This document provides a rubric for assessing a case study assignment for a Bachelor of Business Administration program. The rubric outlines four categories (identification of main issues/problems, analysis and evaluation of main issues/problems, recommendation of effective solutions/strategies, and writing mechanics) and performance levels within each category (excellent, good, satisfactory, repeat). It also indicates the weightage and marking criteria for each category.
This document provides a rubric for assessing a case study assignment for a Bachelor of Business Administration program. The rubric outlines four categories (identification of main issues/problems, analysis and evaluation of main issues/problems, recommendation of effective solutions/strategies, and writing mechanics) and performance levels within each category (excellent, good, satisfactory, repeat). It also indicates the weightage and marking criteria for each category.
This document provides a rubric for assessing a case study assignment for a Bachelor of Business Administration program. The rubric outlines four categories (identification of main issues/problems, analysis and evaluation of main issues/problems, recommendation of effective solutions/strategies, and writing mechanics) and performance levels within each category (excellent, good, satisfactory, repeat). It also indicates the weightage and marking criteria for each category.
Subject Code 401 Session 2023-24 Semester IV Case Study No. 1 Case Study Title Due Date 9-Feb-2024 COs Measured CO1 CO2 CO3
RUBRICS FOR ASSESSMENT
Category Performance levels
Weightage Excellent Good Satisfactory Repeat 9 – 10 marks 7 – 8marks 5 – 6 marks (Less than 5 marks) Identification of 30% Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and Identifies and demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates a demonstrates a main sophisticated accomplished acceptable weak issues/problems understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of the main most some some issues/problems in issues/problems in issues/problems in issues/problems in the case study the case study the case study the case study Analysis and 30% Presents an Presents a thorough Presents a superficial Presents an insightful and analysis of most of analysis of some of incomplete analysis evaluation of thorough analysis the issues/problems the issues/problems of some of the main of identified identified identified issues/problems issues/problems issues/problems identified Recommendation 20% Supports diagnosis Supports diagnosis Little action No actions and opinion with and opinion but suggested and/or suggested and of effective strong arguments with limited solutions proposed inappropriate solution/strategie and well reasoning and to the issue in the solution proposed s documented evidence, presents case study not fully in the issue in the evidence, presents a somewhat a one- appropriate case study balanced and sided argument; critical review; demonstrates little interpretation is engagement with both reasonable and ideas presented objective Writing 20% Proper use of For most part Inconsistent use of Inconsistent use of grammar, proper use of grammar, grammar, Mechanics punctuations, grammar, punctuations, punctuations, spelling with punctuations, spelling, some spelling, many effective writing spelling with sentences with sentences with making logical reasonably ineffective writing ineffective writing sense. Writing is effective writing not making proper making no logical well organized and that generally logical sense. sense. Writing is logically coherent makes logical Writing is not well rambling and does sense. Writing is organized and not make any sense well organized and logically generally logically inconsistent at few consistent places