Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theoretical Plate - An Overview - ScienceDirect Topics
Theoretical Plate - An Overview - ScienceDirect Topics
From:
Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry (Third Edition),
2017
Related terms:
8.2.4 Efficiency
The efficiency of a column is measured by the number of theoretical
plates (N), or more often, the height equivalent to a theoretical plate
(HETP or H). The theoretical plate number (N) usually is expressed by one
of two equations [9]:
2
𝑁 = 16 ⋅ (𝑤𝑡𝑅𝑏 ) (Equation 8-2)
or
𝑡 2 (Equation 8-3)
𝑁 = 5.545 ⋅ (𝑤𝑅ℎ )
where tR refers to the retention time of the peak and Wb refers to the
peak width at baseline in Equation 8-2 and Wh its width at half-height in
Equation 8-3. Figure 8-3 illustrates the values used with these equations.
The higher the plate number N, the greater the efficiency of the column.
One can understand quickly that the narrower the peak (low W), the
higher N, and thus the efficiency. Efficiency is thus a measure of peak
broadening; an efficient system will result in narrow peaks, whereas a
less efficient column will contribute to band broadening.
FIGURE 8-3. The different values used to calculate the plate number (N).
The height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) can be calculated
when both N and the column length (L) are known [10, 11]:
As a result, the lower the HETP, the better the resolution and the more
efficient the separation. Efficiency is optimized when N is maximized and
HETP is minimized. The van Deemter equation is another way of
expressing efficiency; it takes into account three factors that, along with
the mobile phase linear velocity, will affect efficiency and, therefore, the
HETP value [13]. These factors are represented by the variables A, B, and C
in the van Deemter equation [10]:
𝜇= 𝐿 (Equation 8-6)
t𝑀
where L is the length of the column [cm] and tM is the retention time[s] of
an unretained analyte (dead time). The mobile phase linear velocity, μ,
therefore is expressed in cm/s.
Using the van Deemter equation, one can plot the efficiency of a carrier
gas in terms of HETP as the dependent variable (y-axis) against the linear
velocity as the independent variable (x-axis). This plot is referred to as a
van Deemter plot, and can be used to compare the efficiency of one
carrier gas to another (see Figure 8-4).
FIGURE 8-4. A van Deemter plot showing the effect of each variable from
the corresponding equation. Note that the Eddy diffusion is independent
of the linear velocity, thus it is constant. Because the resistance to mass
transfer (C) is multiplied by the linear velocity, it increases with μ. The
invert occurs with the molecular diffusion (B).
All three parameters (A, B, and C) lead to band broadening: the spreading
apart of a group of identical analytes throughout the system. By
minimizing band broadening, identical analytes stick together and a
better separation is obtained because peaks are narrow rather than broad.
With Figure 8-4, one can quickly appreciate the influence of the mobile
phase flow rate on each parameter. The A term in the van Deemter
equation is relevant only to packed column systems and thus is constant
for a given column. Nevertheless, it is independent of the linear velocity μ
as indicated by Equation 8-5 and Figure 8-4. The B term represents the
natural tendency of the analytes to redistribute themselves from a region
of high concentration to a region of lower concentration in the mobile
phase [2]. Finally, the C term, resistance to mass transfer, represents the
fact that the transfer of an analyte from the mobile to the stationary
phase and vice versa is not instantaneous and has a certain inertia. As a
result, the analyte concentration profile of the stationary phase is slightly
behind the equilibrium position and the analyte concentration profile of
the mobile phase is slightly ahead of the equilibrium position [2]. As
expected, the C term increases with the flow rate as shown in Figure 8-4.
Since the Eddy diffusion does not apply to capillary columns, it may be
useful to become familiar with the Golay equation, in which the A term
has been removed and the C term has been expended [8]:
where Cs is the mass transfer from the stationary phase to the mobile one
and Cm is the mass transfer from the mobile phase to the stationary one.
where d is the separation between two peaks (measured from top to top)
and W1 and W2 are the widths at baseline of the two peaks. This is
illustrated in Figure 8-5.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780126639711500129
Bioseparation Engineering
Oliver Kaltenbrunner, ... Shuichi Yamamoto, in
Progress in Biotechnology, 2000
𝑑𝑝 ⋅ 𝜀 ⋅ 𝑢 𝑣 𝑢 0 ⋅ 𝑑𝑝 Equation 4
Re ⋅ Sc = 𝑣 ⋅ 𝐷𝑚 = 𝐷𝑚
and HETP data can be made dimensionless by eqn. 4. The optimal flow
velocity for the test is when the ratio between the a term and the total h is
a maximum. This ensures the greatest contribution is from the packing
effects and minimizes the contribution from diffusion and mass transfer
limitations. Figure 4 shows a plot of the ratio a/h from Equation 3 versus
the flow velocity ReSc. Testing a column at a linear velocity of ReSc < 5
cannot give reliable information on the quality of the column packing.
