Approved Complete Plan

Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry
Solid Waste
Management District
Plan Update
Planning Period 2015 to 2024
Approved Plan
March 31, 2015
Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry
Solid Waste Management District
675 Price Road
Newark, OH 43055
Phone: 740-349-6308
Fax: 740-349-6309
E-mail: cflpswd@windstream.net
CFLP Waste Management District Plan Update 2014
Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District Plan Update

Table of Contents
I. Introduction I-1
A. Plan Approval Date, Counties in District, and Planning Period Length I-1
B. Reasons for Plan Submittal I-1
C. Process to Determine Material Change in Circumstances I-1
D. District Formation and Certification Statement I-2
E. CFLP District Policy Committee Members I-3
F. Board of Directors I-4
G. District Contact, Address and Phone Number I-5
H. Committees Involved in Plan Preparation I-5
II. Executive Summary II-1
III. Inventories III-1

A. The Reference Year III-1
B. Existing Solid Waste Landfills III-1
C. Existing Incinerators and Resource Recovery Facilities III-1
D. Existing Transfer Facilities III-1
E. Existing Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste Collection Activities III-2
F. Existing Composting/Yard Waste Management Facilities and Programs III-2
G. Existing Open Dumps and Waste Tire Dumps III-2
H. Ash, Foundry Sand, and Slag Disposal Sites III-3
I. Map of Facilities and Sites III-3
J. Existing Collection Systems - Waste Haulers III-3
IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction IV-1
A. Reference Year Population and Residential/Commercial Waste Generation IV-1
B. Industrial Waste Generation IV-3
C. Exempt Waste IV-6
D. Total Waste Generation IV-6
E. Reference Year Waste Reduction IV-7
F. Total Waste Generation: Historical Trends of Disposal Plus Waste Reduction IV-10
G. Reconciliation of Waste Generation IV-11
H. Waste Composition Analysis IV-11
V. Planning Period Projections and Strategies V-1

A. Planning Period V-1
B. Population Projections V-1
C. Waste Generation Projections V-2
D. Projections for Waste Stream Composition V-5
E. Waste Reduction Strategies through the Planning Period V-5
Contents 1
VI. Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used VI-1

A. District Methods for Management of Solid Waste VI-1
B. Demonstration of Access to Capacity VI-3
C. Schedule of Facilities and Programs: New, Expansions, Closures, VI-9
Continuations
D. Identification of Facilities VI-25
E. Authorization Statement to Designate Facilities VI-25
F. Waiver Process for Undesignated Facilities VI-25
G. Siting Strategy for Facilities VI-26
H. Contingencies for Capacity Assurance and District Program Implementation VI-26
VII. Measurement of Progress Towards Waste Reduction Goals VII-1

A. District Will Comply with Goal VII-1
B. Demonstration of Compliance with Goal #1 VII-1
C. Calculating Goal #2, the Waste Reduction Rate (WRR) VII-13
VIII. Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation VIII-1

A. Funding Mechanisms and Amount of Money Generated VIII-1
B. Costs of Plan Implementation VIII-4
C. Funds Allocated from ORC 3734.57(B) and OEC 3734.573 VIII-13
D. Summary of Costs and Revenues VIII-14
IX. District Rules IX-1

A. Existing Rules IX-1
B. Proposed Rules IX-1
C. Procedures IX-1
X. Appendices
Appendix A District Formation Agreement

Appendix B Copies of Public Notices for Public Hearing and Public Comment Period
Appendix C Copy of Resolutions and Certification Statements Documenting
Ratification
Appendix D Identification of Consultants Retained for Plan Preparation
Appendix E District Maps
Appendix F Information Related to Collection and Compiling of Recycling Data
Appendix G Waste Reduction and Recycling Programs Used by the District in 2012
Appendix H Solid Waste Tonnage on Which District Fees Were Paid 2009-2013
Appendix I Existing District Rules and Review of Role of Rules in Implementing the
District Plan
Contents 2
Table of Tables
I. Introduction
No tables.
II. Executive Summary

Table ES -1 General Information II-1
Table ES -2 District Contact/Office II-1
Table ES -3 Plan Data Summary II-4
Table ES -4 Existing Disposal Facilities II-5
Table ES -5 District Budget Summary II-6
III. Inventories
Table III-1 2012 District Waste Taken Directly to Landfills III-4
Table III-2 Solid Waste Incinerators & Treatment Facilities Used by the III-5
District
Table III-3 2012 District Waste Flow through Transfer Facilities III-6
Table III-4 Curbside Recycling Opportunities in District in 2012 III-8
Table III-5A CFLP Recycling Opportunities-County Managed Drop-offs III-12
Table III-5B Special Collection Events and Litter Collection in 2012 III-16
Table III-5C Government offices and Public Schools III-17
Table III-5D Private Recyclers, Scrapyards, MRF's, End Use Industries III-18
Table III-6 Composting Facilities Used by the District III-38
Table III-7 Omitted – Facilities Used by District Which Are Located Outside
Ohio: Additional Data
Table III-8 Open Dumps and Waste Tire Dumps III-40
Table III-9 Foundry Sand and Slag Disposal Sites Used by District III-41
Table III-10 Solid Waste Haulers operating in the District III-42
IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction

Table IV-1 Reference Year Population IV-2
Table IV-2 Reference Year Residential/Commercial Generation Using IV-3
Actual Disposal and Reported Recycling
Table IV-3A Industrial Generation Based on Actual Disposal and Recycling IV-4
Table IV-3B Industrial Generation Based on Actual Disposal and Recycling IV-4
Exclusive of FGD Material from the AEP Conesville Power Plant
Table IV-3C Industrial Generation Survey Respondents vs Non-Respondents IV-5
Table IV-4 Exempt Waste Generated in District IV-6
Table IV-5 Reference Year Total Waste Generation IV-6
Table IV-6 Reference Year Residential/Commercial Waste Reduction in IV-9
the District
Table IV-7 Reference Year Industrial Waste Reduction in the District – IV-10
Reported by Material Type
Table IV-8 Total Waste Generation Based Upon Disposal Plus Waste IV-11
Recycled/Reduced
Contents 3
Table IV-9 Adjusted Reference Year Total District Waste Generation for the IV-11
District
Table IV-10 Estimated Residential/Commercial Waste Stream Composition IV-12
in Reference Year
Table IV-11 Estimated Industrial Waste Composition for the Reference Year IV-13
V. Planning Period Projections and Strategies

Table V-1 District Population Projections V-2
Table V-2 District Residential/Commercial Waste Generation Projections V-3
Table V-3 Projected Industrial Waste Generation V-4
Table V-4 Total Waste Generation for District During Planning Period V-5
Table V-5 Residential/Commercial Waste Reduction Strategies V-26
Table V-6 Industrial Waste Reduction Strategies V-27
VI. Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used

Table VI-1 Waste Management Methods Used and Processing Capacity VI-1
Needed for Each Year of Planning Period
Table VI-2 Summary of Residential/Commercial Waste Management VI-2
Methods
Table VI-3 Summary of Industrial Waste Management Methods VI-2
Table VI-4A Landfills that Accepted District Waste in Reference Year VI-6
Table VI-4B Waste Management Method: Landfill-Possible Scenario for VI-7
Placement
Table VI-4C Waste Management Method: Yard Waste Composting and VI-8
Recycling Facilities & Services
Table VI-4D Omitted - Waste Management Method: Transfer Facilities
Table VI-5 Implementation Schedule for Facilities, Strategies, Programs, VI-10
and Activities
VII. Measurement of Progress Toward Waste Reduction Goals

Table VII-1 Materials Designated to Demonstrate Compliance with Goal #1 VII-2
Table VII-2 Calculation of Access for Residential Sector VII-5
Table VII-2A Commercial Recycling Access VII-12
Table VII-3 Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Residential and Commercial VII-16
Table VII-4A Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Industrial VII-17
Table VII-4B Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Industrial without FGD Waste VII-18
Stream
Table VII-5A Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Total District Solid Waste VII-19
Table VII-5B Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Total District Solid Waste- VII-20
Excluding FGD Waste Stream
VIII. Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation

Table VIII-1 District Disposal Fee Schedule and Revenues Generated VIII-2
Table VIII-2 Generation Fee Schedule and Revenues VIII-3
Contents 4
Table VIII-3 Summary of Revenue Generated and Mechanisms Used VIII-4

Table VIII-4 Omitted - Debt Schedule
Table VIII-5 Cost of Plan Implementation VIII-12
Table VIII-6 Fund Allocations as Required by ORC VIII-14
Table VIII-7 Omitted-Contingent Funding Sources Planned
Table VIII-8 Summary of District Revenues and Expenditures VIII-15
Contents 5
CFLP District Solid Waste Management Plan Update 2014
I. Introduction
The name of this District is the Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District. In this Plan, it will
be referred to as the CFLP District or the District.
A. Plan Approval Date, Counties in the District and Planning Period Length
1. Under the approved Plan:
The date of Ohio EPA approval was July 26, 2010.

The counties in the District are Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Counties.
The planning period was fifteen years.
2. Plan to be implemented with the approval of this document:
The counties in the District are Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry.
The planning period is ten years.
The first year of the planning period is January 2015. The last year is 2024. An additional year,
2025, has been added so that the planning period will include ten years even if implementation
is not started until 2016.
B. Reason for Plan Submittal
This plan is the mandatory five-year plan update.
C. Process to Determine Material Change in Circumstances
The CFLP District will use its normal operational procedures to monitor plan implementation and
determine whether and when a material change in circumstances has occurred in the District which
requires a plan amendment. The District’s Board of Directors meets at least quarterly, and the Policy
Committee reviews the implementation of the District Plan annually and meets as needed to monitor
implementation.
1. Circumstances which may result in a material change include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Reduction in the available capacity of the publicly-available landfills used for disposal of solid
waste generated in the district such that total available daily disposal capacity of those landfills
is less than 150% of the average daily amount of solid waste generated in the District that is
disposed of in landfills.
• Changes in strategies for waste reduction or recycling that result in the District failing to provide
the mandatory waste reduction or recycling programs and activities that are required by the
implementation schedule that is included in this plan (except additions to or expansions of
existing programs or a decision to reduce the frequency or scope of programs upon review by
the Policy Committee as described in Chapter VIII).
I-1
• Inadequate funding to maintain District programs that are required by this plan. The District will
examine whether or not there is a material change if either of the following occurs: two
consecutive years in which annual revenues total less than 90% of the revenue projected in this
plan or annual expenditures are more than 110% of the expenditures projected in the plan. If
there are offsetting changes in revenues or expenditures so that the District can continue to
fully implement all of the programs required by this plan, the District may find that there has not
been a material change.
• Delay of more than one year in the implementation of programs and/or activities that are
required parts of this plan’s implementation schedule (unless the programs have been reduced
in frequency or eliminated upon review by the Policy Committee as provided in Chapter VIII).
• Changes in waste generation could trigger a material change in circumstances if the change is
such that additional disposal results in a reduction in available landfill capacity or unanticipated
decreased disposal results in revenue reductions. Both of these situations are specifically
addressed above.
2. Procedure and timetable to address a material change.
The Policy Committee, District Staff or member of the District Board of Directors will notify the
Chairperson of the Board of Directors of any reliable information that is likely to establish that a
material change in circumstances addressed in the District’s approved Plan may have occurred.
The Board will place an item on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled meeting or
schedule a special meeting as appropriate. The District Board of Directors will make a
determination on whether to request a plan amendment be prepared by the Policy Committee
within 120 days after the matter is first placed on its agenda. If a recommendation for a plan
amendment is adopted, the Board of Directors will notify the Director of the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency. The Policy Committee, with the assistance of any standing or special
committees, as appropriate, will prepare the plan amendment to address the material change
of circumstances. The schedule for development of the plan amendment, approval, ratification,
and implementation, will be established by the Policy Committee, depending upon the extent of
the amendment required to address the change in circumstances. For example, an
amendment which only affects elements of the plan required by Section 3734.5 (B) or (E) of the
Revised Code will not require approval of the Director of Ohio EPA, and may be processed in a
much shorter time than other types of plan amendments.
D. District Formation and Certification Statement
1. District formation:
Appendix A contains the original resolutions to form the District. There have been
no changes in composition since then.
2. Public notice:
Copies of the public notices and notices of hearings regarding the ratification of
I-2
this plan will be placed in Appendix B.
3. Certification and adoption statements:
The certification statement for the draft plan must be approved and signed by the
Policy Committee members prior to submitting the plan to the Ohio EPA for non-
binding review. The certification statement is included in Appendix C. Appendix C
will contain other resolutions of the Policy Committee adopting the revised plan
and certifying that the plan has been ratified in accordance with Ohio Law.
E. CFLP District Policy Committee Members
As of June, 2014, the Chairperson of the Policy Committee is Mike Kiger and the members of the
Policy Committee are:
Coshocton County Representatives
County Government Representative Gary Fischer, Coshocton County Commissioner
Municipal Government Representative Mark Frank, City of Coshocton
Township Representative Curtis Lee, Township Trustee
Health Department Representative Steve Lonsinger, Coshocton County Environmental Director
Industrial Representative Joe Bulzan, Rock Tenn CP, LLC
Citizen Representative Glenn Hill
Public Representative Jeff Wherley, Coshocton County Recycling and Litter Prevention
Fairfield County Representatives
County Government Representative Mike Kiger, Fairfield County Commissioner
Municipal Government Representative Paul Martin, City of Lancaster
Township Representative Terry Dunlap, Township Trustee
Health Department Representative Larry Hanna, Acting Fairfield County Health Commissioner
Industrial Representative Tony Furgiuele, U.S.T. Environmental Contractor, Inc.
Citizen Representative Patty Bratton, Lancaster/Fairfield County Community Action
Public Representative Tony Vogel, Fairfield County Sanitary Engineer
I-3
Licking County Representatives
County Government Representative Tim Bubb, Licking County Commissioner
Municipal Government Representative Jeff Hall, City of Newark
Township Representative Dave Lang, Township Trustee
Health Department Representative Chad Brown, Licking County Environmental Health Director
Industrial Representative Robin Bennett, Owens-Corning, Inc.
Citizen Representative Lynn Hatfield, SBC Recycling
Public Representative Seth Ellington, Waste Away
Perry County Representatives
County Government Representative Jim O'Brien, Perry County Commissioner
Municipal Government Representative Scott Bryant, City of New Lexington
Township Representative Richard Fankhauser, Township Trustee
Health Department Representative Angela DeRolph, Perry County Health Commissioner
Industrial Representative Howard Orringer, Cooper Standard
Citizen representative Lucinda Yinger, T.C.C.I. Labs
Public Representative Matt Reed, Perry County Recycling Office
District At-Large Representative Jim Hart
F. Board of Directors (As of May 2014)
Coshocton County Commissioners Licking County Commissioners
Gary Fischer Tim Bubb
Curtis Lee Duane Flowers
Dane Shryock Doug Smith
I-4
Fairfield County Commissioners Perry County Commissioners
Steve Davis David Freriks
Mike Kiger Ed Keister
David Levacy James O'Brien
The Chairperson of the Board of Directors is Gary Fischer.
G. District Contact, Address, and Phone Number
Carol Philipps, Executive Director

675 Price Road
Newark, OH 43055
Phone: 740-349-6308
Fax: 740-349-6309
E-mail: cflpswd@windstream.net
H. Committees Involved in Plan Preparation
As part of the planning process, the Policy Committee formed sub-committees to review and make
recommendations about District programs to be included in the plan. Subcommittee participation was
not limited to Policy Committee members, giving the general public an opportunity to actively participate
in plan update. The sub-committees and the issues they worked on were as follow:
The Solid Waste Disposal Sub-Committee reviewed and made recommendations regarding the status
of available capacity at disposal facilities used by the District, District rules addressing waste disposal
and the siting of disposal facilities, the enforcement of waste disposal and anti-littering laws, and the
role of the District in clean-up of illegal dump sites.
The Residential Recycling Sub-Committee assisted in developing the inventory of residential recycling
opportunities. The Sub-Committee reviewed and made recommendations regarding future recycling
infrastructure needs, the accessibility of recycling opportunities for residential waste generators, and the
appropriate level of funding from the District.
The Business/Industrial Waste Reduction and Recycling Sub-Committee evaluated the effectiveness of
the existing District programs to interface with businesses and industries and assist them in reducing
waste and increasing recycling and made recommendations for updates of District programs.
Education and Outreach Sub-Committee reviewed existing public and youth education programs and
made recommendations regarding programs to be implemented to effectively promote increases in
waste reduction and recycling for residents and businesses and to continue the education of youth in
responsible waste management.
I-5
The Special Waste Management Sub-Committee reviewed the programs to manage special waste and
made recommendations regarding the role that the District will play in helping residents manage
household hazardous waste and hard to manage wastes such as appliances, electronics, tires, and yard
waste.
The Finance Sub-Committee reviewed historic and future projections of revenue and expenses for the
District and prepared a budget for the planning period using program expense projections prepared by
the program sub-committees. The sub-committee made recommendations to the Policy Committee as to
the appropriate level of revenue and expenditures required to implement planned programs for the
entire planning period including possible contingencies for unexpected changes in revenue or expense.
I-6
II. Executive Summary
Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste Management District Plan Update
Table ES-1 General Information
District name: Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District (referred to in this plan as the
District or CFLP.)
District ID # Planning period: January 1,
Reference year: 2012
(for OEPA use only) 2015 to December 31, 2024
D RD DR Approval date: OI date: DA
Key: D=draft, RD=ratified draft, DR=draft revised, OI=order to be implemented, DA=draft amended.
This is the draft CFLP Joint Solid Waste Management District Plan Update for OEPA review and non-
binding opinion.
Table ES-2 District Contact/Office
Contact: Carol Philipps, Executive Director

Address: 675 Price Road
City: Newark State: Ohio Zip:43055
Email:
Phone: 740-349-6308 Fax: 740-349-6309
cflpswd@windstream.net
Overview of the Plan Update Process
This plan is the five year update of a plan which was approved by the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency July 26, 2010. This plan is being submitted to the Ohio EPA for an advisory review. Following
the review by Ohio EPA, revisions will be made to respond to OEPA’s comments. The revised plan
will be available for a thirty-day public review and comment period. Following the public comment
period, public hearings will be held to give interested parties and the public an opportunity to ask
questions and make comments regarding the plan.
The Policy Committee will approve the revised plan to be delivered to the each municipality and
township in the district for review and ratification. During the 90-day ratification period, each county
and political subdivision within the four counties will vote on the plan by means of a resolution or
ordinance. When ratified, the plan will be sent to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for final
review and approval.
Layout of This Plan Following the Format specified by the Ohio EPA, the plan begins by choosing a
reference year. This is the year for which we gather data about the population, disposal, recycling,
and other solid waste management activities, creating the foundation on which to build future solid
waste management plans. Our reference year is 2012.
Chapter One - Introduction
This section describes the legal organization of the District and the individuals involved with the
Plan. The CFLP District is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of the commissioners of each
II-1
county. Planning is accomplished through a Policy Committee comprised of representatives of seven

sectors from each member county - county, municipality, township, health department, industry,
citizen and public. Per Ohio statute, a District-at-large member is added to avoid tie votes.
Chapter Two - Executive Summary
This is the section you are reading. It contains an overview of the entire Plan.
Chapter Three - Reference Year Inventories
This section contains the baseline data for the reference year 2012. Tables list all disposal and
transfer facilities, incinerators, recycling activities, open dumps, and haulers used by the District. To
make this information as relevant as possible, the lists contain notes about changes that have taken
place since 2012. A detailed narrative about recycling programs is contained in Appendix G.
Chapter Four - Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, Disposal and Recycling
This chapter begins with the number of people living in the District. Using the 2010 federal census
as a starting point, and projections of growth from the Ohio Development Services Agency, the total
population of the District in 2012 was 372,936.
From that, we calculate the waste we generated by adding the number of tons disposed to the
number of tons reported as recycled. In 2012, the residential/commercial waste generation in the
CFLP District was 395,109 tons which is 5.81 pounds per person per day. Industrial waste
generation in 2012 was 1,404,941 tons based on actual disposal (767,408) plus recycling reported
by industries (637,523).
Chapter Five - Planning Period Projections and Strategies
We begin this chapter by projecting the population of the District through the year 2024, when it is
expected to reach 417,273 people. This Plan projects a very modest growth of .1% per year in
residential/commercial waste generation and 2% per year in the industrial waste generation over the
next ten years.
According to the facility data reports filed at Ohio EPA, the total amount of waste landfilled from the
CFLP District in 2012 was 1,428,377 tons. This plan does not predict significant growth in waste
generation and in disposal needs during the planning period. There are three publicly available
landfills in the District and a number of landfills within a reasonable hauling distance from the
District.
Chapter Six - Methods of Management, Facilities and Programs to be Used
Using the projections from the previous chapter, we demonstrate in this chapter that there will be
adequate facilities and programs to recycle our waste and dispose what cannot be recycled during
the planning period. The public landfills that are within the district have an authorized maximum
daily waste receipt limit of 18,000 tons. Based on 260 disposal days per year, the average daily
need at publicly available landfills in 2012 was 1,649 tons. It will remain about the same throughout
the planning period. The existing landfills in the district have ample capacity to take all of the
District’s waste for the entire planning period. Recycling strategies will build upon existing programs
II-2
to increase the diversion of materials from landfills and improve the cost efficiency of District-funded
activities.
Chapter Seven - Measurement of Progress Toward Waste Reduction Goals
The 2009 Solid State Solid Waste Management Plan encourages Districts to implement programs
which will lead to a 25% waste reduction rate for the residential/commercial sector, and a 66%
waste reduction rate for the industrial sector. In 2012, the CFLP District recycled 29% of the
residential and commercial waste and 45% of the industrial waste. The District met the
residential/commercial requirements of Goal #2, but did not meet the industrial requirements.
Therefore, this Plan pursues Goal #1, which is to provide access to recycling opportunities for at
least 90% of the district population. Recycling opportunities that qualify to demonstrate access are
defined as drop-off recycling, non-subscription curbside, subscription curbside, centralized material
recovery facilities, or a combination of these. A formula is provided to determine how much credit
each type of recycling is assigned toward reaching the 90% access goal. The population with access
as calculated using the formula at the end of 2012 was 110% in Coshocton County, 78% in Fairfield
County, 94% in Licking County and 171% in Perry County. Note: changes in the number of locations
since the reference year have brought Fairfield County up to 87% access.
This Plan counts on the continuation of most of the existing curbside recycling programs and the
continued operation of the existing multi-material drop-off sites. Several new sites have been added
since the reference year. All four counties will maintain 90% or above access during the planning
period.
To meet the goals of the 2009 state plan, the District’s recycling and offices focus on changing
behavior to decrease waste and increase recycling. Each county office shall continue to provide
education, outreach, marketing, and technical assistance regarding reduction, recycling,
composting, reuse, and other alternative waste management methods to identify target audiences
using best management practices.
Chapter Eight - Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation
The District will continue to utilize a disposal fee for the entire planning period. At the present time
the District disposal fee is $1.25 per ton for in-district (Tier I) and out-of-state (Tier III) wastes, and
$3.50 per ton for out-of-district waste (Tier II). Beginning January 1, 2016, Tier 1 and Tier III fees will
be $2.00 per ton and Tier II fee will be $4.00 per ton. Disposal fees are collected at each publicly
available landfill located in the District and remitted monthly to the District. The fee is collected on
municipal solid waste which includes residential, commercial and industrial waste. The fee is not
collected on exempt waste or waste deposited in captive landfills.
The District will continue to utilize a generation fee for the entire planning period. At the present
time, the District generation fee is $2.00 per ton. Beginning January 1, 2016, the generation fee will
be $1.25 per ton. The generation fee is paid on each ton of municipal solid waste generated in the
District and delivered to an Ohio transfer facility or a publicly-available Ohio landfill for disposal. The
fee is collected on municipal solid waste which includes residential, commercial and industrial
waste. The fee is not collected on exempt waste or waste deposited in captive landfills.
Should state legislation change during this planning period rendering either of these fees incapable
of sustaining district programs, the District may choose to implement flow control and designate
facilities to receive our waste, requiring the collection of a fee in return.
II-3
Chapter Nine - Rules
A copy of the current rule 1.0, regarding public notice of meetings, is included in Appendix I.
After this updated plan has been approved by the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency, the CFLP Solid Waste Management District Board of Directors may, as the Board deems
appropriate, amend or rescind the existing rule and adopt, amend, or rescind rules to the fullest
extent authorized by Ohio Revised Code Section 343.01(G) and any other provision of Ohio law.
The Plan includes procedures for the adoption or amendment of District rules.
Table ES-3. Plan Data Summary
Plan Data: All of the waste generation, reduction, and recycling number are expressed in tons and are
rounded to the nearest whole ton.
Reference year
2019 (year 5) 2024 (year 10)
2012
Population from Table V-1 372,936 395,764 413,618
Industrial 1,404,941 1,495,162 1,572,608
Waste Generation Residential/commercial 395,109 405,873 426,307
(Table V-4 Exempt 26,807 26,807 26,807
Total 1,826,857 1,927,842 2,025,722
Industrial (Table VII-4) 637,523 617,425 606,991
Recycling Residential/commercial
91,213 115,454 139,952
(Table VII-3)
Res/Com Yard Waste
23,969 7,013 7,356
Composting (VII-3)
MSW Composting 0 0 0
Incineration 11 11 11
Ash disposal 0.5 0.5 0.5
Waste Reduction Total (Table VII-5)
In-district 1,304,334.03 1,184,376 1,274,120
District Waste
Landfill Disposal Out-of-district 30,705.72
(includes exempt
waste) Out-of-state 0
Landfill Disposal Total 1,335,039.75 1,184,375.59 1,274,119.92

WWR=percentage of waste reduction=waste
reduction/recycling divided by waste
40% 38% 37%
generation (exempt waste is included - Table
VII-5)
Note: In-district and out-of-district landfilling is combined for 2019 and 2024 because the District does
not direct waste, and so there is no way to accurately predict how much will be landfilled in-district and
how much will be transported out.
II-4
Table ES- 4 Disposal Facilities Used by the District in Reference Year

Expected Useful Life
Amount of District
Waste Landfilled
Facilities Used by District AMDWRL Years in 2012
In-District Facilities
Coshocton Landfill, Inc. 1
(Coshocton County) 500 168.5 35,597.40

Pine Grove Regional Facility
Landfill (Fairfield Co.) 5,000 55.7 105,165.00
Suburban South R & D Facility
(Perry Co.) 5,000 48.5 104,094.38
AEP Conesville Residual Waste

Landfill (Captive Landfill in
Coshocton Co.) NA 6.0 999,770.00
Owens Corning Landfill (Captive
Landfill in Licking Co.) NA 127.0 16,003.00
Tunnell Hill (Perry County) 8,000 34.3 98,044.24

Out-of-District Facilities
Beech Hollow Landfill (Jackson
Co.) 4,000 61.0 37,618.12
Kimble Sanitary Landfill
(Tuscarawas Co.) 10,000 50.5 20,378.00
Athens Hocking Reclamation
Center (Athens Co.) 2,500 72.0 8,821.65
American LF (Stark County) 15,000 68.8 1,265.82
Noble Road Landfill 4,000 14.9 1,158.08
Apex Landfill 7,500 5.5 120.52
Carbon Limestone 11000 20.1 64.86
Pike County Landfill (Pike CO.) 2,000 88.0 29.11
SWACO Landfill (Franklin Co) 8000 25.3 226.14
Crawford Co. Landfill 1200 9.8 16.38
Evergreen Landfill 7500 31.1 0.39

Hancock Co Landfill 750 19.5 3.5
Total Landfilled 1,428,376.59
AMDWRL—Allowable maximum daily waste receipt limit.

Years left is the number of years remaining if waste is received at 2012 levels.
II-5
1. Coshocton Landfill was "mothballed" February 2014. It will remain permitted so that it can be
reopened at a point in the future that Waste Management determines it is needed for their business.
Table ES-5 District Budget Summary
2015 (first year) 2019 (fifth year) 2024 (tenth year)
Revenue (Table VIII-8) $ 2,069,937 $ 2,218,995 $ 2,160,000
Carry over from previous year

$ 5,090,593 $ 3,748,120 $ 1,493,977
(Table VIII-8)
Expenditures (Table VIII-8)

Programs to meet State Plan
Goals for recycling & waste $ 1,467,569 $ 1,866,458 $ 1,971,712
reduction
District administration $ 176,793 $ 189,872 $ 217,928
Optional activities $ 467,928 $ 538,082 $ 538,208
Final balance at end of year $ 5,048,240 $ 3,372,703 $ 926,129
Chapter VIII of this plan provides detailed information regarding the District’s anticipated
expenditures during the planning period. The majority of the District’s funds will be spent on
providing access to recycling opportunities for District residents and on education and technical
assistance programs to increase the amount of waste that is diverted from disposal through
recycling, waste reduction, and reuse.
II-6
III. Inventories [ORC Section 3734.53 (A) (1)-(4)]
To the extent possible, the tables in this section of the plan list the facilities and programs that were
available in the reference year, 2012. In order to make these tables as relevant as possible, they
also contain information about facilities and programs that were added, eliminated or changed since
2012.
A. The Reference Year
The reference year used for all of the inventories and projections in this Plan is calendar year 2012.
B. Existing Solid Waste Landfills
In 2012, 95% of waste generated by the CFLP District was disposed at four in-district municipal solid
waste landfills and two industrial captive landfills. The remaining 5% was disposed at twelve out-of-
district landfills in Ohio. Coshocton Landfill ceased operation in February 2014. The District did not
own or operate any disposal facilities, nor did it direct waste to specific disposal facilities in the
reference year.
Table III-1 lists all of the landfills to which district waste was direct hauled.
To the best of our knowledge no waste generated in the District was taken to landfills outside of Ohio
for disposal. Table III-7 on which out-of-state facilities would be listed has been omitted since it is
not applicable to this Plan.
The source of this disposal information is the 2012 Annual Operating Reports from landfills
throughout the state. This data was checked against monthly fee reports received by the District
throughout 2012 for accuracy. Data for 2012 is consistent with historic waste flows.
C. Existing Incinerators and Resource Recovery Facilities
There are no resource recovery facilities for the disposal of solid waste in the CFLP District.
According to data gathered by the Ohio EPA, 1.1 tons of municipal solid waste and 109.14 tons of
industrial waste was received by 3 treatment facilities in Indiana from Fairfield and Licking Counties.
Because the information did not specify the waste generators, it is not possible to know if it
duplicates recycling data provided through annual District surveys. There are two animal carcass
incinerators in the district. These incinerators are listed in Table III-2. They are not available to the
public, but are used exclusively for incinerating euthanized shelter animals.
D. Existing Transfer Facilities
There are two transfer facilities licensed in the District. However, only the Lancaster Transfer Facility
reported the transfer of waste from the District for disposal in 2012. At this time, Waste
Management elects not to operate the Newark Transfer Station due to current business
circumstances, but reserves the right to do so in the future. It remains licensed but not operating.
Information regarding the amount of waste from the District that was managed through transfer
facilities is in Table III-3. Eleven out-of-district transfer facilities were used by haulers for the transfer
III-1
of waste generated in the District in 2012. The source of this information is the 2012 Annual
Operating Reports from transfer stations and landfills throughout the state. This data was checked
against monthly fee reports received throughout 2012 for accuracy and it is consistent with
historical waste flows.
E. Existing Recycling and Household Hazardous Waste Collection Activities
Curbside recycling opportunities in the District are listed in Table III-4. The table notes if the program
is “subscription” or “non-subscription.” In the reference year, 56% of the district population had the
opportunity to use curbside recycling services if they chose to do so, most through subscription
service offered by private haulers. Information regarding curbside service was obtained through
annual surveys of all municipalities, townships, and private haulers.
The District supplements curbside collection programs with permanent, multi-material recycling drop-
offs to provide universal access to recycling opportunities. In the reference year, with the exception
of the northernmost part of Coshocton County and small portions of border townships, the entire
population of the District was within five miles of a permanent publicly accessible drop-off location.
However, even those areas have access to recycling close to home through drop-off sites operated
by neighboring solid waste management districts. A list of the recycling drop-off locations and the
materials that were collected in the reference year is included in Table III-5a. Information for Table
III-5a was obtained through quarterly reports from program managers.
Special collection events and litter collection programs are listed in Table III-5b. While not diverting a
large amount of material, these programs are highly visible and raise awareness of the need to
properly manage household waste. Information for Table III-5b was obtained through quarterly
reports from event holders.
In addition to multi-material drop-offs, private scrap recyclers accept materials from the public and
businesses and a number of drop-off opportunities for one or two materials exist. Table III-5c lists
recycling opportunities operated by the private sector. Information for Table III-5c was compiled
using annual surveys of all known recycling programs, companies, and event holders.
In the reference year, no household hazardous waste collection events were held. Residents were
encouraged to use privately owned and operated publicly-available facilities for handling the
materials.
F. Existing Composting/Yard Waste Management Facilities and Programs
The yard waste composting facilities that were registered with Ohio EPA as of 2012 are listed in
Table III-6. In the reference year, thirteen facilities were registered, with seven yard waste facilities
open to the public. The amount of material handled by these facilities in 2012 includes an atypical
amount from the derecho of June 2012. Vast numbers of trees were blown down in that storm and
over the course of the next year, compost facilities were still dealing with the debris. In mid-2013,
the Perry County Compost Facility closed.
G. Existing Open Dumps and Waste Tire Dumps
The open dumps that were identified by county recycling offices or by health departments are listed
III-2
in Table III-8. This list contains only sites that are considered to be significant problems. It does not
include small, road side or private property dump sites that may need to be addressed but that could
be cleaned up in one or two days without the use of heavy equipment.
Due to consistent health department enforcement, education, clean-up programs managed by each
county’s recycling office, and active enforcement of laws against illegal dumping and littering, the
number of dump sites significant enough to be included in the District Plan continues to decrease.
H. Ash, Foundry Sand, and Slag Disposal Sites
Ash disposal sites are used exclusively for the disposal of ash from the burning of municipal solid
waste or of coal. Foundry sand sites are locations that contain sand used in metal casting. Slag
disposal sites are locations that contain the residue from the smelting of metallic ore. Information
regarding the sites that are located in the CFLP District is listed in Table III-9. They are the same two
sites listed in the previous plan.
I. Maps of Facilities and Sites
Small county maps for each of the four counties showing the locations of the in-district disposal
facilities, curbside recycling and multi-material drop-off sites, open dump sites, and composting
facilities listed in this chapter are located in Appendix E. The red pushpins on the map denote
townships or municipalities with non-subscription curbside recycling contracts, and the green
pushpins denote townships or municipalities with subscription curbside recycling contracts. Even
though the pushpins are connected to the name of the municipality or township with the service, the
entire jurisdiction receives the service.
J. Existing Collection Systems - Waste Haulers
Waste collection in the CFLP District continues to be dominated by private waste haulers. The City of
Lancaster is the only municipality that operates a citywide waste collection program using city owned
vehicles operated by city employees. Several cities, villages and townships contract with waste
haulers to provide waste collection and recycling services, or just waste collection, to the residents of
the municipality or township. However, the majority of the District is served by private haulers who
contract with property owners on an individual subscription basis. A few haulers provide curbside
recycling service on a subscription basis to residential customers in the more densely populated
areas of the District.
The list of haulers provided on Table III-10 was provided by the four county health departments.
Health departments no longer license waste haulers, and Fairfield County does not register waste
haulers. Data provided for each hauler was obtained through annual surveys of waste haulers and
supplemented with information compiled by the health departments.
III-3
Table III-1 2012 District Waste Taken Directly to Landfills
Waste Received from the SWMD (TPY)

Type of General
Facility Name Landfill Location (Note 1) Industrial Exempt CDD Total
AEP Conesville Residual Waste Landfill C, PO Coshocton Co., OH 645,542.00 354,228.00 999,770.00
Coshocton Landfill, Inc. PA, PO Coshocton Co., OH 12,911.27 20,829.59 1,856.54 35,597.40
Pine Grove Regional Facility Landfill PA, PO Fairfield Co., OH 13,426.45 34,166.68 17,535.54 1,353.45 66,482.12
Owens Corning Landfill C, PO Licking Co., OH 16,003.00 16,003.00
Suburban South R & D Facility PA, PO Perry Co., OH 56,370.67 29,668.05 2,398.55 88,437.27
Tunnell Hill PA, PO Perry County, OH 96,624.84 1,419.40 98,044.24
In-District Sub-Total 179,333.23 746,209.32 371,763.54 7,027.94 1,304,334.03
Athens Hocking Reclamation Center PA, PO Athens Co., OH 1,317.24 7,504.41 8,821.65
SWACO Landfill PA, GO Franklin Co, OH 202 6.79 208.79
Beech Hollow Landfill PA, PO Jackson Co., OH 17.46 17.46
Apex Landfill PA, PO Jefferson Co. OH 120.52 120.52
Carbon Limestone Landfill PA, PO Mahoning Co., OH 64.86 64.86
American Landfill PA, PO Stark Co., OH 1.91 1,216.36 47.65 1,265.92
Kimble Sanitary Landfill PA, PO Tuscarawas Co., OH 7530.44 12,388.39 5.03 278.77 20,202.63
Evergreen Landfill PA, PO Wood Co., OH 0.12 0.27 0.39
Hancock Co. Landfill PA, GO Hancock Co., OH 3.5 3.50
Out-of-District Sub Total 9,172.23 21,198.54 52.68 282.27 30,705.72
Total 188,505.46 767,407.86 371,816.22 7,310.21 1,335,039.75
Key: PA means "publicly available", C means "captive" PO means "privately owned," GO means "government owned"
Note 1: Includes 56.5 tons asbestos disposed of in Suburban South, Pine Grove, American and Evergreen Landfills. Ohio Revised Code changed
asbestos to an exempt waste beginning August 2012, so subsequent years will include asbestos with the Exempt waste category.
III-4
Table III-2 Solid Waste Incinerators and Treatment Facilities Used by the District
Waste Received from the SWMD (TPY)

Facility Name and Location Type of Facility Ash
Area Served Res/Com Industrial Exempt Total
Produced
Licking County Animal Control
Animal Carcass incinerator Licking Co.,
Dog Leg Road 3.5 3.5 .39
(Gov't owned and operated) OH
Heath, OH 43055
Fairfield County Animal Control
Animal Carcass incinerator Fairfield Co.,
Granville Pike Not reported
(Gov't owned and operated) OH
Lancaster, OH 43130
Indianapolis Resource
Resource Recovery Multi-State .8 109.14 109.94
Recovery Facility
MedAssure of Indiana
Treatment Multi-State
Treatment Facility
EQ Industrial Services
Processing Multi-State .3 .3
Processing Facility
III-5
Table III-3 2012 District Waste Flow through Transfer Facilities
Transfer Facility Name and Destination Type of Waste Received from the SWMD (TPY)
Landfill Facility Location General Industrial Exempt CDD Total
Lancaster Transfer (Pine Grove) PA, GO Fairfield Co., OH 31,280.77 31,280.77
In-District Sub-Total 31,280.77 0 0 0 31,280.77
Reynolds Avenue Transfer (Pine Grove) PA, PO Franklin Co., OH 5,941.96 1,031.95 6,973.91
Mt. Vernon Transfer (Pine Grove) PA, PO Knox Co., OH 341.59 86.61 428.2
Johnson Transfer & Recycling (Suburban) PA, PO Franklin Co., OH 15,535.11 122 15,657.11
SWACO Jackson Pike (SWACO) PA, GO Franklin Co., OH 13.24 13.24
SWACO Morse Rd (SWACO) PA, GO Franklin Co., OH 4.11 4.11
Kimble Transfer & Recycling Facility
(Kimble) PA, PO Guernsey Co., OH 143.34 32.03 175.37
WM of Ohio Mound Transfer Facility (Pike
Co) PA, PO Ross Co., OH 19.11 10 29.11
Richland Transfer (Noble Rd) Richland Co., OH 1,150.35 7.73 1,158.08
Rumpke Circleville Transfer (Beech Hollow) PA, PO Pickaway Co., OH 24,036.06 616.41 24,652.47
Rumpke Columbus Transfer (Beech
Hollow) PA, PO Franklin Co., OH 12,948.19 12,948.19
Delaware County Transfer (Crawford) PA, PO Delaware Co., OH 4.69 11.69 16.38
Out-of-District Sub Total 60,137.75 10.00 0.00 1,908.42 62,056.17
Total 91,418.52 10.00 0.00 1,908.42 93,336.94
Key: PA means "publicly available", PO means "privately owned," GO means "government owned"
III-6
Key to Curbside Programs Listed on Table III-4

Type of Curbside
Non-subscription curbside: available to all households in service area as part of
NS
waste collection program
Subscription curbside: available to households that subscribe to and pay for
S
recycling collection service
Key to Recycling Programs Listed on Table III-5

Type of Recycling
Program
Buy-back: payment given for recyclables-usually refers to recycling centers and
BB
scrap yards that buy household recyclables like aluminum cans from the public
DO Drop-off: recycling collection site; may be staffed or self-serve; no payment for

materials
MRF Material recovery facility: facility for the sorting and processing of recyclables;
usually refers to facilities that process household recyclables
Scrap yard: Facility for the processing of scrap materials; usually refers to facilities
SY that purchase metallic or non-metallic scrap from commercial and industrial
sources, but may also receive materials from residential recyclers
Key to Recycled Materials Managed by Recycling Programs Listed in Tables III-4 and III-5
Glass Paper Plastic
PETE (Polyethylene
Blue glass bottles BlG Magazines and catalogues Mag P#1
terephthalate) bottles
HDPE (High-density
Brown glass bottles and Mixed Paper (includes
BrG MxP polyethylene) bottle (milk, P#2
jars "junk mail")
detergent, etc.)
Clear glass bottles and PS (Polystyrene) (egg
ClG Corrugated cardboard OCC P#6
jars cartons, plates, etc.)
Green glass bottles and
GrG Office paper OffP Miscellanea
jars
Metals Newspaper ONP Electronics Elec
Paperboard boxes (cereal,
Aluminum cans AlC PBd Lead acid batteries LAB
cracker)
Coated paperboard cartons
Used clothing and other
Appliances App and "aseptic" boxes (milk, PBdC Tex
textiles
juice, etc.)
Used motor oil Uoil
Household aerosol cans ArC Telephone books PhBk Shoes (except high heels
Shoes
over 2" and rubber boots)
Ferrous metal (scrap iron
FerM Wood Yard Waste
and steel)
Non- ferrous scrap metal
(aluminum, brass, NonFM Wood pallets WP Brush Brush
copper, etc.)
Steel food and beverage Trees, large limbs, lumber,
StC WW Grass Clippings Grass
cans misc. wood waste, etc.
Leaves Lvs
General yard waste,
grass, leaves and small YW
brush
III-7
Table III-4 Curbside Recycling Opportunities in District 2012 (Updated to include changes made in 2013, 2014, 2015)
Frequency Recyclables
Type of Population Type of Material
Curbside Recycling of Service Area Processed Service Provider
Curbside Served Collected
Collection from SWD
Coshocton County
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Subscription curbside offered by J
County outside Mag, ONP, OCC,
& J Hauling to individual NS Weekly 94.75 J & J Hauling
Coshocton City PhB, P#1, P#2,
customers
StC
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Mag, NP, OCC, J & J Hauling/Big
Coshocton City Curbside NS 11,173 weekly Coshocton City 225.01
PhB, P#1, P#2, O Refuse
StC
Fairfield County
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Berne Township Curbside
GrG, Mag, NP, Community Action
Contact: Community Action NS 4,662 weekly Berne Township 127.78
OCC, PhB, P#1, Recycling Center
Recycling Center
P#2, StC, BlG
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Madison Township Curbside
Twice per Madison GrG, Mag, NP, Community Action
Contact: Community Action NS 1,685 4.83
month Township OCC, PhB, P#1, Recycling Center
Recycling Center
P#2, StC, BlG
Lithopolis Village
AlC, BrG, CLG,
33 N Market St
ONP, Mag, MxP,
PO Box 278 NS 1,172 weekly Lithopolis Village 55.6 Traces Sanitation
OCC, P#1, P#2,
Lithopolis, OH 43136
StC
614-837-2031
Pleasantville Village
Not operating
207 W. Columbus St. Pleasantville AlC, ONP, P#1, Local Waste
NS 955 Weekly until October
Pleasantville, OH 43148 Village P#2, StC, OCC Services
2013
740-468-2237
III-8
Collection from SWD
Carroll Village
Not operating
68 Center St. AlC, ONP, P#1, Local Waste
NS 524 Weekly Carroll Village until October
Carroll, OH 43112 P#2, StC, OCC Services
2013
740-756-4031
Millersport Village offered by Big- Included in Big-
AlC, BrG, CLG,
O Refuse O report for all
Millersport Mag, MxP, ONP,
229 Dayton Rd NE S 1,047 weekly programs. (See Big - O Refuse
Village OCC, PB, PhB,
Newark, OH 43055 Licking County
P#1-#7,StC
740-344-7544 listing below.)
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Pickerington City
Mag, MxP, ONP,
Contact: 888-786-7531 S 18,692 Weekly Pickerington City 215.7 Rumpke
OCC, PB, PhB,
www.rumpkerecycling.com
P#1-#7,StC
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Violet Township Reported with
Mag, MxP, ONP,
Contact: 888-786-7531 S 19,154 Weekly Violet Township Pickerington Rumpke
OCC, PB, PhB,
www.rumpkerecycling.com total
P#1-#7,StC
Baltimore Village
103 W. Market St., Baltimore AlC, ONP, P#1,
S 3,048 Weekly Baltimore Village Not reported Waste Mgmt
43105 P#2, StC, OCC
Contact: 740-862-4191
Sugar Grove Village Sugar Grove AlC, ONP, P#1,

NS 5,228 Weekly Not reported Waste Mgmt
Contact: 740-746-8406 Village P#2, StC, OCC
Licking County
AlC, BrG, CLG,
Etna Township Curbside Mag, MxP, ONP,
S 8,368 weekly Etna Township 984.66 Rumpke
Contact: 888-786-7531 OCC, PB, PhB,
www.rumpkerecycling.com P#1-#7,StC
III-9
Collection from SWD
Subscription to individual Unidentified
Subscription Curbside offered by customers throughout areas (but AlC, BrG, CLG,
Big-O Refuse county. Individual includes Mag, MxP, ONP,
47.19 Big - O Refuse
229 Dayton Rd NE political entities served individual OCC, PB, PhB,
Newark, OH 43055 via a contract are listed customers in P#1-#7,StC
740-344-7544 below Heath
Union Twp. (Big-O) S 3,734 Union Twp. above 57.2 Big - O Refuse
Bowling Green
Bowling Green Township (Big-O) S 1,762 above 2.29 Big - O Refuse
Twp.
Madison Township (Big-O) S 3,190 Madison Twp. above 3.72 Big - O Refuse
Johnstown (Big-O) NS 4,806 Johnstown Village above 202.77 Big - O Refuse
Monroe Township (Big-O) S 2,336 all are Monroe Twp. above 9.72 Big - O Refuse
weekly
Granville Village (Big-O) S 5,638 Granville Village above 314.6 Big - O Refuse
Granville Twp. (Big-O) S 4,180 Granville Twp. above 108.39 Big - O Refuse
Newark City (Big-O) S 47,688 Newark City above 21.45 Big - O Refuse
St. Albans Twp. (Big-O) S 1,933 St. Albans Twp. above 12.01 Big - O Refuse
Started in
Harrison Twp. (Big-O) S 7,107 Harrison Twp above Big - O Refuse
2013
Started in
Hebron (Big-O) S 2,375 Hebron above Big - O Refuse
2014
Started in
McKean Twp (Big-O) S 1,549 McKean Twp Above Republic
2014
Pataskala
AlC, BrG, CLG, Waste
Waste Management, Inc.
Mag, MxP, ONP, Management, Inc.
1006 Walnut Street NS 15,091 weekly City of Pataskala Not reported
OCC, PB, PhB, (changed to Big O
Canal Winchester, OH 43110
P#1-#7,StC Refuse in 2013)
(800) 343-6047
III-10
Collection from SWD
Subscription Curbside offered by

Unidentified AlC, BrG, CLG,
Waste Management, Inc. Subscription to individual
because they Mag, MxP, ONP, Waste
1006 Walnut Street customers throughout weekly Not reported
operate OCC, PB, PhB, Management, Inc.
Canal Winchester, OH 43110 county
countywide P#1-#7,StC
(800) 343-6047
Waste
Newark City (WMI) S Newark City above Not reported
47,688 Management, Inc.
III-11
Table III-5A. CFLP Solid Waste Management District Recycling Opportunities-County Managed Drop-offs
Type of Activity: PA, DO
Primarily Residential but available to Commercial and Industrial
All Sites Available 24 hours a day, seven days a week
Recyclables
Processed
Population from District
Facility/Activity Name, Mailing Address, Phone Number Service Areas Served - Tons
Coshocton County Drop-off Bin Program
Contact: Jeff Wherley
Coshocton County Recycling Office
300 Bridge St., Nellie
All Sites accept AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, PBd, P#1, P#2, StC
Warsaw, OH 43844
877-924-5533
Reference year - 9 locations listed below
Adams Twp./Bakersville at 59469 CR 2 near Twp. Garage Adams Twp, including Bakersville 788 8.44
Franklin Twp./Conesville at 508 Franklin Ave. behind Village Hall Franklin Twp., including Conesville 1,228 11.8
Jefferson Twp./Nellie on 2nd Street next to Community Bldg. Jefferson Twp., including Nellie and Warsaw 1,497 12.22
Perry Twp./New Guilford at 32531 SR 541 (Intersection of SR 541 and SR 206) Perry Twp., including New Guilford 708 8.64
Linton Twp./Plainfield at intersection of Main St. and Park Ave. Linton Twp., including Plainfield 648 15.19
Jefferson Twp./Warsaw on Marvin Davis Drive in the Park (Off of SR 36) Jefferson Twp., including Nellie and Warsaw 1,497 33.53
Pike Twp./West Carlisle at the Pike Township Hall Pike Twp., including West Carlisle 635 5.14
Lafayette Twp./West Lafayette at 117 East Main St. Lafayette Twp. , including West Lafayette 4,062 34.17
Tiverton Township - St. Rt. 206 and Co. Rd. 20 Tiverton Township 446 6.31
Total Tons: 135.44
Fairfield County Drop-off Bin Program
Fairfield County
Contact: Patty Bratton
Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action Recycling Center
All Sites accept AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, PBd, P#1, P#2, StC, OffP, BrG, ClG, GrG, BlG
1761 E. Main St. (PO Box 768)
Lancaster, OH 43130-0768
740-687-1295
III-12
Reference year - 23 locations listed below

Liberty Twp./Baltimore at 500 W. Washington St., Liberty Union HS Lot Liberty Twp., including Baltimore 7,968 48.93
Walnut Twp - St. Rt. 37 at Micro Materials - moved in 2013 to 11420 Walnut Twp., including Thurston, Pleasantville and
Millersport Rd. Millersport 6,841 5.27
Amanda Twp./Amanda at Halderman & Kirby Streets near Water Tower Amanda Twp., including Amanda 2,728 48.8
Berne Twp/Sugar Grove at 600 N. Elm St. Berne Twp., including Sugar Grove 5,114 32.57
Bloom Twp./Lithopolis at 7698 Oberlin Ct., College View Subdivision Bloom Twp, including Lithopolis 8,260 41.43
Greenfield Twp -3245 Havensport Rd. Greenfield Twp, including Carroll 5,565 55.34
Hocking Twp. at the Twp. Bldg. on SR 22 West - removed in 2013 Hocking Twp. 4,698 33.01
Lancaster at E. Main, Community Action Agency Lancaster 38,854 145.21
Lancaster at Hunter Trace Park-907 Lincoln Ave Lancaster 38,854 92.34
Lancaster at the Sheriff's Office, West Wheeling St. Lot Lancaster 38,854 69.3
Lancaster at 114 Mt. Ida Ave. behind Utica Head Start Bldg. Lancaster 38,854 41.32
Lancaster at 1475 Tiki Lane, Tiki Bowling Alley Lot Lancaster 38,854 137.53
Lancaster at 951 Liberty Dr., Liberty Center Lancaster 38,854 149.88
Lancaster at 1570 Granville Pike, Ohio University Lancaster 38,854 70
Lancaster at 324 Gay St - added in 2013 Lancaster 38,854 0
Lancaster at 2095 W. Fair Ave. - added in 2014 Lancaster 38,854 0
Clearcreek Twp./Oakland Grocery at 9101Chillicothe-Lancaster Rd. (SR 159) Clearcreek Twp, including Stoutsville 4,065 43.58
Pickerington City at Hill Rd. - removed in 2013 Violet Twp, including Pickerington 37,855 51.99
Pleasant Twp. at 3005 Lancaster-Thornville Rd. NE (SR 188 and Coonpath Rd.) Pleasant Twp. 6,122 131.41
Richland Twp. At 8885 Pleasantville Road NE Richland Twp. including Rushville & W. Rushville 2,217 31.73
Richland Twp. at 3150 Market St, Rushville - added in 2014 Richland Twp, including Rushville & W. Rushville 2,217 0
Clearcreek Twp./Stoutsville behind the Village Garage on Main St. Clearcreek Twp. , including Stoutsville 4,168 41.42
Violet Twp at Zeller Park on Benadum Rd. Violet Twp, including Pickerington 37,855 34.78
Violet Twp. at the Twp. Maintenance Lot, Center St. at Stemen Rd.,
Pickerington Violet Twp, including Pickerington 37,855 311.04
Violet Twp. at Ohio University Pickerington Center, 2933 Stonecreek Drive Violet Twp, including Pickerington 37,855 220.54
Violet Twp. at Trinity Family Life Center, 6389 Blacklick-Eastern Rd.
Pickerington Violet Twp, including Pickerington 37,855 40.07
Total Tons: 1877.49
III-13
Licking County Drop-off Bin Program

Licking County
Contact: Lindsey Grimm
Licking County Recycling & Litter Prevention
777 E. Main St. All Sites accept AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, PBd, P#1, P#2, StC 42.68
Newark, OH 43055 cardboard
only from
740-670-5125 various
23 Locations in reference year locations
St. Albans Twp./Alexandria at Fireman's Park St. Albans Twp., including Alexandria 2,451 43.78
Hartford Twp./Croton at 26 Smith St. Hartford Twp., including Croton 1,431 20.54
Etna Twp. at 1145 South St. SW, Etna at the Twp. Garage Etna Twp. 8,368 56.22
Franklin Twp. At 11076 Flint Ridge Rd at the Fire Station Franklin Twp. 2,134 13.24
Granville at 1956 Lancaster Rd. SW behind Sunoco Station Granville Twp., including Granville 9,802 24.98
Hanover Twp./ Hanover Village at 2450 W. High St. Hanover Twp., including Hanover 2,817 77.73
Harrison Twp. at the Service Complex on Outville Rd., Outville Harrison Twp., including Kirkersville and Outville 7,635 80.4
Heath at 1287 Hebron Rd. in the Municipal Parking Lot Heath City 10,389 167.32
Union Twp./Hebron at 40 Canal St., Canal Park Union Twp., including Hebron and Buckeye Lake 8,806 74.71
Hebron Industrial Park - removed in 2013 Union Twp., including Hebron and Buckeye Lake 8,806 4.53
Jersey Twp. at intersection of SR 161 and Mink Rd. Jersey Twp. 2,749 51.23
Liberty Twp - Northridge and Sportsmanclub Rds. Liberty Twp 2,382 31.23
Mary Ann Twp - Wilkins Corner Mary Ann Twp 2,121 20.89
Monroe Twp./Johnstown at the Village Office, 599 S. Main St. Monroe Twp., including Johnstown 7,142 49.71
McKean Twp. at 1260 Sportsman Club, Fredonia McKean Twp. 1,532 20
Newark at 877 E Main St. behind the Auto Title Office Newark 47,688 67.62
Newark at Deo Drive in the lot in front of Odd Lots and TSC - moved in 2013 to
Wesleyan Community Church at 161 Myrtle Ave. Newark 47,688 435.96
Newark at intersection of Cherry Valley Rd. and Reddington Rd. Newark 47,688 180.18
Newark on W. Church Street at Flory Park Newark 47,688 242.75
Newark at 1000 Granville Rd., First Baptist Church Newark 47,688 34.3
Newark - Everett Ave. Newark 47,688 20.25
III-14
Newton Twp./St. Louisville at 1 School St. behind the Village Offices Newton Twp., including St. Louisville 3,242 15.47
Washington Twp./Utica at 800 Church St. near the Twp. Garage Washington Twp., including Utica 3,121 39.94
Total Tons: 1815.66
Perry County Drop-off Bin Program

Perry County
Contact: Matt Reed, Perry County Recycling and Litter Prevention
2235 St. Rt. 13 NE All Sites accept AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, P#1, P#2, StC, BrG, ClG
New Lexington, OH 43764
Phone: 740-342-7881
19 locations in the reference year.
Bearfield Twp. at 800 SR 13 SE (Six Mile Turn) beside Hunter's Run Market Bearfield Twp. 1,670 31.94
Clayton Twp. at Saltillo Grange on SR 345 Clayton Twp. 1,558 23.51
Monroe Twp./Corning at 115 S. Valley St. near Eagle's Parking Lot Monroe Twp., including Corning 1,499 26.2
Harrison Twp./Crooksville at 98 South Buckeye St. Municipal Bldg. Parking Lot Harrison Twp., including Crooksville and Roseville 5,982 44.74
Hopewell Twp./Glenford at 103 Broad St. behind Firehouse Hopewell Twp., including Glenford 2,396 32.02
Salt Lick Twp./Hemlock at 8780 Main St. at Park Salt Lick Twp., including Hemlock, Shawnee 1,256 18.66
Jackson Twp./Junction City at 500 E. Main St. east side of Sunoco Station Lot Jackson Twp., including Junction City 2,847 40.88
New Lexington at 499 N. State St. at DD offices Pike Twp., including New Lexington 6,910 56.98
New Lexington at 605 N. Main St. behind Huff 'n' Puff Mini Mart Pike Twp., including New Lexington 6,910 43.95
New Lexington, 520 Front St. near Senior Citizens Center Pike Twp., including New Lexington 6,910 23.11
New Lexington-2235 SR 13 NE at PerCo Inc. Pike Twp., including New Lexington 6,910 92.43
Coal Twp./New Straitsville, Main St. Coal Twp., including New Straitsville 1,036 23.79
Harrison Twp./Roseville at the Fire Dept. on 1st St. Harrison Twp., including Crooksville and Roseville 5,982 39.21
Salt Lick Twp./Shawnee on Main St. at Twp. Building Salt Lick Twp., including Hemlock, Shawnee 1,256 25.87
Reading Twp./Somerset at 228 S. Columbus St. moved to SR 22 in 2013 Reading Twp., including Somerset 4,363 51.27
Reading Twp./Somerset at 139 E. Main St.- removed in 2014 Reading Twp., including Somerset 4,363 64.96
Thorn Twp./Thornville at 65 E. Columbus St., Grace Lutheran Church Thorn Twp., including Thornville, Thornport 4,314 51.58
Thorn Twp/Thornport Thorn Twp., including Thornville, Thornport 4,314 71.86
Thorn Twp./Thornville at Firehouse Thorn Twp., including Thornville, Thornport 4,314 41.62
Total Tons: 804.58
III-15
Table III-5B. Special Collection Events and Litter Collection
Type of Activity: Materials Recycled from Litter Collection - Year Round

Materials: Tires and Appliances
Service Area: Entire County
Sector: Primarily Residential
Population
Facility/Activity Name, Mailing Address, Phone Number Served Recyclables Processed from District - Tons
Coshocton County 36,779 26.2
Fairfield County 135,992 16.37
Licking County 158,787 3.03
Perry County 36,768 11.29
Type of Activity: Special Collection Events

Service Area: Entire County
Sector: Residential
Materials Hours Available Recyclables Processed

Facility/Activity Name, Mailing Address, Phone Number Accepted to Public from District - Tons
Coshocton County Tire Collection tires 4 hours 9.49
MxP, drugs,
Fairfield County Elec 4 hours 1.78
24 hours, 7
Licking County - Electronics Collection Elec days/week 8.5
App, tires,
Uoil, FerM,
Perry County -Ultimate Recycling Days NonFM 3 hours 11.62
88.28
III-16
Table III-5C. Government Offices and Public Schools
Type of Activity: Govt. Office and Public School Pick up

Materials: Varies by site, primarily OffP, MxP, OCC, AlC, StC
Sector: Commercial
Recyclables
Facility/Activity Name, Processed
Mailing Address, Phone from District -
Number Service Areas Tons
County offices and schools: Courthouse, Co, Eng., Annex, Juvenile Court, EMS. Title
Coshocton County Bldg, County Svc., Jobs & Family Svc., Hopewell School, Riverview High School 30.02
Elementary, secondary schools, college campuses, county offices, municipal offices,
Fairfield County some state offices 106.44
Licking County Government offices 40.25
Perry County Government offices, elementary and secondary schools 87.06
263.78
III-17
Table III-5D. Private Recyclers, Scrapyards, MRF's, End Use Industries
Percent of
Material
from Sector:
Residential -
Recyclables R, Percent of
Hours Processed Commercial- Processing
Facility/Activity Name, Mailing Type of Facility or Population Available to from District - C, Industrial- Capacity
Address, Phone Number Activity Materials Accepted Service Areas Served Public Tons I Utilized
AlC, BrG, ClG, GrG, Mag, Rushcreek
Bremen Dropoff, 9090 Marietta St, PO PA, DO operated by NP, OCC, OffP, PBd, P#1, Twp, including 24 hours/7
Box 127, Bremen, OH, 740-569-4788 Big O Refuse P#2, StC Bremen 3,928 days/week 2.29 Primarily R NA
Other Multi-Material Drop-off Opportunities
Coshocton County
Accepts: BrG, ClG, GrG,
ONP, OCC, P#1, P#2, StC, 8am-4pm M-
Skip's Recycling AlC F
8am-
22375 County Rd. 1A (Purchases AlC) 11:30am S
Coshocton, OH 43812
Entire
740-622-9482 PA, DO,BB Entire County County 122 R, C, and I NA
Fairfield County
Community Action Recycling Center PA, DO,BB,
AlC, BrG, ClG, GrG,BlG
LAB, Mag, MxP, NonFM,
1761 E. Main St. MRF (associated ONP, OCC, OffP, PBd, P#1,
drop-off listed in P#2, StC, UOil, and
Lancaster, OH 43130 drop-offs above) Confidential Document M-F 9am- reported under
Shredding, Cell Phones and Entire 5pm – Sat. individual Not
740-687-1295 Inkjet Cartridges, clothing Entire County County 8am-1pm dropoff sites R, C and I Reported
Licking County
Denison University Red Barn
AlC, Al foil, BrG, ClG, GrG,
1385 N. Pearl St.
Mag, MxP, OCC, ONP, 24 hours, 7 R , C, and
Granville, OH 43023 PA, DO OffP, P#1, P#2, StC Entire County 9,802 days a week 731 Institutional NA
SBC Recycling AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, PBd, Entire County, Entire M-F, 8 am-5 Not
6589 Bennington Chapel Rd. PA, DO, SY, MRF P#1, P#2, StC Region County pm 20,114.66 R and C Reported
III-18
Centerburg, OH 43011
740-893-3567
Perry County
PerCo, Inc. 7:30a-3:30p
2235 St. Rt. 13 NE M-F for MRF;
AlC, Mag, ONP, OCC, OffP, DO - 24 reported under
PBd, P#1, P#2, StC, CFL Entire hours, 7 days individual Not
740-342-5156 PA, DO, MRF bulbs Entire County County a week dropoff sites R, C, I Reported
Other Single or Limited Material Drop-off Opportunities

Coshocton County
Rock Tenn (formerly Smurfit-Stone
Container)
500 N. Fourth Street
Coshocton, OH 43812
Mag, ONP, MxP, Pbd, OCC, Coshocton Entire 24 hours, 7 Not
740-622-6543 PA, DO OffP Area County days a week 590 R Reported
Goodwill Industries
301 Main St.
Used clothing, small
Coshocton, OH 43812
PA, DO and resale household items, furniture,
740-622-2288 store electronics Region NA Not reported R,C, I NA
Coshocton County Health Dept.
724 Seventh St.
Coshocton, OH 43812
Entire Not
740-622-1426 PA, DO CFL bulbs, mercury Region County M-F 8-4 0 R Reported
RiverView Schools
Warsaw Elem, Conesville Elem, Union
Elem., River
View Jr. High and HS
PA, DO ink jet cartridges Region NA school hours Not reported R,C, I NA
ReStore
1301 Walnut St.
Coshocton, OH 43812
PA, DO and resale Reusable building materials Saturdays 9
740-623-2764 store and tools Region NA am - 4 pm Not reported R,C, I NA
III-19
Salvation Army
rear of 219 N. Fourth St.
Coshocton, OH 43812
PA, DO and resale Used clothing, small
740-622-0971 store household items, furniture Region NA Not reported R NA
Mullet Tire Service
23839 Airport Rd.
Coshocton, OH 43812
Passenger and truck tires Coshocton 8a-5p M-F, Not
740-623-8473 PA, Tire Retailer (fee) Area NA 8a-Noon S Not reported R, C, I Reported
Coshocton Tire
110 W Pine Street
Coshocton, OH 43812
Coshocton 8a-5p M-F, Not
740-622-7993 PA, Tire Retailer Tires (fee) Area NA 8a-Noon S Not reported R and C Reported
Advance Auto Parts
329 S. Second Street
Coshocton, OH 43812
PA, Auto Parts Coshocton 7a-9p M-S, Not
740-622-6008 Store UOil, LAB, Antifreeze Area NA 9a-9p Sun. Not reported R Reported
541 Auto Repair
720 W. Chestnut St.
Coshocton, OH 43812
PA, Auto Parts Coshocton 7a-9p M-S, Not
740-295-5412 Store UOil Area NA 9a-9p Sun. Not reported R Reported
Auto Zone M-Sat. 8 to 9,
Sun. 8:30 to
340 S. Second Street 9
Coshocton, OH 42812
PA, Auto Parts Coshocton Not
740-622-0373 Store UOil Area NA Not reported R Reported
Prince's Wrecking Service
134 Fifth Street
Coshocton, OH 42812
PA, Auto Parts Coshocton Not
740-622-3916 Store UOil Area NA 8a-5p M-F Not reported R and C Reported
Coshocton City Fire Dept
S. 7th St. Coshocton Not
Coshocton, OH 43812 PA, DO rechargeable batteries Area NA 8a-5p M-F Not reported R and C Reported
III-20
740-622-2555
Walhonding Valley Fire Dept.
100 Bridge St.
Warsaw, OH 43844
Coshocton Not
740-824-3100 PA, DO rechargeable batteries Area NA 8a-5p M-F Not reported R and C Reported
Fairfield County
Fairfield County Abitibi Paper Retriever 43 bins placed
Program around the
For current site information refer to: county at
school,
churches, and
businesses for Most
retrieval of locations are
paper. List of available 24
sites is hours, 7 days
Mag, MxP, ONP, OffP (no included in Entire a week for all
www.paperretriever.com PA, DO PhBks or OCC) Appendix F County locations 1,163.80 R and C NA
Menard's
1425 Ety Pointe Dr.
Lancaster, OH 43130
Entire Not
740-654-3538 PA, Retail Store CFL bulbs Region County M-F 8-4 Not reported R Reported
Lowe's
2240 Lowes Dr.
CFL bulbs, cell phones,
Lancaster, OH 43130
plastic flower containers, Entire Not
740-681-3464 PA, Retail Store rechargeable batteries Region County M-F 8-4 Not reported R Reported
Best Buy
1645 River Valley Circle N
Lancaster, OH 43130
electronics, TV's, Entire Not
740-654-8314 PA, Retail Store rechargeable batteries Region County M-F 8-4 Not reported R Reported
Fairfield County Health Dept.
1587 Granville Pike
Lancaster, OH 43130
Entire Not
740-652-2802 PA, DO mercury Region County M-F 8-4 0 R Reported
Kroger PA, DO at Retail Plastic- Lancaster 24
1735 N. Memorial Dr. &1141 E. Main St. Grocery Shopping bags only Area NA hours/7days Not reported R and C NA
III-21
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-654-2511 & 740-653-3244
Giant Eagle Plastic-
1394 Ety Shops Way NW Shopping bags only
Lancaster, OH 43130
PA, DO at Retail Lancaster 24
740-654-4765 Grocery Area NA hours/7days Not reported R and C NA
Goodwill Industries
1144 N. Memorial Dr.
Lancaster, OH 43130
Salvation Army
123 E. Hubert Ave.
Lancaster, OH 43130
PA, DO and resale Used clothing, small
740-687-1921 store household items, furniture Region NA Not reported R,C, I NA
ReStore
3476 Cincinnati-Zanesville Rd. NE
Fri 8 am-2
Lancaster, OH 43130
PA, DO and resale Reusable building materials pm, Sat. 8
740-654-3434 store and tools Region NA am - noon Not reported R,C, I NA
UPS Store Plastic- 8:30a-6:30p
M-F, 8:30a to
1641 N. Memorial Dr. Packing Peanuts only 3p S
Lancaster, OH 43130
Lancaster
740-654-5335 PA, DO at Store Area NA Not reported R and C NA
UPS Store Plastic- 8a-7p M-F,
1209 Hill Rd. Packing Peanuts only 9a-4p S
Pickerington, OH 43147
Pickerington
614-575-1166 PA, DO at Store Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Lancaster Transfer Station
743 S. Ewing St.
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-687-6660 PA, DO App, Tires (fee) Lancaster NA 7:30a-4p M-F 19.6 R NA
Smetzer Tire PA, Tire Retailer Tires (fee) Lancaster NA 7:30a-5:30p Not reported R NA
III-22
777 S. Columbus St. Area M-F,

Lancaster, Oh 43130 7:30a-1p S
740-654-0161
Bloom Elementary
200 Market St.
Lithopolis, OH
Fairfield R and
740-837-4044 PA, School Toner and ink Jet Cartridges County NA school hours Not reported Institutional NA
Ohio Gas of Lancaster
1889 Logan-Lancaster Rd. SE
Lancaster, OH 43130
Fairfield
740-654-7973 PA, DO propane tanks County NA Not reported R,C, I NA
All Star Auto Care
283 Cedar Hill Rd.
Lancaster, OH 43130
PA, Auto Parts Lancaster
740-687-5071 Store UOil Area NA 8a-5p M-F Not reported R and C NA
Scott's Marathon Service Center 7a-9p M-F
8:30a-8:30p
159 N. Memorial Dr. S
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-653-1448 Store UOil, LAB, Antifreeze Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Madison Township
3175 Clearcreek Rd.
Lancaster, OH 43130
Lancaster 7:30a-5:30p
740-687-5071 PA, DO UOil Area NA M-F Not reported R NA
Milby Automotive
2413 E. Main St.
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-687-5762 Store UOil Area NA 8a-5:30p M-F 4.2 R and C NA
Battery Giant
1412 Ety Rd.
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-277-7123 PA, DO batteries Region NA 7:30a-3p M-F Not reported R,C, I NA
III-23
Toxco
8090 Lancaster Rd.
Baltimore, OH 43105
740-653-6290 PA, DO batteries Region NA 7:30a-3p M-F Not reported R,C, I NA
Walnut Township
11420 Millersport Rd
Millersport, OH 43046
Walnut
740-467-2420 PA, DO UOil Township NA 7:30a-3p M-F Not reported R NA
Licking County
Licking County Abitibi Paper Retriever 90 bins placed
Program around the
For current site information refer to: county at
schools,
churches, and
businesses for Most
retrieval of locations are
paper. List of available 24
sites is hours, 7 days
Mag, MxP, ONP, OffP (no included in Entire a week for all
www.paperretriever.com PA, DO PhBks or OCC) Appendix F County locations 2,002.66 R and C NA
Licking County Computer Society
twice/yr
PA, collection Entire collection
740-404-3963 events Elec Region County events Not reported R,C, I NA
Home Depot
1330 N. 21st St.
Newark, OH 43055
Entire Not
740-364-1241 PA, Retail Store CFL bulbs Region County M-F 8-4 Not reported R Reported
Lowe's
888 Hebron Rd.
CFL bulbs , cell phones,
Heath, OH 43056
plastic flower containers, Entire Not
740-522-0003 PA, Retail Store rechargeable batteries, LAB Region County M-F 8-4 Not reported R Reported
CFLP Solid Waste District
675 Price Rd. Entire Not
Newark, OH 43055 PA, DO CFL bulbs Region County M-F 8-4 0 R Reported
III-24
740-349-6308
Licking County Health Dept.
675 Price Rd.
Newark, OH 43055
Entire Not
Ohio Gas
3216 National Rd. NW
Hebron, OH
Entire
740-928-4306 PA, DO propane tanks Region County Not reported R,C, I NA
Ferrellgas
451 National Rd. SE
Hebron, OH
Entire
The Energy Cooperative
1500 Granville Rd.
Newark, OH 43055
Entire
Express Pack'n'Ship Plastic-
299 Deo Drive Packing Peanuts only
Newark, OH 43055
740-366-1325 PA, DO Newark Area NA 9a-6p M-F Not reported R and C NA
Boxes and Bows Plastic- 10a-6p M-F
474 S. Main St. Packing Peanuts only 10a-1p S
Granville, OH 43023 Packing air pillows
740-587-1040 PA, DO Packing paper Granville Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Goodyear Tire Center 7a-8p M-TH
871 S. 30th St. 7a-6p F
Heath, OH 43056 7a-3p S
740-522-1181 PA, Tire Retailer Tires Newark Area NA Not reported R NA
TCI 7:30a-6p M-F
510 Hebron Rd 7:30a-4p S
Heath, OH 43056 PA, Tire Retailer Tires Heath Area NA Not reported R NA
III-25
740-522-3181
Mr. Tire 8a-5p M-F
68 W. Main St. 8a-1p S
Newark, OH 43055
740) 345-1707 PA, Tire Retailer Tires Newark Area NA Not reported R NA
Mr. Tire 8a-5p M-F
750 Hebron Rd. 8a-1p S
Heath, OH 43056
740-788-9223 PA, Tire Retailer Tires Newark Area NA Not reported R NA
Staples 8a-9p M-S
Toner Cartridges and Cell
Heath, OH 43056
Phones, rechargeable Newark/Heath
740-522-5230 PA, DO at store batteries Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Best Buy 10a-9p M-S
Heath, OH 43056
Toner Cartridges and Cell Newark/Heath
740-522-6606 PA, DO at store Phones, Electronics, Tv's Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Recharge It
293 Stare Rd.
Newark, OH 43055
PA, Cartridge Toner and Ink Jet Newark/Heath By
740-366-2670 Recycler Cartridges (selected types) Area NA appointment Not reported R and C NA
Hope Timber 9a-5p M-F
2135 W. Main St. 10a-2p S
Newark, OH 43055
PA, Pallet Waste Wood and Wood Licking County Not
(740) 522-6558 Reclaimer Pallets and Region NA Not reported C and I Reported
7:30a-9p M-
Advance Auto Parts Uoil S
744 Hebron Rd LAB 9a-8p Sun
Heath, OH 43056
PA, Auto Parts Newark/Heath
740-522-1881 Store Area NA Not reported R and C NA
7:30a-9p M-
Advance Auto Parts PA, Auto Parts Uoil Newark/Heath S
1127 Mt. Vernon Rd. Store LAB Area NA 9a-8p Sun Not reported R and C NA
III-26
Newark, OH 43055
740-366-0040
7:30a-9p M-
Advance Auto Parts Uoil S
123 Broad St. LAB 9a-8p Sun
Pataskala, OH 43062-7516
PA, Auto Parts Pataskala
740-964-5166 Store Area NA Not reported R and C NA
7:30a-10p M-
Auto Zone S
627 Hebron Rd 9a-9p Sun
Heath, OH 43056
740-788-9097 Store Uoil, LAB Area NA Not reported R and C NA
7:30a-10p M-
Auto Zone S
1275 N. 21st St. 9a-9p Sun
Newark, OH 43055
740-366-7770 Store Uoil Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Batteries Unlimited
1830 Hebron Rd.
Heath, OH 43056
Newark/Heath
740-522-4351 PA, DO rechargeable batteries Area NA Not reported R,C, I NA
Salvation Army
250 E. Main St.
Newark, OH 43055
740-345-8120 DO and retail stores household items, furniture Region NA Not reported R and C NA
Goodwill (740) 345-8191 9a-8p M-S
101 Union Street, Newark
noon-5p Sun.
Mt Vernon Rd, Newark
41 Columbus Road, Utica
715 Coshocton Rd., Johnstown
78 Oak Meadow Drive, Pataskala Used clothing, small
DO and retail stores household items, furniture Region NA Not reported R and C NA
Green's Radiator & Air Conditioning PA, Auto Service Uoil Newark/Heath 8a-6p M
6th and Main St Station Anti-Freeze Area NA 8a-1p Sat. Not reported R and C NA
III-27
*gal jugs required no

Newark, OH 43055 buckets*
740-345-3870
Jiffy Lube
836 Hebron Rd.
Heath, OH 43056
PA, Auto Service Newark/Heath
740-522-6822 Station Uoil Area NA 8a-6p M-S Not reported R and C NA
T.D.R.,LLC
200 South West Mink Road
Pataskala, OH 43062
PA, DO, collection 24 hours, 7
740-964-0993 events Electronics, office furniture Region NA days Not reported R, C, I NA
TSC Farm Store 8a-9p M-S
315 Deo Drive 9a-6p S
Newark, OH 43055
PA, Auto/Farm Newark/Heath
740-366-2316 Store Uoil Area NA Not reported R and C NA
Washington Auto Parts
50 S. Fifth St.
Newark, OH 43055
PA, Auto Service Newark/Heath
740-345-9816 Station Uoil, Antifreeze Area NA 8a-6p M-S Not reported R and C NA
Perry County
Goodwill Industries
200 S. Main St.
Perry County Health Dept.
212 S. Main St. LL
Entire Not
Perry County Engineer
2645 Old Somerset Rd. 8a-4p M-F
for MRF; DO
Entire County, Entire - 24 hours, 7 Not
740-342-2191 PA, DO Uoil Region County days a week 4.876 R Reported
III-28
Scrap Yards, Metal Recyclers, End Users

Coshocton County
Coshocton Recycling 8a-4:30p M-F
47359 CR 496 8-noon Sat.
Coshocton, OH 43812
740-622-6276 Scrap Yard Al, Auto,FerM, NonFM Region NA 13,584 R, C, I Not reported
Lity's Scrap Yard 8a-4p M-F
23820 CR 621 8-11:30a Sat.
Canal Lewisville, OH
App, Al, Auto,FerM, NonFM,
740-622-6220 Scrap Yard LAB Region NA Not reported R, C, I Not reported
Skip's Recycling (also listed above
under MRF) 8a-4p M-F
22375 County Rd. 1A Accepts: BrG, ClG, GrG, 8-11:30a Sat.
ONP, OCC, P#1, P#2, StC,
Coshocton, OH 43812 AlC
740-622-9482 Scrap Yard County NA 122 R, C, I Not reported
Walhonding Recycling
20298 Perry Township Rd. 411 Accepts: AlC, FerM,
Walhonding, OH 43843 NonFM, LAB, Auto
740-502-7074 Scrap Yard County NA Not reported R,C,I Not reported
Fairfield County
Fairfield Core and Recycling
233 Whiley Ave.
Lancaster, OH 43130
FerM, NonFM , auto parts,
740-277-7907 Scrap Yard electronics County NA 8a-4p M-F Not reported R, C, I Not reported
Hess Brothers (has since closed)
556 S. Columbus St. FerM, NonFM from
commercial and industrial
Lancaster, OH 43130
sources, NonFM from
740-654-3685 Scrap Yard residential customers County NA 8a-4p M-F 326.57 R, C, I Not reported
Hines Scrap Iron Automobiles 9a-5p M-F
7005 Hopewell Church Rd. Scrap Yard larger heavier metal Region NA 9a-3p S Not reported R, C, I Not reported
III-29
Lancaster, Oh 43130
740-969-2014
Hines Scrap Iron 9a-5p M-F
2894 Clearcreek Rd. 9a-3p S
Lancaster, OH 43130
740-969-3121 Scrap Yard FerM, NonFM Region NA Not reported R, C, I Not reported
8:30a-4p
Lancaster Metals Recycling M,T,W,F
8:30a-12 Th
204 E Locust Street and Sat.
Lancaster, Ohio 43130
740- 653-6253 Scrap Yard NonFM Region NA Not reported R, C, I Not reported
Ohio Paperboard Corp.
310 West Water St.
By
Baltimore, OH 43105-1072
End User of arrangement
740-862-4167 recycled feed stock OCC, OffP, MxP Region NA only Not reported C, I Not reported
Sierra Metals
224 Cedar Hill Road FerM, NonFM, Electronic- 9a-5p M-F
fee for electronics from (Commercial
Lancaster, OH
commercial and industrial and industrial
740-653-8765 Scrap Yard sources only Region NA customers) Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Licking County Not reported
Crispin Auto Wrecking 8a-5p M-F
8a-12 noon
629 New Haven Ave. Sat.
Newark, OH 43055
App, AlC, FerM, LAB,
740-345-4730 Scrap Yard NonFM, StC, Elec Region NA 7,128.40 R,C, I Not reported
Sherman Iron & Metal
1001 E. Main St.
Newark, OH 43055
740-344-4620 Scrap FerM, NonFM Newark Area NA ?? Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Johnson Appliance Sales and Service Retail Store App Newark Area NA ?? Not reported R,C, I Not reported
230 E. Main St.
Newark, OH 43055
III-30
740-349-0595
Mr. B's Appliance & Repair Retail Store App Newark Area NA Not reported 5 R,C, I Not reported
114 Union St.
Newark, OH 43055
740-344-1611
NonFM, LAB, catalytic
Legend Metals Scrap Yard converters Region NA 8a-5p M-F 1740 R,C, I Not reported
923 Buckeye Ave. 9a-4p Sat.
Newark, OH 43055
740-344-2387
Strategic Materials
101 South Arch Street
Newark, OH 43055
End User - M-F 7 am -
Ph: (740) 349-9523 Processor Glass-container and window Region NA 4:30 pm 373 R, C, I Not reported
Environmental Specialists, Inc.
by
Heath, OH 43056
appointment
740-404-6209 MRF HHW Region NA only Not reported R, C, I Not reported
Perry County Not reported
Perry Scrapyard
4161 St. Rt. 13 NE
AlC, FerM, LAB, NonFM,
740-891-7184 Scrap Yard Sc, Electronics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Plastics Regrinders
3151 Cooperriders Rd. NW
740-659-2346 processor plastics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Hauler Recycling - Multi County

Residential curbside - see
Big 'O' Refuse Table III-4 Commercial
and industrial Commercial
Commercial and industrial recycling in all and industrial
229 Dayton Rd. NE Hauler collection OCC and other materials by of Licking NA NA not reported Not reported Not reported
III-31
arrangement County,
northern
Fairfield and
Newark, OH 43055 Perry
Counties.
Residential -
740-344-7544 see Table III-4
Commercial
Republic Services, Inc. and industrial
933 Frank Road in Coshocton,
Commercial and industrial Fairfield,
Columbus, OH 43223 recycling of corrugated Licking and
cardboard, ferrous and non- Perry
ferrous metals, and other Counties with
materials (depending on exception of
amounts to be recycled and southern Perry
614-308-3000 Hauler collection market conditions) County. NA NA Not reported C and I Not reported
Rumpke (division of Rumpke

Consolidated Companies)
Residential curbside listed
Columbus/Circleville Area in Table III-4. Commercial
1191 Fields Avenue and industrial recycling of
corrugated cardboard,
Columbus, OH 43201 ferrous and non-ferrous
metals, and other materials
(depending on amounts to
be recycled and market Licking and R, C, I
conditions) offered in entire Fairfield percentages
888-786-7531 Hauler collection service area. Counties NA NA 91.8 not reported Not reported
1006 Walnut Street
Residential curbside listed
in Table III-4. Commercial
800-343-6047 and industrial recycling of
ferrous and non-ferrous All four
metals, and other materials counties with
(depending on amounts to exception of
be recycled and market southern most R, C, I
conditions) offered in entire part of Perry percentages
Hauler collection service area. County NA NA 3392.19 not reported Not reported
Hauler Recycling - Fairfield County
Farmer's Refuse Hauler Recycling OCC Fairfield Not NA 156.28 R,C, I Not reported
III-32
Collection County reported

outside of
Lancaster, OH. Lancaster
Hauler Recycling - Licking County

Junk 2B
Newark, OH 43055
Hauler Recycling entire
Collection OCC Entire County county NA 25.5 R,C, I Not reported
Multi County and Outside of District Recyclers, End Users, Scrap Yards and Material Recovery Facilities used by the District
Outside the District
Ohio Computer Recycling at Ohio Mulch
7765 Refugee Rd.
Pickerington, OH 43147
614-833-6160 PA, DO electronics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Polk Scrap Iron & Metal
1900 W Main Street,
Zanesville, OH 43701 PA, Scrap Yard, 8a to 4:30p
740-452-4174 Broker FerM, NonFM, LAB, App Region NA M-F Not reported R,C, I Not reported
I.H. Schlezinger
1041 Joyce Ave
FerM, NonFM, AlC,
Columbus, Ohio 43201
PA, Scrap Yard, StC,automotive radiators, M-F 7:30 am
614-252-1188 Broker stainless steel Region NA 4:30 pm Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Muskingum Iron & Metal
345 Arthur St.
Zanesville, OH 43701
PA, Scrap Yard, 8a to 4:30p
740-452-9351 Broker FerM, NonFM Region NA M-F Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Rumpke Recycling Material Recovery
Facility Processing
1191 Fields Avenue facility, not
AlC, BrG, CLG, Mag, MxP, open to
NP, OCC, PB, PhB, P#1- general
614-421-0032 MRF #7,StC Region NA public Not reported R,C, I Not reported
III-33
Waste Management, Inc. Material

Recovery Facility Processing
1006 Walnut Street facility, not
AlC, BrG, CLG, Mag, MxP, open to
NP, OCC, PB, PhB, P#1- general
800-343-6047 MRF #7,StC Region NA public 501.45 R,C, I Not reported
Environmental Enterprises, Inc.
1249 Essex Ave.
W-F 7 am-
614-294-1300 PA, MRF HHW Region NA 4:30 pm Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Zanesville Pallet
2235 Licking Rd.
Wood, Occ, stretch film
740-454-3700 Scrap Yard, Broker plastic Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
S. Slesnick Co.
700 3rd St. SE
Canton, OH 44707
FerM, NonFM, OffP, OCC,
330-454-5101 Scrap Yard, Broker plastics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Royal Paper
1300 Norton Rd.
OffP, OCC, #1-6 plastics,
614-851-4714 Scrap Yard, Broker AlC, NonFM, FerM Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Shred-It
1370 Research Rd.
Gahanna, OH 43230
M-F, 9 am-4
614-398-3140 Scrap Yard, Broker OffP Region NA pm Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Premier Pallets
11361 Lawndell Rd. SW
Navarre, OH 44662
330-767-2221 Scrap Yard, Broker Wood Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Research Alloys
799 W. Goodale Blvd. M-F 8am-
Columbus, OH 43212 Scrap Yard, Broker FerM, NonFM Region NA 4:30 pm Not reported R,C, I Not reported
III-34
614-224-4404
Harmon Paper Recycling & GP Harmon
Jericho, NY
216-533-8269 Broker OffP, OCC, plastics Region NA Sat 8-noon Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Cresset Powers LTD
8720 Rochester Ave.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
909-476-2700 Broker Plastic Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Masser Metals
3103 Lamb Ave.
614-471-3195 Scrap Yard, Broker FerM, NonFM Region NA M-F 8-4:30 Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Northstar Recyclers
94 Maple St.
East Longmeadow, MA 01028
OffP, OCC, FerM, NonFM,
413-263-6010 Scrap Yard, Broker Plastics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Buckeye Diamond
15 Sprague Rd.
South Charleston, OH 45368
800-782-7517 Scrap Yard, Broker Wood pallets Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Montgomery Paper Co.
400 E. 4th St.
Dayton, OH 45402
937-222-4059 Scrap Yard, Broker OffP, OCC, Plastics Region NA Not reported R,C, I Not reported
Campbell Scrap Tire Co.
2485 Maysville Pike
740-455-7470 MRF tires Region NA 1250.098 R,C, I Not reported
Cleveland Transfer - WM
7450 Oakleaf Rd.
Oakwood Village, OH 44146 Xfer Station commingled Region NA 0.46 R,C, I Not reported
III-35
440-201-1123
Kimble Transfer & Recycling-Canton
2295 Bolivar Rd. SW
Canton, OH 44707
330-343-1226 Xfer Station commingled Region NA 161.29 R,C, I Not reported
Chillicothe Transfer - WM
990 Eastern Ave.
Chillicothe, OH 45601
513-851-0122 Xfer Station commingled Region NA 2.94 R,C, I Not reported
Harris & Associates
2147 Stabler Rd.
Akron, OH 44313
Perrysville Iron Metal & Tire
8025 Dial Rd.
Bowerston, OH 44695
Discount Tire Transport LTD
2753 Westbelt Dr.
Columbus, OH43228
Lightner Tire Co
780 E. Waterloo Rd.
Akron, OH 44313
R. Willig Tire Distributions Inc.
1955 Firestone Pkwy
Akron, OH 44313
330-658-2642 MRF tires Region NA 201 R,C, I Not reported
Sundown Tire Recycling
1013 Happy Hollow Rd.
Piketon, OH 45661 MRF tires Region NA 59.18 R,C, I Not reported
III-36
740-947-4053
Entech
10440 CR 2
Middlebury, IN 46540
Rumpke Transportation Company, LLC
10795 Hughes Rd.
Cincinnati, OH 45251
Liberty Tire
3021 Jackson Pike
Grove City, OH 43123
M-F 8 am-4
614-871-8097 MRF tires Region NA pm 1749.57 R,C, I Not reported
III-37
Table III-6 Composting Facilities Used by the District
Facility Name or Activity Material

Received Non-
Address
from SWMD Processing compostables Compost Produced
Telephone Facility Type Location (Tons) Capacity Landfilled (TPY)
Lancaster WPCF Class IV
1110 Lawrence Street (not available to the public)
Lancaster, OH 43130 23-C4R-0610
740-687-6668 Fairfield County 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Micro Construction LLC/Micro Roll-off
Containers Class IV
8675 Newark-Lancaster Rd (not available to the public)
Baltimore, OH 43105 23-C4R-0988
740-862-0751 Fairfield County 0 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Pine Grove Landfill Class IV
5131 Drinkle Road (Publicly available)
Amanda, OH 43102 23-C4R-0812
740-969-4487 Fairfield County 44.52 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Southeastern Correctional Institute Class II
5900 B.I.S. Rd. (not available to the public)
Lancaster, OH 43130 23-C2R-1107
740-653-4324 Fairfield County 554.71 Not reported Not reported Not reported
The Compost Farm Class III
7795 Jersey Mills Road (Publicly available)
Alexandria, OH 43001 45-C3R-0836
740-924-4202 Licking County 386.3 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Elm Recycling Class IV
1242 Mt. Vernon Road (publicly available)
Newark, OH 43055 also CD&D recycling Licking County 16,349.33 Not reported Not reported Not reported
III-38
740-366-3340 45-C4R-0980
Hope Timber Mulch Class IV
2135 W Main Street (Publicly available)
Newark, OH 43055 45-C4R-0939
740-344-1788 Licking County 4000 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Licking Rural Electrification -
Maintenance Facility Class IV
11339t. Vernon Road (not available to the public)
Utica, OH 43080 CLOSED IN 2012
740-348-1203 45-C4R-0897 Licking County Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported
Utica Compost Facility Class IV
418 Blacksnake Road (Available to residents of Utica)
Utica, OH 43080 45-C4R-0084
740-892-2696 Licking County 250.67 Not reported Not reported Not reported
Denison University Class II
1205 N. Pearl St. (not available to the public)
Granville, OH 43023 45-C2R-1086
Kurtz Brothers-Brookside Class IV
2409 Johnstown-Alexandria Rd. (publicly available)
Alexandria, OH 43001 45-C4R-1114
Ohio Fresh Eggs Exempted Class III
11492 Wesley Chapel Rd. (not available to the public)
Croton, OH 45-C3R-1127
Perry Co. Engineer Class IV
2645 Old Somerset Road (Publicly available)
New Lexington, OH 43764 closed in 2013
740-342-2191 64-C4R-0612 Perry County 207 Not reported Not reported Not reported
III-39
Table III-7 Omitted Landfills Used by the District Outside of the State of Ohio - None used in the reference year.
Table III-8 Open Dumps and Waste Tire Dumps
Description of Material Dumped Approximate Size

Site Description and Location Land Owner and Address on Site in Acres Time Period Site has Existed
Coshocton County
Rebecca A. Terrell Court Ordered Clean Up. Bank owns
54442 Hickory Flats Dr. House. On-going complaints 2012. Waiting
54442 Hickory Flats Dr., West Lafayette West Lafayette, Ohio Solid Waste, Housing Nuisance Not reported for new ownership
John Rohn
32848 SR 93 Trash, old trailers, and solid Court ordered clean up as of 5/09,
32848 SR 93, Baltic Baltic, OH 43804 waste Not reported Overlooking Property
Willis Pigman
1403 Pleasant Valley DR. Solid Waste, Housing Nuisance, Since 2011. Sanitarian orders, Board
1403 Pleasant Valley Dr., Coshocton Coshocton, Ohio Trash Not reported Orders. In Progress.
Glen Langdon
34117 TR 363 Board of Health orders issued as of 5/09,
34117 TR 363, Warsaw Warsaw, OH 43844 Trash, garbage, junk, scrap tires Not reported still Overseeing Property.
Basil Lanham
36453 CR 70 Large Pile 15' 2' to 3' high. Trash, Sanitarian clean up orders January 2012.
36453 CR 70, Warsaw (back yard) Warsaw, OH 43844 solid waste Not reported Over sight of property.
Fairfield County
Larry Moore
3330 Hamburg Road
Large accumulation of solid BOH sent matter to prosecution, OEPA sent
3330 Hamburg Road, Lancaster Lancaster, Ohio 43130 waste and tires 1 acre orders to remove tires as well
Bill Zigler, Crystal Laughbaum Large accumulation of solid

6325 Crooks Road, Lancaster 6325 Crooks Road waste dumped in foundation of <1 acre Board of Health orders issued as of 4/13
III-40
Lancaster, Ohio 43130 old razed building next to house

Licking County
Legend Orchards
11200 Reynolds Road
11200 Reynolds Road, Utica Utica. OH 3,500 to 4,000 tires Not reported Cleanup 50% complete
Perry County
Township Road 319 in Pleasant Township Reoccurring dumpsite where
Section 20, on the east side of the road Not identified general trash is dumped > 1 acre Unknown
Township Road 239 in Bearfield
Township, Section 27, about 1/4 mile
from public road on the east side of the
road John Hogan Tires 300 to 400 tires Unknown
Wayne National Forest, Monroe TR 11 at
Irish Ridge Rd. Not identified > 500 Unknown
Table III-9 Ash, Foundry Sand, and Slag Disposal Sites Used by the District
Description of
Approximate Time Period Site
Site Location Land Owner and Address Material Dumped
Size of Site has been Used
on the Site
SanCast, Inc.
535 Clow Lane
535 Clow Lane Foundry Sand Pre 1991
Coshocton, OH
Coshocton, OH 43812
Newark Processing
160 Everett Avenue
160 Everett Avenue Slag Pre 1991
Newark, OH
Newark, OH 43055
III-41
Table III-10 Solid Waste Haulers Operating in the District
Types of
Materials Tons
Name of Company Mailing Address, Phone Description of Collection Routes Collected Collected Facilities Used
Multi County
3473 Ruble Park Lane Fairfield, Perry and Licking County outside of
Lancaster, OH 43130 city limits. Residential on a regular route; Roll Utilizes 14 landfills and
BSS Waste 740-756-9100 off containers R, C Not reported transfer stations
229 Dayton Rd. NE Residential, commercial and industrial waste
collection in all of Licking County, northern
Newark, OH 43055 Fairfield and Perry Counties, city of Coshocton.
Residential, commercial and industrial recycling
Big 'O' Refuse 740-345-2086 see Tables III-4 and III-5 R, C, I Not reported Tunnell Hill Landfill
3596 State Route 39 NW provided trash and curbside recycling to
Dover, OH 44622 Coshocton until mid-2012, subscription to rest
J & J Refuse 330-343-5665 of county plus Licking R, C, I Not reported Kimball landfill/ Dover
933 Frank Road Residential, commercial and industrial in
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Counties
Columbus, OH 43223 with exception of southern Perry County.
Residential, commercial and industrial recycling
Republic Services, Inc. 614-308-3000 see Tables III-4 and III-5 R, C, I Not reported Pine Grove Landfill
Licking and Fairfield Counties. Residential
Rumpke (division of Rumpke Consolidated
waste collection contracts in Pickerington, Utica
Companies) 1191 Fields Avenue
Village, Etna Township, Jersey Township, and
Columbus/Circleville Area Columbus, OH 43201 Liberty Township. Subscription curbside Rumpke Transfer
recycling offered in Pickerington and Etna Facility in Circleville,
888-786-7531 Township. R, C, I Not reported Beech Hollow Landfill
1006 Walnut Street
Canal Winchester, OH 43110 All four counties with exception of southern Suburban South R & D
Waste Management, Inc. 800-343-6047 most part of Perry County. R, C, I Not reported Facility
Coshocton
23034 TR 409 western portion of Coshocton County and
Warsaw, OH 43844 eastern part of Licking County, weekly or bi-
All J Hauling 740-327-6285 weekly residential collection R Not reported Coshocton Landfill
P.O. Box 1202 Entire County, weekly or bi-weekly residential
Bud's Refuse Coshocton, OH 43812 collection R Not reported Coshocton Landfill
III-42
740-622-2414
59831 CR 9
Newcomerstown, OH 438`32
CBS 740-498-8372
603 Buckeye St.
Coshocton, OH 43812
Coshocton Trucking 740-622-1311 No collection routes, hauls sand for foundry I Not reported Not reported
60180 Everals Church Rd.
Newcomerstown, OH 43832
Myers Refuse 740-498-4710 R, C Not reported
5240 Narrows Rd.
Frazeysburg, OH 43822
Professional Trash Service 740-828-9200 R, C, I Not reported Kimball landfill/ Dover
135 Main St.
P.O. Box 136
Warsaw, OH 43844
Ridenbaugh Hauling 740-824-4224 Now out of business R Not reported Coshocton Landfill
P.O. Box 101
Warsaw, OH 43844
Skip's Refuse 740-824-3827 Coshocton County outside of Coshocton City R,C, I Not reported Coshocton Landfill
P.O. Box 555
Stowers Disposal 740-498-6096 Now out of business Not reported
964 E. State St., PO Box 185
Whetstone Hauling 740-498-6341 No response Not reported
Fairfield
2115 Belhorn Rd.
Amanda, OH 43102
Southwestern part of Fairfield County. Lancaster Transfer,
AJW Sanitation 740-243-7351 Residential only of a weekly or bi-weekly basis. R Not reported Pine Grove Landfill
III-43
695 McKinley Ave.

Newark, OH 43055 northern Fairfield, southern Licking,
CMI Waste Removal 740-364-0055 northwestern Perry Counties. R Not reported
207 E. Main St.
Tarlton, OH 43156 Provides service to customers in Stoutsville, Rumpke Transfer
D & D Refuse 740-474-3001 Amanda and Tarlton R Not reported Facility in Circleville
2019 Stoneridge Rd.
Circleville, OH 43113 Rumpke Transfer
Elsea, Inc. 740-420-2740 Rustic Ridge Mobil Home Park- only R Not reported Facility in Circleville
7617 E. Grubb Rd. NE
Athens/Hocking
Thornville, OH 43076
Provides service to all of Fairfield and Perry Approx 2,300 Landfill, Tunnell Hill
Falcon Sanitation 740-536-7647 Counties R, C tons Landfill
1952 Linton Rd.
Logan, OH 43138
Farmers Refuse and Trucking 740-385-7228 Southwest of Lancaster- Sugargrove R,C,I Not reported Rumpke-Circleville
11501 Woodbridge Lane
Baltimore, OH 43105 Lancaster Transfer,
Garrison Company Hauling 614-444-4285 Entire County except City of Lancaster R,C, I No reporting Pine Grove Landfill
329 S. Columbus St.
Lancaster, OH 43130 Lancaster Transfer,
JNR Services 740-654-9832 Entire County except City of Lancaster R,C No reporting Pine Grove Landfill
743 Ewing St.
Lancaster, OH 43130 Municipal Waste Collection-weekly for city of Under contract w/ Pine
Lancaster City Sanitation 740-687-6660 Lancaster R, C Not reported Grove
1300 S. Columbus Airport Rd.
Columbus, OH 43207
Local Waste Services 740-409-9375 Carroll and Pleasantville R, C Not reported Tunnell Hill Landfill
Micro Construction 8675 Lancaster-Newark Rd. Fairfield and Licking Counties. C, I Not reported
Baltimore, OH 43105 No residential- only roll off for construction,
740-862-0751 commercial, demolition Micro Construction
8495 Chillicothe-Lancaster Rd.
No Better Kontainer Service Amanda, OH 43102 No response Not reported
III-44
937-414-0173
7164 Pleasantview Rd. SE
Bremen, OH 43107
Old Mill Sanitation 740-569-1323 No response Not reported
11635 Summerland Beach Rd.
Millersport, OH
Serves all of county, primarily roll-off service. Lancaster Transfer,
Roshon Hauling 740-808-1199 No regular routes R,C,I Not reported Pine Grove Landfill
14501 Old McArthur Rd.
Logan, OH 43138
740-385-6951
Trace's A-1 Sanitation, Inc. No response C Not reported
Licking
P.O. Box 3053
Dublin, OH 43016
1-800-Got Junk? 614-499-3462
947 E. Johnstown Rd., #103
Gahanna, OH, 43230
AAA Affordable Services 614-476-3626 Not reported
55 Sandalwood Dr.
Serves all of county- Newark, Heath,
Newark, OH 43055-9232 Johnstown, Utica. Commercial roll-offs only. No
All Purpose Containers 740-403-0048 residential routes. C, I Not reported Suburban Landfill
2210 Ryan Rd.
Newark, OH 43055
C.D. Roberts Company 740-522-8323 Not reported
321 Dering Ave.
Columbus, OH 43207
Capitol Waste & Recycling Services, LLC 614-445-9900 Fairfield and Licking Counties. C Not reported
2322 Buttermilk Rd.
Delaware, OH 43015
Cyrus Construction 740-595-9680 No collection routes C Not reported Not reported
Econo Haul 645 Oakland Park Ave No collection routes C Not reported Not reported
III-45
Columbus, OH 43214
614-263-8000
5501 Westerville Rd., PO Box 157

Westerville, OH 43086
Global Container Services, Inc 614-882-0361 Not reported
161 Poplar Ave
Newark, OH 43055-4947
Serves all of county, one time pick-up by Recycling
Junk 2B 740-345-1162 appointment, no routes R, C reported Not reported
6741 North Street Rd. NW
Newark, OH 43055
C,D & D
KMA Services 740-587-0565 C, D & D only only Not reported Not reported
565 Pinehurst Ct.
Newark, OH 43055
Not
Layton Trucking 740-404-3643 Serves all of county reported Not reported Not reported
3441 Sportsman Club Rd.
Johnstown, OH 43031
Nuway Services 740-587-2451 No response Not reported
148 Squire Lane
Hebron, OH 43025
Seneca Management Corp. 740-475-9975 Not reported
PO Box 4696
Newark, OH 43058-4696
Shackleford Disposal 740-366-0001 Entire county R, Not reported
1001 E. Main St.
Newark, OH 43055
Sherman's Container Service 740-345-8994 Not reported
52 Bates St.
Newark, OH 43055
Serves all of county, primarily Newark, roll-off
Smith Roll off Containers 740-323-4410 only R, C Not reported Suburban Landfill
Steve's Hauling 3531 Mason Rd. Not reported
III-46

740-385-6951
132 S. 30th St., Suite B
Newark, OH 43055
Waste Away Systems 614-833-9128 Licking County R, Not reported Suburban Landfill
Perry
12140 Rosefarm Rd. NW
Crooksville, OH 43731 Estimated
BA Disposal 740-982-8540 Crooksville by contract R, C 1,200 tons Tunnel Hill Landfill
5525 4th St.
Roseville, OH 43777
Boyd's Sanitation 740-697-7940 No response Not reported
PO Box 216
Dutiel Rental Properties 740-342-1814 Not reported
3790 Boggs Rd.
Hanna Disposal 740-586-3503 no longer hauling as of end of 2013 Not reported
7616 TWP Rd. 257
Shawnee, OH 43782
Leckrone Sanitation 740-394-2032 Serves 90% of county R, C Not reported Not reported
36000 Vickers Rd.
Union Furnace, OH 43158
Michel's Refuse 740-385-0504 Not reported
2235 SR 13 NE
Perco Inc. 740-342-5156 Recycling only. Recycling NA NA
303 Court St.
Junction City, OH 43746
R & R Waste Begone 740-987-2070 Not reported
2849 Pinkerton Rd.
Rock's Hauling & Refuse 740-819-7140 Not reported
III-47
482 Zanesville Ave.

