
wheeled) feasibility in Dar es Salaam on power train. They
also suggested a possible variant of power train [12]. M.
Yaich et al. presented the modeling & simulation of 3
different topologies of electric vehicle. They used ADvanced
Vehicle SimulatOR (ADVISOR) in this work [13]. R. Evode
modeled the electric grid behaviors with charging stations
having G2V and V2G possibilities [14]. H. C. Güldorum et al.
have carried out a work on charging management system
pertaining to the electric vehicles considering V2V concept
[15]. A. R. Kamali and V. Prasanna Moorthy have done a
work based on the charging station for electric vehicles [17].
Fig.2 Methodology

978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE 848


Authorized licensed use limited to: National Institute of Technology. Downloaded on January 04,2024 at 11:25:58 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC-2022).
IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP22OSV-ART; ISBN: 978-1-6654-6941-8

IV. SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )


( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Here, four different mathematical models are simulated using
MATLAB. They are as follows:
(6)
Transfer Function (TF) model:
Here, ( ) = H(z) w(n) (7)

( ) ( ) w(n) denotes the white noise , and H(z) is explored in


equation (8)

( )
( ) (8)
( )
State Space (SS) model:
Clubbing these equations, equation (9) is obtained which
Denoting input and output by u and y respectively with x
represents a general polynomial model.
denoting state vector and w denoting the noise; following is
the state space model: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) (9)
( ) ( )

(2)
For an ARMAX process ( ) ( ). So, equation (9) gets
reduced to equation (10).
(3)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (10)
[ ] The obtained values of Q(z), P(z), and R(z) using the
MATLAB are as follows:

[ ] ( ) (11)

( ) (12)

( ) (13)

Autoregressive with Exogenous Variable (ARX) Model:


[ ]
An ARX process is known to be a particular instance of
Autoregressive Moving Average with Exogenous Variable ARMAX process having ( ) . So, equation (10) is
Model (ARMAX): reduced to equation (14).
A linear system, in general, is characterized by equation (4) i.e ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (14)
[16].
The obtained values of Q(z) and P(z) using the MATLAB are
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) as follows:
Here v(n), x(n), (n) respectively denote the output, input & ( ) (15)
the additive noise. T(z) is explored in equation (5)
( ) (16)
( )
( ) (5)
( )

Clubbing equations (4) and (5), following equation is yielded,

978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE 849


Authorized licensed use limited to: National Institute of Technology. Downloaded on January 04,2024 at 11:25:58 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC-2022).
IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP22OSV-ART; ISBN: 978-1-6654-6941-8

Now, the step response is determined for all the simulated


models and it is compared with the actual measured step
response. This comparison has been displayed in Fig.3. The
resulting modeling error graphs are depicted in Fig.4. This
comparison leads to the result that ARMAX model is the best
model among all the models with the highest fitness of 77.48
% as shown in Table I. The fitness of TF, SS, and ARX
models are respectively 75.68 %, 49.31 % and 60.06 %.

Fig.4 Modeling error

TABLE I. Fitness of obtained models

Fig.3 Step response of obtained models of electric vehicle

V. CONCLUSION

In this article, an attempt is done to identify the


mathematical model of the electric vehicle. Using MATLAB,
four different models i.e. ARMAX model, ARX model, state
space model, and transfer function model, are identified.
Having compared their step response with the measured
output, their fitness is accessed. It is found that among four
identified models, the fit model is the ARMAX model.

978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE 850


Authorized licensed use limited to: National Institute of Technology. Downloaded on January 04,2024 at 11:25:58 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC-2022).
IEEE Xplore Part Number: CFP22OSV-ART; ISBN: 978-1-6654-6941-8

REFERENCES

[1]. https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/how-do-all-electric-cars-work
[2]. https://tejasnikumbh.com/components-of-electric-vehicle-ev/
[3]. Arjun D Pawar, “Understanding the types of Electric Vehicles | BEV |
HEV | PHEV,” 16 May 2020, (https://evduniya.com/ev-global/what-are-
the-types-of-electric-vehicles-bev-hev-phev.html)
[4].Chanel Lee, “What is EV, BEV, HEV, PHEV? Here‟s your guide to types
of electric cars,” 14 April, 2021.
(https://www.marketwatch.com/story/what-is-ev-bev-hev-phev-heres-
your-guide-to-types-of-electric-cars-11617986782)
[5]. https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/Difference-between-
BEV-PHEV-and-HEV.html
[6]. https://e-amrit.niti.gov.in/types-of-electric-vehicles#
[7].https://www.aptiv.com/en/insights/article/bev-phev-or-hev-the-
differences-affect-the-architecture
[8]. https://www.evgo.com/ev-drivers/types-of-evs/
[9]. https://www.synergy.net.au/Our-energy/For-you/Electric-Vehicles/Learn-
about-electric-vehicles
[10]. https://x-engineer.org/battery-electric-vehicle-bev/
[11].C. Maini, K. Gopal and R. Prakash, "Making of an „all reason‟ electric
Vehicle," 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition
(EVS27), 2013, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/EVS.2013.6915015.
[12].C. Wachter et al., "Electric three-wheelers as an alternative to
combustion-engined autorickshaws in Dar es Salaam - Generation of a
standard drive cycle, Power Train modelling and simulation of the
energy demand of light electric vehicles," 2020 Fifteenth International
Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER),
2020, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/EVER48776.2020.9242941.
[13].M. Yaich, M. R. Hachicha and M. Ghariani, "Modeling and simulation of
electric and hybrid vehicles for recreational vehicle," 2015 16th
International Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic
Control and Computer Engineering (STA), 2015, pp. 181-187, doi:
10.1109/STA.2015.7505098.
[14].R. Evode, "Modeling of Electric Grid Behaviors having Electric Vehicle
charging stations with G2V and V2G Possibilities," 2021 International
Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics
Engineering (ICECCME), 2021, pp. 1-5.
[15].H. C. Güldorum, İ. Şengör and O. Erdinç, "Charging Management
System for Electric Vehicles considering Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V)
Concept," 2020 12th International Conference on Electrical and
Electronics Engineering (ELECO), 2020, pp. 188-192.
[16].S. K. Sunori, P. K. Juneja, M. Chaturvedi and A. Bansal, "System
Identification of Cane Carrier Process of Sugar Mill," 2018 International
Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and
Networking (ICACCCN), 2018, pp. 758-761.
[17]. A. R. Kamali, V. Prasanna Moorthy, "Design of Solar and Battery
Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging Station," Journal of Trends in
Computer Science and Smart Technology, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2022, pp.
30-37.

978-1-6654-6941-8/22/$31.00 ©2022 IEEE 851


Authorized licensed use limited to: National Institute of Technology. Downloaded on January 04,2024 at 11:25:58 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like