HETP values in this range primarily reflect diffusion of tracer ions and is
strongly influenced by temperature and flow rate variations Conversely,
the higher the linear flow velocity, the greater is the contribution from
mass transfer limitations (c-term) and the higher the back pressure.
Hence, the best operating range is at linear velocities of 5 < ReSc < 15 which
ensures a high contribution of the a term.
For small particles, the optimum test region is restricted by back pressure
constraints. Applying the Kozeny Carman equation (12)
3 𝑑𝑝
2
(6)
𝑢0 = 𝜀
⋅ Δp
270 ⋅ 1 − 𝜀 𝜇 𝐿
2
allows for an estimate of the maximum column length (Lmax) for a given
dp and a back pressure (Δpmax) limitation. When equations 6 and 4 are
combined, Lmax to allow ReSc = 5 at Δpmax is
𝛥𝑝max 𝑑𝑝 𝜀
3
3
(7)
𝐿max = 𝜇 ⋅ 1350 ⋅ 𝐷𝑚 ⋅ 1 − 𝜀2
For the test method with injections of 1 M NaCl in a 0.1 to 0.2 M NaCl
equilibration buffer at 20 °C (μ0.2M Nacl, 20°C = 1.024 cP) and assuming ε = 0.4
and Dm = 1.5 10- 5 cm2s- 1, the equation simplifies to
𝛥𝑝max ⋅ 𝑑𝑝
3
(8)
𝐿max = 6
1.25 ⋅ 10
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921042300800362
Unit Operations
Pauline M. Doran, in Bioprocess Engineering Principles, 1995
𝐻 = 𝐴𝑢 + 𝐵𝑢 + 𝐶 (10.44)
𝑁 = 16(𝑉𝑤e )
2 (10.45)
𝑁 = 𝐻L (10.46)
where L is the length of the column. For a given column, the greater the
number of theoretical plates the greater is the number of ideal
equilibrium stages in the system and the more efficient is the separation.
Values of H and N vary for a particular column depending on the
component being separated.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780122208553500109
CHROMATOGRAPHY | Principles
V.R. Meyer, in Encyclopedia of Analytical Science (Second Edition),
2005
𝑡 2 𝑡 2 ℎ 𝑡 2 [8]
𝑁 = 16 𝑤R = 5.54𝑤1R/ 2 = 2𝜋 𝐴P PR
where w1/2 is the peak width at half height of the peak; hP is the peak
height; and AP is the peak area.
𝐿
𝐻=𝑁 [9]
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123693977000893
System properties
Numerous investigations have tried to correlate experimental HETP data
with the distillation system fluid physical properties. The best and most
consistent correlations tend to confirm that the HETP is proportional to
reference HETPo and a factor proportional to the system physical
properties:
𝑛 𝑛 [15]
HETP = HETPo (𝜇𝛼 / 𝑆g 𝛿) / (𝜇𝛼 / 𝑆g 𝛿)
0
when the n exponent best fit is between 0.15 and 0.21. Replacing HETPo
from eqn [14] into eqn [15], and using the reference system we obtain:
f
HETP=(2.0𝐾p / 𝐹p )(𝜇𝛼 / 𝑆g 𝛿)
0.2 [16]
HETP=𝜆ln(𝜆) / (𝜆 − 1)HTU
f
HETP=(2.0𝐾p / 𝐹p )(𝜇𝛼 / 𝑆g 𝛿)
0.2
𝑓(𝜆) [17]
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122267702006517
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780127423562500043
Methods
A. Shallan, ... M. Breadmore, in
Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences (Second Edition), 2013
Background Electrolytes
The composition of the electrolytes inside the capillary is typically what
defines the mode of separation that occurs and the order in which peaks
move past the detector. The solution chemistry requirements for the
mode of separation are discussed in more detail below, but within each
separation mode, variation of the composition will change the selectivity.
Taking zone electrophoresis, for example, the exact composition of the
electrolyte will influence the sensitivity, resolution, and separation time,
as depicted in Figure 4. For example, changing the pH of the electrolyte
will change the net charge of weak acids and bases which will impact
upon the μep leading to a change in resolution and separation time. pH
may also change the surface charge and zeta potential of the capillary
thus changing the EOF, which will also impact upon the same criteria.
Changing the pH of the electrolyte will also change the ionic strength,
which will impact on both μep and EOF, thus also influencing the
separation. Similarly, adding an organic solvent such as methanol will
change the solvation of the ions and the viscosity of the electrolyte, which
will again influence mobility and EOF.
