Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arak Dsa
Arak Dsa
Midterm Examination in
Data Science Analytics
SCORE
I. Provide the necessary requirement for each item. Complete the tables below by writing the
mean(M), standard deviation(SD), and Descriptive Interpretation(DI) for each scale item.
Interpret the results as well. One point for each correct M, SD, and DI. Refer to the rubric
below for the score of your results interpretation. DO NOT CHANGE THE FORMAT OF
THE TABLE
4 3 2 1
Excellent Proficient Average Novice
Content Demonstrates a Demonstrates an Demonstrates Demonstrates
thorough adequate awareness of the minimal
understanding of understanding of context and awareness of the
the context and the context and purpose of the context and
purpose of the purpose of the essay purpose of the
essay essay essay
Content Uses content that Uses content that Uses content that Uses appropriate
Development is appropriate explores the is appropriate and relevant
and relevant to ideas within the and relevant to content to
the main topic context of the the development develop the main
main topic and exploration idea in some
of the main topic parts of the
essay
Organization There is a There is an There is an The
specific pattern organizational organizational organizational
of an pattern that is pattern that is pattern is
introduction, clearly intermittently minimally
topic observable observable observed within
development in within the within the the
the body and a communication communication communication
well-defined of the essay of the essay of the essay
conclusion
Evidence There is a There is a There is an There is an
skillful use of consistent use of attempt to attempt to use
high quality and high quality and present high sources to
relevant sources relevant sources quality and support the ideas
in the in the relevant sources in the essay
development of development of in the
ideas within the ideas within the development of
context of the context of the ideas within the
topic topic context of the
topic
Mechanics Delivery is well- Delivery is Delivery is Delivery is not
done through the properly done understandable coherent and
use of excellent though there are but there are there is a large
grammar, minimal lapses some number of
appropriate word in grammar, grammatical grammatical
use and appropriate word lapses, lapses,
punctuation. use and inappropriate inappropriate
punctuation. word use and word use and
punctuation. punctuation
Page 1 of 2
Table 1
Page 2 of 2
Table 1 shows the mean, standard deviation, and descriptive interpretation of respondents' emotional
quotients (EQs) according to the eight EQ dimensions. The EQ dimensions are: Emotional literacy, Emotional
awareness of others, Emotional quotient competency, and Emotional values and attitudes. Table 1 represents
first dimension which is compose of 3 scales namely; Emotional Self-Awareness, Emotional Expression and
Emotional Awareness of Others
The table shows that respondents' EQs are generally moderate. The highest mean EQ scale is (M = 2.94,
SD = 0.78) I am aware of my feelings most of the time, followed by (M = 2.84, SD = 0.88) I let others know
what I want and need , (M = 2.84, SD = 0.77) I think about how others might feel before I give my opinion. The
lowest mean EQ scale is (M = 2.56, SD = 0.91) I let people know when uncomfortable feelings get in the way
of our work. In general, The first dimension had (M= 2.70, SD= 0.03)
According to the findings of this survey, respondents have a general awareness of their own emotions as
well as the emotions of others. They can also efficiently manage their emotions and form great relationships
with others. However, in terms of letting people know when uncomfortable feelings get in the way of their
work, there is space for development.
To support this findings, An Article Feel Your Feelings: How to Deal With Uncomfortable Emotions
(2020 ), This year has brought a lot of new difficulties and uncertainty into our lives. Along with it, we likely
have experienced a range of uncomfortable or negative emotions. Some of our emotions can be short-lived, like
a flash of annoyance, or more long term, like enduring sadness. When these feelings come up, we may
immediately want to either deny them or not acknowledge them at all. This is a psychological defense that we
use to protect ourselves and block out any anticipated pain. However, we do more harm to ourselves by not
fully processing our feelings and it isn’t a productive way to cope. That’s why it’s still important to work
through and deal with uncomfortable emotions. So why do we have such an issue with confronting our
emotions? A lot of it can be attributed to a larger cultural problem. We live in a culture that traditionally resists
and fears emotions. Additionally, there is an often negative view towards those who are vulnerable and express
how they feel because it is perpetuated as “being weak” or “too sensitive.” However, those harmful claims are
not true. Feeling our feelings and owning our emotions is one of the strongest things we can do.
