The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age, with online coaching

platforms becoming prevalent. Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in-person
coach. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Online coaching has become more popular in this digital era due to the expansion of ed-tech
platforms. Though I agree that learning remotely is more easily accessible, traditional
classrooms do offer higher educational quality.

People are becoming busier as a result of hectic lifestyles and heavy workloads.
Consequently, they would prefer online tutoring, given its convenience. E-learning allows
people to study anywhere and anytime, as long as their computers are connected to the
Internet. Access to a wide range of resources helps learners freely choose between different
skills or majors they want to focus on. For example, people who sign up for Masterclass can
get lessons taught by respected and renowned experts from different industries in a series of
high-quality video lessons.

Though learning via the Internet provides certain advantages, traditional classrooms provide
more space for interaction between teachers and students. This will lead to a strong and
reliable relationship where learners feel encouraged and motivated to move towards their
goals. Studying in person reduces technology dependency and therefore creates a more
structured environment where discipline and routine are nurtured. While online learning
provides flexibility in terms of when and where you can study, traditional classrooms follow a
fixed schedule and require you to be present at a specific location. Offline education will not
suffer from Internet limitations; as a result, students will have more opportunities to gain
practical experiences, like lab experiments or field trip studies.

In conclusion, I believe online coaching has its own advantages in terms of accessibility and
customization; however, the emphasis on high education standards that traditional teaching
brings should not be neglected.