Once conditions for a basic separation have been established, there are
then a myriad of electrolyte additives that can be used to enhance the
separation in one way or another. This may be simply changing the type
of salts used in the electrolyte (through for example, differences in ion-
association interaction), changing the solvent (organic solvents and mixed
solvents can provide uniquely different selectivity), and the addition of
additives to alter charge or size through secondary equilibria, and various
combinations of these. It is this ability to vary the position of a peak
within a separation and to adjust the conditions to manipulate the system
to achieve the desired outcome that is one of the reasons that
electrophoresis is such a powerful separation technique. The other is the
high efficiency.
Maximizing Efficiency
It is misleading to discuss theoretical plates in electrophoresis;
nevertheless, it is a convenient concept to describe analyte peak shape
and for comparison with other separation techniques. Efficiency is
described by the number of theoretical plates (N) and is related to the
height equivalent to the theoretical plates (Hth) by
𝐿
𝑁 = 𝐻d [7]
th
2
𝑁 = 5.54𝑤1𝑡/ 2 = µapp × 2𝐷𝑉m [8]
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123821652002415
CHROMATOGRAPHY | Convective
Transport in Chromatographic Media
A.E. Rodrigues, in Encyclopedia of Separation Science, 2000
Conventional Packings
The column performance can be assessed in terms of HETP as a function
of bed superficial velocity following the classic van Deemter analysis. The
van Deemter equation for linearly retained species in conventional
packings of sphere geometry is:
𝜀p (1 − 𝜀b )𝑏
2
[2]
HETP = 𝐴 + 𝑢𝐵0 + 15
2
2 𝜏d 𝑢 0
[𝜀b + 𝜀p (1 − 𝜀b )𝑏]
with:
2
𝜀p (1 − 𝜀b )𝑏
𝐶 = 15
2
2 𝜏d
[𝜀b + 𝜀p (1 − 𝜀b )𝑏]
For protein separation the B term is negligible and the plot HETP versus u0
in HPLC is a straight line in most of the domain when conventional
supports are used. Moreover, the HETP increases with the square of the
particle size.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0122267702055010
Bioseparation Engineering
E.K. Lee, S.J. Ahn, in Progress in Biotechnology, 2000
2
𝑁req = 16𝑅s 𝛼𝛼− 1
2 𝑘 + 12 [1]
𝑘
′ ′
where the separation factor 𝛼 = 𝑡R2 / 𝑡R1 , and retention factor k refers to
the last eluting peak in the pair. Rs is measured experimentally as
𝑅s =
Δ𝑡R [2]
4𝜎
𝑡R = 16𝑅
2 𝐻 1 + 𝑘3 𝛼 2 [3]
𝑢¯ 𝑘 𝛼−1
2
Equation [3] reveals that the column temperature (because this influences
k), carrier gas linear velocity (which will change the plate duration (the
Purnell criterion) 𝐻 / 𝑢¯ ), and column selectivity (affects k; α/α − 1) are
important considerations for reducing analysis time.
Since it is likely that the critical pair of components will not be the last
eluting peaks, they do not provide the best indication of the total analysis
time; however, this can be given by eqn [4]:
𝑡R = (𝐿 / 𝑢¯ )(𝑘𝑛 + 1) [4]
where L is the column length, 𝑢¯ the average linear velocity of the carrier
gas, and kn the retention factor of the last eluting compound in the
sample.
Equation [4] is very useful for deducing the general operating
requirements of high-speed analysis. The use of a short column, a higher
than usual carrier gas velocity, and relatively small retention factors
(which can be easily achieved by using high temperature and/or thin film
columns), can reduce analysis times significantly. There will, however, be
a penalty associated with reducing the analysis time by using these
straightforward steps, namely a reduction in the resolving power due to
reduced peak capacity and increased band broadening. Equation [4] does
not implicitly allow the effective resolution of the system to be evaluated.
Column selection and stationary phase selectivity can play a major role in
reducing the requirement for very high plate numbers. For example, a
relatively new PLOT capillary column, which uses a polar adsorbent as the
stationary phase, has unique selectivity toward oxygenated compounds.
The capability of such a stationary phase column to provide excellent
separation of oxygenates in the presence of hydrocarbons is illustrated in
Figure 1. Stationary phase selectivity can be manipulated to achieve better
separation of target compounds in a shorter time than would normally be
required using a nonselective column, but stationary phase optimization
will be limited to the analysis of low-complexity samples, i.e., those
containing fewer than say 50 components, or to mixtures containing a
small number of target analytes. This is supported by statistical overlap
theory, in which the extent of peak overlap in gas chromatograms of
complex mixtures can be predicted.
Figure 1. The use of a selective stationary phase column for the high-
speed analysis of ethanol in unleaded petrol.
URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0123693977007287
All content on this site: Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are
reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open
access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply.