Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Download Ebook PDF Human Communication in Society 4th Edition by Alberts PDF
Full Download Ebook PDF Human Communication in Society 4th Edition by Alberts PDF
vii
viii Contents
7
Regionality 105
Ethnicity and Race 106
Listening and Responding 144
Education and Occupation 107 The Importance of Listening 145
The Individual, Verbal Communication, and Society: What Is Listening? Four Stages 147
Language, Perception, and Power 108 Listening and the Individual: Influences
Language and Perception 108 and Barriers 148
Language and Power 109 Influences on Listening 149
Power and Words 110 Barriers to Listening 154
Contents ix
The Individual, Small Group Communication, What Is Rhetoric? A Broader View 292
and Society: Power and Diversity 249 The Rhetor: Rhetoric’s Point of Origin 293
Power and Group Communication 249 Ethos, Pathos, and Logos 294
Cultural Diversity and Small Group Communication 250 Social Position and Relationship to Audiences 295
Ethics and Small Group Communication 252 The Individual, Rhetoric, and Society 296
Improving Your Small Group Communication Skills 253 Reaffirming Cultural Values 297
Summary 254 • Key Terms 255 • Apply What You
Increasing Democratic Participation 297
Know 255
Bringing About Justice 298
alternatIve vIew
Prompting Social Change 299
Hate teamwork? you’re not alone 225
Ethics and Rhetoric 300
DID you Know?
Using Your Rhetorical Skills: Speaking in Public 301
Introverts Can Be leaders too 235
Understanding the Communication Event:
Handling Conflicts in virtual teams 243
The Synergetic Model 301
Procedures that Help Groups agree 244
Researching and Organizing Your Presentation 304
the ultimate list of virtual team technology tools 248
Rehearsing and Delivering Your Speech 309
CoMMunICatIon In SoCIety
Summary 312 • Key Terms 312 • Apply What You
CoIns: Innovation now? 247 Know 313
DID you Know?
11 Communicating in Organizations 256 Frederick Douglass 291
The Importance of Organizational Communication 257 CoMMunICatIon In SoCIety
Defining Organizational Communication 258 Communication event Checklist 304
Organizations from a Communication Perspective 258 alternatIve vIew
Communication Function and Structure 259 PowerPoint Is evil: Power Corrupts. PowerPoint
Organizational Culture 260 Corrupts absolutely 307
Organizational Communication and the Individual 263
Assimilation 263 13 Mass Media and Communication 314
Supervisor–Subordinate Communication 265 The Importance of Mass Media 315
Communicating with Coworkers 267 What are Mass Media? 317
Organizational Dilemmas 269 The Individual and Mass Media 320
The Individual, Organizational Communication, How Media Messages Affect the Individual 320
and Society 273 How Individuals Choose Media Messages 321
Societal Influences on Organizations 273 How Individuals Resist Media Messages 325
Influence of Organizations on Individuals and Society 275 The Individual, Mass Media, and Society 326
Organizations, Communication, and Power 277 Confirming Social Identities 326
Ethics and Organizational Communication 281 Understanding the World 329
Improving Your Organizational Communication Skills 282 Agenda-Setting Capacity 330
Summary 284 • Key Terms 284 • Apply What You
Interpreting Media Events 331
Know 284 • Explore 285
Monitoring Media Violence 332
DID you Know?
Analyzing Media Economics 334
Comparing Corporate Cultures 260
Ethics and Mass Media 336
alternatIve vIew
Becoming a More Effective Media Consumer 338
what Is a “real Job”? 265
Be an Active Agent 339
CoMMunICatIon In SoCIety
Broaden Your Media Horizons 339
Case Study: anti-Globalization Protests 275
Talk Back 339
employer responses to workplace Bullying 278
Summary 340 • Key Terms 340 • Apply What You
A
s experienced researchers and instructors in and we devote full chapters to communication and mass
the field of communication, we continue to be media (Chapter 13) and to communication and interactive
impressed by the breadth and depth of scholarship media (Chapter 14). Overall, we discuss the full range of
in our discipline; we also recognize that this scholarship paradigmatic approaches in the field, offering a balance
presents challenges for students and instructors in the intro- between theory and practice.