Reference/s:
Feel Your Feelings: How to Deal With Uncomfortable Emotions Eugene Therapy
https://eugenetherapy.com › Blog
Table 2 shows the mean, standard deviation, and descriptive interpretation of respondents' emotional
quotients (EQs) according to the eight EQ dimensions. The EQ dimensions are: Emotional literacy, Emotional
awareness of others, Emotional quotient competency, and Emotional values and attitudes. Table represents
second dimension which is compose of 5 scales namely; Intentionality, Creativity, Resilience, Interpersonal
Connections and Constructive Discontent.
The table shows that respondents' EQs are generally low to moderate. The highest mean EQ scale is (M
= 2.96, SD = 0.89) I remain calm even in a situation when others get angry, followed by (M = 2.90, SD = 0.84)
I find it easy to wait patiently when I need to, (M = 2.89, SD = 0.79) There is always more than one right
answer. The lowest mean EQ scale is (M = 2.50, SD = 0.94) I decide certain problems are not worth worrying
about. In general, The second dimension had (M= 2.70, SD= 0.31)
According to the findings of this study, respondents had a solid awareness of their Emotional Quotient
Competency in terms of Intentionality, Creativity, Resilience, Interpersonal Connections, and Constructive
Discontent. Avoiding confrontations , on the other hand has room for progress.
According to a study, These prevalent personality characteristics must be considered when attempting to
address stress issues with pilots. Communicating the relevant facts without excessive reliance on psychological
terms may be beneficial in countering prevailing attitudes of invulnerability, denial, and defensiveness. Survey
research has indicated that pilots harbor a dislike for a psycho therapeutic approach to problem-solving (Byrnes
and Black, 1993).The cognitive behavioral approach to manage stress over psychodynamic approaches, perhaps
because of the problem-oriented logic inherent in cognitive behavioral precepts (Banken and Mahone, 1991:
Aifken et al., 1971). In this way, stress management interventions would be mission-relevant. This could
theoretically help to reduce resistances and increase the direct relevance of efforts to operational
readiness. The present study constitutes the initial step in this direction.
Reference/s:
Assessment of Aircrew Stress.
Defense Technical Information Center (.mil)
https://apps.dtic.mil › sti › pdf › ADA331652 PDF
by LC Katz · 1997 · Cited by 4
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA331652.pdf
Table 3 shows the mean, standard deviation, and descriptive interpretation of respondents'
emotional quotients (EQs) according to the eight EQ dimensions. The EQ dimensions are: Emotional literacy,
Emotional awareness of others, Emotional quotient competency, and Emotional values and attitudes. Table 3
represents third dimension which is compose of 6 scales namely; Compassion, Outlook, Intuition, Trust
Radius, Personal Power and Integrity.
The table shows that respondents' EQs are generally low to moderate. The highest mean EQ scale is
(M= 3.07, SD= 0.73) I need recognition from others to make my work worthwhile, followed by (M = 2.96, SD
Page 6 of 2
= 0.88) I know what I want and go after it, (M = 2.93, SD = 0.80) I am willing to admit it when I make a
mistake. The lowest mean EQ scale is (M = 2.41, SD = 0.99) If I reflect on my life, I might find I am basically
happy. In general, The third dimension had (M= 0.21, SD= 2.75)
The results of this study suggest that respondents have a generally good understanding of their
Emotional Values and Attitudes in terms of Compassion, Outlook, Intuition, Trust Radius, Personal Power and
Integrity. However, there is room for improvement in terms of find yourself going along with a situation even if
you know you don't believe in it.
According to a research: Happiness begins with you; it is a state of mind, therefore if you think and want
to be happy, you will be! It really is that simple, yet 95% of us will never know how to achieve happiness in its
simplest form. How to be happy is without a doubt the most of second most asked question in life after what is
the meaning of life. After all, isn’t happiness what we are all looking for? Of course what is the meaning of life
is very important but knowing your purpose may not make you happy. Understanding how to be happy seems a
little bit more important to me than my purpose in life. Unless being happy is your ultimate purpose in life. You
may never find your purpose in life but finding or knowing how to be happy can make all the difference in this
world.
Reference/s:
https://medium.com/publishous/how-being-happy-24-7-altered-my-life-and-made-me-feel-worthy-
again-c5cbee669bf5
Prepared:
Associate Professor NANCY G. DE LEON, DME
Page 7 of 2