Group 2 gave an oral presentation titled "Unit 7: Inspire to protect". The content was found to be interesting and clearly stated the main points of the topic. The structure of the presentation was clear and divided into small, logical sections. The speaker spoke clearly and used visual aids effectively. They concluded with an engaging game for the audience. In the discussion, the speaker adequately answered questions and involved the audience. The chairperson properly introduced the speaker and controlled the questioning. The overall presentation received a mark of 9.25 out of 10.
Group 2 gave an oral presentation titled "Unit 7: Inspire to protect". The content was found to be interesting and clearly stated the main points of the topic. The structure of the presentation was clear and divided into small, logical sections. The speaker spoke clearly and used visual aids effectively. They concluded with an engaging game for the audience. In the discussion, the speaker adequately answered questions and involved the audience. The chairperson properly introduced the speaker and controlled the questioning. The overall presentation received a mark of 9.25 out of 10.
Group 2 gave an oral presentation titled "Unit 7: Inspire to protect". The content was found to be interesting and clearly stated the main points of the topic. The structure of the presentation was clear and divided into small, logical sections. The speaker spoke clearly and used visual aids effectively. They concluded with an engaging game for the audience. In the discussion, the speaker adequately answered questions and involved the audience. The chairperson properly introduced the speaker and controlled the questioning. The overall presentation received a mark of 9.25 out of 10.
Group 2 gave an oral presentation titled "Unit 7: Inspire to protect". The content was found to be interesting and clearly stated the main points of the topic. The structure of the presentation was clear and divided into small, logical sections. The speaker spoke clearly and used visual aids effectively. They concluded with an engaging game for the audience. In the discussion, the speaker adequately answered questions and involved the audience. The chairperson properly introduced the speaker and controlled the questioning. The overall presentation received a mark of 9.25 out of 10.
Chairperson: A. CONTENT: 2ms (1 max for each item) QUESTIONS MARKS GIVEN COMMENT
Was the content interesting? 1
Was the content clearly state the main 1 points of the topic?
B. STRUCTURE: 2ms (0.5 max for each item)
QUESTIONS MARKS GIVEN COMMENT
Was the structure clear at the start? 0.5
Was the seminar divided into small, 0.5 manageable sections? Were the sections in logical order? 0.5 Was the scope of the topic mentioned? 0.5
C. PRESENTATION: 4ms (0.25 max for each item)
QUESTIONS MARKS GIVEN COMMENT
Did the speaker(s) speak clearly and 0.25
audibly? Did the speaker(s) keep eye contact with the audience? Did the speaker(s) avoid reading from 0.2 written script? Did the speaker(s) try to get the 0.25 audience involved? Were the visual aids effective? 0.25 Did the speaker have a good and clear 0.25 The group has an interesting game in beginning and conclusion? conclusion. Did the speaker(s) ensure overall 0.25 coherence to the talk? Was the talk presented within the time 0.25 limit?
D. DISCUSSION SESSION: 1ms (1m max for each item)
QUESTIONS MARKS GIVEN COMMENT
Did the speaker(s) deal well with 0.5
questions? Did the speaker(s) involve the 0.25 audience, e.g. by asking questions?
E. ROLE OF CHAIRPERSON: 1m (0.5 max for each item)
QUESTIONS MARKS GIVEN COMMENT
Did the chairperson introduce 0.5
speaker(s) and their topics well? Did the chairperson control questions 0.5 and comments?