ductory survey course. For example, which research tradi-
tions should be covered: the traditional functionalist and
psychological perspectives, the interpretive-qualitative per- New To This Edition
spectives, or the more recent critical perspectives? Which
REVEL™
subfields should be covered: intercultural communication,
Educational technology designed for the way today’s stu-
communication technologies, nonverbal communication,
dents read, think, and learn
or rhetorical studies? Should instructors focus primarily on
helping students develop communication skills or should When students are engaged deeply, they learn more effec-
they focus primarily on theories and inquiry? tively and perform better in their courses. This simple fact
Our struggle to answer these questions led us to write inspired the creation of REVEL: an immersive learning expe-
the first edition of this text, which we believe met the goals rience designed for the way today’s students read, think,
we established early on: first, to expose beginning students and learn. Built in collaboration with educators and students
to the breadth and depth of our discipline’s scholarship, and nationwide, REVEL is the newest, fully digital way to deliver
second, to provide a balance between theory and applica- respected Pearson content.
tion. Finally, our third goal was to present a lively overview REVEL enlivens course content with media interactives
of the discipline, to meet students “where they live,” and to and assessments—integrated directly within the authors’
engage them in exploring the implications of communica- narrative—that provide opportunities for students to read
tion in their daily lives. about and practice course material in tandem. This immersive
Our overarching theme for the first edition was the educational technology boosts student engagement, which
interaction between the individual and society. In subse- leads to better understanding of concepts and improved
quent editions, we’ve enhanced the emphasis on this theme, performance throughout the course.
adding new examples, illustrations, and pedagogical mate-
rials that connect the more traditional individual-centered, Learn more about REVEL
functionalist approach—that is, “who you are affects how http://www.pearsonhighered.com/revel/
you communicate”—with more contemporary critical
approaches, which focus on the impact of societal structures Rather than simply offering opportunities to read about
and history on communication outcomes. and study human communication, REVEL facilitates deep,
By highlighting this tension between individual and engaging interactions with the concepts that matter most.
societal forces, we encourage students to recognize the value For example, students can complete a self-assessment to
of multiple perspectives in understanding communication. gauge their own communication style and explore ways to
Human Communication in Society, Fourth Edition, like improve upon their skills. Students can respond to ethical
previous editions, covers the full range of topics addressed issues in communication and see how their responses com-
in existing textbooks but also introduces some useful inno- pare to others’. Students may interactively explore different
vations. We begin by describing the theoretical foundations theories of and approaches to communication, see how com-
of the study of communication, including models of com- munication shapes identity, review the components of lan-
munication, historical and contemporary approaches, and guage and stages of listening, assess models for relationship
the role of identity in communication. We present the fac- development, and analyze group roles and communication
tors of perception, verbal and nonverbal communication, structures in organizations. Students may interactively see
and listening and responding. We then explore communica- how individual factors, cultural influences, and ethnocen-
tion in various contexts such as culture, close relationships, tric biases shape the way people perceive others and their
small groups, and organizations. Ours is the first book to world. By providing opportunities to read about and prac-
provide comprehensive coverage of rhetoric (Chapter 12), tice communication in tandem, REVEL engages students
xiii
xiv Preface
directly and immediately, which leads to a better under- • Chapter 4 has been revised to include a third type of
standing of course material. A wealth of student and instruc- attribution error, over-attribution.
tor resources and interactive materials can be found within • Chapter 9 includes revisions and reorganization of the
REVEL. Some of our favorites include: material on relationship theories and models. New the-
• Videos and Video Quizzes Videos throughout the ories have been introduced, including social exchange
narrative show the various ways such factors as ethics, and equity theories. Additional research on the expe-
culture, language, and listening skills shape the act of riences of gays and lesbians in close relationships has
communication to boost mastery. Many videos are bun- been included.
dled with correlating self-checks, enabling students to • Chapters 13 and 14 (“Mass Media and Communica-
test their knowledge. tion” and “Communicating Through Social and Other
• Interactive Visual Summaries Visual Summaries Interactive Media”) have been updated and revised to
enable students to interactively explore key points in more clearly differentiate between communication pro-
the narrative to focus their attention and strengthen cesses that occur in mass media and interactive media,
their understanding of bedrock concepts. respectively.
• Animated Figures Animated figures help students • References in each chapter have been updated to re-
understand hard-to-grasp concepts through interac- flect the most recent available research on the topics
tive visualizations. addressed.
• Audio Narratives In-text audio narratives bring the “It • Updated examples that address contemporary events
Happened to Me” stories to life, adding dimension and and trends will help students connect the concepts to
reinforcing learning in a way that a printed text cannot. their personal experiences and concerns.
• Integrated Writing Opportunities To help students
connect chapter content with personal meaning, each
chapter offers two varieties of writing prompts: the Chapter-By-Chapter Descriptions
Journal prompt, eliciting free-form topic-specific re-
sponses addressing topics at the module level, and the Part 1
Shared Writing prompt, which encourages students to Chapter 1 explains the theme of this book—the interaction
share and respond to one another’s brief response to between the individual and society—as well as introducing
high-interest topics in the chapter. important communication concepts and models. This chap-
ter has been revised to include a new section titled “Putting it
For more information about all of the tools and resources
all Together” that explains what competent communication
in REVEL and access to your own REVEL account for the
is and how students can become more competent as they
Human Communication in Society, Fourth Edition, go to
learn communication processes. Students are encouraged to
www.pearsonhighered.com/REVEL
consider how each skill and theory can help them communi-
In addition to the immersive learning experience
cate more appropriately, effectively—and ethically.
offered by REVEL, we’ve refined and updated the content
Chapter 2 focuses on current research paradigms and
in this new edition to create a powerful and contemporary
methods. Additional research-based examples, including
resource for helping speakers connect to their audience.
those focused on recent interactive media research, have
We’ve added several new features and revised features that
been added. In addition, a new opening example on conflict
both instructors and students have praised.
in a romantic relationship related to social media use, revis-
In this edition, general changes include new examples,
ited throughout the chapter, illustrates the applicability of
theories, and applications that reflect the pervasiveness
theories and methods to everyday communicators’ lives.
of social and other interactive media. Also, new opening
Chapter 3 explores the relationship between communi-
vignettes have been added that focus on the main character
cation and identities. This edition includes updated exam-
from Chapter 1. General changes to each chapter include:
ples with a focus on digital media, including apps, and the
• Chapter 1 has been revised to include a new section issue of online identities with “catfishing.” It also includes
titled “Putting it all Together” that explains what com- expanded discussion of the performance of identity, includ-
petent communication is and how students can learn ing self-presentation, and a more complex notion of gender
to become more competent as they learn introductory identity with Facebook’s 56 gender options.
communication processes. Chapter 4 focuses on communication and perception.
• Chapter 2 has been revised to include more exam- Changes include a tighter and clearer discussion of cog-
ples of studies conducted from within the three major nitive structures as well as the inclusion of a third type of
paradigms. attribution error, over-attribution.
Preface xv
• Chapter summaries conclude each chapter. • Exercises and activities. “Apply What You Know”
questions encourage students to work through chal-
Summary lenging concepts.
Learning about identities and communication is important personal identity deve
for at least five reasons: (1) we bring our identities to each als, self-concept, and s
communication interaction, (2) communication interac- The primary ide
tions create and shape identities, (3) identity plays a key ethnicity, gender, sex
role in intercultural communication, (4) much of our life and religion—are con
is organized around specific identities, and (5) identity social forces and what
is a key site in which individual and societal forces come identities. Individuals
together. performances are subj
Identities are defined social categories, and each of too far from social exp
us is made up of many of them. They may be primary or lead to disciplinary ac
secondary. Primary identities (race, ethnicity, age) are the Ethical concerns
focus in this chapter and have the most consistent and based on their identit
enduring impact on our lives; secondary identities, such
as occupation and marital status, are more changeable
nication include learn
within all identity gr
Student Engagement
over the life span and from situation to situation Our language or reducing We like to think that we have translated our commitment to
the field and our love of teaching into a text that will engage
students. We encourage this involvement with the follow-
Emphasis on Ethics in ing pedagogical features:
Communication • “It Happened to Me” boxes offer real-life accounts of
Each chapter includes one or more detailed sections dis- student experiences that provide a “hook” to important
cussing ethical issues relevant to that chapter’s communi- communication concepts.
cation topic.
3.5 Ethics and Identity characteristics, we also evaluate how desirable those characteristics ar
cussed, the generalized other becomes the basis for our understand
3.5 Discuss three ethical considerations for communicating in a sensitive manner characteristi
to and about others’ identities.
It Happened to Me example, A
through the
As you are probably aware, a person’s sense of identity is central to how he or she
functions in the world. Moreover, because identities derive their meanings from $KCPEC family, frien
society, every identity comes with values attached to it. The ways we communicate their comm
I really relate to the concept of reflected appraisals. I was born in Brazil with an Italian sion is a ne
may reflect these values. If you wish to be sensitive to other people’s identities, you mother and a Brazilian father. When I attended an all-girls private school in Cleveland,
should be aware of at least three key ethical issues that can impact your communi- should min
Ohio, I had a very difficult time blending in. After spending so much time with these other
cation with others. (Kraybill,
students, however, I gradually began feeling like one of them. I was speaking English all the
One issue you might consider is how you communicate with people whose iden- in gangs, a
time, even at home with my parents (whose first language is not English). I felt like I was an
tities are more, or less, valued. What do we mean by more or less valued? You prob- American. People communicated to me as an American. In my junior year, I moved back and encour
ably already know. In the United States, for example, which of the following identities to Brazil. Being Brazilian and speaking Portuguese fluently, their reflections of me made me nity membe
is more highly valued: White or multiracial? Male or female? Lawyer or school bus feel completely Brazilian and I began to lose my sense of American identity. Even today, (Sanders, 19
driver? Still, these rankings are not necessarily consistent across cultures. In Denmark, at a U.S. college, I feel confused about my selfhood because of the different ways I am Once w
for example, work identities do not follow the same hierarchical pattern as those in the reflected off of people depending on which nationality group I am hanging out with. characteristi
United States (Mikkelsen & Einarsen, 2001). Thus, Danes are more likely to view street disdained) i
dd t i l l b th d ’t l hi h l th
Drew: It is true that twins share a brain. Ha! Well, at least we can complete each other’s sentences. We are extremely
driven and also share a huge enthusiasm for using our voices to bring awareness to charities we are passionate about. As
for differences, Jonathan is an illusionist; that’s not my forte. However, I am a total fitness and health junky. I spend a lot of
time playing sports and working out. Feel free to ask Jonathan how he likes my protein shakes.
Communication in Society Jonathan: Drew and I have the same drive and passion in everything we do. The reason we work so well together
is because we have a “no B.S.” policy and always get everything out on the table. As far as differences, well, everybody
knows I have much better hair (Chareunsy, 2013).
4GȨGEVGF#RRTCKUCNU#HHGEV#NNQH7Ut'XGPVJG4KE Most twins strive to differentiate themselves from one another (Prainsack & Spector, 2006), whether that means
dressing differently or pursuing disparate hobbies and careers. However for famous twins, developing separate identi -
ties is a greater challenge than for most. Jonathan and Drew Scott of Property Brothers became celebrities through
How does the looking-glass self explain successful people’s He said he doesn’t the shows they make together on HGTV. Celebrity twins Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, James and Oliver Phelps (who
low self-esteem and poor self-concepts? Why do you think problem for him. play the Weasley twins in the Harry Potter movies), and Dylan and Cole Sprouse (of Disney’s The Suite Life of Zack and
Cody) all became famous either playing twins or playing the same character on television and in movies. Because their
their significant success does not change how they feel about What accounts professional identities are so closely connected, people often forget that they have the same needs as “singletons” to be
themselves? How do the concepts particular other and gen- talented and attract seen as unique and individual. Consequently, they have to remind us—and remind us again—that they are.
eralized other apply in the examples discussed in the article?
spoken about the ca
Though it may seem unlikely, many famous, beautiful, or tal- the fact that magazin
ented people suffer from negative self-concepts. Kate Winslet unfavorably on her b
has admitted that before going off to a movie shoot, she some- that Ryan Gosling sh
times thinks, “I’m a fraud, and they’re going to fire me … I’m As these examp
fat; I’m ugly …” (Eby, 2009). When Bradley Cooper was named no guarantee that in
the “Sexiest Man Alive” in People Magazine in 2011, even he who they are.
did not seem to think that he was sexy. He said he felt that as SOURCE: Eby, D. (2009,
h h i ll h f d hi i
• Reflection questions, placed in the margins at strategic Twins often go to great lengths to assure
intervals, encourage students to reflect on how major people they are not the same.