Logan OH 43138
Southern Ohio Disposal 740-385-8101 Not reported
PO Box 70
Logan, OH 43138
Vickroy's Disposal 740-385-0504 Not reported
III-48
IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction [ORC
Section 3734.53(A)(5)-(6)
A. Reference Year Population and Residential/Commercial Waste Generation
The District population was calculated using baseline data from the 2010 census plus the projected
increases or decreases in populations for Ohio counties as published by the Ohio Development
Services Agency, Office of Policy, Research and Strategic Planning. 1
Ohio’s solid waste law states that when a municipal corporation is located in more than one solid
waste district, the entire corporation is to be included in the jurisdiction of the solid waste district
where the majority of the population resides. As a result of this requirement, the District population
has been adjusted to exclude the residents of Baltic that live in Coshocton County, residents of
Columbus, Canal Winchester, and Reynoldsburg that live in Fairfield County, and the residents of
Reynoldsburg and New Albany that live in Licking County. The residents of these three municipalities
are included in the Stark-Tuscarawas-Wayne Solid Waste District and Solid Waste Authority of
Central Ohio (Franklin County). The entire population of Gratiot, Lithopolis, Pickerington, Roseville
and Utica are included in the District even though some residents of these municipalities reside in
adjoining counties.
1
Ohio Development Services Agency, Office of Research, 2010 to 2040 Projected Population
for Ohio Counties.
IV-1
Table IV-1 Reference Year Population
Generation Rate Total District Res/Com

County Population (lbs/person/day) Generation (TPY)
Before After
Adjustment Adjustment
Coshocton County 36,801

Less part of Baltic -10
Adjusted Total 36,791 5.81 38,978
Fairfield County 150,182
Plus part of Pickerington 88
Plus part of Lithopolis 33
Less part of Canal Winchester -837
Less part of Columbus -9,932
Less part of Reynoldsburg -935
Adjusted Total 138,598 5.81 146,839
Licking County 169,303
Plus part of Gratiot 89
Plus part of Utica 16
Less part of Reynoldsburg -8,975
Less part of New Albany -23
Adjusted Total 160,411 5.81 169,948
Perry County 36,375
Plus part of Roseville 762
Adjusted Total 37,136 5.81 39,344
Total District Population after Adjustments 372,936 395,109
Note: Numbers do not precisely add up due to rounding.
Calculating Residential/Commercial Waste Generation Using Reported Numbers
In this Plan, as in previous CFLP District Plans, we calculate the residential/commercial waste
generation in the reference year by adding the amount of waste sent for disposal to the amount of
waste reported as recycled. 2 This method of calculation has consistently resulted in comparable
generation rates for the CFLP District. The rate has averaged 6.37 pounds per person per day for the
last fifteen years.
2 See the Residential/Commercial Recycling Table in Appendix F for details regarding the source of this data and the
adjustments that were made between the time the amount of recycling was reported in the District’s 2012 Annual
District Report to Ohio EPA and the preparation of this plan.
IV-2
Table IV - 2 Reference Year Residential/Commercial Generation

Using Actual Disposal and Reported Recycling
Waste/Recycling Data Source Tons in 2012

District General waste reported by transfer facilities (Table III-3.) 91,419
District General waste reported by landfills (Table III-1.) 188,505
Total residential/commercial disposal (includes "other") 279,924
Residential/commercial recycling and yard waste composting 115,182
Residential waste reduction 3
Total residential/commercial waste generation 395,109
Total residential/commercial waste generation as lbs./person/day 5.81
Generation rate calculation: 395,109 x 2000 lbs_______ = 5.81

372,936 population x 365 days
B. Industrial Waste Generation
In January 2013, an industrial waste and recycling survey covering calendar year 2012 was sent to
all industries (SIC 20,22-39) in the four counties. A copy of the industrial survey and a table
showing the 2012 survey results including the reported disposal and recycling by materials type is
included in Appendix F. Survey results were used from previous years for non-responding industries
if the industries had reported previously and were still active in 2012.
The District Solid Waste Management Plan Format, Appendix JJ instructs districts to report
manufacturers who fall within the Standard Industrial Classification categories of 20 and 22-39 as
generators of industrial waste. However, per OEPA instructions, we report certain other businesses
as industrial rather than commercial so that consistency with past plans is maintained. Therefore,
Ohio Fresh Eggs (SIC #0200) and AEP's Conesville Power Plant (SIC #6600) are categorized as
industrial even though they are outside the SIC categories set forth in the Format for industrial
generators.
Calculating Industrial Waste Generation
For this Plan Update as in previous plan updates, the District will use the industrial waste generation
rate that is calculated by adding the amount of reported waste disposal to the amount of reported
recycling because it reflects the most accurate portrayal of waste generation in the district (Table IV-
3B.).
IV-3
Table IV-3A Industrial Waste Generation Based on Reported Disposal and Recycling
Waste Data Source Tons in 2012

District waste reported by transfer facilities (Table III-3.) 10
District waste reported by landfills (Table III-1.) 767,408
Industrial recycling 637,523
Reported total industrial waste generation 1,404,941
Total industrial waste generation (lbs./person/day) 20.64
Generation rate calculation: 1,404,941 x 2000 lbs_______ = 20.64

A full 61% of the industrial waste generated is FGD material from the AEP Conesville Power Plant
that is disposed in their captive facility or recycled in special projects. Although not a required table,
Table IV-3.C excludes this waste stream to illustrate what the industrial waste generation would be
without this waste stream.
Table IV-3B. Industrial Waste Generation Based on Reported Disposal and Recycling
Exclusive of FGD Material from the AEP Conesville Power Plant
Waste Data Source Tons in 2012

District waste reported by transfer facilities (Table III-3.) 10
District waste reported by landfills (Table III-1.) 121,866
Industrial recycling 425,965
Reported total industrial waste generation 547,841
Total industrial waste generation (lbs./person/day) excluding FGD
from Conesville 8.05
Generation rate calculation: 547,841 x 2000 lbs_______ = 8.05

IV-4
Table IV-3C. Industrial Waste Generation Survey Respondents vs Non-Respondents
Survey Respondents Amounts Based on Secondary Data (Non-reporting)

Total
Standard Generation Generation
# of # of Tons of Industrial
Industrial # of Tons of Waste Rate (per # of Rate (per
Indus- Indus- Waste Waste
Classification Employees Generated employee Employees employee
tries tries Generated Generation
per year) per year)
200 1 650 11,344.00 17.45 0 0 0 17.45 11,344.00
2000 12 1,228 34,642.46 28.21 13 200 5,642.09 28.21 40,284.55
2200 4 51 170.73 3.35 1 10 33.48 3.35 204.20
2300 10 433 435.60 1.01 10 71 71.43 1.01 507.03
2400 15 1,044 36,356.44 34.82 14 61 2,124.27 34.82 38,480.71
2500 1 6 6.00 1.00 4 19 19.00 1.00 25.00
2600 9 673 91,388.16 135.79 1 21 2,851.64 135.79 94,239.80
2700 31 1,170 11,638.59 9.95 28 128 1,273.28 9.95 12,911.88
2800 5 230 36,250.41 157.61 11 120 18,913.26 157.61 55,163.67
2900 4 414 211.59 0.51 3 14 7.16 0.51 218.74
3000 15 1,116 19,158 17.17 7 134 2,300.29 17.17 21,457.90
3100 1 3 2.00 0.67 1 100 66.67 0.67 68.67
3200 21 2,489 89,743.37 36.06 10 69 2,487.86 36.06 92,231.23
3300 5 1,313 85,742.62 65.30 3 212 13,844.20 65.30 99,586.82
3400 33 1,651 18,073.06 10.95 19 127 1,390.24 10.95 19,463.30
3500 34 462 957.93 2.07 24 170 352.48 2.07 1,310.41
3600 5 559 1,430.79 2.56 12 198 506.79 2.56 1,937.58
3700 6 733 3,768.13 5.14 7 42 215.91 5.14 3,984.03
3800 6 527 1,029.49 1.95 7 15 29.30 1.95 1,058.79
3900 12 241 27.59 0.11 21 58 6.64 0.11 34.23
6600 1 315 879,116.63 2,790.85 0 0 0.00 741.51 879,116.63
TOTALS 231 15,308 1,321,493.19 86.33 196 1,769 52,135.98 29.47 1,373,629.17
IV-5
C. Exempt Waste
The information about the amount of exempt waste sent for disposal comes from the facility data
information submitted to Ohio EPA in Landfill and Transfer Annual Operating Reports. Publicly available
disposal facilities reported receiving 17,588 tons of exempt waste and 9,215 tons of construction and
demolition debris from the District in 2012. We do not have sufficient information on which to
categorize the 17,588 tons of exempt waste. In addition, AEP reported disposing of 354,228 tons of
by-products of coal combustion in the captive landfill owned and operated by AEP for the disposal of
combustion waste from the company’s Conesville Power Plant. These materials are specifically
excluded from the definition of solid waste and according to the 2009 State Solid Waste Management
Plan, are not included in the solid waste generation, disposal or recycling figures. The amount is shown
in Table IV-4 to provide a total picture for the district, but consistent with the state plan and OEPA
Format instruction, that amount is not included in the calculation of total Exempt Waste generated in
the District.
Table IV-4. Exempt Waste Generated in District
Generation Rate Total Exempt Waste

Type or source of waste
(lbs/person/day) Generation (TPY)
Coal combustion waste
from electric power 5.20 354,288
generation
CD/D 0.14 9,219
Uncharacterized 0.26 17,588
Total .39 26,807
D. Total Waste Generation
The total waste generation that will be used for the reference year for this Plan is shown on Table IV-5.
Table IV-5. Reference Year Total Waste Generation
Generation Rate Total Waste Generation

Type of Waste
(lbs/person/day) (TPY)
Residential/Commercial 5.81 395,109
Industrial 20.64 1,404,941
Exempt 0.39 26,807
Total Waste Generation 26.84 1,826,857
IV-6
E. Reference Year Waste Reduction
1. Residential/Commercial Waste Reduction
Table IV-6 lists the documented recycling of residential/commercial waste in the District in the reference
year 2012. Annual surveys were sent to municipalities, townships, private recyclers, private haulers, and
composters. Information supplied by Ohio EPA was used for facilities that did not return a district survey
(such as retail stores and tire processors). Surveys requested information on where the recyclables were
marketed and broke out residential/commercial from industrial. Materials were counted when possible
only at the first place of collection or processing. Marketing information was not provided in the OEPA
data provided to districts, so although it is not likely that materials were double counted from those
entities, it cannot be guaranteed.
Waste reduction and recycling activities in the district that contributed to the tonnages itemized on
Table IV-6 are fully described in Appendix G. Each program is discussed and reviewed for strengths and
weaknesses, and the following information is provided: entity responsible for maintaining the program,
service area which benefits, amount and type of material recycled, and all assumptions associated with
future projections of quantities recycled.
In general, recycling of the residential and commercial waste stream is a result of many different
activities. District funds are focused on providing full serve residential drop-off locations to supplement
private sector services such as curbside and business accounts. Yard waste composting facilities
normally handle much less material than they did in 2012 when a powerful storm hit the area and
created an abnormal amount of debris.
2. Industrial Recycling
Table IV-7, which is organized by grouping the types of material recycled, lists all of the reported
industrial recycling in the reference year. Appendix G details the District programs to reduce industrial
waste in the reference year. Larger industries often assign employees to plan, implement and monitor
recycling programs, however the District has a number of small industries that cannot devote personnel
to this task. The District's role in industrial waste reduction is to facilitate sharing of information,
assisting with waste audits, promoting available waste exchanges and identifying potential markets for
waste materials.
The mandatory inclusion of FGD material from the Conesville Power Plant in both recycling and
generation of industrial waste - even though it is disposed solely in AEP's captive landfill, presents a
challenge that is shared by only three solid waste management districts in Ohio.
FGD material constituted 61% of all industrial waste generated within the District in the reference year,
and 33% of industrial recycling. However, the recycling rate for industrial waste was only 45%, well
below the mandatory goal of 66%. Even if recycling for all other industries were 100%, if no recycling of
FGD material occurred, the overall industrial recycling percentage would only be 39%. This illustrates
that the District cannot reach the State percentage goal without a new expanded market for FGD
material.
If FGD material were more amenable to recycling, it's inclusion could be beneficial to the recycling rate.
IV-7
However, it has physical limitations that currently preclude more recycling. Its similarity to wet cement
limits the distance it can be transported before it is unusable. Annual tons recycled is dependent on
the number of local projects that present themselves and fluctuates widely from year to year.
Therefore, to maintain compliance with state mandates, this District has no alternative than to continue
pursuit of the access goal.
IV-8
Table IV-6 Reference Year Residential/Commercial Waste Reduction in the District

Net Waste
Tons Recycled District- Total Waste Processed
in Reference funded Collection Private Yard Waste Institutional Received for Residual via
Type of Waste Recycled Year Curbside Dropoffs Events Recyclers Facilities Commercial Incineration Landfill Incineration
Aluminum 349.19 3.43 157.52 0.32 179.96 7.96
Appliances 8,805.74 1.49 8,744.65 59.60
Batteries - lead acid 334.13 333.43 .70

Glass 1,338.21 276.11 655.80 0.22 387.00 19.08
Ferrous Metal 19,207.58 42.59 200.01 3.26 17,209.70 1,752.02
Nonferrous metal (except
aluminum) 4,125.50 22.45 3,953.77 149.28
Cardboard 17,960.19 108.08 1,824.04 0.58 6,885.73 9,141.76
Newsprint 4,218.04 536.63 382.11 3,273.18 26.12
Magazines 986.59 984.00 2.59
All other paper 8,581.25 231.23 644.10 2.36 7,147.94 555.62
Plastic - PETE (#1) and HDPE (#2) 7,072.22 112.46 769.56 0.41 5,513.76 676.03
Tires 4,359.15 62.54 3,990.61 306.00
Used motor oil 43.53 1.00 30.58 11.95
Wood 26,117.54 5.35 15,911.67 10,200.52
Yard waste 7,457.51 7,454.01 3.50
Organics 1,401.80 603.50 794.80 3.89 0.39 3.50
Other (miscellaneous) 1,254.49 0.70 1,253.79
Commingled recyclables 1,433.99 1,154.70 2.30 277.00
Electronic scrap 138.77 16.12 29.65 93.25
Total 115,185.42 2,487.68 4,633.14 88.30 58,672.30 23,969.18 25,331.32 3.89 0.39 3.50
Private Recyclers includes MRF's, scrapyards, AbiBow Recycling, and tire dealers
Institutional/Commercial includes that which county recycling staff collect plus what nonmanufacturing companies reported recycling
IV-9
Table IV-7. Reference Year Industrial Waste Reduction in the District

Reported by Material Type
Source of Industrial Recycling/Waste Reduction

Waste Reduction - Not quantified in reference
year
Incineration - None
Solid Waste Composting - None
Resource Recycling - None
Appliances 1,125
Food 31,138
Glass 58,000
Ferrous Metal 64,058
Nonferrous Metal 33,246
Foundry Sand 6,934
Cardboard 22,638
Paper (all types) 14,463
Plastics 22,324
Passenger Tires 6
Truck Tires 9
Other Tires 1
Textiles 1,531
Wood 131,358
Yard Waste 2
Organics 11,345
Miscellaneous recycled 27,787
AEP FGD from coal combustion 211,558
Total 637,523
F. Total Waste Generation: Historical Trends of Disposal Plus Waste Reduction
The amount of waste reduction, waste disposal and waste generation in past years is shown on Table
IV-8. The amount of waste reported as recycled and the amount sent for disposal has fluctuated from
year to year. Waste generation grew substantially in the early 90’s. This may be partly due to better
measurement and reporting, particularly the reporting of industrial recycling. The national economic
recession impacted local industrial waste generation with the closing of many businesses.
IV-10
Table IV-8. Total Waste Generation Based on Disposal

plus Waste Recycled/Reduced
Source Reduction Total Waste

and Recycling Generation
MSW Landfill
Year (Includes Yard Incineration (includes
Composting Disposal
Waste Exempt
Composting) Waste)1
2002 694,998 0 0 970,562 1,665,560
2003 673,201 0 0 1,086,609 1,759,810
2004 919,905 0 0 918,950 1,838,855
2005 733,342 0 0 1,031,271 1,764,613
2006 682,113 0 0 968,906 1,651,019
2007 806,524 11 0 1,034,641 1,841,176
2008 811,136 14 0 996,900 1,808,050
2009 768,421 8 0 913,834 1,682,263
2010 725,441 4 0 1,165,831 1,891,275
2011 654,697 3 0 1,318,674 1,973,373
2012 773,474 4 0 1,074,149 1,847,627
Note 1: Exempt waste does NOT include fly ash and bottom ash resulting from coal combustion
but does include exempt waste disposed in municipal solid waste landfills.
G. Reconciliation of Waste Generation
Table IV-9 is identical to Table IV-5. No reconciliation is needed.

Table IV-9. Adjusted Reference Year Total Waste Generation for the District
Generation Rate Total Exempt Waste

Type of Waste (lbs/person/day) Generation (TPY)
Residential/Commercial 5.81 395,109
Industrial 20.64 1,404,941
Exempt 0.39 26,807
Total Waste Generation 26.84 1,826,857
H. Waste Composition
1. Residential/Commercial Sectors
The waste composition percentages for the reference year total waste generation are from the U.S.
EPA Report, Municipal Solid Waste in the United States: 2011 Facts and Figures as prepared by
Franklin and Associates. The District has chosen this method as an alternative to a waste sort. Waste
sorts are time consuming and expensive. Although a waste sort might provide accurate numbers for
the District, it is unlikely that the results would be so different from the projections as to change the
waste reduction and recycling strategies contained in this plan.
IV-11
The percentages of total waste generation for various materials in the waste stream as projected by
Franklin and Associates for the year 2011 are used to calculate the values in Table IV-10. The
percentages are applied to 395,109 tons per year. All amounts are rounded to the nearest whole
number. This method is intended to give a general idea of the types and amounts of material in the
waste stream, particularly materials targeted for recycling. However, as stated in the OEPA Report,
there are many Subtitle D wastes that are generated but not included in this itemization, such as
municipal sludges, land clearing debris, agricultural wastes, and construction and demolition debris,
which will most certainly be included in the tons generated by the District in the reference year.
Table IV-10. Estimated Residential/Commercial Waste Stream

Composition in the Reference Year
Percentage of Tons
Waste Stream Type
total R/C waste generated
Rubber and Leather 3.00 11,853
Paper and paperboard 28.00 110,631
Aluminum 1.40 5,532
Other nonferrous metals 0.80 3,161
Ferrous metals 6.60 26,077
Container glass 4.60 18,175
Plastics 12.70 50,179
Organics 14.50 57,291
Textiles 5.20 20,546
Wood 6.40 25,287
Yard waste 13.50 53,340
All other 3.30 13,039
Total 100.00 395,109
2. Industrial Sector
The District has done an industrial waste survey annually since 1992. The survey has been kept very
simple in an attempt to get the highest possible participation. Since 2001, industries were asked to
list disposal by material in addition to itemizing materials recycled. In general, industries seem to have
provided reliable information about the portion of the industrial waste stream that is recycled. In some
cases the amount sent for disposal was estimated or reported as a lump sum labeled "trash", however
most industries leave this part entirely blank. Therefore, there is little specific information about the
portion that is sent for disposal. Table IV-11, Industrial Waste Composition, includes only information
that was actually reported. It does not include estimates. Therefore we are listing 90,996 tons of
waste as uncharacterized. This is the amount actually reported as recycled under "other" or actually
reported by landfills as disposed less all itemized waste streams.
Of the “uncharacterized” waste sent for disposal 24,023 tons was reported by industries that
responded to a waste and recycling survey. Most of these industries also reported recycling.
Therefore, we assume that this waste is either material for which there is not a recycling market or is
material that is in some way contaminated or commingled with other waste to the extent that it cannot
be recycled. The remainder of the “uncharacterized” waste, 39,186 tons, can be assumed to be
IV-12
generated by the non-responding industries. The biggest category of non-responding were small
employers. These industries are generally not big waste generators and often find it difficult to find
recycling services. They also may have determined that the additional labor or the space requirements
for segregating items for recycling is not cost effective.
Table IV-11. Estimated Industrial Waste Stream Composition for The Reference Year
Tons Tons Tons

Waste Type Generated Disposed Recycled
Waste Reduction - Not quantified in reference
year -
Incineration - None -
Solid Waste Composting - None -
Resource Recycling - None -
Appliances 1,125 1,125
Batteries - lead acid 0 0
Food 31,138 31,138
Glass 75,136 17,136 58,000
Ferrous Metal 64,058 64,058
Nonferrous Metal 33,246 33,246
Foundry Sand 6,934 6,934
Cardboard 22,715 77 22,638
Paper (all types) 14,661 198 14,463
Plastics 22,324 22,324
Rubber -
Passenger Tires 6 6
Truck Tires 9 9
Other Tires 1 1
Textiles 1,531 1,531
Wood 131,358 131,358
Yard Waste 2 2
Organics 11,345 11,345
Sludge 14,029 14,029
Ash 11,590 11,590
Slag 7,619 7,619
Aluminum filter cake 2,415 2,415
Cement 5,602 5,602
Uncategorized 90,996 63,209 27,787
AEP FGD/gypsum/WWTP solids * 857,100 645,542 211,558
Total 1,404,941 767,418 637,523
* AEP Conesville landfilled 103,341 tons of gypsum, 4,108 tons of Wastewater Treatment
Plant solids and 538,096 tons of flue gas desulphurization material in their captive facility
in Coshocton County.
IV-13
Waste Reduction Rates as Calculated for the Reference Year:
The residential/commercial waste reduction rate for 2012, is calculated to be 29.2%
Calculation: waste disposal + waste reduction + recycling + composting = waste generation
waste reduction + recycling + composting/field spreading X 100 = waste reduction rate

waste generation
279,924 tons disposed + 3 reduced + 115,182 tons recycled and composted = 395,109 tons
115,185
395,109 X 100 = 29.2% waste reduction rate
The industrial waste reduction rate is 45.4%.
Calculation:
waste reduction + recycling + composting X 100 = waste reduction rate
waste generation
767,418 tons disposed + 637,523 recycled = 1,404,941 tons industrial waste generation
637,523 X 100 = 45.4 %

1,404,941
The overall recycling rate if residential/commercial and industrial waste generation and recycling is
combined is
115,185 tons r/c recycling/composting + 637,523 tons industrial recycling X 100 = 42%
395,109 r/c waste generation + 1,404,941 industrial generation
IV-14
V. Planning Period Projections and Strategies
A. Planning Period
The reference year for this plan is 2012. The beginning year of the ten-year planning period is 2015.
The last year of the planning period is 2024. An additional year, 2025, is included in this plan so
that if for any reason the plan is not approved for implementation until 2016, the planning period will
still include ten years.
B. Population Projections
The 2010 census was used as the basis for population projections. The Ohio Development Services
Agency (ODSA), Office of Research, "Population Projections for Ohio Counties 2010-2040" 1 report
contains population projections for each county for the years 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025.
Straight line averages were applied to the years in between those intervals to project populations for
individual jurisdictions. Adjustments were made to the population of each county as explained in
Chapter IV of this plan and as shown in Table IV-1. Using this data assumes the entire county will
change at the same rate, while in reality, individual jurisdictions grow or shrink at varying rates. We
chose not to use the ODSA May 2013 report that estimates annual rates of change and 2012
populations per jurisdiction because it showed decreases for Perry County that conflict with their
long range projections for growth, and because we could not find information supporting the validity
of the estimations.
Almost one third of the population of Coshocton County lives in the city of Coshocton. The remainder
of the population is spread between 22 townships and 5 villages. According to ODSA, the population
of Coshocton County will continue to decrease slightly throughout the planning period.
Located adjacent to Franklin County, Fairfield County is experiencing a higher rate of growth in the
western portion of the county than the eastern portion. Overall, the population of the county is
projected at 1% growth per year. More than half the population lives in the cities of Lancaster and
Pickerington, and Violet Township. The remaining population is spread between 12 townships and
13 villages.
Licking County is also located adjacent to Franklin County and is experiencing a higher rate of growth
in the western half of the county versus the eastern half. Overall, the population is projected to
increase at a rate of .8% per year. Almost half the population lives in the cities of Newark, Pataskala
and Heath. The remaining population is spread between 25 townships and 11 villages.
Perry County population has been slowly increasing since 1970. The southern third of the county is
Wayne National Forest and there is a large state forest north of New Lexington. The population is
spread between 14 townships and 11 villages. The county seat of New Lexington numbers less than
5,000 people.
1
http://development.ohio.gov/files/research/P6090.pdf
V-1
Table V-1. District Population Projections
Year Projected Population 2012 through 2025 Total District

Coshocton Fairfield Licking Perry Population
2012 36,791 138,598 160,411 37,136 372,936
2013 36,740 140,456 161,742 37,298 376,237
2014 36,690 142,313 163,074 37,460 379,537
2015 36,640 144,171 164,406 37,622 382,838
2016 36,548 145,948 165,797 37,777 386,070
2017 36,456 147,726 167,188 37,932 389,301
2018 36,364 149,503 168,579 38,087 392,533
2019 36,272 151,281 169,969 38,242 395,764
2020 36,180 153,058 171,360 38,397 398,996
2021 36,074 155,088 172,867 38,622 402,651
2022 35,968 157,119 174,373 38,847 406,307
2023 35,862 159,149 175,880 39,071 409,962
2024 35,756 161,179 177,386 39,296 413,618
2025 35,650 163,210 178,893 39,520 417,273
C. Waste Generation Projections
1. Residential/Commercial Sector
As discussed in Chapter IV, the residential/commercial waste generation figure used for the District
in the reference year, 2012, is 5.81 pounds per person per year. Per capita residential/commercial
waste generation has fluctuated between 5.8 and 7 pounds per person per day since 1998.
Unemployment rose in all four counties from 2007 to 2009 as a result of the economic recession
and has slowly recovered to close to pre-recession levels without a corresponding increase in waste
generation. Employment opportunities have increased in the commercial rather than industrial
sector. The biggest factor in annual fluctuation is likely the characterization of waste when it is
accepted at the landfill. It is certain that some industrial waste has been reported by landfills as
general waste in the past, and that discrepancy is likely to continue.
Waste from the oil drilling industry will be categorized as commercial based on their SIC code. As
wells are developed in Coshocton County, this waste stream is likely to increase unless there is a
corresponding major growth of beneficial use projects. Therefore, we have used the 2012 waste
generation rate for 2012 as the starting amount and then project very modest growth in waste
generation of .1% per year for the remainder of the planning period, reflecting recovery from the
recession with continued reduced consumption. Considering historical decreases in generation, we
believe this modest increase is not overly conservative.
V-2
Table V-2. District Residential/Commercial Waste Generation Projections

Per Capita Total
District Rate of
Year Generation Residential/Commercial
Population Change
Rate Generation (TPY)
2012 372,936 5.81 395,109
2013 376,237 (see note) 5.59 383,539
2014 379,537 0.10% 5.59 387,291
2015 382,838 0.10% 5.60 391,050
2016 386,070 0.10% 5.60 394,745
2017 389,301 0.10% 5.61 398,448
2018 392,533 0.10% 5.61 402,157
2019 395,764 0.10% 5.62 405,873
2020 398,996 0.10% 5.63 409,596
2021 402,651 0.10% 5.63 413,762
2022 406,307 0.10% 5.64 417,936
2023 409,962 0.10% 5.64 422,118
2024 413,618 0.10% 5.65 426,307
2025 417,273 0.10% 5.65 430,505
Note: Increased generation from higher population offset by not producing the additional 16,000
tons of yard waste from the direcho of 2012.
2. Industrial Sector
The industrial waste generation for the reference year was 1,404,941 tons. This amount is more
than the amount that was projected for the reference year in the District’s last Plan Update
(1,319,300 tons). Industrial waste has decreased 25% in the last fifteen years (averaging 1.6% per
year), due to the loss of manufacturing companies in all four counties. That decrease has been
offset by a 34% increase in solid waste byproducts of coal combustion (FGD). Both waste streams
combined result in an increase of 2% in the last fifteen years. To give a more accurate projection of
future industrial waste generation, Table V-3 has been modified to separate these two waste
categories. We project an industrial waste stream with modest decreases of 1% annually, and
project the FGD waste stream with realistic increases of 2% annually. It should be noted, however,
that a large plant closing or opening has a substantial effect on the generation for industries other
than coal combustion. The projected industrial waste generation for the planning period is shown in
Table V-3.
Comparing recycling rates to generation within SIC categories confirmed that industries creating
waste that is easily recycled are already recycling at rates exceeding 50%. The only industries that
do not report high recycling rates are five companies in the textiles and leather categories,
representing only 272 tons of waste. As has been stated multiple times, the FGD material from one
company is the only waste stream for which adequate recycling does not already exist.
V-3
Table V-3. Projected Industrial Waste Generation

Projected Projected Coal
Combined Projected General Combustion By-
Year
Industrial Waste Industrial Waste product
Generation (TPY) Generation (TPY) Generation (TPY)
2012 1,404,941 547,841 857,100
2013 1,416,605 542,363 874,242
2014 1,428,666 536,939 891,727
2015 1,441,131 531,570 909,561
2016 1,454,006 526,254 927,753
2017 1,467,299 520,991 946,308
2018 1,481,015 515,781 965,234
2019 1,495,162 510,624 984,538
2020 1,509,747 505,517 1,004,229
2021 1,524,776 500,462 1,024,314
2022 1,540,258 495,458 1,044,800
2023 1,556,199 490,503 1,065,696
2024 1,572,608 485,598 1,087,010
2025 1,589,492 480,742 1,108,750
3. Exempt Waste
Exempt waste generation for the entire planning period is based on the amount generated in 2012.
Exclusive of the coal combustion waste disposed in AEP's captive facility, the exempt waste generated
in this District has decreased more than 100% in the last fifteen years, but has fluctuated widely each
year. Because exempt waste is so company-specific, an accurate projection would require knowing
which specific companies will exist throughout the planning period. Therefore, exempt waste is
projected at no growth for the planning period to accommodate both increases and decreases over
time. If the status of waste from oil drilling changes from being solid waste to being exempt waste, it
is possible that the exempt waste will increase, particularly in Coshocton County where drilling is
likely.
V-4
Table V-4. Total Waste Generation for the District During the Planning Period
Residential/ Total Waste Generation Rate

Year Industrial Exempt
Commercial Generation (lbs./person/year)
2012 395,109 1,404,941 26,807 1,826,857 26.84

2013 383,539 1,416,605 26,807 1,826,951 26.61
2014 387,291 1,428,666 26,807 1,842,764 26.60
2015 391,050 1,441,131 26,807 1,858,988 26.61
2016 394,745 1,454,006 26,807 1,875,559 26.62
2017 398,448 1,467,299 26,807 1,892,553 26.64
2018 402,157 1,481,015 26,807 1,909,979 26.66
2019 405,873 1,495,162 26,807 1,927,842 26.69
2020 409,596 1,509,747 26,807 1,946,150 26.73
2021 413,762 1,524,776 26,807 1,965,345 26.75
2022 417,936 1,540,258 26,807 1,985,001 26.77
2023 422,118 1,556,199 26,807 2,005,124 26.80
2024 426,307 1,572,608 26,807 2,025,722 26.84
2025 430,505 1,589,492 26,807 2,046,804 26.88
D. Projections for Waste Stream Composition
There is a general trend for less newsprint as that industry scales back the size of each edition. As
electronic communication grows, the need for printed information decreases, therefore the amount of
paper in the residential waste stream is not projected to grow in the future. The potential to generate
an increased amount of waste from oil well drilling (hydraulic fracturing) is the only trend identified
that could result in a substantial shift in the composition of the commercial waste stream.
Many of the industries that responded to the industrial survey did not give information regarding the
nature of that portion of the waste stream that is sent for disposal. While most commonly recycled
materials such as cardboard, wood and office paper have been addressed with recycling
opportunities, larger volume specialty wastes pose a bigger challenge. This district has a number of
companies that make composite products that are not easily separated for recycling. Sixty percent of
the District manufacturers employ ten or fewer employees. Such small companies typically take their
materials to the residential bins, where they are reported under the residential recycling.
The biggest recycling challenge is the waste stream generated by the AEP Conesville coal burning
power plant. In spite of efforts to find beneficial uses for the waste that results from the combustion
of coal to produce electricity, 645,542 tons of FGD waste and 354,228 tons of exempt waste was
landfilled at the AEP's Conesville Residual Waste Landfill in 2012.
E. Waste Reduction Strategies through the Planning Period
The 2009 State Plan requires Solid Waste Management Districts to implement (or continue) waste
reduction strategies which will enable the district to meet the goals established by the 2009 State
Plan. In general, these goals are as follow:
V-5
Goal #1 ensure there is adequate infrastructure to give residents and commercial

businesses opportunities to recycle solid waste.
Goal #2 at least 25 percent waste reduction rate for the residential/commercial sector
and at least 66 percent waste reduction for the industrial sector.
Goal #3 Provide at least a website, comprehensive resource guide, inventory of available

infrastructure and a speaker or presenter as outreach to educate the public.
Goal #4 Provide education, outreach, marketing and technical assistance regarding

reduction, recycling, reuse, composting and other alternative methods to manage solid
waste to identified target audiences using best practices.
Goal #5 Provide strategies for managing scrap tires, yard waste, lead-acid batteries,
household hazardous waste (HHW) and obsolete electronic devices.
Goal #6 Explore how to incorporate economic incentives into source reduction and
recycling programs.
Goal #7 Evaluate the impact of recycling programs on reducing greenhouse gas emissions
(currently optional).
Goal #8 Market development strategy, optional.
Goal #9 Annual reporting of plan implementation (Accomplished through the preparation

of the Annual District Report submitted to Ohio EPA.)
Current programs are thoroughly described in Appendix G. Expansions or revisions of those existing
programs, and new programs to meet the above goals will be explained here. Many of the planned
strategies and programs address more than one goal. The explanation of a strategy or program will
not be repeated under each goal.
GOAL #1 AND #2
The 2009 State Plan encourages districts to implement programs that will lead to compliance with Goal #1
and Goal #2, but compliance with only one goal is required. The District met the residential/commercial
requirement of Goal #2 in the reference year, 2012. However, due to the large amount of non-recyclable
FGD material generated by in-district industry, the District did not meet the industrial recycling goal and will
never attain 66% industrial recycling unless there is a major change in the industrial waste stream or a
major breakthrough in recycling coal combustion related waste. Until one of those changes occurs, the
District must prepare a plan that will comply with Goal #1.
The 2009 State Solid Waste Management Plan states:
a. A multi-county SWMD must demonstrate that at least 90 percent of the residential

population in the entire district has access to waste reduction and recycling
V-6
programs through the entire planning period. Opportunities to recycle must be

available to no less than 85 percent of the residential population (or the equivalent
of one less drop-off than would be necessary to achieve 90 percent, whichever is
greater) in each individual county.
b. All programs and activities being used to demonstrate compliance with the
residential sector component of Goal #1 must collect a minimum of five of the
materials identified as highly amenable to recovery from solid waste generated by
the residential sector.
c. The SWMD must also demonstrate that generators in the commercial/institutional

sector have access to recycling or other alternative management methods for at
least five of the materials identified as highly amenable to recovery from solid
waste generated by the commercial/institutional sector.
d. The SWMD with a residential/commercial reduction and recycling rate less than 25
percent and/or an industrial reduction and recycling rate of less than 66 percent
must annually increase the reduction and recycling rate for each sector.
e. The SWMD must demonstrate that it will encourage participation in available

recycling infrastructure through outreach and education programs and/or economic
incentives.
The twelve “highly amenable” materials are corrugated cardboard, office paper, newspaper, glass
containers, steel containers (food and beverage cans), aluminum containers, plastic containers,
wood packaging including pallets, lead acid batteries, major appliances, yard waste, and food waste.
The District has chosen corrugated cardboard, newspaper, steel containers, aluminum containers
and plastic containers as the targeted materials to demonstrate access for the residential sector.
The District will utilize the following programs to meet the District’s recycling access goal, parts a, b
and c.
1. Encourage Growth of Residential Curbside Recycling
Program description: The curbside recycling programs operating in the District in the reference year
are listed in Table III-4 and are fully described in Appendix G. While the number of municipalities
and townships initiating contracts for these services is growing, individual subscription service
continues to provide a significant portion of this access. County demographics limit the growth of
curbside recycling. Where the number of homes does not have the density to cost effectively
support the service, it is not likely to succeed long term. For example, the population density of the
city of Coshocton is approximately 1384 people per square mile, and curbside recycling has
successfully diverted waste for many years. The population density of the remainder of the county is
approximately 46 people per square mile, and curbside recycling for most of this population would
be cost-prohibitive. While there are pockets of higher population densities in the county, the total
number of homes to be serviced raises the cost per household to a level few communities are
willing to bear.
V-7
Knowing that the solid waste district has no authority to mandate communities offer any particular
recycling service, we encourage and assist communities in making their decision but acknowledge
that it is their decision whether or not to provide the service. The efficiency and effectiveness of
curbside recycling reflects the degree of commitment of the local government and the residents to
the program. The District remains supportive of increasing curbside in communities that are ready
to make a commitment to this type of service.
To increase the technical assistance offered to communities, the District will facilitate workshops
for local officials, using their peers as presenters to share success stories in implementing curbside
programs. By bringing the information to the communities, local officials and residents have the
opportunity to ask questions, share ideas, and gain a higher comfort level with trying a new
program.
Working together, the District and county recycling offices will create a "toolkit" that can be
distributed directly to townships and municipalities to help them analyze and budget the cost of
initiating and supporting a curbside program.
Through county recycling offices, the District will encourage residents living in areas served by
curbside recycling to make maximum use of the service and recycle as much as possible. District
and county outreach websites will highlight community curbside programs and information will be
provided to the local media for inclusion in newspapers - giving recognition to the community
beginning the service and making other communities aware of the opportunities available.
The District has an existing grant program, wherein municipalities and townships can apply for
funds to cover start-up costs (for example: containers and advertising) to initiate new programs.
The communities must match district dollars by providing the remaining expenses for the program,
and all ongoing costs in future years. Because only one community ever availed themselves of this
assistance - and then discontinued the curbside program after a few years, no funds are budgeted
in the plan. However, if revenue exceeds projections, or the cost of funded programs decreases,
funding may be available for curbside startup assistance requests.
Date of Implementation: All of the curbside programs currently operating are projected to continue
throughout the planning period. The District will not impose deadlines for communities to
implement service contracts. Workshops and creation of the "toolkit" will be added to the technical
assistance in 2016. The grant program and technical assistance will continue throughout the
planning period.
Responsible entity: Curbside recycling is and will continue to be implemented by the participating
local government, private waste hauler, or private or not-for profit recyclers. The District in
cooperation with the county recycling offices will provide technical assistance in setting up programs
and/or bidding out contracts to private haulers for recycling in conjunction with waste collections
through creation of a "toolkit" and facilitation of workshops. The District may offer funding
assistance to assist in starting new curbside recycling programs if there are funds available at any
point in the planning period.
Audience: The target for technical assistance will be the local officials throughout the district. The
target for promotion of existing curbside programs will be residents in the communities served by
curbside. The primary benefit of the program will go to the local government jurisdiction in which
V-8
curbside is implemented.
Materials designated: Programs will be encouraged to collect as many materials as possible

considering available markets and collection and processing costs. In order to count toward the
access goal and to receive district funding, curbside programs must collect the materials
designated for access.
Measurement method: To measure demonstration of access, the District will track the population
served by curbside programs. In the reference year, curbside programs provided 35% access in
Coshocton County, 12% in Fairfield County, and 29% in Licking County. Annual surveys will be used
to measure the amount of waste reduced. Annual increases will be measured by comparing survey
results to previous years.
Waste reduction: The hauler, government or processor is responsible for reporting the amount
diverted for recycling to the District. In the reference year, it was reported that 2,488 tons of
material was collected for recycling from curbside programs. That amount is .63% of the total
residential/commercial waste generated in the District. Since curbside recycling services are
initiated by communities and private waste haulers, the District will not control the rate of growth for
this recycling strategy. The District will offer technical assistance to any community wishing to enter
into a contract to provide new curbside service to their residents. Projected waste reduction for
curbside recycling will be combined with drop-off recycling because both programs target the same
waste stream.
2. District Funded Drop-off Recycling
To supplement curbside recycling, the District funds drop-off recycling in all four counties. The
number and location of sites continues to change as curbside programs begin, and as service needs
are identified. The District overall meets or exceeds the required access, even if, at times, one
county may drop below 90% temporarily. The recycling drop-off locations are listed on Table III-5a.
Details regarding how the recycling drop-off locations contribute to the calculation for access needed
to comply with Goal #1 are included in Chapter VII of this plan. Appendix G contains a full
description of the programs in place at the beginning of 2014.
In addition to demonstrating that the residents have access to recycling, district-funded drop-off
locations increase material diverted from landfills. The focus on refining the current network of sites
will work toward increasing tons each year without losing the required access.
Program Description: Annual contracts with member counties to provide residential recycling
services that will maintain 90% access for that county will continue throughout the planning period.
The number and locations of sites will fluctuate with the provision of recycling services by the private
sector. All drop-off locations will accept cardboard, newspaper, aluminum and steel cans, and #1
and #2 plastics, as required to be counted toward the access goal. The District is committed to
working with material collectors and processors to expand the types of materials accepted at each
drop-off site, such as glass, paperboard, magazines, and additional plastics. Expanding the types of
materials accepted will increase overall tons recycled. The District and each county will make an
increased effort to engage site hosts in sharing responsibility for maintaining the site, ensuring that
only recyclable material is left at the site, and promoting the site to residents. This effort may
include site host agreements, stipends for site improvement/maintenance, presentations at trustee
V-9
or council meetings, using volunteer groups to help clean sites and educating residents at drop-off
sites, and possibly a District award program for exemplary sites.
Date of implementation: Residential access goals have been reached and will be maintained
throughout the planning period as illustrated in Table VII-2. Counties will add sites as needed based
on the population of the District and population served by curbside recycling. In addition, sites may
be added in locations under-served by existing recycling services where the tons of material collected
will assist the District in reaching the waste reduction goal at any point throughout the planning
period.
Responsible entity: The District will provide funds to each of the four counties through contracts. The
four counties will implement the drop-off recycling program with the cooperation of cities, villages,
townships, non-profits, or businesses to establish and maintain drop-off locations. Counties will
report the amount recycled per month per site to the District. District staff will annually compile a
detailed report on the drop-off program with costs and tons recycled. The Board of Directors and the
Policy Committee will annually review the report and recommend changes if needed to maximize the
cost efficiency and effectiveness of this program. Prior to removing poorly performing sites (either
lack of participation or excess trash), the District and the County Recycling Office staff will meet with
the site host to discuss ways to improve public participation and a concerted effort will be made to
improve performance with removal as a last resort.
Audience: The audience will be the residents of the cities, villages and townships served by the
recycling program. The drop-off program will be designed to be a network, which in combination with
curbside recycling programs, serves the entire area of each of the four counties in the District.
Materials Designated: The five (minimum required) designated materials for full-service drop-off
programs will be the same for each of the four counties (service areas) - cardboard, newspaper,
plastics, aluminum and steel containers.
Measurement method: Contracts between the District and Counties specify the location of drop-off
sites and require that any change be approved by the District in order to maintain access. As
curbside programs increase, the need for drop-off locations to demonstrate access will diminish,
however some will still be needed to provide increased diversion from landfills and commercial
access to recycling opportunity. Contracts will continue to require that sites are highly visible from
the closest public roadway, easily and safely accessed by the public, capacity of each site is at least
six cubic yards for rural sites and ten cubic yards for urban sites, signage is readable and contains a
list of materials accepted, and that service to each site will adequately meet the demand of the
public for its use in order to comply with Goal #1. Contracts will continue to require annual surveys
of residents, and a comparison against previous surveys will measure the effectiveness of the
marketing and outreach by each county.
Waste reduction: Because the number of District-funded drop-offs will vary relative to the number of
curbside recycling programs offered, the two programs must be projected together for future waste
diversion. In the reference year, 4,633 tons of materials were reported as being collected by district-
funded drop-off sites. This amount is 1.173% of total residential/commercial waste generated.
V-10
Actual waste diversion rates of individual drop-off sites ranged from .1% to 6.5% in the reference
year. The District is projecting that curbside and drop-off programs together will divert 2.4% of the
total residential and commercial waste generated by 2015, 3% by 2019, and 3.5% by 2024. This
doubling of the tonnage within the ten year planning period is expected to be accomplished by an
increase in the number of curbside programs, better reporting of recycling tonnages by commercial
businesses, and placing more drop-off bins throughout the counties.
3. Multi-material Drop-off Recycling Facilities
Each county has at least one permanent facility that provides a recycling opportunity for residents,
businesses, and industries to drop off multiple recyclable materials. Three facilities are located in
urban areas (Skip's Recycling in Coshocton, Denison's Red Barn in Granville and Community Action
Recycling Center in Lancaster), two are located in rural areas (SBC Recycling in Croton and Perco in
New Lexington). All contribute toward the attainment of the access goal. They are described in
detail in Appendix G.
Date of Implementation: All multi-material drop-off recycling centers existed prior to this plan update
and are expected to continue operation throughout this planning period. It is possible that
ownership may change or that the materials accepted will change to reflect market pricing -
operational aspects not under the control of the District.
Responsible entity: All multi-material drop-off recycling centers are owned and operated by private
for-profit or not-for-profit businesses. They are solely responsible for making all operational decisions
about materials accepted, hours available, and whether or not to remain open to the public.
Audience: Multi-material drop-off recycling facilities are part of the network of access to recycling
and serve the residential, commercial and industrial sectors of the entire area of the District.
Materials designated: All multi-material drop-off recycling facilities accept at least the materials
designated in this plan for the residential sector - aluminum cans, steel cans, cardboard, plastic #1
and #2, and newsprint. Additionally, some accept mixed office paper and other materials from the
commercial and industrial sectors.
Measurement method: To demonstrate that these facilities contribute to access, they will be
monitored to ensure they continue to accept the five designated materials. Should their operations
change to the point where they do not contribute to access, counties will increase the number of
drop-off locations. To demonstrate that they contribute to waste reduction, they will be surveyed
annually for recycling totals. These facilities historically provide very good detailed information about
the materials they accept, segregating residential/commercial from industrial. Because some also
accept materials from county drop-off programs, that tonnage is subtracted from their annual total to
avoid double counting.
Waste Reduction: These businesses rely on materials to generate income and have an internal
incentive to increase the amount of materials they accept. Most also process materials, including
V-11
those collected through the county drop-off programs. No projection is made for future diversion
increases, as these are private businesses.
Goal #1, Part d and e - annually increase the reduction and recycling rate for all sectors
The District has surpassed the 25% residential/commercial waste reduction goal, but has not
attained the 66% industrial goal, and will not until there is a change in the market for FGD material.
However, the District is committed to continuing and aggressively expanding programs to reduce
waste and to increase recycling.
The District supports the following programs that increase the tons of material recycled but do not
contribute toward the Access goal. Some are programs implemented by the District, others are
programs implemented by the private sector independent of the District. Projections of tonnages are
based on historical recycling reported by various entities. It will not be district programs driving this
increase, but will be a result of private companies striving to be profitable.
4. Access to Recycling Opportunities for Institutions and Businesses
Program Description: Each of the four counties’ institutional recycling programs include recycling
collections at municipal and county government facilities and at public schools. The government
programs reinforce the importance of recycling by setting an example in the community. School
recycling programs complement and reinforce waste reduction and recycling education. Both
sectors are top employers in all four counties. A list of the agencies that participate is included on
the "Residential/Commercial Recycling in the Reference Year" spread sheet that is included in
Appendix F of this Plan.
Date of Implementation: These programs existed prior to this plan update and are expected to
continue throughout this planning period. To increase the tons recycled through this program, each
county will increase the number of schools and government offices served, expand the types of
materials collected, and increase education through the county recycling offices to encourage
participation in the programs.
Responsible entity: In all four counties, the programs are coordinated by the County Recycling
Offices. Each office will be responsible for contacting all schools and county government agencies to
offer technical assistance and collection. In some cases, the government agency or school manages
its own recycling program or contracts with a private waste hauler or recycler for service.
Audience: The beneficiaries are the individual agency or school, taxpayers, and the general public.
Materials designated: No specific materials are designated. Each program targets materials based
on an identified need. Virtually all programs recycle paper. Many recycle corrugated cardboard and
beverage containers, but other materials may be included.
Measurement Method: Each of the county offices reports the amount collected by institutional and
school recycling programs to the District.
Waste reduction: In 2012, 263 tons were reported as collected by these programs, or .0666% all of
V-12
residential/commercial waste generated. These programs are designed to meet special needs, not
necessarily to bring in large amounts of material. Through a concerted effort to educate the
employees of municipal, county and school facilities, as well as offering the services to more
facilities, the District is targeting government and school recycling programs to collect .1% of the
total residential/commercial solid waste generated by the fifth year of the planning period, 2019.
Those efforts will include working with the schools and government offices to ensure that waste
hauling contracts and school disposal policies do not create barriers for initiating or expanding
recycling activities.
5. Commercial waste reduction and recycling:
Program Description: Business recycling is primarily the responsibility of the individual business.
However, the District in cooperation with the recycling offices in each of the four counties can assist
businesses to reduce waste and increase recycling in several ways:
a. Provide education and technical assistance including guidelines and methodology for
performing waste audits to help businesses identify alternatives to waste generation and
methods for the collection and marketing of recyclable materials.
b. Identify recycling service providers. If necessary, help identify businesses that can utilize
recycling services and facilitate a match between businesses and service providers.
c. Promote materials exchange programs. The District will cooperate with and promote
participation in local or state waste exchanges as they are available.
Date of implementation: The District has been assisting businesses since its inception. District staff
and county recycling office staff will continue to serve as an information resource for business and
industry throughout the planning period.
Responsible entities: Individual businesses or institutions with the District and/or the county
recycling offices providing information and technical support and the services listed above on an as-
needed basis. The District's education and information services for the commercial sector will be
integrated with the industrial program.
Audience: The primary benefit will accrue to the individual business or institution.
Materials designated: The District will encourage businesses to recycle any material for which there
is a market. The following five materials will be designated: corrugated cardboard, office paper,
newspaper, aluminum beverage containers, and steel cans.
Measurement method: The District will periodically survey businesses, recyclers, and waste haulers
to gain information about the amount of commercial material that is being reduced or recycled, and
will also use information provided by Ohio EPA.
Waste reduction: The amount of commercial material recycled is not available as a discrete number.
It is included in the amounts reported by waste haulers/recyclers; scrap yards, and material recovery
facilities. A discussion of the total waste reduction expected from recycling by all of these methods
V-13
will be included at the end of the discussion of residential/commercial recycling.

6. Recycling collection by private waste haulers
Program Description: Waste hauling companies account for a significant amount of recycling
collection through a combination of curbside services for local governments, collection and
processing contracts for drop-off locations, and commercial recycling collection. The haulers that
provide recycling services are denoted as doing so on the hauler list in Chapter III, Table 10.
In addition to the district-funded drop-off locations, AbiBow Recycling maintains Paper Retriever bins
in Fairfield and Licking Counties. The bins provide capacity for mixed paper at no cost to the district,
and provide a financial incentive to site hosts by paying for the paper collected. However, as this is a
service provided by a private company, the District will not control the continuation of this service or
its rate of growth.
The District's role in these efforts will be educational. The District and County Recycling Offices will
continue to promote these companies and encourage businesses and communities to use their
services. They will be included as partners in special collection events, and will be sent information
on local events and services for distribution to their customers.
Date of Implementation: Recycling through the private sector preceded the existence of the district
and is projected to continue throughout the planning period.
Responsible entity: The District and county recycling offices will be responsible for engaging waste
haulers that provide recycling services to strengthen the network of information providers for
residents and businesses.
Audience: Private haulers are part of the network of access to recycling and serve the residential,
commercial and industrial sectors of the entire area of the District. Increased communication and
information sharing will broaden the distribution of recycling information to residents and businesses
in the District.
Materials designated: When hauling companies are under contracts with local governments to
collect materials at curbside or have contracts to service drop-off containers, they will be encouraged
to collect the materials that are designated in that service area. Otherwise, the selection of material
will be the option of the individual hauler.
Measurement method: The District will continue to survey private waste haulers and recycling
companies annually. The District does not, however, have a means of requiring that hauling
companies respond to the annual survey.
Waste reduction: In 2012, 3,643 tons were reported as collected by private waste hauling
companies, exclusive of curbside programs. The District projects that private waste haulers will
continue to offer recycling services for those customer who request it and are willing to pay for the
services.
V-14
7. Private scrap recyclers and end use industries
Program Description: The District is served by a number of private scrap recycling industries which
are located both inside and out of the district. Most scrap recyclers specialize in certain types of
materials - metals, paper, or plastic. Some serve primarily residential and small commercial
customers and others specialize in industrial materials. The scrap yards located in the District and
some out-of-district scrap yards are included on Table III-5. The materials that they accept are listed
in the table.
Several end-use industries also accept commercial recyclables and use these in the manufacture of
new products. End use industries are listed in Table III-5.
Date of Implementation: Private scrap recyclers and end use industries exist independent of the
District and will continue to operate where and when it is profitable to do so. The District will make
maximum use of local businesses to strengthen the network of recycling opportunities and support
the local economy. The District's role in these efforts will be educational. The District and County
Recycling Offices will continue to promote these companies and encourage businesses and
communities to use their services. They will be included as partners in special collection events, and
will be sent information on local events and services for distribution to their customers.
Responsible entities: Private recyclers and scrap yards for operation, the District, and County
Recycling Offices for education.
Audience: Private recyclers and end-use industries are part of the network of access to recycling and
serve the residential, commercial and industrial sectors of the entire area of the District. Increased
communication and information sharing will broaden the distribution of recycling information to
residents and businesses in the District.
Materials designated: The materials that are recycled vary with each company. In Chapter VII, the
private scrap recyclers that accept the materials that are designated for commercial recycling are
listed.
Measurement method: The District will continue to survey scrap yards annually. The District does
not, however, have a means of requiring private companies to respond to the annual survey
Waste reduction: A projection of the amount targeted for collection in the future through private
haulers, scrap recyclers, and material recovery facilities will be included in this chapter after all these
methods have been discussed.
8. Material Recovery Facilities
The recycling process is not complete until the materials are sorted, processed, and marketed.
Scrap yards provide these services for materials that are relatively homogeneous (like ferrous metal).
Commingled recyclables are usually taken to a material recovery facility for separation and
processing.
V-15
Program Description: Perco uses its own facility to process materials it collects in Perry County.
Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action uses its own facility to process materials it collects in Fairfield
County. Rumpke uses its own facility to process materials it collects in Licking County. Coshocton
County materials are taken to a Rumpke facility in Mount Vernon where they are separated and
processed. Private haulers use these or other facilities depending on economic factors like
transportation distance, facility ownership, hours of operation, tip fee, and material sorting capability.
To increase the tons of material they recycle, material recovery facilities can expand the type of
material they accept, increase the types of trucks and trailers they can accommodate, lengthen their
hours of operation, pay for materials delivered to their door, and install equipment to process
materials more cost effectively. In this plan, the District will focus on working with the owners of
material recovery facilities to ensure that sorting and processing capacity keeps pace with collection
services.
Date of Implementation: Material recovery facilities exist independent of the District and will
continue to operate where and when it is profitable to do so. The District will make maximum use of
local businesses where it is cost effective to do so, to strengthen the network of recycling
opportunities and to support the local economy.
Responsible entities: The private profit or not-for-profit facilities. The CFLP District may offer funding
assistance for the improvement of material recovery facilities where there is a demonstrable benefit
in tons diverted from landfills or reduced cost to the district for providing sorting, processing and
marketing services, based on funds available during the planning period. The District will continue to
support applications to state agencies for grant funding for MRF improvement projects.
Audience: Material recovery facilities are part of the network of access to recycling and serve the
residential, commercial and industrial sectors of the entire area of the District. They are integral to
maintaining a cost effective recycling program.
Materials designated: The materials that are recycled vary with each facility. If the facilities are
processing materials for curbside or drop-off programs that are required programs to demonstrate
recycling access, they must either process all of the materials designated for access or must work in
cooperation with another service provider so that all the designated materials can be collected,
processed and marketed.
Measurement method: The District will continue to survey MRF’s annually. The District
does not, however, have a means of requiring private companies to respond to the annual survey
unless the District has a contract for services with the facility.
Waste reduction: In the reference year, MRF’s, scrap yards, and recycling collections by private
haulers accounted for the recycling of about 21.19% of the entire residential/commercial waste
stream. This is consistent with projections made in the last plan. In this plan, we are projecting 28%
by 2019 through MRF’s, scrap yards, and private haulers.
V-16
9. Yard Waste Composting
Program Description: The yard waste composting facilities that are located in the District are listed
in Table III-6. Six facilities were available to the public in the reference year and five facilities are
now available to the public. They include Hope Timber, ELM Recycling, the Compost Farm, Kurtz
Brothers Brookside in Licking County, and Pine Grove Landfill in Fairfield County. In the past the
District provided financial assistance for the development or upgrading of composting facilities –
both publicly and privately owned. These investments resulted in long term sustainability in only two
facilities. Therefore, funding for future composting facilities has not been included in this plan.
Date of Implementation: Public education programs will continue throughout the planning period.
Responsible entities: County recycling offices are responsible for the public education program that
encourages property owners to manage yard waste in their own yard by using mulching mowers and
by backyard composting.
Audience: The residents of the District are the target audience for the education program.
Materials designated: Yard waste and clean wood waste.
Measurement method: The District requests information regarding the amount of material accepted
for composting from each registered compost facility. In addition, the District utilizes the information
provided to Ohio EPA on the composting facility data reports that were submitted to Ohio EPA.
Waste reduction: In 2012, 23,969 tons of yard waste was reported as diverted to composting
facilities. This is approximately 6.07% of the total residential/commercial waste stream. This spike
is largely due to the direcho that hit all four counties in June 2012 and caused widespread damage.
The amount recycled is expected to decrease back to normal levels in 2013. Although the District
believes that composting and fall leaf collection with field spreading actually diverts more material
than the amount that has been reported, getting documentation for the field spreading and the back
yard composting activities is not possible. Therefore, the District will continue to depend on
composting for only 1.76% diversion of the total residential/commercial waste stream.
10. Residential waste reduction, recycling, reuse and composting information, education and
technical assistance
Goal #3 - Provide a website, a comprehensive resource guide, an inventory of available

infrastructure, and a speaker/presenter.
Program Description: The District provides a website that incorporates all known local recycling
opportunities and infrastructure available to CFLP residents, businesses and industries. In addition,
the District office is available to provide presentations as requested.
Each county in the solid waste district employs a Recycling Office which has historically provided
local education to the public. Annual contracts between these offices and the District specify that
V-17
each office will maintain a website, will produce a comprehensive resource guide, an inventory of
available infrastructure, and will have staff available to make presentations. District and county
websites combine the infrastructure inventory and recycling resources into one Recycling Guide that
is available in both printed and digital form.
Date of Implementation: All five websites existed prior to the beginning of this planning period and
will continue to operate throughout the current planning period.
Responsible Entity: The District and county recycling offices.
Audience: Target audiences were prioritized as: 1. Residents, 2. Schools and school age youth, 3.
Institutions and commercial businesses, 4. Communities and political leaders, and 5. Industries.
Measurement method: It is expected that websites will be maintained with up-to-date information,
contain an infrastructure inventory and comprehensive recycling guide. Information that targets
business and industry as well as the general public will be included. It is expected that these
strategies will result in increased recycling. However, a specific amount cannot be attributed to
these strategies.
Goal #4 - Provide education, outreach, marketing and technical assistance regarding reduction,
recycling, reuse, composting and other alternative waste management methods to identified
target audiences using best practices. This section also addresses Goal #1, part e, encourage
participation in recycling programs through marketing and outreach.
Program Description: To meet the goals of the 2009 State Plan, the County Offices shifted their
focus from promoting awareness to changing behavior to decrease waste and increase recycling.
Each office shall, as a condition of their annual contract with the District, provide education,
outreach, marketing, and technical assistance regarding reduction, recycling, composting, reuse,
and other alternative waste management methods to identified target audiences using best
practices.
Target audiences were prioritized as: 1. Residents, 2. Schools and school age youth, 3. Institutions
and commercial businesses, 4. Communities and political leaders, and 5. Industries.
1. To focus marketing of the recycling programs to residents, the Offices will increase the visibility of
recycling opportunities and of recycling in general. Positive reinforcement of desired behavior is an
effective tool in maintaining and increasing participation. Offices will increase and upgrade the use
of electronic and other communication methods, using technology that is current and widely popular
to reach the largest population possible. Because this sector also includes the individuals that are
targeted in all other groups, these strategies will reach the largest audience.
2. The Offices will continue to market recycling to youth through schools and youth organizations
with programs similar to those presently implemented, continuing to keep them updated and
relevant. Offices will update their programs to meet instructional standards, link classroom
education with actual school and residential recycling opportunities, and engage older youth through
hands-on opportunities like assisting with school recycling and waste reduction programs and with
V-18
community volunteer opportunities. School age youth comprise 19% of the district population,
according to the 2010 census. This demographic group will also be reached through strategies
targeting the general residential population.
3. The Offices will improve communication with commercial businesses to engage their assistance
in reporting recycling. This will include recognition for business recycling efforts, serving as an
information source regarding recycling service providers and recycling opportunities, and maintaining
relationships with local business and trade organizations. This sector includes all non-manufacturing
companies, government agencies and schools. The audience is strictly adult and the focus is on how
recycling can impact "the bottom line" for the business.
4. The Offices will increase their involvement with communities and maintain contact with local
officials. They will provide technical support and encouragement to communities that are providing
or may in the future provide recycling opportunities – publicly recognizing their contribution to
meeting the access goals. Additionally, community support will continue to include participation in
and promotion of local collection or clean up events, periodic presentations to township trustees or
village councils and displays at local community events. In many cases, this audience contains the
hosts of drop-off locations, and continual encouragement throughout the year will increase the
success of each site by engaging the host in the operation and use of those sites.
5. The Offices will support recycling and waste reduction of industries by serving as an information
source regarding recycling service providers and recycling opportunities, giving public recognition to
their efforts. Outreach to industries on the district level will increase communication with industries
through local trade associations, website information, and annual recycling reports.
Minimum requirements:
Each county office will prepare an annual Marketing and Outreach Plan. The County Marketing and
Outreach Plan will clearly define the strategies and programs that will be used to market to each
target audience and will describe how the strategy or program will effect a change in behavior
resulting in increased recycling and waste reduction. Many of the activities will be continuations of
existing activities that have been adapted to meet the new focus, and many activities will address
more than one target audience or priority action.
Because the Marketing and Outreach Plan for each county will be tailored to the needs of the county
and will change from year to year as conditions change or new opportunities arise, this solid waste
plan will not specify a list of required activities within the Marketing Plans.
Date of implementation: 2015 and continuing for the entire planning period.
Responsible entity: Recycling office in each county. In the event that District revenue is insufficient
to adequately fund mandatory programs in this Plan, the education and awareness activities that are
required by this Plan to meet State Plan Goals may be implemented by the District office or a
consolidated education program. In this case an annual marketing plan that addresses each of the
five target audiences in each of the four counties and meets or exceeds the minimum requirements
included in this Plan will continue to be required.
Audience: Each of the five targeted audiences with clearly defined strategies for each audience.
V-19
Measurement method: The strategies to meet the requirements of Goal #3 and Goal #4 as listed
above are very flexible by design. It is expected that these strategies will result in increased
recycling. However, a certain amount can not be attributed to these strategies. It is required that
the Annual Marketing and Outreach Plans will include specific programs and activities with clearly
defined objectives. Each office will be responsible for documenting how the Marketing Plan was
implemented and measuring the impact of specific activities.
11. Goal #5 - Develop strategies for managing tires, yard waste, lead-acid
batteries, household hazardous waste (HHW) and obsolete electronics.
A. Tires:
The District will continue to implement four waste tire management strategies:
a. Through the County health departments, monitor compliance with the requirements of Ohio’s tire
management regulations regarding the collection, transportation, storage, and disposal of tires. If
funding is available after mandatory programs have been funded, the District may support the
cleanup of tires on private property through local health departments where a commitment has been
made to attach a lien on the property to recover the funds invested.
b. Promote to the public, particularly to individuals who may generate waste tires, year-round
opportunities to use licensed tire haulers/recyclers and legal disposal options.
c. Where year-round recycling/disposal opportunities do not exist, provide opportunities for residents
to dispose of tires through special tire collection events where fees are charged to participants to
cover costs.
d. If funding is available after mandatory programs have been funded, the District may financially
support litter collection programs on public property (roadways, parks, waterways) to include the
removal of illegally dumped tires.
Note regarding funding: There are two fundamental District philosophies that impact this and other
programs. The first is that waste generators must take responsibility, including financial
responsibility, for recycling or disposal of all of the waste that they generate. The second is that
District programs should complement and enhance private recycling businesses, not compete.
In the case of materials like tires and other difficult to manage materials, acceptable disposal or
recycling opportunities may not be easily available to all residents at an affordable cost. The District
will continue to provide financial support to collection programs for these items if programs are
needed and as funds are available once mandated programs have been funded. However, the
District will require that competitive fees be charged or donations be accepted at all collection
events.
V-20
B. Household Hazardous Waste Management (HHW)
The District is committed to continually providing a public education program to educate residents
about the problems associated with HHW disposal and encouraging residents to find alternatives to
using or disposing of products considered to be hazardous. Household hazardous waste education
has been incorporated into the ongoing outreach programs in each of the four counties. Each
County Recycling Office will be responsible for education within their county, and while the program
will deliver a consistent message and theme, actual presentations and materials may differ locally.
The minimum requirements will be availability and delivery in an appropriate manner of:
a. A brochure or flyer targeted to residential waste generators with consumer information about
ways to reduce the amount of hazardous household material requiring disposal and about safe
disposal alternatives.
b. At least one newspaper, newsletter or other public article on reducing household hazardous waste
and using safer alternatives in each county each year.
C. Lead acid batteries: The District will continue to include recycling opportunities for lead acid
batteries in all recycling guides and brochures
D. Electronics and other "hard to dispose" items:

First and foremost, the District and County Recycling Offices will promote private year-round recycling
and disposal opportunities. The District supports collection programs for appliances and electronics
if no other option exists and if funds are available once mandatory programs have been funded. The
District will require that competitive fees be charged or donations be accepted at all collection
events.
Date of Implementation: 2015 and continuing for the entire planning period.
Responsible entity: County health departments are responsible for monitoring the legal
transportation, storage, processing and disposal of solid waste, including the items aforementioned.
They will report violations to the District if/when they occur. The District Office and Recycling Offices
in each county are responsible for promoting private businesses that recycle the listed materials,
and encouraging the general public and businesses to use them.
Audience: Residents, businesses and industries throughout the District.
Measurement method: The goal of education and promotion of local businesses is to create a
network of recycling opportunities that are self-sustaining and independent of District subsidy, so
that they continue to be available for District residents and businesses throughout the planning
period. Following the example of lead-acid batteries, the recycling of yard waste, electronics, tires
and appliances need not be subsidized or operated by government, but can be profitably integrated
into private business if given time to develop. Just as the District provided funding to purchase
equipment to burn used motor oil to create a recycling outlet for the general public, so may the
District use grant funds when available to assist private businesses create or expand infrastructure
V-21
to provide recycling of the aforementioned materials to the residents and businesses in the District
where such infrastructure does not already exist.
E. Yard Waste: The restriction on the placement of source-separated loads of yard waste in landfills
began in 1995 but yard waste that is mixed with other solid waste is not banned. Haulers are not
required to collect or transport yard waste separately from other solid waste, so the ban is ineffective
at keeping yard waste out of landfills. Still, in the spirit of reducing reliance on landfills, the District
has encouraged the creation of publicly available yard waste composting facilities, and has provided
grant funds to assist in the purchase of processing equipment. Currently, publicly available yard
waste facilities operate year round in two of the four counties. The facilities are promoted by both
the District Office and County Recycling Offices. A detailed discussion is included previously in this
Chapter.
12. Goal # 6 Financial incentives:
The State Solid Waste Management Plan requires that SWMDs evaluate the feasibility of providing
financial incentives to increase participation in the recycling programs which are used to
demonstrate access to recycling. Since virtually all of the waste collection in the District is
accomplished by private haulers, some by contracts with local governments, most by subscription,
the District has no direct control of or authority to mandate financial incentives related to residential
waste collection. However, the District will provide information and technical assistance upon
request to municipalities, townships or private haulers who voluntarily initiate studies of
implementation of alternate fee structures like volume based rates.
The grant program for initiation of curbside recycling may provide an economic incentive for
communities that are ready to make the commitment to the program but lack the funds necessary to
purchase containers for residents. District funds are limited to assist in the first year of service in
return for a commitment by the community to support the program in future years. No funds are
budgeted for this program but it may be implemented if funds are available after mandatory
programs have been funded.
The grant program for improvements to material recovery facilities may provide an economic
incentive for those facilities to upgrade equipment, expand services, and increase the total tons of
material they process. No funds are budgeted for this program but it may be implemented if funds
are available after mandatory programs have been funded.
Goal #7 Evaluate the impact of recycling programs on reducing greenhouse gas emissions
This goal first appears in the 2009 State Solid Waste Plan, requiring Districts to use measurement
programs to compare recycling programs to landfilling in the production of greenhouse gases. At the
time of this submittal, the new OEPA Format which will incorporate this goal has not been adopted,
so Goal #7 is not part of this plan.
V-22
13. Goal #8 Develop markets for recyclable materials and the use of recycled-
content materials.
The District understands that strong markets pull recyclables through the system. Without markets
recycling collection efforts are futile. Therefore, the District will be involved in promoting market
growth. The following strategies will be implemented:
a. The District will identify sources of information regarding recycled products and vendors of
recycled products and will disseminate this information in answer to inquiries.
b. The Solid Waste District will purchase and use recycled content products whenever suitable
products are available at competitive prices and will encourage county agencies, local
governments and private businesses to “buy recycled.”
c. The District will encourage all of the recycling offices to continue including “buy-recycled” in
public education programs.
d. “Buy recycled” will be integrated into business and industry waste reduction and recycling
programs and education materials whenever appropriate.
e. Purchase recycled content products to be used by the general public for the purpose of
demonstrating the performance of products in practical applications. This is an optional
strategy to be implemented if there is a need. No funds have been budgeted but this may be
implemented if funds are available after mandatory programs have been funded.
Industrial Sector Implementation of Goals:
Goals #1, #3, and #4
District programs for industrial waste reduction, recycling, reuse and composting information,
education and technical assistance:
Historically, industry has had more clearly visible incentives for waste reduction and recycling than
the individual resident. Reduced use of raw materials, reduced cost for waste treatment and
disposal, and reduced potential liability associated with waste disposal have all served to provide
positive financial incentives for reducing waste. More stringent “best available technology”
requirements for both public and captive industrial disposal facilities are driving up the cost of
disposal.
Waste types and amounts vary from generator to generator and are not even very predictable within
industry types. Industrial recycling is first and foremost the responsibility of the individual industry.
However, the District will continue to assist businesses to reduce waste and increase recycling in
several ways:
V-23
a. Annual Waste Disposal and Waste Reduction Surveys: The District will continue to work with the
Industry members of the Policy Committee to obtain better participation in reports/data collection
efforts to generate industrial waste generation and waste reduction information needed by the
District. The annual survey is one of the ways that the District keeps in contact with industries and
gives the participating industries an opportunity to review and compare waste reduction and
recycling information from year to year.
b. Communications: The District and County Recycling Offices will utilize various publications, media
and the Internet to share information including information about successful waste reduction and
recycling efforts, recycling and waste reduction service providers, and markets for materials.
Business organizations and trade associations will be included in the communications network to
reach as many industries as possible
c. Waste reduction programs: The District will encourage each industrial waste generator to develop,
implement, and maintain a waste reduction program. The District will provide or identify sources of
appropriate information and forms to document business and industry waste reduction programs.
d. Facilitate participation in waste exchanges: The District and the County Recycling Offices will
work to increase awareness of and participation in all available waste exchanges.
Date of implementation: The business/industry program which will be on-going throughout the entire
planning period.
Responsible entity: Industries with the District and County Recycling Offices providing the services
listed above on an as needed basis.
Audience: The primary audiences are the industries which will benefit.
Materials designated: The District will encourage industries to recycle any material for which there is
a market.
Measurement method: The District will periodically survey industries, recyclers, and waste haulers to
gain information about the amount of industrial material that is being reduced or recycled. Industry
surveys can also be a mechanism for learning what types of assistance and services industries need.
Waste reduction: As stated previously, waste reduction exclusive of coal combustion waste is
already at 77%. The District is hampered not so much by the amount recycled (industries are doing
an excellent job of recycling) as by the large amount of coal combustion waste for which there are
limited practical recycling options. Unless this waste stream is abated or additional beneficial uses
are identified, the percentage of the industrial waste stream that is recycled will continually show
decreases. The District sets the following targets for industrial recycling exclusive of the residual
waste from the AEP Conesville Power Plant:
80% by 2019, fifth year of the planning period

82% by 2024, tenth year of the planning period
However, because the AEP Conesville residual waste stream is growing while the remainder of the
V-24
industrial waste stream is decreasing, the overall waste reduction for the combined industrial waste
stream is projected to be 40% in 2019 and 37% in 2024. Table V-6 has been split into projections
for AEP Conesville FGD material, and projections for all other industrial recycling, then combined to
show the effect that this one waste stream has on the overall waste reduction efforts of the district.
V-25
Table V-5 Residential/Commercial Waste Reduction Strategies
Type of Material Reduced

Strategy 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
or Recycled
Recycling Strategies
1. Curbside Recycling
Residential recyclables 7,121 7,843 8,565 9,287 10,010 10,732 11,454 12,176 12,288 12,946 13,604 14,263 14,921 15,068
2. District funded Drop-off Recycling
Percent reduction 1.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 3.0% 3.1% 3.3% 3.4% 3.5% 3.5%
Residential, commercial,
3. Multi-material drop-off
industrial
4. Government and school recycling Paper, OCC, and other

263 283 304 324 345 365 385 406 410 414 418 422 426 431
programs commercial recyclables
5. Commercial recycling Commercial recyclables
6. Recycling collection by waste haulers

Residential/commer-
7. Private scrap yards cial recyclables
Amount recycled by 4, 5, 6, and 7 83,741 87,864 91,987 96,111 100,234 104,357 108,481 112,604 117,046 121,488 125,930 126,635 127,892 129,152
Percent reduction 21.19% 22.91% 23.75% 24.58% 25.39% 26.19% 26.97% 28% 29% 29% 30% 30% 30% 30%
9. Yard waste facilities 23,969 6,750 6,816 6,882 6,948 7,013 7,078 7,143 7,209 7,282 7,356 7,429 7,503 7,577
10. Goal #3 and #4 - Residential,

commercial, industrial waste reduction and No specific material or
recycling education programs amount for recycling
associated with
11. Goal #5 - Strategies for hard to
implementation of these
dispose items 88.30
goals
12. Goal #6 - Financial incentives
13. Goal #8 - Market Development
Waste reduction by incineration -
3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50
contributes to Goal #2
Total Residential Recycling and Reduction 115,185 102,744 107,676 112,608 117,539 122,470 127,401 132,333 136,956 142,133 147,311 148,753 150,746 152,230
Projected waste generation 395,109 383,539 387,291 391,050 394,745 398,448 402,157 405,873 409,596 413,762 417,936 422,118 426,307 430,505
Percent Waste Reduction 29.15% 26.79% 27.80% 28.80% 29.78% 30.74% 31.68% 32.60% 33.44% 34.35% 35.25% 35.24% 35.36% 35.36%
V-26
Table V-6 Industrial Waste Reduction Strategies

Strategy 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
or Recycled
COMBINED INDUSTRIAL WASTE

Recycling through in-house use of materials, brokers, scrap yards, All types of industrial
637,523 623,814 621,674 619,544 617,425 615,317 613,220 611,133 609,057 606,991 604,936 602,891 600,857 598,832
waste haulers, and end use industries recyclables
Waste Reduction
Many industries have waste reduction programs, but amounts All types of industrial
reduced are not quantified recyclables
Total Recycling 637,523 623,814 621,674 619,544 617,425 615,317 613,220 611,133 609,057 606,991 604,936 602,891 600,857 598,832
Total Industrial Waste Generation 1,404,941 1,416,605 1,428,666 1,441,131 1,454,006 1,467,299 1,481,015 1,495,162 1,509,747 1,524,776 1,540,258 1,556,199 1,572,608 1,589,492
FGD
Strategy 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
or Recycled
Recycling through in-house use of materials, brokers, scrap yards,
211,558 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
waste haulers, and end use industries FGD material
Waste Reduction
Total Recycling 211,558 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Total Industrial Waste Generation 857,100 874,242 891,727 909,561 927,753 946,308 965,234 984,538 1,004,229 1,024,314 1,044,800 1,065,696 1,087,010 1,108,750
ALL OTHER INDUSTRIAL WASTE

Strategy 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
or Recycled
Recycling through in-house use of materials, brokers, scrap yards, All types of industrial
425,965 423,814 421,674 419,544 417,425 415,317 413,220 411,133 409,057 406,991 404,936 402,891 400,857 398,832
waste haulers, and end use industries recyclables
Waste Reduction
Total Recycling 425,965 423,814 421,674 419,544 417,425 415,317 413,220 411,133 409,057 406,991 404,936 402,891 400,857 398,832
Total Industrial Waste Generation 547,841 542,363 536,939 531,570 526,254 520,991 515,781 510,624 505,517 500,462 495,458 490,503 485,598 480,742
V-27
VI. Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used

[ORC Section 3734.53 (A)(7)-(12)]
A. District Methods for Management of Solid Waste
Tables VI-1 through VI-3 summarize the ways in which the District plans to manage solid
waste during the planning period. In all three of the tables the amount of waste generated
for the reference year is from Table V-4. The amount of residential/commercial waste that
will be recycled and managed by yard waste composting is from Table V-5 and amount of
industrial waste to be recycled is from Table V-6. The amount of material to be landfilled is
calculated by subtracting the amount to be managed by recycling and composting from the
total waste generation. Columns for Municipal Solid Waste Composting and Transfer have
been omitted because they are not necessary methods for managing District waste.
Regardless of whether the waste is direct hauled or diverted through a transfer station, its
ultimate destination is the landfill. Hauling methods are up to the individual hauler and not
a function of solid waste district planning.
Table VI-1 Waste Management Methods Used and Processing

Capacity Needed for Each Year of the Planning Period
Management Methods to be Used and Processing Capacity

Tons of SW Required
Year
Generated
Yard waste
Incineration Recycling Landfill
Composting
2012 1,826,857 3.5 728,736 23,969 1,074,148
2013 1,826,951 3.5 719,804 6,750 1,100,393
2014 1,842,764 3.5 722,530 6,816 1,113,414
2015 1,858,988 3.5 725,266 6,882 1,126,836
2016 1,875,559 3.5 728,014 6,948 1,140,594
2017 1,892,553 3.5 730,772 7,013 1,154,766
2018 1,909,979 3.5 733,540 7,078 1,169,357
2019 1,927,842 3.5 736,319 7,143 1,184,376
2020 1,946,150 3.5 738,800 7,209 1,200,137
2021 1,965,345 3.5 741,839 7,282 1,216,220
2022 1,985,001 3.5 744,888 7,356 1,232,753
2023 2,005,124 3.5 744,211 7,429 1,253,480
2024 2,025,722 3.5 744,096 7,503 1,274,120
2025 2,046,804 3.5 743,482 7,577 1,295,742
VI-1
Table VI-2. Summary of Residential/Commercial Waste Management Methods
Management Method Used and Processing Capacity Required

Tons in TPD and TPY
Year
Generated Yard Waste
Incineration Recycling Landfill
Composting
2012 395,109 3.5 91,213 23,969 279,924
2013 383,539 3.5 95,990 6,750 280,795
2014 387,291 3.5 100,856 6,816 279,615
2015 391,050 3.5 105,722 6,882 278,442
2016 394,745 3.5 110,588 6,948 277,206
2017 398,448 3.5 115,454 7,013 275,977
2018 402,157 3.5 120,320 7,078 274,755
2019 405,873 3.5 125,186 7,143 273,540
2020 409,596 3.5 129,743 7,209 272,640
2021 413,762 3.5 134,848 7,282 271,629
2022 417,936 3.5 139,952 7,356 270,625
2023 422,118 3.5 141,320 7,429 273,365
2024 426,307 3.5 143,239 7,503 275,562
2025 430,505 3.5 144,650 7,577 278,275
Table VI-3. Summary of Industrial Waste Management Methods
Management Method Used and

Processing Capacity Required in TPD
and TPY
Tons
Year Recycling Landfill
Generated
2012 1,404,941 637,523 767,418
2013 1,416,605 623,814 792,791
2014 1,428,666 621,674 806,992
2015 1,441,131 619,544 821,587
2016 1,454,006 617,425 836,581
2017 1,467,299 615,317 851,982
2018 1,481,015 613,220 867,795
2019 1,495,162 611,133 884,029
2020 1,509,747 609,057 900,690
2021 1,524,776 606,991 917,785
2022 1,540,258 604,936 935,322
2023 1,556,199 602,891 953,308
2024 1,572,608 600,857 971,751
2025 1,589,492 598,832 990,660
VI-2
B. Demonstration of Access to Capacity
Landfill Capacity
At the present time, there are three publicly available landfills (a fourth is permitted and
licensed but not operating) and two captive landfills located in the District. In addition,
District waste is sent to multiple out-of-district publicly available landfills. In the reference
year, no waste was sent out of state for disposal.
Table VI-4A lists all of the landfills, both publicly available and captive that have been
identified as taking waste from the CFLP District in 2012. With the exception of Coshocton
Landfill which has ceased operation, they are all expected to be available to receive District
waste for all or part of the planning period. Since the District does not direct the flow of
waste, the amount of waste that will go to specific public facilities in the future is not known.
However, with twenty years of history, we have a basis for our projections.
The amount of material that is projected to go into public and captive landfills is presented
on Table VI-4B. The two captive facilities that will be used during the planning period are the
Conesville Residual Waste Landfill and the Owens-Corning facility. The present capacity
estimate for the Conesville Facility falls short of the 10 year planning period. At the present
rate of use, the facility will reach capacity by 2020.
As of December 2008, American Electric Power (AEP) planned to construct a new Class III
Residual Waste (RSW) Landfill near the Conesville Power Plant. The Reiker Hill Residual Solid
Waste Landfill will be located in Muskingum County. The wastes anticipated to be placed in
this landfill include coal fly ash, bottom ash, stabilized flue gas desulfurization (FGD)
materials, synthetic gypsum: and purge stream solids. These wastes will be hauled by truck
from Coshocton County for placement and disposal in the landfill. AEP has filed a permit
application with the Ohio EPA. In this plan we are assuming that AEP will be successful in
opening a new captive landfill to manage waste generated by the Conesville Plant for the
duration of the planning period. 1
The Owens-Corning facility has a projected capacity that substantially exceeds the planning
period. Obviously, planned or unplanned changes in production and/or new waste reduction
and recycling programs will affect the amount of material that each industry sends to its own
facility. We are assuming that when the industries made the projections for the life of their
disposal facilities, the industries took anticipated changes in waste generation into account.
Based on 260 disposal days per year, the average daily need at publicly available landfills in
2012 was 1,852 tons. It will remain about the same throughout the planning period. The
1
On Table VI-4B we have shown waste continuing to go to an AEP captive landfill after the
end of the Conesville Landfill’s present permitted life. If for some reason a captive facility
was not available, it would be possible for this waste to be accommodated at existing
landfills. We expect the average daily waste generation based on 260 days to be about
2,730 TPD. This would amount to less than 16% of the AMDWRL of the three landfills in the
District.
VI-3
existing landfills in the district are permitted to take up to 18,500 tons per day or more than
4,810,000 tons per year. Obviously, not all of that capacity is actually available to the
District, but the calculation does demonstrate that the capacity available far exceeds
anticipated needs. Table VI-4 B presents a scenario in which all of the waste generated in
the District is landfilled in the District. Even if the AEP Conesville Landfill were to close when
its present permitted capacity is expended, the other landfills could manage all of the waste
generated in the District for the entire planning period. The only purpose of this table is to
demonstrate adequate capacity. It is expected that waste will continue to go to out-of-district
facilities in about the same proportions as it has in the past so the amount of waste actually
going to in-district landfills will be substantially less than that shown.
Since the District does not direct waste and has not entered into contracts with facilities to
take specific amounts of waste, the landfills in the District can and do accept out-of-district
and out-of-state waste. However, unless there is a drastic change in the flow of waste, the
District’s needed capacity is secure. There is also considerable capacity within a 70 mile
radius of the District. The capacity outside the District provides security for the District in
several ways. Facilities outside of the District will be available for district waste if needed.
Ample disposal capacity to the east and northeast of the District provide buffers between this
District and waste exporting counties in northern Ohio and east coast states. Substantial
capacity in southeast Ohio offers an out-of-district alternative to the southeast sector of the
District. Table VI-4B illustrates that if Suburban and Pine Grove continue to accept waste at
the current rate, there is ample capacity left at Tunnell Hill for the remainder.
Transfer Capacity
Some waste from the CFLP District goes through transfer facilities as part of the process of
staging the waste to be transported to a landfill. It may be advantageous and cost effective
for municipalities and private waste haulers to use existing transfer facilities. However, since
there is available landfill space very close to the District, transfer stations are not considered
by the District to be absolutely necessary to the management of District waste. Therefore, it
is not projected as a waste management method and it has not been included in the tables.
Recycling Capacity
At the present time commercial and industrial recycling is managed by non-profit and for
profit recycling facilities, private material recovery facilities, scrap yards, scrap brokers, and
end market industrial users of recycled materials. A list of the recyclers utilized by the
commercial businesses and industries in 2012 is found on Table III-5d. Although the
recyclers did not report the amount of available capacity, the District is confident that there is
and will continue to be sufficient capacity to process and market the expected commercial
and industrial output as long as there are available end markets.
Residential recyclables are being sorted, processed, and marketed by non-profit and private
recyclers. Several of the major waste hauling companies that serve the District have their
own material recovery facilities within a reasonable hauling distance from the District.
Obviously, provisions for processing and marketing of the recyclable material collected will be
an integral part of any new curbside collection contracts with private haulers. The District will
VI-4
continue to use all available private and not-for-profit facilities to collect, sort, process, and
market the materials from the drop-off programs that are included in this plan. The Rumpke
MRF alone can process 208,000 tons per year, which exceeds the residential/commercial
needs of this District. If necessary to maintain the recycling access that is a required part of
this Plan, the District may expend District funds in the future to create new or expand existing
processing facilities if it is the most cost effective means to meet state goals.
Composting Capacity
There are presently registered publicly-available yard waste composting facilities in two
counties in the District. In addition, a number of communities collect leaves in the fall and
spread the leaves on local farm fields. With the rural nature of the counties, the predominate
method of yard waste composting is at-home mulching, therefore additional composting
capacity is not a required component of this plan. No additional facilities are projected, and
the current facilities demonstrated their ability in 2012 to handle triple the current volumes.
Incineration
The District does not plan to utilize incineration as a disposal strategy for significant amounts
of general municipal solid waste. Small amounts of specialized waste streams may be
managed by incineration. For example, animal waste incinerators are being utilized in Licking
and Fairfield Counties. No additional facilities are expected, and the current two facilities
have demonstrated their ability to handle current volumes for each year of the planning
period.
Note for Table VI-4A. Information is from the 2012 Annual Operating Reports prepared by the
landfills and submitted to OEPA. The remaining years indicates the estimated number of
years of capacity as of December 31, 2012, if waste receipts continue at 2012 levels.
VI-5
Table VI-4A. Landfills that Accepted District Waste in Reference Year

Remaining Capacity at end of 2012
Amount of
Gross Remaining District Waste
AMDWR Airspace Tons for Landfilled in
Facilities Used by District L Years (cu.yds.) Placement 2012
Coshocton Landfill, Inc.
(Coshocton County) 500 168.5 9,561,892 7,142,733 35,597.40
Pine Grove Regional Facility
Landfill (Fairfield Co.) 5,000 55.7 20,101,387 15,076,040 105,165.00
Suburban South R & D Facility
(Perry Co.) 5,000 48.5 11,005,473 7,428,695 104,094.38
AEP Conesville Residual
Waste Landfill (Captive
Landfill in Coshocton Co.) NA 6.0 4,824,065 6,030,081 999,770.00
Owens Corning Landfill
(Captive Landfill in Licking
Co.) NA 75.9 3,847,272 1,298,545 16,003.00
Tunnell Hill (Perry County) 8,000 34.3 34,638,299 29,995,201 98,044.24
Beech Hollow Landfill
(Jackson Co.) 4,000 61.0 26,822,800 24,945,200 37,618.12
Kimble Sanitary Landfill
(Tuscarawas Co.) 10,000 50.5 40,479,342 27,609,441 20,378.00
Athens Hocking Reclamation
Center (Athens Co.) 2,500 72.0 14,103,500 9,872,450 8,821.65
American LF (Stark County) 15,000 68.8 83,464,395 67,606,160 1,265.82
Noble Road Landfill 4,000 14.9 10,898,900 10,135,800 1,158.08
Apex Landfill 7,500 5.5 9,759,055 8,212,485 120.52
Carbon Limestone 11000 20.1 25,099,633 21,962,179 64.86
Pike County Landfill (Pike CO.) 2,000 88.0 18,003,517 14,537,840 29.11
SWACO Landfill (Franklin Co) 8000 25.3 35,958,706 26,070,062 226.14
Crawford Co. Landfill 1200 9.8 2,696,687 2,123,376 16.38
Evergreen Landfill 7500 31.1 9,378,139 6,616,277 0.39
Total Landfilled 91,200 360,643,062 286,662,565 1,428,373.09
VI-6
Table VI-4B. Waste Management Method: Landfill-Possible Scenario for Waste Placement
Total Amount Captive AEP

Amount to Pine Grove
to be Landfills - Conesville Owens Coshocto Suburban
Publicly- Regional Tunnell
Year Landfilled based on Residual Corning n Landfill, South R &
available Facility Hill
from Table 2012 Waste Landfill Inc. D Facility
landfills Landfill
VI-1 amounts Landfill
2015 1,126,836 725,564 709,561 16,003 401,271 90,000 90,000 221,271
2016 1,140,594 743,756 727,753 16,003 396,838 90,000 90,000 216,838
2017 1,154,766 762,311 746,308 16,003 392,455 90,000 90,000 212,455
2018 1,169,357 781,237 765,234 16,003 388,120 90,000 90,000 208,120
2019 1,184,376 800,541 784,538 16,003 383,834 90,000 90,000 203,834
2020 1,200,137 820,232 804,229 16,003 379,904 90,000 90,000 199,904
2021 1,216,220 840,317 824,314 16,003 375,903 90,000 90,000 195,903
2022 1,232,753 860,803 844,800 16,003 371,950 90,000 90,000 191,950
2023 1,253,480 881,699 865,696 16,003 371,781 90,000 90,000 191,781
2024 1,274,120 903,013 887,010 16,003 371,107 90,000 90,000 191,107
2025 1,295,742 924,753 908,750 16,003 370,989 90,000 90,000 190,989
Assumptions: See narrative on pages VI-3 and VI-4.

Amount to be landfilled in AEP facility and Owens Corning Facility based on 2012 amounts.
Amounts to be landfilled in Pine Grove and Suburban correspond to current use, and assuming that the remainder will go to
Tunnell Hill demonstrates adequate available capacity without the need for out-of-district facilities. The amounts entered do not
indicate projections as to the destination of District waste, as the District has no means of knowing who will win future contracts.
VI-7
Table VI-4C Waste Management Method: Yard Waste Composting and Recycling Facilities & Services
Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Anticipated Yard Waste
23,969 6,750 6,816 6,882 6,948 7,013 7,078 7,143 7,209 7,282 7,356 7,429 7,503 7,577
Capacity Needs -
Industrial Recycling thru'

Scrap yards, waste 637,523 623,814 621,674 619,544 617,425 615,317 613,220 611,133 609,057 606,991 604,936 602,891 600,857 598,832
haulers, etc.
Residential recycling
capacity for curbside,
7,384 8,126 8,869 9,612 10,354 11,097 11,839 12,582 12,697 13,360 14,022 14,685 15,347 15,498
dropoff, school and
government recycling
Res/com Recycling
capacity needed for other
res/com recycling- 83,741 87,864 91,987 96,111 100,234 104,357 108,481 112,604 117,046 121,488 125,930 126,635 127,892 129,152
primarily scrap yards and
commercial haulers
Individual private facilities have not been listed with arbitrary tonnages projected because the District does not direct waste to specific facilities
and the facilities did not report their capacity to the District.
VI-8
C. Schedule of Facilities and Programs: New, Expansions, Closures,

Continuations
Table VI-5 is the heart of this plan. It is a schedule of the facilities and programs that the
District will implement during the planning period. The Table is organized to correspond with
the waste reduction and recycling strategies in Tables V-5 and Table V-6. Programs have
been numbered throughout the plan to provide a point of reference when reading Chapters
5 and 6, and Appendix G. The Implementation Schedule will be used by the District Board of
Directors, the District Policy Committee, and Ohio Environmental Protection Agency as the
standard of comparison for an annual assessment of the extent to which the programs and
strategies required by this plan are being implemented.
An additional column, not in the required plan format, has been added to this table. The
column headed “Mandatory or Optional Part of this Plan” is used to indicate which programs
and activities are required by this plan. Those marked “yes” are required to be implemented
in every year included in the beginning and ending dates. In some cases, reservations have
been added to “yes” strategies to explain that the general program must be implemented
but that individual facilities or sites are not absolutely necessary for successful
implementation of the overall strategy. Those marked “optional” will be implemented at the
discretion of the District Board of Directors subject to need and the availability of funds.
Funds have been budgeted to implement some optional programs in each county annually.
As long as revenue is received as projected, counties are assured that they have enough
funding to prioritize which optional program best meets their needs.
VI-9
Table VI-5. Implementation Schedule for Facilities, Strategies, Programs and Activities
Mandatory or
Name of Facility, Strategy, Location, SWMD. County,
Description Begin Date End Date Optional Part of
Activity, or Program Township/City
this Plan?
Programs Which Satisfy Goal #1 Residential Access - #1, parts a, b, c
1. Curbside 2. District Funded Drop-off 3. Multi-material Drop-off Recycling
a. Facilitate workshops and
provide written information to
Workshops and toolkit
assist communities in evaluation
District-wide in areas of population development in 2016. Technical
of curbside recycling YES
density >200 per square mile assistance ongoing, entire
b. Support and encourage use of
planning period.
1. Encourage growth of curbside services through county
curbside recycling outreach programs
a. Increase types of materials
accepted
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking, Perry Ongoing, entire planning period YES
2. Increase diversion through b. Maximize diversion with bin
drop-off locations location
Coshocton County
1. Access through Curbside Coshocton City Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
YES.
Individual
Adams Twp./Bakersville Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
curbside
programs or
Franklin Twp./Conesville Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
drop-off sites
may be
Jefferson Twp./Nellie Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
replaced by
Perry Twp./New Guilford Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period other residential
2. Access through drop off recycling
Linton Twp./Plainfield Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs as
long as the 90%
Jefferson Twp./Warsaw Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period access is
maintained
Pike Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period throughout the
planning period
Lafayette Twp./West Lafayette Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
VI-10
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Tiverton Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
3. Access through Multi-
Skip's Recycling Drop-off (Coshocton) Ongoing, entire planning period
material Dropoff Full Service - urban drop-off
Fairfield County
Berne Township Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Madison Township Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Lithopolis Village Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Carroll Village Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Pleasantville Village Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period Individual
1. Access through Curbside curbside
Baltimore Village Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
programs or
Sugar Grove Village Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
drop-off sites
Millersport Village Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
may be
Pickerington City Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period replaced by
Violet Township Curbside Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period other residential
Berne Township Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period recycling
Amanda Twp./Amanda Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs as
long as the 90%
Greenfield Township/Carroll Village Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
access is
Bloom Twp./Lithopolis Village, College maintained
Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
View Subdivision throughout the
Clearcreek Township at Oakland Grocery Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period planning period
Clearcreek Twp./Stoutsville Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster City at Gay St. Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster City at 114 Mt. Ida Ave.
(behind Utica Head Start Bldg.)
2. Access through drop off Lancaster at Ohio University Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster at 1743 E. Main, Community
Action Agency
VI-11
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Lancaster between Fairfield County
Maintenance Garage & Sheriff Office
Lancaster at Liberty Center Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster at Hunter Trace Park Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster at 2095 W. Fair Ave. Full Service - urban dropoff Ongoing, entire planning period
Liberty Twp./Baltimore Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Pickerington/Violet Twp. at the Twp.
Maintenance Lot
Pleasant Twp./Lancaster - Tiki Lane Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
YES
Pleasant Twp. at 3005 Lancaster- Individual
Thornville Rd. NE curbside
2. Access through drop off Richland Township at Pleasantville Road Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs or
Richland Township at Rushville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period drop-off sites
Walnut Township at Township Hall Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period may be
replaced by
Violet Twp at Zeller Park Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
other residential
Violet Twp.-Ohio University Pickerington Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period recycling
Violet Twp. at Trinity Family Life Center Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs as
long as the 90%
Drop-off to be added if needed to access is
maintain access: 2 urban or 3 rural or a Full Service - urban drop-off 2019 2030 maintained
combination by 2019 throughout the
Drop-offs to be added if needed to planning period
maintain access: 2 urban or 4 rural by Full Service - urban drop-off 2024 2030
2024
Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action,
3. Access through Multi- Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Lancaster
material Dropoff
Rushcreek Twp/Bremen Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Licking County
1. Curbside Etna Township Curbside (Rumpke) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
VI-12
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Union Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Bowling Green Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Madison Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Johnstown (Big-O) Non- subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Monroe Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period Individual
curbside
Granville Village (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
programs or
Granville Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period drop-off sites
Heath (multiple haulers) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period may be
Newark City (multiple haulers) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period replaced by
other residential
St. Albans Twp (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
recycling
Harrison Twp. (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period programs as
Hebron (Big-O) Subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period long as the 90%
McKean Twp. (Republic) Ongoing, entire planning period access is
Subscription curbside
maintained
Pataskala City (Big-O) Non-subscription curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
throughout the
Bennington Twp. at SBC Recycling Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period planning period
Etna Township Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Fallsbury Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Franklin Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Granville Twp./Granville Village Denison
University Recycling Barn
Granville Twp./Granville Village Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Hanover Twp./ Hanover Village Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Harrison Twp. in Outville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
2. Access through drop off Hartford Twp./Croton Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Heath in the Municipal Parking Lot Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Jersey Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Liberty Township at Northridge Rd. Full Service - rural drop-ff Ongoing, entire planning period
VI-13
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Licking Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Mary Ann Township at Wilkins Corner Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
McKean Township Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Monroe Twp./Johnstown at Village Office Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Newark at 1000 Granville Rd. at First YES
Baptist Church Individual
Newark at Cherry Valley Rd. and curbside
Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs or
Reddington Rd.
drop-off sites
Newark on 877 E Main St. behind the
Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period may be
Auto Title Office
replaced by
Newark at 161 Myrtle Ave. Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period other residential
Newark on W. Church Street at Flory recycling
2. Access through drop off Park programs as
Newark on Everett Ave. Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period long as the 90%
Newton Twp./St. Louisville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period access is
maintained
St. Albans Twp./Alexandria Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
throughout the
Union Twp./Hebron at Canal Park Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period planning period
Washington Twp./Utica Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Additional Drop-offs to be added if
needed to maintain access: 1 urban or 2 Full Service - urban drop-off 2015 2030
rural by 2015.
Additional Drop-offs to be added if
needed to maintain access: 1 more Full Service - urban drop-off 2016 2030
urban or 2 rural by 2016
Denison Univ. - Granville Full Service urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
material Dropoff
SBC Recycling, Croton Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
VI-14
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Perry County
1. Access through curbside Somerset Village Subscription Curbside Ongoing, entire planning period
Bearfield Twp. at Hunter's Run Market Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Clayton Twp. at Saltillo Grange Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Coal Twp./New Straitsville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Harrison Twp./Crooksville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
YES
Harrison Twp./Roseville Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Individual
Hopewell Twp./Glenford Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period curbside
Jackson Twp./Junction City Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs or
Monroe Twp./Corning Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period drop-off sites
2. Access through drop off may be
Pike Twp/New Lexington near Senior
replaced by
Citizens Center Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
other residential
Pike Twp/New Lexington at MRDD recycling
offices Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period programs as
Pike Twp/New Lexington at 605 N. Main long as the 90%
St. Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period access is
maintained
Reading Twp./Somerset at Holy Trinity
throughout the
School Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
planning period
Salt Lick Twp./Hemlock Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
2. Access through drop off
Salt Lick Twp./Shawnee Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Thorn Twp./Thornport Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Thorn Twp./Thornville at fire station Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
Thorn Twp./Thornville at 65 E. Columbus
St., Grace Lutheran Church Full Service - rural drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
PerCo - on Rt. 13 NE at PerCo Inc.
material Dropoff Full Service - urban drop-off Ongoing, entire planning period
VI-15
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Programs for Commercial/Institutional Waste Generators - Satisfy Goal #1 parts d and e, and Contribute to Goals #3 and #4
a. Use of drop-off recycling bins
b. Paper Retriever bins available

4. Access to Recycling
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry for paper products
Opportunities for Institutions Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties
and Businesses
c. Recycling collection at govt
office buildings and public
schools
Provide education and technical
assistance including guidelines
5a. Provide education and and methodology for performing
technical assistance including Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry waste audits to help businesses
Ongoing, entire planning period YES
guidelines and methodology Counties identify alternatives to waste
for waste audits generation and methods for the
collection and marketing of
recyclable materials
Identify businesses that can
5b. Identify recycling service Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry utilize recycling services and
providers Counties facilitate a match between
businesses and service providers
5c. Promote materials Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry

exchange programs. Counties Promote materials exchange
programs that are available.
VI-16
Mandatory or
this Plan?
YES- No specific
hauler is
6. Recycling collection by
District will promote companies required to
private waste hauling
and encourage businesses to use provide service
companies providing service
Entire District their services, partner for events, Ongoing, entire planning period as long as
to residential, commercial
and send event information for private sector
and industrial waste
distribution to customers recycling
generators
services are
available.
YES
No specific
scrap yards,
broker, or end
use industry is
District will promote companies
7. Private scrap yards, required to
and encourage businesses to use
brokers, and end use provide service
Entire District their services, partner for events, Ongoing, entire planning period
industries both in and out of as long as
and send event information for
the District private sector
distribution to customers
recycling
services
continue to be
generally
available.
VI-17
Mandatory or
this Plan?
YES
No specific MRF
is required to
District will offer technical and
provide service
possibly financial assistance to
as long as there
facilities to upgrade equipment,
is sufficient
8. Material Recovery expand types of material
Entire District Ongoing, entire planning period materials
Facilities processed and service to
recovery
communities where it will result
capacity to
in increased diversion from
service the
landfills
recycling access
required by the
District
9. Yard waste composting and Yard waste composting and
"don't bag it" education for Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry "don't bag it" education for
residents through County Counties residents through County
recycling offices recycling offices
Programs Which Satisfy Goal #3 and Goal #4 -

10. Waste reduction and recycling marketing and outreach for residential/commercial and industrial waste generators
The following programs address recycling and waste reduction marketing and outreach programs to targeted audiences in the following priority order: 1) Residents, 2)
Schools and school age youth, 3) Institutions and commercial businesses, 4)Communities and political leaders, 5) Industries.
Each county (or the District) will

maintain a web site/s which
provides comprehensive
Web Site The District and each county resources regarding how to Ongoing, entire planning period YES
participate in local recycling and
waste reduction opportunities for
all target audiences.
Comprehensive, up-to-date guide
Comprehensive Resource A guide for each county or a district-wide
for how, where, when, and what Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Guide guide
to recycle in each county.
VI-18
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Comprehensive, up-to-date
Infrastructure inventory of
Inventory for each county or a district- inventory of recycling programs
basic recycling infrastructure Ongoing, entire planning period YES
wide guide and services (public and private)
and services in each county
available for each county
Speaker/presenter (staff or
Speaker/presenter available
volunteers) available to provide
to provide appropriate
Available in all four counties. appropriate presentations Ongoing, entire planning period YES
presentations regarding
regarding recycling and waste
recycling and waste reduction
reduction
Each county recycling office (or
the District) will prepare a
Prepare an annual marketing Marketing Plan for each of the four marketing plan that annually
and outreach program counties addresses strategies to increase
recycling/waste reduction by all 5
targeted audiences
11. Programs Which Satisfy Goal #5 - Strategies for managing tires, lead acid batteries, household hazardous waste and electronics
A. Tires
Through the County Health
Departments, monitor
compliance with the
1. Monitor compliance with
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry requirements of Ohio's tire
Ohio tire management Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties management regulations
regulations
regarding the collection,
transportation, storage, and
disposal of tires.
2. Inform public about Inform public about licensed tire
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry
licensed tire haulers and legal haulers and legal disposal Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties
disposal options options
3. Promote on-going
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Promote on-going opportunities
opportunities for residents to Ongoing, entire planning period
Counties for residents to dispose of tires.
dispose of tires
VI-19
Mandatory or
this Plan?
YES
B. Household Hazardous Waste

1. Brochure or flyer regarding a. Brochure or flyer regarding
HHW safe disposal and HHW safe disposal and Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties
alternatives to use alternatives to use
2. Promote safe alternatives b. At least one newsletter or
through media publication at newspaper article each year in Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties
least annually. each county
3. Promote on-going
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Promote on-going opportunities
opportunities for residents to Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties for residents to dispose of HHW.
dispose of HHW
C. Lead acid batteries
Lead acid batteries: Utilize

existing private business The District through the local
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Recycling offices will continue to
network for recycling Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties educate the public regarding the
batteries. Educate public to
recycle batteries. proper management of spent
lead acid batteries.
D. Electronics and other Hard to Dispose Items

Optional based
Collection event for items that
Collection events for hard to on need and
have no local outlet if judged to
dispose of items including available
Any of the four counties be needed and if funds are Any year of planning period
tires, HHW, appliances, funding
available. Reasonable fee to be
electronics and other items
charged or donations accepted.
12. Programs Which Satisfy Goal #6 - Financial Incentives
VI-20
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Provide information and technical

Provide information and
assistance to local governments
technical assistance
Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry and waste haulers interested in
regarding alternate fee Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Counties implementing alternate fee
structures for waste collection
structures for waste collection
like volume based rates.
like volume based rates.
13. Programs Which Satisfy Goal #7 - Market development strategy

Identify sources of
information regarding
District wide The District will assist in finding Ongoing, entire planning period YES
recycled products and
current vendors for recycled
vendors
content products as requested
Purchase and use recycled

content products whenever
suitable products are available at
Purchase recycled products District wide Ongoing, entire planning period YES
competitive prices and
encourage county agencies, local
governments and private
businesses to buy recycled.
Include "buy-recycled" in Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Include "buy-recycled" in school Ongoing, entire planning period YES
education programs Counties age and public education
programs
District wide Ongoing, entire planning period YES

Integrate "buy-recycled" into Integrate "buy-recycled" into
industry education programs industry education programs
VI-21
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Purchase recycled content
products for use by the Purchase recycled content Optional based
general public for the purpose Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry products to demonstrate on need and
Ongoing, entire planning period
of demonstrating the Counties performance of products in available
performance of products in practical applications. funding
practical applications.
Industrial sector implementation of Goal #1, #3 and #4
District wide waste disposal and
Annual industrial waste waste reduction survey of
disposal and waste reduction District wide industrial waste generators. Ongoing, entire planning period YES
surveys Implemented through District
office.
Communicate waste reduction

Communications with industry
information to industry through
through website, email and District wide Ongoing, entire planning period YES
web site, email or other methods
other appropriate methods
judged to be effective.
Encourage industry waste Use communication tools (above)

reduction by providing to disseminate information to
District wide Ongoing, entire planning period YES
information and technical assist industries to implement
assistance waste reduction programs.
Use communication tools (above)
Facilitate participation in
District wide to disseminate information about Ongoing, entire planning period YES
Materials Exchange programs
material exchanges
Funding available to assist
Improve market to recycled
industries that use recycled Optional based
materials generated in at least
materials generated in two or on need and
District wide two counties in District by funding Ongoing, entire planning period
more counties in the District available
infrastructure or equipment to
to expand capacity to use funding
increase capacity.
materials.
Other OPTIONAL Programs that are not required to meet state plan Goals
VI-22
Mandatory or
this Plan?
Optional based
Allocation for contracts with the
Health Department on need and
Any of the four counties four county health departments Any year of the planning period
enforcement available
for enforcement of ORC 3734.
funding
Allocation for contracts with the
four county sheriff's departments Optional based
for enforcement of laws on need and
Law enforcement Any of the four counties Any year of the planning period
prohibiting litter and illegal available
dumping and laws related to the funding
transportation of solid waste.
Funds allocated for the cleanup Optional based
Open Dump Cleanup on of specific dump sites through on need and
Any of the four counties Any year of the planning period
Private Property health department open dump available
legal action. funding
Allocation of funds for litter and Optional based

Open Dump Cleanup on illegal dump site clean up on on need and
Any of the four counties public property, usually Any year of the planning period
public property available
accomplished through the county funding
recycling offices.
Paying the costs incurred by
Boards of Health for collecting
Optional based
and analyzing samples from
on need and
Well Testing Counties where landfills are located. public or private water wells on Any year of the planning period
available
lands adjacent to in-district solid
funding
waste disposal facilities
contained in this plan
Funds to offset additional costs
Optional based
of maintaining roads and other
County or Township on need and
Counties where landfills are located. public facilities, and providing Any year of the planning period
Assistance available
emergency and other public
funding
services where solid waste
VI-23
Mandatory or
this Plan?
facilities operate
The District may provide funding

for costs associated with facilities Optional based
Waste reduction special
or equipment for pilot or start up on need and
projects that will result in Any of the four counties or District wide Any year of the planning period
projects for promising methods available
increases in waste reduction
for reducing waste or increasing funding
recycling.
VI-24
D. Identification of Facilities
At the present time the District has not designated facilities to which District waste must be taken.
Unless at some time during the planning period, the District designates a disposal facility or facilities,
in accordance with the right to designate reserved in Section E of this plan chapter, waste generated
in the District may be taken to any licensed solid waste disposal facility selected by the waste
generator or waste hauler.
Source separated recyclable materials may be given or sold by the owner to the hauler, broker, scrap
collector, or processor selected by the owner.
Yard waste may be taken to any registered composting facility.
Lists of landfills, recycling facilities and composting facilities presented in this plan are included to
identify the facilities that have been or are known to be available to accept materials generated in
the District. These lists are not intended to be an endorsement of these facilities or to preclude
placement of materials at facilities that are not listed.
E. Authorization Statement to Designate Facilities
At the present time the CFLP District has not designated facilities to which District waste must be
taken. However, the District reserves the right to designate a facility or facilities.
The Board of Directors of the Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste Management District is

hereby authorized to establish facility designations in accordance with Section 343.014 of the ORC
after this plan has been approved by the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
F. Waiver Process for Undesignated Facilities
If the District establishes facility designation and in the event that any person wants to use a facility,
other than a designated facility, for the disposal of municipal solid waste, the person must submit a
written request for a waiver of designation to the Board of Directors of the CFLP Solid Waste District.
The request must state the type and amount of material, the facility to be used, the intended
duration of the waiver, and the reason for requesting the waiver.
The CFLP Solid Waste District staff will review the request and may request additional information if
necessary. The Board of Directors shall act on the request for a waiver within 90 days after receiving
the request. The Board of Directors may grant the request for a waiver if the Board of Directors
determines that:
1. Issuance of the waiver is not inconsistent with projections contained in the District’s
approved plan under Section 3734.53 (A) (6) and (A) (7); and
2. Issuance of the waiver will not adversely affect implementation and financing of the
District’s approved plan.
VI-25
G. Siting Strategies for Facilities
The District developed site selection criteria and general procedures for the first District plan at a
siting workshop, held May 24, 1990 for members of the Policy Committee and the Technical Advisory
Council. In previous plans, the selection and siting criteria and procedures were continued without
significant changes.
The District does not intend to site or build any District owned or financed solid waste transfer or
municipal solid waste disposal facilities during the planning period. The District does not plan to site
any privately owned transfer or solid waste disposal facilities to serve District needs.
If a private owner decides to site a waste disposal facility or transfer facility in Coshocton, Fairfield,
Licking or Perry County that requires a permit for construction, enlargement or modification, the
District will review the permit application that is submitted to the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency and will actively participate in the public review and comment process to the extent deemed
appropriate by the District Board of Directors. The CFLP Solid Waste District has not chosen to
include a siting strategy for solid waste disposal or transfer facilities in this Plan.
The CFLP Solid Waste District is not including a siting strategy for facilities that do not require solid
waste facility permits, like recycling facilities. These facilities are subject to local zoning and building
regulations and will be treated like other industrial manufacturing and processing facilities.
H. Contingencies for Capacity Assurance and District Program Implementation
The District does not foresee any occurrence that would significantly limit the disposal or recycling
capacity available for District waste. Even if one or more of the facilities listed in Table VI-4 (A) were to
close, sufficient capacity is available in the District and in out-of-district facilities which are within a
reasonable hauling distance.
VI-26
CFLP Solid Waste Management Plan Update 2014
VII. Measurement of Progress Toward Waste Reduction Goals [ORC Section

3734.53]
This chapter identifies which of the waste reduction and recycling goals (Goal #1 and Goal #2) the
District intends to meet and develops the analysis to demonstrate compliance.
In this chapter, the term “waste reduction” means source reduction, recycling, and composting.
Resource recovery (incineration with energy recovery) is not included in the discussion and tables in
this chapter because it is not a waste reduction method that the District plans to utilize during the
planning period.
A. District Will Comply with Goal
The District will comply with Goal #1. Goal #1 establishes program standards for solid waste
management districts (SWMDs).
B. Demonstration of Compliance with Goal #1
Goal #1 in the 2009 State Solid Waste Management Plan is as follows:
SWMD must demonstrate that at least 90 percent of the residential population in each
county comprising the SWMD will have access to waste reduction and recycling programs.
All programs and activities being used to demonstrate compliance with the residential
sector component of Goal #1 must collect a minimum of five of the materials identified as
highly amenable to recovery from solid waste generated by the residential sector. The
SWMD must also demonstrate that generators in the commercial/institutional sector have
access to recycling or other alternative management methods for at least five of the
materials identified as highly amenable to recovery from solid waste generated by the
commercial/institutional sector.
The twelve “highly amenable” materials 1 are listed in Table VII-1. The 2009 State Plan does not
place a limit on the number of materials that can be targeted for both sectors.
Table VII-1 lists the materials that are designated. In this Plan each county will be a separate service
area although the designated materials are the same for each county.
1
Eleven materials are the same in the 1995 State Plan and the 2001 State Plan except that food waste is
added in the 2001 State Plan.
VII-1
Table VII-1. Materials Targeted to Demonstrate Compliance with Goal #1
C -- Coshocton County F – Fairfield County L -- Licking County P – Perry County
Twelve Materials Highly Five Materials Designated for Five Materials Designated for
Amenable to Recycling Residential Sector Commercial/Institutional Sector
C F L P C F L P
Corrugated Cardboard X X X X X X X X
Office Paper X X X X
Newspaper X X X X X X X X
Glass containers
Steel containers X X X X X X X X
Aluminum containers X X X X X X X X
Plastic containers (#1
X X X X
and #2)
Wood pallets &
Packaging
Lead-acid batteries
Major appliances
Yard waste
Food waste
Total Materials
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
designated
Steel containers: Includes food and beverage containers only
Plastic containers #1 and #2 means rigid plastic containers (narrow mouth containers only).
1. Demonstration of Compliance to Residential Standards
a. Service Area: For the purpose of determining compliance with this goal the service area will be
each of the four counties in the District: Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking and Perry Counties.
b. Access: Access is defined as the presence of waste reduction services or opportunities and other
alternative management programs. Opportunity is defined as drop-off recycling, non-subscription
curbside (curbside collection programs which are contracted and paid for by a political jurisdiction or
programs in which the resident does not pay separately for curbside recycling collection),
subscription curbside (curbside provided at the option of the residential customer, usually with an
added service fee), centralized MRF (materials recovery facility), or a combination of any of these.
The State Plan requires districts to demonstrate access for:
a minimum of 90 percent of the population of the service area; and
VII-2
the five materials targeted for the recycling program (Table VII-1). 2
The OEPA plan format allows the district to use a formula to determine the percentage of the
population which has access to services depending upon the type of service provided. Below are the
types of service which pertain to the CFLP District with an explanation of the population credit
attached to each type of service.
Non-subscription Curbside: Credit may be given for all households provided service within the
specified political jurisdiction.
Subscription Curbside: Access for subscription curbside is determined by the number of residents
who have the opportunity to subscribe to the curbside collection multiplied by 25%. (The District can
claim greater access through the actual number of subscriptions, participation, or tons recovered.
The results of a District survey could also be used as an alternative way to measure access.) Since
the haulers that offer subscription curbside did not report the number of households that subscribe,
we are using the option to multiply by 25%.
Recycling Drop-offs: Credit may be taken for 2,500 persons served in a rural area and 5,000
persons served in an urban area per full service drop-off.
A full service drop-off is a site open to the public at least 40 hours per week which handles at least
the five designated materials. Districts may take credit for a higher number served per drop-off if the
District can demonstrate that more people use the drop-off based on tons recovered. As specified in
the 2009 State Plan, each drop-off site credited toward the access goal must demonstrate that
residents can easily find and access the site, rural drop-offs must provide a minimum of six cubic
yards of capacity, urban sites must provide a minimum of 10 cubic yards of capacity, and signage is
adequate. Adequate signage must be legible and describe the materials accepted.
A rural area is defined as any municipality or township less than 5,000 in population.
An urban area is any municipality or township equal to or greater than 5,000 in population.
Credit may be taken for 2,500 persons served by a part-time drop-off.
A part-time drop-off must meet the following criteria: the five designated materials are handled and
the drop-off is available to the public at a regularly scheduled time at least once per month.
Table VII-2. shows the calculation of residential sector access for each county in the District. The
program listings correspond to the programs that were in place in the reference year or that are
planned as described in Chapter V.
2
The 2009 State Solid Waste Management Plan does not require that every recycling opportunity
collect the same five materials. The materials that each county in the District expects to collects are the five
“targeted” materials. However, market conditions, collection equipment and other factors may require that one
or more of the targeted materials be replaced by other materials from the list of materials that are highly
amenable to recycling.
VII-3
Note that not all of the existing and planned recycling and composting opportunities listed on Table
III-5 or referred to in Chapter V are listed on Table VII-2. Some recycling opportunities are not listed
for access credit because, even in combination with other programs, they do not meet the access
criteria. In most cases they do not meet the access criteria because they handle only one or two of
the five designated materials or they do not handle any of the designated materials. For example,
some of the scrap yards in the District buy ferrous and non-ferrous metals, but the only designated
material that they accept is aluminum cans. The District will actively pursue the recycling of a broad
range of materials to strive toward meeting Goal #2.
All of the calculations in Table VII-2 use the number of residents in each county, not the number of
households.
The recycling programs listed for access in the reference year are the programs that were in
existence at the end of 2012. If the program was discontinued between the end of 2012 and the
submittal of this plan, access for 2018 and 2023 will show as zero. Likewise, programs that were
not in place at the end of 2012 but were initiated prior to the submittal of this plan are listed with a
zero for access in the reference year, but values for 2018 and 2023.
During the planning period, some recycling locations may be eliminated and other locations will be
added. The District will work with each county to establish and maintain recycling opportunities that
provide the required access. Locations will be continuously evaluated and new sites will be placed in
strategic locations as needed. The recommended criteria for selecting drop-off sites are: high traffic
and high visibility location, enough space for the drop-off and patron parking, safe entrance and exit
without creating traffic hazards, cooperation of the property owner.
It should be noted that between the reference year 2012 and the present, both Fairfield and
Licking Counties have replaced drop-off sites to once again maintain 90% access.
VII-4
Table VII-2 Calculations of Access for Residential Service Area
NSC-Non-subscription curbside SC-Subscription curbside FS-Full service drop-off (open 40 hours or more, 5 designated materials)
Reference
Reference Year
Program Year 2018 2018 2023 2023
Program (2012
Type Population Population Access Population Access
Population)
with Access
Coshocton County
Coshocton City NSC 11,185 11,185 11,055 11,055 10,903 10,903
Skip's Recycling Drop-off (Coshocton) FS-Urban 11,185 5,000 11,055 5,000 10,903 5,000
Adams Twp./Bakersville FS-Rural 788 2,500 779 2,500 768 2,500
Franklin Twp./Conesville FS-Rural 1,226 2,500 1,212 2,500 1,195 2,500
Jefferson Twp./Nellie FS-Rural 1,496 2,500 1,479 2,500 1,458 2,500
Jefferson Twp./Warsaw FS-Rural 1,496 2,500 1,479 2,500 1,458 2,500
Lafayette Twp./West Lafayette FS-Rural 4,070 2,500 4,023 2,500 3,967 2,500
Linton Twp./Plainfield FS-Rural 645 2,500 638 2,500 629 2,500
Perry Twp./New Guilford FS-Rural 709 2,500 701 2,500 691 2,500
Pike Twp./West Carlisle FS-Rural 636 2,500 629 2,500 620 2,500
Tiverton Township FS-Rural 448 2,500 443 2,500 437 2,500
Total Coshocton County Population 36,791 38,685 36,364 38,555 35,862 35,903
Calculated Access Percentage 105.1% 106.0% 100.1%
Fairfield County
Berne Township Curbside (less population of
NSC 4,790 4,790 5,167 5,167 5,500 5,500
Sugar Grove)
Madison Township Curbside NSC 1,728 1,728 1,864 1,864 1,984 1,984
Baltimore Village Curbside SC 3,048 762 3,288 822 3,500 875
Lithopolis Village Curbside NSC 1,136 1,136 1,225 1,225 1,304 1,304
Carroll Village Curbside NSC 581 581 619 619
Pleasantville Village Curbside NSC 1,064 1,064 1,132 1,132
VII-5
Sugar Grove Curbside 1,076 1,076 1,147 1,147

Millersport Village Curbside SC 1,073 268 1,157 289 1,232 308
Pickerington City Curbside SC 18,795 4,699 20,274 5,068 21,582 5,395
Violet Township Curbside SC 19,178 4,795 20,663 5,166 21,996 5,499
Amanda Twp./Amanda Village FS-Rural 2,780 2,500 2,999 2,500 3,192 2,500
Berne Township/Sugar Grove FS-Urban 5,228 5,000 5,639 5,000 6,003 5,000
Bloom Twp./Lithopolis, College View Subdivision FS-Urban 8,700 5,000 9,385 5,000 9,990 5,000
Clearcreek Township at Oakland Grocery FS-Rural 4,168 2,500 4,496 2,500 4,786 2,500
Clearcreek Twp./Stoutsville Village FS-Rural 4,168 2,500 4,496 2,500 4,786 2,500
Greenfield Twp/Carroll at Beaver St. Fire Dept. FS-Urban 5,719 5,000 6,169 5,000 6,567 5,000
Hocking Township - removed at twp request in
FS-Rural 4,801 2,500
2013
Lancaster City at 114 Mt. Ida Ave. FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at Ohio University FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at 1743 E. Main, Community Action FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at Liberty Center FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at Hunter Trace Park FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at the Sheriff's Office FS-Urban 39,821 5,000 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at St. Mark's Parish - Gay St. FS-Urban 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Lancaster at 2095 W. Fair Ave. FS-Urban 42,954 5,000 45,726 5,000
Liberty Twp./Baltimore FS-Urban 8,134 5,000 8,774 5,000 9,340 5,000
Pickerington/Violet Twp. at Hill Rd. - removed at
FS-Urban 37,862 5,000
village's request in mid-2012
Pickerington/Violet Twp. At Center/Stemen Rd FS-Urban 37,862 5,000 40,841 5,000 43,476 5,000
Pleasant Twp./Lancaster - Tiki Lane FS-Urban 6,250 5,000 6,742 5,000 7,177 5,000
Pleasant Twp. at 3005 Lancaster-Thornville Rd.
FS-Urban 6,250 5,000 6,742 5,000 7,177 5,000
NE
Richland Township at Pleasantville Road FS-Rural 2,256 2,500 2,434 2,500 2,591 2,500
Richland Township at 3150 Market St., Rushville FS-Rural 2,434 2,500 2,591 2,500
Rushcreek Township/Bremen Drop off FS-Rural 4,000 2,500 4,315 2,500 4,593 2,500
VII-6
Violet Twp at Zeller Park FS-Urban 37,862 5,000 40,841 5,000 43,476 5,000
Violet Twp. at Ohio University Pickerington Center FS-Urban 37,862 5,000 40,841 5,000 43,476 5,000
Violet Twp. at Trinity Family Life Center FS-Urban 37,862 5,000 40,841 5,000 43,476 5,000
Walnut Township Drop-off - township building
FS-Urban 7,030 5,000 7,583 5,000 8,072 5,000
(moved from Micro Materials on Rt. 37)
one urban or
Additional Dropoff(s) to Maintain Access by 2017 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
2 rural
one urban or
Additional Dropoff(s) to Maintain Access by 2020 5,000 5,000
2 rural
Additional Dropoff(s) to Maintain Access by 2023 One rural 2,500 2,500
Total Fairfield County Population 138,599 123,178 149,504 137,323 159,150 146,264
Licking County
Pataskala City Curbside NSC 15,215 15,215 15,990 15,990 16,682 16,682
Etna Township Curbside SC 7,675 1,919 8,066 2,016 8,415 2,104
McKean Township Curbside SC 1,628 407 1,698 425
Bowling Green Twp. (Big-O) SC 1,777 444 1,867 467 1,948 487
Granville Village (Big-O) SC 5,741 1,435 6,033 1,508 6,295 1,574
Granville Twp. (Big-O) (less Granville Village) SC 4,197 1,049 4,411 1,103 4,602 1,150
Harrison Twp. (Big-O) SC 7,519 1,880 7,845 1,895
Heath City (Big-O) SC 10,484 2,621 11,018 2,754 11,495 2,874
Hebron Village (Big-O) SC 2,375 594 2,496 624 2,604 651
Madison Township (Big-O) SC 3,265 816 3,431 858 3,580 895
Jersey Township (Big-O) SC 2,786 697 2,928 732 3,055 764
Johnstown Village (Big-O) NSC 4,710 4,710 4,950 4,950 5,164 5,164
Liberty Township (Big-O) SC 2,400 600 2,522 631 2,631 658
Monroe Township (Big-O) SC 2,353 588 2,473 618 2,580 645
Newark City (multiple haulers) SC 48,376 12,094 50,839 12,710 53,041 13,260
St. Albans Twp. (Big-O) SC 1,962 491 2,062 515 2,151 538
VII-7
Union Township (Big-O) SC 3,779 945 3,971 993 4,143 1,036

Bennington Twp. At SBC Recycling FS-Rural 1,715 2,500 1,802 2,500 1,880 2,500
Etna Township at Twp Garage FS-Urban 7,675 5,000 8,066 5,000 8,415 5,000
Fallsbury Township at Township Hall FS-Rural 1,049 2,500 1,094 2,500
Franklin Township - at Twp Fire Station FS-Rural 2,154 2,500 2,264 2,500 2,362 2,500
Granville Twp./Granville Village Denison University
FS-Urban 9,938 5,000 10,444 5,000 10,896 5,000
Recycling Barn
Granville Twp./Granville Village on Lancaster Rd. FS-Urban 9,938 5,000 10,444 5,000 10,896 5,000
Hanover Twp./ Hanover Village Shopping Center FS-Rural 2,751 2,500 2,891 2,500 3,016 2,500
Harrison Twp. in Outville FS-Urban 7,689 5,000 8,081 5,000 8,430 5,000
Hartford Twp./Croton FS-Rural 1,455 2,500 1,529 2,500 1,595 2,500
Heath in the Municipal Parking Lot FS-Urban 10,484 5,000 11,018 5,000 11,495 5,000
Jersey Township at Mink Rd. FS-Rural 2,786 2,500 2,928 2,500 3,055 2,500
Liberty Township at Northridge Rd. FS-Rural 2,400 2,500 2,522 2,500 2,631 2,500
FS-
Licking Township at Fire Station 4,950 2,500 5,164 5,000
Rural/Urban
Mary Ann Township at Wilkins Corner FS-Rural 2,152 2,500 2,262 2,500 2,360 2,500
McKean Township at Fredonia FS-Rural 1,549 2,500 1,628 2,500 1,698 2,500
Monroe Twp./Johnstown at Village Office FS-Urban 7,063 5,000 7,423 5,000 7,744 5,000
Newark at 1000 Granville Rd. FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Newark at Cherry Valley Rd. and Reddington Rd. FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Newark on 877 E Main St. FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Newark on Deo Drive -moved in 2013 to Myrtle
FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Ave.
Newark on Everett Ave. FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Newark on W. Church Street at Flory Park FS-Urban 48,376 5,000 50,839 5,000 53,041 5,000
Newton Twp./St. Louisville FS-Rural 3,273 2,500 3,440 2,500 3,589 2,500
St. Albans Twp./Alexandria FS-Rural 2,488 2,500 2,615 2,500 2,728 2,500
Union Twp./Hebron at Canal Park FS-Urban 8,931 5,000 9,386 5,000 9,792 5,000
Union Twp./Hebron Industrial Park FS-Urban 8,931 5,000
VII-8
Washington Twp./Utica FS-Rural 3,162 2,500 3,323 2,500 3,467 2,500

one urban or
Additional Dropoffs to Maintain Access by 2015 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
2 rural
Additional Dropoff(s) to Maintain Access by 2019 1 rural 2,500 2,500
Total Licking County Population 159,634 143,137 167,763 152,888 175,029 162,358
Perry County
Somerset Village Curbside SC 1,532 383 1,572 393
Bearfield Twp. at Hunter's Run FS-Rural 1,692 2,500 1,735 2,500 1,780 2,500
Clayton Twp. at Saltillo FS-Rural 1,579 2,500 1,619 2,500 1,661 2,500
Coal Twp./New Straitsville FS-Rural 1,051 2,500 1,078 2,500 1,106 2,500
Harrison Twp./Crooksville FS-Rural 5,299 5,000 5,435 5,000 5,575 5,000
Harrison Twp./Roseville FS-Rural 5,299 5,000 5,435 5,000 5,575 5,000
Hopewell Twp./Glenford FS-Rural 2,421 2,500 2,483 2,500 2,547 2,500
Jackson Twp./Junction City FS-Rural 2,881 2,500 2,955 2,500 3,031 2,500
Monroe Twp./Corning FS-Rural 1,521 2,500 1,560 2,500 1,600 2,500
New Lexington and Pike Twp. near Senior Citizens
FS-Urban 6,984 5,000 7,163 5,000 7,348 5,000
Center
New Lexington and Pike Twp. at MRDD offices FS-Urban 6,984 5,000 7,163 5,000 7,348 5,000
New Lexington and Pike Twp. at 605 N. Main St. FS-Urban 6,984 5,000 7,163 5,000 7,348 5,000
New Lexington and Pike and Clayton Twps. on Rt.
FS-Urban 6,984 5,000 7,163 5,000 7,348 5,000
13 NE at PerCo Inc.
Reading Twp./Somerset at United Methodist
FS-Rural 4,408 2,500
Church
Reading Twp./Somerset at Holy Trinity School,
FS-Rural 4,408 2,500 4,521 2,500 4,638 2,500
then Family Dollar
Salt Lick Twp./Hemlock FS-Rural 1,273 2,500 1,306 2,500 1,339 2,500
Salt Lick Twp./Shawnee FS-Rural 1,273 2,500 1,306 2,500 1,339 2,500
Thorn Twp/Thornport FS-Rural 4,291 2,500 4,401 2,500 4,515 2,500
VII-9
Thorn Twp./Thornville FS-Rural 4,291 2,500 4,401 2,500 4,515 2,500

Thorn Twp./Thornville FS-Rural 4,291 2,500 4,401 2,500 4,515 2,500
Total Perry County Population 37,136 62,500 38,086 60,383 39,071 60,393
Note: If a political jurisdiction or private entity implements residential recycling infrastructure that can count towards the access credit, then the
District may reduce the number of drop-offs that it will implement by the amount of credit specified in the Format for the jurisdiction that has new
infrastructure.
VII-10
c. Participation: Districts must demonstrate meeting the participation standard by:

1) developing and implementing an adequate education program, and 2) evaluating the feasibility of
education programs for promotion of financial incentives to encourage increased recycling and/or
waste reduction.
Education and Outreach: The education and outreach programs through the recycling offices in each
county will be used to educate the public about the residential recycling programs, including
curbside and drop-off recycling opportunities, and to encourage participation. The education and
outreach activities that will support the residential recycling program are described in Chapter V.
The strategies that will be used for promotion of all the residential recycling programs are described
under Goals #3 and #4--residential waste reduction, recycling, reuse, and composting information,
education and technical assistance.
The audience for educational and promotional programs to encourage recycling will be the residents
of the cities, villages, and townships served by curbside and the drop-off programs. The marketing
and outreach plans (page V-20) that the four county recycling offices will prepare each year
specifically address strategies to increase participation in residential recycling programs.
Even though the marketing and outreach strategies are listed under Goals #3 and #4, they can and
will be used to support Goal #1.
Financial incentives: Virtually all waste hauling is done by private waste haulers and the haulers have
not been anxious to adopt volume based rate programs. Past experience with subsidies show that
programs relying on subsidies do not last. The District will support efforts by communities to gain
state grant funding for implementation or expansion of recycling programs.
The AbiBow Paper Retriever program provides a financial incentive and is projected to continue. The
organizations that sponsor bins receive payment from paper sales. A number of the participating
organizations put significant effort into attracting as much paper as possible to the bin. Although the
financial incentive does not go directly to the individual residential recycler, people are motivated by
the opportunity to help local schools, churches and other non-profit organizations.
2. Demonstration of Compliance with Commercial/Institutional Standards
This sector includes retail and wholesale business, schools, banks, government office buildings, and
similar businesses and organizations. In order to demonstrate compliance with plan standards the
District must address the following:
a. Service area: Since most of the recycling opportunities for business are commercial recycling
enterprises that pick up materials, the county boundaries are not particularly relevant.
Therefore, the entire District is considered to be the service area.
b. Access: In order to meet the access standards the District must demonstrate that there are
recycling services available to this sector which handles five of the seven materials used to
meet the overall recycling goal. The materials designated for this sector are office paper,
corrugated cardboard, newspaper, and aluminum cans and steel cans.
VII-11
Table VII-2A shows some of the services that are currently in place to demonstrate access for this
sector. (Commercial materials, particularly materials generated in large quantities may be recycled
through out-of-district brokers, scrap yards, and end-use industries in near-by counties that are not
included in this list.) The District will encourage haulers that service commercial establishments to
continue or expand services.
c. Participation: The District must demonstrate that education/outreach strategies, developed

and targeted at the commercial/institutional sector are in place to meet the access and
participation standards. The strategies that meet this requirement are listed and explained in
Chapter V, under the programs to meet Goals #3 and #4 which begins on page V-19.
Table VII-2A Commercial Recycling Access
Materials Accepted for

Facility/Activity Type of Facility/Activity
Recycling
Rural and urban drop-offs Aluminum cans, steel

Rural and urban drop-offs in all four counties, cans, corrugated
in all four counties locations listed in Table VII- cardboard, steel cans,
2. office paper
Aluminum cans,
Skip's Refuse and Private drop-off, scrap
Recycling (Coshocton Co.) recycler
steel cans, newspaper
Newsprint, corrugated
Rock Tenn End use industry
cardboard, office paper
Aluminum cans, and

Coshocton Recycling Scrap recycler steel cans, plus ferrous
and non-ferrous scrap
AbiBow Paper Retriever
Bins (Fairfield and Licking Paper drop-off bins Office paper, newspaper
Counties)
Aluminum cans,
Drop-off and buy-back,
Community Action corrugated cardboard,
commercial collection
Recycling (Fairfield County) steel cans, office paper ,
services in Fairfield County
newspaper
Aluminum cans, and
Hines Scrap Iron
Scrap recycler steel cans, plus ferrous
2 locations )Fairfield Co.)
Kraner Metals Aluminum cans and
Scrap recycler
(Fairfield County) non-ferrous metal
Corrugated cardboard,
Ohio Paperboard Corp.
End use industry newspaper and office
(Fairfield County)
paper
VII-12
Materials Accepted for

Facility/Activity Type of Facility/Activity
Recycling
Aluminum cans, and
Sierra Metals (Fairfield
County)
Aluminum cans,
SBC Recycling (Licking corrugated cardboard,
Scrap recycler, MRF,
County) steel cans, office paper,
newspaper
Hope Timber (Licking Wood and wood pallets
Wood and wood pallets
County) processor
Aluminum cans, and
Crispin Auto Wrecking
(Licking County)
Sherman Iron & Metal Aluminum cans, and
1001 E. Main St. Scrap recycler steel cans, plus ferrous
Newark, OH 43055 and non-ferrous scrap
740-344-4620
Legend Metals
923 Buckeye Ave. Aluminum smelter Aluminum cans
Newark, OH 43055
740-344-2387
Aluminum cans,
PerCo, Inc. (Perry County) MRF, Buy-Back, Drop-off,
steel cans, office paper ,
newspaper
Big-O Refuse (Licking and
part of Fairfield County)
Corrugated cardboard,
Republic Services (all
Commercial and industrial other materials
counties)
recycling collection including paper, ferrous
Rumpke (Licking and
container services and non-ferrous metals,
Fairfield Counties)
newspaper
(all four counties)
C. Calculating Goal #2, the Waste Reduction Rate
The 2009 State Plan encourages districts to implement programs which will lead to compliance with
Goal #1 and Goal #2 of the State Plan, but compliance with only one of the two goals is required.
Goal #2 in the 2009 State Plan: a) 25 percent waste reduction rate for residential/commercial
sector, and b) 66 percent waste reduction rate for the industrial sector.
As of the reference year, the District was in compliance with the residential/commercial component
of Goal #2 but has not attained the required industrial recycling rate.
VII-13
Using the formulas as shown below the residential/commercial and the industrial waste reduction
rates (WRR) and per capita waste reduction rates (PCWR) are calculated for the CFLP District for the
reference year and each year of the planning period. The results of the calculations for
residential/commercial waste are entered on Table VII-3. The results for industrial waste are
entered on Table VII-4. The results for the total CFLP District waste are entered on Table VII-5.
Calculation of tons waste reduction (TWR):
TWR = Ri + (Ci - NCi) + (Ii-Ai) + RAi

where:
TWRi = Tons of Waste Reduction for year i
Ri = tons of waste source reduced and recycled in year i
Ci = tons of waste Composted in year i
NCi = tons of Non-Compostables delivered for composting and separated for landfilling
Ii = tons of waste Incinerated in year i
Ai = tons of incinerator ash and by-pass waste in year i
RAi = tons of Recycled incinerator Ash in year i
Calculation of estimated generation based on disposal and waste reduction amounts (EGDWR):
EGDWRi = TWRi + DLi
Where
EGDWRi = Estimated Generation based on Disposal and Waste Reduction in year i
Dli = tons of waste Disposal in Sanitary Landfills
Calculation of waste reduction rate (WRR):

WRRi = TWRi x 100
EGSWRi
where
WRRi = Waste Reduction Rate in year i as a percent
Calculation of per capita waste reduction per day (PCWR)
PCWRi = TWRi x 2000 lbs.

Pi x 365
where
PCWRi = Per Capita Waste Reduction per day in year i
Pi = the Population of the RCRSWMA in year i
The following data sources, assumptions and definitions are used in the calculations for Table VII-3,
Table VII-4 and Table VII-5:
R - Tons of Source Reduction and Recycling.

The values for R for residential/commercial waste are taken from Table VI-2. Note that R includes
yard waste composting.
The values for industrial waste are taken from Table V-6. Note that the industrial recycling total used
for R does not, by virtue of exclusions in the State Plan, include train boxcars, ferrous metals from
VII-14
motor vehicle salvage operations or metals from demolition activities.
C - Tons of Municipal Solid Waste Composted. For all of the following Tables the value of C is zero.
No MSW from the CFLP District is composted. Yard waste composting is included in the value of R.
Also, note that the amount of non-compostable and by-pass waste from yard waste composting is
assumed to be negligible so the value of NC is always entered as zero.
DL - Tons Waste Disposed in Landfills. The values for DL for residential/commercial waste are taken
from Table VI-2. The values for DL for industrial waste are taken from Table VI-3. The values for DL
for total waste are taken from Table VI-1.
Two tables ( Table VII-4b and Table VII-5b) have been added to illustrate the waste reduction rates
that would be calculated if the residual FGD material from the AEP Conesville Power Plant was not
included. It clearly shows that the District had already attained Goal #2 and could sustain that
waste reduction rate if not for this one waste stream.
VII-15
Table VII-3 Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Residential and Commercial
Year R C NC I A RA DL TWR P WRR PCWR

2015 105,707 6,880 0 4 0.5 0 278,349 112,591 382,042 28.8% 1.61
2016 110,567 6,945 0 4 0.5 0 277,118 117,517 385,267 29.8% 1.67
2017 115,428 7,011 0 4 0.5 0 275,892 122,443 388,491 30.7% 1.73
2018 120,289 7,076 0 4 0.5 0 274,675 127,369 391,717 31.7% 1.78
2019 125,150 7,141 0 4 0.5 0 273,465 132,295 394,942 32.6% 1.84
2020 129,706 7,207 0 4 0.5 0 272,565 136,917 398,167 33.4% 1.88
2021 134,809 7,280 0 4 0.5 0 271,553 142,093 401,814 34.4% 1.94
2022 139,912 7,354 0 4 0.5 0 270,549 147,269 405,462 35.2% 1.99
2023 141,280 7,427 0 4 0.5 0 273,290 148,711 409,112 35.2% 1.99
2024 143,198 7,501 0 4 0.5 0 275,486 150,703 412,759 35.4% 2.00
2025 144,608 7,575 0 4 0.5 0 278,199 152,187 416,407 35.4% 2.00
R- Tons of residential/commercial recycling from Table VI-2.
C - Tons yard waste composted from Table VI-2.
NC - Non-compostable delivered for landfilling
I - Incineration from Table VI-2
A - Ash from incineration sent for disposal
RA - Ash recycled
DL - Tons for disposal in landfills from Table VI-2
TWR - Tons waste reduced is R + C + I
P - Population
WRR - Tons TWR divided by waste generation which is DL + TWR
PCWR - pounds per person per day
VII-16
Table VII-4A Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Industrial

2015 619,544 0 0 0 0 0 821,587 619,544 382,042 43.0% 8.89
2016 617,425 0 0 0 0 0 836,581 617,425 385,267 42.5% 8.78
2017 615,317 0 0 0 0 0 851,982 615,317 388,491 41.9% 8.68
2018 613,220 0 0 0 0 0 867,795 613,220 391,717 41.4% 8.58
2019 611,133 0 0 0 0 0 884,029 611,133 394,942 40.9% 8.48
2020 609,057 0 0 0 0 0 900,690 609,057 398,167 40.3% 8.38
2021 606,991 0 0 0 0 0 917,785 606,991 401,814 39.8% 8.28
2022 604,936 0 0 0 0 0 935,322 604,936 405,462 39.3% 8.18
2023 602,891 0 0 0 0 0 953,308 602,891 409,112 38.7% 8.07
2024 600,857 0 0 0 0 0 971,751 600,857 412,759 38.2% 7.98
2025 598,832 0 0 0 0 0 990,660 598,832 416,407 37.7% 7.88
R- Tons of residential/commercial recycling from Table VI-3. (2007 from Table IV-3)
C - Tons yard waste composted
I - Incineration
RA - Ash recycled
TWR - Tons waste reduced is same as R
P - Population
VII-17
Table VII-4.B Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Industrial without FGD Waste stream

2015 419,544 0 0 0 0 0 112,025 419,544 382,042 78.9% 6.02
2016 417,425 0 0 0 0 0 108,828 417,425 385,267 79.3% 5.94
2017 415,317 0 0 0 0 0 105,674 415,317 388,491 79.7% 5.86
2018 413,220 0 0 0 0 0 102,561 413,220 391,717 80.1% 5.78
2019 411,133 0 0 0 0 0 99,490 411,133 394,942 80.5% 5.70
2020 409,057 0 0 0 0 0 96,460 409,057 398,167 80.9% 5.63
2021 406,991 0 0 0 0 0 93,471 406,991 401,814 81.3% 5.55
2022 404,936 0 0 0 0 0 90,521 404,936 405,462 81.7% 5.47
2023 402,891 0 0 0 0 0 87,612 402,891 409,112 82.1% 5.40
2024 400,857 0 0 0 0 0 84,741 400,857 412,759 82.5% 5.32
2025 398,832 0 0 0 0 0 81,910 398,832 416,407 83.0% 5.25
R- Tons of residential/commercial recycling from Table VI-3. (2007 from Table IV-3)
C - Tons yard waste composted
I - Incineration
RA - Ash recycled
TWR - Tons waste reduced is same as R
P - Population
VII-18
Table VII-5A. Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Total District Solid Waste

2015 725,251 6,880 0 4 0.5 0 1,099,932 732,135 382,042 40.0% 10.50
2016 727,993 6,945 0 4 0.5 0 1,113,695 734,942 385,267 39.8% 10.45
2017 730,746 7,011 0 4 0.5 0 1,127,870 737,760 388,491 39.5% 10.41
2018 733,509 7,076 0 4 0.5 0 1,142,467 740,589 391,717 39.3% 10.36
2019 736,283 7,141 0 4 0.5 0 1,157,490 743,428 394,942 39.1% 10.31
2020 738,763 7,207 0 4 0.5 0 1,173,251 745,974 398,167 38.9% 10.27
2021 741,800 7,280 0 4 0.5 0 1,189,334 749,084 401,814 38.6% 10.22
2022 744,848 7,354 0 4 0.5 0 1,205,867 752,205 405,462 38.4% 10.17
2023 744,171 7,427 0 4 0.5 0 1,226,595 751,602 409,112 38.0% 10.07
2024 744,055 7,501 0 4 0.5 0 1,247,234 751,560 412,759 37.6% 9.98
2025 743,440 7,575 0 4 0.5 0 1,268,855 751,019 416,407 37.2% 9.88
R- Tons of residential/commercial recycling from Table VII-3 and VII-4.
C - Tons yard waste composted from Table VII-3.
RA - Ash recycled
DL - Tons for disposal in landfills from Table VI-1 and includes Exempt Waste
TWR - Tons waste reduced is sum of R + C + I
P - Population
VII-19
Table VII-5B Annual Rate of Waste Reduction: Total District Solid Waste - Excluding FGD Waste Stream
2015 525,251 6,880 0 4 0.5 0 390,371 532,135 382,042 57.7% 7.63
2016 527,993 6,945 0 4 0.5 0 385,942 534,942 385,267 58.1% 7.61
2017 530,746 7,011 0 4 0.5 0 381,562 537,760 388,491 58.5% 7.58
2018 533,509 7,076 0 4 0.5 0 377,233 540,589 391,717 58.9% 7.56
2019 536,283 7,141 0 4 0.5 0 372,951 543,428 394,942 59.3% 7.54
2020 538,763 7,207 0 4 0.5 0 369,022 545,974 398,167 59.7% 7.51
2021 541,800 7,280 0 4 0.5 0 365,020 549,084 401,814 60.1% 7.49
2022 544,848 7,354 0 4 0.5 0 361,067 552,205 405,462 60.5% 7.46
2023 544,171 7,427 0 4 0.5 0 360,899 551,602 409,112 60.4% 7.39
2024 544,055 7,501 0 4 0.5 0 360,224 551,560 412,759 60.5% 7.32
2025 543,440 7,575 0 4 0.5 0 360,105 551,019 416,407 60.5% 7.25
R- Tons of residential/commercial recycling from Table VII-3 and VII-4.
C - Tons yard waste composted from Table VII-3.
RA - Ash recycled
DL - Tons for disposal in landfills from Table VI-1 and includes Exempt Waste
TWR - Tons waste reduced is sum of R + C + I
P - Population
VII-20
VIII. Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation [ORC Section 3734.53(A) (9),
(12) and (B)]
A. Funding Mechanisms and Amount of Money Generated
1. District Disposal Fees (ORC Section 3734.57(B))
The District will continue to use a disposal fee for the entire planning period, assuming no legislative
changes eliminate or limit disposal fees. At the present time the District disposal fee is $1.25 per
ton for in-district (Tier I) and out-of-state (Tier III) wastes, and $3.50 per ton for out-of-district waste
(Tier II). With the ratification of this plan, the following fees will be approved: On January 1, 2016,
the disposal fees will increase to $2.00 per ton for in-district and out-of-state waste, and $4.00 per
ton for out-of-district waste and remain at that rate through the entire planning period. The fees that
are set in this Plan are necessary to provide adequate funding to continue the programs described in
this Plan.
There are currently three publicly available landfills in the District that are taking in waste and collecting
district disposal fees for the CFLP District. The table showing the tonnage on which district disposal fees
were paid from 2002 through 2013 is included in Appendix H of this Plan.
The fee revenue projected on Table VIII-1 is based on projections of the amount of in-district, out-of-
district, and out-of-state non-exempt waste that will be accepted at publicly available in-District
landfills during the planning period. The amounts are based on 20 years of historical data for waste
receipts through 2013 and on information obtained in 2014.
Overall waste disposal has decreased by Coshocton and Perry Counties since 1998, has remained
level by Licking, and has increased by Fairfield. Overall, district disposal increased 1998-2005,
peaked and then decreased back to 1998 levels in 2013. The percentage of our waste disposed in
other districts has fluctuated between 9% and 17% since 1999, and will continue to fluctuate as
haulers win and lose contracts.
Waste disposed here by other districts has decreased dramatically since 1998: from almost
828,000 tons to 166,000 tons. The biggest factor was the decision by SWACO (Franklin County) to
limit exports of their waste to other districts.
Out-of-state waste comprised less than 2% of fee tons accepted in 1998, but grew to 51% in 2012.
The decrease in out-of-district waste combined with the influx of waste from New York and New
Jersey as well as fracking waste from Pennsylvania account for this increase. However, the fracking
waste decreased in 2013 and is not predictable as a revenue source. The diversion of this material
to upcoming beneficial use projects, or a decision by the state to exempt it from disposal fees could
eliminate all revenue from this waste stream at any time. In 2013, out-of-state waste accounted for
37% of fee tons. Because of the rail access to Tunnell Hill Landfill and the investment from the east
coast, out-of-state waste is projected to remain fairly steady for the next ten years with only minor
decreases.
The District is predicting a very small decrease in waste receipts during the planning period
consistent with the historical downward trend. An analysis of the waste receipts at in-district
VIII-1
landfills over the past fifteen years shows little or no growth in the past five years with the exception
of Tunnell Hill which is new. (See Appendix H) The amount of waste received leveled off before the
economic downturn of 2008 and 2009. As noted in chapter VI and VII of this Plan, the District
expects a decrease in in-district waste for disposal over the duration of the planning period.
Because these landfills are privately owned and must seek new business to remain profitable, it is
expected that they will become more competitive for existing in-district waste or seek new out-of-
district and out-of-state contracts. The table in Appendix H contains 2007-2013 disposed tons upon
which fees were paid. This was used as the basis for fee projections.
Table VIII-1. District Disposal Fee Schedule and Revenues Generated
Fee Schedule ($/Ton) Estimated Disposed in District

Total District
Year In- Out-of- Out-of-
In-District Out-of-District Out-of-State Fee Revenue
District District State
2015 $1.25 $3.50 $1.25 278,877 167,157 274,841 $1,277,195
2016 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 277,483 166,321 273,467 $1,767,182
2017 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 276,096 165,489 272,099 $1,758,346
2018 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 274,715 164,662 270,739 $1,749,554
2019 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 273,341 163,838 269,385 $1,740,807
2020 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 271,975 163,019 268,038 $1,732,103
2021 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 270,615 162,204 266,698 $1,723,442
2022 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 269,262 161,393 265,365 $1,714,825
2023 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 267,916 160,586 264,038 $1,706,251
2024 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 266,576 159,783 262,717 $1,697,720
2025 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 265,243 158,984 261,404 $1,689,231
The revenues are rounded.
Sample calculation for 2015: $3.50 out-of-district fee x 167,157 tons = $585,049
$1.25 in-district fee x 278,877 = $348,596
$1.25 out-of-state fee x 274,841 = $343,551
Total revenue = $585,049 + $348,596 + $343,551 = $1,277,196
2. Generation Fee (ORC Section 3734.573)
Ratified with the previous plan update, the District imposed a solid waste generation fee of $2.00
per ton continuing for the entire planning period in accordance with Section 3734.573 of the Ohio
Revised Code. With the ratification of this plan, this fee decreases to $1.25 beginning January 1,
2016 and remains constant during the planning period to cover the increasing cost to provide
services.
The generation fee will be paid on each ton of municipal solid waste generated in the District and
delivered to an Ohio transfer facility or a publicly-available Ohio landfill for disposal. The amount of
waste entered for each year of the planning period on Table VIII-2 is the amount of waste on which
the generation fee is expected to be collected (See Appendix H). The fee is collected on municipal
solid waste which includes residential, commercial and industrial waste. The fee is not collected on
VIII-2
exempt waste or waste deposited in captive landfills. Although waste generated for disposal
increased from 1998 to 2005, it declined even before the economic recession and now stands at
1998 levels. It is therefore projected to continue decreasing slightly each year for the entire
planning period, recognizing that there will be normal annual fluctuations.
Table VIII-2. Generation Fee Schedule and Revenues
Amount of District Waste for Disposal Total

Year Generation Fee
based on Revised Disposal Figures Generation Fee
2015 $2.00 390,371 $780,742

2016 $1.25 385,942 $482,428
2017 $1.25 381,562 $476,953
2018 $1.25 377,233 $471,541
2019 $1.25 372,951 $466,189
2020 $1.25 369,022 $461,278
2021 $1.25 365,020 $456,275
2022 $1.25 361,067 $451,334
2023 $1.25 360,899 $451,124
2024 $1.25 360,224 $450,280
2025 $1.25 360,105 $450,131
3. Summary of District Revenues
The above listed disposal fee and generation fee are the funding mechanisms to be used by the
District. Other income received will include interest on the solid waste account, and income from
miscellaneous sources like reimbursement of contracts given but not spent, or reimbursement for
District funded equipment as it is retired from use. The miscellaneous income is usually minimal
and cannot be predicted so, with the exception of 2012, it is not included in the revenue projections
that follow. Projected interest income is included in Table VIII-3.
4. Contingency Funding Source
The Ohio EPA has stated publicly that it is their intent to change the fee structure used by solid waste
management districts. If that happens during this planning period, it poses the risk of limiting the
projected revenue to the point where programs cannot be implemented. Therefore, the District reserves
the right under ORC 343.014 to establish facility designations by the District in return for a designation
fee, in accordance with the requirements of ORC 3734.53(E)(1) to contain a clear statement permitting
designation. The amount of the fee will be calculated if and when needed to provide funding for the
programs within this solid waste management plan.
VIII-3
Table VIII-3. Summary of Revenue Generated and Mechanisms Used
Reimbursement
District Disposal Projected
Year Generation Fee of Unspent Total
Fee Interest Income
Funds
2015 $1,277,195 $780,742 $12,000 $2,069,937
2016 $1,767,182 $482,428 $12,000 $2,261,610
2017 $1,758,346 $476,953 $12,000 $2,247,299
2018 $1,749,554 $471,541 $12,000 $2,233,096
2019 $1,740,807 $466,189 $12,000 $2,218,995
2020 $1,732,103 $461,278 $12,000 $2,205,380
2021 $1,723,442 $456,275 $12,000 $2,191,717
2022 $1,714,825 $451,334 $12,000 $2,178,159
2023 $1,706,251 $451,124 $12,000 $2,169,375
2024 $1,697,720 $450,280 $12,000 $2,160,000
2025 $1,689,231 $450,131 $12,000 $2,151,362
Interest is calculated at .003 annual rate. Interest revenue decreases as the amount of reserve funds on
which the interest is paid decreases, however the district will explore investment opportunities to offset
that decrease by earning better interest rates.
The District does not anticipate the need for loans during the planning period. Table VIII-4, "Anticipated
Loans Secured by the District" is, therefore, omitted.
B. Cost of Plan Implementation
The following table, “Cost of Plan Implementation”, lists the facilities, strategies, programs and
activities which the District may fund to implement this Plan. The activities and programs listed in
Table VIII-5 include programs that are required for Plan implementation and optional programs,
which are not required, but which are directly related to the safe and environmentally sound
management of solid waste. District administration is listed first. Then the mandatory programs that
specifically address the State Solid Waste Management Plan goals are listed. When possible the
programs are listed in the same order as they appear in the Implementation Schedule, Table VI-5.
Some of the required goal related activities cannot be broken out as individual line items and will be
accomplished through staff or programs that are listed elsewhere in the table.
Table VIII-5 is a planning tool. More than 20 years of history provides a sound basis for developing
the annual costs of maintaining or expanding the mandatory programs. The District is committed to
implementing the mandatory programs in a cost-effective manner. Failure to expend the full amount
included in this Plan for a facility, activity or service should not be considered as evidence that the
Plan is not being fully or appropriately implemented. In addition, nothing contained in these cost
projections should be construed as a binding commitment by the District to provide a specified
amount of money for a particular program, activity or service. The District Board of Directors, with
the advice and assistance of District staff and the Policy Committee, will review and revise the
annual District budget as needed to implement planned programs and activities as effectively as
possible with the funds that are available.
VIII-4
One challenge faced by multi-county solid waste districts where the member counties differ in
population, geographic size and types of facilities is the equitable division of funds. This District
began in 1989 budgeting all funds by activity and distributing funds to member counties based on
requests for those activities. However, it was soon felt that reliance solely upon requests resulted in
an inequitable division of funds. For a number of years, the District used distribution formulas to
ensure that counties hosting landfills received extra financial consideration each year to compensate
for the environmental and economic impact of those facilities. However, this created a disconnect
between the projected programmatic needs that drove the annual budget and the amount available
to actually carry out those programs. Beginning with the 2010 plan update, funds were distributed
based upon the needs identified in the solid waste plan, with the limited funding for optional
programs divided based on a formula that incorporated a consideration for counties hosting landfills.
In total, no matter what method has been used to distribute funds, Coshocton County has spent
approximately 16% of the annual expenditures, Fairfield 30%, Licking 30% and Perry 24% (rounded
to the nearest 1%). For this plan update, the District began the budgeting process with the
distribution of projected revenue to each county using these percentages. Each county created a ten
year budget that could be sustained with their projected available funds. This process incorporates
the past practice of giving extra consideration to counties that host active landfills in a way that
maintains the integrity of the plan budget.
It has long been the policy of the District that if a member county realizes a savings within its
programming, they may use the savings to expand their programs within the solid waste plan. This
gives each county the incentive to be fiscally conservative for the benefit of its constituents.
Therefore, if a county spends less than the projected amount in Tables 5 on a specific program, the
savings will be reserved for that county's use rather than reallocated to another county.
Explanation of entries on Table VIII-5 and Table VIII-8
The following is a discussion of the financial considerations affecting the programs and strategies
that will be used to implement this Plan. The programs that will be used to implement Plan goals are
described in detail in Chapters V and VII of this Plan and in the Implementation Schedule in Chapter
VI. Only items for which the District plans to expend funds are listed on Table VIII-5.
1. Preparation of the solid waste management plan of the district, monitoring implementation of
the plan, and conducting periodic review and amendment of the plan
District Costs for Administration and Programs: The projected costs for the District office and for
District administration are based on actual costs in 2012 and 2013 and includes the following:
salaries for 2 full time staff with benefits including public employees retirement, medical insurance,
and payroll taxes; office supplies; postage; travel; subscriptions and memberships; telephone;
internet; office rent; equipment purchase; equipment maintenance; accounting; public records
management and auditing. Inflation factors are tailored to each expense based on historical
increases: Salary and medical insurance used a 3% annual increase, payroll taxes used a 1% annual
increase. State audit expenses occur in even numbered years. Office space rental used 4% annual
increases. Auditor/treasurer services used 2% annual increases. No inflation factor was used for
supplies, travel, equipment maintenance, postage or subscriptions. As the cost of postage
VIII-5
increases, our use of electronic communications increases, allowing that item to remain flat except
in years when the plan update occurs.
The majority of the administrative budget supports all of the District’s functions and fulfills Goal #9.
The District office also provides waste reduction and recycling information and technical assistance
for industrial waste generators.
The costs of legal services and professional services to assist the District in preparing and
monitoring the District Plan vary from year to year and occur only periodically. Amounts not spent in
one year may be carried over to meet needs in subsequent years so an inflation factor was not
included.
Projected costs to update the plan periodically are contained within the administrative budget and
include subscriptions to industry databases, printing, mailing, and other costs necessary to
implement the periodic review and update required by ORC 3734.57(G)(1). The District realized a
savings of $50,000 every five years by using District staff to update the plan rather than an outside
consultant. The new Format will make it much more cost effective to create future plan updates
(less paper).
2. Implementation of the approved solid waste management plan of the district, including without
limitation, the development and implementation of solid waste recycling and reduction programs.
Recycling Drop-off Operations and Capital Expenditures: The recycling programs that will meet the
requirements of the access goal, Goal #1, are described in Chapter V of this Plan. This Plan requires
that the recycling programs to provide access be continued through the entire planning period and
includes the expectation that the recycling programs will aggressively work to remove more material
from the waste stream each year to meet Goal #2. It is important that each of the county programs
be adequately funded to meet present and future challenges.
Each County Recycling Office was asked to prepare projections for the costs of operations and
capital expenditures for ten years. Factors that were considered included the number of staff, the
amount of fuel, the volume of materials to be processed to maintain present operations and
accommodate growth, need for additional and replacement equipment including trucks, trailers,
and/or containers. To ground the predictions in reality, comparisons were made with expenses for
recent years. Even though the cost projections are based on realistic scenarios for anticipated
needs, actual expenditures may vary. Annual budgets will be responsive to ongoing assessments of
capital needs to maintain efficient program operation. The capital costs are not broken out (i.e.
trucks, trailers, etc.) from operational costs and are part of the contract between the District and
individual counties to provide recycling access.
Rather than using one inflation factor applied to all expenses in every county, inflation factors were
tailored to each line item in each county where appropriate, similar to the method used for District
administration. For example, medical insurance for an employee using only single coverage is vastly
different than medical insurance for an employee in another county for family coverage. Each office
used real numbers for projections based on current staffing. Each county's operation is explained in
detail in Appendix G.
VIII-6
After bidding out residential recycling drop-off collection services to the private sector, Licking County
divested itself of staff and equipment no longer in use. The savings realized by this action resulted in
a large carryover of funding for Licking County going into this plan update. However, the risk of
privatization is the possibility of a lack of competitive bids when it is time to renew the contract. Were
this to happen, it would be necessary to directly provide the services as the county did prior to
privatization. To eliminate any impact on the other three counties should this scenario arise, Licking
County is holding the majority of their savings in reserve, and that reserve is reflected within this plan
budget. With this prudent action, Licking County will have adequate funds to rehire staff and
purchase collection equipment without impacting the other three counties and their budgetary
needs. The longer the contract is successfully privatized, the less of the reserve will be needed, and
Licking County may be able to use it to further expand recycling services and meet future solid waste
diversion responsibilities. This is an example of how the current policy of retaining saved funds
within the county that realized the savings versus redistributing it between all counties benefits the
county taking the action. Using the worst case scenario, this budget would allow Licking County to
collect recyclables using the old cost-ineffective method without negatively impacting other member
counties.
Counties cannot rely upon revenue from the sale of materials to totally offset program costs, but may
use that revenue to address unpredictable spikes in costs - such as the volatile pricing of fuel or the
breakdown of equipment. Both Community Action and Perco retain the revenue realized by selling
processed materials without rebate to the county or District, thus gaining additional funding to
support operations. Additionally, they may apply for grant funding from external sources or use
general fund dollars to supplement District funding. In Coshocton and Licking Counties, the
processor retains revenue from the sale of materials, in return for processing at no cost to the
District.
To ensure that residents receive the best service available at the least cost, counties will continually
monitor and analyze recycling drop-off costs and assess the opportunity for improvement. This
analysis will be included in annual applications for District funding so that any recommended
changes can be implemented smoothly and annual budgets set appropriately.
Where long term cost savings and improved service can be realized, counties will be encouraged to
pursue those changes. Expenditure by the District of less than the budgeted amount in any year of
the planning period due to a change in operations will not be considered a material change
warranting a plan revision, but will be considered sound fiscal management of public dollars. Savings
realized may be used to fund additional recycling programs to increase diversion from landfilling.
Government office and school recycling programs: Each county recycling office has historical data
on the cost of providing recycling collection services to local government offices and public schools.
Because this plan update emphasizes the expansion of services to more facilities, the County
Recycling Offices factored in the increased time and fuel that will be necessary to provide that
service. Costs vary between counties because of the number of facilities to be added, the distance
between facilities, the number of personnel needed to collect materials, and the equipment being
used to transport materials. Costs include personnel, fuel, vehicle maintenance, and periodically,
additional containers. This may turn out costing less than budgeted, however, because school
districts independently contract for waste services, and may prefer to have their hauler provide
recycling as well. Our goal is to increase their recycling regardless of the service provider.
VIII-7
Waste reduction and recycling education programs: The programs that will reach Goal #3 and #4
are described in Chapter V of this Plan. The costs included are based on past experience and
anticipate future needs. Although funding for four individual county programs is included in the
budget, in the event that District revenue is insufficient to adequately fund mandatory programs in
this Plan, the education programs that are required by this Plan to meet State Plan Goals may be
implemented by the District office or a consolidated education program.
“Program administration, Outreach and Education Plan: ” Even though the District reserves the
option of managing the mandatory outreach programs on a District-wide basis, the District’s
preference is to maintain programs in each county which specifically address local needs and
opportunities.
In addition to the outreach functions of the four County Recycling Offices, this line item includes the
cost of adequately staffing and administering all of the programs that are implemented in each of
the four counties and which are detailed in this Plan. In addition to overseeing and implementing
waste reduction and recycling outreach programs, it is expected that local Recycling Office Managers
and staff have solid waste management duties which include many other functions. Examples
include administering recycling contracts, assisting local governments in planning and evaluating
recycling programs and in applying for and administering market development contracts, assisting in
the management of disaster debris, and participating on Solid Waste District committees. Past
experience has shown that it is extremely difficult and inefficient to separate the staff costs and
support expenses for each of these duties. The District funds each program through an annual
contract process which was developed and is implemented to assure that District funding is utilized
to address the requirements of the District Plan.
In order to meet the requirements of State Plan Goals #3 and #4, each County Recycling Office will
create an annual outreach and marketing plan which will clearly define the strategies that will be
used to market to each target audience and will describe how the strategy or program will effect a
change in behavior resulting in increased recycling and waste reduction. Because the Marketing and
Outreach Plan for each county will be tailored to the needs of the county and will change from year to
year as conditions change or new opportunities arise, it is impossible to break out their future
activities into line items and assign arbitrary costs to them. Rather, each County Recycling Office will
submit an annual funding application that includes activities for the following year, with a budget
that will be approved by the District Board of Directors. Approved expenditures will be based on the
needs identified in the marketing plans and will be included in annual contract process. Projections
of cost for these programs is based on historical costs and expected increases in medical insurance,
salaries, and office expenses. Approximately 81% of outreach costs are for salary and fringes. Real
numbers using current staff were used rather than one inflation factor applied to all counties. For
example, Fairfield County knows that it will experience staffing changes in 2016 and budgeted
accordingly. Licking County recently hired an education coordinator and office assistant which
increased their implementation cost.
Optional Programs
There are a number of programs that the District has funded, but that are not required to meet a
specific required plan goal. These programs are contained within Ohio Revised Code, Chapter
3734.57(G)(2-10) and are optional programs which may be implemented at the discretion of the
District Board of Directors.
VIII-8
1. Enforcement/Cleanup/Other Optional: Once the mandatory programs were budgeted, each

county used remaining available funds cover a level of service for enforcement and cleanup
functions that provide value to the district. Counties may tailor programming to fit local needs. These
programs include:
Health Department Enforcement: The Solid Waste Management District relies upon local
health departments to ensure that federal, state, and local solid waste laws and regulations
are followed. While OEPA-approved Health Departments are required to have solid waste
enforcement programs meeting certain minimum standards, district contracts require each
Health Department go beyond the minimum requirements. Therefore, to supplement (not
replace) the existing revenues for solid waste programs, the District may provide contracts
to health departments to inspect facilities, investigate complaints, and prosecute violators.
This contract may also cover time spent by the solid waste sanitarian assisting in the
management of debris following a declared disaster, as specified in the jurisdiction’s
emergency plan for Disaster Debris Management. Costs covered may include salary and
fringes, vehicle expenses, equipment, supplies, and training to maintain the sanitarian’s
registration requirements until OEPA training is created. Approximately 90% of the funding
is salary and fringes. Funding is provided via contracts following an application from the
Health Department for financial assistance.
Well Testing To identify possible health risks to district residents living near solid waste
disposal facilities (for any site contained within the District's solid waste management plan),
Health Departments may test water wells for contamination. Local Health Departments
have developed criteria by which to determine if a request for testing is within their
parameters. Solid Waste District funds may be used for testing near closed or currently
operating facilities, and also background testing adjacent to newly permitted, unconstructed
sites. Funding is provided via contracts following an application from the Health
Department for financial assistance.
Law Enforcement Local law enforcement agencies may receive funding from the Solid
Waste District to assign personnel to enforce litter laws and issue citations for violations.
Litter law enforcement officers work closely with local Recycling offices and local health
departments to ensure coordinated efforts to deter littering. The deputy’s role in handling
debris from declared disasters, as written in the county’s emergency plan may be covered
under this contract. Costs may include salary and fringes, supplies, vehicle expenses,
training and equipment. Approximately 93% of funding covers salary and fringes. Funding is
provided via contracts following an application from the Sheriff Office for financial
assistance.
Dump Cleanup on Public Property Property maintenance is the responsibility of the

landowner, which in the case of public property is the local government or state. Therefore,
local agencies are eligible to apply for funds to clean up dumps on public land and along
roadways and public easements. Applications that request funds for specific dump site
cleanup must include a list of the specific dump sites to be cleaned, a timeline for cleanup,
and the method by which collected materials will be disposed or recycled. Adopt-an-Area
Programs are included in this activity. If a declared disaster occurs within the contractor’s
jurisdiction and assistance in cleanup is required, this program may assist where debris is
VIII-9
located on public property. Approximately 36% of funding covers salary and fringes with the
remainder covering bags, gloves, vehicle maintenance, fuel and disposal of collected waste.
2. HHW Disposal Assistance: In addition to educational efforts, the District budget includes $2,000
every other year to provide targeted recycling assistance. This may include the purchase of pre-paid
CFL lightbulb boxes and/or battery recycling containers for residential drop-off, and disposal of
mercury collected by local health departments. This small allocation will allow the District to provide
periodic services as needed throughout the planning period.
3. County and Township Assistance: Ohio Revised Code allows solid waste districts to use funding
derived from disposal fees to assist counties, townships and municipalities offset additional costs of
maintaining roads and other public facilities, and providing emergency and other public services
where solid waste facilities operate. District funds may not replace funding for activities that would
be occurring if the solid waste facility were not there. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
demonstrate that but for the location and operation of the solid waste facility, the requested
expenses would not be incurred. Funding is provided via contracts following an application from the
County or Township for financial assistance. This assistance has been budgeted at $70,000 in
2015 and $20,000 per year after that, and the unused amount will be reserved within this line item
for future years. Because the District does not, at this time, have contracts or agreements with any
composting, energy or resource recovery, incineration or recycling facility, it is the expectation that
only counties with operating landfills will apply for this funding. However, in the event that there are
changes in facilities or agreements during the planning period, eligible applicants for the funding
may also change.
In addition, there are optional programs which are not included in the District’s budget which may be
funded if revenue exceeds projections or if funded program costs decrease. It is important to note
that these programs are eligible for funding, however, the majority of these programs will not be
funded in any specific year of the Plan and some may never be funded. Allocations will be made
annually as part of the District's normal budgeting and contract process. Failure to fund optional
programs is not considered a material change in circumstances and is not a trigger for a plan
revision.
Waste reduction special projects: Recycling programs to enhance the district-wide drop-off recycling
program may be considered for funding. Programs include feasibility studies, waste minimization,
curbside recycling, food and yard waste composting, expansion or creation of material processing
centers, special collection events, market development activities and the buying of recycled content
items for public use. In order to use district funds, applicants must demonstrate a reduction in the
amount of district waste landfilled as a result of the funded project and provide a cash match.
Funding is provided via contracts following an application for financial assistance.
Dump Cleanup on Private Property Local agencies are responsible for ensuring that open dump
sites do not persist, and that responsible parties are held accountable for clean-up costs. Only local
health departments are eligible to apply for funds to clean up open dumps on private land through
their enforcement process. Private land cannot be cleaned up with District contract funds without
health department enforcement to recover cleanup costs through property liens or assessments, and
any other means available to the department. If a disaster is declared in the contractor’s
jurisdiction, contract funds may be used to assist in the cleanup of disaster debris where other
funding is not available. Funding is provided via contracts following an application from the Health
VIII-10
Department for financial assistance. Historically these projects are very expensive and liens have
not recovered funds from property owners, therefore it is unlikely that funding will be available for
this purpose.
FUND 2, VACATION/SICK PAYOUT The District Board of Directors adopted a policy to take some
responsibility for the separation payments made to employees who devoted their service to the solid
waste district. To implement the policy, a separate fund was established and an amount of funding
is maintained within the fund to cover upcoming retirement payouts. Dollars are transferred from
the primary fund only as needed, and funds are not appropriated until use is requested by a member
county.
The current policy states "In the event of termination of an employee currently funded by a contract
with the solid waste district, who is working no less than 75% of the employee’s time on contract
activities at the time of termination, where the employee is entitled to receive a separation payment
for accrued and unused vacation and/or sick leave from the employer, the District will reimburse the
employer a portion of the payment for vacation and/or sick leave accrued and not used during the
time the employee was paid through this or previous District contracts equal to the percentage of
time the employee devoted to the contracts."
The budgets in Table VIII-5 and Table VIII-8 include this fund to ensure that the entire financial
picture of the District is presented.
VIII-11
Table VIII-5 Cost of Plan Implementation

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
SUB TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 176,793 180,686 180,276 190,114 189,872 204,286 199,283 208,588 208,135 217,928 219,041
Recycling Dropoff- Coshocton 98,714 99,104 81,052 103,057 120,123 87,250 92,250 87,250 87,250 87,250 127,250
Recycling Dropoff - Fairfield 310,734 375,475 382,246 391,419 396,772 403,363 407,871 415,356 413,916 390,908 390,694
Recycling Dropoff - Licking 141,360 265,164 264,164 1,063,664 332,619 333,119 332,619 350,311 350,811 350,311 300,811
Recycling Dropoff - Perry 212,391 208,806 247,222 225,998 235,151 244,696 254,653 295,039 291,874 287,178 298,974
SUB TOTAL RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING 763,199 948,549 974,683 1,784,138 1,084,665 1,068,429 1,087,393 1,147,957 1,143,851 1,115,648 1,117,729
Coshocton SchoolGovt Recycling 11,746 12,098 12,461 12,835 13,220 13,617 14,025 14,446 14,879 15,326 15,786
Fairfield School/Govt Recycling 0 45,408 48,789 49,123 50,134 51,288 52,044 53,136 53,136 53,136 53,136
Licking School/Govt Recycling 71,514 73,659 75,869 123,145 80,490 82,904 85,391 87,953 90,592 93,310 96,109
Perry School/Govt Recycling 26,178 44,963 27,772 28,605 29,464 30,347 31,258 32,196 33,162 34,156 35,181
SUBTOTAL SCHOOL/GOVT RECYCLING 109,438 176,129 164,892 213,709 173,307 178,157 182,719 187,731 191,769 195,928 200,212
Coshocton Program Administration, Outreach and
87,131 91,892 94,262 100,849 103,667 105,854 104,528 102,662 102,803 104,951 103,106
Education Plan
Fairfield Program Administration, Outreach and Education
170,224 154,848 157,451 160,149 161,701 164,542 166,452 169,508 169,508 169,508 169,508
Plan
Licking Program Administration and Outreach and
227,340 206,412 210,540 214,751 219,046 223,427 227,895 232,453 237,102 241,844 246,681
Education Plan
Perry Program Administration and Outreach and Education
110,238 113,544 116,950 120,459 124,072 127,795 131,629 135,577 139,645 143,834 148,149
Plan
SUB TOTAL MARKETING AND OUTREACH 594,932 566,696 579,203 596,207 608,486 621,617 630,503 640,200 649,057 660,136 667,443
Coshocton Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 129,411 148,703 152,180 155,742 159,390 163,128 166,957 170,879 174,897 179,014 183,231
Fairfield Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 99,398 102,794 105,386 108,062 110,825 113,779 116,005 119,052 119,052 119,052 119,052
Licking Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 56,154 94,600 89,600 84,732 79,867 75,004 70,144 70,287 70,433 70,581 70,733
Perry Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 109,965 121,163 124,285 127,594 166,000 134,504 138,108 141,818 145,634 149,560 153,601
HHW Disposal Assistance - - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000
Special Recycling Collection Events 3,000
County or Township Assistance 70,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Transfer to Vacation/Sick Payout Fund 10,000
SUBTOTAL OPTIONAL PROGRAMS 467,928 497,260 493,451 496,130 538,082 506,415 513,214 522,036 532,016 538,208 548,617
TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES 2,112,291 2,369,320 2,392,505 3,280,298 2,594,412 2,578,903 2,613,112 2,706,512 2,724,829 2,727,848 2,753,043
VACATION/SICK PAYOUT FUND 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
TRANSFER IN FROM PRIMARY FUND 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURES 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VIII-12
C. Funds Allocated from ORC 3734.57(B) and ORC 3734.573.
If the District collects revenue from fees authorized under ORC Section 3734.57(B) or ORC
3734.573, allocations of this money must be made in accordance with the requirements of the ORC
Section 3734.57 (G). Since the District is funded by a disposal fee and generation fee, Table VIII-6 is
required. The table shows the amount of money allocated in the allowable categories for each year of
the planning period. The categories are as follows:
"1" - preparation and monitoring of plan implementation;

"2" - implementation of approved plan;
"3" - financial assistance to boards of health for SW enforcement;
"4" - financial assistance to counties within the district to defray the costs of
maintaining roads and other public services related to the location or operation of
solid waste facilities;
"5" - contracts with boards of health for collecting and analyzing samples from water
wells adjacent to solid waste facilities;
"6" - out-of-state waste inspection program;
"7" - financial assistance to local boards of health to enforce ORC 3734.03 or to local
law enforcement agencies having jurisdiction within the district for anti-littering;
"8" - financial assistance to boards of health for employees to participate in Ohio EPA's
training and certification program for solid waste operators and facility inspectors;
"9" - financial assistance to local municipalities and townships to defray the added
cost of roads and services related to the operation of solid waste facilities.
“10” - payment of agreed to expenses to a community in another solid waste district
affected by a new or modified solid waste facility.
The District reserves the right for the District Board of Directors to allocate fees to any of the ten
categories if the Board of Directors identifies a need to fund a program or project and funds are
available without impeding the District’s ability to adequately fund the facilities, programs, and
activities that are designated as required programs in the Implementation Schedule included in
Chapter VI of this Plan and for which funding is not specifically limited or excluded by this Plan.
All of the strategies and programs that are listed in the District’s Plan Implementation Schedule as
“required” and upon which District funds will be spent are strategies and programs that satisfy
category “2” – implementation of the approved plan.
Some of the programs listed in Table VIII-5 under the heading, “OPTIONAL PROGRAMS IF FUNDING IS
AVAILABLE” are expenses that fall under the following categories:
“3”-financial assistance financial assistance to boards of health for SW enforcement;
"4" -financial assistance to counties within the district to defray the costs of maintaining roads and
other public services related to the location or operation of solid waste facilities;
5" - contracts with boards of health for collecting and analyzing samples from water wells adjacent
to solid waste facilities;
7" - financial assistance to local boards of health to enforce ORC 3734.03 or to local law
VIII-13
enforcement agencies having jurisdiction within the district for anti-littering;
Since it is not known which of the optional programs will be funded, the “OPTIONAL PROGRAM”
expenditures are included under purpose “2.”
If revenues fall below projections, the District will prioritize funding the mandatory programs—
programs that are required to by this Plan and which meet stated waste reduction and recycling
goals in this Plan as listed in the Plan Implementation Schedule, Table VI-5.
Table VIII-6 Fund Allocations as Required by ORC
Disposal Fee Generation Other 3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Total Culmulative

Year 1 2
Revenue Fee Revenue Revenue 10 Allocations Balance
Beginning Balance $ 5,090,593
2015 1,277,195 780,742 12,000 1,644,363 467,928 2,112,291 5,048,240
2016 1,767,182 482,428 12,000 1,872,060 497,260 2,369,320 4,940,529
2017 1,758,346 476,953 12,000 1,899,054 493,451 2,392,505 4,795,323
2018 1,749,554 471,541 12,000 2,784,168 496,130 3,280,298 3,748,120
2019 1,740,807 466,189 12,000 2,056,330 538,082 2,594,412 3,372,703
2020 1,732,103 461,278 12,000 2,072,489 506,415 2,578,903 2,999,180
2021 1,723,442 456,275 12,000 2,099,898 513,214 2,613,112 2,577,785
2022 1,714,825 451,334 12,000 2,184,476 522,036 2,706,512 2,049,432
2023 1,706,251 451,124 12,000 2,192,813 532,016 2,724,829 1,493,977
2024 1,697,720 450,280 12,000 2,189,640 538,208 2,727,848 926,129
2025 1,689,231 450,131 12,000 2,204,425 548,617 2,753,043 324,448
D. Summary of Costs and Revenues
Table VIII-8 provides a summary of the expected revenues and projected expenditures. The
expenditure entries on this table correspond directly to Table VIII-5. The program descriptions are
included on Table VIII-5. Only items for which the District plans to expend funds are listed on Table V
VIII.8.
VIII-14
Table VIII-8 Summary of District Revenues and Expenditures

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Beginning balance and carryover 5,090,593 5,048,240 4,940,529 4,795,323 3,748,120 3,372,703 2,999,180 2,577,785 2,049,432 1,493,977 926,129
Revenue
Generation Fee 780,742 482,428 476,953 471,541 466,189 461,278 456,275 451,334 451,124 450,280 450,131
In district disposal fee 348,597 554,966 552,191 549,430 546,683 543,950 541,230 538,524 535,831 533,152 530,486
Out of district disposal fee 585,048 665,283 661,956 658,647 655,353 652,077 648,816 645,572 642,344 639,133 635,937
Out of state disposal fee 343,551 546,933 544,199 541,478 538,770 536,076 533,396 530,729 528,075 525,435 522,808
Interest to Account 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUE 2,069,937 2,261,610 2,247,299 2,233,096 2,218,995 2,205,380 2,191,717 2,178,159 2,169,375 2,160,000 2,151,362
District administrative costs 171,293 175,186 174,776 184,614 184,372 198,786 193,783 203,088 202,635 212,428 213,541
District-wide education-industrial sector (printing,
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
materials, postage, etc.)
Legal 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
Planning - periodic expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SUB TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 176,793 180,686 180,276 190,114 189,872 204,286 199,283 208,588 208,135 217,928 219,041
Recycling Dropoff- Coshocton 98,714 99,104 81,052 103,057 120,123 87,250 92,250 87,250 87,250 87,250 127,250
Recycling Dropoff - Fairfield 310,734 375,475 382,246 391,419 396,772 403,363 407,871 415,356 413,916 390,908 390,694
Recycling Dropoff - Licking 141,360 265,164 264,164 1,063,664 332,619 333,119 332,619 350,311 350,811 350,311 300,811
Recycling Dropoff - Perry 212,391 208,806 247,222 225,998 235,151 244,696 254,653 295,039 291,874 287,178 298,974
SUB TOTAL RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING 763,199 948,549 974,683 1,784,138 1,084,665 1,068,429 1,087,393 1,147,957 1,143,851 1,115,648 1,117,729
Coshocton SchoolGovt Recycling 11,746 12,098 12,461 12,835 13,220 13,617 14,025 14,446 14,879 15,326 15,786
Fairfield School/Govt Recycling 0 45,408 48,789 49,123 50,134 51,288 52,044 53,136 53,136 53,136 53,136
Licking School/Govt Recycling 71,514 73,659 75,869 123,145 80,490 82,904 85,391 87,953 90,592 93,310 96,109
Perry School/Govt Recycling 26,178 44,963 27,772 28,605 29,464 30,347 31,258 32,196 33,162 34,156 35,181
SUBTOTAL SCHOOL/GOVT RECYCLING 109,438 176,129 164,892 213,709 173,307 178,157 182,719 187,731 191,769 195,928 200,212
Coshocton Program Administration, Outreach and
87,131 91,892 94,262 100,849 103,667 105,854 104,528 102,662 102,803 104,951 103,106
Education Plan
Fairfield Program Administration, Outreach and
170,224 154,848 157,451 160,149 161,701 164,542 166,452 169,508 169,508 169,508 169,508
Education Plan
Licking Program Administration and Outreach and
227,340 206,412 210,540 214,751 219,046 223,427 227,895 232,453 237,102 241,844 246,681
Education Plan
Perry Program Administration and Outreach and
110,238 113,544 116,950 120,459 124,072 127,795 131,629 135,577 139,645 143,834 148,149
Education Plan
SUB TOTAL MARKETING AND OUTREACH 594,932 566,696 579,203 596,207 608,486 621,617 630,503 640,200 649,057 660,136 667,443
Coshocton Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 129,411 148,703 152,180 155,742 159,390 163,128 166,957 170,879 174,897 179,014 183,231
Fairfield Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 99,398 102,794 105,386 108,062 110,825 113,779 116,005 119,052 119,052 119,052 119,052
Licking Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 56,154 94,600 89,600 84,732 79,867 75,004 70,144 70,287 70,433 70,581 70,733
Perry Enforcement/Cleanup/other optional 109,965 121,163 124,285 127,594 166,000 134,504 138,108 141,818 145,634 149,560 153,601
HHW Disposal Assistance - - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000 - 2,000
Special Recycling Collection Events 3,000
County or Township Assistance 70,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Transfer to Vacation/Sick Payout Fund - 10,000
SUBTOTAL OPTIONAL PROGRAMS 467,928 497,260 493,451 496,130 538,082 506,415 513,214 522,036 532,016 538,208 548,617
TOTAL DISTRICT EXPENSES 2,112,291 2,369,320 2,392,505 3,280,298 2,594,412 2,578,903 2,613,112 2,706,512 2,724,829 2,727,848 2,753,043
Balance 5,048,240 4,940,529 4,795,323 3,748,120 3,372,703 2,999,180 2,577,785 2,049,432 1,493,977 926,129 324,448
VACATION/SICK PAYOUT FUND 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Beginning balance and carryover 2,515 2,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515
TRANSFER IN FROM PRIMARY FUND 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EXPENDITURES 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ENDING BALANCE 2,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515 7,515
VIII-15
IX. District Rules [ORC Section 3734.53 (C)]
A. Existing Rules
The CFLP Board of Directors approved District rules on March 12, 1993. The rules were last
amended September 13, 1996. On May 22, 2009 the Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste
Management District Board of Directors adopted a resolution rescinding Rules 1.0 through 6.0 and
renumbering Rule 7.0 to become Rule 1.0. Rule 1.0, regarding public notice of meetings, is included
in Appendix I.
B. Authority to Adopt, Amend, and Rescind Rules
After this updated plan has been approved by the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency, the CFLP Solid Waste Management District Board of Directors may, as the Board deems
appropriate, amend or rescind the existing rule and adopt, amend, or rescind rules to the fullest
extent authorized by Ohio Revised Code Section 343.01(G) and any other provision of Ohio law.
C. Procedures
The District Board of Directors shall use the following procedures for the adoption or amendment of
rules.
1. The Board shall seek the advice and expertise of the Policy Committee and District staff in
the preparation of proposed new or amended rules.
2. Upon completion of proposed new or amended rules, the Board will mail copies of the
proposed rules to each Board of County Commissioners, Policy Committee member, and Health
Department and invite written comments within a stated period of time. The proposed rules
may be mailed to other interested parties.
3. The Board will provide public notice of the availability of the proposed rules for review in the
newspaper of greatest circulation in each county. The notice will include the date by which
written comments on the proposed rules must be received and the dates, times and location of
public hearings on the proposed rules. The public comment period on the proposed rules will
extend at least 30 days from the date of public notice.
4. The Board will provide at least one public hearing on the proposed rules. Additional hearings
may be held if deemed necessary by the Board. District staff will preside at the public hearings.
5. After the hearing/s and public comment, the Board may revise and reissue the proposed
rules, or proceed to take final action on the proposed rules. If the Board reissues revised
proposed rules, the Board will provide another public hearing. The Board may make such
changes in the proposed rules as it deems appropriate in taking final action to adopt or amend
rules.
6. The Board will adopt or amend rules at a regular meeting or a special meeting designed for
rules revision. Rules will be adopted or amended by resolution approved by a majority of the
IX- 1
quorum of the Board.
7. A copy of the adopted or amended rules will be mailed to each Board of Commissioners,
each Policy Committee member, and each Health Department. The rule may be mailed to
interested parties that have been identified during the comment and public hearing period.
The Board may, but is not required, to follow the above procedures when rescinding rules.
IX- 2
CFLP Solid Waste Management District Plan Update 2014
Appendix A
Resolution
of
District Formation
NO CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLANS
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE
COSHOCTON - FAIRFIELD - LICKING - PERRY
JOINT SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
This agreement is made and entered into by and among Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking, and Perry
Counties pursuant to Section 343.01(A), Revised Code, to establish a joint solid waste
management district as required by House Bill 592 (effective June 24, 1988).
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements contained in this
agreement, the Counties agree as follows:
Article 1. Representations and Warranties
1.01. Each of- the Counties hereby represents and warrants to the other Counties that:
(a) It is duly organized and validly existing county and political subdivision of the State
of Ohio;
(b) It has the power to enter into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations
hereunder, and neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement nor performance by
it of any obligations hereunder will violate or constitute a default under any provision of
law or regulation, or any writ, order, or decree of any court or governmental agency, or
any indenture, agreement or other undertaking to which it is a party or by which it is
bound;
(c) It has, by resolution appended to, and made a part of, this agreement, joined in and
ratified this agreement, and it is bound by the terms of this agreement.
Article 2. Establishment of the District
2.01 The Counties hereby establish the District which shall be comprised of all of the
incorporated and unincorporated territory within the Counties.
2.02 The District shall be managed by a Board of Directors consisting of the Commissioners of
the Counties. The Board of Directors shall have all powers, authority and duties conferred upon
it by law, and shall control and manage the District. The Board of Directors may adopt bylaws to
govern its affairs. The Board of Directors shall act by resolution. Seven members of the Board of
Directors constitute a quorum, and a majority vote of all Directors present and voting is required
for the Board to act.
2.03 The Counties retain all rights afforded by law to withdraw from the District, and to receive
upon withdrawal its share of real and personal property and all other District assets apportioned
to the withdrawing County as provided by law. A withdrawing County shall pay to the District a
portion of the District's costs of preparing a revised solid waste management plan necessitated by
the withdrawal. The portion of costs to be paid shall be the same as the proportion that the
population of the withdrawing County bears to the population of District as a whole prior to the
County's withdrawal. Population shall be determined by reference to the most recent decennial
census figures.
1
Article 3. Contributions by Counties
3.01. Operating costs and expenses of the District, including the costs and expenses of the Solid
Waste Management Policy Committee, shall be paid from revenues derived from fees imposed
upon the disposal of solid waste within the District. In the event that additional revenue is needed
to defray costs and expenses, the Board of Directors may require the Counties to provide funds
to the District for that purpose. In that event, the Counties shall provide funds in the same
proportions that the populations of the respective Counties bear to the total population of the
Counties. Population shall be determined by reference to the most recent decennial census
figures. Funds provided pursuant to this paragraph shall not be subject to apportionment to a
County that withdraws from the District, and shall not be reimbursed in whole or in part to the
withdrawing County.
3.02. In the event that the District (including the Policy Committee) requests and authorizes the
use of the services of a County employee, the County employing that person shall receive
compensation for the services by presenting to the district an itemized invoice setting forth the
cost to the County of providing the services of the employee.
3.03. No real or personal property, or rights in such property, are being contributed by the
Counties at the inception of this agreement. In the event that real or personal property or any
rights or interests therein are contributed by a County to the District in the future, the respective
rights of the Counties in that property, or rights or interests therein, including the rights of any
County to division and distribution of that property upon withdrawal of that County from the
District, shall be established by an agreement supplemental to this Agreement approved by the
Board of Commissioners of each County that is a party hereto at such time. The respective rights
of the Counties in any real or personal property, or rights or interests therein, acquired by the
District, including the rights of any County to division and distribution of that property upon
withdrawal of that County from the District, shall be established by the District Board within
thirty days after acquisition of the property.
Article 4. Non-assumption of Liability
4.01. The Boards of County Commissioners by whose action this district is created recognize,
agree, and assert that this District is a government body that is separate and apart from the
governments of the Counties comprising the District, and that liability arising from the conduct
of District affairs shall be solely that of the District to be satisfied from District assets. That
liability shall not accrue to the governments of Counties comprising the District. The Boards of
Commissioners further recognize, agree, and assert that the District does not assume liability
incurred by the governments of Counties comprising the District arising from the conduct of
such governments, including conduct occurring in the generation, transfer, transportation or
disposal of solid or hazardous waste. This paragraph shall not be construed as waiving any rights
or immunities conferred by law upon the District or governments of Counties comprising the
District.
4.02. This agreement shall not be construed as assumption by the District of commitments made
by Counties comprising the District to provide service for the collection, transfer or disposal of
solid waste, or to pay for such services, or to pay any indebtedness of the Counties. In addition,
this agreement shall not be construed as a basis upon which to add the District as a party litigant
2
in any suit arising out of conduct of the government of the Counties instituted before or after the
effective date of this agreement.
4.03. All covenants, stipulations, obligations and agreements of a County contained in this
Agreement are and shall be deemed to be covenants, stipulations, obligations and agreements of
that County to the full extent authorized by law and permitted by the Constitution of the State.
No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement of a County contained in this Agreement shall
be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement of any present or future
member, officer, agent or employee of that County in other than that person's official capacity.
Article 5. Miscellaneous
5.01. All notices, approvals, consents, requests and other communications hereunder shall be in
writing and shall be deemed to have been given when delivered or mailed by first class registered
or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
(a) if to Coshocton, at
Coshocton County Courthouse Annex

349 Main Street
Coshocton, Ohio 43812
Attn: Clerk, Board of County Commissioners
(b) if to Fairfield, at
Fairfield County Courthouse

Lancaster, Ohio 43130
(c) if to Licking, at
Licking County Administration Building

20 South Second Street
Newark, Ohio 43055
-Attn: Clerk, Board of County Commissioners
(d) if to Perry, at
Perry County Administration Building

121 West Brown Street
P.O. BOX 248
New Lexington, Ohio 43764
Each County may, by notice given hereunder to the other Counties, designate further or different
addresses to which subsequent notices, approvals, consents, requests or other communications
shall be sent or persons to whose attention the same shall be directed, but no such
communications shall thereby be required to be sent to more than two addresses.
3
5.02. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon each County and
their respective successors. This Agreement shall not be assigned by any party.
5.03. This document constitutes the entire agreement between the Counties, and no other
documents or verbal statements, made before or after this Agreement takes effect, shall be
deemed to be a part of this Agreement. Amendment of this Agreement may occur only by an
instrument executed in the same manner as this Agreement by the Board of Commissioners of
each County -that is a party to the Agreement.
5.04. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
regarded as an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
5.05. In case any section or provision of this Agreement, or any covenant, stipulation, obligation,
agreement, act, or action, or part thereof made, assumed, entered into, or taken thereunder or any
application, thereof, is for any reason held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity
shall not affect the remainder thereof or any other section or provision thereof or any other
covenant, stipulation, obligation, agreement, act or action or part thereof, made, assumed,
entered into, or taken thereunder (except to the extent that such remainder or section or provision
or other covenant, stipulation, obligation, agreement, act or action or part thereof is wholly
dependent for its operation on the provision determined to be invalid), which shall be construed
and enforced as if such illegal or invalid portion were not contained therein, nor shall such
illegality or invalidity of any application thereof affect any legal and valid application thereof,
and each such section, provision, covenant, stipulation, obligation, agreement, act, or action, or
part thereof shall be deemed to be effective, operative, made, entered into or taken in the manner
and to the full extent permitted by law.
5.06. The terms used in this Agreement shall be construed so as to be consistent with, and to give
effect to, any applicable State or federal laws or regulations issued thereunder, but otherwise so
as to confer the fullest possible authority upon the Counties and the District to accomplish the
purposes of this Agreement.
5.07. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and in no way
define, limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or sections of this Agreement.
5.08. This Agreement shall be deemed to be an agreement made under the laws of the State of
Ohio and for all purposes shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Ohio.
5.09. The Counties agree to refrain from commencing suit to resolve disputes arising in the
management of the district, including disputes regarding interpretation of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the next sentence, all such disputes shall be submitted to the Board of
Directors, which shall render a decision that is final and binding upon the Counties. An
irreconcilable dispute arising between a withdrawing County and the District as to the
apportionment and distribution of real and personal property to the withdrawing County shall be
resolved by binding arbitration. The arbitration process shall be commenced upon request of
either the District or the withdrawing County. Within thirty days of the request for arbitration,
both the District and the withdrawing County shall designate an arbitrator. The two arbitrators,
within fourteen days of their appointment, shall agree upon and select a third arbitrator. Upon
failure of a party to appoint an arbitrator within the time specified, the right to appoint that
4
arbitrator shall pass to the other party. The panel of arbitrators, at their earliest opportunity, shall
take evidence, consider the arguments of the parties, and by majority vote render a decision and
award addressing all issues raised by the parties. The award shall require the party who does not
prevail in the arbitration to pay the fees and expenses of the arbitrators. The decision and award
of the arbitration panel may be enforced or challenged only as provided by Chapter 2711,
Revised Code.
5.10. Each County shall execute this agreement by resolution of its Board of Commissioners
ratifying the agreement. The agreement shall become effective only upon ratification by all four
Counties, and shall take effect on the date of the last such ratification. Ratification resolutions
shall contain no provision purporting to alter, delete or add to the provisions of -this agreement.
A ratification resolution containing such provisions shall be ineffective under this paragraph.
Ratification resolutions shall be appended to, and be part of, this agreement.
5
Appendix B
Copies of Notices
of Public Hearings
and
Public Comment Period
August 11, 2014
Ms. Cheryl Corbin

Delaware-Marion-Morrow-Knox Solid Waste District
117 E. High St., Suite 257
Mt. Vernon, OH 43050
Dear Cheryl,
The Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District Policy Committee has voted to

adopt an amended solid waste management plan that may be reviewed at the public libraries in
Coshocton, Lancaster, Newark and New Lexington or on our website at www.cflpswd.org .
Public comment period begins August 15, 2014 and ends September 15, 2014. A series of public
hearings will follow the comment period according to the following schedule: September 18,
2014 - Newark Public Library ( 2nd floor conference room), 101 W. Main St., Newark;
September 18, 2014 – Fairfield County Public Library, 219 N. Broad St., Lancaster; September
17, 2014 - Coshocton County Public Library, 655 Main St., Coshocton; September 16, 2014 -
Perry County District Library (Genealogy Room), 117 S. Jackson St., New Lexington. All
hearings begin at 5:30 p.m.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding the plan, please do not hesitate to call our office
at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Roger Bail

Athens-Hocking Solid Waste District
P.O. Box 2607
Athens, OH 45701
Dear Roger,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Ty Marsh
Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio
4149 London Groveport Rd.
Grove City, OH 43123
Dear Ty,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Gary Merkamp

Ross-Pickaway-Highland-Fayette Solid Waste District
15 N. Paint Street
Chillicothe, OH 45601
Dear Gary,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Brian Summers

Holmes County Solid Waste District
2 Court St., Suite 22
Millersburg, OH 44654
Dear Brian,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Robert Reiter

SouthEastern Ohio Solid Waste District
515 Main Street
Caldwell, OH 43724
Dear Rob,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. David Held

Stark-Tuscarawas-Wayne Solid Waste District
9918 Wilkshire Blvd.
Bolivar, OH 44612
Dear Dave,

at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Mr. Angel Arroyo-Rodriguez

Ohio EPA, DSIWM
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Dear Angel,
at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
August 11, 2014
Dear Industry Representative,

The Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District is updating its Solid Waste
Management Plan to meet state recycling and reduction mandates. The proposed plan continues
to emphasize residential recycling through drop-off sites and education programs aimed at
increasing recycling participation, and allows for additional services when funds are available.
To fund the ongoing district programs, the disposal fees will change from the current level of
$1.25 for in-district waste, $3.50 out-of-district waste, and $1.25 for out-of-state waste to a new
level of $2.00-$4.00-$2.00, beginning January 1, 2016. The generation fee will decrease from
$2.00 per ton to $1.25 per ton. Therefore, residents and businesses in the District will not see an
increase in solid waste district fees.
The updated plan retains the right of the Board of Directors to designate facilities for the disposal
of solid waste, but does not include designation at this time. These proposed changes are the
result of an in-depth review of budgetary needs for district programs and a thorough review of
the solid waste management plan conducted by the Policy Committee to ensure successful
implementation of the waste reduction and recycling goals of this District.
at 740-349-6308.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
Executive Director
PUBLIC NOTICE
The Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District is updating its Solid Waste
Management Plan to meet state recycling and reduction mandates. The proposed plan continues
to emphasize residential recycling through drop-off sites and education programs aimed at
increasing recycling participation, and allows for additional services when funds are available.
To fund the ongoing district programs, the disposal fees will change from the current level of
$1.25 for in-district waste, $3.50 out-of-district waste, and $1.25 for out-of-state waste to a new
level of $2.00-$4.00-$2.00, beginning January 1, 2016. The generation fee will decrease from
the current level of $2.00 per ton to $1.25 per ton. Therefore, residents and businesses within the
District will not see an increase in solid waste district fees. The updated plan retains the right of
the Board of Directors to designate facilities for the disposal of solid waste, but does not include
designation at this time. These proposed changes are the result of an in-depth review of
budgetary needs for district programs and a thorough review of the solid waste management plan,
conducted by the Policy Committee to ensure successful implementation of the waste reduction
and recycling goals of this District.
Copies of the proposed plan update are available for review at the District Office, 675 Price
Road, Newark, Ohio, 43055, and at public libraries in New Lexington, Newark, Lancaster and
Coshocton. Public comment period begins August 15, 2014 and ends September 15, 2014. A
series of public hearings will follow the comment period according to the following schedule:
September 18, 2014 - Newark Public Library ( 2nd floor study room), 101 W. Main St., Newark;
Perry County District Library, 117 S. Jackson St., New Lexington. All hearings begin at 5:30
p.m.
Questions should be directed to the District Office at 800-845-5361, or 740-349-6308.

Appendix C
Copy of Resolutions
and
Certification Statements
Documenting Ratification
Appendix D
Identification of Consultants
Retained for Plan
Preparation
This plan update was created without the use of
consultants.
Appendix E
District Maps
To save reproduction costs,

small maps are provided here. The electronic version of the plan
allows maps to be printed in any size the reader desires.
L landfill
curbside contract COSHOCTON COUNTY
CL captive landfill Unincorporated Places Township Roads
R recycling center Airports Township Sub Division Streets
county drop-off Mile Markers 2 mile Proposed Township Roads
O open dump Interstate Routes Township Roads (Right of Way only)
Proposed Interstate Routes Municipal Streets
U S Routes Railroads
Proposed U S Routes County Boundary
State Routes City Boundary
Proposed State Routes Township Boundary
County Roads 1
r
s 206
County Sub Division Streets 2
r
s
651
r
s Proposed County Roads 3
T--441
60
9
O
County Roads (Right of Way only) 4
r
s 83
T-
13
62
r
s
643
r
s 0 1 2 3 4 5
7
33 93
T-
T- 3
3 57
32
T-
8
Miles
1
C- 3
Revised: June - 2012

r
s
206
r
s 60
O --11 2
T
33
r
s715
r
s 83
r
s751
196
T- 19
T- 123
232
r
s715
r
s
T--3 42
643
- 199
T
T-19
r
s
T- 4 1
47
1247
r
s
206
T-1245
T--12
T-124
60
r
s
T
/
036 /
0 36
93
r
s
229 /
036
r
s
206 r
s
79
r
s
2
T-11
751
T-
17
7
r
s60 r
s
621
r
s83
T-
12
43
/
0
36
/
0 36
/
0 36
r
s
541
R /
036
r
s
65
T- 60
T-3
60
93
r
s 79 r
s
751
r
s
T
T--551
551
541
r
s
O
55
T-355 541
r
s
541
r
s
541
r
s
60
r
s16
O
T - 415
O L r
s 541 r
s93
r
s79
r
s
83
CL
r
s
60
r
s 541
r
s 16
r
s93
r
s
83
,
.
-
70
s
r
s
r
310
204
s
r
204
FAIRFIELD COUNTY
s
r
360
s
r
256
Unincorporated Places Township Roads
Mile Markers 2 mile Township Sub Division Streets
Airports Township Roads (Right of Way only)
s
r
204 Interstate Routes Proposed Township Roads
s
r
204
s
r
204
s
r
158 s
r
37
s
r
256
- 232
T-2 Proposed State Routes Township Boundary
Ramps 1
County Roads 2
s
r
256
X Proposed County Roads
County Roads (Right of Way only)

4
0
/
33 s
r
188
s
r
256
s
r
256
0 1 2 3 4 5
Miles
s
r
158 Revised: June - 2012
s
r
664
s
r 37
0
/
L
33
landfill
s
r
188
R recycling center
0
/
T
22
transfer facility
s
r 158
CI 0
/
22
CI captive incinerator
s
r
37
0
/33
s
r
188
s
r664
R s
r 37 s
r
37 X compost facility
s
r
188
0
/
X T
22
s
r
O
188
open dump
s
r
188 0
/
22
county drop-off
0
/ 33 s
r
664
s
r
312
nonsubscription
0
/ curbside
O
22
X 0
/ 33
0
/ s
r
subscription
159
22
O curbside
XL
5
10
T-
s
r
159
T--3301
01
subscription curbside R recycling center X compost facility LICKING COUNTY
nonsubscription curbside CL captive landfill T transfer facility Unincorporated Places Ramps Municipal Streets
O open dump Mile Markers 2 mile County Roads Railroads

county drop-off CI captive incinerator Airports County Sub Division Streets County Boundary
0 1 2 3 4 5
Interstate Routes Proposed County Roads City Boundary
Miles Proposed Interstate Routes County Roads (Right of Way only) Township Boundary
r
s
657 Revised: June - 2012
U S Routes Township Roads 1
Proposed U S Routes Township Sub Division Streets 2
State Routes Township Roads (Right of Way only) 3

T-69
Proposed State Routes Proposed Township Roads 4
R r
s
661
r
s
13
r
s
586
r
s
657 /
0
62
17
2
T-
21
21
T-2
T-722
T-7
/
0 62
X O C-201
C-201 r
s
586 r
s 79
12
T-2
r
s13
r
s
79
/
0
T-22
T- 228
62
r
s
657
r
s
37
r
s 661
-17
C-1
/
0
62
r
s
79
r
s
13
r
s
586
r
s
657
/
0 62
r
s
310
r
s
37
X r
s
661
X r
s
79
X R r
s
CL
16
X
C-6 1 2
r
s
161
r
s
161 r
s13
r
s146
r
s37
r
s
16
r
s
T
16
r
s16
79
T- 2
r
s
16 X CI
r
s
310
r
s 79
r
s
37
r
s
-28 9
T-28
13
T
T-314
-3 14
T-288
r
s16
T-1
r
s
02
16
9
r
s
310
/
040
T-315
/
0
40 /
040
/
0
40
r
s
79 /
0
40
-
.
,
70
/
0 40
-
.
, 70 r
s
158
r
s r
s /
0
40
37
-
,
.70
13
-
,
.
70
-
.
,70 -
,
. 70
r
s 79
r
s
668
r
s
204
r
s
13
r
s L
T-529
668
r
s
204
T-429
T-60
r
s
188
r
s204
r
s
204
T -356
T-39 8
56
r
s
757
1
/
0 22
T- 7
r
s
T-91
13
r
s668
T-4
r
s
14
13
/
0
58
22
T-
T-11
r
s
5
345
T-41 0
-44 0
T-44
T-50
r
s
13
r
s
669
r
s383
r
s 93
T-3
T-31
r
s
T--38
669
/
0
T
22
T-15 3
T-1
T-153
53
T-174
74
T-140 r
s
668
T-
T-418
17
0
T-138
r
s345
r
s 669
r
s 13
X
T- T-451
T-451
L
41
9 9
20
T-
r
s
37
r
s 37
R r
s 93
T-220 3
T-33 2
T-
T
T-1
T-332
-1 7 5
T-83
r
s
13 r
s
555
r
s93
r
s
T-2
37
-2 17
T-32
r
s
0
668
O
T-362
T-3
-318
r
s
18
13
T-213
T-2
O
T-240
-2 3 8
T-23
T
T- 2
3 7
T-221
T -221
T-
13
4
r
s
13
r
s
T-228
T-228
93
r
s
T- 2 14
14
312
233
T-23
s
r
-2 5511
T -2
668
T
T--24
2
r
s
23 3
r
s
T--23
155 155
T
25
T-
T-25
PERRY COUNTY
2 57
r
s
93
9
26
T-
Unincorporated Places Township Roads
Airports Township Sub Division Streets r

s
216
r
s13
3
r
s
T-262
28
T--2 9 0
T-
595 T
O
Mile Markers 2 mile Township Roads (Right of Way only)
-266 6
T-2
Interstate Routes Proposed Township Roads

T

county drop-off
Proposed State Routes Township Boundary
Ramps 1
L landfill
County Roads 2

R recycling center
Proposed County Roads 4 O open dump
County Roads (Right of Way only)
0 1 2 3 4 5
Miles
Revised: June - 2012
Appendix F
Information Related to
Collection and
Compiling of Recycling Data
Residential/Commercial Waste/Recycling Surveys: Haulers, Recyclers,

Local Governments for 2012
Digest of Residential/Commercial Recycling Data

from 2012 Surveys (referred to on page IV-3 and V-20)
List of Abitibi Retriever Paper Bins

(referred to in Table III-5)
Industrial Waste/Recycling Survey for 2012
Digest of Industrial Recycling Data

from 2012 Surveys (referred to on page IV-3)
January 3, 2013
Happy New Year! We hope 2013 will be a good year for our local economy and for all our
partners in solid waste management. Your business plays a key role in our ability to meet state
mandates and provide a high level of service in our four counties. We want you to know (just in
case we don’t tell you often enough) that we value this partnership and your efforts to contribute
to the reduction of waste going to landfills.
To show Ohio EPA that we are still striving toward the 66% industrial recycling goal, we need
your help for the 2012 Annual Report. We can only count recycling which is actually reported to
us, and no estimating is done for companies that do not respond. No matter how much or how
little your company recycles, it adds up when combined with more than 500 other companies.
Every little bit helps. Please respond!
In 2013, the state will continue to review the legislation that created solid waste districts and seek
changes. To ensure that we are prepared for those discussions, we have included a few questions
regarding the impact of our district on your business. Your candid and thoughtful responses will
be much appreciated and ensure that we are representing the interests of all our partners. We’ve
included a self addressed stamped envelope for mailing it back. Please correct any inaccuracies
in our mailing information, including the contact person and their phone number.
Please feel free to call our office if you need help with the form or if you have any questions.
The enclosed conversion chart may help figure out tons versus cubic yards for a variety of
materials. Your response back to us by March 1, 2013 will help us submit an accurate annual
report to Ohio EPA in a timely manner.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
District Coordinator
enclosures
January 3, 2013
Dear Solid Waste Hauler,
Happy New Year! As the new year begins, we want to thank you for being our partner in
reducing the waste that ends up in landfills by increasing recycling wherever possible. We hope
that signs of an improved economy continue to strengthen as the year moves forward, and we
hope that your business continues to grow as well.
Your input is vital in demonstrating to the state that we are annually increasing our recycling.
Responding is easy with the simple "fill in the blank" form and self addressed stamped envelope
for mailing it back. The mailing label at the top of the form indicates how your information
appears in our database. If any of the information is incorrect, please write in the changes below
the label.
be much appreciated and ensure that we are representing the interests of all our partners.
The enclosed conversion charts will help figure out tons versus cubic yards for a variety of
materials. Your response back to us by March 1, 2013 will help us complete our annual report
to Ohio EPA.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
enclosures
January 3, 2013
Dear Recycler,
Happy New Year! Initial reports from county recycling programs indicate steady volumes in
recycling in 2012, and we hope that you saw that as well. Your business plays a key role in our
ability to meet state mandates and provide a high level of service to residents and businesses in
our four counties. We want you to know (just in case we don’t tell you often enough) that we
value this partnership and your efforts to contribute to the reduction of waste going to landfills.
As we do each year, we are asking for your help in demonstrating to the state that we are
annually increasing our recycling. As always, we made responding easy by keeping the form
simple with "fill in the blank" and by sending a self addressed stamped envelope for mailing it
back. The mailing label at the top of the form indicates how your information appears in our
database. If any of the information is incorrect, please write in the changes below the label.
be much appreciated and ensure that we are representing the interests of all our partners.
The OEPA has asked us to specifically mention that we are not allowed to count recycling of
auto bodies or engines, train cars, or liquid waste, so please do not include those weights in your
recycling totals.
The enclosed conversion charts will help figure out tons versus cubic yards for a variety of
materials. Your response back to us by March 1, 2013 will help us complete our annual report
to Ohio EPA.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
enclosures
January 3, 2013
Dear Local Government Official,
Happy New Year! We hope 2013 will be a good year for our local economy and for all our
partners in solid waste management. Both townships and municipalities play a key role in our
ability to meet state mandates and provide a high level of service to residents and businesses in
our four counties. We want you to know (just in case we don’t tell you often enough) that we
value this partnership and your efforts to contribute to the reduction of waste going to landfills.
Because we exist to increase recycling and decrease reliance on landfills, we must demonstrate to
the OEPA that we are continuing to do both each year. For that, we need your help in
documenting the tons that were collected for recycling in 2012. We can only count recycling
which is actually reported to us, and no estimating is done for those who do not respond. To
make sure we don't overlook even one recycling program, please respond!
regarding the services you receive and the value of those services to your residents. Your candid
and thoughtful responses will be much appreciated, and can also help guide us to focusing on the
services most valued.
We made responding as easy as we can by keeping the form simple with "fill in the blank" and by
sending a self addressed stamped envelope for your reply. The mailing label at the top of the
survey form indicates how your information appears in our database. If any of the information is
incorrect, please write in the changes.
Please feel free to call our office if you need help with the form, or have any questions. Your
response back to us by March 1, 2013 will help us complete our annual report to Ohio EPA.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
enclosures
May 1, 2013
The 2012 Annual Recycling Report is almost complete, but we are missing your important
information. We know there is more recycling happening than what has been documented so far,
and we need your help to show that. Only by returning your completed survey can your recycling
efforts be recognized. If you’re not recycling, tell us how we can help!
We can only count recycling which is actually reported to us, and no estimating is done for
companies that do not respond. Even if your company does not recycle much waste material, it
adds up when combined with more than 600 other companies. Every little bit helps. Please
respond!
Please feel free to call our office if you need help with the form or if you have any questions. We
are still hopeful that you will return this in time for us to include it in our annual report to the
state, however, we must submit the annual report before the beginning of June, so time is
growing short.
Sincerely,
Carol A. Philipps
attachment
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
RECYCLERS
Our Contact Information: Contact Person: _____________________________

Phone Number: _____________________________
Tonnages collected, processed, and passed forward for recycling that came from Coshocton,
Fairfield, Licking or Perry Counties. If you are recycling materials from other counties, those
counties should be including it on their annual reports, but we cannot include it on ours.
MATERIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL WHERE DID YOU

AND RECYCLING SEND THIS
COMMERCIAL MATERIAL?
RECYCLING
TONS TONS
Appliances
Batteries
Glass
Metals-ferrous
Metals-nonferrous
Corrugated cardboard
Newsprint
Office Paper/Mixed Paper
Plastics
Textiles
Yard Waste
Used motor oil
Wood
Electronics scrap
Other (please specify)
TOTALS:
(Continued on back)
1. Recycling Center Hours of Operation Open to the Public:
2. Materials accepted:
_____ clear glass _____ brown glass _____ green glass

_____ newspaper _____ office paper _____ magazines
_____ corrugated cardboard _____ paperboard _____ other fiber
_____ #1 plastic _____ #2 plastic _____ other plastic
_____ aluminum cans _____ scrap aluminum _____ scrap ferrous
_____ steel/tin cans _____ wood _____ electronics
_____ appliances _____ lead acid batteries _____ household batteries
_____ motor oil _____ antifreeze _____ textiles
_____ other (please list) ______________________________________________________
3. Do you provide pickup service, and if so, how far away are you able to service?
4. What additional materials would you collect if you had a reasonable market for them?
5. Please rank the services provided by the district (#1 being most important, #12 being least
important) using each number only once.
_____ Dropoff recycling _____ Curbside Recycling
_____ School/office recycling _____ Education about recycling
_____ Litter collection along roadways _____ Tire/Appliance Drives
_____ Market development for recyclables _____ Composting
_____ Health Dept. Enforcement _____ Private property dump cleanup
_____ Litter Law enforcement (sheriff deputies) _____ Hazardous waste collection
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
SOLID WASTE HAULERS
1. Current Contact Information: Contact Person: ___________________________
Phone Number: ___________________________
E-mail address: ___________________________
2. Tonnages collected, processed, and passed forward for recycling. Please list only the tons that came
from Coshocton, Fairfield, Licking or Perry Counties. If you are recycling materials from other
counties, those counties should be including it on their annual reports, but we cannot include it on
ours.
MATERIAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL WHERE DID YOU

AND RECYCLING SEND THIS
COMMERCIAL MATERIAL?
RECYCLING
TONS TONS
Appliances
Batteries
Glass
Metals-ferrous
Metals-nonferrous
Newsprint
Office Paper/Mixed Paper
Plastics
Textiles
Yard Waste
Used motor oil
Wood
Electronics scrap
Other (please specify)
TOTALS:
3. What is the approximate number of homes you provide recycling service to? _________
(continued on the back)

4. Do your customers pay extra for that recycling service? ___ Yes ___ No
5. Names of Townships or Municipalities where your customers pay extra for recycling:
Name of Townships or Municipalities where you have a contract for recycling and the cost is built
into the contract (residents don’t have to pay extra):
(The answers to questions #3, 4, and 5 determine how much recycling credit we can claim for the recycling
services your company provides. The state has a formula that calculates credit based on the number of
people receiving service and whether or not they have to pay extra for it.)
6. If you do not offer recycling services, what would give you the incentive to begin?
7. Do the disposal fees and generation fees collected for solid waste districts influence which landfill
you use to dispose of collected waste? If yes, how?
8. Have you seen a difference in the material you collect from residences since the district has been
providing annual collection events for household hazardous waste? If yes, in what way?
9. Please rank the services provided by the district (#1 being most important, #12 being least important)
using each number only once.
2012 ANNUAL REPORT
MUNICIPALITIES AND TOWNSHIPS
1. Current Contact Information: Contact Person: ____________________________
Phone Number: ___________________________
Email Address: ____________________________
2. Type of recycling services used by your residents (please check all that apply):
___ curbside offered by you ___ curbside offered by haulers *

___ drop-off bin within your jurisdiction ___ drop-off bin in another jurisdiction
___ recycling center ___ collection drives
*please list which haulers provide the services:
3. Please rank the services provided by the district (#1 being most important, #12 being least important)
using each number only once.
(continue onto back only if you directly provide the recycling services to your residents)
4. If you provide recycling service, please convert pounds to tons (there are 2000 pounds per ton)
collected for recycling:
2012 TONS COLLECTED
MATERIAL TONS
Aluminum cans
Nonferrous scrap
Glass
Newsprint
Office Paper
Plastics
Steel/bimetal cans
Ferrous scrap
Other (please list)
TOTALS:
5. Where were the materials taken for recycling? (We need to know this so we don't count materials twice, since
recyclers will be reporting as well.)
Industrial Waste Annual Survey - 2012
Solid Waste District : Coshocton/Fairfield/Licking/Perry
Company Profile – Please help us keep our records accurate and our mail going to the people who should be
receiving it. You receive these surveys because the Harris Database lists your company as a manufacturer of a
product and we are required to survey manufacturers each year for recycling data. Our contact should be the person
in your company responsible for waste disposal and recycling.
Company Name we should use for mailing_________________________________________________

Number of employees ___________ (approximate is fine)
Contact Person: ________________________________ Title: ______________________________
Phone Number: ________________________________
E-mail Address: _____________________________ Prefer e-mail correspondence to hard copy? ___Yes ___ No
List the amount of each material recycled and the facility the recycled material was sent to:
MATERIAL TYPE AMOUNT FACILITY RECYCLED MATERIAL
RECYCLED SENT TO
TONS
Batteries
Food
Glass
Cardboard
Paper (include newspaper)
Plastic – all types
Ferrous Metal
Non-ferrous Metal
Nonexempt foundry sand and slag
Rubber (no tires)
Tires
Textiles
Wood
Yard Waste
Non-hazardous Chemicals
Other:
Other:
Total
(continued on back)
List the amount of each material disposed and the landfill the material was sent to:
MATERIAL TYPE AMOUNT DISPOSED LANDFILL THAT RECEIVED
TONS WASTE
Do the disposal and generation fees collected for solid waste districts influence your decision about where to
send your waste? If yes, how?
Did you have a waste reduction program in 2012? _____ Yes _____ No
(If yes, please describe below)
Please rank the services provided by the district (#1 being most important, #12 being least important) using each
number only once.
Appendix F INDUSTRIAL SURVEY RESPONSES-2012
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Household Ferrous NonFerrous Foundry All other Passenger Truck Other Yard
SIC GEN DISPOSED RECYCLED Appliances Batteries Food Glass Metals Metals Sand OCC paper Plastics Tires Tires Tires Textiles Wood Waste Organics FGD Misc.
0252 11,344.0000 11,344.0000 11344
2011 - -
2011 27.5000 27.5000 0.5 1 26
2013 2,390.0000 2,390.0000 878 26 709 1 220 556
2013 - -
2013 - -
2022 7.6000 7.6000 1 6.6
2024 - -
2024 187.5000 187.5000 40 2 125 0.5 20
2024 - -
2026 14,985.3600 279.89 14,705.4700 14300 173.55 1.34 214.15 1 15.43
2037 - -
2043 17,031.0000 180 16,851.0000 15918 99 395 117 75 247
2048 - -
2048 - -
2048 - -
2048 6.5000 6.5000 1 0.5 5
2051 - -
2064 - -
2084 - -
2084 - -
2084 3.0000 3 -
2084 - -
2084 - -
2087
2097 1.0000 1.0000 1
2221 - -
2273 0.0750 0.0750 0.075
2295 84.5000 80 4.5000 4 0.5
2295 81.7500 80 1.7500 1.75
2297 4.4000 4.4000 1.7 2.7
2329 - -
2381 252.1000 220.6 31.5000 2.2 1.4 19.9 1.5 6.5
2381 - -
2391 - -
2392 3.0000 3 -
2392 - -
2394 - -
2394 - -
2394 - -
2395 - -
2395 - -
2395 6.0000 6.0000 2 2 1 1
2395 - -
2396 - -
2396 - -
2396 - -
2396 - -
2396 1.5000 1.5 -
2399 173.0000 10 163.0000 72 79 12
2399 - -
2411 - -
2421 1,100.0000 1,100.0000 1100
2421 31.0000 30 1.0000 1
2431 - -
2431 23.6600 23.6600 23.66
2431 240.0000 240.0000 140 100
2431 - -
2431 - -
2431 10.0000 10.0000 10
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2434 - -
2435 32,173.0300 72 32,101.0300 75 0.005 0.005 26 0.02 32000
2439 1.5000 1.5000 1 0.5
2439 - -
2448 2,500.0000 2,500.0000 2500
2448 25.0000 25.0000 25
2448 - -
2448 104.0000 104 -
2449 - -
2449 - -
2449 144.7500 144.75 -
2499 - -
2511
2521 - -
2542 6.0000 6.0000 6
2542 - -
2591 - -
2631 2,038.2000 2,038.2000 25 2 1 1 5 2004.2
2631 79,721.4600 11590 68,131.4600 0.46 240 67 67824
2653 5,907.1000 5,907.1000 0.1 20 5887
2653 39.4290 39.4290 39.429
2653 3,180.0000 90 3,090.0000 5 2 3081 2
2653 69.9725 69.9725 69.9725
2653 144.0000 144.0000 144
2655 88.3900 48.03 40.3600 8.57 3.18 4.04 24.57
2671 179.0000 5 174.0000 10 130 34
2679 - -
2711 - -
2711 11.1800 11.1800 11.18
2711 - -
2711 - -
2711 1.0000 1.0000 1
2711 932.3000 932.3000 34.9 30 867.4
2711 - -
2711 - -
2711 - -
2711 - -
2711 4.0000 4.0000 4
2721 818.4445 818.4445 14.2011 799.56 4.68335
2721 - -
2721 1.5000 1.5000 1.5
2721 0.5000 0.5000 0.5
2731 0.5000 0.5000 0.2 0.3
2741 4.0000 2 2.0000 2
2741 - -
2741 - -
2752 43.2100 2 41.2100 40.21 1
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 165.1890 165.1890 0.7775 164.274 0.1375
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 6.0000 6 -
2752 59.4100 3.12 56.2900 1.8675 48.1225 6.3
2752 117.0000 117.0000 22 95
2752 113.8050 20 93.8050 0.5 0.125 92.8 0.38
2752 0.5000 0.5000 0.5
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2752 - -
2759 - -
2759 - -
2759 3,894.8000 6.1 3,888.7000 41.8 8.5 48.3 3786.9 3.2
2759 - -
2759 2.0000 2 -
2759 40.0000 20 20.0000 20
2759 129.5550 129.5550 16.3 1.5 84.96 26.795
2759 5,282.0300 5,282.0300 65.98 5210.27 3 2.78
2759 3.0000 3.0000 1 2
2782 - -
2791 - -
2791 6.4600 6.4600 6.46
2791 - -
2796 0.0100 0.0100 0.01
2813 - -
2813 - -
2819 5.4800 2.76 2.7200 2.72
2841 - -
2844 - -
2844 - -
2869 216.0000 216.0000 60 156
2869 7.0000 5 2.0000 1 1
2869 - -
2869 - -
2893 227.8950 227.8950 3.375 216 5.52 3
2899 - -
2899 - -
2899 - -
2899 35,174.0000 35,174.0000 31410 3764
2899 - -
2951 - -
2951 - -
2951 - -
2951 14.3600 14.3600 9.19 0.09 0.5 4.58
2951 15.5880 15.5880 15.588
2952 - -
2952 172.6400 172.6400 21.38 36.14 3.72 14.79 96.61
3011 55.8500 55.8500 1 28.13 2.02 10.6 5 9.1
3081 2,408.5000 165 2,243.5000 11.5 108 4 2048 72
3081 - -
3085 197.0000 72 125.0000 5 10 60 50
3086 200.0000 200.0000 200
3086 153.0000 25 128.0000 20 1 100 1 6
3087 3,003.0000 632.9 2,370.1000 125.7 5.1 61 1650.3 142 246.5 139.5
3089 - -
3089 - -
3089 2,711.5000 2,711.5000 2540 42 0.5 9 120
3089 - -
3089 - -
3089 112.5900 112.5900 0.06 31.83 6.5 74.2
3089 - -
3089 - -
3089 - -
3089 45.0000 30 15.0000 5 10
3089 15.0000 15.0000 15
3089 25.0000 25.0000 25
3089 10,150.0000 10,150.0000 150 10000
3089 75.4800 37.6 37.8800 0.05 3.35 0.38 6.21 1.5 12.93 5.64 7.82
3089 2.0000 2.0000 2
3142 - -
3199 2.0000 2.0000 1 1
3211 1,545.0270 1,545.0270 1534 1.027 10
3229 63,481.0100 9054 54,427.0100 53358.36 24.25 42.5 1001.8 0.1
3229 - -
3229 32.0000 32.0000 32
3229 3,475.9800 3300.48 175.5000 3 7 10.5 155
3231
3231 75.5000 75.5000 70 2 3.5
3251 1,061.7900 26 1,035.7900 18.66 0.75 9 2.2 4.82 0.36 1000
3251 1,108.3200 1,108.3200 13.32 1095
3255 467.5000 218.5 249.0000 249
3261 - -
3269 24.0000 24.0000 24
3269 - -
3269 - -
3269 - -
3271 81.1420 9.47 71.6720 12.32 2.42 1.35 55.582
3272 - -
3272 - -
3272 - -
3272 2.0000 2 -
3273 - -
3273
3273 10.0000 10 -
3273 - -
3273 - -
3281
3281 - -
3281 - -
3281 - -
3296 18,362.0000 15343 3,019.0000 2683 330 3 3
3296 12.0000 12.0000 12
3312 39,737.7170 11300.69 28,437.0270 0.195 383.34 24272.752 2923.8 1.79 63.21 791.94
3312 - -
3317 1,075.4200 1,075.4200 934 9 5.4 25.02 8 94
3321 38,397.1200 21717.67 16,679.4500 9713.7 0.06 6934.08 19.5 4.45 0.45 7.21
3321 1,200.0000 1200 -
3334 4,991.0000 2965 2,026.0000 1896 130
3351 - -
3369 - -
3411 - -
3423 - -
3423 - -
3424 5.2500 5.25 -
3429 - -
3441 0.1000 0.1000 0.1
3441
3441 - -
3441 - -
3441 1.0000 1.0000 1
3441 10.5050 10.5050 0.005 10.5
3441 3.0000 3 -
3441 165.7775 165.7775 104.42 13.98 0.1275 47.25
3443 90.0000 90.0000 90
3443 7.9250 7.9250 0.47 2.695 4.76
3443 6.9254 6.9254 0.47 3.5525 2.9029
3444 - -
3444 - -
3444 88.0000 88.0000 2 86
3444 - -
3444 31.0000 22 9.0000 7 1 1
3444 - -
3444 80.0000 8 72.0000 72
3446 - -
3446
3446 6.0000 6.0000 5 1
3446 - -
3451 29.0000 29.0000 20 9
3451 55.0000 55.0000 50 5
3451 - -
3452 - -
3462 1,450.7500 15 1,435.7500 1416 1 0.75 18
3469 95.7000 95.7000 91.2 4.5
3469 150.0000 150.0000 125 25
3469 126.0000 9 117.0000 73 40 3 1
3469 0.4650 0.4650 0.465
3469 3,500.1500 7 3,493.1500 3420.15 36 1 36
3469 7,489.0000 7,489.0000 7066 423
3471 4,408.4000 2475 1,933.4000 40 983 192 6 10 702.4
3471 7.0000 5 2.0000 1.5 0.5
3471 - -
3479 - -
3496 - -
3496 - -
3496 25.3800 12.24 13.1400 0.04 2.5 0.9 2.5 0.9 2.9 0.5 2.9
3496 - -
3496 - -
3496 150.4000 62.4 88.0000 63 25
3496 85.7000 19.7 66.0000 55 0.5 4.7 5.8
3499 - -
3499 - -
3499 - -
3523 - -
3532 23.0000 23.0000 20 1 2
3532 - -
3541 - -
3543 - -
3544 16.5000 5.5 11.0000 9 2
3544 - -
3544 1.7500 1.7500 0.25 0.25 1.25
3544 - -
3544 - -
3544 - -
3545 - -
3546 3.2500 3.2500 1.25 0.25 1.75
3548 - -
3549 - -
3549 4.5000 4.5000 1.5 1 2
3549 - -
3559 - -
3559 4.0000 4.0000 3 0.5 0.5
3559 - -
3561 - -
3564 329.2000 136.8 192.4000 60.1 6.3 22.9 59.7 9.6 33.8
3565 4.6205 4.6205 0.0225 0.5 0.563 3 0.25 0.0375 0.16 0.0875
3566 88.6000 88.6000 88.6
3566 5.0000 5.0000 5
3567 317.9000 60 257.9000 220 8 16 1.5 12 0.4
3569 - -
3577 1.7500 0.1 1.6500 1.1 0.5 0.05
3589 - -
3589 - -
3593 - -
3599 - -
3599 - -
3599 - -
3599 0.2500 0.2500 0.15 0.1
3599 - -
3599 - -
3599 75.0000 75.0000 75
3599
3599 7.1000 1 6.1000 5 0.5 0.5 0.1
3599 - -
3599 - -
3599 6.0000 6.0000 6
3599 - -
3599 0.0325 0.0325 0.015 0.0175
3599 - -
3599 7.7000 7.7000 7.7
3599 - -
3599 5.0000 2.5 2.5000 2 0.5
3599 1.0000 1.0000 1
3599 - -
3599 1.5000 1.5000 1.5
3599 - -
3599 1.2500 1.2500 1 0.25
3599 - -
3599 - -
3599 2.1000 2.1000 2.1
3599 - -
3629 339.9700 339.9700 337.87 2.1
3633 - -
3639 - -
3644 - -
3645 - -
3646 222.0000 118 104.0000 25 27 50 2
3646 517.0750 109.74 407.3350 149.36 110.135 147.84
3648
3661 - -
3675 - -
3678 - -
3679 - -
3679 350.0000 350.0000 350
3679 - -
3679 - -
3691 - -
3699 - -
3711 - -
3714 956.8900 956.8900 914 42.89
3714 1,990.1500 198.95 1,791.2000 1479.47 31.52 258.7 21.51
3714 720.4400 7 713.4400 713.23 0.21
3714 - -
3714 - -
3715 68.0000 50 18.0000 10 2 6
3751 - -
3751 0.2150 0.2150 0.215
3751 - -
3751 - -
3751 - -
3761 27.6400 27.6400 16.74 7.5 2.7 0.7
3812 - -
3822 - -
3823 409.3700 409.3700 409.37
3823 - -
3823 615.6100 236.15 379.4600 216.31 16 40.95 46.2 60
3823 4.5100 4.5100 2.22 2.29
3824 - -
3826 - -
3829 - -
3829 - -
3842 - -
3843 - -
3843 - -
3911 - -
3914 - -
3931
3949 20.0000 20.0000 20
3949 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 7.3925 7.3925 0.7875 5 0.155 1 0.45
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 0.0500 0.0500 0.05
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 - -
3993 0.0250 0.0250 0.025
3993 0.0500 0.0500 0.05
3993 - -
3999 - -
3999 0.0750 0.0750 0.025 0.05
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
3999 - -
6686 878,769.59 645,974.50 232,795.09 0.89 648.34 52.5 211558 20535.36
TOTALS 1,320,076 728,664 591,412 0 0 31,138 57,999 63,170 32,860 6,934 18,789 9,085 15,007 6 9 1 225 106,358 2 11,345 211,558 26,924
ADDITIONAL REPORTED BY PROCESSORS 46,111.90 1,125.00 - - 0.33 887.79 386.12 - 3,848.98 5,377.69 7,317.24 - - - 1,306.50 25,000.00 - - - 862.26
TOTAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE RECYCLED 637,523.57 1,125.00 0.32 31,137.50 57,999.48 64,057.76 33,246.48 6,934.08 22,638.37 14,462.84 22,324.42 6.35 9.38 1.00 1,531.15 131,357.74 2.00 11,345.00 211,558.00 27,786.69
nonferrous
CURBSIDE PROGRAMS aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Coshocton Co. Coshocton City 225.01 225.01
Private hauler subcription 94.75 94.75
Fairfield Co. Berne Twp 3.3 25.52 18.26 60.95 16.20 3.57 127.78
Madison Twp 0.2 0.77 0.71 2.23 0.80 0.18 4.83
Lithopolis 55.60 55.60
Private Hauler Subscription 4.0 44.90 16.01 96.43 30.20 17.15 6.98 215.70
Licking Co. Private Hauler subscription 18.4 204.92 73.10 440.20 137.85 78.31 31.86 984.66
Granville Village 314.60 314.60
Granville Twp 108.39 108.39
Union Twp 57.20 57.20
St. Albans Twp 12.01 12.01
Johnstown 202.77 202.77
Monroe Twp 9.72 9.72
Bowling Green Twp 2.29 2.29
Madison Twp 3.72 3.72
Newark 21.45 21.45
Private Hauler subscription 47.19 47.19
SUBTOTAL CURBSIDE 3.43 22.45 276.11 108.08 536.63 231.23 112.46 3.75 38.84 1,154.70 2,487.67
nonferrous
DISTRICT FUNDED DROPOFF aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Coshocton Co. Adams Twp-Bakersville 0.31 2.59 3.68 0.53 1.07 0.26 8.44
Franklin Twp-Conesville 0.20 4.17 4.27 0.89 1.82 0.45 11.80
Jefferson Twp-Nellie 0.21 3.55 5.78 0.71 1.48 0.49 12.22
Jefferson Twp-Warsaw 0.65 10.84 13.76 2.24 4.52 1.52 33.53
Lafayette Twp-W. Lafayette 0.72 11.07 13.46 2.58 4.65 1.69 34.17
Linton Twp - Plainfield 0.28 4.08 7.62 0.85 1.70 0.65 15.19
Perry Twp-New Guilford 0.18 2.38 4.23 0.50 1.01 0.35 8.64
Pike Twp-West Carlisle 0.14 1.59 2.36 0.32 0.64 0.09 5.14
Tiverton Twp 0.20 2.11 2.34 0.43 0.88 0.35 6.31
Fairfield Co. Amanda Twp 1.22 9.70 20.93 12.18 3.12 1.66 48.80
Berne Twp - Sugar Grove 0.76 7.77 4.64 14.31 4.27 0.83 32.57
Bloom Twp.-Collegeview 0.95 11.64 6.46 16.51 4.65 1.22 41.43
Clearcreek Twp.-Oakland 0.99 11.16 9.54 15.76 4.63 1.50 43.58
Clearcreek Twp.-Stoutsville 1.05 10.98 6.18 16.48 5.16 1.59 41.42
Greenfield Twp 2.15 15.08 8.97 20.74 6.22 2.19 55.34
Hocking Twp. 0.80 9.31 4.85 13.11 3.83 1.12 33.01
Lancaster -Community Action 4.30 40.23 23.72 56.65 14.65 5.66 145.21
Lancaster - Hunter Trace Park 2.34 20.77 30.60 29.21 6.21 3.22 92.34
Lancaster - Sheriff's Lot 2.24 15.81 23.57 19.90 4.83 2.98 69.30
Lancaster - Utica School 1.09 10.64 5.11 18.58 4.84 1.06 41.32
Lancaster - Liberty Center 3.72 33.95 45.59 47.23 14.56 4.83 149.88
Lancaster-Ohio Univ. 1.81 18.30 11.07 28.62 7.68 2.52 70.00
Liberty Twp. 1.34 13.91 8.31 18.45 5.60 1.32 48.93
Pickerington - Center St. 6.69 65.86 113.76 89.30 26.87 8.56 311.04
Pickerington - Hill Rd. 1.34 14.10 13.23 15.81 5.57 1.95 51.99
Pleasant Twp. 3.17 28.93 38.22 44.21 12.61 4.27 131.41
Pleasant Twp -Tikki Lane 3.90 32.94 35.61 48.89 11.21 4.98 137.53
Richland Twp - Rushville 0.68 7.41 4.47 14.24 4.08 0.86 31.73
Violet Twp - OU 5.02 50.49 68.30 70.41 19.69 6.63 220.54
Violet Twp.-Trinity Life 1.12 10.38 5.41 16.30 5.50 1.36 40.07
Violet Twp.-Zeller Park 1.10 9.46 4.29 13.98 4.80 1.17 34.78
Walnut Twp 0.15 1.44 0.71 2.25 0.58 0.14 5.27
Licking Co. Etna Twp-Etna 1.91 33.06 18.04 3.21 56.22
Franklin Twp 1.38 5.32 4.47 2.07 13.24
Granville Twp-Granville 0.90 19.68 3.05 1.35 24.98
Hanover Twp-Hanover 2.04 39.87 32.33 3.49 77.73
Harrison Twp-Outville 5.14 40.10 27.25 7.91 80.40
Hartford Twp-Croton 0.75 15.92 2.74 1.13 20.54
Heath 4.04 113.89 42.91 6.48 167.32
Jersey Twp-Mink Rd 2.04 27.78 18.34 3.06 51.23
Liberty Twp-Northridge Rd 1.15 17.94 10.51 1.64 31.23
McKean Twp-Fredonia 0.90 14.73 3.03 1.35 20.00
Mary Ann Twp 0.51 12.54 6.99 0.86 20.89
Monroe Twp-Johnstown 2.59 25.37 17.48 4.28 49.71
Newark-Granville St. 0.72 21.34 10.81 1.43 34.30
Newark-E Main 1.53 41.94 21.51 2.64 67.62
Newark - Deo 8.20 279.76 134.17 13.82 435.96
Newark-Cherry Valley 3.91 132.11 37.60 6.56 180.18
Newark-Flory Park 3.93 193.59 38.43 6.80 242.75
Newark-Everett Ave 0.72 15.76 2.69 1.08 20.25
Newton Twp-St. Louisville 0.60 11.97 2.00 0.90 15.47
St. Albans Twp-Alex 1.70 23.31 13.68 5.09 43.78
Union Twp-Bear Creek 0.21 1.45 1.03 0.62 0.84 0.39 4.53
nonferrous
Union Twp-Hebron 1.70 43.42 26.74 2.85 74.71
Washington Twp-Utica 2.08 19.46 14.91 3.49 39.94
Cardboard runs only from all locations 42.68 42.68
Perry Co. Bearfield Twp - Six Mile Turn 2.17 8.03 2.90 13.94 2.81 2.11 31.94
Clayton Twp - Saltillo 2.06 6.47 2.35 8.52 0.40 2.22 1.49 23.51
Coal Twp - New Straitsville 1.94 6.43 2.32 9.31 2.26 1.54 23.79
Harrison Twp - Roseville 3.61 9.92 4.34 14.20 4.26 2.89 39.21
Harrison Twp - Crooksville 3.93 11.87 5.16 16.27 4.55 2.97 44.74
Hopewell Twp - Glenford 2.24 8.58 2.95 13.62 2.59 2.04 32.02
Jackson Twp.-Junction City 3.61 11.36 3.91 15.24 3.97 2.79 40.88
Monroe Twp - Corning 2.07 7.03 3.01 9.75 2.75 1.60 26.20
Pike Twp - New Lex PERCO 3.92 15.67 26.68 34.73 7.55 3.87 92.43
Pike Twp - New Lex DD 3.99 14.79 4.79 25.32 4.48 3.61 56.98
Pike Twp - New Lex-HuffnPuff 3.14 11.41 3.55 19.08 3.79 2.98 43.95
Pike Twp - New Lex Sr Ctr 2.02 6.18 2.58 8.54 2.28 1.52 23.11
Reading Twp - Somerset Holy Trinity 3.68 13.85 4.69 21.46 4.32 3.28 51.27
Reading Twp - Somerset - Methodist 4.51 16.72 5.66 28.73 5.08 4.27 64.96
Salt Lick Twp - Hemlock 1.75 4.56 2.40 6.60 1.97 1.38 18.66
Salt Lick Twp - Shawnee 2.06 6.63 2.98 10.06 2.51 1.63 25.87
Thorn Twp - Church/Columbus 2.95 11.57 4.16 16.53 3.71 2.71 41.62
Thorn Twp - Thornville Grace Lutheran 3.65 14.26 4.58 21.37 4.32 3.42 51.58
Thorn Twp - Thornport 4.79 20.25 6.18 30.35 5.71 4.58 71.86
SUBTOTAL DROP-OFFS 157.52 655.80 1,824.04 382.11 644.10 751.79 17.77 200.01 4,633.14
nonferrous
COLLECTION EVENTS aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Coshocton Co. Coshocton County Recycling Office 9.49 9.49
County Litter Collection Coshocton County Recycling Office 26.20 26.20
Fairfield Co. Community Action 0.3 0.22 0.58 0.26 0.41 0.01 1.78
County Litter Collection Fairfield County Litter Collection 2.10 6.65 7.62 16.37
Licking Co. Licking Co.-recycling drives 8.50 8.50
Litter Collection Licking Co. Litter Collection 3.03 3.03
Perry Co. Ultimate Recycling Days 3.25 1.49 5.88 1.00 11.62
Litter Collection Perry County Recycling Office 11.29 11.29
SUBTOTAL COLLECTION EVENTS 0.32 0.22 0.58 2.36 0.41 0.01 3.25 1.49 62.54 1.00 16.12 88.28
nonferrous
PRIVATE RECYCLERS aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Private Transfer Stations Name Deleted 0.37 0.37
Name Deleted 11.65 11.65
Scrapyards/MRFs Name Deleted 463.00 10,052.00 3,069.00 13,584.00
Name Deleted 60.00 14.00 20.00 13.00 15.00 122.00
Name Deleted 0.75 0.04 0.85 1.35 1.65 4.64
Name Deleted 126.77 161.12 38.68 326.57
Name Deleted 0.50 2.80 0.20 0.70 4.20
Name Deleted 850.00 1,950.00 650.00 3,450.00
Name Deleted 225.00 2,500.00 1,200.00 50.00 3,975.00
Name Deleted 1,692.40 1,692.40
Name Deleted 1,232.76 1,232.76
Name Deleted 119.96 6,501.46 3,153.18 3,861.29 5,500.72 3.29 984.00 20,123.89
Tire recyclers Name Deleted 196.70 196.70
Private Recyclers Abitibi Paper Retriever Program 1,163.49 1,163.49
Abitibi Paper Retriever Program 2,002.66 2,002.66
Name Deleted 7.80 11.80 19.60
Name Deleted 1,789.00 1,542.79 3,778.00 14.91 4.05 7,128.74
Name Deleted 1.00 4.00 5.00
Name Deleted 500.00 1,000.00 240.00 1,740.00
Name Deleted 0.50 0.50 20.00 4.00 0.50 25.50
End Market Name Deleted 350.00 120.00 120.00 590.00
nonferrous
SUBTOTAL PRIVATE 179.96 3,953.77 387.00 6,885.73 3,273.18 7,147.94 5,500.76 13.00 3.29 17,206.41 2.29 8,744.65 3,990.61 30.58 5.35 984.00 333.43 29.65 0.70 58,672.29
nonferrous
YARD WASTE FACILITIES aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Fairfield Co. Name Deleted 44.52 44.52
Licking Co. Name Deleted 26.80 359.50 386.30
Name Deleted 437.67 15,911.67 16,349.33
Name Deleted 2,000.00 2,000.00
Name Deleted 487.00 244.00 731.00
Name Deleted 4,000.00 4,000.00
Perry Co. Name Deleted 207.35 207.35
SUBTOTAL YARD WASTE 7,454.01 15,911.67 244.00 359.50 23,969.17
INSTITUTIONAL AND nonferrous

COMMERCIAL aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
INSTITUTIONAL - DISTRICT FUNDED
Coshocton Co. Hopewell School 3.04 3.04
River View HS/MS 1.24 6.30 0.65 0.35 0.50 9.03
County Engineer 0.45 0.45
Courthouse 3.25 3.25
Annex 2.18 2.18
Juvenile Court 0.45 0.45
EMS 0.54 0.54
Title Bldg. 0.44 0.44
County Svc. 5.30 5.30
Jobs/Family Svc 5.35 5.35
Fairfield Co. Amanda Elementary 0.02 0.00 0.12 1.00 0.04 0.00 1.18
Amanda-Clearcreek MS/HS 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.09
Baltimore Head Start 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.31 0.05 0.01 0.47
Berne Union 0.12 0.01 3.87 5.44 0.11 0.06 9.62
Bloom Carroll HS 0.07 0.01 1.39 0.50 0.69 0.03 2.68
Bloom Carroll MS 0.01 0.00 0.10 0.12 0.02 0.00 0.26
Bremen Elementary 0.06 0.01 2.94 3.85 0.08 0.04 6.98
Daymar College 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.93 0.01 0.01 1.02
Fairfield Career Center 0.15 0.06 1.29 3.19 0.30 0.03 5.01
Fairfield Union 0.03 0.03 2.90 6.48 0.05 0.03 9.52
Fisher Catholic 0.01 0.01
General Sherman JH 2.99 0.15 3.14
Lancaster Community School 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.13
Lancaster Parks/Rec. 0.81 0.81
Ohio University Lancaster 0.56 0.26 3.63 4.62 1.13 0.21 10.39
Pickerington HS 0.03 3.45 0.03 3.51
Pleasantville Elementary 0.00 0.00 2.36 4.96 0.01 0.04 7.37
Ridgeview JH 0.07 0.02 0.12 0.84 0.11 0.01 1.17
Rushville Elementary 0.06 0.01 3.56 5.24 0.25 0.11 9.23
St. Bernadette 0.04 0.02 0.13 0.25 0.10 0.02 0.56
St. Mark's Head Start 0.18 0.13 0.52 2.80 0.34 0.07 4.04
St. Mary's Head Start 0.01 0.00 0.71 0.17 0.05 0.09 1.03
Sycamore Creek Elementary 0.00 0.01 1.15 0.03 1.19
Toll Gate Elementary 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.34 0.42
Utica Head Start 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.71 0.07 0.07 1.08
West Elementary 0.00 0.00 2.18 0.13 0.01 0.00 2.33
Agriculture Bldg 0.00 0.20 1.38 0.00 1.59
Berne Twp Trustees 0.03 0.03
Carroll Mcpl Bldg. 0.02 0.58 0.60
Clarence Miller Bldg. 0.00 0.09 4.10 0.00 4.19
Courthouse 0.00 0.00 0.78 3.49 0.01 0.00 4.29
Fairfield Co. Mcpl Courthouse 0.02 0.01 0.35 3.75 0.03 0.01 4.18
Fairfield Union Bus Garage 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.14 0.01 0.28
Jobs & Family Svc 0.03 0.01 0.65 5.25 0.05 6.00
Ohio Highway Patrol 0.19 0.06 0.25
USDA-Pickerington 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.78 0.07 0.88
Violet Twp. Admin 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.90 0.00 0.94
Licking Co. Administration Bldg. 0.29 0.04 1.59 0.39 2.31
Annex Bldg. 0.05 0.32 0.45 0.39 1.21
Child Support 0.30 0.14 5.42 0.32 6.17
City Admin. Bldg. 0.30 0.38 4.91 0.31 5.89
Courthouse 0.03 0.04 3.22 3.28
Extension Office 0.15 0.20 1.69 0.25 2.30
Job & Family Svc 0.12 0.26 0.13 0.17 0.67
Justice Center 0.02 0.02
nonferrous
LC Storage Bldg. 0.01 0.01
LCATS 0.12 0.09 1.45 0.24 1.90
Morgue 0.05 0.00 0.96 0.20 1.21
Moundbuilders Guidance 0.01 14.41 14.42
Recycling Office 0.05 0.02 0.11 0.04 0.21
Licking Heights HS 0.01 0.43 0.13 0.08 0.65
Perry Co. Crooksville HS 6.94 6.94
Glenford Elementary 1.91 3.23 5.13
New Lexington HS 0.05 0.00 4.13 3.26 0.24 0.06 7.74
New Lexington Middle School 3.83 4.06 7.89
New Lexington Elementary 3.17 2.57 5.74
Sheridan Middle School 3.29 0.03 0.03 3.34
Somerset Elementary 1.66 0.03 0.23 1.91
Thornville Elementary 1.60 0.44 2.04
Brown Circle Housing 0.79 1.70 0.92 2.45 1.04 0.69 7.58
Junction City School 2.43 2.19 4.62
Sheridan Drive 0.80 2.64 1.08 4.05 1.23 0.78 10.57
Hocking College 0.24 0.01 0.42 0.06 0.73
Millcreek Elementary 2.82 0.09 2.95 0.56 6.43
Sheridan High School 1.80 0.03 3.35 1.56 0.33 7.05
St. Rose 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.11 0.27 0.02 0.05 0.23 0.88
Board of Elections 0.12 0.33 0.01 0.05 0.50
Board of Health 0.09 0.00 0.07 0.02 0.19
Chamber of Commerce 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.02
County Home 0.02 0.02
Help Me Grow 0.01 0.01 0.02
Jobs & Family Svc 0.14 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.35
Litter & Recycling 0.00 0.01 0.01
New Lex Courthouse 0.26 0.03 1.48 0.02 0.26 2.05
New Lex School Admin 0.02 0.04 0.06
OSU Extension 0.09 0.05 0.15 0.07 0.36
Perry Co. Bd of Education 0.16 0.09 0.32 0.01 0.29 0.87
Residential, Inc. 0.03 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.09
Shawnee Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Juvenile Facility 0.00 0.31 0.18 0.12 0.16 0.07 0.84
BMV 0.17 0.31 0.00 0.12 0.60
District Library 0.00 0.08 0.62 0.32 0.89 0.08 0.51 2.52
Other Places 0.01 0.01
SUBTOTAL DISTRICT FUNDED INSTITUTIONAL 4.66 5.05 69.44 13.60 154.27 11.11 0.50 2.57 2.59 263.77
COMMERCIAL
Coshocton Co. Name Deleted 0.14 291.54 3.02 19.30 114.63 85.92 514.55
Name Deleted 74.48 0.25 74.73
Name Deleted 0.01 163.32 0.68 4.00 5.42 173.43
Name Deleted 72.00 1.00 0.10 73.10
Fairfield Co. Name Deleted 0.03 0.00 3.98 3.43 0.03 7.46
Name Deleted 0.01 0.00 0.08 1.50 0.02 0.00 1.61
Name Deleted 0.03 0.02 0.09 0.89 0.06 0.01 1.10
Name Deleted 0.05 0.03 0.73 1.37 0.11 0.01 2.29
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.31
Name Deleted 0.04 0.03 0.09 0.86 0.08 0.01 1.11
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 10.86 0.03 0.01 10.89
Name Deleted 0.02 0.01 8.53 0.50 0.15 0.32 9.52
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 10.75 0.05 0.22 0.49 11.52
Name Deleted 0.06 0.05 0.56 1.27 0.11 0.01 2.06
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.56
Name Deleted 0.02 0.01 0.09 0.51 0.05 0.01 0.70
Name Deleted 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.51 0.06 0.01 0.69
Name Deleted 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.28 0.06 0.01 0.45
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.18 0.01 0.20
Name Deleted 0.00 0.01 0.38 0.00 0.39
Name Deleted 0.23 0.02 0.06 1.01 0.09 0.01 1.42
Name Deleted 0.69 0.48 5.39 12.82 1.54 0.53 21.44
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.06 1.82 0.03 1.92
Name Deleted 0.06 0.05 0.24 0.79 0.10 0.03 1.28
nonferrous
Name Deleted 0.62 0.51 5.23 5.59 1.23 0.43 0.02 13.62
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.25
Name Deleted 0.06 0.03 0.21 1.38 0.16 0.02 1.85
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.25
Name Deleted 0.04 0.03 1.95 0.35 0.11 0.04 2.52
Name Deleted 0.05 0.03 1.08 1.05 0.15 0.04 2.40
Name Deleted 0.00 0.04 1.31 0.00 1.36
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.73 0.01 0.84
Name Deleted 0.02 0.00 2.00 0.44 0.04 0.02 2.51
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.10 0.01 0.00 2.19
Name Deleted 0.00 26.83 0.03 0.01 0.35 27.22
Name Deleted 0.11 0.10 0.50 2.28 0.19 0.04 3.22
Name Deleted 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.96 0.06 0.01 1.36
Name Deleted 0.05 4.53 0.00 4.57
Name Deleted 1.71 0.04 0.00 1.76
Name Deleted 0.18 0.10 1.43 1.84 0.32 0.04 3.91
Name Deleted 0.05 0.03 8.68 0.26 0.16 0.03 9.19
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.38 0.01 0.00 0.43
Name Deleted 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.72 0.06 0.93
Name Deleted 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.40 0.06 0.00 0.57
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.74 1.77 0.01 0.00 2.53
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.93 0.02 1.02
Name Deleted 0.05 0.04 0.23 1.16 0.09 0.02 1.59
Name Deleted 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.07
Name Deleted 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.03 0.01 0.18
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.96 0.05 0.00 3.07
Name Deleted 0.00 1.12 0.07 0.00 1.19
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.07 1.32 0.02 0.01 1.44
Name Deleted 0.20 0.15 1.84 2.75 0.40 0.03 5.37
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 15.89 0.05 0.05 0.01 15.99
Name Deleted 0.04 0.03 0.14 0.44 0.07 0.02 0.72
Name Deleted 0.00 0.03 0.52 0.01 0.57
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.34 0.03 0.01 0.46
Name Deleted 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.23 0.03 0.00 0.34
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.51 0.09 0.18 0.88
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.10 0.00 1.10
Name Deleted 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.14
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.85 0.10 0.04 0.26 1.27
Name Deleted 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.57 0.05 0.01 0.78
Name Deleted 0.09 0.08 0.28 0.77 0.23 0.11 1.56
Name Deleted 0.02 0.02 0.06 0.60 0.05 0.01 0.75
Name Deleted 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.86 0.02 0.00 0.97
Name Deleted 0.07 0.04 0.47 1.28 0.11 0.00 1.97
Name Deleted 0.02 0.01 0.45 1.18 0.04 0.01 1.70
Name Deleted 0.03 0.02 0.16 2.11 0.06 0.01 0.00 2.39
Name Deleted 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.42 0.01 0.00 0.43
Name Deleted 7.46 0.93 0.05 8.44
Name Deleted 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.25
Name Deleted 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.54 0.09 0.01 0.79
Name Deleted 0.39 1,067.82 3.92 49.17 434.38 237.25 1,792.93
Name Deleted 57.80 2.38 82.92 126.38 269.48
nonferrous
Name Deleted 214.53 9.45 5.74 4.00 3.72 237.44
Name Deleted 207.85 0.51 208.36
Name Deleted 185.69 17.28 202.97
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 1.31 1.31
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 156.28 156.28
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 134.58 18.61 153.19
SCI (commercial) 180.0 2.5 50.0 78.0 290.0 59.6 3.5 2.0 40.7 93.0 481.9 1,281.25
Licking Co. Licking County Jail 277.00 277.00
Name Deleted 0.30 809.37 4.92 42.51 245.79 177.90 1,280.79
Name Deleted 58.65 4.67 56.11 127.34 246.77
Name Deleted 54.63 1.19 81.70 137.52
Name Deleted 93.06 4.78 4.87 1.86 104.57
Name Deleted 155.89 0.42 156.31
Name Deleted 56.85 7.76 64.61
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 0.27 3.01 70.66 6.46 2.02 1.15 0.47 84.04
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 2,990.00 195.00 54.00 3,239.00
Perry Co. Name Deleted 83.14 0.17 83.31
Private Hauler Commercial Routes 0.12 1.34 0.48 2.88 0.90 0.52 0.21 6.45
SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL 3.30 1.23 14.02 8,710.53 12.52 374.85 294.39 9.42 3.16 508.48 277.00 59.60 3.50 3.05 376.12 0.10 93.00 794.80 982.99 12,522.07
INDUSTRIES IN COMMERCIAL SIC CODES

Name Deleted 13.90 3.90 0.50 0.80 19.10
Name Deleted 9,000.00 9,000.00
Name Deleted 12.00 0.50 0.10 12.60
Name Deleted 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08
Name Deleted 30.00 600.00 630.00
Name Deleted 135.00 36.00 360.00 950.00 200.00 270.00 1,951.00
Name Deleted 0.50 10.00 10.50
Name Deleted 32.00 14.00 0.60 19.90 24.40 90.90
Name Deleted 220.00 5.00 225.00
SUBTOTAL INDUSTRIES IN COMMERCIAL SIC CODES 148.05 0.01 361.79 26.50 360.61 1,237.81 306.00 8.90 9,824.40 0.60 270.80 12,545.47
SUBTOTAL INSTITUTIONAL AND COMMERCIAL 7.96 149.28 19.08 9,141.76 26.12 555.62 666.11 9.92 5.73 1,746.29 277.00 59.60 306.00 3.50 11.95 10,200.52 2.59 0.70 93.00 794.80 1,253.79 25,331.31
nonferrous
INCINERATION aluminum scrap glass occ onp paper PET HDPE steel ferrous commingled appliances tires yard waste oil wood magazines batteries elect. Scrap food other TOTALS
Licking Co. Animal Control 3.5 3.50
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL-INSTITUTIONAL-COMMERCIAL RECYCLIN 349.18 4,125.50 1,338.20 17,960.20 4,218.04 8,581.25 7,031.52 40.69 212.78 18,994.79 1,433.99 8,805.74 4,359.15 7,457.51 43.53 26,117.54 986.59 334.13 138.77 1,038.80 1,617.49 115,185.37
PAPER RETRIEVER LOCATIONS
REFERENCE YEAR 2012
Fairfield County
ACHS - 328 E. Main St.
Fairfield Christian Church - 3420 Blacklick Eastern Rd.
Trinity UCC Youth Group - 105 N. High St.
Tussing Elementary II - 9704 Basil Western Rd.
Bloom Carroll HS - 5240 Plum Rd
Shalom United Methodist Church - 4925 Plum Rd.
Victory Hill Church - 4000 Coonpath Rd. NW
Cedar Heights Elementary - 1515 Cedar Hill Rd.
Chief Tarhe Elementary - 425 N. Whittier St.
East Elementary - 751 E. Wheeling St.
Emanuel Lutheran Church - 231 E. Mulberry St.
Fairfield Christian Academy - 1965 N. Columbus St.
Faith Memorial Church - 2610 W. Fair Ave.
First Impressions - 2642 St. Rt. 22 NW
First Presbyterian - 222 N. Broad St.
First United Methodist - 163 E. Wheeling St.
Forest Rose School - 1592 Granville Pike
General Sherman Jr HS - 701 Union St.
Grace United Methodist Church - 1185 Pleasantville Rd.
Hocking Valley Gymnastics Boosters - 810 Slocum St.
Kroger - 1735 N. Memorial Dr.
Lancaster Campground - 2151 W. Fair Ave.
Lancaster HS - 1312 Granville Pike
Medill Elementary - 1151 James Rd.
Mills Memorial UMC - 402 N. Broad St.
Ohio University - 1570 Granville Pike
Redeemer Lutheran Church - 1400 Concordia Dr.
Sanderson Elementary - 1450 Marietta Rd.
South Elementary - 220 E. Walnut St.
St. Mary's School - 309 W. Chestnut St.
St. Bernadette Catholic Church - 1343 Wheeling Rd.
St. Peter's Lutheran - 105 E. Mulberry
Tallmadge Elementary - 611 Lewis Ave.
Thomas Ewing Jr. High - 825 E. Fair Ave.
The Wagnalls Memorial Foundation - 150 E. Columbus St.
Walmart - 2687 N. Memorial Dr.
West Elementary - 625 Garfield Ave.
William V. Fischer Catholic HS - 1803 Granville Pike
YMCA - 465 W. 6th Ave.
Lithopolis UMC - 80 N. Market St.
USPS - 260 W. Columbus St.
Millersport Elementary/High - 11850 Lancaster St.
Millersport United Methodist - 2310 Refugee St.
Diley MS - 750 Preston Trails
Pleasantville Village Office - 207 W. Columbus St.
Pickerington Epiphany Lutheran - 268 Hill Rd N.
Fairfield Elementary - 13000 Coventry Ave.
Harmon MS - 12410 Harmon Rd. NW
Heritage Elementary - 100 East St.
Holy Redeemer Lutheran - 10709 Blacklick Eastern Rd.
Kroger - 1045 Hill Rd.
Kroger - 7833 Refugee Rd.
Lakeview Jr. High - 12455 Ault Rd.
Ohio University Pickerington - 12933 Stonecreek Dr.
Peace United Methodist Church - 235 Diley Rd.
Pickerington Elementary - 775 Long Rd.
Pickerington High School Central - 300 Opportunity Way
Pickerington High School North - 7800 Refugee Rd.
Pickerington Ridgeview Jr. High - 130 Hill Rd. South
Public Library - 201 Opportunity Way
Pope John XXIII Parish - 7820 White Ash Ct.
Public Library Pickerington - 201 Opportunity Way
Senior Center - 600 Hill Rd. North
Seton Parish - 600 Hill Rd. North
St. Andrew Episcopal Church - 8630 Refugee Rd.
Sycamore Creek Church - 8100 Refugee Rd.
Toll Gate Elementary /MS - 12089 Toll Gate Rd.
Violet Elementary - 8855 Education Dr.
Tussing Elementary - 7117 Tussing Rd.
Licking County
Alexandria Elementary - College St.

Fireman's Park - 60 Mill St.
Our Lady of Mt. Carmel - 5133 Walnut Rd.
Historical Society - 225 Freeman Memorial
Village Office - 5192 Walnut Rd.
USPS - 4717 Walnut Rd.
Croton Church of Christ - 40 S. Main St.
Elementary - 210 N. Granger St.
High School - 248 New Burg St.
Intermediate - 2025 Burg St.
Jr. High - 210 New Burg St.
Welsh Hills School - 2610 Newark-Granville Rd.
Garfield Elementary - 680 30th St.
High School - 300 Licking View Dr.
Licking County Christian Academy - 81 Licking View Dr.
Kroger - 910 Hebron Rd.
Stevenson Elementary - 152 Cynthia St.
UM Mens Group - 1149 Hebron Rd.
Hebron Elementary - 709 Deacon St.
Jackson Elementary - 9380 Lancer Rd.
Kroger - 600 E. Main St.
Lakewood High School - 9331 Lancers Rd.
USPS - 789 Hebron Rd.
ODNR - 9600 Jacksontown Rd.
Adams Middle School - 80 W. Maple St.
Admin. Bldg. - 599 S. Main St.
Church of the Ascension - 555 S. Main St.
Kroger - 659 W. Coshocton St.
Northridge Middle School - 6066 Johnstown-Utica Rd.
Searfoss Elementary - 85 W. Douglas St.
USPS - 211 W. Coshocton St.
Kirkersville Elementary - 215 CR 40
Emmanuel Church - 9441 Smoke Rd.
Etna Elementary School - 8500 Columbia Rd.
Hosanna Lutheran Church - 7714 Hazelton-Etna Rd.
Jersey Baptist Church - 13260 Morse Rd.
Kindergarten Center - 927-B South St.
Kroger - 350 E. Broad St.
Nazarene Church - 8100 Hazelton-Etna Rd.
Pataskala Elementary - 395 S. High St.
Watkins Memorial High School - 8868 Watkins Rd.
Watkins Middle School - 8808 Watkins Rd. SW
USPS - 175 E. Broad St.
Advocate - 22 N. First St.
Blessed Sacrement School - 411 E. Main
Board of MRDD - 65 W. Church St.
Brown's Distributing - 51 Swans Rd.
Carson Elementary - 549 E. Main St.
Cherry Valley Elementary - 1040 W. Main St.
Cherry Valley Lodge - 2299 Cherry Valley Rd.
County Annex - 675 Price Rd.
East of Chicago Pizza - 1234 W. Church St.
ES Weiant Center - 116 N. 22nd St.
First United Methodist Church - 88 N. 5th St.
Flory Park - 650 W. Church St.
Flying Colors Preschool - 119 Union St.
Heritage Middle School - 600 Arlington Ave.
Hillview Elementary - 1927 Horns Hill Rd.
Jobs and Family Svc. - 74 S. Second St.
John Clem Elementary - 621 Mt. Vernon Rd. (temp)
Last Call Outreach Ministries - 310 Everett Ave.
Leader Printing - 56 Westgate Dr.
Legend Elementary - 1075 Evans Blvd.
Levin Park - 1170 Sharon Valley Rd.
Liberty Middle School - 1055 Evans Blvd.
Licking Valley High School - 100 Hainsvew Dr.
Licking Valley Intermediate/Primary - 1510 Licking Valley Rd.
Marne United Methodist Church - 1019 Licking Valley Rd.
McGuffey Elementary - 130 Green Wave Dr.
Matesich Distributing - 1190 E. Main St.
Newark Catholic HS - 1 Green Wave Dr.
Newark High School - 314 Granville St.
Newark Nazarene - Kid City - 200 S. Williams St.
Newark Public Library - 101 W. Main St.
Newton Elementary - 6645 Mt. Vernon Rd.
OSU Newark - Founders Hall, 1179 University Dr.
Pathways of Licking County - 1627 Bryn Mawr Dr.
St. Francis De Sales - 38 Granville St.
St. Paul't Evangelical Lutheran Church - 67 N. 5th St.
Second Presbyterian Church - 42 E. Church St.
Service Complex - 1195 E. Main St.
Shumaker Distributing - 692 W. Church St.
USPS - 70 E. Church St.
Water Office - 34 S. Fourth St.
Wilson Middle School - 805 W. Church St.
Taylor Rd. Elementary - 8200 Taylor Rd. SW
Licking Heights HS - 4000 Mink Rd. SW
Licking Heights South Elementary - 6623 Summit Rd. SW
Licking Heights West Elementary - 1490 Climbing Fig Dr.
Summit Elementary - 6539 Summit Rd.
Elementary School - 145 Mill St.
Jr. High - 260 N. Jefferson St
PAPER RETRIEVER LOCATIONS IN FAIRFIELD COUNTY
Amanda ACHS - 328 E. Main St.

Baltimore Fairfield Christian Church - 3420 Blacklick Eastern Rd.
Trinity UCC Youth Group - 105 N. High St.
Carroll Bloom Carroll HS - 5240 Plum Rd.
Shalom United Methodist Church - 4925 Plum Rd.
Victory Hill Church - 4000 Coonpath Rd. NW
Lancaster Cedar Heights Elementary - 1515 Cedar Hill Rd.
Chief Tarhe Elementary - 425 N. Whittier St.
East Elementary - 751 E. Wheeling St.
Emanuel Lutheran Church - 231 E. Mulberry St.
Fairfield Christian Academy - 1965 N. Columbus St.
Faith Memorial Church - 2610 W. Fair Ave.
First Impressions - 2642 St. Rt. 22 NW
First Presbyterian - 222 N. Broad St.
First United Methodist - 163 E. Wheeling St.
Forest Rose School - 1592 Granville Pike
General Sherman Jr HS - 701 Union St.
Grace United Church - 1185 Pleasantville Rd.
Hocking Valley Gymnastics Boosters - 810 Slocum St.
Kroger - 1735 N. Memorial Dr.
Lancaster Campground - 2151 W. Fair Ave.
Lancaster HS - 1312 Granville Pike
Medill Elementary - 1151 James Rd.
Mills Memorial UMC - 402 N. Broad St.
Ohio Univ. - 1570 Granville Pike
Redeemer Lutheran Church - 1400 Concordia Dr.
Sanderson Elementary - 1450 Marietta Rd.
South Elementary - 220 E. Walnut St.
St. Mary's School - 309 W. Chestnut St.
St. Bernadette Catholic Church - 1343 Wheeling Rd.
St. Peter's Lutheran - 105 E. Mulberry
Tallmadge Elementary - 611 Lewis Ave.
Thomas Ewing Jr. High - 825 E. Fair Ave.
The Wagnalls Memorial Foundation - 150 E. Columbus St.
Walmart - 2687 N. Memorial Dr.
West Elementary - 625 Garfield Ave.
William V. Fischer Catholic HS - 1803 Granville Pike
YMCA - 465 W. 6th Ave.
Lithopolis United Methodist Church - 80 N. Market St.
USPS - 260 W. Columbus St.
Millersport Millersport Elementary/High - 11850 Lancaster St.
Millersport United Methodist - 2310 Refugee St.
Pleasantville Village Office - 207 W. Columbus St.
Pickerington Diley MS - 750 Preston Trails
Epiphany Lutheran Church - 268 Hill Rd N.
Fairfield Elementary - 13000 Coventry Ave.
Harmon MS - 12410 Harmon Rd. NW
Heritage Elementary - 100 East St.
Holy Redeemer Lutheran - 10709 Blacklick Eastern Rd.
Kroger - 1045 Hill Rd.
Kroger - 7833 Refugee Rd.
Lakeview Jr. High - 12455 Ault Rd.
Ohio Univ. - 12933 Stonecreek Dr.
Peace United Methodist Church - 235 Diley Rd.
Pickerington Elementary - 775 Long Rd.
Pickerington High School Central - 300 Opportunity Way
Pickerington High School North - 7800 Refugee Rd.
Pickerington Ridgeview Jr. High - 130 Hill Rd. South
Pope John XXIII Parish - 7820 White Ash Court
Public Library - 201 Opportunity Way
Senior Center - 150 Hereford Dr.
Seton Parish - 600 Hill Rd. North
St. Andrew Episcopal Church - 8630 Refugee Rd.
Sycamore Creek Church - 8100 Refugee Rd.
Sycamore Creek Elementary - 500 Sycamore Creek St.
Toll Gate Elementary/MS - 12089 Toll Gate Rd.
Violet Elementary - 8855 Education Dr.
Reynoldsburg Tussing Elementary - 7117 Tussing Rd.
PAPER RETRIEVER LOCATIONS IN LICKING COUNTY
Alexandria Alexandria Elementary - College St.

Fireman's Park - 60 Mill St.
Buckeye Lake Our Lady of Mt. Carmel - 5133 Walnut Rd.
Historical Society - 225 Freeman Memorial
Village Office - 5192 Walnut Rd.
USPS - 4717 Walnut Rd.
Croton Croton Church of Christ - 40 S. Main St.
Granville Elementary - 210 N. Granger St.
High School - 248 New Burg St.
Intermediate - 2025 Burg St.
Jr. High - 210 New Burg St.
Welsh Hills School - 2610 Newark-Granville Rd.
Heath Garfield Elementary - 680 30th St.
High School - 300 Licking View Dr.
Licking County Christian Academy - 81 Licking View Dr.
Kroger - 910 Hebron Rd.
Stevenson Elementary - 152 Cynthia St.
UM Mens Group - 1149 Hebron Rd.
Hebron Hebron Elementary - 709 Deacon St.
Jackson Elementary - 9380 Lancer Rd.
Kroger - 600 E. Main St.
Lakewood High School - 9331 Lancers Rd.
USPS - 789 Hebron Rd.
Jacksontown ODNR - 9600 Jacksontown Rd.
Johnstown Adams Middle School - 80 W. Maple St.
Admin. Bldg. - 599 S. Main St.
Church of the Ascension - 555 S. Main St.
Kroger - 659 W. Coshocton St.
Northridge Middle School - 6066 Johnstown-Utica Rd.
Searfoss Elementary - 85 W. Douglas St.
USPS - 211 W. Coshocton St.
Kirkersville Kirkersville Elementary - 215 CR 40
Pataskala Emmanuel Church - 9441 Smoke Rd.
Etna Elementary School - 8500 Columbia Rd.
Hosanna Lutheran Church - 7714 Hazelton-Etna Rd.
Jersey Baptist Church - 13260 Morse Rd.
Kindergarten Center - 927-B South St.
Kroger - 350 E. Broad St.
Nazarene Church - 8100 Hazelton-Etna Rd.
Pataskala Elementary - 395 S. High St.
Watkins Memorial High School - 8868 Watkins Rd.
Watkins Middle School - 8808 Watkins Rd. SW
USPS - 175 E. Broad St.
Newark Advocate - 22 N. First St.
Blessed Sacrement School - 411 E. Main
Board of MRDD - 65 W. Church St.
Brown's Distributing - 51 Swans Rd.
Carson Elementary - 549 E. Main St.
Cherry Valley Elementary - 1040 W. Main St.
Cherry Valley Lodge - 2299 Cherry Valley Rd.
County Annex - 675 Price Rd.
East of Chicago Pizza - 1234 W. Church St.
ES Weiant Center - 116 N. 22nd St.
First United Methodist Church - 88 N. 5th St.
Flory Park - 650 W. Church St.
Flying Colors Preschool - 119 Union St.
Heritage Middle School - 600 Arlington Ave.
Hillview Elementary - 1927 Horns Hill Rd.
Jobs and Family Svc. - 74 S. Second St.
John Clem Elementary - 621 Mt. Vernon Rd. (temp)
Last Call Outreach Ministries - 310 Everett Ave.
Leader Printing - 56 Westgate Dr.
Legend Elementary - 1075 Evans Blvd.
Levin Park - 1170 Sharon Valley Rd.
Liberty Middle School - 1055 Evans Blvd.
Licking Valley High School - 100 Hainsvew Dr.
Licking Valley Intermediate/Primary - 1510 Licking Valley Rd.
Marne United Methodist Church - 1019 Licking Valley Rd.
McGuffey Elementary - 130 Green Wave Dr.
Matesich Distributing - 1190 E. Main St.
Newark Catholic HS - 1 Green Wave Dr.
Newark High School - 314 Granville St.
Newark Nazarene - Kid City - 200 S. Williams St.
Newark Public Library - 101 W. Main St.
Newton Elementary - 6645 Mt. Vernon Rd.
OSU Newark - Founders Hall, 1179 University Dr.
Pathways of Licking County - 1627 Bryn Mawr Dr.
St. Francis De Sales - 38 Granville St.
St. Paul't Evangelical Lutheran Church - 67 N. 5th St.
Second Presbyterian Church - 42 E. Church St.
Service Complex - 1195 E. Main St.
Shumaker Distributing - 692 W. Church St.
USPS - 70 E. Church St.
Water Office - 34 S. Fourth St.
Wilson Middle School - 805 W. Church St.
Reynolsburg Taylor Rd. Elementary - 8200 Taylor Rd. SW
Summit Station Licking Heights HS - 4000 Mink Rd. SW
Licking Heights South Elementary - 6623 Summit Rd. SW
Licking Heights West Elementary - 1490 Climbing Fig Dr.
Utica Summit Elementary - 6539 Summit Rd.
Elementary School - 145 Mill St.
Jr. High - 260 N. Jefferson St.
Appendix G
Documentation of Provision of
Services and Capacity
WASTE REDUCTION-RECYCLING PROGRAMS IN PLACE IN REFERENCE YEAR
WITH UPDATES TO 2014
1. Curbside Recycling
The curbside recycling activities that were operating in the District in the reference year are listed in Chapter
III of this Plan in Table III-4.
Non-subscription Curbside: Communities that contracted with a private hauler to provide waste collection
plus curbside recycling services to all their residents at no additional charge in the reference year were -
Coshocton in Coshocton County, Lithopolis, Berne Township and Madison Township in Fairfield County, and
Pataskala and Johnstown in Licking County. The cost of the Berne/Madison program is subsidized by the
District ($8,096) and the townships ($9,320).
Subscription Curbside - Contract: Communities that contracted with private haulers to provide curbside
recycling services to those residents willing to pay extra for the service were a mix of large municipalities (ie.,
Pickerington), small villages (ie., Lithopolis), and many townships (see Table III-4 for a full listing). In order to
receive service, residents are required to register with the hauler to arrange receipt of a bin and set up billing.
There has been no District cost involved with these programs.
Subscription Curbside - Individual: The District is served by many private haulers that contract directly with
individual customers to provide services. One company may have multiple subdivisions operating
independently within the District. Each has its own policy about what services they offer, and to whom.
Annual surveys to townships and municipalities ask if their residents can access such services through their
hauler. Responses fluctuate each year and there is no means of getting a headcount per jurisdiction of those
using curbside services. There has been no District cost involved with private residential subscription service.
Update: The above programs are still operating. Since 2012, Harrison Township has contracted with Big-O for
waste collection and subscription curbside. Beginning in October of 2013, the villages of Carroll and
Pleasantville jointly bid a trash/recycling contract that included non-subscription curbside service for their
residents. Beginning in 2014, McKean Township and the village of Hebron in Licking County implemented
subscription curbside. In April 2014, the village of Somerset in Perry County implemented subscription
curbside through a contract with Waste Management.
Responsible entity: Local government (cities, villages, and townships) and/or the private haulers are
responsible for all of the curbside programs operating in the District. The CFLP District has a long history of
customers choosing their own waste hauler. Rates are kept competitive by the large number of haulers
available to provide service. Franchising large population areas has been slower here than in many other
areas, but the pace has accelerated in the last five years. Communities that decide to franchise waste
collection take their cue from their residents whether or not to include recycling as a mandatory or optional
part of the contract. For example, the city of Pickerington made the decision in 2007 to contract for trash with
curbside as an option – at the expense of individual residents who sign up for the service. With that action,
they pleased the population opposed to the cost of recycling, as well as the population willing to pay extra for
the service. This evolution (versus a revolution) allows private haulers that are not equipped to provide
curbside recycling services the time to adjust their operations, or limit their customers to waste only contracts.
The District's approach to curbside has been to support the communities in their decisions and assist wherever
possible, but not to push a specific type of program on them that may not be what their residents want or their
local government budgets can afford. It is not the policy of the District to mandate programs for which
sustained, permanent funding is not available, but to support them as they are initiated locally.
Area of benefit: The primary benefit goes to the residents and local governments where curbside programs
operate. The programs assist the District in reaching required recycling and access goals.
Amount and type of material reduced and recycled: Curbside programs used to demonstrate access take at
least aluminum and steel containers, plastics #1 and #2, newspaper, and cardboard. Most also take glass
and other paper. The materials collected by each of the curbside programs are listed in Table III-4. The
amount that was recycled by each individual program in 2012 is listed in Table IV-6, if the amount was
reported for the specific program. Each community or private hauler chooses the materials to include in their
programs.
Measurement method: The District continues to monitor the populations of each county, and the programs
that serve each jurisdiction in order to demonstrate that at least 90% access is being provided.
In the reference year, 50% of residents in Coshocton County had access to curbside recycling services if they
chose to use them. However, using OEPA formulas to calculate access credit, curbside service provided
access to 35% of residents. There has been no access change since 2012.
In the reference year, 36% of Fairfield County residents had the opportunity to use curbside recycling collection
services. However, using OEPA formulas to calculate access credit, curbside service provided access to 13% of
the population in 2012. Adding the population of Carroll and Pleasantville in 2013 increased this to 14%.
In the reference year, 79% of Licking County residents had the opportunity to use curbside recycling collection
services. However, using OEPA formulas to calculate access credit, curbside service provided access to 29% of
the residents in 2012. Adding the population of Harrison Township in 2013 increases this to 30%.
Program Review: Since the inception of the District contract program in 1993, funds have been made
available for the start-up of new curbside recycling activities, or the support of ongoing programs. The city of
Lancaster made use of this funding to purchase a curbside recycling truck - which was given to Bremen when
Lancaster discontinued its curbside recycling program. In 2013, Bremen discontinued its curbside service as
too expensive and switched to a drop-off trailer. No other community has shown interest in creating their own
recycling infrastructure. Fairfield County has chosen to use a portion of their recycling funding to support the
program in Berne and Madison Townships.
The table at the end of this description demonstrates that curbside programs are not diverting more waste
than drop-off recycling, but they do reduce the need for the District to provide additional services. This trend
toward self-sustaining recycling programs will be encouraged and promoted by the District.
2. District Funded Drop-off Recycling

In order to meet the minimum 90% residential access required in all of the four counties, the District
implemented a county-managed drop-off recycling program in 2000. The current system of each county
choosing its means of collection and processing independent of one another stems from the beginning of the
program. Perry County began its program first and used small sheds assembled by high school Shop students
to minimize cost. Collection and processing was contracted to Perco's recycling group as the sole respondent
to a request for proposals. Licking and Coshocton Counties began at the same time and jointly purchased
Alleycat trailers and Ford pickup trucks. At that time, no private haulers were interested in providing the
service, so the counties hired personnel, which they shared to increase cost efficiency. Fairfield County initially
purchased a variety of trailers with different designs, and later standardized with Alleycat trailers. Much of the
original equipment is still in use. The local Community Action agency was chosen as the best respondent to a
request for proposal and has continued to provide the service.
The drop-off locations that were available in the District in the reference year are listed in Table III-5. Common
to all county programs is a contract between the District and the County to collect and market materials from
drop-off locations which will fulfill the access requirement. Each contract describes minimum standards for
capacity, signage, hours available, and reporting of tons collected. Each county chooses its method of
implementation, either direct provision of services with county staff, or a subcontract to a private company. As
a result, the cost per ton, cost per site, and cost per person is not consistent between the counties.
Coshocton County: Nine permanent full service rural drop-off locations were used to provide residential access
in Coshocton County in the reference year. The drop-off sites are served by compartmentalized trailers and
rolloff containers which are available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The materials accepted are
aluminum and steel cans, paper including magazines, newsprint, and office paper, corrugated cardboard,
paperboard, and plastic bottles. Periodically, the trailer is replaced by an empty trailer and is hauled to a
recycler for processing and marketing. The program is managed and operated by the Coshocton County
Recycling Office, under the supervision of the Coshocton County Commissioners. No changes to the number or
locations of sites have been made since the reference year. The change is that in choosing a new processor,
the kinds of plastic containers that are accepted expanded from #1 and #2 only, to #1-7 in 2013. There is no
cost to the district for processing the materials.
Fairfield County: Eighteen full service, urban drop-off locations and five full service rural drop-off locations
contributed toward the access requirement for Fairfield County in the reference year. Fairfield County uses
compartmentalized trailers, and at some locations, roll-off containers for cardboard. The drop-off sites are
available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. The materials accepted are aluminum and steel cans,
colored and clear glass bottles and jars, paper including magazines, newsprint, and office paper, corrugated
cardboard, paperboard, and #1 and #2 plastic bottles. The program is managed and operated by the
Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action Recycling Center through a subcontract with Fairfield County
Commissioners. The agency collects the material, processes it at the Recycling Center and markets the
material. Since the end of 2012, 2 urban locations were removed at the request of the site hosts, 2 urban
locations were added to the Lancaster area and one rural location was added in Richland Township to achieve
the required 90% access.
Licking County: Fourteen full service, urban drop-off locations and ten full service rural drop-off locations
fulfilled the access requirement for Licking County in 2012. The drop-off bin program used mostly single
material roll-off containers in 2012, and operated generally in the same way as does the Coshocton County
program. The materials accepted were aluminum and steel cans, paper including magazines and newsprint,
corrugated cardboard, and #1 and #2 plastic bottles. The program was managed and operated by the Licking
County Recycling Office under supervision of the Licking County Commissioners. Materials were collected by
county employees and taken to a private processor for baling and marketing (at no cost to the district). In mid-
2013, Licking County made a significant change in the drop-off recycling program mid-year by contracting out
the operation of the residential collection and processing services to Rumpke Recycling, Inc. with 8 cubic yard
front-load roll-off containers provided by Rumpke. Materials expanded to include all colors of glass, more
plastic containers, and all paper grades and were commingled in the containers to be sorted at Rumpke's
Material Recovery Facility in Columbus. This change dropped the cost from $168 per ton to $47 per ton.
Feedback from residents has been overwhelmingly positive regarding the change. Since 2012, one urban
location was removed as under-utilized, one full serve urban and one full serve rural site have been reinstated.
Perry County: Six full service, urban drop-off locations and thirteen full service rural drop-off locations fulfilled
the access requirement for Perry County in 2012. The equipment used was recycling sheds that contain
wheeled carts, and rolloff containers. PerCo, Inc., a workshop program operated by Perry County Ohio Board of
DD, collects, processes and markets the material under a subcontract with Perry County Commissioners.
PerCo staff collects materials from the recycling buildings and containers and returns them to PerCo's MRF
where they are sorted and processed by clients for shipping. The materials accepted are aluminum and steel
cans, brown and clear glass bottles and jars, paper including magazines, newsprint, and office paper,
corrugated cardboard, and #1 and #2 plastic bottles. Since 2012, one full service rural site has been
removed.
Responsible entity: The four counties implement residential recycling programs with funding from the District
(via annual contracts) and with the cooperation of the cities, villages, townships, non-profits, and businesses.
The cooperating entities may provide drop-off locations and assist in maintaining the sites. District contracts
with counties specify the services that must be provided, however it is up to each county to choose the means
by which to provide the service.
Area of benefit: In general, the drop-off locations serve the immediate surrounding area - the city, township
and/or village in which the site is located. The drop-off program is designed to be a network, which in
combination with curbside recycling programs and private recyclers, serves the entire area of each of the four
counties. Although it is not cost-efficient to place a recycling drop-off in every small community, almost all
district residents live within five miles of a permanent recycling drop-off location.
Amount and type of materials recycled: In 2012, approximately 4,633 tons of materials were reported as
collected through county drop-off locations. At a minimum the following materials are collected by all of the
programs: aluminum and steel cans, newsprint, corrugated cardboard, and plastic bottles #1 and #2. Glass
containers and other types of paper and plastic are options for the various programs.
Method of Measurement: To measure compliance with access requirements, the District assures that annual
contracts contain sites that will provide access (in combination with existing curbside programs) to at least
90% of the population.
To measure progress toward Goal #2, county program managers report quarterly the pounds per site per
month collected. Because none of the counties use scales, the weight is estimated by weighing a full container
of each material, and extrapolating the pounds that would be contained for half full, quarter full, etc. With the
change of the Licking County program, each container is weighed by the truck as it is emptied, so weights will
be more accurate but it is a total of all commingled materials. Periodic sorts at the private processing facility
will give a general idea as to the composition for each material.
Program Review: The greatest strength of the current unmanned drop-off containers throughout the District is
the assurance that there is consistent, around-the-clock free recycling access for residents that is not
dependent on market prices for materials. Sites are always available and frequent collection assures
residents that there will be ample space for their materials once they get to the site. There is no fee, so
residents can affordably use them as often as they wish. Because they are not operated to make a profit, they
will not be removed if market prices drop - a casualty of many past private recycling programs. The location of
drop-off bins is convenient, with almost all residents of the District living within 5 miles of a drop-off site.
The uniformity of the District contracts with counties ensures that the same standards are met throughout the
District and meet state requirements for capacity, signage and service. Each site accepts at least aluminum
and steel cans, newspaper, cardboard and plastic #1 and #2. This consistency ensures that residents can
recycle these materials no matter which site they use. There is still a disparity between counties for glass,
paperboard and plastics which is due to limits of the processing facilities used.
After the initial purchase price, the cost of servicing the containers is relative to their use. The more they are
used, the more often they must be emptied and the higher the costs for personnel, equipment maintenance
and vehicle expense. However, the higher costs may be somewhat offset by greater efficiency in the use of
staff and equipment and by the value of the materials collected when market conditions are favorable.
The program also has disadvantages. The design of the Alleycat trailers, which at the time of purchase were
state of the art, results in one material bin filling before the entire trailer is full, thus requiring the trailer to be
pulled before it is completely full. Even the use of rolloff containers, while more efficient than Alleycat trailers,
requires multiple trips from each collection site to empty each container individually at a processing center -
which is time and labor intensive.
Unmanned sites can lead to open dumping, vandalism, and even theft if they are not in highly-visible secure
locations. Dumping creates unsafe conditions, discourages residents from using the sites, adds to the cost of
disposal and sends a negative message to the general public about the program. If left unresolved, it leads to
requests from the host to remove the site.
Site choice has a direct and significant impact on tons recycled. If sites are placed in high-traffic, easily visible
and accessible locations near population densities, they will attract more material. If they are placed where
they cannot be easily found, are in low traffic areas, or require walking through mud to access the container,
they will not divert a significant amount of material.
To address the container design issue, Licking County transitioned from the Dempster Alleycats to single-
material roll-off containers - then to front-load roll-off containers for commingled materials, eliminating much of
the equipment maintenance cost, minimizing theft of aluminum and using the container capacity more
efficiently. Perry County is transitioning from their buildings that contain carts for each material to segmented
roll-off containers to increase efficiency in collection. Coshocton and Fairfield Counties have supplemented
Alleycat trailers with roll-off containers for cardboard to help with site overload of that one material, and are
gradually replacing Alleycat trailers as more efficient equipment is available.
It is anticipated that the number of drop-off locations will continue to grow in Licking and Fairfield Counties as
their population expands, until such a time that large municipalities contract for curbside service. In order to
provide the access credit that is this District's only means of complying with the state plan, the drop-off
recycling program must be maintained.
3. Multi-material Drop-off Recycling Facilities

The companies and facilities providing recycling service to the residential/commercial sector in the reference
year are listed in Chapter III, Table III-5.
In Coshocton County, a full-service, urban drop-off location is operated by Skip’s Refuse Service at its business
location in Coshocton. Skip’s purchases aluminum cans and accepts colored and clear glass bottles and jars,
newsprint, corrugated cardboard, #1 and #2 plastic bottles, and steel cans. There are also several private
recycling companies that accept or buy scrap metal and other recyclables, but do not accept a broad enough
scope to contribute to the access goal.
In Fairfield County, a full-service, urban drop-off location is operated by Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action
Agency. The center purchases aluminum cans and accepts colored and clear glass bottles and jars, newsprint,
corrugated cardboard, #1 and #2 plastic bottles, and steel cans, batteries, used motor oil, office paper and
magazines. There are also several private recycling companies that accept or buy scrap metal and other
recyclables, but do not accept a broad enough scope to contribute to the access goal.
Also in Fairfield County, the village of Bremen converted their non-subscription curbside recycling program to a
full service rural drop-off in 2012, which is serviced by Big-O Refuse at the expense of the village. It is available
to all township residents as well as village residents.
In Licking County, there is a multi-material drop-off at SBC Recycling near Croton (Centerburg mailing address).
Denison University operates a recycling barn that accepts aluminum and steel cans, colored and clear glass
bottles and jars, aluminum pie plates and foil, newspaper, corrugated cardboard, office paper, mixed paper,
magazines, catalogs, and #1 and #2 plastic. The barn in Granville is available to the public twenty four hours a
day, seven days a week. There are also several private recycling companies that accept or buy scrap metal
and other recyclables, but do not accept a broad enough scope to contribute to the access goal.
In Perry County, the PerCo, Inc. recycling processing facility in New Lexington accepts aluminum cans, colored
and clear glass bottles and jars, newsprint, corrugated cardboard, #1 and #2 plastic bottles, and steel cans.
There are also several private recycling companies that accept or buy scrap metal and other recyclables, but
do not accept a broad enough scope to contribute to the access goal.
Responsible Entity: Private sector.

Area of benefit: Entire District, all sectors. The multi-material recycling centers contribute to access either as
an urban or rural full serve drop-off location.
Amount and type of materials recycled: In the reference year, three of these facilities also received and
processed material from the district funded drop-off collection program. They accepted the five targeted
materials.
Method of Measurement: The number of tons reported by SBC Recycling, PerCo, and Lancaster Fairfield
Community Action through annual surveys are adjusted to subtract the materials reported as collected through
the district funded drop-off collection program. These facilities also provide drive through service for the
general public, access for businesses and institutions, and industries. By cross checking their surveys against
those returned by municipalities, county managers, and industries, we are able to minimize the chance of
counting materials twice.
Program Review: These are not programs implemented by the district. They are businesses that currently
exist, and the District uses them to the maximum extent possible to increase and encourage recycling. The
biggest advantage is that there is someplace in each county that residents can take their materials with larger
capacity than the drop-off bins
The biggest weakness in private enterprise is that the district does not have any control over their operation or
continued existence. Reporting is voluntary on their part, and there is likely more recycling happening than is
being reported. It is anticipated that programs which are profitable to the private entity will continue and those
which are not profitable will cease to exist. Hours of operation are not round the clock, which make them less
convenient for residents.
4. Access to recycling opportunities for institutions and businesses:
A number of the waste haulers that provide waste collection services in the District also provide recycling
collection services for businesses and institutions, particularly for materials that are generated in significant
quantities like corrugated cardboard. They may collect materials that have a relatively high value like ferrous
and nonferrous metals or the companies may market the materials directly to processors. This accounts for
most of the tonnage reported under commercial/institutional and includes waste generating industries that are
outside the SIC codes defined as "Industrial" in the OEPA Format.
The major problem encountered by small businesses and institutions is that they often do not generate enough
of any specific recyclable to make collection cost effective, and they may not have the means to store and
transport materials to markets. If there is a service fee, the fee may exceed the savings realized from
decreased disposal. Most of these businesses are located in urban areas.
The District and the recycling offices in the counties provide several services which assist all institutions and
businesses to recycle.
A. Businesses and institutions may use the drop-off recycling locations that were discussed earlier in this
chapter. The businesses must separate and transport the material, but small businesses may find this
preferable to paying for special collection services. The Licking County Recycling Office has placed roll-off
containers at several of the drop-off locations that are in highly commercial areas to accommodate the large
amounts of corrugated cardboard brought to these sites. It is believed that this is at least partially due to the
participation of area businesses. Perry County has worked directly with several businesses that use the drop-
off bins to coordinate drop off and collection so bins do not become too full for residential use.
B. The AbiBow Recycling Paper Retriever bins in Fairfield and Licking Counties accept paper generated from
businesses. A number of the bins are in locations that are convenient to local businesses. Bins are located at
post offices, schools, churches and other businesses to accommodate both the general public and needs of
the businesses.
C. All four county recycling offices have collection routes that collect selected materials from public schools
and government agencies.
In Coshocton County, Coshocton County Recycling Office manages and operates an office paper
collection route for government offices and schools. A complete list is included in Table III-5. The
program is funded through the recycling contract between the District and Coshocton County. In the
reference year, this program collected 30 tons of material at a cost of approximately $9,753 ($324
per ton).
In Fairfield County, the Community Action Recycling Center manages and operates a collection route
that covers 40 county and municipal government offices, elementary and secondary schools, and
colleges and universities. The materials collected vary from site to site, but may include all of the
following; Aluminum and steel cans, glass bottles, corrugated cardboard, office and mixed paper, and
#1 and #2 plastic bottles. The program is funded through the contract between the District and
Fairfield County that is subcontracted to Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action Recycling Center. In
the reference year, this program collected 106 tons of material at a cost of approximately $25,435
($238 per ton).
The Licking County Recycling Office manages and operates recycling collection for government offices.
The materials collected include office/mixed paper, corrugated cardboard, and aluminum and PETE
beverage containers. The program is funded through the contract between the District and Licking
County. In the reference year, this program collected 40 tons of material at a cost of approximately
$6,276 ($156 per ton).
In Perry County, PerCo, Inc. and the Perry County Recycling Office provide recycling collection for
county and municipal government offices, and elementary and secondary schools. The materials
collected vary from site to site, but may include all of the following; Aluminum and steel cans, glass
bottles, corrugated cardboard, office and mixed paper, magazines and #1 and #2 plastic bottles. The
program is funded through the contract between the District and Perry County, with a portion of the
services subcontracted to PerCo, Inc.. In the reference year, this program collected 87 tons of
material at a cost of approximately $3,585 ($41 per ton).
Responsible entity: Individual businesses or institutions are primarily responsible for their own waste
reduction efforts. The District and/or the county recycling offices provide the information and services listed
above. Through contracts with the counties, the District is participating in funding the residential drop-off
program which also serves the institutions and businesses which choose to utilize the drop-off locations.
Area of benefit: government offices, schools, churches, commercial businesses, industries outside the defined
SIC codes for manufacturing.
Amount and type of materials reduced and recycled: The District encourages businesses to recycle any
materials for which there is demand. In this plan update, the five materials designated for commercial and
institutional recycling are corrugated cardboard, office paper, newspaper, aluminum beverage cans, and steel
cans. The amount recycled is listed in Table IV-6 as reported to the District and OEPA.
Method of Measurement: Quarterly reports for government/school collections, annual surveys for all others.
The amount attributed to this sector is the amount reported by private recyclers that is NOT already reported
elsewhere (curbside, drop-off, collection events). Information given to the OEPA by some recyclers is used if
annual surveys were not already available.
Program Review: Companies that directly segregate and market their own materials, or that segregate and
store materials for pickup by private haulers are the most cost-effective for the district, as they occur at no cost
to the District. The AbiBow Paper Retriever program is also very cost effective and provides additional recycling
capacity at drop-off sites at no cost to the District. They work well in Fairfield and Licking Counties, but the
company does not yet serve Coshocton or Perry Counties. AbiBow Recycling provides a financial incentive to
recycle more paper by paying the site host a nominal amount for large quantities of materials in their
container.
The greatest strength of the governmental recycling program is that public agencies lead by example.
Recycling within schools and government offices demonstrates that the public sector is accepting responsibility
for its purchasing habits just as we teach residents to be responsible for theirs. School recycling reinforces the
education message to students that everyone should recycle. Materials from schools and government offices
are often high quality and can bolster revenue for a collector.
The weakness of the governmental program is the cost of door-to-door pickup relative to the tons of materials
collected at many of the facilities. Education is offered to encourage higher material diversion, but it is
ultimately up to the facility staff to separate recyclables from trash and that is sometimes not a high priority to
them. Lack of storage space at individual offices necessitates frequent pickup versus waiting until loads would
be more cost efficient. Consolidating collection points, less frequent pickups, and better education would
improve the cost efficiency of this program. In total, this program collected 263 tons of material in the
reference year at a cost of $45,049 for a cost of $171 per ton.
5. Commercial and institutional waste reduction and recycling
Commercial Recycling: Business recycling is primarily the responsibility of the individual business. However,
the District and the county recycling offices assist businesses in several ways:
Education and Technical assistance:
A. The District is prepared to provide education and technical assistance including guidelines and
methodology for performing waste audits to help businesses identify alternatives to waste generation and
methods for the collection and marketing of recyclable materials. In the reference year there were seven
waste audits performed by Fairfield County staff. Private waste haulers routinely provide waste audits for new
and existing customers to assist them in segregating waste for recycling.
B. The District identifies and provides contact information on recycling service providers. This information is
available by telephone in response to specific inquiries, on the CFLP District’s web site and on the four county
recycling office web sites, and in print through county recycling brochures.
C. The District supports the materials marketing services (waste exchange) provided by a local for-profit
business and provides a link to their services on its website. In the reference year, the District provided
funding to the county recycling offices to hold workshops highlighting this service to their businesses and
industries, with Licking and Fairfield holding workshops in 2012. Past plans included support for OMEX, the
statewide waste exchange, but that service no longer exists.
D. The District offers assistance to local businesses in identifying and applying for grants to fund recycling and
waste minimization projects. However, there were no requests for this information in the reference year.
6. Recycling Collection by Private Waste Hauling Companies and (7). Private scrap yards,
brokers and end use industries
The private companies and facilities providing recycling service to the residential/commercial sector in the
reference year are listed in Chapter III, Table III-5. Private sector recycling companies and scrap yards pre-date
the District, especially those dealing with metals. They continue to accept materials brought to them by all
sectors, and may also provide pickup service. Because many buy materials, especially materials not included
in curbside or drop-off programs, they continue to operate profitably and fill a recycling need in communities.
Private waste haulers continue to increase their participation in recycling programs and are now providing
curbside service to communities, collection service to commercial customers, and individual collection to
residents via subscription. To achieve economy of scale in their capital investments, it is to their advantage to
maximize the number of customers in each geographical area they serve. They reported collecting 3,643 tons
of material in 2012, exclusive of curbside that was reported separately.
The District is served by a number of private industries using scrap to make products, which are located both
inside and out of the district. Most specialize in certain types of materials—metals, paper, or plastic.
In Fairfield County, Lancaster-Fairfield Community Action Recycling Center also provides commercial collection
to some area businesses that do not receive recycling service from their hauler (City of Lancaster). In the
reference year, this service was free to businesses and funded by the Recycling Center. It collected 373 tons
for an approximate cost of $10,373 ($27 per ton). In 2013, Community Action instituted a fee for this service
to cover the cost of operation and the number of participating businesses dropped in half, while the reported
collection remained at 336 tons. This would imply that the companies discontinuing the service were not the
companies with large amounts of recyclable material.
AbiBow Recycling's Paper Retriever program has been in place in Fairfield and Licking County since 2004.
Multiple locations in each county have green and yellow bins for office paper, newspaper, magazines, and mail,
including envelopes. Each site host (usually a school, a church, or a non-profit community organization) is paid
by AbiBow Recycling LLC for the paper collected. In Fairfield County, there are 43 locations. In Licking County,
there are 90 locations, many in conjunction with the county drop-off sites. The AbiBow Recycling Paper
Retriever program, although not multi-material, is a significant companion program to the county-wide drop-off
programs in Fairfield and Licking Counties. In 2012, 3,165 tons of paper was recycled through the AbiBow
Recycling program.
Responsible Entity: Private sector.
Area of benefit: Entire District, all sectors.
Amount and type of materials recycled: In the reference year, this sector diverted the majority of the
residential/commercial recycling tons. Materials varied by company, so even in combination, they cannot
contribute to the access goal. They are critical for reaching Goal #2, diverting waste from the landfill.
Method of Measurement: Annual surveys are sent to each private hauler and recycler in the district, and also
to out-of-district companies that are used by District entities. Many willingly return the surveys and directly
participate in tracking our recycling success. By cross checking their surveys against those returned by
municipalities, county managers, and industries, we are able to minimize the chance of counting materials
twice.
Program Review: These are not programs implemented by the district. They are businesses that currently
exist, and the District uses them to the maximum extent possible to increase and encourage recycling. The
biggest advantage to privatization is that the district does not bear the cost of their operation and they
successfully divert more materials than any other recycling program in the District. The AbiBow Recycling
Paper Retriever program is a significant asset to the overall recycling program in the District because of the
additional recycling capacity that the program provides and the recycling promotion that results from the
program at no cost to the District.
The biggest weakness in private enterprise is that the district does not have any control over their operation or
continued existence. Reporting is voluntary on their part, and there is likely more recycling happening than is
being reported. It is anticipated that programs which are profitable to the private entity will continue and those
which are not profitable will cease to exist.

Facilities that sort, process, and market the recyclables that are collected are a vital component of successful
recycling. While scrap yards provide these services for materials that are relatively homogeneous (like scrap
metals), commingled recyclables are usually taken to a material recovery facility where they are sorted and
processed for shipment to end users.
Private for-profit companies that collect recyclables in this District and take them to their own MRF include
Waste Management, Rumpke, Skip’s Recycling, SBC Recycling, and J&J Hauling. Not-for-profit organizations
operating MRFs include Community Action Recycling in Fairfield County and PerCo, Inc. in Perry County.
The District has provided funding and has assisted in facilitating state grant funding for buildings, and
expansions and improvements at both not-for-profit facilities, and has also worked with SBC Recycling to fund,
and facilitate the receipt of state grant funding for equipment to expand SBC’s processing capacity in Licking
County. Many years ago, District grants were used to purchase equipment to assist Skip's Recycling Center in
Coshocton County. The funding of each of these projects directly correlated with increased diversion of
materials from landfills.
In the reference year, Coshocton County paid $900 per year and Licking County paid nothing to take their
collected materials to SBC Recycling, but both incurred high transportation costs as a result of the facility being
in the far northwest corner of Licking County. Fairfield County paid $86,441 to have their materials processed
at the Community Action Recycling Center. Perry County paid $170,504 to have their collected materials
processed at PerCo, Inc.. Private haulers that did not own MRFs took their collected materials to a variety of
processing facilities at a cost they incorporated into their charge for services.
Program Review for material recovery facilities : The District does not own or operate material recovery
facilities, relying upon the private sector to provide sorting and processing services for materials collected
through the residential drop-off program. The District has invested heavily in the building, expansion, and
operation of the two non-profit processing centers within the District, providing reliable consistent access to
processing to Fairfield and Perry Counties regardless of market fluctuations. However, both facilities continue
to receive annual District payment for processing services in addition to retaining proceeds from the sale of
materials. SBC Recycling has provided processing services for the residential drop-off programs in Licking and
Coshocton Counties as contribution to the community, not because the activity was profitable. Facilities owned
by other private companies have historically been too far away to economically transport materials and have
not offered their processing services to the District free of charge. This also puts private haulers that would
like to offer curbside service to communities at a competitive disadvantage because the MRF owners control
the cost of processing the materials.
The change taking place currently is that more private haulers are interested in competing for the contracts to
collect and process residential recyclables in the District. By competitively bidding Licking County's residential
drop-off contract, the county reduced its overall cost of the program by more than half and may even see a
financial return for the value of the materials in the future. As this trend continues, member counties will have
more choices for providing cost-efficient recycling services to their residents. Private haulers will be faced with
the decision to either build their own processing centers, pay their competitors to process materials they
collect, haul recyclables long distances for processing, or lose contracts that include recycling.
It is impossible to quantify the effect of Material Recovery Facilities on the amount recycled, or measure a cost
per ton because these are private enterprises that do not share their cost of operation. A correlation between
distance and cost also cannot be made, as there are too many operational variables between facilities.
9. Yard Waste Composting

The yard waste composting facilities that accept yard waste from the district are listed in Chapter III, Table III-6.
The number of facilities accepting material from the general public was limited in the reference year. With the
closure of the Perry County facility in 2013, residents were forced to transport their materials to another
county, or deal with them on-site.
The District has provided financial assistance for the development or upgrading of composting facilities with
limited success. All but two have closed permanently.
At the present time, public education programs provided through the county recycling offices encourage
property owners to manage yard waste in their own yard by using mulching mowers and by backyard
composting.
Responsible entities: District and county recycling offices provide education and information about recycling
opportunities. Private sector provides compost facility operation.
Area of benefit: All sectors of the District population, with an emphasis on urban areas where on-site
composting is not practical.
Amount and type of materials recycled: In the reference year, this sector recycled 23,969 tons of material,
including grass, brush, food waste and storm debris. In 2012, our four counties were hit directly by a direcho
that downed trees and created widespread power outages resulting in a significant flood of debris that found
its way (over the course of many cleanup months) to compost facilities and landfills. This was a one-time
phenomenon that should not impact facilities or waste streams on a long-term basis, and a decrease back to
normal levels is factored into subsequent projections.
Method of measurement: Annual surveys are sent to all compost facilities. For non-respondents, we use OEPA
information from annual reports submitted by the facilities to the agency.
Program Review: The cost of operating a public yard waste compost operation is higher than the revenue
gained by the sale of mulch, and residents in our four counties do not use facilities that charge to bring yard
waste into the facility. Successful facilities have branched out into more lucrative areas that offset the yard
waste compost operations. Other publicly available compost facilities – both private and government – closed
for lack of ongoing profitability even though they received district funding for start up costs. The predominantly
rural nature of our counties makes it easier for residents to dispose of their yard waste on site rather than
loading it into a vehicle and taking it to a facility. The compost facilities are used more for large brush that
cannot be easily handled by residents, and by commercial tree trimming companies.
It is anticipated that compost facilities that can diversify enough to subsidize the acceptance of yard waste will
continue to exist and provide an outlet for yard waste material.
10. Residential waste reduction, recycling, reuse and composting information, education
and technical assistance:
Even before the CFLP Solid Waste Management District was formed, Recycling Offices in three of the counties
making up the District were actively involved in providing waste reduction and recycling education to county
residents. Utilizing financial assistance from the CFLP District, each of the four counties in the District have
active recycling offices providing waste reduction and recycling education to the public through a variety of
activities.
With the 2010 plan, the focus of education programs shifted from increasing awareness to increasing recycling
through targeted activities. Annual outreach plans target five audiences (residents, schools, business,
communities, and industries) with strategies to increase their participation in recycling. Strategies include
increasing communication with each sector, recognizing and rewarding results, increasing partnerships on
recycling events, and linking classroom education with real-world recycling.
In Coshocton County, the Recycling Office partners with American Electric Power to implement an Earth Day
activity at the Conesville Power Plant. The company hosts multiple teachers from local and state organizations
to conduct activities for local students in a day-long field trip. In 2012, the Recycling Office conducted a hands-
on activity called "Land Lasso" showing the value of green space and emphasizing the importance of recycling
by showing the slow process of biodegradation. By partnering with AEP, the teachers gained access to
students from every school district in the county in one day, and incorporated their individual lesson into a
group of inter-related lessons for a bigger educational impact. Tying this lesson to the multiple recycling
opportunities in Coshocton County links education to action, and the goal is to increase the number of families
with school age children that participate in the recycling programs.
Responsible entity: County Recycling Offices.
Area of benefit/audience: The general public, school age children, community leaders, businesses and
industries are all sectors that receive targeted education designed to increase participation in recycling
opportunities.
Amount and Type of Materials Reduced or Recycled: There is no definitive tonnage associated with this
activity. It is expected that annual increase in tonnages is at least in part due to local educational efforts.
Method of Measurement: At this time, county recycling offices must complete at least one activity targeted to
each audience as part of their outreach plan. The only direct measurement is the number of pounds collected
at special events.
Program Review: With the last plan update, the District prioritized the five target audiences to ensure that all
sectors are reached, and developed strategies to reach each audience. Those strategies are common to all
four counties to ensure that all counties are striving toward the same goals.
From that common point, each of the counties in the District creates an annual outreach and education plan,
which must include at least one strategy per audience, as well as maintaining a website, maintaining local
recycling information and speaker availability. The strength of having four county programs is the ability to
promote and use local resources to their best advantage, having staff located close to the audiences, and
maintaining a physical location for residents to visit. Tailoring each county outreach plan to the unique
circumstances in that county ensures greater message reception leading to behavior change.
The biggest weakness in the new focus has been measuring the impact of the individual activities on recycling
participation. It is easier to measure staff hours than behavioral changes that occur as a result of those hours.
11. Goal #5 - Develop strategies for managing tires, yard waste, lead-acid batteries,
household hazardous waste (HHW) and obsolete electronics.
A. Tires
In this District as in the rest of the state, most waste tires are left with tire dealers when new tires are installed.
However, people still seem to end up with tires for disposal. The District has been working aggressively to
reduce the number of illegal tire dumps. The dumps that are remaining are listed on Table III-8, Chapter III.
The Boards of Health in each of the four counties work to ensure compliance with the tire transportation,
storage and disposal regulations and to prevent new tire dumps from developing.
The District has been implementing the following waste tire management strategies:
Through the County Health Departments, monitor compliance with the requirements of Ohio’s tire
management regulations regarding the collection, transportation, storage, and disposal of tires. When funding
was available, the District supported the cleanup of tires on private property through local Health Departments
where a commitment was made to attach a lien on the property to recover the funds invested. Unfortunately,
no funds have been recovered from liens on tire dumps to-date.
Provide information to the public, particularly to individuals who may generate waste tires, regarding licensed
tire haulers and legal disposal options.
The District works with each of the counties to assure that there are on-going opportunities for residents to
dispose of tires. In 2012, two counties hosted at least one tire collection event. More ongoing privately-owned
recycling opportunities exist than in the last plan, giving residents year-round opportunities to safely,
economically and legally recycle their tires.
The District has financially supported litter collection programs on public property (roadways, parks, waterways)
to include the removal of illegally dumped tires.
B. Household Hazardous Waste Management (HHW)
Beginning in 1997, the District held annual household hazardous waste collection events. In the years 2007 -
2011, HHW collection events alternated between counties - two each year and latex paint was excluded from
collection to conserve funds for truly hazardous material for which there was no other disposal option. With
the continued decrease in public participation and increasing non-hazardous nature of the materials collected,
collection events were discontinued. In 2012, there were no HHW collection events in the District.
To address materials for which no disposal options existed, the District purchased pre-paid boxes for recycling
florescent light bulbs. The boxes were distributed to PerCo in Perry County, the District office in Licking County,
and the Coshocton County Health Department in Coshocton County, and they began accepting florescent light
bulbs from residents (no businesses). In Fairfield County, Menards retail store collects florescent light bulbs
from the public without the need for District assistance. In addition, the Health Departments in all four
counties began accepting mercury and mercury devices from the general public for recycling. Two privately
owned and operated HHW facilities (one in-district and one out-of-district) accept materials on an ongoing
basis from the general public at a charge. Sheriff Offices continue to collect ammunition and explosives from
residents throughout the year.
Household hazardous waste education has been incorporated into the ongoing marketing and outreach
programs in each of the four counties. The programs educate residents about the problems associated with
HHW disposal and encourage residents to find alternatives to using or disposing of products considered to be
hazardous. The intended audience for this HHW education program includes all ages from primary grades to
adults. Because this topic is infrequently requested by educators for classroom presentations, education staff
have worked to incorporate these messages into other topics.
C. Lead acid batteries
At the present time, the private enterprise system for collecting batteries seems to be working smoothly.
Virtually all area automotive supply stores and repair shops accept old batteries in exchange when new
batteries are purchased and some use a deposit system. Several area scrap recyclers buy batteries. The
District, through the county recycling offices, educates the public regarding the proper management of spent
lead acid batteries.
The District is estimating a 95% recycling rate for lead acid batteries. We believe that the public is well
educated about the need to carefully handle lead acid batteries and to keep them out of disposal systems.
While we feel the 95% figure is justified, the District has not been able to claim this recycling rate on district
annual reports due to the difficulty of surveying the large number of retail entities that would be required to
verify battery recycling.
D. Electronics and other “Hard to Dispose Items”:
The materials listed above--tires, lead acid batteries, HHW, and yard waste--are specifically addressed in the
State Solid Waste Management Plan because they are banned from landfills (tires, lead acid batteries, and
segregated yard waste ), or may increase the hazards of landfilling (HHW). In addition to these materials, there
are other materials that pose disposal problems. Appliances and electronic components are bulky and may
contain hazardous components. In the past the District has worked with the counties on various programs to
collect hard to dispose of items.
In 2012, one county held at least one appliance collection event. AEP continues its rebate system for old
refrigerators, which is promoted by the District and all four county education programs. Licking County's
Recycling Office collects electronics year round, as well as a private recycler that participates in local collection
events at no charge. Goodwill Industries in all four counties partner with Dell in their electronics recycling
program. The Licking County Computer Society holds annual collection events and refurbishes collected units
for recycling back into local use. Best Buy accepts electronics from the general public throughout the year. In
Chapter V of this Plan, the District will set priorities for programs to address these materials.
Program Review: For many years, residents were faced with owning the above-listed materials that their
hauler did not take, and for which there was no local disposal option. It was common to find these materials
dumped along roadways, and litter collection programs were instituted to remove them. The District initiated
special collection events, providing at least one opportunity each year for residents to dispose of stored
materials. The events were either free (HHW) or at a nominal fee (tires and appliances). However, they
continued to be found dumped along roadways and litter collection staff continue to remove them at a very
high cost.
As privately owned and operated businesses have incorporated the acceptance of these materials into their
operations, the necessity for collection events has diminished. There are now outlets for disposing of all the
above listed materials without the need for District involvement beyond educating residents that they exist.
However, their proximity to residents is not close enough in all four counties to ensure that they will be fully
utilized. It is still common to find tires along roadways, however the value of scrap metal has resulted in fewer
appliances being left unreclaimed.
For continued local collection events that increase the convenience for residents, fees are charged to cover the
cost of disposal. The requirement that participants cover the cost of the service through a fee reinforces that
consumers are responsible for the purchasing choices they make throughout the life cycle of the products. It
places the cost burden directly on those who use the service and does not spread it to residents who already
make use of private businesses to recycle or dispose. It also supports local private businesses that offer
material recycling at a cost by ensuring that public funds are not used to compete with the private sector.
Education is a high priority to raise the general awareness of available services and to change the mindset that
disposal is ever "free".
E. Yard Waste - see #9
F. Special recycling collections and litter cleanups
Each of the four counties have recycling offices which sponsor special recycling events which usually serve a
dual purpose of reducing waste and raising public awareness of recycling. The opportunities for which
recycling amounts were reported in 2012 include: Coshocton County held a special collection event for tires.
Fairfield County held several collection events for out-dated prescription drugs, electronics and confidential
documents. Perry County held the “Ultimate Recycling Days” which include appliances, tires, used motor oil,
car batteries and scrap metal. Both the Perry County Sheriff Office and the New Lexington Police Department
have installed containers for depositing pharmaceuticals year-round. Participation of schools in Recycle Mania
are included in special collections, although the goal of that program is to create ongoing recycling programs
within schools.
Additionally, materials collected along roadways by litter crews or volunteer groups that could be recycled
include tires and appliances and some scrap metals. Coshocton and Perry maintain year round litter programs
with a paid supervisor. Fairfield and Licking Counties assisted townships with the cost of disposal for materials
they collected periodically.
Responsible entity: In general, these special programs are organized and operated by each of the four county
recycling offices with funding through the counties’ outreach contracts with the District. There are also
prescription drug collection events sponsored by local law enforcement agencies and some local governments
have sponsored community document shredding events. The Licking County Computer Society holds periodic
collection events for electronics.
At events using District funds, a modest fee is charged to offset disposal costs, or donations are accepted. At
other events, fees may or may not be charged.
Area of benefit: Residents in communities where collection events or litter cleanups are held.
Amount and type of materials reduced and recycled: The materials that are collected vary from event to
event. While the majority of events address the "hard to handle" materials discussed in #11-14, they can also
be used as fundraisers for organizations, incentives to increase volumes (aluminum can contest), or to make
use of a unique opportunity for partnerships with other organizations. Litter cleanups are ongoing throughout
the year, and materials are recycled versus landfilled whenever possible. In 2012, 88 tons of material was
reported as having been collected through special events and litter cleanups. The disposal cost for the
collection events was borne by participants or event sponsors. The cost to the District for litter cleanup in the
reference year was $51,800 which covered salary/fringes for crew supervisors, vehicle expenses, and disposal
of materials collected.
Method of Measurement: Event holders report the pounds collected at each event and through litter pickup,
either through quarterly contractual reports or annual surveys. Events sponsored by the county recycling
offices also track number of participants.
Program Review: The greatest strength of collection events is their high profile and resident satisfaction. It is
a tangible provision of service that residents want – whether they use it or not. It is a service that communities
and organizations can implement on their own initiative when and where there is a need. These events are an
integral part of the education program targeted to residents, as it reaches a large group in one day, and or a
week in the case of collections held at county fairs, and even longer for Recycle Mania. Litter cleanups are
also high profile and especially in the events where community volunteers are used, give residents a direct
opportunity to participate in improving their environment.
The greatest weakness of these events is that a very low percentage of the population makes use of them and
they contribute very little to the diversion of materials from landfills. It is anticipated that these special
collections will continue to evolve - diminishing for some materials, growing for others, but continue to play a
role in education.
12. Financial incentives:

The State Solid Waste Management Plan requires that SWMDs have in place or evaluate the feasibility of
providing financial incentives to increase participation in the recycling programs which are used to
demonstrate access to recycling.
Since virtually all of the waste collection in the District is accomplished by private haulers, some by contracts
with local governments, most by subscription, the District has no direct control of or authority to mandate
financial incentives related to residential waste collection. The District is prepared to provide information and
technical assistance to municipalities, townships or private haulers who voluntarily initiate studies or
implement alternate fee structures like volume based rates.
Program Review: Providing around-the-clock recycling access through drop-off sites at no charge to residents
gives each person the ability to reduce the trash they dispose through waste haulers. It can be a direct
financial incentive for residents who live where curbside recycling is offered by waste haulers at an additional
charge. This is a double-edged sword however, as it can reduce participation in curbside programs and make
them less cost efficient for the hauler providing the service.
There are built-in incentives for community leaders to franchise waste hauling and curbside recycling because
they can receive free services for the city in exchange for exclusivity. As mentioned before, one city discussed
the possibility of using a trash contract to raise revenue through their billing system to residents. The district is
supportive of franchising where it has been chosen by the community.
Fairfield County’s Community Action Agency runs two aluminum can contests each year for the general public,
with a cash prize to the person recycling the most cans in a set period of time. Their goal is to increase the
amounts of all materials brought in through the increased publicity. In addition, recycling centers that buy
materials give residents a financial incentive to recycle those materials.
AbiBow Recycling provides a financial incentive to hosts of their Paper Retriever bins directly related to the
amount of paper products recycled. This is a very popular program for the schools and churches participating.
The program has resulted in a significant diversion of paper waste from landfills.
It is not possible to quantify the effect of financial incentives on tonnage recycled.
13. Market development

The District understands that strong markets pull recyclables through the system. Without markets, recycling
collection efforts are futile. Therefore, the District has been actively engaged in promoting market growth
using the following strategies:
The Solid Waste District purchases and uses recycled content products whenever suitable products are
available at competitive prices. The District encourages county agencies, local governments and private
businesses to “buy recycled" and will assist in researching sources of recycled-content items upon request.
All four county recycling offices include “buy-recycled” in the school education and public education programs.
“Buy recycled” is integrated into business and industry waste reduction and recycling technical assistance
services and education materials whenever appropriate.
The District has financially supported the purchase of recycled content items in locations of general public use,
such as playground equipment, benches, and tables. The purpose of this program was to demonstrate that
recycled content products perform as well as, or better than, their virgin-content counterparts, and to
encourage local governments to continue the practice of “buying recycled” beyond the financially supported
demonstration project.
Program Review: Currently, funding assistance is available from the district for two market development
strategies. The first is manufacturing new products from recycled materials. Most companies receiving
financial assistance for this strategy in past years failed and the investments were lost. Funding criteria has
been tightened to minimize the district’s financial risk for these ventures and requests for assistance have
stopped.
The second strategy is to demonstrate that recycled content items are comparable in quality to those made of
virgin content. To date, the district has spent more than $890,000 purchasing recycled content products for
public use, including playgrounds, benches, tables, and a variety of other items. This can be considered
successful by looking at the number of recycled content items purchased by communities without district
assistance. The weakness in this strategy is that some applicants view this simply as a means of receiving free
items from the District that are already used widely (hence no demonstration value) with no further obligation
to independently purchase recycled content items.
Industrial Sector Implementation of Goals:
Goals #1, #3, and #4
All industries are surveyed annually to compile recycling data for the District. Table IV-7 lists all of the reported
industrial recycling in the reference year. If an industry does not respond, their most recent data is used if they
are still active. As in the table for residential/commercial recycling, double counting was minimized by asking
industries who they sent their materials to, so that survey totals from those entities could be adjusted
accordingly.
Although waste reduction programs are being implemented by many industries in the District as part of over-all
programs to be efficient and competitive, no specific quantities were reported on the surveys.
Industry waste reduction and recycling programs vary depending on the type and size of the industry, the waste
stream it generates, and the availability of haulers and recyclers to assist the industry in the collection and
marketing of the materials.
Responsible entity: Individual industries. The District provides the following:
a. The District, county recycling offices and private waste haulers provide education and technical
assistance including guidelines and methodology for performing waste audits to help industrial waste
generators identify alternatives to waste generation and methods for the collection and marketing of
recyclable materials. In general, it appears that most manufacturers are very comfortable with their ability
to independently implement waste reduction and recycling programs, however Fairfield County performed
seven waste audits in the reference year, and private haulers perform waste audits for new and existing
customers throughout the year.
b. The District and county recycling offices identify and provide contact information on recycling service
providers.
c. The District and county recycling offices promote a local waste exchange run by UST Environmental, Inc. in
Fairfield County.
d. The District has assisted industries in identifying and applying for grants to fund recycling and waste
minimization improvements. However, in the reference year, there were no requests for this type of
assistance.
Area of benefit: The majority of the benefit goes to the individual industry because waste reduction and
recycling programs usually result in reduced operating costs. The District benefits from decreased reliance
upon landfills for handling of waste materials. When local processors are used, increased industrial recycling
supports the local economy.
Program Review: Industries in the District comfortably assume their role in initiating recycling programs
because it contributes tangibly to the financial success of their companies. They rarely seek or require District
assistance, although it is available if needed. While most industries share a few waste streams in common,
such as corrugated cardboard, wood pallets, and paper, the largest wastes are unique and often resistant to
recycling. They have achieved a high diversion rate at no cost to the District.
Appendix H
Solid Waste Tonnage on

Which District Fees
Were Paid
2007-2013
TONS UPON WHICH FEES WERE COLLECTED
DISPOSAL FEE TONS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Total Landfill Receipts

In‐district tons 415,537 404,051 354,942 374,523 365,365 317,070 309,252
out‐of‐district tons 440,233 446,264 330,659 249,469 144,142 165,996 168,325
out‐of‐state tons 48,783 58,013 33,625 129,706 415,106 507,725 278,914
Total 904,553 908,328 719,226 753,698 924,614 990,791 756,491
Suburban South
In‐district tons 238,893 193,609 157,084 151,201 121,628 101,574 96,923
out‐of‐state tons 32,931 27,792 1,380 690 1,073 2,072 1,059
Total 614,745 571,352 395,857 277,686 177,169 149,385 148,808
Pine Grove
In‐district tons 90,131 111,106 111,106 100,814 101,898 85,131 75,631
out‐of‐state tons 2,327 1,170 2,462 4,066 3,886 1,960 5,692
Total 178,924 197,372 194,275 215,573 164,892 167,101 142,523
Coshocton Landfill
In‐district tons 59,496 68,830 59,067 68,154 74,265 33,741 27,894
out‐of‐state tons ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Total 68,972 77,998 67,092 74,809 81,586 40,384 32,748
Tunnell Hill Landfill

In‐district tons 27,017 30,506 27,685 54,354 67,574 96,625 108,804
out‐of‐state tons 13,525 29,051 29,783 124,951 410,147 503,693 272,163
Total 41,912 61,606 62,002 185,631 500,967 633,921 432,412
GENERATION FEE TONS 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
In‐district disposed tons 415,537 401,970 354,941 374,523 365,365 317,096 308,536
Out‐of‐district disposed tons 52,071 55,001 49,796 50,885 56,011 68,491 78,443
Total 467,608 456,971 404,737 425,408 421,376 385,587 386,979
Appendix I
Existing District Rules

and
Review of the Role of Rules
In Implementing the
District Plan
CFLP Solid Waste Management Plan Update 2014 Appendix I
Role of District Rules in Implementing the District Solid Waste Management Plan
PUBLIC NOTICE
ORC Section 121.22 requires all public officials to take official action and to conduct all deliberations
upon official business only in open meetings, unless the subject matter is specifically exempted by
law, and sets forth notice requirments. This rule provides clear direction as the methods that the
District will use to provide adequate notice.
Rule CFLP 1.0
PUBLIC NOTICE
All committees of the CFLP Solid Waste District will cause public notice to be given of all meetings of
the full committee and of any subcommittees or committees of the full Board of Directors through
mailing or faxing (if time is too short for mailing) copies of meeting agendas or notices to all news
media and individuals that have requested notification, consistent with Section 121.22 ORC. In
addition, notice will be given to at least one newspaper of general circulation in each county and the
administrative offices of each county for posting, so that the public may determine where and when
meetings will be held, and the general subject mater of each.

Approved Complete Plan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Approved Complete Plan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Approved Complete Plan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry

Planning Period 2015 to 2024

March 31, 2015

Coshocton-Fairfield-Licking-Perry Solid Waste District Plan Update

II. Executive Summary II-1

III. Inventories III-1

V. Planning Period Projections and Strategies V-1

VI. Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used VI-1

VII. Measurement of Progress Towards Waste Reduction Goals VII-1

VIII. Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation VIII-1

IX. District Rules IX-1

Appendix A District Formation Agreement

II. Executive Summary

IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction

V. Planning Period Projections and Strategies

VI. Methods of Management: Facilities and Programs to be Used

VII. Measurement of Progress Toward Waste Reduction Goals

VIII. Cost and Financing of Plan Implementation

Table VIII-3 Summary of Revenue Generated and Mechanisms Used VIII-4

1. Under the approved Plan:

The date of Ohio EPA approval was July 26, 2010.

2. Plan to be implemented with the approval of this document:

B. Reason for Plan Submittal

This plan is the mandatory five-year plan update.

C. Process to Determine Material Change in Circumstances

2. Procedure and timetable to address a material change.

D. District Formation and Certification Statement

this plan will be placed in Appendix B.

3. Certification and adoption statements:

E. CFLP District Policy Committee Members

Coshocton County Representatives

County Government Representative Gary Fischer, Coshocton County Commissioner

Municipal Government Representative Mark Frank, City of Coshocton

Township Representative Curtis Lee, Township Trustee

Health Department Representative Steve Lonsinger, Coshocton County Environmental Director

Industrial Representative Joe Bulzan, Rock Tenn CP, LLC

Citizen Representative Glenn Hill

Fairfield County Representatives

County Government Representative Mike Kiger, Fairfield County Commissioner

Municipal Government Representative Paul Martin, City of Lancaster

Township Representative Terry Dunlap, Township Trustee

Industrial Representative Tony Furgiuele, U.S.T. Environmental Contractor, Inc.

Citizen Representative Patty Bratton, Lancaster/Fairfield County Community Action

Public Representative Tony Vogel, Fairfield County Sanitary Engineer

Licking County Representatives

County Government Representative Tim Bubb, Licking County Commissioner

Municipal Government Representative Jeff Hall, City of Newark

Township Representative Dave Lang, Township Trustee

Industrial Representative Robin Bennett, Owens-Corning, Inc.

Citizen Representative Lynn Hatfield, SBC Recycling

Public Representative Seth Ellington, Waste Away

Perry County Representatives

County Government Representative Jim O'Brien, Perry County Commissioner

Municipal Government Representative Scott Bryant, City of New Lexington

Township Representative Richard Fankhauser, Township Trustee

Health Department Representative Angela DeRolph, Perry County Health Commissioner

Industrial Representative Howard Orringer, Cooper Standard

Citizen representative Lucinda Yinger, T.C.C.I. Labs