Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Laboratory Work 1

SCIENTIFIC METHODS

Group No. 4 Lastname1, Lastname2, Lastname(n)


Section: BEF1

Instruction. Applying your previous knowledge on social science statistics/research methods, explore related researches about the
psychological processes underlying behavior and use critical thinking to answer the following:

Group 1. The Little Albert Experiment, 1920


Group 2. Stanford Prison Experiment,1971
Group 3. The Asch Conformity Study,1951
Group 4. The Bobo Doll Experiment,1961,1963
Group 5. The Learned Helplessness Experiment,1965
Group 6. The Milgram Experiment,1963
Group 7. The Halo Effect Experiment,1977

15 Points- Answered Output


15 Points- Submitted Copy of the Experiment (pdf)
Or Reference URL Link (if no copy of full experiment to provide): _____________________

Title of the Experiment Method/s Hypothesis Independent Variable/s Dependent Variable/s


The Bobo Doll The Bobo Doll Children exposed to an There some Independent There some Dependent variables
Experiment Experiment, conducted adult’s aggressive variables that were that were measured during the
by psychologist Albert behavior would replicate measured during the Bobo Bobo Doll Experiment (1961,
Bandura in 1961, the said behavior when Doll Experiment (1961, 1963). Dependet variables such
investigated how presented with a similar 1963). Independent as:
children learn situation. The goal of the variables such as:
aggressive behavior experiment, which used a 1. Imitative aggression: Children
through observation. Bobo doll as the target, 1. Aggressive model is who observed the aggressive
It's considered a was to show that kids shown to 24 children model also respond with
landmark study in would act aggressively aggressive behaviour towards the
social learning theory. against a doll if they saw 2. Non-aggressive model doll compared to non-aggressive

Lab 1: Scientific Methods College of Humanities and Social Sciences| Caraga State University | © 2021
There are 72 an adult model acting that is shown to 24 children and control groups.
preschool-aged way. The concept was
children (36 boys and validated by empirical 3. No model is shown 2. Partial and Non-imitative
36 girls) from the results, which showed how (control group) - 24 aggression: There was a slight
Stanford University observational learning children aggression towards the doll, but it
Nursery School. The affects children’s was observed other aggression
children ranged in age development and display 4. Gender of the Model such as punching pillows and
between 3 and almost of aggressively behavior. throwing toys.
6 years. 5. The behavior of the
model 3. Verbal aggression: The
In this experiment, 24 aggressive model condition
children were divided 6. Age of the model showed that girls displayed more
into two groups: 24 physically aggressive responses
children were exposed when the model is male, while
to an adult modeling more verbally aggressive
aggressive behavior, responses were observed when
and 24 children were the model is female.
exposed to an adult
modeling non- 4. Boys engaged more physically
aggressive behavior. aggressive acts than girls. There
The remaining 24 kids were few differences in verbal
served as the control aggression between boys and
group, receiving no girls.
exposure to adult role
models.

The children's behavior


was noted by the
researchers both before
and after they were
shown the aggressive
adult model. Data,
including the number of
aggressive behaviors
and descriptions of the
specific hostile acts that
the children imitated,
were gathered using
both qualitative and
Lab 1: Scientific Methods College of Humanities and Social Sciences| Caraga State University | © 2021
quantitative methods.

Lab 1: Scientific Methods College of Humanities and Social Sciences| Caraga State University | © 2021

You might also like