Pearson MediaShare between you and the student, peer groups for review-
ing, or as collaborative group assignments.
Pearson’s comprehensive media upload tool allows students
to post video, images, audio, or documents for instructor • Record video directly from a tablet, phone, or other
and peer viewing, time-stamped commenting, and assess- webcam (including a batch upload option for instruc-
ment. MediaShare is an easy, mobile way for students and tors) and tag submissions to a specific student or
professors to interact and engage with speeches, presenta- assignment.
tion aids, group projects, and other files. MediaShare gives • Embed video from YouTube via assignments to incorpo-
professors the tools to provide contextual feedback to rate current events into the classroom experience.
demonstrate how students can improve their skills. • Set up quiz questions on video assignments to ensure
Structured like a social networking site, MediaShare students master concepts and interact and engage with
helps promote a sense of community among students. In the media.
face-to-face and online course settings, MediaShare saves
• Import grades into most learning management
instructors valuable time and enriches the student learning
systems.
experience by providing contextual feedback.
• Ensure a secure learning environment for instructors
• Use MediaShare to assign or view speeches, outlines, and students through robust privacy settings.
presentation aids, video-based assignments, role plays,
• Upload videos, comment on submissions, and grade
group projects, and more in a variety of formats includ-
directly from our new MediaShare app, available
ing video, Word, PowerPoint, and Excel.
free from the iTunes store and GooglePlay; search for
• Assess students using customizable, Pearson-provided
Pearson MediaShare.
rubrics, or create your own around classroom goals,
learning outcomes, or department initiatives. Pearson MediaShare is available as a standalone product,
• Set up assignments for students with options for full- as part of MyCommunicationLab, or in a package with
class viewing and commenting, private comments REVEL.
A Word About Language
The text’s commitment to presenting comprehensive cov- Acknowledgments
erage of the complex field of communication carries with
We are once again grateful to all the students and instruc-
it a responsibility to use language thoughtfully. We rec-
tors who have provided invaluable feedback to us as we
ognize the fact that, for complex historical and political
wrote the four editions of Human Communication in Society.
relations, identity labels carry strong denotative mean-
Unfortunately we are unable to list here all of the students
ings that may vary from person to person and across time.
who participated, but we would like to acknowledge the
We have made an effort to use inclusive terms to represent
instructors who have helped to shape and define all edi-
the heterogeneity of opinions within various ethnic and
tions of our book.
racial groups.
For example, the term Hispanic was created and used
in 1980 by the U.S. government for the census and other reviewers (First edition)
purposes of collecting census statistics. However, many Bob Alexander: University of Louisiana–Monroe
individuals of Spanish descent prefer Latina/o, as do we. Isolde K. Anderson: Hope College
We endeavor to use the latter to refer to U.S. Americans Jay Baglia: San Jose State University
of Spanish descent from a specific ancestral nation like Cheryl L. Bailey: Western Illinois University
Argentina, Mexico, or any country in Latin America or Spain. John R. Baldwin: Illinois State University
We also use Mexican American when referring to individ- E. Tristan Booth: Arizona State University
uals coming more directly from Mexico, or Chicana/o to Joseph Bridges: Malone College
designate a more political consciousness among persons of Lynn S. Cockett: Juniata College
Mexican descent. Elisia L. Cohen: Saint Louis University
Similarly, we use the inclusive term Asian American Lisa Coutu: University of Washington
unless the context refers to individuals with a specific Peter A. DeCaro: California State University–Stanislaus
national origin (e.g., Japan or the Philippines). We use Aaron Dimock: University of Nebraska–Kearney
African American or Black interchangeably, recognizing Donald G. Ellis: University of Hartford
that some individuals (often those from the Caribbean) Larry A. Erbert: University of Texas at El Paso
prefer the more inclusive term Black, whereas others Marty Feeney: Central College
prefer African American. We also use Native American Charles Feldman: George Washington University
and American Indian interchangeably, recognizing that Sarah L. Bonewits Feldner: Marquette University
individuals are divided in their preferences for each of Karen A. Foss: University of New Mexico
these terms. Kenneth D. Frandsen: University of New Mexico
We should also note that we use both White (which John Gareis: University of Pittsburgh
emphasizes race) and European American (which empha- Sonja M. Brown Givens: University of Alabama
sizes ethnicity) to refer to U.S. Americans of European in Huntsville
ancestry. At the same time, we recognize that some indi- Carroll Glynn: Ohio State University
viduals prefer to emphasize their more specific origins Beryl S. Gutekunst: Chestnut Hill College
(Japanese American rather than Asian American, Yaqui Thomas Edward Harkins: New York University
rather than Native American, or German American rather Carla Harrell: Old Dominion University
than White). Brian L. Heisterkamp: California State University, San
Finally, we are learning to think more internationally Bernardino
in our use of language. Many of our neighbors in Latin and Dr. Patrick J. Hérbert: University of Louisiana–Monroe
South America, as well as in Canada, find it offensive when Christine Courtade Hirsch: State University of New York–
we use the term American to refer to ourselves. (After all, Oswego
these people are Americans as well.) Therefore, we prefer John Katsion: Hannibal-LaGrange College
the term U.S. American, in recognition of the fact that we are Joann Keyton: University of Kansas
only one society out of many that make up the continents of Larry J. King: Stephen F. Austin State University
North and South America. Thomas J. Knutson: California State University–Sacramento
xix
xx A Word About Language
Peter Lah: Saint Louis University Tema Milstein: University of New Mexico
William A. Lancaster: Northeastern University Shane Semmler: University of South Dakota
Sara McKinnon: Arizona State University Caitlin Wills-Toker: University of Georgia
Jennifer Mease: Arizona State University
Diane Millette: University of Miami reviewers (Fourth edition)
Todd Norton: University of Utah Becki Bowman: McPherson College
Shirley Oakley: Coastal Georgia Community College Kari Duffy: Carthage College
Richard K. Olsen, Jr: University of North Carolina– Mary Horner: St. Louis Community College
Wilmington Gilberto Martinez: Texas A&M International University
Karen Otto: Florida Community College at Jacksonville– Kerry Osborne: College of the Canyons
North Campus Leonard Schulze: Carthage College
Frank G. Pérez: University of Texas at El Paso Carl Thameling: University of Louisiana–Monroe
Linda Pledger: University of Arkansas–Little Rock
Steven B. Pratt: University of Central Oklahoma
Leanne Stuart Pupchek: Queens University of Charlotte
Additional Acknowledgments
John C. Reinard: California State University–Fullerton We would also like to thank our colleagues and students
Brian Reynolds: State University of New York–Buffalo for their invaluable assistance and moral support: a special
Scott J. Robson: Washburn University thanks to Professor Pauline Cheong for providing founda-
Pamela Schultz: Alfred University tional ideas for our revised chapter on computer-mediated
David Schulz: California State University–Stanislaus communication, Professor Clark Olson who generously
Kristina Horn Sheeler: Indiana University Purdue contributed his knowledge on small-group communication,
University Indianapolis Professor Karen Ashcraft (University of Utah) for her sub-
Deborah Shelley: University of Houston–Downtown stantial assistance with the organizational communication
Nancy J. Street: Texas A&M University chapter, and Professor Angela Trethewey for her support
Crispin Thurlow: University of Washington and help throughout this project.
Sarah Tracy: Arizona State University And, of course, we need to thank the many, many stu-
April Trees: University of Colorado, Boulder dents, both at Arizona State University and elsewhere, who
Kathleen J. Turner: Davidson College have good-naturedly provided invaluable feedback on the
Kyle Tusing: University of Arizona first, second and third editions, and helping us to make the
Sam Wallace: University of Dayton necessary changes in the fourth edition.
Toni S. Whitfield: James Madison University Thanks also to our editorial assistants, Tzu-Chiao Chen,
Bill Yousman: University of Hartford Casey Leier, and Thomas Miller, who spent hours searching
for (and finding) the most recent and relevant research articles.
reviewers (Second edition) They also successfully persuaded graduate student instruc-
Marcia S. Berry: Azusa Pacific University tors and their students to provide us with updated examples
Lynn S. Cockett: Juniata College and contemporary margin material. We especially appreciate
Larry A. Erbert: University of Colorado–Denver their assistance given that they had their own work to do.
Emma K. Gray: Portland Community College Thanks to the team at Pearson who made it all hap-
Carla J. Harrell: Old Dominion University pen. Thanks to our Publisher, Karon Bowers. We could
Christine Courtade Hirsch: SUNY Oswego not have managed without Pearson’s expertise, patience,
Heather A. Howley: Cazenovia College and practiced hand guiding us through a rather compli-
Thomas J. Knutson: Sacramento State University cated publishing process. Thanks also to Laura Town,
Joanna Kostides: Holyoke Community College development editor, for her enthusiasm and hard work.
Tema Milstein: University of New Mexico We want to acknowledge the work of program manager
Cynthia Ridle: Western Illinois University Anne Riciglano and project managers Raegan Hereema at
Renee Beth Stahle: Aquinas College Pearson and Chakira Lane at Integra-Chicago, who kept us
Jenny Warren: Collin College on track. Thanks, too, to our senior field marketing man-
ager Blair Tuckman, product marketing manager Becky
reviewers (third edition) Rowland, editorial assistant Kieran Fleming, and director
Erin Baird: University of Oklahoma of development Sharon Geary.
Anthony Hurst: California State University–San Marcos Finally, to our partners—James LeRoy, David Karbonski,
Vicki L. Karns: Suffolk University and Ronald Chaldu—who continue to tolerate our frequent
Dan Lair: University of Denver absences with good grace. We give them our deepest thanks
Valerie L. Manusov: University of Washington for their support throughout this and many other projects.
About the Authors
Jess Alberts is President’s Professor in the Hugh Downs School of Human Communica-
tion at Arizona State University. She is an interpretive scholar who focuses on interpersonal
communication and specializes in the study of conflict. Thomas Nakayama is a professor
in the Department of Communication Studies at Northeastern University. He is a critical
scholar who focuses on rhetoric and intercultural communication. Judith Martin is a pro-
fessor in the Hugh Downs School of Human Communication at Arizona State University.
She is a social scientist whose expertise is in intercultural communication.
xxi
This page intentionally left blank
Part I UnderstandIng HUman CommUnICatIon
ProCesses
Chapter 1
Introduction to Human
Communication
1
2 Part I Understanding Human Communication Processes
“If good communication skills were just common sense, then communication would not
so often go awry.”
On her way to class, Charee called her dad to let him know what time she would arrive home;
she then texted a friend to arrange to meet for lunch. While she waited for class to begin, she
checked Facebook and Tumblr. When the professor arrived, she muted her phone and listened as
the class began.
Most people, like Charee, exist in a sea of communication. They phone, email, and text
message their friends and family; spend time on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter;
occasionally watch television; attend class lectures; and are inundated by media
images as they shop for groceries or use public transportation. Given all of this, it
is hard to imagine that just 25 years ago most communication occurred face to face,
on landlines, or through the U.S. mail. But in fact, throughout much of human his-
tory, individuals lived close to the people they knew. They conducted commerce and
maintained relationships primarily with the same small group of people throughout
their lives. Today, people maintain relationships with individuals thousands of miles
away, and they buy and sell products halfway around the globe on Amazon, eBay, and
countless retail sites. This instant and widespread access to the world has its benefits,
but it also has its costs.
With so many communication options, people need a wider range of communi-
cation knowledge and skills than ever before. Successful communicators must con-
verse effectively face to face; determine what messages to send via email or Twitter;
learn with whom it is appropriate to use text messaging; and absorb the norms and
etiquette surrounding the use of social media, such as whether to communicate
through a Facebook post or a private message. Becoming an effective communicator
involves both understanding the components and processes of communication and
putting them into practice. As you work in this course to improve your communi-
cation knowledge and skills, you may see positive changes in your relationships,
your career, your engagement in civic life, and even your identity. How many other
courses can claim all that?
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.