1

How does language processing differ between monolingual and bilingual individuals?

Student Name

Course

Professor

Institution

Submission Date
 2

How does language processing differ between monolingual and bilingual individuals?

Chapter One: 1.0 Introduction

Language processing is one of the most important aspects of communication and the

ability to comprehend and understand language is dependent on many factors. While the majority

of the population is monolingual, an increasing number of individuals are multilingual (Bice &

Kroll, 2021). This research will seek to understand the differences in how language is processed

by monolingual and bilingual individuals, and the impact that this has on communication.

1.1 Background

Language is one of the most important aspects of communication and is one of the most

important skills that an individual can possess. It is a fundamental part of being able to interact

with people and understanding the world around them (Bice & Kroll, 2021). It involves the

ability to comprehend and understand written and spoken language. Monolingual and bilingual

individuals have different language processing abilities, as they have different levels of

experience with language (Kroll et al., 2021). The ability to process language is an essential part

of human cognition, and it is influenced by many factors such as the individual’s native

language, age, educational background, and cultural context.

One of the most interesting and important questions regarding language processing is

how it differs between monolingual and bilingual individuals. Monolingual individuals are those

who primarily speak one language, while bilingual individuals are those who are proficient in

two or more languages. Research has shown that bilingualism has a range of cognitive benefits,

including improved executive function and enhanced cognitive flexibility (Bice & Kroll, 2021).
 3

It is therefore of interest to investigate how language processing differs between monolingual

and bilingual individuals.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

The aim of this research proposal is to investigate how language processing differs

between monolingual and bilingual individuals. This research will focus on the differences in

language processing abilities between these two groups and how they impact language

comprehension and understanding.

1.3 Rationale/ Justification/ Significance of the study

This research is important for several reasons. First, it will provide valuable insight into

how different language processing abilities impact language comprehension and understanding.

Additionally, it will provide valuable information for educators and other professionals who

work with individuals who are either monolingual or bilingual. This research will also provide

information that can be used to inform language teaching methods and language teaching

materials.

1.4 Objectives

1. To investigate how language processing differs between monolingual and bilingual

individuals.

1.5 Research Question

1. How does language processing differ between monolingual and bilingual individuals?

1.6 Hypothesis

H0: There is no connection between language processing abilities in both monolinguals and

bilinguals in language comprehension.

 4

H1: Monolingual and bilingual individuals will have different language processing abilities,

which will impact their language comprehension and understanding.

Chapter Two: 2.0 Literature Review

2.1 History of Language Processing

Language processing is a complex and multifaceted topic that has been studied

extensively in both monolingual and bilingual individuals. Studies have typically focused on the

cognitive differences between the two groups, such as differences in attention, working memory,

and executive function (Bice & Kroll, 2021). In particular, studies have been conducted to

examine the impact of bilingualism on language processing, and the findings have been highly

informative.

Studies have revealed that bilingual individuals tend to be more proficient than

monolingual individuals in language processing tasks. For example, a study by Salig et al. (2021)

found that bilinguals are better at recognizing and producing words in a second language than

monolinguals, as well as better at switching between languages. Furthermore, bilinguals have

been found to have better cognitive control and are better able to inhibit or suppress irrelevant

information (Bialystok & Craik, 2022). It has also been suggested that the bilingual advantage

may stem from the ability to switch between languages and to draw on the two language systems

when performing tasks.

2.2 Language Processing

Studies examining bilingual individuals have also found differences in the way that the

two languages are processed. For example, study by Bice and Kroll (2021) have found that

bilinguals are better able to access lexical information when producing a second language than
 5

monolinguals. Bilinguals have also been found to be better able to switch between languages and

to draw on the two language systems when performing tasks (Bialystok & Craik, 2022). Finally,

bilinguals have been found to have better executive function than monolinguals, which may

contribute to their better language processing abilities.

Overall, research examining the differences between monolingual and bilingual language

processing has been highly informative. Studies have consistently found that bilinguals are more

proficient than monolinguals in language processing tasks (Salig et al., 2021). Furthermore,

research has revealed that bilinguals are better able to access lexical information, switch between

languages, and draw on the two language systems when performing tasks (Bialystok & Craik,

2022). Finally, research has also suggested that the bilingual advantage may stem from the

ability to switch between languages and to draw on the two language systems when performing

tasks. Language processing is an area of study that has been widely researched in the context of

both monolingual and bilingual individuals (Navarro et al., 2022). While language processing

strategies used by monolingual and bilingual individuals may differ, research has shown that

both types of individuals have similar language processing capabilities.

2.3 Lexical Processing

The majority of research into language processing between monolingual and bilingual

individuals has focused on lexical processing, language comprehension, and language

production. The study by Bialystok and Craik (2022) found that bilinguals may be better able to

recognize certain words, but monolinguals can accurately comprehend more complex sentences

(Navarro et al., 2022). Additionally, bilinguals may have an advantage in terms of language

production, as they are more likely to use a variety of strategies to communicate.

 6

In terms of lexical processing, research has found that bilinguals may be better able to

recognize words in their native language, as well as in their second language. This is due to their

ability to draw on linguistic knowledge from both languages. Additionally, research has shown

that bilinguals are better able to recognize words from their non-native language, when compared

to monolinguals. Study by Salig et al. (2021) has also shown that bilinguals may be better able to

comprehend language than monolinguals. Bilinguals may be better able to recognize the

meaning of a sentence, even if the sentence contains words from both languages (Navarro et al.,

2022). Additionally, bilinguals are better able to comprehend complex sentences, and can better

recognize the meaning of unfamiliar words.

Research by Altarriba and Basnight-Brown (2022) has found that bilinguals are better

able to use language production strategies. Bilinguals may be more proficient in using various

strategies to communicate, such as code-switching, which involves switching between languages

in order to convey a message. This suggests that bilinguals may be better able to communicate

on a more complex level than monolinguals (Salig et al., 2021). Overall, research has shown that

language processing strategies used by monolingual and bilingual individuals may differ, and

that bilinguals may have an advantage in certain areas (Navarro et al., 2022). However, both

monolinguals and bilinguals are capable of highly accurate language processing, suggesting that

both types of individuals may be equally capable of understanding and producing language.

Several studies have been conducted to investigate the differences in lexical processing

between monolinguals and bilinguals. One such study was conducted by Navarro et al. (2022)

which examined the effects of bilingualism on lexical access. They found that bilinguals had

faster lexical access than monolinguals and that this was due to their increased experience with

language (Altarriba & Basnight-Brown, 2022). Specifically, bilinguals had more efficient
 7

retrieval strategies, which allowed them to access words more quickly, while monolinguals took

longer to access words (Salig et al., 2021). Furthermore, bilinguals demonstrated greater

flexibility in their lexical processing, allowing them to access words in a variety of contexts.

Another study by Rothman et al. (2022) investigated how the language proficiency of

bilinguals impacted their lexical processing. They found that bilinguals with higher language

proficiency had faster lexical access than those with lower language proficiency (Altarriba &

Basnight-Brown, 2022). Furthermore, they found that bilinguals with higher proficiency were

better able to recognize words in contexts outside their primary language, suggesting that

language proficiency influences lexical processing.

In addition, a study by Blanco-Elorrieta and Caramazza (2021) examined how the context

in which words were presented affected lexical processing in both monolinguals and bilinguals.

They found that monolinguals were more likely to recognize words when they were presented in

a single language context, while bilinguals were more likely to recognize words when they were

presented in multiple language contexts (Rothman et al., 2022). This suggests that bilinguals are

better able to access words in multiple contexts, allowing them to recognize words more quickly.

Overall, the literature review of lexical processing in both monolinguals and bilinguals

reveals that bilinguals have faster lexical access than monolinguals. Furthermore, language

proficiency and context have a significant impact on lexical processing in both monolinguals and

bilinguals (Rothman et al., 2022). These findings suggest that bilinguals have increased

experience with language and more efficient retrieval strategies, allowing them to access words

more quickly than monolinguals.

 8

2.4 Factors Affecting Language Processing

Language processing, the ability to understand and generate language, is a complex

process that is affected by a variety of factors. One of the most prominent differences in

language processing comes from whether the individual is monolingual or bilingual (Rothman et

al., 2022). Monolingual individuals are limited to one language, whereas bilingual individuals

have the capacity to process multiple languages. This distinction has a large impact on how

language is processed, and it is important to understand the differences between the two.

2.4.1 Phonological Processing

Research by Salig et al. (2021) has demonstrated that monolingual individuals tend to

rely heavily on phonological processing, or the ability to recognize and manipulate the sound

structure of language. This is due to the fact that their only language source is the one they are

immersed in, so they must rely on recognizing the sound structure of words in order to

understand them (Altarriba & Basnight-Brown, 2022). On the other hand, bilingual individuals

can utilize both phonological and semantic processing, as they have two language sources to

draw from (Rothman et al., 2022). This allows them to access a wider range of language

resources, and thus can more easily comprehend a variety of language structures.

Furthermore, their research indicated that bilingual individuals tend to be better at

processing language in a more abstract manner than monolingual individuals. This is likely due

to their experience with multiple languages, as they have likely encountered a variety of

language structures and contexts (Salig et al., (2021); Rothman et al., (2022); Castro et al.,

(2022)). This allows them to more easily understand complex language structures and

comprehend subtle nuances. In contrast, monolingual individuals tend to be more focused on

literal meanings and are less likely to understand the abstract or figurative aspects of language.
 9

2.4.2 Language Production

In terms of language production, research has also shown that bilingual individuals tend

to have an advantage over monolingual individuals. Bilingual individuals are able to draw on

multiple language sources, which allows them to access more words and phrases more quickly

(Rothman et al., 2022). This makes it easier for them to produce language more quickly and

accurately. In contrast, monolingual individuals may struggle to find the appropriate words or

phrases, as they are limited to the resources of their one language.

Language production is an important area of research in both monolinguals and

bilinguals. It has been studied for many years by researchers from a variety of disciplines,

including linguistics, psychology, and education (Salig et al., 2021). The results of studies on

language production in monolinguals have indicated that there are differences in the way in

which language is produced among different speakers (Rothman et al., 2022). For instance, some

studies have demonstrated that monolingual speakers produce more accurate and varied language

when speaking to a native speaker of the language than when speaking to a non-native speaker

(Rothman et al., 2022). Other studies have shown that language production in monolinguals is

influenced by factors such as the speaker's gender, age, and dialect.

Studies on language production in bilinguals have revealed that there are differences in

the way in which language is produced among bilinguals. For example, some study done by Li et

al. (2021) has demonstrated that bilinguals are better able to switch between languages when

speaking to a native speaker of one language, than when speaking to a native speaker of the other

language (Rothman et al., 2022). Other studies have indicated that bilinguals are better able to

use both languages simultaneously when communicating with a native speaker of the same

language.
 10

The study by Salig et al. (2021) on language production in both monolinguals and

bilinguals has provided a great deal of insight into how language is produced in different

individuals. The studies have demonstrated that there are differences in language production

among different speakers, and that these differences can be influenced by various factors

(Rothman et al., 2022). Furthermore, the research has indicated that bilinguals are better able to

switch between languages when speaking to a native speaker of one language, than when

speaking to a native speaker of the other language (Li et al., 2021). The methodologies and

research designs used in these studies have varied, but have generally been successful in

providing useful information about language production in both monolinguals and bilinguals.

Overall, research has demonstrated that there are clear differences in language processing

between monolingual and bilingual individuals. Monolingual individuals tend to rely primarily

on phonological processing and are less adept at processing language in an abstract manner

(Rothman et al., 2022). Bilingual individuals, on the other hand, are able to draw on multiple

language sources, which allows them to access a wider range of language resources and process

language in a more abstract manner (Li et al., 2021). Furthermore, bilingual individuals are also

better at producing language, as they can access more words and phrases more quickly. It is clear

that the distinction between monolingual and bilingual individuals has a profound effect on

language processing, and an understanding of this distinction is essential for understanding the

complexities of language processing.

2.5 Syntactic Processing

One area of language processing that has been studied is syntactic processing. It has been

found that bilinguals tend to exhibit greater syntactic flexibility than monolinguals do (Li et al.,

2021). This is due to their increased exposure to different languages and linguistic structures. For
 11

instance, bilinguals may use a more complex syntax when speaking a language, using verb tenses

and other grammatical devices to express meaning. On the other hand, monolinguals may rely on

simpler syntactic structures and less complex grammar (Rothman et al., 2022). Syntactic

processing is an important component of language comprehension and production, and research

on this topic has been conducted both in monolinguals and bilinguals.

One study, conducted by Li et al. (2021), investigated the syntactic processing of

bilinguals by comparing the performance of Chinese-English bilinguals and French-English

bilinguals on sentence comprehension and production tasks. The researchers found that the

bilinguals showed similar performance on the comprehension task, suggesting that the two

languages had similar processing requirements (Beatty-Martínez et al., 2021). However, on the

sentence production task, the bilinguals showed different performance depending on which

language was tested (Bice & Kroll, 2021). The Chinese-English bilinguals performed better on

the English production task than the French-English bilinguals, suggesting that their native

language had a greater influence on their syntactic processing.

Other research has looked at the differences in syntactic processing between

monolinguals and bilinguals. For example, in a study by Tiv et al. (2021), the authors found that

bilinguals were better at processing syntactically complex sentences than monolinguals. They

suggested that this was due to the increased cognitive demands that bilinguals face when

processing two languages simultaneously.

In addition, a study by Beatty-Martínez (2021) examined the effects of a bilingual's

native language on syntactic processing. The author found that bilinguals had better performance

on certain syntactic tasks when their native language was tested, compared to when their second

language was tested. This suggests that a bilingual's native language has a greater influence on
 12

their syntactic processing (McMurray et al., 2022). Overall, research has shown that there are

differences in syntactic processing between monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilinguals may have an

advantage on certain syntactic tasks due to the increased cognitive demands of processing two

languages simultaneously. Furthermore, a bilingual's native language may have a greater

influence on their syntactic processing than their second language (Bice & Kroll, 2021). More

research is needed to further explore the differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in

terms of syntactic processing.

2.6 Semantic Processing

Another area of language processing that has been studied is semantic processing. It has

been found that bilinguals tend to exhibit superior semantic processing skills compared to

monolinguals (Kroll et al., 2021). This is likely due to their increased exposure to different

languages and the ability to draw on multiple linguistic resources when making semantic

decisions (Tosun & Filipović, 2022). For instance, bilinguals can better identify synonyms and

antonyms, draw on multiple sources of semantic information, and use more nuanced language

when expressing meaning. The study of semantic processing in both monolinguals and bilinguals

has been an area of great interest to researchers in recent years (Bice & Kroll, 2021). This

literature review provides an overview of recent studies examining semantic processing in both

monolinguals and bilinguals, as well as the methodological approaches used and the main

findings of these studies.

In one study by Beatty-Martínez et al. (2021) researchers investigated semantic

processing in bilinguals using a priming task. The task was designed to measure the speed of

retrieval of target words in response to primed words. The results showed that bilinguals

responded faster to priming words in their second language than in their first language,
 13

indicating that bilinguals have better semantic processing in their second language than their first

language.

The study by McMurray et al. (2022) investigated semantic processing in bilinguals using

a lexical decision task. The task was designed to measure the speed of responding to target

words. The results showed that bilinguals responded faster to target words in their second

language than in their first language, suggesting that bilinguals have better semantic processing

in their second language than their first language. In a study by Tosun and Filipović (2022) the

researchers used eye-tracking to investigate semantic processing in bilinguals. The task was

designed to measure the amount of time spent looking at target words (Blanco-Elorrieta &

Caramazza, 2021). The results showed that bilinguals spent more time looking at target words in

their second language than in their first language, indicating that bilinguals have better semantic

processing in their second language than their first language.

Finally, researcher done by Kroll et al. (2021) used functional magnetic resonance

imaging (fMRI) to investigate semantic processing in monolinguals. The task was designed to

measure brain activity in response to target words (McMurray et al., 2022). The results showed

that monolinguals had increased brain activity in response to target words, suggesting that

monolinguals have better semantic processing than bilinguals (Tosun & Filipović, 2022).

Overall, the findings of these studies suggest that both monolinguals and bilinguals have better

semantic processing in their second language than in their first language (Kroll et al., 2021). The

methodological approaches used in these studies, such as priming, lexical decision, eye tracking,

and fMRI, allowed researchers to measure semantic processing in both monolinguals and

bilinguals (Rothman et al., 2022). The results of the studies indicate that bilinguals have better
 14

semantic processing in their second language than in their first language, whereas monolinguals

have better semantic processing than bilinguals.

Chapter Three: 3.0 Methodology

3.1 Procedure

To examine how language processing differs between monolingual and bilingual

individuals, this research proposal will use a combination of methods. These include a survey of

existing literature, and online questionnaires with monolingual and bilingual speakers of a

particular language. The survey of existing literature will involve a review of relevant academic

studies, as well as a review of popular sources such as books and magazine articles. This will

provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research in this area. The online

questionnaires will be conducted with both monolingual and bilingual individuals who are native

speakers of a particular language. These questionnaires will focus on the individual’s experience

of language processing, and will be designed to elicit detailed responses. The online

questionnaires will also test and measure language processing and assess the individual’s ability

to process language, such as their ability to understand and produce language. These tests will be

administered to both monolingual and bilingual individuals, and the results will be compared to

examine any differences in language processing.

3.2 Research Design

This research project will use a combination of online questionnaires and survey

literature to analyze the differences in language processing between monolingual and bilingual

individuals. The online questionnaires will be used to collect answers to questions that are

specific to the topic, such as how they process language, the types of languages they know and

use, and any differences in their language processing. The survey literature will be used to
 15

analyze the data collected from the online questionnaires and to determine any patterns in

language processing between monolingual and bilingual individuals.

3.3 Participants

The participants for this research project will include both monolingual and bilingual

individuals. The monolingual participants will be required to speak only one language, while the

bilingual participants will be required to speak two or more languages. The ages of the

participants for this research project will range from 18 to 65, and the participants will be drawn

from a variety of countries and cultures.

3.4 Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations for this study include obtaining informed consent from all of the

participants, maintaining confidentiality, and providing a safe and comfortable environment for

the participants.

3.5 Data Analysis

The data collected from the survey of existing literature, online questionnaires will be

analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative data from the online

questionnaires and literature review will be analyzed using thematic analysis. This will allow for

the identification of any patterns or themes which emerge from the data, which can then be used

to understand the differences in language processing between monolingual and bilingual

individuals.
 16

4.0 Project Timeline

Activities Start Date End Date Duration in Days

Prepare for study, and obtain informed consent 6-Dec 13-Dec 7
Conduct surveys of literature 14-Dec 21-Dec 7
Conduct online questionnaires 22-Dec 29-Dec 7
Analyze data and write up results 1-Jan-23 24-Jan-23 14
Submit research proposal and report results. 25-Jan-23 30-Jan-23 7

4. 2 Gantt Chart

c ec Dec n n n
eb
- De 6-D - Ja - Ja - Ja F
6 1 26 5- 15 25 4-

Prepare for study, and obtain informed consent

Conduct surveys of literature

Conduct online questionnaires

Analyze data and write up results

Submit research proposal and report results.

 17

References

Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. (2022). The psychology of communication: The interplay

between language and culture through time. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 53(7-

8), 860-874.

Beatty-Martínez, A. L., Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E., & Dussias, P. E. (2021). Phasic pupillary

responses reveal differential engagement of attentional control in bilingual spoken

language processing. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-12.

Bialystok, E., & Craik, F. I. (2022). How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention

to the mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1-24.

Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2021). Grammatical processing in two languages: How individual

differences in language experience and cognitive abilities shape comprehension in

heritage bilinguals. Journal of neurolinguistics, 58, 100963.

Blanco-Elorrieta, E., & Caramazza, A. (2021). On the Need for Theoretically Guided

Approaches to Possible Bilingual Advantages: An Evaluation of the Potential Loci in the

Language and Executive Control Systems. Neurobiology of Language, 2(4), 452-463.

Castro, S., Wodniecka, Z., & Timmer, K. (2022). Am I truly monolingual? Exploring foreign

language experiences in monolinguals. PloS one, 17(3), e0265563.

Kroll, J. F., Tabori, A. T., & Navarro-Torres, C. (2021). Capturing the variation in language

experience to understand language processing and learning. Language, Interaction and

Acquisition, 12(1), 82-109.

 18

Li, F., Hong, X., He, Z., Wu, S., & Zhang, C. (2021). Investigating Heritage Language

Processing: Meaning Composition in Chinese Classifier-Noun Phrasal Contexts.

Frontiers in psychology, 12.

McMurray, B., Apfelbaum, K. S., Colby, S., & Tomblin, J. B. (2022). Understanding language

processing in variable populations on their own terms: towards a functionalist

psycholinguistics of individual differences, development and disorders.

Navarro, E., DeLuca, V., & Rossi, E. (2022). It Takes a Village: Using Network Science to

Identify the Effect of Individual Differences in Bilingual Experience for Theory of Mind.

Brain Sciences, 12(4), 487.

Rothman, J., Bayram, F., DeLuca, V., Di Pisa, G., Dunabeitia, J. A., Gharibi, K., ... & Wulff, S.

(2022). Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of

“control”: Arguments and alternatives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1-14.

Salig, L. K., Valdés Kroff, J. R., Slevc, L. R., & Novick, J. M. (2021). Moving from bilingual

traits to states: Understanding cognition and language processing through moment-to-

moment variation. Neurobiology of Language, 2(4), 487-512.

Tiv, M., O’Regan, E., & Titone, D. (2021). In a bilingual state of mind: Investigating the

continuous relationship between bilingual language experience and mentalizing.

Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(5), 918-931.

Tosun, S., & Filipović, L. (2022). Lost in translation, apparently: Bilingual language processing

of evidentiality in a Turkish–English Translation and judgment task. Bilingualism:

Language and Cognition, 1-16.