Menu

Legal and Political Writings and [Audit, Documental,

Non-mythical Freemasonic, Removal of Cover, and
Declassification] Reports presented by the
respective author Shawn Dexter John, the sole
author of all presented publications on this
professional blog (website), now the joint Harvard
Law Review and Yale Law Journal [writing,
editorship, and executive management] competition
Winner
The following works were written, typed, published, and edited solely by Shawn Dexter John, also known by his operative
alias Khaled Hassan, the sole author of the published book sketch "The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an
Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality" (published with iUniverse); where not expressly stated as an excerpt or a
promotion, the presented [conventional] intellectual/intelligence Work Papers, political commentary Work Papers, and
related notes) are essentially completed [whole] drafts of related but independent material. All rights to the presented
material are held solely by Shawn Dexter John; the works are reserved for use by Shawn Dexter John solely. There is no
plagiarized content in The New Societies: Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of Commonality
and there is no plagiarized content in the following material; there is no lack of [necessary] citation; none of the works is of
a deceitful nature. The contents of the following material of presentation have not been and are not products of any non-
Agency assigned work from any university, employer, or any other entity, or any person; it should also be noted that The
New Societies was not the result of any such assignment(s) or task(s). No person or entity has directed or forced the
author into the presentation of the following material. Shawn Dexter John isn't contractually employed (and has never been
contractually employed) by any foreign government or system of related Caribbean governance. Also, he is not a licensed
attorney (yet), law professor (yet), instructor, college professor (yet), or a current law student. He is not and was never
compensated for the development of the following works. The author has taken and completed United States accredited
doctoral courses, which are inclusive of American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law courses. The level and the quality
of the following works are intended for a graduate-level (doctoral and post-doctoral) university audience and the related
professional community. The following are not meant to perpetuate any racial or ethnic agenda and are not of any
professional or other recruitment ideology; the following are primarily scholarly and Central Intelligence Agency related. The
primary law school of his legal education was St. Thomas University School of Law – Miami Gardens. The author is an
official, undisputed, and authentic citizen of the United States of America (USA). (Importantly, the author's partial education
at Southern University and A&M College, as a doctoral student in Public Policy [at the Nelson Mandela School of Public
Policy and Urban Affairs], served well in writing significant parts of the overall material. Both degrees awarded to the author
were received from Howard University, however.) (The author did complete a course-required research [unpaid] internship
with the Embassy of the Commonwealth of Dominica over a short period of time. The author's brief employment with USA
for UNHCR, as a paid fundraiser, never required or initiated the development of any presented material). The majority of the
following works have been written on personal computers (on private laptops of Shawn Dexter John by Shawn Dexter John
[solely] and, at times, on library desktops and/or on a personal and exclusionarily owned smartphone by Shawn Dexter
John [solely]). The author is sincere and honest in his postulation. *Shawn Dexter John isn't in representation of any other
individual as a cover – there is no other operative recognized as Khaled Hassan in the United States.*

Abortion Rights
—————

I will provide any update to the [edited and completed] manuscript, if any: [EDITED AND
COMPLETED] The New Societies – Concepts and Apperceptions of an Eastern Caribbean model of
Commonality.

The version published as a book was simply a sketch, published in that manner to provide a template
to government affiliates working across distance preceding its expected completion at a then later
date (corresponding with me editing work today) – quite a humble act. Tampering might have devalued
the book material but the model and intent were communicated well preceding the publication of the
[completed] edited version (here) – the completed version consists of slightly over 200 pages. (The
edited version is presented as a bonafide law article.)
—————

[Sole] Author: Shawn Dexter John

I am certain that the liberal understanding of the woman’s right to autonomy (civil, reproductive, and
anatomical) in the United States, that made accustomed prior to the reversal of Roe v. Wade, is the
correct formulation of related constitutional principles and humanism. I anticipate legislation in
Congress which would instate another effectual reversal, robustly, with time, for providing relief to
American women in the aftermath of torment endured (consequent to the Supreme Court’s 2022
decision). The mitigative formulation would resonate with the rest of the world, with the entire
Americas in mind.

I believe meticulously in the progressive rights once protected by the decision in Roe v. Wade. All
rights customarily attached to the landmark case. My recognition of more conservative principles of
relation in the Eastern Caribbean, my compromises in writing the original sketch of the Article, and
my expression of gradualistic methodologies for evolving those principles never renounced this
legal vocation of American law and culture or my un-coerced allegiance to it. A Union of the
Americas may not demand American imperialism but it will cater to American sensibilities
(concerning the continental incorporation of progressive laws).

Abortion privileges shouldn’t apply only succeeding rape, incestuous act(s), or an identified threat to
the pregnant woman’s health. All women should have the right to freely choose the lawful and vetted
procedure when medically safe, meaning without breaching ethics and humanist principles
(ensuring that well developed fetuses are not terminated), without supposing economic rights as
refuting universal facts addressing cruelty. (Note: Universal healthcare privileges should address all
fundamental and complimentary needs of clients.)

I am pro-Choice. Fact.

——————–

Email Contact: carindian1@gmail.com.

January 26, 2022  Edit  Leave a Reply

« Previous Next »